Showing an $L^1$ function must be 0 by the boundedness of a potential type integral. Is there a cleaner way?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












Here's the problem:



Let $fin L^1$ satisfy
$$limsup_epsilon to 0 int_mathbbRint_mathbbR fracx-y dxdy < infty$$
Show that $f=0$ almost everywhere.



I've got what I think to be a solution to this problem, but I don't find it to be very elegant. Denote the integral by $I(epsilon)$. It involves restricting to a strip of width $h$ along the line $y=x$ and using Lebesgue Differentiation. I have to do a bunch of basic-type estimates on the integral, and what I finally get is that $I(epsilon) geq C frac1h int_K |f|^2$, where $K_n$ is a sequence of compact set which increase to $mathbbR$, minus perhaps a null set. Letting $h to 0$ shows that $int_K |f|^2 = 0$, so that $int_K |f| = 0$.



So I effectively hit the integral with a bunch of rather crude estimates. But this is a qual problem, whose solutions I'm used to being a little more clean. Is there any easier way? I can provide details to my solution, but if you have anything that looks better than what I've outlined above, I'd like to see it.



Thank you!







share|cite|improve this question
























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    Here's the problem:



    Let $fin L^1$ satisfy
    $$limsup_epsilon to 0 int_mathbbRint_mathbbR fracx-y dxdy < infty$$
    Show that $f=0$ almost everywhere.



    I've got what I think to be a solution to this problem, but I don't find it to be very elegant. Denote the integral by $I(epsilon)$. It involves restricting to a strip of width $h$ along the line $y=x$ and using Lebesgue Differentiation. I have to do a bunch of basic-type estimates on the integral, and what I finally get is that $I(epsilon) geq C frac1h int_K |f|^2$, where $K_n$ is a sequence of compact set which increase to $mathbbR$, minus perhaps a null set. Letting $h to 0$ shows that $int_K |f|^2 = 0$, so that $int_K |f| = 0$.



    So I effectively hit the integral with a bunch of rather crude estimates. But this is a qual problem, whose solutions I'm used to being a little more clean. Is there any easier way? I can provide details to my solution, but if you have anything that looks better than what I've outlined above, I'd like to see it.



    Thank you!







    share|cite|improve this question






















      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      Here's the problem:



      Let $fin L^1$ satisfy
      $$limsup_epsilon to 0 int_mathbbRint_mathbbR fracx-y dxdy < infty$$
      Show that $f=0$ almost everywhere.



      I've got what I think to be a solution to this problem, but I don't find it to be very elegant. Denote the integral by $I(epsilon)$. It involves restricting to a strip of width $h$ along the line $y=x$ and using Lebesgue Differentiation. I have to do a bunch of basic-type estimates on the integral, and what I finally get is that $I(epsilon) geq C frac1h int_K |f|^2$, where $K_n$ is a sequence of compact set which increase to $mathbbR$, minus perhaps a null set. Letting $h to 0$ shows that $int_K |f|^2 = 0$, so that $int_K |f| = 0$.



      So I effectively hit the integral with a bunch of rather crude estimates. But this is a qual problem, whose solutions I'm used to being a little more clean. Is there any easier way? I can provide details to my solution, but if you have anything that looks better than what I've outlined above, I'd like to see it.



      Thank you!







      share|cite|improve this question












      Here's the problem:



      Let $fin L^1$ satisfy
      $$limsup_epsilon to 0 int_mathbbRint_mathbbR fracx-y dxdy < infty$$
      Show that $f=0$ almost everywhere.



      I've got what I think to be a solution to this problem, but I don't find it to be very elegant. Denote the integral by $I(epsilon)$. It involves restricting to a strip of width $h$ along the line $y=x$ and using Lebesgue Differentiation. I have to do a bunch of basic-type estimates on the integral, and what I finally get is that $I(epsilon) geq C frac1h int_K |f|^2$, where $K_n$ is a sequence of compact set which increase to $mathbbR$, minus perhaps a null set. Letting $h to 0$ shows that $int_K |f|^2 = 0$, so that $int_K |f| = 0$.



      So I effectively hit the integral with a bunch of rather crude estimates. But this is a qual problem, whose solutions I'm used to being a little more clean. Is there any easier way? I can provide details to my solution, but if you have anything that looks better than what I've outlined above, I'd like to see it.



      Thank you!









      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Aug 19 at 2:16









      Van Latimer

      1298




      1298




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          Some ideas: 1. By the monotone convergence theorem, the $limsup$ equals



          $$int_mathbbRint_mathbbR frac^2 dxdy.$$



          1. Suppose $f= 0$ a.e. fails. Then there is a set $E$ of positive measure and a constant $c>0$ such that $|f|>c$ on $E.$


          2. A.e. point of $E$ is a point of density of $E.$ If $x$ is a point of density of $E$, then it seems probable to me that


          $$int_E frac1^2 dy =infty.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • Of course. Thank you so much.
            – Van Latimer
            Aug 19 at 18:22










          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2887289%2fshowing-an-l1-function-must-be-0-by-the-boundedness-of-a-potential-type-integ%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          1
          down vote













          Some ideas: 1. By the monotone convergence theorem, the $limsup$ equals



          $$int_mathbbRint_mathbbR frac^2 dxdy.$$



          1. Suppose $f= 0$ a.e. fails. Then there is a set $E$ of positive measure and a constant $c>0$ such that $|f|>c$ on $E.$


          2. A.e. point of $E$ is a point of density of $E.$ If $x$ is a point of density of $E$, then it seems probable to me that


          $$int_E frac1^2 dy =infty.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • Of course. Thank you so much.
            – Van Latimer
            Aug 19 at 18:22














          up vote
          1
          down vote













          Some ideas: 1. By the monotone convergence theorem, the $limsup$ equals



          $$int_mathbbRint_mathbbR frac^2 dxdy.$$



          1. Suppose $f= 0$ a.e. fails. Then there is a set $E$ of positive measure and a constant $c>0$ such that $|f|>c$ on $E.$


          2. A.e. point of $E$ is a point of density of $E.$ If $x$ is a point of density of $E$, then it seems probable to me that


          $$int_E frac1^2 dy =infty.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • Of course. Thank you so much.
            – Van Latimer
            Aug 19 at 18:22












          up vote
          1
          down vote










          up vote
          1
          down vote









          Some ideas: 1. By the monotone convergence theorem, the $limsup$ equals



          $$int_mathbbRint_mathbbR frac^2 dxdy.$$



          1. Suppose $f= 0$ a.e. fails. Then there is a set $E$ of positive measure and a constant $c>0$ such that $|f|>c$ on $E.$


          2. A.e. point of $E$ is a point of density of $E.$ If $x$ is a point of density of $E$, then it seems probable to me that


          $$int_E frac1^2 dy =infty.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer














          Some ideas: 1. By the monotone convergence theorem, the $limsup$ equals



          $$int_mathbbRint_mathbbR frac^2 dxdy.$$



          1. Suppose $f= 0$ a.e. fails. Then there is a set $E$ of positive measure and a constant $c>0$ such that $|f|>c$ on $E.$


          2. A.e. point of $E$ is a point of density of $E.$ If $x$ is a point of density of $E$, then it seems probable to me that


          $$int_E frac1^2 dy =infty.$$







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Aug 19 at 18:32

























          answered Aug 19 at 4:43









          zhw.

          66.8k42872




          66.8k42872











          • Of course. Thank you so much.
            – Van Latimer
            Aug 19 at 18:22
















          • Of course. Thank you so much.
            – Van Latimer
            Aug 19 at 18:22















          Of course. Thank you so much.
          – Van Latimer
          Aug 19 at 18:22




          Of course. Thank you so much.
          – Van Latimer
          Aug 19 at 18:22












           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2887289%2fshowing-an-l1-function-must-be-0-by-the-boundedness-of-a-potential-type-integ%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          tkz-euclide: tkzDrawCircle[R] not working

          How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

          1st Magritte Awards