Matrix geometric interpretation

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












What is the geometric interpretation of a matrix with only one element? If it means One dimension then how to identify the dimension viz X,YorZ?







share|cite|improve this question
























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    What is the geometric interpretation of a matrix with only one element? If it means One dimension then how to identify the dimension viz X,YorZ?







    share|cite|improve this question






















      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      What is the geometric interpretation of a matrix with only one element? If it means One dimension then how to identify the dimension viz X,YorZ?







      share|cite|improve this question












      What is the geometric interpretation of a matrix with only one element? If it means One dimension then how to identify the dimension viz X,YorZ?









      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Aug 19 at 6:11









      Mahesh

      11




      11




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          This is not an answer just a share of thought or discussion.



          In general,the concept of matrix is related to linear transformations from some dimensional space to some dimensional space and in case of a $1 times 1$ matrix, we must have a linear transformation from a One-dimensional space to one-dimensional space. The way you want the dimension i.e. X,Y or Z is not defined in 1-D space. It has only one dimension.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • Thanks for replying...My Query is if we can represent the 2*2 matrix using column vectors. How are we going to represent 1*1 matrix geometrically?
            – Mahesh
            Aug 19 at 7:02











          • did you mean this: Let, $A_1times 1=(a)_1times 1$ then $A_1times 1=abullet (1)_1times 1$, $a$ is a scalar quantity.
            – Sujit Bhattacharyya
            Aug 20 at 9:59











          • Actually I got to know that the numbers used in the matrix are actually the multiple of unit vectors that shows that a 1*1 matrix is a vector and not a scalar.
            – Mahesh
            Aug 21 at 11:08










          • check this out : quora.com/Is-a-1-x-1-matrix-a-scalar
            – Sujit Bhattacharyya
            Aug 22 at 3:58

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          A $1 times 1$ matrix is a number. To represent a number, all you need is a number line. If you prefer, you can think of this number line as an "$x$-axis".



          If you represent a $2 times 2$ matrix with $2$-dimensional "column vectors", then the analogous representation of a $1 times 1$ matrix would be an arrow on the number line, pointing from zero. That is, we can represent numbers as vectors on our $x$-axis.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • My answer here regarding $1 times 1$ matrices also comes to mind.
            – Omnomnomnom
            Aug 19 at 7:29










          • Thanks for replying...So the Vectors concerned are the Unit vectors .
            – Mahesh
            Aug 19 at 7:34










          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2887400%2fmatrix-geometric-interpretation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          0
          down vote













          This is not an answer just a share of thought or discussion.



          In general,the concept of matrix is related to linear transformations from some dimensional space to some dimensional space and in case of a $1 times 1$ matrix, we must have a linear transformation from a One-dimensional space to one-dimensional space. The way you want the dimension i.e. X,Y or Z is not defined in 1-D space. It has only one dimension.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • Thanks for replying...My Query is if we can represent the 2*2 matrix using column vectors. How are we going to represent 1*1 matrix geometrically?
            – Mahesh
            Aug 19 at 7:02











          • did you mean this: Let, $A_1times 1=(a)_1times 1$ then $A_1times 1=abullet (1)_1times 1$, $a$ is a scalar quantity.
            – Sujit Bhattacharyya
            Aug 20 at 9:59











          • Actually I got to know that the numbers used in the matrix are actually the multiple of unit vectors that shows that a 1*1 matrix is a vector and not a scalar.
            – Mahesh
            Aug 21 at 11:08










          • check this out : quora.com/Is-a-1-x-1-matrix-a-scalar
            – Sujit Bhattacharyya
            Aug 22 at 3:58














          up vote
          0
          down vote













          This is not an answer just a share of thought or discussion.



          In general,the concept of matrix is related to linear transformations from some dimensional space to some dimensional space and in case of a $1 times 1$ matrix, we must have a linear transformation from a One-dimensional space to one-dimensional space. The way you want the dimension i.e. X,Y or Z is not defined in 1-D space. It has only one dimension.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • Thanks for replying...My Query is if we can represent the 2*2 matrix using column vectors. How are we going to represent 1*1 matrix geometrically?
            – Mahesh
            Aug 19 at 7:02











          • did you mean this: Let, $A_1times 1=(a)_1times 1$ then $A_1times 1=abullet (1)_1times 1$, $a$ is a scalar quantity.
            – Sujit Bhattacharyya
            Aug 20 at 9:59











          • Actually I got to know that the numbers used in the matrix are actually the multiple of unit vectors that shows that a 1*1 matrix is a vector and not a scalar.
            – Mahesh
            Aug 21 at 11:08










          • check this out : quora.com/Is-a-1-x-1-matrix-a-scalar
            – Sujit Bhattacharyya
            Aug 22 at 3:58












          up vote
          0
          down vote










          up vote
          0
          down vote









          This is not an answer just a share of thought or discussion.



          In general,the concept of matrix is related to linear transformations from some dimensional space to some dimensional space and in case of a $1 times 1$ matrix, we must have a linear transformation from a One-dimensional space to one-dimensional space. The way you want the dimension i.e. X,Y or Z is not defined in 1-D space. It has only one dimension.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          This is not an answer just a share of thought or discussion.



          In general,the concept of matrix is related to linear transformations from some dimensional space to some dimensional space and in case of a $1 times 1$ matrix, we must have a linear transformation from a One-dimensional space to one-dimensional space. The way you want the dimension i.e. X,Y or Z is not defined in 1-D space. It has only one dimension.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Aug 19 at 6:24









          Sujit Bhattacharyya

          457116




          457116











          • Thanks for replying...My Query is if we can represent the 2*2 matrix using column vectors. How are we going to represent 1*1 matrix geometrically?
            – Mahesh
            Aug 19 at 7:02











          • did you mean this: Let, $A_1times 1=(a)_1times 1$ then $A_1times 1=abullet (1)_1times 1$, $a$ is a scalar quantity.
            – Sujit Bhattacharyya
            Aug 20 at 9:59











          • Actually I got to know that the numbers used in the matrix are actually the multiple of unit vectors that shows that a 1*1 matrix is a vector and not a scalar.
            – Mahesh
            Aug 21 at 11:08










          • check this out : quora.com/Is-a-1-x-1-matrix-a-scalar
            – Sujit Bhattacharyya
            Aug 22 at 3:58
















          • Thanks for replying...My Query is if we can represent the 2*2 matrix using column vectors. How are we going to represent 1*1 matrix geometrically?
            – Mahesh
            Aug 19 at 7:02











          • did you mean this: Let, $A_1times 1=(a)_1times 1$ then $A_1times 1=abullet (1)_1times 1$, $a$ is a scalar quantity.
            – Sujit Bhattacharyya
            Aug 20 at 9:59











          • Actually I got to know that the numbers used in the matrix are actually the multiple of unit vectors that shows that a 1*1 matrix is a vector and not a scalar.
            – Mahesh
            Aug 21 at 11:08










          • check this out : quora.com/Is-a-1-x-1-matrix-a-scalar
            – Sujit Bhattacharyya
            Aug 22 at 3:58















          Thanks for replying...My Query is if we can represent the 2*2 matrix using column vectors. How are we going to represent 1*1 matrix geometrically?
          – Mahesh
          Aug 19 at 7:02





          Thanks for replying...My Query is if we can represent the 2*2 matrix using column vectors. How are we going to represent 1*1 matrix geometrically?
          – Mahesh
          Aug 19 at 7:02













          did you mean this: Let, $A_1times 1=(a)_1times 1$ then $A_1times 1=abullet (1)_1times 1$, $a$ is a scalar quantity.
          – Sujit Bhattacharyya
          Aug 20 at 9:59





          did you mean this: Let, $A_1times 1=(a)_1times 1$ then $A_1times 1=abullet (1)_1times 1$, $a$ is a scalar quantity.
          – Sujit Bhattacharyya
          Aug 20 at 9:59













          Actually I got to know that the numbers used in the matrix are actually the multiple of unit vectors that shows that a 1*1 matrix is a vector and not a scalar.
          – Mahesh
          Aug 21 at 11:08




          Actually I got to know that the numbers used in the matrix are actually the multiple of unit vectors that shows that a 1*1 matrix is a vector and not a scalar.
          – Mahesh
          Aug 21 at 11:08












          check this out : quora.com/Is-a-1-x-1-matrix-a-scalar
          – Sujit Bhattacharyya
          Aug 22 at 3:58




          check this out : quora.com/Is-a-1-x-1-matrix-a-scalar
          – Sujit Bhattacharyya
          Aug 22 at 3:58










          up vote
          0
          down vote













          A $1 times 1$ matrix is a number. To represent a number, all you need is a number line. If you prefer, you can think of this number line as an "$x$-axis".



          If you represent a $2 times 2$ matrix with $2$-dimensional "column vectors", then the analogous representation of a $1 times 1$ matrix would be an arrow on the number line, pointing from zero. That is, we can represent numbers as vectors on our $x$-axis.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • My answer here regarding $1 times 1$ matrices also comes to mind.
            – Omnomnomnom
            Aug 19 at 7:29










          • Thanks for replying...So the Vectors concerned are the Unit vectors .
            – Mahesh
            Aug 19 at 7:34














          up vote
          0
          down vote













          A $1 times 1$ matrix is a number. To represent a number, all you need is a number line. If you prefer, you can think of this number line as an "$x$-axis".



          If you represent a $2 times 2$ matrix with $2$-dimensional "column vectors", then the analogous representation of a $1 times 1$ matrix would be an arrow on the number line, pointing from zero. That is, we can represent numbers as vectors on our $x$-axis.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • My answer here regarding $1 times 1$ matrices also comes to mind.
            – Omnomnomnom
            Aug 19 at 7:29










          • Thanks for replying...So the Vectors concerned are the Unit vectors .
            – Mahesh
            Aug 19 at 7:34












          up vote
          0
          down vote










          up vote
          0
          down vote









          A $1 times 1$ matrix is a number. To represent a number, all you need is a number line. If you prefer, you can think of this number line as an "$x$-axis".



          If you represent a $2 times 2$ matrix with $2$-dimensional "column vectors", then the analogous representation of a $1 times 1$ matrix would be an arrow on the number line, pointing from zero. That is, we can represent numbers as vectors on our $x$-axis.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          A $1 times 1$ matrix is a number. To represent a number, all you need is a number line. If you prefer, you can think of this number line as an "$x$-axis".



          If you represent a $2 times 2$ matrix with $2$-dimensional "column vectors", then the analogous representation of a $1 times 1$ matrix would be an arrow on the number line, pointing from zero. That is, we can represent numbers as vectors on our $x$-axis.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Aug 19 at 7:26









          Omnomnomnom

          122k784170




          122k784170











          • My answer here regarding $1 times 1$ matrices also comes to mind.
            – Omnomnomnom
            Aug 19 at 7:29










          • Thanks for replying...So the Vectors concerned are the Unit vectors .
            – Mahesh
            Aug 19 at 7:34
















          • My answer here regarding $1 times 1$ matrices also comes to mind.
            – Omnomnomnom
            Aug 19 at 7:29










          • Thanks for replying...So the Vectors concerned are the Unit vectors .
            – Mahesh
            Aug 19 at 7:34















          My answer here regarding $1 times 1$ matrices also comes to mind.
          – Omnomnomnom
          Aug 19 at 7:29




          My answer here regarding $1 times 1$ matrices also comes to mind.
          – Omnomnomnom
          Aug 19 at 7:29












          Thanks for replying...So the Vectors concerned are the Unit vectors .
          – Mahesh
          Aug 19 at 7:34




          Thanks for replying...So the Vectors concerned are the Unit vectors .
          – Mahesh
          Aug 19 at 7:34












           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2887400%2fmatrix-geometric-interpretation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

          Mutual Information Always Non-negative

          Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?