Why is homology functor additive?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
Let $mathcalA$ be an abelian category and $textCh_*(mathcalA)$ the category of chain complexes $A_bullet$ of objects in $mathcalA$. We let $$H_i(A_bullet):=textCoker(textim_d_i+1to textker(d_i)).$$
Why is the functor $H_i:textCh_*(mathcalA)tomathcalA$ an additive functor? Where additive means that $textHom(A_bullet,B_bullet)to textHom(H_i(A_bullet),H_i(B_bullet))$ is a group homomorphism.
I've drawn many diagrams, but can't get a hold of how to show this. I've seen that being left or right exact would imply this, but can't determine if either of those properties hold.
category-theory homology-cohomology homological-algebra
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
Let $mathcalA$ be an abelian category and $textCh_*(mathcalA)$ the category of chain complexes $A_bullet$ of objects in $mathcalA$. We let $$H_i(A_bullet):=textCoker(textim_d_i+1to textker(d_i)).$$
Why is the functor $H_i:textCh_*(mathcalA)tomathcalA$ an additive functor? Where additive means that $textHom(A_bullet,B_bullet)to textHom(H_i(A_bullet),H_i(B_bullet))$ is a group homomorphism.
I've drawn many diagrams, but can't get a hold of how to show this. I've seen that being left or right exact would imply this, but can't determine if either of those properties hold.
category-theory homology-cohomology homological-algebra
1
Do you know that for abelian categories, additive is equivalent to "preserves finite biproducts" ?
â Max
Aug 19 at 9:40
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
Let $mathcalA$ be an abelian category and $textCh_*(mathcalA)$ the category of chain complexes $A_bullet$ of objects in $mathcalA$. We let $$H_i(A_bullet):=textCoker(textim_d_i+1to textker(d_i)).$$
Why is the functor $H_i:textCh_*(mathcalA)tomathcalA$ an additive functor? Where additive means that $textHom(A_bullet,B_bullet)to textHom(H_i(A_bullet),H_i(B_bullet))$ is a group homomorphism.
I've drawn many diagrams, but can't get a hold of how to show this. I've seen that being left or right exact would imply this, but can't determine if either of those properties hold.
category-theory homology-cohomology homological-algebra
Let $mathcalA$ be an abelian category and $textCh_*(mathcalA)$ the category of chain complexes $A_bullet$ of objects in $mathcalA$. We let $$H_i(A_bullet):=textCoker(textim_d_i+1to textker(d_i)).$$
Why is the functor $H_i:textCh_*(mathcalA)tomathcalA$ an additive functor? Where additive means that $textHom(A_bullet,B_bullet)to textHom(H_i(A_bullet),H_i(B_bullet))$ is a group homomorphism.
I've drawn many diagrams, but can't get a hold of how to show this. I've seen that being left or right exact would imply this, but can't determine if either of those properties hold.
category-theory homology-cohomology homological-algebra
edited Aug 19 at 9:23
asked Aug 19 at 5:50
user585387
284
284
1
Do you know that for abelian categories, additive is equivalent to "preserves finite biproducts" ?
â Max
Aug 19 at 9:40
add a comment |Â
1
Do you know that for abelian categories, additive is equivalent to "preserves finite biproducts" ?
â Max
Aug 19 at 9:40
1
1
Do you know that for abelian categories, additive is equivalent to "preserves finite biproducts" ?
â Max
Aug 19 at 9:40
Do you know that for abelian categories, additive is equivalent to "preserves finite biproducts" ?
â Max
Aug 19 at 9:40
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
There are many way to prove this statements some more elegant than others but since you have tried to work out the proof by diagram chasing I assume you are looking for a solution by hand.
You have to prove that for every pair of morphisms
$$f,g in textCh_*(mathcal A)[A_bullet,B_bullet]$$
the following equality holds
$$H_i(f+g) = H_i(f)+H_i(g) .$$
By definition $H_i(f+g) colon H_i(A_bullet) to H_i(B_bullet)$ is the unique morphism that makes commute the following diagram:
$$requireAMScdbeginCD
operatornameimd_i+1^A @>>> ker d_i^A @>>> H_i(A) \
@Vf+gVV @VVf+gV @VVH_i(f+g)V \
operatornameimd_i+1^B @>>> ker d_i^B @>>> H_i(B)
endCD$$
where the vertical arrows are the obvious ones.
So to prove the above mentioned equality you just need to prove the commutativity of the square
$$beginCD
ker d_i^A @>pi_i^A>> H_i(A) \
@Vf+gVV @VVH_i(f)+H_i(g)V \
ker d_i^B @>>pi_i^B> H_i(B)
endCD$$
i.e. that the equality
$$pi_i^B circ (f+g) = (H_i(f)+H_i(g))circ pi_i^A$$
holds (where $pi_i^X colon ker d_i^X to H_i(X)$ is the cokernel of the inclusion $operatornameim d_i+1^X to ker d_i^X$).
The said equality follows from the fact that
$$pi_i^B circ f=H_i(f)circpi_i^A,$$
$$pi_i^B circ g=H_i(g)circpi_i^A,$$
and bilinearity of composition:
$$beginalign*
pi_i^B circ (f+g) &= (pi_i^B circ f)+(pi_i^B circ g) \
&= (H_i(f)circpi_i^A)+(H_i(g)circpi_i^A) \
&= (H_i(f)+H_i(g))circpi_i^A
endalign*$$
From this your claim follows.
Hope this helps.
+1, great proof !
â Max
Aug 19 at 22:00
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
There are many way to prove this statements some more elegant than others but since you have tried to work out the proof by diagram chasing I assume you are looking for a solution by hand.
You have to prove that for every pair of morphisms
$$f,g in textCh_*(mathcal A)[A_bullet,B_bullet]$$
the following equality holds
$$H_i(f+g) = H_i(f)+H_i(g) .$$
By definition $H_i(f+g) colon H_i(A_bullet) to H_i(B_bullet)$ is the unique morphism that makes commute the following diagram:
$$requireAMScdbeginCD
operatornameimd_i+1^A @>>> ker d_i^A @>>> H_i(A) \
@Vf+gVV @VVf+gV @VVH_i(f+g)V \
operatornameimd_i+1^B @>>> ker d_i^B @>>> H_i(B)
endCD$$
where the vertical arrows are the obvious ones.
So to prove the above mentioned equality you just need to prove the commutativity of the square
$$beginCD
ker d_i^A @>pi_i^A>> H_i(A) \
@Vf+gVV @VVH_i(f)+H_i(g)V \
ker d_i^B @>>pi_i^B> H_i(B)
endCD$$
i.e. that the equality
$$pi_i^B circ (f+g) = (H_i(f)+H_i(g))circ pi_i^A$$
holds (where $pi_i^X colon ker d_i^X to H_i(X)$ is the cokernel of the inclusion $operatornameim d_i+1^X to ker d_i^X$).
The said equality follows from the fact that
$$pi_i^B circ f=H_i(f)circpi_i^A,$$
$$pi_i^B circ g=H_i(g)circpi_i^A,$$
and bilinearity of composition:
$$beginalign*
pi_i^B circ (f+g) &= (pi_i^B circ f)+(pi_i^B circ g) \
&= (H_i(f)circpi_i^A)+(H_i(g)circpi_i^A) \
&= (H_i(f)+H_i(g))circpi_i^A
endalign*$$
From this your claim follows.
Hope this helps.
+1, great proof !
â Max
Aug 19 at 22:00
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
There are many way to prove this statements some more elegant than others but since you have tried to work out the proof by diagram chasing I assume you are looking for a solution by hand.
You have to prove that for every pair of morphisms
$$f,g in textCh_*(mathcal A)[A_bullet,B_bullet]$$
the following equality holds
$$H_i(f+g) = H_i(f)+H_i(g) .$$
By definition $H_i(f+g) colon H_i(A_bullet) to H_i(B_bullet)$ is the unique morphism that makes commute the following diagram:
$$requireAMScdbeginCD
operatornameimd_i+1^A @>>> ker d_i^A @>>> H_i(A) \
@Vf+gVV @VVf+gV @VVH_i(f+g)V \
operatornameimd_i+1^B @>>> ker d_i^B @>>> H_i(B)
endCD$$
where the vertical arrows are the obvious ones.
So to prove the above mentioned equality you just need to prove the commutativity of the square
$$beginCD
ker d_i^A @>pi_i^A>> H_i(A) \
@Vf+gVV @VVH_i(f)+H_i(g)V \
ker d_i^B @>>pi_i^B> H_i(B)
endCD$$
i.e. that the equality
$$pi_i^B circ (f+g) = (H_i(f)+H_i(g))circ pi_i^A$$
holds (where $pi_i^X colon ker d_i^X to H_i(X)$ is the cokernel of the inclusion $operatornameim d_i+1^X to ker d_i^X$).
The said equality follows from the fact that
$$pi_i^B circ f=H_i(f)circpi_i^A,$$
$$pi_i^B circ g=H_i(g)circpi_i^A,$$
and bilinearity of composition:
$$beginalign*
pi_i^B circ (f+g) &= (pi_i^B circ f)+(pi_i^B circ g) \
&= (H_i(f)circpi_i^A)+(H_i(g)circpi_i^A) \
&= (H_i(f)+H_i(g))circpi_i^A
endalign*$$
From this your claim follows.
Hope this helps.
+1, great proof !
â Max
Aug 19 at 22:00
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
There are many way to prove this statements some more elegant than others but since you have tried to work out the proof by diagram chasing I assume you are looking for a solution by hand.
You have to prove that for every pair of morphisms
$$f,g in textCh_*(mathcal A)[A_bullet,B_bullet]$$
the following equality holds
$$H_i(f+g) = H_i(f)+H_i(g) .$$
By definition $H_i(f+g) colon H_i(A_bullet) to H_i(B_bullet)$ is the unique morphism that makes commute the following diagram:
$$requireAMScdbeginCD
operatornameimd_i+1^A @>>> ker d_i^A @>>> H_i(A) \
@Vf+gVV @VVf+gV @VVH_i(f+g)V \
operatornameimd_i+1^B @>>> ker d_i^B @>>> H_i(B)
endCD$$
where the vertical arrows are the obvious ones.
So to prove the above mentioned equality you just need to prove the commutativity of the square
$$beginCD
ker d_i^A @>pi_i^A>> H_i(A) \
@Vf+gVV @VVH_i(f)+H_i(g)V \
ker d_i^B @>>pi_i^B> H_i(B)
endCD$$
i.e. that the equality
$$pi_i^B circ (f+g) = (H_i(f)+H_i(g))circ pi_i^A$$
holds (where $pi_i^X colon ker d_i^X to H_i(X)$ is the cokernel of the inclusion $operatornameim d_i+1^X to ker d_i^X$).
The said equality follows from the fact that
$$pi_i^B circ f=H_i(f)circpi_i^A,$$
$$pi_i^B circ g=H_i(g)circpi_i^A,$$
and bilinearity of composition:
$$beginalign*
pi_i^B circ (f+g) &= (pi_i^B circ f)+(pi_i^B circ g) \
&= (H_i(f)circpi_i^A)+(H_i(g)circpi_i^A) \
&= (H_i(f)+H_i(g))circpi_i^A
endalign*$$
From this your claim follows.
Hope this helps.
There are many way to prove this statements some more elegant than others but since you have tried to work out the proof by diagram chasing I assume you are looking for a solution by hand.
You have to prove that for every pair of morphisms
$$f,g in textCh_*(mathcal A)[A_bullet,B_bullet]$$
the following equality holds
$$H_i(f+g) = H_i(f)+H_i(g) .$$
By definition $H_i(f+g) colon H_i(A_bullet) to H_i(B_bullet)$ is the unique morphism that makes commute the following diagram:
$$requireAMScdbeginCD
operatornameimd_i+1^A @>>> ker d_i^A @>>> H_i(A) \
@Vf+gVV @VVf+gV @VVH_i(f+g)V \
operatornameimd_i+1^B @>>> ker d_i^B @>>> H_i(B)
endCD$$
where the vertical arrows are the obvious ones.
So to prove the above mentioned equality you just need to prove the commutativity of the square
$$beginCD
ker d_i^A @>pi_i^A>> H_i(A) \
@Vf+gVV @VVH_i(f)+H_i(g)V \
ker d_i^B @>>pi_i^B> H_i(B)
endCD$$
i.e. that the equality
$$pi_i^B circ (f+g) = (H_i(f)+H_i(g))circ pi_i^A$$
holds (where $pi_i^X colon ker d_i^X to H_i(X)$ is the cokernel of the inclusion $operatornameim d_i+1^X to ker d_i^X$).
The said equality follows from the fact that
$$pi_i^B circ f=H_i(f)circpi_i^A,$$
$$pi_i^B circ g=H_i(g)circpi_i^A,$$
and bilinearity of composition:
$$beginalign*
pi_i^B circ (f+g) &= (pi_i^B circ f)+(pi_i^B circ g) \
&= (H_i(f)circpi_i^A)+(H_i(g)circpi_i^A) \
&= (H_i(f)+H_i(g))circpi_i^A
endalign*$$
From this your claim follows.
Hope this helps.
edited 12 hours ago
Jendrik Stelzner
7,57221037
7,57221037
answered Aug 19 at 14:44
Giorgio Mossa
13.4k11748
13.4k11748
+1, great proof !
â Max
Aug 19 at 22:00
add a comment |Â
+1, great proof !
â Max
Aug 19 at 22:00
+1, great proof !
â Max
Aug 19 at 22:00
+1, great proof !
â Max
Aug 19 at 22:00
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2887387%2fwhy-is-homology-functor-additive%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
1
Do you know that for abelian categories, additive is equivalent to "preserves finite biproducts" ?
â Max
Aug 19 at 9:40