Why is homology functor additive?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1












Let $mathcalA$ be an abelian category and $textCh_*(mathcalA)$ the category of chain complexes $A_bullet$ of objects in $mathcalA$. We let $$H_i(A_bullet):=textCoker(textim_d_i+1to textker(d_i)).$$
Why is the functor $H_i:textCh_*(mathcalA)tomathcalA$ an additive functor? Where additive means that $textHom(A_bullet,B_bullet)to textHom(H_i(A_bullet),H_i(B_bullet))$ is a group homomorphism.



I've drawn many diagrams, but can't get a hold of how to show this. I've seen that being left or right exact would imply this, but can't determine if either of those properties hold.







share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    Do you know that for abelian categories, additive is equivalent to "preserves finite biproducts" ?
    – Max
    Aug 19 at 9:40














up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1












Let $mathcalA$ be an abelian category and $textCh_*(mathcalA)$ the category of chain complexes $A_bullet$ of objects in $mathcalA$. We let $$H_i(A_bullet):=textCoker(textim_d_i+1to textker(d_i)).$$
Why is the functor $H_i:textCh_*(mathcalA)tomathcalA$ an additive functor? Where additive means that $textHom(A_bullet,B_bullet)to textHom(H_i(A_bullet),H_i(B_bullet))$ is a group homomorphism.



I've drawn many diagrams, but can't get a hold of how to show this. I've seen that being left or right exact would imply this, but can't determine if either of those properties hold.







share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    Do you know that for abelian categories, additive is equivalent to "preserves finite biproducts" ?
    – Max
    Aug 19 at 9:40












up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1






1





Let $mathcalA$ be an abelian category and $textCh_*(mathcalA)$ the category of chain complexes $A_bullet$ of objects in $mathcalA$. We let $$H_i(A_bullet):=textCoker(textim_d_i+1to textker(d_i)).$$
Why is the functor $H_i:textCh_*(mathcalA)tomathcalA$ an additive functor? Where additive means that $textHom(A_bullet,B_bullet)to textHom(H_i(A_bullet),H_i(B_bullet))$ is a group homomorphism.



I've drawn many diagrams, but can't get a hold of how to show this. I've seen that being left or right exact would imply this, but can't determine if either of those properties hold.







share|cite|improve this question














Let $mathcalA$ be an abelian category and $textCh_*(mathcalA)$ the category of chain complexes $A_bullet$ of objects in $mathcalA$. We let $$H_i(A_bullet):=textCoker(textim_d_i+1to textker(d_i)).$$
Why is the functor $H_i:textCh_*(mathcalA)tomathcalA$ an additive functor? Where additive means that $textHom(A_bullet,B_bullet)to textHom(H_i(A_bullet),H_i(B_bullet))$ is a group homomorphism.



I've drawn many diagrams, but can't get a hold of how to show this. I've seen that being left or right exact would imply this, but can't determine if either of those properties hold.









share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 19 at 9:23

























asked Aug 19 at 5:50









user585387

284




284







  • 1




    Do you know that for abelian categories, additive is equivalent to "preserves finite biproducts" ?
    – Max
    Aug 19 at 9:40












  • 1




    Do you know that for abelian categories, additive is equivalent to "preserves finite biproducts" ?
    – Max
    Aug 19 at 9:40







1




1




Do you know that for abelian categories, additive is equivalent to "preserves finite biproducts" ?
– Max
Aug 19 at 9:40




Do you know that for abelian categories, additive is equivalent to "preserves finite biproducts" ?
– Max
Aug 19 at 9:40










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote



accepted










There are many way to prove this statements some more elegant than others but since you have tried to work out the proof by diagram chasing I assume you are looking for a solution by hand.



You have to prove that for every pair of morphisms
$$f,g in textCh_*(mathcal A)[A_bullet,B_bullet]$$
the following equality holds
$$H_i(f+g) = H_i(f)+H_i(g) .$$



By definition $H_i(f+g) colon H_i(A_bullet) to H_i(B_bullet)$ is the unique morphism that makes commute the following diagram:
$$requireAMScdbeginCD
operatornameimd_i+1^A @>>> ker d_i^A @>>> H_i(A) \
@Vf+gVV @VVf+gV @VVH_i(f+g)V \
operatornameimd_i+1^B @>>> ker d_i^B @>>> H_i(B)
endCD$$
where the vertical arrows are the obvious ones.



So to prove the above mentioned equality you just need to prove the commutativity of the square
$$beginCD
ker d_i^A @>pi_i^A>> H_i(A) \
@Vf+gVV @VVH_i(f)+H_i(g)V \
ker d_i^B @>>pi_i^B> H_i(B)
endCD$$
i.e. that the equality
$$pi_i^B circ (f+g) = (H_i(f)+H_i(g))circ pi_i^A$$
holds (where $pi_i^X colon ker d_i^X to H_i(X)$ is the cokernel of the inclusion $operatornameim d_i+1^X to ker d_i^X$).



The said equality follows from the fact that
$$pi_i^B circ f=H_i(f)circpi_i^A,$$
$$pi_i^B circ g=H_i(g)circpi_i^A,$$
and bilinearity of composition:
$$beginalign*
pi_i^B circ (f+g) &= (pi_i^B circ f)+(pi_i^B circ g) \
&= (H_i(f)circpi_i^A)+(H_i(g)circpi_i^A) \
&= (H_i(f)+H_i(g))circpi_i^A
endalign*$$



From this your claim follows.



Hope this helps.






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • +1, great proof !
    – Max
    Aug 19 at 22:00










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2887387%2fwhy-is-homology-functor-additive%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
4
down vote



accepted










There are many way to prove this statements some more elegant than others but since you have tried to work out the proof by diagram chasing I assume you are looking for a solution by hand.



You have to prove that for every pair of morphisms
$$f,g in textCh_*(mathcal A)[A_bullet,B_bullet]$$
the following equality holds
$$H_i(f+g) = H_i(f)+H_i(g) .$$



By definition $H_i(f+g) colon H_i(A_bullet) to H_i(B_bullet)$ is the unique morphism that makes commute the following diagram:
$$requireAMScdbeginCD
operatornameimd_i+1^A @>>> ker d_i^A @>>> H_i(A) \
@Vf+gVV @VVf+gV @VVH_i(f+g)V \
operatornameimd_i+1^B @>>> ker d_i^B @>>> H_i(B)
endCD$$
where the vertical arrows are the obvious ones.



So to prove the above mentioned equality you just need to prove the commutativity of the square
$$beginCD
ker d_i^A @>pi_i^A>> H_i(A) \
@Vf+gVV @VVH_i(f)+H_i(g)V \
ker d_i^B @>>pi_i^B> H_i(B)
endCD$$
i.e. that the equality
$$pi_i^B circ (f+g) = (H_i(f)+H_i(g))circ pi_i^A$$
holds (where $pi_i^X colon ker d_i^X to H_i(X)$ is the cokernel of the inclusion $operatornameim d_i+1^X to ker d_i^X$).



The said equality follows from the fact that
$$pi_i^B circ f=H_i(f)circpi_i^A,$$
$$pi_i^B circ g=H_i(g)circpi_i^A,$$
and bilinearity of composition:
$$beginalign*
pi_i^B circ (f+g) &= (pi_i^B circ f)+(pi_i^B circ g) \
&= (H_i(f)circpi_i^A)+(H_i(g)circpi_i^A) \
&= (H_i(f)+H_i(g))circpi_i^A
endalign*$$



From this your claim follows.



Hope this helps.






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • +1, great proof !
    – Max
    Aug 19 at 22:00














up vote
4
down vote



accepted










There are many way to prove this statements some more elegant than others but since you have tried to work out the proof by diagram chasing I assume you are looking for a solution by hand.



You have to prove that for every pair of morphisms
$$f,g in textCh_*(mathcal A)[A_bullet,B_bullet]$$
the following equality holds
$$H_i(f+g) = H_i(f)+H_i(g) .$$



By definition $H_i(f+g) colon H_i(A_bullet) to H_i(B_bullet)$ is the unique morphism that makes commute the following diagram:
$$requireAMScdbeginCD
operatornameimd_i+1^A @>>> ker d_i^A @>>> H_i(A) \
@Vf+gVV @VVf+gV @VVH_i(f+g)V \
operatornameimd_i+1^B @>>> ker d_i^B @>>> H_i(B)
endCD$$
where the vertical arrows are the obvious ones.



So to prove the above mentioned equality you just need to prove the commutativity of the square
$$beginCD
ker d_i^A @>pi_i^A>> H_i(A) \
@Vf+gVV @VVH_i(f)+H_i(g)V \
ker d_i^B @>>pi_i^B> H_i(B)
endCD$$
i.e. that the equality
$$pi_i^B circ (f+g) = (H_i(f)+H_i(g))circ pi_i^A$$
holds (where $pi_i^X colon ker d_i^X to H_i(X)$ is the cokernel of the inclusion $operatornameim d_i+1^X to ker d_i^X$).



The said equality follows from the fact that
$$pi_i^B circ f=H_i(f)circpi_i^A,$$
$$pi_i^B circ g=H_i(g)circpi_i^A,$$
and bilinearity of composition:
$$beginalign*
pi_i^B circ (f+g) &= (pi_i^B circ f)+(pi_i^B circ g) \
&= (H_i(f)circpi_i^A)+(H_i(g)circpi_i^A) \
&= (H_i(f)+H_i(g))circpi_i^A
endalign*$$



From this your claim follows.



Hope this helps.






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • +1, great proof !
    – Max
    Aug 19 at 22:00












up vote
4
down vote



accepted







up vote
4
down vote



accepted






There are many way to prove this statements some more elegant than others but since you have tried to work out the proof by diagram chasing I assume you are looking for a solution by hand.



You have to prove that for every pair of morphisms
$$f,g in textCh_*(mathcal A)[A_bullet,B_bullet]$$
the following equality holds
$$H_i(f+g) = H_i(f)+H_i(g) .$$



By definition $H_i(f+g) colon H_i(A_bullet) to H_i(B_bullet)$ is the unique morphism that makes commute the following diagram:
$$requireAMScdbeginCD
operatornameimd_i+1^A @>>> ker d_i^A @>>> H_i(A) \
@Vf+gVV @VVf+gV @VVH_i(f+g)V \
operatornameimd_i+1^B @>>> ker d_i^B @>>> H_i(B)
endCD$$
where the vertical arrows are the obvious ones.



So to prove the above mentioned equality you just need to prove the commutativity of the square
$$beginCD
ker d_i^A @>pi_i^A>> H_i(A) \
@Vf+gVV @VVH_i(f)+H_i(g)V \
ker d_i^B @>>pi_i^B> H_i(B)
endCD$$
i.e. that the equality
$$pi_i^B circ (f+g) = (H_i(f)+H_i(g))circ pi_i^A$$
holds (where $pi_i^X colon ker d_i^X to H_i(X)$ is the cokernel of the inclusion $operatornameim d_i+1^X to ker d_i^X$).



The said equality follows from the fact that
$$pi_i^B circ f=H_i(f)circpi_i^A,$$
$$pi_i^B circ g=H_i(g)circpi_i^A,$$
and bilinearity of composition:
$$beginalign*
pi_i^B circ (f+g) &= (pi_i^B circ f)+(pi_i^B circ g) \
&= (H_i(f)circpi_i^A)+(H_i(g)circpi_i^A) \
&= (H_i(f)+H_i(g))circpi_i^A
endalign*$$



From this your claim follows.



Hope this helps.






share|cite|improve this answer














There are many way to prove this statements some more elegant than others but since you have tried to work out the proof by diagram chasing I assume you are looking for a solution by hand.



You have to prove that for every pair of morphisms
$$f,g in textCh_*(mathcal A)[A_bullet,B_bullet]$$
the following equality holds
$$H_i(f+g) = H_i(f)+H_i(g) .$$



By definition $H_i(f+g) colon H_i(A_bullet) to H_i(B_bullet)$ is the unique morphism that makes commute the following diagram:
$$requireAMScdbeginCD
operatornameimd_i+1^A @>>> ker d_i^A @>>> H_i(A) \
@Vf+gVV @VVf+gV @VVH_i(f+g)V \
operatornameimd_i+1^B @>>> ker d_i^B @>>> H_i(B)
endCD$$
where the vertical arrows are the obvious ones.



So to prove the above mentioned equality you just need to prove the commutativity of the square
$$beginCD
ker d_i^A @>pi_i^A>> H_i(A) \
@Vf+gVV @VVH_i(f)+H_i(g)V \
ker d_i^B @>>pi_i^B> H_i(B)
endCD$$
i.e. that the equality
$$pi_i^B circ (f+g) = (H_i(f)+H_i(g))circ pi_i^A$$
holds (where $pi_i^X colon ker d_i^X to H_i(X)$ is the cokernel of the inclusion $operatornameim d_i+1^X to ker d_i^X$).



The said equality follows from the fact that
$$pi_i^B circ f=H_i(f)circpi_i^A,$$
$$pi_i^B circ g=H_i(g)circpi_i^A,$$
and bilinearity of composition:
$$beginalign*
pi_i^B circ (f+g) &= (pi_i^B circ f)+(pi_i^B circ g) \
&= (H_i(f)circpi_i^A)+(H_i(g)circpi_i^A) \
&= (H_i(f)+H_i(g))circpi_i^A
endalign*$$



From this your claim follows.



Hope this helps.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited 12 hours ago









Jendrik Stelzner

7,57221037




7,57221037










answered Aug 19 at 14:44









Giorgio Mossa

13.4k11748




13.4k11748











  • +1, great proof !
    – Max
    Aug 19 at 22:00
















  • +1, great proof !
    – Max
    Aug 19 at 22:00















+1, great proof !
– Max
Aug 19 at 22:00




+1, great proof !
– Max
Aug 19 at 22:00












 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2887387%2fwhy-is-homology-functor-additive%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

Mutual Information Always Non-negative

Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?