Atiyah's K Theory, pg 4

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
4
down vote

favorite












On page 4, of Atiyah's $K$ theroy
he stated




Suppose $V,W$ are real f.d. v.s, $E = X times V$ and $F= X times W$ are corresponding vector bundles. Then any homomoprhism $varphi:E rightarrow F$ determines a map
$$ Phi: X rightarrow Hom(V,W), text satisfying varphi(x,v) = (x, Phi(x)v). $$
where $Phi$ is continuous when $Hom(V,W)$ is considered the usual topology. Conversely, any such continuous map $Phi:X rightarrow Hom(V,W)$ determines a homomorphism $varphi:E rightarrow F$.




I would appreciate if someone can give a detailed explanation.




EDIT: Here is my attempt to spell out 3. of Bananeen's explanation.




$(Leftarrow)$ An open set in $Hom(V,W)$, containing $Phi(x)=(a_i,j(x))$, is set of matrices $A$, $|A-a_i,j(x)|<varepsilon$. Continuity at each $e_j$, shows exists open sets $U_1, ldots, U_n$ containing $x$ and that $$|(a_i,j(x))_i=1^n - (a_i,j(y))^i=1_n| < varepsilon/2n text for y in U_j.$$



Thus, taking $bigcap U_i=U$, we have found an nhood of $x$, such that for all $y in U$, $|Phi(y)-Phi(x)|<varepsilon$.



$(Rightarrow)$ The converse follows since on the basis $e_j$ vectors, $|Phi(x)e_j - Phi(y)e_j| le |Phi(x)-Phi(y)|$. For any arbitrary vector $v$, by triangle inequality, result follows.








share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    Are they real or complex vector spaces? No matter, $textHom(V,W)$ will be a finite dimensional real vector space, and there is only one Hausdorff topological vector space on a f.d.r.v.s., the "usual one".
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Aug 19 at 10:08














up vote
4
down vote

favorite












On page 4, of Atiyah's $K$ theroy
he stated




Suppose $V,W$ are real f.d. v.s, $E = X times V$ and $F= X times W$ are corresponding vector bundles. Then any homomoprhism $varphi:E rightarrow F$ determines a map
$$ Phi: X rightarrow Hom(V,W), text satisfying varphi(x,v) = (x, Phi(x)v). $$
where $Phi$ is continuous when $Hom(V,W)$ is considered the usual topology. Conversely, any such continuous map $Phi:X rightarrow Hom(V,W)$ determines a homomorphism $varphi:E rightarrow F$.




I would appreciate if someone can give a detailed explanation.




EDIT: Here is my attempt to spell out 3. of Bananeen's explanation.




$(Leftarrow)$ An open set in $Hom(V,W)$, containing $Phi(x)=(a_i,j(x))$, is set of matrices $A$, $|A-a_i,j(x)|<varepsilon$. Continuity at each $e_j$, shows exists open sets $U_1, ldots, U_n$ containing $x$ and that $$|(a_i,j(x))_i=1^n - (a_i,j(y))^i=1_n| < varepsilon/2n text for y in U_j.$$



Thus, taking $bigcap U_i=U$, we have found an nhood of $x$, such that for all $y in U$, $|Phi(y)-Phi(x)|<varepsilon$.



$(Rightarrow)$ The converse follows since on the basis $e_j$ vectors, $|Phi(x)e_j - Phi(y)e_j| le |Phi(x)-Phi(y)|$. For any arbitrary vector $v$, by triangle inequality, result follows.








share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    Are they real or complex vector spaces? No matter, $textHom(V,W)$ will be a finite dimensional real vector space, and there is only one Hausdorff topological vector space on a f.d.r.v.s., the "usual one".
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Aug 19 at 10:08












up vote
4
down vote

favorite









up vote
4
down vote

favorite











On page 4, of Atiyah's $K$ theroy
he stated




Suppose $V,W$ are real f.d. v.s, $E = X times V$ and $F= X times W$ are corresponding vector bundles. Then any homomoprhism $varphi:E rightarrow F$ determines a map
$$ Phi: X rightarrow Hom(V,W), text satisfying varphi(x,v) = (x, Phi(x)v). $$
where $Phi$ is continuous when $Hom(V,W)$ is considered the usual topology. Conversely, any such continuous map $Phi:X rightarrow Hom(V,W)$ determines a homomorphism $varphi:E rightarrow F$.




I would appreciate if someone can give a detailed explanation.




EDIT: Here is my attempt to spell out 3. of Bananeen's explanation.




$(Leftarrow)$ An open set in $Hom(V,W)$, containing $Phi(x)=(a_i,j(x))$, is set of matrices $A$, $|A-a_i,j(x)|<varepsilon$. Continuity at each $e_j$, shows exists open sets $U_1, ldots, U_n$ containing $x$ and that $$|(a_i,j(x))_i=1^n - (a_i,j(y))^i=1_n| < varepsilon/2n text for y in U_j.$$



Thus, taking $bigcap U_i=U$, we have found an nhood of $x$, such that for all $y in U$, $|Phi(y)-Phi(x)|<varepsilon$.



$(Rightarrow)$ The converse follows since on the basis $e_j$ vectors, $|Phi(x)e_j - Phi(y)e_j| le |Phi(x)-Phi(y)|$. For any arbitrary vector $v$, by triangle inequality, result follows.








share|cite|improve this question














On page 4, of Atiyah's $K$ theroy
he stated




Suppose $V,W$ are real f.d. v.s, $E = X times V$ and $F= X times W$ are corresponding vector bundles. Then any homomoprhism $varphi:E rightarrow F$ determines a map
$$ Phi: X rightarrow Hom(V,W), text satisfying varphi(x,v) = (x, Phi(x)v). $$
where $Phi$ is continuous when $Hom(V,W)$ is considered the usual topology. Conversely, any such continuous map $Phi:X rightarrow Hom(V,W)$ determines a homomorphism $varphi:E rightarrow F$.




I would appreciate if someone can give a detailed explanation.




EDIT: Here is my attempt to spell out 3. of Bananeen's explanation.




$(Leftarrow)$ An open set in $Hom(V,W)$, containing $Phi(x)=(a_i,j(x))$, is set of matrices $A$, $|A-a_i,j(x)|<varepsilon$. Continuity at each $e_j$, shows exists open sets $U_1, ldots, U_n$ containing $x$ and that $$|(a_i,j(x))_i=1^n - (a_i,j(y))^i=1_n| < varepsilon/2n text for y in U_j.$$



Thus, taking $bigcap U_i=U$, we have found an nhood of $x$, such that for all $y in U$, $|Phi(y)-Phi(x)|<varepsilon$.



$(Rightarrow)$ The converse follows since on the basis $e_j$ vectors, $|Phi(x)e_j - Phi(y)e_j| le |Phi(x)-Phi(y)|$. For any arbitrary vector $v$, by triangle inequality, result follows.










share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 20 at 0:29

























asked Aug 19 at 10:02









Cyryl L.

1,7132821




1,7132821







  • 1




    Are they real or complex vector spaces? No matter, $textHom(V,W)$ will be a finite dimensional real vector space, and there is only one Hausdorff topological vector space on a f.d.r.v.s., the "usual one".
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Aug 19 at 10:08












  • 1




    Are they real or complex vector spaces? No matter, $textHom(V,W)$ will be a finite dimensional real vector space, and there is only one Hausdorff topological vector space on a f.d.r.v.s., the "usual one".
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Aug 19 at 10:08







1




1




Are they real or complex vector spaces? No matter, $textHom(V,W)$ will be a finite dimensional real vector space, and there is only one Hausdorff topological vector space on a f.d.r.v.s., the "usual one".
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Aug 19 at 10:08




Are they real or complex vector spaces? No matter, $textHom(V,W)$ will be a finite dimensional real vector space, and there is only one Hausdorff topological vector space on a f.d.r.v.s., the "usual one".
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Aug 19 at 10:08










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










  1. Since $V,W$ are finite dimensional vector spaces, $Hom(V,W)$ is itself a finite dimensional vector space. Thus after choice of any bases for $V$ and $W$, $Hom(V,W)$ is identified with $mathbbR^nm$, and the standard Euclidean metric defines the "usual topology" (two matrices are "close" to each other, if their components are "close") . Then it is a standard exercise to show that topologies arising from norms on finite dimensional vector spaces are all equivalent.

  2. $Phi(x)$ is defined as follows: vector $v in V$ is mapped to $W$ via the following composition: $$V to X times V xrightarrowphi X times W xrightarrowpr_2 W$$
    $$v mapsto (x,v) mapsto phi(x,v)=(x, Phi(x)v) mapsto Phi(x)v$$which is linear because of fiberwise linearity of $phi$.

  3. To show that $Phi(x)$ is continuous, use the fact that map $Phi: X to Hom(V,W)$ is continuous iff $ev_v: X to W$ defined by $x mapsto Phi(x) v$ is continuous for any $vin V$. To see this, again choose bases for $V=span(e_1,...,e_n)$, $W=span(u_1,...,u_m)$, then $Phi(x)$ is a matrix valued function $x mapsto A(x)=( a_i,j(x) )$, and $x mapsto A(x)e_i$ just selects the $i$-th column of this matrix.

So to show continuity of $Phi(x)$ from 2 we just observe that $$x mapsto phi(x,v) mapsto pr_2 (phi(x,v) ) = Phi(x)v$$ is continuous for any $v in V$.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • may you elaborate on 3? I don't see how your point explains the equivalence.
    – Cyryl L.
    Aug 20 at 0:18










  • Also, if we were using 2 for $Phi(x)$, should not the first map be $$X rightarrow X times V$$ given by $x mapsto (x,v)$?
    – Cyryl L.
    Aug 20 at 1:42










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2887553%2fatiyahs-k-theory-pg-4%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote



accepted










  1. Since $V,W$ are finite dimensional vector spaces, $Hom(V,W)$ is itself a finite dimensional vector space. Thus after choice of any bases for $V$ and $W$, $Hom(V,W)$ is identified with $mathbbR^nm$, and the standard Euclidean metric defines the "usual topology" (two matrices are "close" to each other, if their components are "close") . Then it is a standard exercise to show that topologies arising from norms on finite dimensional vector spaces are all equivalent.

  2. $Phi(x)$ is defined as follows: vector $v in V$ is mapped to $W$ via the following composition: $$V to X times V xrightarrowphi X times W xrightarrowpr_2 W$$
    $$v mapsto (x,v) mapsto phi(x,v)=(x, Phi(x)v) mapsto Phi(x)v$$which is linear because of fiberwise linearity of $phi$.

  3. To show that $Phi(x)$ is continuous, use the fact that map $Phi: X to Hom(V,W)$ is continuous iff $ev_v: X to W$ defined by $x mapsto Phi(x) v$ is continuous for any $vin V$. To see this, again choose bases for $V=span(e_1,...,e_n)$, $W=span(u_1,...,u_m)$, then $Phi(x)$ is a matrix valued function $x mapsto A(x)=( a_i,j(x) )$, and $x mapsto A(x)e_i$ just selects the $i$-th column of this matrix.

So to show continuity of $Phi(x)$ from 2 we just observe that $$x mapsto phi(x,v) mapsto pr_2 (phi(x,v) ) = Phi(x)v$$ is continuous for any $v in V$.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • may you elaborate on 3? I don't see how your point explains the equivalence.
    – Cyryl L.
    Aug 20 at 0:18










  • Also, if we were using 2 for $Phi(x)$, should not the first map be $$X rightarrow X times V$$ given by $x mapsto (x,v)$?
    – Cyryl L.
    Aug 20 at 1:42














up vote
1
down vote



accepted










  1. Since $V,W$ are finite dimensional vector spaces, $Hom(V,W)$ is itself a finite dimensional vector space. Thus after choice of any bases for $V$ and $W$, $Hom(V,W)$ is identified with $mathbbR^nm$, and the standard Euclidean metric defines the "usual topology" (two matrices are "close" to each other, if their components are "close") . Then it is a standard exercise to show that topologies arising from norms on finite dimensional vector spaces are all equivalent.

  2. $Phi(x)$ is defined as follows: vector $v in V$ is mapped to $W$ via the following composition: $$V to X times V xrightarrowphi X times W xrightarrowpr_2 W$$
    $$v mapsto (x,v) mapsto phi(x,v)=(x, Phi(x)v) mapsto Phi(x)v$$which is linear because of fiberwise linearity of $phi$.

  3. To show that $Phi(x)$ is continuous, use the fact that map $Phi: X to Hom(V,W)$ is continuous iff $ev_v: X to W$ defined by $x mapsto Phi(x) v$ is continuous for any $vin V$. To see this, again choose bases for $V=span(e_1,...,e_n)$, $W=span(u_1,...,u_m)$, then $Phi(x)$ is a matrix valued function $x mapsto A(x)=( a_i,j(x) )$, and $x mapsto A(x)e_i$ just selects the $i$-th column of this matrix.

So to show continuity of $Phi(x)$ from 2 we just observe that $$x mapsto phi(x,v) mapsto pr_2 (phi(x,v) ) = Phi(x)v$$ is continuous for any $v in V$.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • may you elaborate on 3? I don't see how your point explains the equivalence.
    – Cyryl L.
    Aug 20 at 0:18










  • Also, if we were using 2 for $Phi(x)$, should not the first map be $$X rightarrow X times V$$ given by $x mapsto (x,v)$?
    – Cyryl L.
    Aug 20 at 1:42












up vote
1
down vote



accepted







up vote
1
down vote



accepted






  1. Since $V,W$ are finite dimensional vector spaces, $Hom(V,W)$ is itself a finite dimensional vector space. Thus after choice of any bases for $V$ and $W$, $Hom(V,W)$ is identified with $mathbbR^nm$, and the standard Euclidean metric defines the "usual topology" (two matrices are "close" to each other, if their components are "close") . Then it is a standard exercise to show that topologies arising from norms on finite dimensional vector spaces are all equivalent.

  2. $Phi(x)$ is defined as follows: vector $v in V$ is mapped to $W$ via the following composition: $$V to X times V xrightarrowphi X times W xrightarrowpr_2 W$$
    $$v mapsto (x,v) mapsto phi(x,v)=(x, Phi(x)v) mapsto Phi(x)v$$which is linear because of fiberwise linearity of $phi$.

  3. To show that $Phi(x)$ is continuous, use the fact that map $Phi: X to Hom(V,W)$ is continuous iff $ev_v: X to W$ defined by $x mapsto Phi(x) v$ is continuous for any $vin V$. To see this, again choose bases for $V=span(e_1,...,e_n)$, $W=span(u_1,...,u_m)$, then $Phi(x)$ is a matrix valued function $x mapsto A(x)=( a_i,j(x) )$, and $x mapsto A(x)e_i$ just selects the $i$-th column of this matrix.

So to show continuity of $Phi(x)$ from 2 we just observe that $$x mapsto phi(x,v) mapsto pr_2 (phi(x,v) ) = Phi(x)v$$ is continuous for any $v in V$.






share|cite|improve this answer












  1. Since $V,W$ are finite dimensional vector spaces, $Hom(V,W)$ is itself a finite dimensional vector space. Thus after choice of any bases for $V$ and $W$, $Hom(V,W)$ is identified with $mathbbR^nm$, and the standard Euclidean metric defines the "usual topology" (two matrices are "close" to each other, if their components are "close") . Then it is a standard exercise to show that topologies arising from norms on finite dimensional vector spaces are all equivalent.

  2. $Phi(x)$ is defined as follows: vector $v in V$ is mapped to $W$ via the following composition: $$V to X times V xrightarrowphi X times W xrightarrowpr_2 W$$
    $$v mapsto (x,v) mapsto phi(x,v)=(x, Phi(x)v) mapsto Phi(x)v$$which is linear because of fiberwise linearity of $phi$.

  3. To show that $Phi(x)$ is continuous, use the fact that map $Phi: X to Hom(V,W)$ is continuous iff $ev_v: X to W$ defined by $x mapsto Phi(x) v$ is continuous for any $vin V$. To see this, again choose bases for $V=span(e_1,...,e_n)$, $W=span(u_1,...,u_m)$, then $Phi(x)$ is a matrix valued function $x mapsto A(x)=( a_i,j(x) )$, and $x mapsto A(x)e_i$ just selects the $i$-th column of this matrix.

So to show continuity of $Phi(x)$ from 2 we just observe that $$x mapsto phi(x,v) mapsto pr_2 (phi(x,v) ) = Phi(x)v$$ is continuous for any $v in V$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Aug 19 at 12:47









Bananeen

631312




631312











  • may you elaborate on 3? I don't see how your point explains the equivalence.
    – Cyryl L.
    Aug 20 at 0:18










  • Also, if we were using 2 for $Phi(x)$, should not the first map be $$X rightarrow X times V$$ given by $x mapsto (x,v)$?
    – Cyryl L.
    Aug 20 at 1:42
















  • may you elaborate on 3? I don't see how your point explains the equivalence.
    – Cyryl L.
    Aug 20 at 0:18










  • Also, if we were using 2 for $Phi(x)$, should not the first map be $$X rightarrow X times V$$ given by $x mapsto (x,v)$?
    – Cyryl L.
    Aug 20 at 1:42















may you elaborate on 3? I don't see how your point explains the equivalence.
– Cyryl L.
Aug 20 at 0:18




may you elaborate on 3? I don't see how your point explains the equivalence.
– Cyryl L.
Aug 20 at 0:18












Also, if we were using 2 for $Phi(x)$, should not the first map be $$X rightarrow X times V$$ given by $x mapsto (x,v)$?
– Cyryl L.
Aug 20 at 1:42




Also, if we were using 2 for $Phi(x)$, should not the first map be $$X rightarrow X times V$$ given by $x mapsto (x,v)$?
– Cyryl L.
Aug 20 at 1:42












 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2887553%2fatiyahs-k-theory-pg-4%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

Mutual Information Always Non-negative

Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?