Show That $e^x$ and $e^-x$ are Linearly Independent

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
-3
down vote

favorite
1












To test for linear independence, let $$c_1e^x+c_2e^-x=0$$
Where $c_1$ and $c_2$ must equal $0$ for the two functions to be demonstrated to be linearly independent.



So for $x=0$: $$c_1=-c_2$$
And for $x=ln(1)$: $$c_1 = c_2$$
For $c_1$ to equal both $c_2$ and $-c_2$ requires $c_1$ to equal $0$, thus $c_2$ also equals $0$.



Is this sufficient to demonstrate linear independence?







share|cite|improve this question






















  • Your attempt makes no sense. $ln(1) = 0$...
    – user21820
    Aug 23 at 14:35














up vote
-3
down vote

favorite
1












To test for linear independence, let $$c_1e^x+c_2e^-x=0$$
Where $c_1$ and $c_2$ must equal $0$ for the two functions to be demonstrated to be linearly independent.



So for $x=0$: $$c_1=-c_2$$
And for $x=ln(1)$: $$c_1 = c_2$$
For $c_1$ to equal both $c_2$ and $-c_2$ requires $c_1$ to equal $0$, thus $c_2$ also equals $0$.



Is this sufficient to demonstrate linear independence?







share|cite|improve this question






















  • Your attempt makes no sense. $ln(1) = 0$...
    – user21820
    Aug 23 at 14:35












up vote
-3
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
-3
down vote

favorite
1






1





To test for linear independence, let $$c_1e^x+c_2e^-x=0$$
Where $c_1$ and $c_2$ must equal $0$ for the two functions to be demonstrated to be linearly independent.



So for $x=0$: $$c_1=-c_2$$
And for $x=ln(1)$: $$c_1 = c_2$$
For $c_1$ to equal both $c_2$ and $-c_2$ requires $c_1$ to equal $0$, thus $c_2$ also equals $0$.



Is this sufficient to demonstrate linear independence?







share|cite|improve this question














To test for linear independence, let $$c_1e^x+c_2e^-x=0$$
Where $c_1$ and $c_2$ must equal $0$ for the two functions to be demonstrated to be linearly independent.



So for $x=0$: $$c_1=-c_2$$
And for $x=ln(1)$: $$c_1 = c_2$$
For $c_1$ to equal both $c_2$ and $-c_2$ requires $c_1$ to equal $0$, thus $c_2$ also equals $0$.



Is this sufficient to demonstrate linear independence?









share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 22 at 23:49

























asked Aug 19 at 2:59









Alessandro Verniani

406




406











  • Your attempt makes no sense. $ln(1) = 0$...
    – user21820
    Aug 23 at 14:35
















  • Your attempt makes no sense. $ln(1) = 0$...
    – user21820
    Aug 23 at 14:35















Your attempt makes no sense. $ln(1) = 0$...
– user21820
Aug 23 at 14:35




Your attempt makes no sense. $ln(1) = 0$...
– user21820
Aug 23 at 14:35










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote



accepted










Let $x$ be another value. For example, let $x=1$ and you will have $$c_1e+c_2e^-1=0$$



with that you can solve for $c_1$ and $c_2$ uniquely and they are zero or show the determinant of the corresponding matrix is non-zero.



$$beginbmatrixe & e^-1 \ 1 & 1 endbmatrix beginbmatrix c_1 \ c_2endbmatrix= beginbmatrix 0 \ 0endbmatrix$$






share|cite|improve this answer



























    up vote
    2
    down vote













    For $x=Ln(2)$, $2c_1+1over 2c_2=0$, with $c_1+c_2=0$ you deduce the result.






    share|cite|improve this answer




















    • Do you deduce the result by plugging in $c_1=-c_2$ such that $2c_1-0.5c_1=0$, meaning $1.5c_1=0$ and thus that $c_1=0=c_2$?
      – Alessandro Verniani
      Aug 19 at 3:14

















    up vote
    2
    down vote













    Wronskian of $e^x$ and $e^-x$:



    $$beginvmatrix
    e^x&e^-x\
    e^x&-e^-x\endvmatrix=-2neq 0$$so.....?






    share|cite|improve this answer




















      Your Answer




      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: false,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );








       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2887312%2fshow-that-ex-and-e-x-are-linearly-independent%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest






























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      4
      down vote



      accepted










      Let $x$ be another value. For example, let $x=1$ and you will have $$c_1e+c_2e^-1=0$$



      with that you can solve for $c_1$ and $c_2$ uniquely and they are zero or show the determinant of the corresponding matrix is non-zero.



      $$beginbmatrixe & e^-1 \ 1 & 1 endbmatrix beginbmatrix c_1 \ c_2endbmatrix= beginbmatrix 0 \ 0endbmatrix$$






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        up vote
        4
        down vote



        accepted










        Let $x$ be another value. For example, let $x=1$ and you will have $$c_1e+c_2e^-1=0$$



        with that you can solve for $c_1$ and $c_2$ uniquely and they are zero or show the determinant of the corresponding matrix is non-zero.



        $$beginbmatrixe & e^-1 \ 1 & 1 endbmatrix beginbmatrix c_1 \ c_2endbmatrix= beginbmatrix 0 \ 0endbmatrix$$






        share|cite|improve this answer






















          up vote
          4
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          4
          down vote



          accepted






          Let $x$ be another value. For example, let $x=1$ and you will have $$c_1e+c_2e^-1=0$$



          with that you can solve for $c_1$ and $c_2$ uniquely and they are zero or show the determinant of the corresponding matrix is non-zero.



          $$beginbmatrixe & e^-1 \ 1 & 1 endbmatrix beginbmatrix c_1 \ c_2endbmatrix= beginbmatrix 0 \ 0endbmatrix$$






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Let $x$ be another value. For example, let $x=1$ and you will have $$c_1e+c_2e^-1=0$$



          with that you can solve for $c_1$ and $c_2$ uniquely and they are zero or show the determinant of the corresponding matrix is non-zero.



          $$beginbmatrixe & e^-1 \ 1 & 1 endbmatrix beginbmatrix c_1 \ c_2endbmatrix= beginbmatrix 0 \ 0endbmatrix$$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Aug 19 at 3:03









          Siong Thye Goh

          79.7k145299




          79.7k145299




















              up vote
              2
              down vote













              For $x=Ln(2)$, $2c_1+1over 2c_2=0$, with $c_1+c_2=0$ you deduce the result.






              share|cite|improve this answer




















              • Do you deduce the result by plugging in $c_1=-c_2$ such that $2c_1-0.5c_1=0$, meaning $1.5c_1=0$ and thus that $c_1=0=c_2$?
                – Alessandro Verniani
                Aug 19 at 3:14














              up vote
              2
              down vote













              For $x=Ln(2)$, $2c_1+1over 2c_2=0$, with $c_1+c_2=0$ you deduce the result.






              share|cite|improve this answer




















              • Do you deduce the result by plugging in $c_1=-c_2$ such that $2c_1-0.5c_1=0$, meaning $1.5c_1=0$ and thus that $c_1=0=c_2$?
                – Alessandro Verniani
                Aug 19 at 3:14












              up vote
              2
              down vote










              up vote
              2
              down vote









              For $x=Ln(2)$, $2c_1+1over 2c_2=0$, with $c_1+c_2=0$ you deduce the result.






              share|cite|improve this answer












              For $x=Ln(2)$, $2c_1+1over 2c_2=0$, with $c_1+c_2=0$ you deduce the result.







              share|cite|improve this answer












              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer










              answered Aug 19 at 3:03









              Tsemo Aristide

              51.8k11244




              51.8k11244











              • Do you deduce the result by plugging in $c_1=-c_2$ such that $2c_1-0.5c_1=0$, meaning $1.5c_1=0$ and thus that $c_1=0=c_2$?
                – Alessandro Verniani
                Aug 19 at 3:14
















              • Do you deduce the result by plugging in $c_1=-c_2$ such that $2c_1-0.5c_1=0$, meaning $1.5c_1=0$ and thus that $c_1=0=c_2$?
                – Alessandro Verniani
                Aug 19 at 3:14















              Do you deduce the result by plugging in $c_1=-c_2$ such that $2c_1-0.5c_1=0$, meaning $1.5c_1=0$ and thus that $c_1=0=c_2$?
              – Alessandro Verniani
              Aug 19 at 3:14




              Do you deduce the result by plugging in $c_1=-c_2$ such that $2c_1-0.5c_1=0$, meaning $1.5c_1=0$ and thus that $c_1=0=c_2$?
              – Alessandro Verniani
              Aug 19 at 3:14










              up vote
              2
              down vote













              Wronskian of $e^x$ and $e^-x$:



              $$beginvmatrix
              e^x&e^-x\
              e^x&-e^-x\endvmatrix=-2neq 0$$so.....?






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                up vote
                2
                down vote













                Wronskian of $e^x$ and $e^-x$:



                $$beginvmatrix
                e^x&e^-x\
                e^x&-e^-x\endvmatrix=-2neq 0$$so.....?






                share|cite|improve this answer






















                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote









                  Wronskian of $e^x$ and $e^-x$:



                  $$beginvmatrix
                  e^x&e^-x\
                  e^x&-e^-x\endvmatrix=-2neq 0$$so.....?






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  Wronskian of $e^x$ and $e^-x$:



                  $$beginvmatrix
                  e^x&e^-x\
                  e^x&-e^-x\endvmatrix=-2neq 0$$so.....?







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Aug 19 at 3:17









                  Chinnapparaj R

                  1,859317




                  1,859317






















                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded


























                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2887312%2fshow-that-ex-and-e-x-are-linearly-independent%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest













































































                      這個網誌中的熱門文章

                      tkz-euclide: tkzDrawCircle[R] not working

                      How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

                      1st Magritte Awards