Proving an entire function with constant imaginary part on closed unit disc is constant on the whole $mathbb C$ without identity principle
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
-2
down vote
favorite
A First Course in Complex Analysis by Matthias Beck, Gerald Marchesi, Dennis Pixton, and Lucas Sabalka Exer 8.24
(Exer 8.24) If $f: mathbb C to mathbb C$ is entire and $Im(f)$ is constant on closed unit disc $z$, then $f$ is constant on $mathbb C$.
In OSU course here, there's a proof of Exer 8.24 above where the proof makes use of the Identity Principle. I think I can prove alternatively by modifying the proof of Liouville's Thm instead of using the Identity Principle. I attempt my alternative proof as follows.
Question: What mistakes, if any, have I made, and why?
Pf:
By Cauchy-Riemann, $f equiv: K$ is constant on closed unit disc. It remains to show $f equiv: K$ on the rest of $mathbb C$.
Consider any path $gamma := subset mathbb C, w in mathbb C, R > 0$. We have by Cauchy's Integral Formula for $f'$ (Formula 5.1) that
$$|f'(w)| = |frac12 pi i int_gamma fracf(z-w)^2 dz| = frac12 pi |int_gamma fracf(z-w)^2 dz|$$
$$ le frac12 pi max_z in gamma|fracf(z-w)^2| textlength(gamma) = frac1not2notpi max_z in gamma|fracf(z-w)^2| not2notpi R$$
$$ = max_z in gamma|fracf(z-w)^2| R = max_z in gammafracf R = max_z in gammafracfR^2 R = max_z in gammafracfR = max_z in gammafracKR = fracKR$$
$$therefore, |f'(w)| = lim_R to infty |f'(w)| le lim_R to infty fracKR = 0 forall w in mathbb C implies f'(w) = 0 forall w in mathbb C$$
$therefore,$ by a theorem in the textbook (Thm 2.17), $f equiv: K$, not only in closed unit disc, but also on the whole $mathbb C$. QED
calculus integration complex-analysis limits proof-verification
add a comment |Â
up vote
-2
down vote
favorite
A First Course in Complex Analysis by Matthias Beck, Gerald Marchesi, Dennis Pixton, and Lucas Sabalka Exer 8.24
(Exer 8.24) If $f: mathbb C to mathbb C$ is entire and $Im(f)$ is constant on closed unit disc $z$, then $f$ is constant on $mathbb C$.
In OSU course here, there's a proof of Exer 8.24 above where the proof makes use of the Identity Principle. I think I can prove alternatively by modifying the proof of Liouville's Thm instead of using the Identity Principle. I attempt my alternative proof as follows.
Question: What mistakes, if any, have I made, and why?
Pf:
By Cauchy-Riemann, $f equiv: K$ is constant on closed unit disc. It remains to show $f equiv: K$ on the rest of $mathbb C$.
Consider any path $gamma := subset mathbb C, w in mathbb C, R > 0$. We have by Cauchy's Integral Formula for $f'$ (Formula 5.1) that
$$|f'(w)| = |frac12 pi i int_gamma fracf(z-w)^2 dz| = frac12 pi |int_gamma fracf(z-w)^2 dz|$$
$$ le frac12 pi max_z in gamma|fracf(z-w)^2| textlength(gamma) = frac1not2notpi max_z in gamma|fracf(z-w)^2| not2notpi R$$
$$ = max_z in gamma|fracf(z-w)^2| R = max_z in gammafracf R = max_z in gammafracfR^2 R = max_z in gammafracfR = max_z in gammafracKR = fracKR$$
$$therefore, |f'(w)| = lim_R to infty |f'(w)| le lim_R to infty fracKR = 0 forall w in mathbb C implies f'(w) = 0 forall w in mathbb C$$
$therefore,$ by a theorem in the textbook (Thm 2.17), $f equiv: K$, not only in closed unit disc, but also on the whole $mathbb C$. QED
calculus integration complex-analysis limits proof-verification
1
If you are happy with Taylor's theorem in the complex plane, the the power series $sum_n f^(n)(0) z^n/n!$ converges to $f$ everywhere, but that's a constant.
â Lord Shark the Unknown
Aug 12 at 9:28
@LordSharktheUnknown Thanks. What do you mean please? It seems $$sum_n fracf^(n)(0)z^nn! = f(z) forall z in mathbb C$$ sooo if $f$ is constant on closed unit disc $z$, then $sum_n fracf^(n)(0)z^nn!$ is constant on the closed unit disc $z$ with the same value. Sooo then what? What is the 'that' in 'but that's a constant' ?
â BCLC
Aug 12 at 9:44
add a comment |Â
up vote
-2
down vote
favorite
up vote
-2
down vote
favorite
A First Course in Complex Analysis by Matthias Beck, Gerald Marchesi, Dennis Pixton, and Lucas Sabalka Exer 8.24
(Exer 8.24) If $f: mathbb C to mathbb C$ is entire and $Im(f)$ is constant on closed unit disc $z$, then $f$ is constant on $mathbb C$.
In OSU course here, there's a proof of Exer 8.24 above where the proof makes use of the Identity Principle. I think I can prove alternatively by modifying the proof of Liouville's Thm instead of using the Identity Principle. I attempt my alternative proof as follows.
Question: What mistakes, if any, have I made, and why?
Pf:
By Cauchy-Riemann, $f equiv: K$ is constant on closed unit disc. It remains to show $f equiv: K$ on the rest of $mathbb C$.
Consider any path $gamma := subset mathbb C, w in mathbb C, R > 0$. We have by Cauchy's Integral Formula for $f'$ (Formula 5.1) that
$$|f'(w)| = |frac12 pi i int_gamma fracf(z-w)^2 dz| = frac12 pi |int_gamma fracf(z-w)^2 dz|$$
$$ le frac12 pi max_z in gamma|fracf(z-w)^2| textlength(gamma) = frac1not2notpi max_z in gamma|fracf(z-w)^2| not2notpi R$$
$$ = max_z in gamma|fracf(z-w)^2| R = max_z in gammafracf R = max_z in gammafracfR^2 R = max_z in gammafracfR = max_z in gammafracKR = fracKR$$
$$therefore, |f'(w)| = lim_R to infty |f'(w)| le lim_R to infty fracKR = 0 forall w in mathbb C implies f'(w) = 0 forall w in mathbb C$$
$therefore,$ by a theorem in the textbook (Thm 2.17), $f equiv: K$, not only in closed unit disc, but also on the whole $mathbb C$. QED
calculus integration complex-analysis limits proof-verification
A First Course in Complex Analysis by Matthias Beck, Gerald Marchesi, Dennis Pixton, and Lucas Sabalka Exer 8.24
(Exer 8.24) If $f: mathbb C to mathbb C$ is entire and $Im(f)$ is constant on closed unit disc $z$, then $f$ is constant on $mathbb C$.
In OSU course here, there's a proof of Exer 8.24 above where the proof makes use of the Identity Principle. I think I can prove alternatively by modifying the proof of Liouville's Thm instead of using the Identity Principle. I attempt my alternative proof as follows.
Question: What mistakes, if any, have I made, and why?
Pf:
By Cauchy-Riemann, $f equiv: K$ is constant on closed unit disc. It remains to show $f equiv: K$ on the rest of $mathbb C$.
Consider any path $gamma := subset mathbb C, w in mathbb C, R > 0$. We have by Cauchy's Integral Formula for $f'$ (Formula 5.1) that
$$|f'(w)| = |frac12 pi i int_gamma fracf(z-w)^2 dz| = frac12 pi |int_gamma fracf(z-w)^2 dz|$$
$$ le frac12 pi max_z in gamma|fracf(z-w)^2| textlength(gamma) = frac1not2notpi max_z in gamma|fracf(z-w)^2| not2notpi R$$
$$ = max_z in gamma|fracf(z-w)^2| R = max_z in gammafracf R = max_z in gammafracfR^2 R = max_z in gammafracfR = max_z in gammafracKR = fracKR$$
$$therefore, |f'(w)| = lim_R to infty |f'(w)| le lim_R to infty fracKR = 0 forall w in mathbb C implies f'(w) = 0 forall w in mathbb C$$
$therefore,$ by a theorem in the textbook (Thm 2.17), $f equiv: K$, not only in closed unit disc, but also on the whole $mathbb C$. QED
calculus integration complex-analysis limits proof-verification
edited Aug 16 at 8:02
asked Aug 12 at 7:57
BCLC
6,81822073
6,81822073
1
If you are happy with Taylor's theorem in the complex plane, the the power series $sum_n f^(n)(0) z^n/n!$ converges to $f$ everywhere, but that's a constant.
â Lord Shark the Unknown
Aug 12 at 9:28
@LordSharktheUnknown Thanks. What do you mean please? It seems $$sum_n fracf^(n)(0)z^nn! = f(z) forall z in mathbb C$$ sooo if $f$ is constant on closed unit disc $z$, then $sum_n fracf^(n)(0)z^nn!$ is constant on the closed unit disc $z$ with the same value. Sooo then what? What is the 'that' in 'but that's a constant' ?
â BCLC
Aug 12 at 9:44
add a comment |Â
1
If you are happy with Taylor's theorem in the complex plane, the the power series $sum_n f^(n)(0) z^n/n!$ converges to $f$ everywhere, but that's a constant.
â Lord Shark the Unknown
Aug 12 at 9:28
@LordSharktheUnknown Thanks. What do you mean please? It seems $$sum_n fracf^(n)(0)z^nn! = f(z) forall z in mathbb C$$ sooo if $f$ is constant on closed unit disc $z$, then $sum_n fracf^(n)(0)z^nn!$ is constant on the closed unit disc $z$ with the same value. Sooo then what? What is the 'that' in 'but that's a constant' ?
â BCLC
Aug 12 at 9:44
1
1
If you are happy with Taylor's theorem in the complex plane, the the power series $sum_n f^(n)(0) z^n/n!$ converges to $f$ everywhere, but that's a constant.
â Lord Shark the Unknown
Aug 12 at 9:28
If you are happy with Taylor's theorem in the complex plane, the the power series $sum_n f^(n)(0) z^n/n!$ converges to $f$ everywhere, but that's a constant.
â Lord Shark the Unknown
Aug 12 at 9:28
@LordSharktheUnknown Thanks. What do you mean please? It seems $$sum_n fracf^(n)(0)z^nn! = f(z) forall z in mathbb C$$ sooo if $f$ is constant on closed unit disc $z$, then $sum_n fracf^(n)(0)z^nn!$ is constant on the closed unit disc $z$ with the same value. Sooo then what? What is the 'that' in 'but that's a constant' ?
â BCLC
Aug 12 at 9:44
@LordSharktheUnknown Thanks. What do you mean please? It seems $$sum_n fracf^(n)(0)z^nn! = f(z) forall z in mathbb C$$ sooo if $f$ is constant on closed unit disc $z$, then $sum_n fracf^(n)(0)z^nn!$ is constant on the closed unit disc $z$ with the same value. Sooo then what? What is the 'that' in 'but that's a constant' ?
â BCLC
Aug 12 at 9:44
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Here is another approach that uses the open mapping theorem.
Since $B(0,1)$ is open and $f$ is analytic, if $f$ is non constant, then $f(B(0,1))$ is open.
However, the set $x+iy$ is not open, hence $f$
must be a constant.
1
Thanks copper.hat! I made an edit to see if I understand right. I don't think this text explicitly has open mapping theorem.
â BCLC
Aug 12 at 8:21
2
That is a pity, I think it is one of the more useful characteristics of analytic functions :-(.
â copper.hat
Aug 12 at 8:25
1
Thanks for the info copper.hat. I expect I will encounter this in higher complex analysis.
â BCLC
Aug 12 at 8:26
2
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_mapping_theorem_(complex_analysis)
â copper.hat
Aug 12 at 8:27
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
The mistake is
$$max_z in gammafracfR = max_z in gammafracKR$$
We know that $f=|f|equiv:K$ on closed unit disc, so including the unit circle. How do we know that $f=|f|equiv:K$ on some $gamma$ seemingly pulled out of a hat?
It seems that modifying Liouville's Thm will not work as it did (and should) for some exercises in Ch5. Instead, we prove by Identity Principle (Principle 8.15) as in the OSU homework:
Pf using Identity Principle (Principle 8.15):
After proving that $f$ is constant on closed unit disc, consider $g: mathbb C to mathbb C$ s.t. $g(z) := f(z) - K$. Observe that $g$ is entire and zero on closed unit disc. Now consider a sequence of distinct complex numbers $a_n_n=1^infty$ in the closed unit disc that converges to a complex number $a$ in the closed unit disc. Observe that $g(a_n)=0 forall n in mathbb N$. $because mathbb C$ is a region, by Identity Principle (Principle 8.15), $g equiv 0$ on $mathbb C$. $therefore, f(z) equiv K$ on $mathbb C$.
QED
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Here is another approach that uses the open mapping theorem.
Since $B(0,1)$ is open and $f$ is analytic, if $f$ is non constant, then $f(B(0,1))$ is open.
However, the set $x+iy$ is not open, hence $f$
must be a constant.
1
Thanks copper.hat! I made an edit to see if I understand right. I don't think this text explicitly has open mapping theorem.
â BCLC
Aug 12 at 8:21
2
That is a pity, I think it is one of the more useful characteristics of analytic functions :-(.
â copper.hat
Aug 12 at 8:25
1
Thanks for the info copper.hat. I expect I will encounter this in higher complex analysis.
â BCLC
Aug 12 at 8:26
2
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_mapping_theorem_(complex_analysis)
â copper.hat
Aug 12 at 8:27
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Here is another approach that uses the open mapping theorem.
Since $B(0,1)$ is open and $f$ is analytic, if $f$ is non constant, then $f(B(0,1))$ is open.
However, the set $x+iy$ is not open, hence $f$
must be a constant.
1
Thanks copper.hat! I made an edit to see if I understand right. I don't think this text explicitly has open mapping theorem.
â BCLC
Aug 12 at 8:21
2
That is a pity, I think it is one of the more useful characteristics of analytic functions :-(.
â copper.hat
Aug 12 at 8:25
1
Thanks for the info copper.hat. I expect I will encounter this in higher complex analysis.
â BCLC
Aug 12 at 8:26
2
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_mapping_theorem_(complex_analysis)
â copper.hat
Aug 12 at 8:27
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Here is another approach that uses the open mapping theorem.
Since $B(0,1)$ is open and $f$ is analytic, if $f$ is non constant, then $f(B(0,1))$ is open.
However, the set $x+iy$ is not open, hence $f$
must be a constant.
Here is another approach that uses the open mapping theorem.
Since $B(0,1)$ is open and $f$ is analytic, if $f$ is non constant, then $f(B(0,1))$ is open.
However, the set $x+iy$ is not open, hence $f$
must be a constant.
edited Aug 12 at 8:21
BCLC
6,81822073
6,81822073
answered Aug 12 at 8:10
copper.hat
123k557156
123k557156
1
Thanks copper.hat! I made an edit to see if I understand right. I don't think this text explicitly has open mapping theorem.
â BCLC
Aug 12 at 8:21
2
That is a pity, I think it is one of the more useful characteristics of analytic functions :-(.
â copper.hat
Aug 12 at 8:25
1
Thanks for the info copper.hat. I expect I will encounter this in higher complex analysis.
â BCLC
Aug 12 at 8:26
2
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_mapping_theorem_(complex_analysis)
â copper.hat
Aug 12 at 8:27
add a comment |Â
1
Thanks copper.hat! I made an edit to see if I understand right. I don't think this text explicitly has open mapping theorem.
â BCLC
Aug 12 at 8:21
2
That is a pity, I think it is one of the more useful characteristics of analytic functions :-(.
â copper.hat
Aug 12 at 8:25
1
Thanks for the info copper.hat. I expect I will encounter this in higher complex analysis.
â BCLC
Aug 12 at 8:26
2
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_mapping_theorem_(complex_analysis)
â copper.hat
Aug 12 at 8:27
1
1
Thanks copper.hat! I made an edit to see if I understand right. I don't think this text explicitly has open mapping theorem.
â BCLC
Aug 12 at 8:21
Thanks copper.hat! I made an edit to see if I understand right. I don't think this text explicitly has open mapping theorem.
â BCLC
Aug 12 at 8:21
2
2
That is a pity, I think it is one of the more useful characteristics of analytic functions :-(.
â copper.hat
Aug 12 at 8:25
That is a pity, I think it is one of the more useful characteristics of analytic functions :-(.
â copper.hat
Aug 12 at 8:25
1
1
Thanks for the info copper.hat. I expect I will encounter this in higher complex analysis.
â BCLC
Aug 12 at 8:26
Thanks for the info copper.hat. I expect I will encounter this in higher complex analysis.
â BCLC
Aug 12 at 8:26
2
2
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_mapping_theorem_(complex_analysis)
â copper.hat
Aug 12 at 8:27
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_mapping_theorem_(complex_analysis)
â copper.hat
Aug 12 at 8:27
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
The mistake is
$$max_z in gammafracfR = max_z in gammafracKR$$
We know that $f=|f|equiv:K$ on closed unit disc, so including the unit circle. How do we know that $f=|f|equiv:K$ on some $gamma$ seemingly pulled out of a hat?
It seems that modifying Liouville's Thm will not work as it did (and should) for some exercises in Ch5. Instead, we prove by Identity Principle (Principle 8.15) as in the OSU homework:
Pf using Identity Principle (Principle 8.15):
After proving that $f$ is constant on closed unit disc, consider $g: mathbb C to mathbb C$ s.t. $g(z) := f(z) - K$. Observe that $g$ is entire and zero on closed unit disc. Now consider a sequence of distinct complex numbers $a_n_n=1^infty$ in the closed unit disc that converges to a complex number $a$ in the closed unit disc. Observe that $g(a_n)=0 forall n in mathbb N$. $because mathbb C$ is a region, by Identity Principle (Principle 8.15), $g equiv 0$ on $mathbb C$. $therefore, f(z) equiv K$ on $mathbb C$.
QED
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
The mistake is
$$max_z in gammafracfR = max_z in gammafracKR$$
We know that $f=|f|equiv:K$ on closed unit disc, so including the unit circle. How do we know that $f=|f|equiv:K$ on some $gamma$ seemingly pulled out of a hat?
It seems that modifying Liouville's Thm will not work as it did (and should) for some exercises in Ch5. Instead, we prove by Identity Principle (Principle 8.15) as in the OSU homework:
Pf using Identity Principle (Principle 8.15):
After proving that $f$ is constant on closed unit disc, consider $g: mathbb C to mathbb C$ s.t. $g(z) := f(z) - K$. Observe that $g$ is entire and zero on closed unit disc. Now consider a sequence of distinct complex numbers $a_n_n=1^infty$ in the closed unit disc that converges to a complex number $a$ in the closed unit disc. Observe that $g(a_n)=0 forall n in mathbb N$. $because mathbb C$ is a region, by Identity Principle (Principle 8.15), $g equiv 0$ on $mathbb C$. $therefore, f(z) equiv K$ on $mathbb C$.
QED
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
The mistake is
$$max_z in gammafracfR = max_z in gammafracKR$$
We know that $f=|f|equiv:K$ on closed unit disc, so including the unit circle. How do we know that $f=|f|equiv:K$ on some $gamma$ seemingly pulled out of a hat?
It seems that modifying Liouville's Thm will not work as it did (and should) for some exercises in Ch5. Instead, we prove by Identity Principle (Principle 8.15) as in the OSU homework:
Pf using Identity Principle (Principle 8.15):
After proving that $f$ is constant on closed unit disc, consider $g: mathbb C to mathbb C$ s.t. $g(z) := f(z) - K$. Observe that $g$ is entire and zero on closed unit disc. Now consider a sequence of distinct complex numbers $a_n_n=1^infty$ in the closed unit disc that converges to a complex number $a$ in the closed unit disc. Observe that $g(a_n)=0 forall n in mathbb N$. $because mathbb C$ is a region, by Identity Principle (Principle 8.15), $g equiv 0$ on $mathbb C$. $therefore, f(z) equiv K$ on $mathbb C$.
QED
The mistake is
$$max_z in gammafracfR = max_z in gammafracKR$$
We know that $f=|f|equiv:K$ on closed unit disc, so including the unit circle. How do we know that $f=|f|equiv:K$ on some $gamma$ seemingly pulled out of a hat?
It seems that modifying Liouville's Thm will not work as it did (and should) for some exercises in Ch5. Instead, we prove by Identity Principle (Principle 8.15) as in the OSU homework:
Pf using Identity Principle (Principle 8.15):
After proving that $f$ is constant on closed unit disc, consider $g: mathbb C to mathbb C$ s.t. $g(z) := f(z) - K$. Observe that $g$ is entire and zero on closed unit disc. Now consider a sequence of distinct complex numbers $a_n_n=1^infty$ in the closed unit disc that converges to a complex number $a$ in the closed unit disc. Observe that $g(a_n)=0 forall n in mathbb N$. $because mathbb C$ is a region, by Identity Principle (Principle 8.15), $g equiv 0$ on $mathbb C$. $therefore, f(z) equiv K$ on $mathbb C$.
QED
edited Aug 16 at 8:03
answered Aug 12 at 7:57
BCLC
6,81822073
6,81822073
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2880082%2fproving-an-entire-function-with-constant-imaginary-part-on-closed-unit-disc-is-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
1
If you are happy with Taylor's theorem in the complex plane, the the power series $sum_n f^(n)(0) z^n/n!$ converges to $f$ everywhere, but that's a constant.
â Lord Shark the Unknown
Aug 12 at 9:28
@LordSharktheUnknown Thanks. What do you mean please? It seems $$sum_n fracf^(n)(0)z^nn! = f(z) forall z in mathbb C$$ sooo if $f$ is constant on closed unit disc $z$, then $sum_n fracf^(n)(0)z^nn!$ is constant on the closed unit disc $z$ with the same value. Sooo then what? What is the 'that' in 'but that's a constant' ?
â BCLC
Aug 12 at 9:44