Proving an entire function with constant imaginary part on closed unit disc is constant on the whole $mathbb C$ without identity principle

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
-2
down vote

favorite












A First Course in Complex Analysis by Matthias Beck, Gerald Marchesi, Dennis Pixton, and Lucas Sabalka Exer 8.24




(Exer 8.24) If $f: mathbb C to mathbb C$ is entire and $Im(f)$ is constant on closed unit disc $z$, then $f$ is constant on $mathbb C$.




In OSU course here, there's a proof of Exer 8.24 above where the proof makes use of the Identity Principle. I think I can prove alternatively by modifying the proof of Liouville's Thm instead of using the Identity Principle. I attempt my alternative proof as follows.




Question: What mistakes, if any, have I made, and why?




Pf:



By Cauchy-Riemann, $f equiv: K$ is constant on closed unit disc. It remains to show $f equiv: K$ on the rest of $mathbb C$.



Consider any path $gamma := subset mathbb C, w in mathbb C, R > 0$. We have by Cauchy's Integral Formula for $f'$ (Formula 5.1) that



$$|f'(w)| = |frac12 pi i int_gamma fracf(z-w)^2 dz| = frac12 pi |int_gamma fracf(z-w)^2 dz|$$



$$ le frac12 pi max_z in gamma|fracf(z-w)^2| textlength(gamma) = frac1not2notpi max_z in gamma|fracf(z-w)^2| not2notpi R$$



$$ = max_z in gamma|fracf(z-w)^2| R = max_z in gammafracf R = max_z in gammafracfR^2 R = max_z in gammafracfR = max_z in gammafracKR = fracKR$$



$$therefore, |f'(w)| = lim_R to infty |f'(w)| le lim_R to infty fracKR = 0 forall w in mathbb C implies f'(w) = 0 forall w in mathbb C$$



$therefore,$ by a theorem in the textbook (Thm 2.17), $f equiv: K$, not only in closed unit disc, but also on the whole $mathbb C$. QED







share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    If you are happy with Taylor's theorem in the complex plane, the the power series $sum_n f^(n)(0) z^n/n!$ converges to $f$ everywhere, but that's a constant.
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Aug 12 at 9:28










  • @LordSharktheUnknown Thanks. What do you mean please? It seems $$sum_n fracf^(n)(0)z^nn! = f(z) forall z in mathbb C$$ sooo if $f$ is constant on closed unit disc $z$, then $sum_n fracf^(n)(0)z^nn!$ is constant on the closed unit disc $z$ with the same value. Sooo then what? What is the 'that' in 'but that's a constant' ?
    – BCLC
    Aug 12 at 9:44















up vote
-2
down vote

favorite












A First Course in Complex Analysis by Matthias Beck, Gerald Marchesi, Dennis Pixton, and Lucas Sabalka Exer 8.24




(Exer 8.24) If $f: mathbb C to mathbb C$ is entire and $Im(f)$ is constant on closed unit disc $z$, then $f$ is constant on $mathbb C$.




In OSU course here, there's a proof of Exer 8.24 above where the proof makes use of the Identity Principle. I think I can prove alternatively by modifying the proof of Liouville's Thm instead of using the Identity Principle. I attempt my alternative proof as follows.




Question: What mistakes, if any, have I made, and why?




Pf:



By Cauchy-Riemann, $f equiv: K$ is constant on closed unit disc. It remains to show $f equiv: K$ on the rest of $mathbb C$.



Consider any path $gamma := subset mathbb C, w in mathbb C, R > 0$. We have by Cauchy's Integral Formula for $f'$ (Formula 5.1) that



$$|f'(w)| = |frac12 pi i int_gamma fracf(z-w)^2 dz| = frac12 pi |int_gamma fracf(z-w)^2 dz|$$



$$ le frac12 pi max_z in gamma|fracf(z-w)^2| textlength(gamma) = frac1not2notpi max_z in gamma|fracf(z-w)^2| not2notpi R$$



$$ = max_z in gamma|fracf(z-w)^2| R = max_z in gammafracf R = max_z in gammafracfR^2 R = max_z in gammafracfR = max_z in gammafracKR = fracKR$$



$$therefore, |f'(w)| = lim_R to infty |f'(w)| le lim_R to infty fracKR = 0 forall w in mathbb C implies f'(w) = 0 forall w in mathbb C$$



$therefore,$ by a theorem in the textbook (Thm 2.17), $f equiv: K$, not only in closed unit disc, but also on the whole $mathbb C$. QED







share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    If you are happy with Taylor's theorem in the complex plane, the the power series $sum_n f^(n)(0) z^n/n!$ converges to $f$ everywhere, but that's a constant.
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Aug 12 at 9:28










  • @LordSharktheUnknown Thanks. What do you mean please? It seems $$sum_n fracf^(n)(0)z^nn! = f(z) forall z in mathbb C$$ sooo if $f$ is constant on closed unit disc $z$, then $sum_n fracf^(n)(0)z^nn!$ is constant on the closed unit disc $z$ with the same value. Sooo then what? What is the 'that' in 'but that's a constant' ?
    – BCLC
    Aug 12 at 9:44













up vote
-2
down vote

favorite









up vote
-2
down vote

favorite











A First Course in Complex Analysis by Matthias Beck, Gerald Marchesi, Dennis Pixton, and Lucas Sabalka Exer 8.24




(Exer 8.24) If $f: mathbb C to mathbb C$ is entire and $Im(f)$ is constant on closed unit disc $z$, then $f$ is constant on $mathbb C$.




In OSU course here, there's a proof of Exer 8.24 above where the proof makes use of the Identity Principle. I think I can prove alternatively by modifying the proof of Liouville's Thm instead of using the Identity Principle. I attempt my alternative proof as follows.




Question: What mistakes, if any, have I made, and why?




Pf:



By Cauchy-Riemann, $f equiv: K$ is constant on closed unit disc. It remains to show $f equiv: K$ on the rest of $mathbb C$.



Consider any path $gamma := subset mathbb C, w in mathbb C, R > 0$. We have by Cauchy's Integral Formula for $f'$ (Formula 5.1) that



$$|f'(w)| = |frac12 pi i int_gamma fracf(z-w)^2 dz| = frac12 pi |int_gamma fracf(z-w)^2 dz|$$



$$ le frac12 pi max_z in gamma|fracf(z-w)^2| textlength(gamma) = frac1not2notpi max_z in gamma|fracf(z-w)^2| not2notpi R$$



$$ = max_z in gamma|fracf(z-w)^2| R = max_z in gammafracf R = max_z in gammafracfR^2 R = max_z in gammafracfR = max_z in gammafracKR = fracKR$$



$$therefore, |f'(w)| = lim_R to infty |f'(w)| le lim_R to infty fracKR = 0 forall w in mathbb C implies f'(w) = 0 forall w in mathbb C$$



$therefore,$ by a theorem in the textbook (Thm 2.17), $f equiv: K$, not only in closed unit disc, but also on the whole $mathbb C$. QED







share|cite|improve this question














A First Course in Complex Analysis by Matthias Beck, Gerald Marchesi, Dennis Pixton, and Lucas Sabalka Exer 8.24




(Exer 8.24) If $f: mathbb C to mathbb C$ is entire and $Im(f)$ is constant on closed unit disc $z$, then $f$ is constant on $mathbb C$.




In OSU course here, there's a proof of Exer 8.24 above where the proof makes use of the Identity Principle. I think I can prove alternatively by modifying the proof of Liouville's Thm instead of using the Identity Principle. I attempt my alternative proof as follows.




Question: What mistakes, if any, have I made, and why?




Pf:



By Cauchy-Riemann, $f equiv: K$ is constant on closed unit disc. It remains to show $f equiv: K$ on the rest of $mathbb C$.



Consider any path $gamma := subset mathbb C, w in mathbb C, R > 0$. We have by Cauchy's Integral Formula for $f'$ (Formula 5.1) that



$$|f'(w)| = |frac12 pi i int_gamma fracf(z-w)^2 dz| = frac12 pi |int_gamma fracf(z-w)^2 dz|$$



$$ le frac12 pi max_z in gamma|fracf(z-w)^2| textlength(gamma) = frac1not2notpi max_z in gamma|fracf(z-w)^2| not2notpi R$$



$$ = max_z in gamma|fracf(z-w)^2| R = max_z in gammafracf R = max_z in gammafracfR^2 R = max_z in gammafracfR = max_z in gammafracKR = fracKR$$



$$therefore, |f'(w)| = lim_R to infty |f'(w)| le lim_R to infty fracKR = 0 forall w in mathbb C implies f'(w) = 0 forall w in mathbb C$$



$therefore,$ by a theorem in the textbook (Thm 2.17), $f equiv: K$, not only in closed unit disc, but also on the whole $mathbb C$. QED









share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 16 at 8:02

























asked Aug 12 at 7:57









BCLC

6,81822073




6,81822073







  • 1




    If you are happy with Taylor's theorem in the complex plane, the the power series $sum_n f^(n)(0) z^n/n!$ converges to $f$ everywhere, but that's a constant.
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Aug 12 at 9:28










  • @LordSharktheUnknown Thanks. What do you mean please? It seems $$sum_n fracf^(n)(0)z^nn! = f(z) forall z in mathbb C$$ sooo if $f$ is constant on closed unit disc $z$, then $sum_n fracf^(n)(0)z^nn!$ is constant on the closed unit disc $z$ with the same value. Sooo then what? What is the 'that' in 'but that's a constant' ?
    – BCLC
    Aug 12 at 9:44













  • 1




    If you are happy with Taylor's theorem in the complex plane, the the power series $sum_n f^(n)(0) z^n/n!$ converges to $f$ everywhere, but that's a constant.
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Aug 12 at 9:28










  • @LordSharktheUnknown Thanks. What do you mean please? It seems $$sum_n fracf^(n)(0)z^nn! = f(z) forall z in mathbb C$$ sooo if $f$ is constant on closed unit disc $z$, then $sum_n fracf^(n)(0)z^nn!$ is constant on the closed unit disc $z$ with the same value. Sooo then what? What is the 'that' in 'but that's a constant' ?
    – BCLC
    Aug 12 at 9:44








1




1




If you are happy with Taylor's theorem in the complex plane, the the power series $sum_n f^(n)(0) z^n/n!$ converges to $f$ everywhere, but that's a constant.
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Aug 12 at 9:28




If you are happy with Taylor's theorem in the complex plane, the the power series $sum_n f^(n)(0) z^n/n!$ converges to $f$ everywhere, but that's a constant.
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Aug 12 at 9:28












@LordSharktheUnknown Thanks. What do you mean please? It seems $$sum_n fracf^(n)(0)z^nn! = f(z) forall z in mathbb C$$ sooo if $f$ is constant on closed unit disc $z$, then $sum_n fracf^(n)(0)z^nn!$ is constant on the closed unit disc $z$ with the same value. Sooo then what? What is the 'that' in 'but that's a constant' ?
– BCLC
Aug 12 at 9:44





@LordSharktheUnknown Thanks. What do you mean please? It seems $$sum_n fracf^(n)(0)z^nn! = f(z) forall z in mathbb C$$ sooo if $f$ is constant on closed unit disc $z$, then $sum_n fracf^(n)(0)z^nn!$ is constant on the closed unit disc $z$ with the same value. Sooo then what? What is the 'that' in 'but that's a constant' ?
– BCLC
Aug 12 at 9:44











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










Here is another approach that uses the open mapping theorem.



Since $B(0,1)$ is open and $f$ is analytic, if $f$ is non constant, then $f(B(0,1))$ is open.



However, the set $x+iy$ is not open, hence $f$
must be a constant.






share|cite|improve this answer


















  • 1




    Thanks copper.hat! I made an edit to see if I understand right. I don't think this text explicitly has open mapping theorem.
    – BCLC
    Aug 12 at 8:21






  • 2




    That is a pity, I think it is one of the more useful characteristics of analytic functions :-(.
    – copper.hat
    Aug 12 at 8:25







  • 1




    Thanks for the info copper.hat. I expect I will encounter this in higher complex analysis.
    – BCLC
    Aug 12 at 8:26






  • 2




    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_mapping_theorem_(complex_analysis)
    – copper.hat
    Aug 12 at 8:27

















up vote
0
down vote













The mistake is



$$max_z in gammafracfR = max_z in gammafracKR$$



We know that $f=|f|equiv:K$ on closed unit disc, so including the unit circle. How do we know that $f=|f|equiv:K$ on some $gamma$ seemingly pulled out of a hat?



It seems that modifying Liouville's Thm will not work as it did (and should) for some exercises in Ch5. Instead, we prove by Identity Principle (Principle 8.15) as in the OSU homework:



Pf using Identity Principle (Principle 8.15):



After proving that $f$ is constant on closed unit disc, consider $g: mathbb C to mathbb C$ s.t. $g(z) := f(z) - K$. Observe that $g$ is entire and zero on closed unit disc. Now consider a sequence of distinct complex numbers $a_n_n=1^infty$ in the closed unit disc that converges to a complex number $a$ in the closed unit disc. Observe that $g(a_n)=0 forall n in mathbb N$. $because mathbb C$ is a region, by Identity Principle (Principle 8.15), $g equiv 0$ on $mathbb C$. $therefore, f(z) equiv K$ on $mathbb C$.



QED






share|cite|improve this answer






















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );








     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2880082%2fproving-an-entire-function-with-constant-imaginary-part-on-closed-unit-disc-is-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted










    Here is another approach that uses the open mapping theorem.



    Since $B(0,1)$ is open and $f$ is analytic, if $f$ is non constant, then $f(B(0,1))$ is open.



    However, the set $x+iy$ is not open, hence $f$
    must be a constant.






    share|cite|improve this answer


















    • 1




      Thanks copper.hat! I made an edit to see if I understand right. I don't think this text explicitly has open mapping theorem.
      – BCLC
      Aug 12 at 8:21






    • 2




      That is a pity, I think it is one of the more useful characteristics of analytic functions :-(.
      – copper.hat
      Aug 12 at 8:25







    • 1




      Thanks for the info copper.hat. I expect I will encounter this in higher complex analysis.
      – BCLC
      Aug 12 at 8:26






    • 2




      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_mapping_theorem_(complex_analysis)
      – copper.hat
      Aug 12 at 8:27














    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted










    Here is another approach that uses the open mapping theorem.



    Since $B(0,1)$ is open and $f$ is analytic, if $f$ is non constant, then $f(B(0,1))$ is open.



    However, the set $x+iy$ is not open, hence $f$
    must be a constant.






    share|cite|improve this answer


















    • 1




      Thanks copper.hat! I made an edit to see if I understand right. I don't think this text explicitly has open mapping theorem.
      – BCLC
      Aug 12 at 8:21






    • 2




      That is a pity, I think it is one of the more useful characteristics of analytic functions :-(.
      – copper.hat
      Aug 12 at 8:25







    • 1




      Thanks for the info copper.hat. I expect I will encounter this in higher complex analysis.
      – BCLC
      Aug 12 at 8:26






    • 2




      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_mapping_theorem_(complex_analysis)
      – copper.hat
      Aug 12 at 8:27












    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted






    Here is another approach that uses the open mapping theorem.



    Since $B(0,1)$ is open and $f$ is analytic, if $f$ is non constant, then $f(B(0,1))$ is open.



    However, the set $x+iy$ is not open, hence $f$
    must be a constant.






    share|cite|improve this answer














    Here is another approach that uses the open mapping theorem.



    Since $B(0,1)$ is open and $f$ is analytic, if $f$ is non constant, then $f(B(0,1))$ is open.



    However, the set $x+iy$ is not open, hence $f$
    must be a constant.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Aug 12 at 8:21









    BCLC

    6,81822073




    6,81822073










    answered Aug 12 at 8:10









    copper.hat

    123k557156




    123k557156







    • 1




      Thanks copper.hat! I made an edit to see if I understand right. I don't think this text explicitly has open mapping theorem.
      – BCLC
      Aug 12 at 8:21






    • 2




      That is a pity, I think it is one of the more useful characteristics of analytic functions :-(.
      – copper.hat
      Aug 12 at 8:25







    • 1




      Thanks for the info copper.hat. I expect I will encounter this in higher complex analysis.
      – BCLC
      Aug 12 at 8:26






    • 2




      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_mapping_theorem_(complex_analysis)
      – copper.hat
      Aug 12 at 8:27












    • 1




      Thanks copper.hat! I made an edit to see if I understand right. I don't think this text explicitly has open mapping theorem.
      – BCLC
      Aug 12 at 8:21






    • 2




      That is a pity, I think it is one of the more useful characteristics of analytic functions :-(.
      – copper.hat
      Aug 12 at 8:25







    • 1




      Thanks for the info copper.hat. I expect I will encounter this in higher complex analysis.
      – BCLC
      Aug 12 at 8:26






    • 2




      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_mapping_theorem_(complex_analysis)
      – copper.hat
      Aug 12 at 8:27







    1




    1




    Thanks copper.hat! I made an edit to see if I understand right. I don't think this text explicitly has open mapping theorem.
    – BCLC
    Aug 12 at 8:21




    Thanks copper.hat! I made an edit to see if I understand right. I don't think this text explicitly has open mapping theorem.
    – BCLC
    Aug 12 at 8:21




    2




    2




    That is a pity, I think it is one of the more useful characteristics of analytic functions :-(.
    – copper.hat
    Aug 12 at 8:25





    That is a pity, I think it is one of the more useful characteristics of analytic functions :-(.
    – copper.hat
    Aug 12 at 8:25





    1




    1




    Thanks for the info copper.hat. I expect I will encounter this in higher complex analysis.
    – BCLC
    Aug 12 at 8:26




    Thanks for the info copper.hat. I expect I will encounter this in higher complex analysis.
    – BCLC
    Aug 12 at 8:26




    2




    2




    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_mapping_theorem_(complex_analysis)
    – copper.hat
    Aug 12 at 8:27




    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_mapping_theorem_(complex_analysis)
    – copper.hat
    Aug 12 at 8:27










    up vote
    0
    down vote













    The mistake is



    $$max_z in gammafracfR = max_z in gammafracKR$$



    We know that $f=|f|equiv:K$ on closed unit disc, so including the unit circle. How do we know that $f=|f|equiv:K$ on some $gamma$ seemingly pulled out of a hat?



    It seems that modifying Liouville's Thm will not work as it did (and should) for some exercises in Ch5. Instead, we prove by Identity Principle (Principle 8.15) as in the OSU homework:



    Pf using Identity Principle (Principle 8.15):



    After proving that $f$ is constant on closed unit disc, consider $g: mathbb C to mathbb C$ s.t. $g(z) := f(z) - K$. Observe that $g$ is entire and zero on closed unit disc. Now consider a sequence of distinct complex numbers $a_n_n=1^infty$ in the closed unit disc that converges to a complex number $a$ in the closed unit disc. Observe that $g(a_n)=0 forall n in mathbb N$. $because mathbb C$ is a region, by Identity Principle (Principle 8.15), $g equiv 0$ on $mathbb C$. $therefore, f(z) equiv K$ on $mathbb C$.



    QED






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      The mistake is



      $$max_z in gammafracfR = max_z in gammafracKR$$



      We know that $f=|f|equiv:K$ on closed unit disc, so including the unit circle. How do we know that $f=|f|equiv:K$ on some $gamma$ seemingly pulled out of a hat?



      It seems that modifying Liouville's Thm will not work as it did (and should) for some exercises in Ch5. Instead, we prove by Identity Principle (Principle 8.15) as in the OSU homework:



      Pf using Identity Principle (Principle 8.15):



      After proving that $f$ is constant on closed unit disc, consider $g: mathbb C to mathbb C$ s.t. $g(z) := f(z) - K$. Observe that $g$ is entire and zero on closed unit disc. Now consider a sequence of distinct complex numbers $a_n_n=1^infty$ in the closed unit disc that converges to a complex number $a$ in the closed unit disc. Observe that $g(a_n)=0 forall n in mathbb N$. $because mathbb C$ is a region, by Identity Principle (Principle 8.15), $g equiv 0$ on $mathbb C$. $therefore, f(z) equiv K$ on $mathbb C$.



      QED






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        The mistake is



        $$max_z in gammafracfR = max_z in gammafracKR$$



        We know that $f=|f|equiv:K$ on closed unit disc, so including the unit circle. How do we know that $f=|f|equiv:K$ on some $gamma$ seemingly pulled out of a hat?



        It seems that modifying Liouville's Thm will not work as it did (and should) for some exercises in Ch5. Instead, we prove by Identity Principle (Principle 8.15) as in the OSU homework:



        Pf using Identity Principle (Principle 8.15):



        After proving that $f$ is constant on closed unit disc, consider $g: mathbb C to mathbb C$ s.t. $g(z) := f(z) - K$. Observe that $g$ is entire and zero on closed unit disc. Now consider a sequence of distinct complex numbers $a_n_n=1^infty$ in the closed unit disc that converges to a complex number $a$ in the closed unit disc. Observe that $g(a_n)=0 forall n in mathbb N$. $because mathbb C$ is a region, by Identity Principle (Principle 8.15), $g equiv 0$ on $mathbb C$. $therefore, f(z) equiv K$ on $mathbb C$.



        QED






        share|cite|improve this answer














        The mistake is



        $$max_z in gammafracfR = max_z in gammafracKR$$



        We know that $f=|f|equiv:K$ on closed unit disc, so including the unit circle. How do we know that $f=|f|equiv:K$ on some $gamma$ seemingly pulled out of a hat?



        It seems that modifying Liouville's Thm will not work as it did (and should) for some exercises in Ch5. Instead, we prove by Identity Principle (Principle 8.15) as in the OSU homework:



        Pf using Identity Principle (Principle 8.15):



        After proving that $f$ is constant on closed unit disc, consider $g: mathbb C to mathbb C$ s.t. $g(z) := f(z) - K$. Observe that $g$ is entire and zero on closed unit disc. Now consider a sequence of distinct complex numbers $a_n_n=1^infty$ in the closed unit disc that converges to a complex number $a$ in the closed unit disc. Observe that $g(a_n)=0 forall n in mathbb N$. $because mathbb C$ is a region, by Identity Principle (Principle 8.15), $g equiv 0$ on $mathbb C$. $therefore, f(z) equiv K$ on $mathbb C$.



        QED







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Aug 16 at 8:03

























        answered Aug 12 at 7:57









        BCLC

        6,81822073




        6,81822073






















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


























             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2880082%2fproving-an-entire-function-with-constant-imaginary-part-on-closed-unit-disc-is-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            這個網誌中的熱門文章

            How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

            Carbon dioxide

            Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?