If $Fsubset D subset E$ then $D$ must be a field [duplicate]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
6
down vote

favorite
3













This question already has an answer here:



  • Proof that an integral domain that is a finite-dimensional $F$-vector space is in fact a field

    3 answers



Let $F$ a field and $E$ a finite extension of $F$. I need to show that, if $D$ is a integral domain such that $Fsubset Dsubset E$ then, D is a field.



My attempt: As $E$ is a finite extension, it is a algebraic extension. Let $alphain D$, it is sufficient to show that each element of $D$ has a inverse. So, take $alphain D$ so $alpha$ is algebraic over $F$. Suppose that $deg(alpha,F)=n$, then every element of $F(alpha)$ can be written as $a_0+a_1alpha+cdots+a_n-1alpha^n-1$ where $a_iin F$. Therefore, $F(alpha)subset D$ and as $F(alpha)$ is a field and it contains the inverse of $alpha$.



I have troubles with my proof because a don't see where the fact that $D$ is integral domain is important.







share|cite|improve this question












marked as duplicate by Jyrki Lahtonen abstract-algebra
Users with the  abstract-algebra badge can single-handedly close abstract-algebra questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

);
);
);
Aug 12 at 6:38


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.


















    up vote
    6
    down vote

    favorite
    3













    This question already has an answer here:



    • Proof that an integral domain that is a finite-dimensional $F$-vector space is in fact a field

      3 answers



    Let $F$ a field and $E$ a finite extension of $F$. I need to show that, if $D$ is a integral domain such that $Fsubset Dsubset E$ then, D is a field.



    My attempt: As $E$ is a finite extension, it is a algebraic extension. Let $alphain D$, it is sufficient to show that each element of $D$ has a inverse. So, take $alphain D$ so $alpha$ is algebraic over $F$. Suppose that $deg(alpha,F)=n$, then every element of $F(alpha)$ can be written as $a_0+a_1alpha+cdots+a_n-1alpha^n-1$ where $a_iin F$. Therefore, $F(alpha)subset D$ and as $F(alpha)$ is a field and it contains the inverse of $alpha$.



    I have troubles with my proof because a don't see where the fact that $D$ is integral domain is important.







    share|cite|improve this question












    marked as duplicate by Jyrki Lahtonen abstract-algebra
    Users with the  abstract-algebra badge can single-handedly close abstract-algebra questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

    $('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
    var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
    $msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

    $hover.hover(
    function()
    $hover.showInfoMessage('',
    messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
    transient: false,
    position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
    dismissable: false,
    relativeToBody: true
    );
    ,
    function()
    StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

    );
    );
    );
    Aug 12 at 6:38


    This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
















      up vote
      6
      down vote

      favorite
      3









      up vote
      6
      down vote

      favorite
      3






      3






      This question already has an answer here:



      • Proof that an integral domain that is a finite-dimensional $F$-vector space is in fact a field

        3 answers



      Let $F$ a field and $E$ a finite extension of $F$. I need to show that, if $D$ is a integral domain such that $Fsubset Dsubset E$ then, D is a field.



      My attempt: As $E$ is a finite extension, it is a algebraic extension. Let $alphain D$, it is sufficient to show that each element of $D$ has a inverse. So, take $alphain D$ so $alpha$ is algebraic over $F$. Suppose that $deg(alpha,F)=n$, then every element of $F(alpha)$ can be written as $a_0+a_1alpha+cdots+a_n-1alpha^n-1$ where $a_iin F$. Therefore, $F(alpha)subset D$ and as $F(alpha)$ is a field and it contains the inverse of $alpha$.



      I have troubles with my proof because a don't see where the fact that $D$ is integral domain is important.







      share|cite|improve this question













      This question already has an answer here:



      • Proof that an integral domain that is a finite-dimensional $F$-vector space is in fact a field

        3 answers



      Let $F$ a field and $E$ a finite extension of $F$. I need to show that, if $D$ is a integral domain such that $Fsubset Dsubset E$ then, D is a field.



      My attempt: As $E$ is a finite extension, it is a algebraic extension. Let $alphain D$, it is sufficient to show that each element of $D$ has a inverse. So, take $alphain D$ so $alpha$ is algebraic over $F$. Suppose that $deg(alpha,F)=n$, then every element of $F(alpha)$ can be written as $a_0+a_1alpha+cdots+a_n-1alpha^n-1$ where $a_iin F$. Therefore, $F(alpha)subset D$ and as $F(alpha)$ is a field and it contains the inverse of $alpha$.



      I have troubles with my proof because a don't see where the fact that $D$ is integral domain is important.





      This question already has an answer here:



      • Proof that an integral domain that is a finite-dimensional $F$-vector space is in fact a field

        3 answers









      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Aug 12 at 5:08









      Gödel

      1,157319




      1,157319




      marked as duplicate by Jyrki Lahtonen abstract-algebra
      Users with the  abstract-algebra badge can single-handedly close abstract-algebra questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

      $('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
      var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
      $msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

      $hover.hover(
      function()
      $hover.showInfoMessage('',
      messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
      transient: false,
      position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
      dismissable: false,
      relativeToBody: true
      );
      ,
      function()
      StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

      );
      );
      );
      Aug 12 at 6:38


      This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.






      marked as duplicate by Jyrki Lahtonen abstract-algebra
      Users with the  abstract-algebra badge can single-handedly close abstract-algebra questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

      $('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
      var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
      $msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

      $hover.hover(
      function()
      $hover.showInfoMessage('',
      messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
      transient: false,
      position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
      dismissable: false,
      relativeToBody: true
      );
      ,
      function()
      StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

      );
      );
      );
      Aug 12 at 6:38


      This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          5
          down vote



          accepted










          $D$ is a finite-dimensional vector space over $F$. If $ain D$, $ane0$
          consider the map $mu_a:Dto D$ defined by $mu_a(x)=ax$. Then $mu_a$
          is an $F$-linear map. Its kernel is zero, so its image is all of $D$, by the
          rank nullity formula. There is $bin D$ with $mu_a(b)=1$, that is $ab=1$.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • I think that the codomain of $mu_a$ is $D$, right?
            – Gödel
            Aug 12 at 13:40










          • Er, yes$$!
            – Lord Shark the Unknown
            Aug 12 at 13:59

















          up vote
          2
          down vote













          Take



          $0 ne alpha in D, tag 1$



          and let



          $m(x) in F[x] tag 2$



          be the minimal polynomial of $alpha$ over $F$; writing



          $m(x) = displaystyle sum_0^t m_i x^i, ; m_i in F, 0 le i le t, tag 3$



          I claim that



          $m_0 ne 0; tag 4$



          otherwise, we could write



          $m(x) = displaystyle sum_1^t m_i x^i = x sum_1^t m_i x^i - 1; tag 5$



          since



          $m(alpha) = 0, tag 6$



          we have



          $alpha displaystyle sum_1^t m_i alpha^i - 1 = 0; tag 7$



          since $alpha ne 0$, and $D$ is a integral domain, we conclude that



          $displaystyle sum_1^t m_i alpha^i - 1 = 0; tag 8$



          since the degree of the polynomial $sum_1^t m_i x^i - 1$ is $t - 1$, (8) contradicts the minimality of $m(x)$; thus we see that



          $m_0 ne 0, tag 9$



          which allows us to write



          $alpha displaystyle sum_1^t m_i alpha^i - 1 = -m_0 ne 0; tag10$



          this shows that



          $alpha^-1 = -m_0^-1displaystyle sum_1^t m_i alpha^i - 1 in D, tag11$



          hence $D$ is a field.






          share|cite|improve this answer





























            up vote
            1
            down vote













            Well every subring of a field is an integral domain anyway.






            share|cite|improve this answer



























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              5
              down vote



              accepted










              $D$ is a finite-dimensional vector space over $F$. If $ain D$, $ane0$
              consider the map $mu_a:Dto D$ defined by $mu_a(x)=ax$. Then $mu_a$
              is an $F$-linear map. Its kernel is zero, so its image is all of $D$, by the
              rank nullity formula. There is $bin D$ with $mu_a(b)=1$, that is $ab=1$.






              share|cite|improve this answer






















              • I think that the codomain of $mu_a$ is $D$, right?
                – Gödel
                Aug 12 at 13:40










              • Er, yes$$!
                – Lord Shark the Unknown
                Aug 12 at 13:59














              up vote
              5
              down vote



              accepted










              $D$ is a finite-dimensional vector space over $F$. If $ain D$, $ane0$
              consider the map $mu_a:Dto D$ defined by $mu_a(x)=ax$. Then $mu_a$
              is an $F$-linear map. Its kernel is zero, so its image is all of $D$, by the
              rank nullity formula. There is $bin D$ with $mu_a(b)=1$, that is $ab=1$.






              share|cite|improve this answer






















              • I think that the codomain of $mu_a$ is $D$, right?
                – Gödel
                Aug 12 at 13:40










              • Er, yes$$!
                – Lord Shark the Unknown
                Aug 12 at 13:59












              up vote
              5
              down vote



              accepted







              up vote
              5
              down vote



              accepted






              $D$ is a finite-dimensional vector space over $F$. If $ain D$, $ane0$
              consider the map $mu_a:Dto D$ defined by $mu_a(x)=ax$. Then $mu_a$
              is an $F$-linear map. Its kernel is zero, so its image is all of $D$, by the
              rank nullity formula. There is $bin D$ with $mu_a(b)=1$, that is $ab=1$.






              share|cite|improve this answer














              $D$ is a finite-dimensional vector space over $F$. If $ain D$, $ane0$
              consider the map $mu_a:Dto D$ defined by $mu_a(x)=ax$. Then $mu_a$
              is an $F$-linear map. Its kernel is zero, so its image is all of $D$, by the
              rank nullity formula. There is $bin D$ with $mu_a(b)=1$, that is $ab=1$.







              share|cite|improve this answer














              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer








              edited Aug 12 at 13:59

























              answered Aug 12 at 6:32









              Lord Shark the Unknown

              86.7k952112




              86.7k952112











              • I think that the codomain of $mu_a$ is $D$, right?
                – Gödel
                Aug 12 at 13:40










              • Er, yes$$!
                – Lord Shark the Unknown
                Aug 12 at 13:59
















              • I think that the codomain of $mu_a$ is $D$, right?
                – Gödel
                Aug 12 at 13:40










              • Er, yes$$!
                – Lord Shark the Unknown
                Aug 12 at 13:59















              I think that the codomain of $mu_a$ is $D$, right?
              – Gödel
              Aug 12 at 13:40




              I think that the codomain of $mu_a$ is $D$, right?
              – Gödel
              Aug 12 at 13:40












              Er, yes$$!
              – Lord Shark the Unknown
              Aug 12 at 13:59




              Er, yes$$!
              – Lord Shark the Unknown
              Aug 12 at 13:59










              up vote
              2
              down vote













              Take



              $0 ne alpha in D, tag 1$



              and let



              $m(x) in F[x] tag 2$



              be the minimal polynomial of $alpha$ over $F$; writing



              $m(x) = displaystyle sum_0^t m_i x^i, ; m_i in F, 0 le i le t, tag 3$



              I claim that



              $m_0 ne 0; tag 4$



              otherwise, we could write



              $m(x) = displaystyle sum_1^t m_i x^i = x sum_1^t m_i x^i - 1; tag 5$



              since



              $m(alpha) = 0, tag 6$



              we have



              $alpha displaystyle sum_1^t m_i alpha^i - 1 = 0; tag 7$



              since $alpha ne 0$, and $D$ is a integral domain, we conclude that



              $displaystyle sum_1^t m_i alpha^i - 1 = 0; tag 8$



              since the degree of the polynomial $sum_1^t m_i x^i - 1$ is $t - 1$, (8) contradicts the minimality of $m(x)$; thus we see that



              $m_0 ne 0, tag 9$



              which allows us to write



              $alpha displaystyle sum_1^t m_i alpha^i - 1 = -m_0 ne 0; tag10$



              this shows that



              $alpha^-1 = -m_0^-1displaystyle sum_1^t m_i alpha^i - 1 in D, tag11$



              hence $D$ is a field.






              share|cite|improve this answer


























                up vote
                2
                down vote













                Take



                $0 ne alpha in D, tag 1$



                and let



                $m(x) in F[x] tag 2$



                be the minimal polynomial of $alpha$ over $F$; writing



                $m(x) = displaystyle sum_0^t m_i x^i, ; m_i in F, 0 le i le t, tag 3$



                I claim that



                $m_0 ne 0; tag 4$



                otherwise, we could write



                $m(x) = displaystyle sum_1^t m_i x^i = x sum_1^t m_i x^i - 1; tag 5$



                since



                $m(alpha) = 0, tag 6$



                we have



                $alpha displaystyle sum_1^t m_i alpha^i - 1 = 0; tag 7$



                since $alpha ne 0$, and $D$ is a integral domain, we conclude that



                $displaystyle sum_1^t m_i alpha^i - 1 = 0; tag 8$



                since the degree of the polynomial $sum_1^t m_i x^i - 1$ is $t - 1$, (8) contradicts the minimality of $m(x)$; thus we see that



                $m_0 ne 0, tag 9$



                which allows us to write



                $alpha displaystyle sum_1^t m_i alpha^i - 1 = -m_0 ne 0; tag10$



                this shows that



                $alpha^-1 = -m_0^-1displaystyle sum_1^t m_i alpha^i - 1 in D, tag11$



                hence $D$ is a field.






                share|cite|improve this answer
























                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote









                  Take



                  $0 ne alpha in D, tag 1$



                  and let



                  $m(x) in F[x] tag 2$



                  be the minimal polynomial of $alpha$ over $F$; writing



                  $m(x) = displaystyle sum_0^t m_i x^i, ; m_i in F, 0 le i le t, tag 3$



                  I claim that



                  $m_0 ne 0; tag 4$



                  otherwise, we could write



                  $m(x) = displaystyle sum_1^t m_i x^i = x sum_1^t m_i x^i - 1; tag 5$



                  since



                  $m(alpha) = 0, tag 6$



                  we have



                  $alpha displaystyle sum_1^t m_i alpha^i - 1 = 0; tag 7$



                  since $alpha ne 0$, and $D$ is a integral domain, we conclude that



                  $displaystyle sum_1^t m_i alpha^i - 1 = 0; tag 8$



                  since the degree of the polynomial $sum_1^t m_i x^i - 1$ is $t - 1$, (8) contradicts the minimality of $m(x)$; thus we see that



                  $m_0 ne 0, tag 9$



                  which allows us to write



                  $alpha displaystyle sum_1^t m_i alpha^i - 1 = -m_0 ne 0; tag10$



                  this shows that



                  $alpha^-1 = -m_0^-1displaystyle sum_1^t m_i alpha^i - 1 in D, tag11$



                  hence $D$ is a field.






                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  Take



                  $0 ne alpha in D, tag 1$



                  and let



                  $m(x) in F[x] tag 2$



                  be the minimal polynomial of $alpha$ over $F$; writing



                  $m(x) = displaystyle sum_0^t m_i x^i, ; m_i in F, 0 le i le t, tag 3$



                  I claim that



                  $m_0 ne 0; tag 4$



                  otherwise, we could write



                  $m(x) = displaystyle sum_1^t m_i x^i = x sum_1^t m_i x^i - 1; tag 5$



                  since



                  $m(alpha) = 0, tag 6$



                  we have



                  $alpha displaystyle sum_1^t m_i alpha^i - 1 = 0; tag 7$



                  since $alpha ne 0$, and $D$ is a integral domain, we conclude that



                  $displaystyle sum_1^t m_i alpha^i - 1 = 0; tag 8$



                  since the degree of the polynomial $sum_1^t m_i x^i - 1$ is $t - 1$, (8) contradicts the minimality of $m(x)$; thus we see that



                  $m_0 ne 0, tag 9$



                  which allows us to write



                  $alpha displaystyle sum_1^t m_i alpha^i - 1 = -m_0 ne 0; tag10$



                  this shows that



                  $alpha^-1 = -m_0^-1displaystyle sum_1^t m_i alpha^i - 1 in D, tag11$



                  hence $D$ is a field.







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Aug 12 at 6:12

























                  answered Aug 12 at 6:00









                  Robert Lewis

                  37.3k22356




                  37.3k22356




















                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote













                      Well every subring of a field is an integral domain anyway.






                      share|cite|improve this answer
























                        up vote
                        1
                        down vote













                        Well every subring of a field is an integral domain anyway.






                        share|cite|improve this answer






















                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote









                          Well every subring of a field is an integral domain anyway.






                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          Well every subring of a field is an integral domain anyway.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Aug 12 at 5:18









                          Kenny Lau

                          18.9k2157




                          18.9k2157












                              這個網誌中的熱門文章

                              How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

                              Carbon dioxide

                              Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?