If $Fsubset D subset E$ then $D$ must be a field [duplicate]
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
This question already has an answer here:
Proof that an integral domain that is a finite-dimensional $F$-vector space is in fact a field
3 answers
Let $F$ a field and $E$ a finite extension of $F$. I need to show that, if $D$ is a integral domain such that $Fsubset Dsubset E$ then, D is a field.
My attempt: As $E$ is a finite extension, it is a algebraic extension. Let $alphain D$, it is sufficient to show that each element of $D$ has a inverse. So, take $alphain D$ so $alpha$ is algebraic over $F$. Suppose that $deg(alpha,F)=n$, then every element of $F(alpha)$ can be written as $a_0+a_1alpha+cdots+a_n-1alpha^n-1$ where $a_iin F$. Therefore, $F(alpha)subset D$ and as $F(alpha)$ is a field and it contains the inverse of $alpha$.
I have troubles with my proof because a don't see where the fact that $D$ is integral domain is important.
abstract-algebra field-theory extension-field
marked as duplicate by Jyrki Lahtonen
StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
);
);
);
Aug 12 at 6:38
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
This question already has an answer here:
Proof that an integral domain that is a finite-dimensional $F$-vector space is in fact a field
3 answers
Let $F$ a field and $E$ a finite extension of $F$. I need to show that, if $D$ is a integral domain such that $Fsubset Dsubset E$ then, D is a field.
My attempt: As $E$ is a finite extension, it is a algebraic extension. Let $alphain D$, it is sufficient to show that each element of $D$ has a inverse. So, take $alphain D$ so $alpha$ is algebraic over $F$. Suppose that $deg(alpha,F)=n$, then every element of $F(alpha)$ can be written as $a_0+a_1alpha+cdots+a_n-1alpha^n-1$ where $a_iin F$. Therefore, $F(alpha)subset D$ and as $F(alpha)$ is a field and it contains the inverse of $alpha$.
I have troubles with my proof because a don't see where the fact that $D$ is integral domain is important.
abstract-algebra field-theory extension-field
marked as duplicate by Jyrki Lahtonen
StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
);
);
);
Aug 12 at 6:38
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
This question already has an answer here:
Proof that an integral domain that is a finite-dimensional $F$-vector space is in fact a field
3 answers
Let $F$ a field and $E$ a finite extension of $F$. I need to show that, if $D$ is a integral domain such that $Fsubset Dsubset E$ then, D is a field.
My attempt: As $E$ is a finite extension, it is a algebraic extension. Let $alphain D$, it is sufficient to show that each element of $D$ has a inverse. So, take $alphain D$ so $alpha$ is algebraic over $F$. Suppose that $deg(alpha,F)=n$, then every element of $F(alpha)$ can be written as $a_0+a_1alpha+cdots+a_n-1alpha^n-1$ where $a_iin F$. Therefore, $F(alpha)subset D$ and as $F(alpha)$ is a field and it contains the inverse of $alpha$.
I have troubles with my proof because a don't see where the fact that $D$ is integral domain is important.
abstract-algebra field-theory extension-field
This question already has an answer here:
Proof that an integral domain that is a finite-dimensional $F$-vector space is in fact a field
3 answers
Let $F$ a field and $E$ a finite extension of $F$. I need to show that, if $D$ is a integral domain such that $Fsubset Dsubset E$ then, D is a field.
My attempt: As $E$ is a finite extension, it is a algebraic extension. Let $alphain D$, it is sufficient to show that each element of $D$ has a inverse. So, take $alphain D$ so $alpha$ is algebraic over $F$. Suppose that $deg(alpha,F)=n$, then every element of $F(alpha)$ can be written as $a_0+a_1alpha+cdots+a_n-1alpha^n-1$ where $a_iin F$. Therefore, $F(alpha)subset D$ and as $F(alpha)$ is a field and it contains the inverse of $alpha$.
I have troubles with my proof because a don't see where the fact that $D$ is integral domain is important.
This question already has an answer here:
Proof that an integral domain that is a finite-dimensional $F$-vector space is in fact a field
3 answers
abstract-algebra field-theory extension-field
asked Aug 12 at 5:08
Gödel
1,157319
1,157319
marked as duplicate by Jyrki Lahtonen
StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
);
);
);
Aug 12 at 6:38
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
marked as duplicate by Jyrki Lahtonen
StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
);
);
);
Aug 12 at 6:38
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
$D$ is a finite-dimensional vector space over $F$. If $ain D$, $ane0$
consider the map $mu_a:Dto D$ defined by $mu_a(x)=ax$. Then $mu_a$
is an $F$-linear map. Its kernel is zero, so its image is all of $D$, by the
rank nullity formula. There is $bin D$ with $mu_a(b)=1$, that is $ab=1$.
I think that the codomain of $mu_a$ is $D$, right?
â Gödel
Aug 12 at 13:40
Er, yes$$!
â Lord Shark the Unknown
Aug 12 at 13:59
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
Take
$0 ne alpha in D, tag 1$
and let
$m(x) in F[x] tag 2$
be the minimal polynomial of $alpha$ over $F$; writing
$m(x) = displaystyle sum_0^t m_i x^i, ; m_i in F, 0 le i le t, tag 3$
I claim that
$m_0 ne 0; tag 4$
otherwise, we could write
$m(x) = displaystyle sum_1^t m_i x^i = x sum_1^t m_i x^i - 1; tag 5$
since
$m(alpha) = 0, tag 6$
we have
$alpha displaystyle sum_1^t m_i alpha^i - 1 = 0; tag 7$
since $alpha ne 0$, and $D$ is a integral domain, we conclude that
$displaystyle sum_1^t m_i alpha^i - 1 = 0; tag 8$
since the degree of the polynomial $sum_1^t m_i x^i - 1$ is $t - 1$, (8) contradicts the minimality of $m(x)$; thus we see that
$m_0 ne 0, tag 9$
which allows us to write
$alpha displaystyle sum_1^t m_i alpha^i - 1 = -m_0 ne 0; tag10$
this shows that
$alpha^-1 = -m_0^-1displaystyle sum_1^t m_i alpha^i - 1 in D, tag11$
hence $D$ is a field.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Well every subring of a field is an integral domain anyway.
add a comment |Â
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
$D$ is a finite-dimensional vector space over $F$. If $ain D$, $ane0$
consider the map $mu_a:Dto D$ defined by $mu_a(x)=ax$. Then $mu_a$
is an $F$-linear map. Its kernel is zero, so its image is all of $D$, by the
rank nullity formula. There is $bin D$ with $mu_a(b)=1$, that is $ab=1$.
I think that the codomain of $mu_a$ is $D$, right?
â Gödel
Aug 12 at 13:40
Er, yes$$!
â Lord Shark the Unknown
Aug 12 at 13:59
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
$D$ is a finite-dimensional vector space over $F$. If $ain D$, $ane0$
consider the map $mu_a:Dto D$ defined by $mu_a(x)=ax$. Then $mu_a$
is an $F$-linear map. Its kernel is zero, so its image is all of $D$, by the
rank nullity formula. There is $bin D$ with $mu_a(b)=1$, that is $ab=1$.
I think that the codomain of $mu_a$ is $D$, right?
â Gödel
Aug 12 at 13:40
Er, yes$$!
â Lord Shark the Unknown
Aug 12 at 13:59
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
$D$ is a finite-dimensional vector space over $F$. If $ain D$, $ane0$
consider the map $mu_a:Dto D$ defined by $mu_a(x)=ax$. Then $mu_a$
is an $F$-linear map. Its kernel is zero, so its image is all of $D$, by the
rank nullity formula. There is $bin D$ with $mu_a(b)=1$, that is $ab=1$.
$D$ is a finite-dimensional vector space over $F$. If $ain D$, $ane0$
consider the map $mu_a:Dto D$ defined by $mu_a(x)=ax$. Then $mu_a$
is an $F$-linear map. Its kernel is zero, so its image is all of $D$, by the
rank nullity formula. There is $bin D$ with $mu_a(b)=1$, that is $ab=1$.
edited Aug 12 at 13:59
answered Aug 12 at 6:32
Lord Shark the Unknown
86.7k952112
86.7k952112
I think that the codomain of $mu_a$ is $D$, right?
â Gödel
Aug 12 at 13:40
Er, yes$$!
â Lord Shark the Unknown
Aug 12 at 13:59
add a comment |Â
I think that the codomain of $mu_a$ is $D$, right?
â Gödel
Aug 12 at 13:40
Er, yes$$!
â Lord Shark the Unknown
Aug 12 at 13:59
I think that the codomain of $mu_a$ is $D$, right?
â Gödel
Aug 12 at 13:40
I think that the codomain of $mu_a$ is $D$, right?
â Gödel
Aug 12 at 13:40
Er, yes$$!
â Lord Shark the Unknown
Aug 12 at 13:59
Er, yes$$!
â Lord Shark the Unknown
Aug 12 at 13:59
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
Take
$0 ne alpha in D, tag 1$
and let
$m(x) in F[x] tag 2$
be the minimal polynomial of $alpha$ over $F$; writing
$m(x) = displaystyle sum_0^t m_i x^i, ; m_i in F, 0 le i le t, tag 3$
I claim that
$m_0 ne 0; tag 4$
otherwise, we could write
$m(x) = displaystyle sum_1^t m_i x^i = x sum_1^t m_i x^i - 1; tag 5$
since
$m(alpha) = 0, tag 6$
we have
$alpha displaystyle sum_1^t m_i alpha^i - 1 = 0; tag 7$
since $alpha ne 0$, and $D$ is a integral domain, we conclude that
$displaystyle sum_1^t m_i alpha^i - 1 = 0; tag 8$
since the degree of the polynomial $sum_1^t m_i x^i - 1$ is $t - 1$, (8) contradicts the minimality of $m(x)$; thus we see that
$m_0 ne 0, tag 9$
which allows us to write
$alpha displaystyle sum_1^t m_i alpha^i - 1 = -m_0 ne 0; tag10$
this shows that
$alpha^-1 = -m_0^-1displaystyle sum_1^t m_i alpha^i - 1 in D, tag11$
hence $D$ is a field.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
Take
$0 ne alpha in D, tag 1$
and let
$m(x) in F[x] tag 2$
be the minimal polynomial of $alpha$ over $F$; writing
$m(x) = displaystyle sum_0^t m_i x^i, ; m_i in F, 0 le i le t, tag 3$
I claim that
$m_0 ne 0; tag 4$
otherwise, we could write
$m(x) = displaystyle sum_1^t m_i x^i = x sum_1^t m_i x^i - 1; tag 5$
since
$m(alpha) = 0, tag 6$
we have
$alpha displaystyle sum_1^t m_i alpha^i - 1 = 0; tag 7$
since $alpha ne 0$, and $D$ is a integral domain, we conclude that
$displaystyle sum_1^t m_i alpha^i - 1 = 0; tag 8$
since the degree of the polynomial $sum_1^t m_i x^i - 1$ is $t - 1$, (8) contradicts the minimality of $m(x)$; thus we see that
$m_0 ne 0, tag 9$
which allows us to write
$alpha displaystyle sum_1^t m_i alpha^i - 1 = -m_0 ne 0; tag10$
this shows that
$alpha^-1 = -m_0^-1displaystyle sum_1^t m_i alpha^i - 1 in D, tag11$
hence $D$ is a field.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
Take
$0 ne alpha in D, tag 1$
and let
$m(x) in F[x] tag 2$
be the minimal polynomial of $alpha$ over $F$; writing
$m(x) = displaystyle sum_0^t m_i x^i, ; m_i in F, 0 le i le t, tag 3$
I claim that
$m_0 ne 0; tag 4$
otherwise, we could write
$m(x) = displaystyle sum_1^t m_i x^i = x sum_1^t m_i x^i - 1; tag 5$
since
$m(alpha) = 0, tag 6$
we have
$alpha displaystyle sum_1^t m_i alpha^i - 1 = 0; tag 7$
since $alpha ne 0$, and $D$ is a integral domain, we conclude that
$displaystyle sum_1^t m_i alpha^i - 1 = 0; tag 8$
since the degree of the polynomial $sum_1^t m_i x^i - 1$ is $t - 1$, (8) contradicts the minimality of $m(x)$; thus we see that
$m_0 ne 0, tag 9$
which allows us to write
$alpha displaystyle sum_1^t m_i alpha^i - 1 = -m_0 ne 0; tag10$
this shows that
$alpha^-1 = -m_0^-1displaystyle sum_1^t m_i alpha^i - 1 in D, tag11$
hence $D$ is a field.
Take
$0 ne alpha in D, tag 1$
and let
$m(x) in F[x] tag 2$
be the minimal polynomial of $alpha$ over $F$; writing
$m(x) = displaystyle sum_0^t m_i x^i, ; m_i in F, 0 le i le t, tag 3$
I claim that
$m_0 ne 0; tag 4$
otherwise, we could write
$m(x) = displaystyle sum_1^t m_i x^i = x sum_1^t m_i x^i - 1; tag 5$
since
$m(alpha) = 0, tag 6$
we have
$alpha displaystyle sum_1^t m_i alpha^i - 1 = 0; tag 7$
since $alpha ne 0$, and $D$ is a integral domain, we conclude that
$displaystyle sum_1^t m_i alpha^i - 1 = 0; tag 8$
since the degree of the polynomial $sum_1^t m_i x^i - 1$ is $t - 1$, (8) contradicts the minimality of $m(x)$; thus we see that
$m_0 ne 0, tag 9$
which allows us to write
$alpha displaystyle sum_1^t m_i alpha^i - 1 = -m_0 ne 0; tag10$
this shows that
$alpha^-1 = -m_0^-1displaystyle sum_1^t m_i alpha^i - 1 in D, tag11$
hence $D$ is a field.
edited Aug 12 at 6:12
answered Aug 12 at 6:00
Robert Lewis
37.3k22356
37.3k22356
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Well every subring of a field is an integral domain anyway.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Well every subring of a field is an integral domain anyway.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Well every subring of a field is an integral domain anyway.
Well every subring of a field is an integral domain anyway.
answered Aug 12 at 5:18
Kenny Lau
18.9k2157
18.9k2157
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â