Evaluate $lim_xrightarrow0frace^x-e^-xe^x-1$
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I want to evaluate the following limit:
$$lim_xrightarrow0frace^x-e^-xe^x-1$$
For $xrightarrow0$, the denominator is asymptotic to
$$e^x-1sim x$$
Here's how I simplify the numerator:
$$e^x-e^-xsim 1-e^-x=-(e^-x-1)sim-(-x)=x$$
Finally we have
$$f(x)simfracxx=1$$
My textbook does it another way and the solution is 2. I wonder what I'm doing wrong. Perhaps it's the fact that I have replaced $e^x$ with $1$ but that seemed to make sense to me because $e^xrightarrow1$ for $xrightarrow0$. Any hints?
limits
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I want to evaluate the following limit:
$$lim_xrightarrow0frace^x-e^-xe^x-1$$
For $xrightarrow0$, the denominator is asymptotic to
$$e^x-1sim x$$
Here's how I simplify the numerator:
$$e^x-e^-xsim 1-e^-x=-(e^-x-1)sim-(-x)=x$$
Finally we have
$$f(x)simfracxx=1$$
My textbook does it another way and the solution is 2. I wonder what I'm doing wrong. Perhaps it's the fact that I have replaced $e^x$ with $1$ but that seemed to make sense to me because $e^xrightarrow1$ for $xrightarrow0$. Any hints?
limits
Try L'Hospital's Rule !!
â Anik Bhowmick
Aug 12 at 9:19
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I want to evaluate the following limit:
$$lim_xrightarrow0frace^x-e^-xe^x-1$$
For $xrightarrow0$, the denominator is asymptotic to
$$e^x-1sim x$$
Here's how I simplify the numerator:
$$e^x-e^-xsim 1-e^-x=-(e^-x-1)sim-(-x)=x$$
Finally we have
$$f(x)simfracxx=1$$
My textbook does it another way and the solution is 2. I wonder what I'm doing wrong. Perhaps it's the fact that I have replaced $e^x$ with $1$ but that seemed to make sense to me because $e^xrightarrow1$ for $xrightarrow0$. Any hints?
limits
I want to evaluate the following limit:
$$lim_xrightarrow0frace^x-e^-xe^x-1$$
For $xrightarrow0$, the denominator is asymptotic to
$$e^x-1sim x$$
Here's how I simplify the numerator:
$$e^x-e^-xsim 1-e^-x=-(e^-x-1)sim-(-x)=x$$
Finally we have
$$f(x)simfracxx=1$$
My textbook does it another way and the solution is 2. I wonder what I'm doing wrong. Perhaps it's the fact that I have replaced $e^x$ with $1$ but that seemed to make sense to me because $e^xrightarrow1$ for $xrightarrow0$. Any hints?
limits
asked Aug 12 at 8:25
Cesare
50529
50529
Try L'Hospital's Rule !!
â Anik Bhowmick
Aug 12 at 9:19
add a comment |Â
Try L'Hospital's Rule !!
â Anik Bhowmick
Aug 12 at 9:19
Try L'Hospital's Rule !!
â Anik Bhowmick
Aug 12 at 9:19
Try L'Hospital's Rule !!
â Anik Bhowmick
Aug 12 at 9:19
add a comment |Â
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
How do you justify $e^x-e^-xsim 1-e^-x$?
It is true that $e^x = 1 + o(1)$, but if that is your justification then $sim$ must mean "up to terms of degree $1$ or more", so when you end up with the numerator being $sim x$, then this is the same as $sim 0$ or $sim 2x$ as far as this meaning of $sim$ is concerned. You've thrown away the information you need to conclude anything.
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
What you did is wrong because both $e^x$ and $e^-x$ behave as $1$ near $0$. You can't replace one if them by $1$, while the other one remains as it is.
Note that$$lim_xto0frace^x-e^-xe^x-1=lim_xto0frace^x+e^-xe^x=2.$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
The solution goes as follows:
$$lim_xto 0frace^x-e^-xe^x-1=lim_xto 0fracfrace^2x-1e^xe^x-1=lim_xto 0fracfrac(e^x-1)(e^x+1)e^xe^x-1=lim_xto 0frace^x+1e^x=2$$
The OP states: "My textbook does it another way and the solution is 2". They already have a solution that leads to the correct answer, and don't need to be shown yet another one. The question was went wrong in their attempt, and this post doesn't answer that.
â Henning Makholm
Aug 12 at 10:58
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
$displaystylelim_x to 0dfrace^x-e^-xe^x-1$
now,
$e^x-e^-x=left(1+x+dfracx^22!+dfracx^33!+cdots right)-left(1-x+dfracx^22!-dfracx^33!+cdots right)=2left(x+dfracx^33!+dfracx^55!+cdots right) approx2x$ as $ xto 0$
and $e^x-1=x+dfracx^22!+dfracx^33!+cdots approx x $, as $ xto 0$
$therefore displaystylelim_x to 0dfrace^x-e^-xe^x-1=displaystylelim_x to 0dfrac2xx=2.$
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
You cannot just substitute the limits, as that leads to $0/0$. L'Hopital's rule is designed for exactly this type of problems, see:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%27Hôpital%27s_rule
And indeed, the answer is $2/1=2$, once you apply that rule.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
Using equivalents as you did (which the simplest method here), observe the numerator is
$$mathrm e^x-mathrm e^-x=2sinh xsim_0 2x,$$
whence
$$fracmathrm e^x-mathrm e^-xmathrm e^x-1sim_0frac2xx=2.$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
Making $y = e^x$ we have
$$lim_xrightarrow0frace^x-e^-xe^x-1equiv lim_yto 1fracy-frac 1yy-1 = lim_yto 1fracy^2-1y(y-1) = lim_yto 1fracy+1y= 2 $$
add a comment |Â
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
How do you justify $e^x-e^-xsim 1-e^-x$?
It is true that $e^x = 1 + o(1)$, but if that is your justification then $sim$ must mean "up to terms of degree $1$ or more", so when you end up with the numerator being $sim x$, then this is the same as $sim 0$ or $sim 2x$ as far as this meaning of $sim$ is concerned. You've thrown away the information you need to conclude anything.
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
How do you justify $e^x-e^-xsim 1-e^-x$?
It is true that $e^x = 1 + o(1)$, but if that is your justification then $sim$ must mean "up to terms of degree $1$ or more", so when you end up with the numerator being $sim x$, then this is the same as $sim 0$ or $sim 2x$ as far as this meaning of $sim$ is concerned. You've thrown away the information you need to conclude anything.
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
How do you justify $e^x-e^-xsim 1-e^-x$?
It is true that $e^x = 1 + o(1)$, but if that is your justification then $sim$ must mean "up to terms of degree $1$ or more", so when you end up with the numerator being $sim x$, then this is the same as $sim 0$ or $sim 2x$ as far as this meaning of $sim$ is concerned. You've thrown away the information you need to conclude anything.
How do you justify $e^x-e^-xsim 1-e^-x$?
It is true that $e^x = 1 + o(1)$, but if that is your justification then $sim$ must mean "up to terms of degree $1$ or more", so when you end up with the numerator being $sim x$, then this is the same as $sim 0$ or $sim 2x$ as far as this meaning of $sim$ is concerned. You've thrown away the information you need to conclude anything.
answered Aug 12 at 8:32
Henning Makholm
227k16293524
227k16293524
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
What you did is wrong because both $e^x$ and $e^-x$ behave as $1$ near $0$. You can't replace one if them by $1$, while the other one remains as it is.
Note that$$lim_xto0frace^x-e^-xe^x-1=lim_xto0frace^x+e^-xe^x=2.$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
What you did is wrong because both $e^x$ and $e^-x$ behave as $1$ near $0$. You can't replace one if them by $1$, while the other one remains as it is.
Note that$$lim_xto0frace^x-e^-xe^x-1=lim_xto0frace^x+e^-xe^x=2.$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
up vote
6
down vote
What you did is wrong because both $e^x$ and $e^-x$ behave as $1$ near $0$. You can't replace one if them by $1$, while the other one remains as it is.
Note that$$lim_xto0frace^x-e^-xe^x-1=lim_xto0frace^x+e^-xe^x=2.$$
What you did is wrong because both $e^x$ and $e^-x$ behave as $1$ near $0$. You can't replace one if them by $1$, while the other one remains as it is.
Note that$$lim_xto0frace^x-e^-xe^x-1=lim_xto0frace^x+e^-xe^x=2.$$
answered Aug 12 at 8:29
José Carlos Santos
116k1699178
116k1699178
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
The solution goes as follows:
$$lim_xto 0frace^x-e^-xe^x-1=lim_xto 0fracfrace^2x-1e^xe^x-1=lim_xto 0fracfrac(e^x-1)(e^x+1)e^xe^x-1=lim_xto 0frace^x+1e^x=2$$
The OP states: "My textbook does it another way and the solution is 2". They already have a solution that leads to the correct answer, and don't need to be shown yet another one. The question was went wrong in their attempt, and this post doesn't answer that.
â Henning Makholm
Aug 12 at 10:58
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
The solution goes as follows:
$$lim_xto 0frace^x-e^-xe^x-1=lim_xto 0fracfrace^2x-1e^xe^x-1=lim_xto 0fracfrac(e^x-1)(e^x+1)e^xe^x-1=lim_xto 0frace^x+1e^x=2$$
The OP states: "My textbook does it another way and the solution is 2". They already have a solution that leads to the correct answer, and don't need to be shown yet another one. The question was went wrong in their attempt, and this post doesn't answer that.
â Henning Makholm
Aug 12 at 10:58
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
The solution goes as follows:
$$lim_xto 0frace^x-e^-xe^x-1=lim_xto 0fracfrace^2x-1e^xe^x-1=lim_xto 0fracfrac(e^x-1)(e^x+1)e^xe^x-1=lim_xto 0frace^x+1e^x=2$$
The solution goes as follows:
$$lim_xto 0frace^x-e^-xe^x-1=lim_xto 0fracfrace^2x-1e^xe^x-1=lim_xto 0fracfrac(e^x-1)(e^x+1)e^xe^x-1=lim_xto 0frace^x+1e^x=2$$
answered Aug 12 at 8:37
Anastassis Kapetanakis
46935
46935
The OP states: "My textbook does it another way and the solution is 2". They already have a solution that leads to the correct answer, and don't need to be shown yet another one. The question was went wrong in their attempt, and this post doesn't answer that.
â Henning Makholm
Aug 12 at 10:58
add a comment |Â
The OP states: "My textbook does it another way and the solution is 2". They already have a solution that leads to the correct answer, and don't need to be shown yet another one. The question was went wrong in their attempt, and this post doesn't answer that.
â Henning Makholm
Aug 12 at 10:58
The OP states: "My textbook does it another way and the solution is 2". They already have a solution that leads to the correct answer, and don't need to be shown yet another one. The question was went wrong in their attempt, and this post doesn't answer that.
â Henning Makholm
Aug 12 at 10:58
The OP states: "My textbook does it another way and the solution is 2". They already have a solution that leads to the correct answer, and don't need to be shown yet another one. The question was went wrong in their attempt, and this post doesn't answer that.
â Henning Makholm
Aug 12 at 10:58
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
$displaystylelim_x to 0dfrace^x-e^-xe^x-1$
now,
$e^x-e^-x=left(1+x+dfracx^22!+dfracx^33!+cdots right)-left(1-x+dfracx^22!-dfracx^33!+cdots right)=2left(x+dfracx^33!+dfracx^55!+cdots right) approx2x$ as $ xto 0$
and $e^x-1=x+dfracx^22!+dfracx^33!+cdots approx x $, as $ xto 0$
$therefore displaystylelim_x to 0dfrace^x-e^-xe^x-1=displaystylelim_x to 0dfrac2xx=2.$
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
$displaystylelim_x to 0dfrace^x-e^-xe^x-1$
now,
$e^x-e^-x=left(1+x+dfracx^22!+dfracx^33!+cdots right)-left(1-x+dfracx^22!-dfracx^33!+cdots right)=2left(x+dfracx^33!+dfracx^55!+cdots right) approx2x$ as $ xto 0$
and $e^x-1=x+dfracx^22!+dfracx^33!+cdots approx x $, as $ xto 0$
$therefore displaystylelim_x to 0dfrace^x-e^-xe^x-1=displaystylelim_x to 0dfrac2xx=2.$
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
$displaystylelim_x to 0dfrace^x-e^-xe^x-1$
now,
$e^x-e^-x=left(1+x+dfracx^22!+dfracx^33!+cdots right)-left(1-x+dfracx^22!-dfracx^33!+cdots right)=2left(x+dfracx^33!+dfracx^55!+cdots right) approx2x$ as $ xto 0$
and $e^x-1=x+dfracx^22!+dfracx^33!+cdots approx x $, as $ xto 0$
$therefore displaystylelim_x to 0dfrace^x-e^-xe^x-1=displaystylelim_x to 0dfrac2xx=2.$
$displaystylelim_x to 0dfrace^x-e^-xe^x-1$
now,
$e^x-e^-x=left(1+x+dfracx^22!+dfracx^33!+cdots right)-left(1-x+dfracx^22!-dfracx^33!+cdots right)=2left(x+dfracx^33!+dfracx^55!+cdots right) approx2x$ as $ xto 0$
and $e^x-1=x+dfracx^22!+dfracx^33!+cdots approx x $, as $ xto 0$
$therefore displaystylelim_x to 0dfrace^x-e^-xe^x-1=displaystylelim_x to 0dfrac2xx=2.$
answered Aug 12 at 10:33
Arjun Banerjee
915
915
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
You cannot just substitute the limits, as that leads to $0/0$. L'Hopital's rule is designed for exactly this type of problems, see:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%27Hôpital%27s_rule
And indeed, the answer is $2/1=2$, once you apply that rule.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
You cannot just substitute the limits, as that leads to $0/0$. L'Hopital's rule is designed for exactly this type of problems, see:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%27Hôpital%27s_rule
And indeed, the answer is $2/1=2$, once you apply that rule.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
You cannot just substitute the limits, as that leads to $0/0$. L'Hopital's rule is designed for exactly this type of problems, see:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%27Hôpital%27s_rule
And indeed, the answer is $2/1=2$, once you apply that rule.
You cannot just substitute the limits, as that leads to $0/0$. L'Hopital's rule is designed for exactly this type of problems, see:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%27Hôpital%27s_rule
And indeed, the answer is $2/1=2$, once you apply that rule.
answered Aug 12 at 8:29
A. Pongrácz
3,677624
3,677624
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
Using equivalents as you did (which the simplest method here), observe the numerator is
$$mathrm e^x-mathrm e^-x=2sinh xsim_0 2x,$$
whence
$$fracmathrm e^x-mathrm e^-xmathrm e^x-1sim_0frac2xx=2.$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
Using equivalents as you did (which the simplest method here), observe the numerator is
$$mathrm e^x-mathrm e^-x=2sinh xsim_0 2x,$$
whence
$$fracmathrm e^x-mathrm e^-xmathrm e^x-1sim_0frac2xx=2.$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
Using equivalents as you did (which the simplest method here), observe the numerator is
$$mathrm e^x-mathrm e^-x=2sinh xsim_0 2x,$$
whence
$$fracmathrm e^x-mathrm e^-xmathrm e^x-1sim_0frac2xx=2.$$
Using equivalents as you did (which the simplest method here), observe the numerator is
$$mathrm e^x-mathrm e^-x=2sinh xsim_0 2x,$$
whence
$$fracmathrm e^x-mathrm e^-xmathrm e^x-1sim_0frac2xx=2.$$
answered Aug 12 at 9:22
Bernard
111k635103
111k635103
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
Making $y = e^x$ we have
$$lim_xrightarrow0frace^x-e^-xe^x-1equiv lim_yto 1fracy-frac 1yy-1 = lim_yto 1fracy^2-1y(y-1) = lim_yto 1fracy+1y= 2 $$
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
Making $y = e^x$ we have
$$lim_xrightarrow0frace^x-e^-xe^x-1equiv lim_yto 1fracy-frac 1yy-1 = lim_yto 1fracy^2-1y(y-1) = lim_yto 1fracy+1y= 2 $$
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
Making $y = e^x$ we have
$$lim_xrightarrow0frace^x-e^-xe^x-1equiv lim_yto 1fracy-frac 1yy-1 = lim_yto 1fracy^2-1y(y-1) = lim_yto 1fracy+1y= 2 $$
Making $y = e^x$ we have
$$lim_xrightarrow0frace^x-e^-xe^x-1equiv lim_yto 1fracy-frac 1yy-1 = lim_yto 1fracy^2-1y(y-1) = lim_yto 1fracy+1y= 2 $$
answered Aug 12 at 10:00
Cesareo
5,8902412
5,8902412
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2880102%2fevaluate-lim-x-rightarrow0-fracex-e-xex-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Try L'Hospital's Rule !!
â Anik Bhowmick
Aug 12 at 9:19