Sums of powers below a prime

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
8
down vote

favorite
2












Given a prime $p$ and a natural number $k$, such that $k$ is not divisible by $p - 1$, prove that $sum_i = 1^p - 1i^k equiv 0 pmod p$.



I split the proof into two cases: one where $k$ is odd and another where it is even.



The case where $k$ is odd can be proven as follows:



$$sum_i = 1^p - 1i^k equiv sum_i = 1^fracp - 12i^k + sum_i = 1^fracp - 12(-i)^k pmod p$$



Since $k$ is odd each $(-i)^k = -i^k$, and will cancel with the positive $i$ leaving a zero. Therefore,



$$sum_i = 1^p - 1i^k equiv 0 pmod p text if $k$ is odd. $$



I approached the case where $k$ is even in a similar fashion.



$$sum_i = 1^p - 1i^k equiv sum_i = 1^fracp - 12i^k + sum_i = 1^fracp - 12(-i)^k equiv 2(sum_i = 1^fracp - 12i^k) space pmod p$$



Since $p$ is prime, we just need to prove that $displaystylesum_i = 1^fracp - 12i^k equiv 0 pmod p$.



I was stumped after this, so I considered a counterexample, one where $k$ is divisible by $p - 1$. In that I considered a case where $p = 5, k = 8$:



$$1^8 + 2^8 + 3^8 + 4^8 equiv 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 space pmod p$$



This and a few other cases led to the conjecture that all the numbers below $p$ have a mod cycle $(mod space p)$ that is divisible by $p - 1$. I tested it with $p = 7$.



$2: 2, 4, colorred1$



$3: 3, 2, 6, 4, 5, colorred1$



$4: 4, 2, colorred1$



$5: 5, 4, 6, 2, 3, colorred1$



After this I was stuck. I couldn't see how this would help me solve the problem. And, more importantly, I couldn't prove my conjecture.










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 1




    Related : math.stackexchange.com/questions/226023/congruence-modulo-p/…
    – lab bhattacharjee
    Jul 2 '13 at 3:23










  • Related: math.stackexchange.com/questions/234745/…
    – lab bhattacharjee
    Jul 2 '13 at 3:26














up vote
8
down vote

favorite
2












Given a prime $p$ and a natural number $k$, such that $k$ is not divisible by $p - 1$, prove that $sum_i = 1^p - 1i^k equiv 0 pmod p$.



I split the proof into two cases: one where $k$ is odd and another where it is even.



The case where $k$ is odd can be proven as follows:



$$sum_i = 1^p - 1i^k equiv sum_i = 1^fracp - 12i^k + sum_i = 1^fracp - 12(-i)^k pmod p$$



Since $k$ is odd each $(-i)^k = -i^k$, and will cancel with the positive $i$ leaving a zero. Therefore,



$$sum_i = 1^p - 1i^k equiv 0 pmod p text if $k$ is odd. $$



I approached the case where $k$ is even in a similar fashion.



$$sum_i = 1^p - 1i^k equiv sum_i = 1^fracp - 12i^k + sum_i = 1^fracp - 12(-i)^k equiv 2(sum_i = 1^fracp - 12i^k) space pmod p$$



Since $p$ is prime, we just need to prove that $displaystylesum_i = 1^fracp - 12i^k equiv 0 pmod p$.



I was stumped after this, so I considered a counterexample, one where $k$ is divisible by $p - 1$. In that I considered a case where $p = 5, k = 8$:



$$1^8 + 2^8 + 3^8 + 4^8 equiv 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 space pmod p$$



This and a few other cases led to the conjecture that all the numbers below $p$ have a mod cycle $(mod space p)$ that is divisible by $p - 1$. I tested it with $p = 7$.



$2: 2, 4, colorred1$



$3: 3, 2, 6, 4, 5, colorred1$



$4: 4, 2, colorred1$



$5: 5, 4, 6, 2, 3, colorred1$



After this I was stuck. I couldn't see how this would help me solve the problem. And, more importantly, I couldn't prove my conjecture.










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 1




    Related : math.stackexchange.com/questions/226023/congruence-modulo-p/…
    – lab bhattacharjee
    Jul 2 '13 at 3:23










  • Related: math.stackexchange.com/questions/234745/…
    – lab bhattacharjee
    Jul 2 '13 at 3:26












up vote
8
down vote

favorite
2









up vote
8
down vote

favorite
2






2





Given a prime $p$ and a natural number $k$, such that $k$ is not divisible by $p - 1$, prove that $sum_i = 1^p - 1i^k equiv 0 pmod p$.



I split the proof into two cases: one where $k$ is odd and another where it is even.



The case where $k$ is odd can be proven as follows:



$$sum_i = 1^p - 1i^k equiv sum_i = 1^fracp - 12i^k + sum_i = 1^fracp - 12(-i)^k pmod p$$



Since $k$ is odd each $(-i)^k = -i^k$, and will cancel with the positive $i$ leaving a zero. Therefore,



$$sum_i = 1^p - 1i^k equiv 0 pmod p text if $k$ is odd. $$



I approached the case where $k$ is even in a similar fashion.



$$sum_i = 1^p - 1i^k equiv sum_i = 1^fracp - 12i^k + sum_i = 1^fracp - 12(-i)^k equiv 2(sum_i = 1^fracp - 12i^k) space pmod p$$



Since $p$ is prime, we just need to prove that $displaystylesum_i = 1^fracp - 12i^k equiv 0 pmod p$.



I was stumped after this, so I considered a counterexample, one where $k$ is divisible by $p - 1$. In that I considered a case where $p = 5, k = 8$:



$$1^8 + 2^8 + 3^8 + 4^8 equiv 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 space pmod p$$



This and a few other cases led to the conjecture that all the numbers below $p$ have a mod cycle $(mod space p)$ that is divisible by $p - 1$. I tested it with $p = 7$.



$2: 2, 4, colorred1$



$3: 3, 2, 6, 4, 5, colorred1$



$4: 4, 2, colorred1$



$5: 5, 4, 6, 2, 3, colorred1$



After this I was stuck. I couldn't see how this would help me solve the problem. And, more importantly, I couldn't prove my conjecture.










share|cite|improve this question















Given a prime $p$ and a natural number $k$, such that $k$ is not divisible by $p - 1$, prove that $sum_i = 1^p - 1i^k equiv 0 pmod p$.



I split the proof into two cases: one where $k$ is odd and another where it is even.



The case where $k$ is odd can be proven as follows:



$$sum_i = 1^p - 1i^k equiv sum_i = 1^fracp - 12i^k + sum_i = 1^fracp - 12(-i)^k pmod p$$



Since $k$ is odd each $(-i)^k = -i^k$, and will cancel with the positive $i$ leaving a zero. Therefore,



$$sum_i = 1^p - 1i^k equiv 0 pmod p text if $k$ is odd. $$



I approached the case where $k$ is even in a similar fashion.



$$sum_i = 1^p - 1i^k equiv sum_i = 1^fracp - 12i^k + sum_i = 1^fracp - 12(-i)^k equiv 2(sum_i = 1^fracp - 12i^k) space pmod p$$



Since $p$ is prime, we just need to prove that $displaystylesum_i = 1^fracp - 12i^k equiv 0 pmod p$.



I was stumped after this, so I considered a counterexample, one where $k$ is divisible by $p - 1$. In that I considered a case where $p = 5, k = 8$:



$$1^8 + 2^8 + 3^8 + 4^8 equiv 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 space pmod p$$



This and a few other cases led to the conjecture that all the numbers below $p$ have a mod cycle $(mod space p)$ that is divisible by $p - 1$. I tested it with $p = 7$.



$2: 2, 4, colorred1$



$3: 3, 2, 6, 4, 5, colorred1$



$4: 4, 2, colorred1$



$5: 5, 4, 6, 2, 3, colorred1$



After this I was stuck. I couldn't see how this would help me solve the problem. And, more importantly, I couldn't prove my conjecture.







number-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 1 '13 at 18:56









George V. Williams

4,45121646




4,45121646










asked Jul 1 '13 at 14:11









Gerard

1,97521333




1,97521333







  • 1




    Related : math.stackexchange.com/questions/226023/congruence-modulo-p/…
    – lab bhattacharjee
    Jul 2 '13 at 3:23










  • Related: math.stackexchange.com/questions/234745/…
    – lab bhattacharjee
    Jul 2 '13 at 3:26












  • 1




    Related : math.stackexchange.com/questions/226023/congruence-modulo-p/…
    – lab bhattacharjee
    Jul 2 '13 at 3:23










  • Related: math.stackexchange.com/questions/234745/…
    – lab bhattacharjee
    Jul 2 '13 at 3:26







1




1




Related : math.stackexchange.com/questions/226023/congruence-modulo-p/…
– lab bhattacharjee
Jul 2 '13 at 3:23




Related : math.stackexchange.com/questions/226023/congruence-modulo-p/…
– lab bhattacharjee
Jul 2 '13 at 3:23












Related: math.stackexchange.com/questions/234745/…
– lab bhattacharjee
Jul 2 '13 at 3:26




Related: math.stackexchange.com/questions/234745/…
– lab bhattacharjee
Jul 2 '13 at 3:26










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote



accepted










HINT:



As $i,1le ile p-1$ forms Reduced Residue System $pmod p,$



and so does $g^r,$ for $0le rle p-2$ where $g$ is a primitive root of $p$



$$textSo, sum_1le ile p-1i^kequivsum_0le rle p-2(g^r)^kpmod p$$



$$textNow, sum_0le rle p-2(g^r)^k=frac(g^k)^p-1-1g^k-1=frac(g^p-1)^k-1g^k-1$$



Using Fermat's Little Theorem, $g^p-1equiv1pmod pimplies (g^p-1)^kequiv1pmod piff (g^p-1)^k-1equiv0pmod p$



As $g$ is a primitive root of $p,textord_pg=p-1implies g^knotequiv1pmod p$ as $k$ is not divisible by $p-1$



$implies (g^k-1,p)=1implies frac(g^p-1)^k-1g^k-1equiv0pmod p$



$implies sum_1le ile p-1i^kequivsum_0le rle p-2(g^r)^kequiv frac(g^p-1)^k-1g^k-1equiv0pmod p$






share|cite|improve this answer





























    up vote
    4
    down vote













    Let $b$ be any number relatively prime to $p$. Recall that the numbers $b, 2b, 3b, 4b, dots, (p-1)b$ are a reduced residue class modulo $p$. This means that $b,2b,3b,dots, (p-1)b$ travel, modulo $p$, through $1,2,3,dots, p-1$ in some order.



    It follows that
    $$b^k+(2b)^k+(3b)^k+cdots +((p-1)b)^k equiv 1^k+2^k+3^k +cdots +(p-1)^kpmodptag1$$
    But $(ib)^k=b^ki^k$, so we can rewrite (1) as
    $$(b^k-1)left(1^k+2^k+3^k+cdots +(p-1)^kright)equiv 0pmodp.tag2$$



    Let $b$ have order $p-1$ modulo $p$. So we are letting $b$ be a primitive root of $p$. Since $p-1$ does not divide $k$, we have $b^k notequiv 1pmodp$. Then it follows from (2) that $1^k+2^k+3^k+cdots +(p-1)^k equiv 0pmodp$.






    share|cite|improve this answer





























      up vote
      2
      down vote













      All nonzero numbers less than p are roots of $x^p-1=1$ (mod p). Thus, all the elementary symmetric polynomials in these number of order less than p-1 are zero (mod p), so any symmetric polynomial in these numbers of order less than p-1 must be zero (mod p).






      share|cite|improve this answer




















      • Really neat! :)
        – Rodrigo
        Jan 18 '14 at 14:35










      Your Answer




      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: false,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f433678%2fsums-of-powers-below-a-prime%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest






























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      3
      down vote



      accepted










      HINT:



      As $i,1le ile p-1$ forms Reduced Residue System $pmod p,$



      and so does $g^r,$ for $0le rle p-2$ where $g$ is a primitive root of $p$



      $$textSo, sum_1le ile p-1i^kequivsum_0le rle p-2(g^r)^kpmod p$$



      $$textNow, sum_0le rle p-2(g^r)^k=frac(g^k)^p-1-1g^k-1=frac(g^p-1)^k-1g^k-1$$



      Using Fermat's Little Theorem, $g^p-1equiv1pmod pimplies (g^p-1)^kequiv1pmod piff (g^p-1)^k-1equiv0pmod p$



      As $g$ is a primitive root of $p,textord_pg=p-1implies g^knotequiv1pmod p$ as $k$ is not divisible by $p-1$



      $implies (g^k-1,p)=1implies frac(g^p-1)^k-1g^k-1equiv0pmod p$



      $implies sum_1le ile p-1i^kequivsum_0le rle p-2(g^r)^kequiv frac(g^p-1)^k-1g^k-1equiv0pmod p$






      share|cite|improve this answer


























        up vote
        3
        down vote



        accepted










        HINT:



        As $i,1le ile p-1$ forms Reduced Residue System $pmod p,$



        and so does $g^r,$ for $0le rle p-2$ where $g$ is a primitive root of $p$



        $$textSo, sum_1le ile p-1i^kequivsum_0le rle p-2(g^r)^kpmod p$$



        $$textNow, sum_0le rle p-2(g^r)^k=frac(g^k)^p-1-1g^k-1=frac(g^p-1)^k-1g^k-1$$



        Using Fermat's Little Theorem, $g^p-1equiv1pmod pimplies (g^p-1)^kequiv1pmod piff (g^p-1)^k-1equiv0pmod p$



        As $g$ is a primitive root of $p,textord_pg=p-1implies g^knotequiv1pmod p$ as $k$ is not divisible by $p-1$



        $implies (g^k-1,p)=1implies frac(g^p-1)^k-1g^k-1equiv0pmod p$



        $implies sum_1le ile p-1i^kequivsum_0le rle p-2(g^r)^kequiv frac(g^p-1)^k-1g^k-1equiv0pmod p$






        share|cite|improve this answer
























          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted






          HINT:



          As $i,1le ile p-1$ forms Reduced Residue System $pmod p,$



          and so does $g^r,$ for $0le rle p-2$ where $g$ is a primitive root of $p$



          $$textSo, sum_1le ile p-1i^kequivsum_0le rle p-2(g^r)^kpmod p$$



          $$textNow, sum_0le rle p-2(g^r)^k=frac(g^k)^p-1-1g^k-1=frac(g^p-1)^k-1g^k-1$$



          Using Fermat's Little Theorem, $g^p-1equiv1pmod pimplies (g^p-1)^kequiv1pmod piff (g^p-1)^k-1equiv0pmod p$



          As $g$ is a primitive root of $p,textord_pg=p-1implies g^knotequiv1pmod p$ as $k$ is not divisible by $p-1$



          $implies (g^k-1,p)=1implies frac(g^p-1)^k-1g^k-1equiv0pmod p$



          $implies sum_1le ile p-1i^kequivsum_0le rle p-2(g^r)^kequiv frac(g^p-1)^k-1g^k-1equiv0pmod p$






          share|cite|improve this answer














          HINT:



          As $i,1le ile p-1$ forms Reduced Residue System $pmod p,$



          and so does $g^r,$ for $0le rle p-2$ where $g$ is a primitive root of $p$



          $$textSo, sum_1le ile p-1i^kequivsum_0le rle p-2(g^r)^kpmod p$$



          $$textNow, sum_0le rle p-2(g^r)^k=frac(g^k)^p-1-1g^k-1=frac(g^p-1)^k-1g^k-1$$



          Using Fermat's Little Theorem, $g^p-1equiv1pmod pimplies (g^p-1)^kequiv1pmod piff (g^p-1)^k-1equiv0pmod p$



          As $g$ is a primitive root of $p,textord_pg=p-1implies g^knotequiv1pmod p$ as $k$ is not divisible by $p-1$



          $implies (g^k-1,p)=1implies frac(g^p-1)^k-1g^k-1equiv0pmod p$



          $implies sum_1le ile p-1i^kequivsum_0le rle p-2(g^r)^kequiv frac(g^p-1)^k-1g^k-1equiv0pmod p$







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jul 1 '13 at 14:29

























          answered Jul 1 '13 at 14:18









          lab bhattacharjee

          216k14153266




          216k14153266




















              up vote
              4
              down vote













              Let $b$ be any number relatively prime to $p$. Recall that the numbers $b, 2b, 3b, 4b, dots, (p-1)b$ are a reduced residue class modulo $p$. This means that $b,2b,3b,dots, (p-1)b$ travel, modulo $p$, through $1,2,3,dots, p-1$ in some order.



              It follows that
              $$b^k+(2b)^k+(3b)^k+cdots +((p-1)b)^k equiv 1^k+2^k+3^k +cdots +(p-1)^kpmodptag1$$
              But $(ib)^k=b^ki^k$, so we can rewrite (1) as
              $$(b^k-1)left(1^k+2^k+3^k+cdots +(p-1)^kright)equiv 0pmodp.tag2$$



              Let $b$ have order $p-1$ modulo $p$. So we are letting $b$ be a primitive root of $p$. Since $p-1$ does not divide $k$, we have $b^k notequiv 1pmodp$. Then it follows from (2) that $1^k+2^k+3^k+cdots +(p-1)^k equiv 0pmodp$.






              share|cite|improve this answer


























                up vote
                4
                down vote













                Let $b$ be any number relatively prime to $p$. Recall that the numbers $b, 2b, 3b, 4b, dots, (p-1)b$ are a reduced residue class modulo $p$. This means that $b,2b,3b,dots, (p-1)b$ travel, modulo $p$, through $1,2,3,dots, p-1$ in some order.



                It follows that
                $$b^k+(2b)^k+(3b)^k+cdots +((p-1)b)^k equiv 1^k+2^k+3^k +cdots +(p-1)^kpmodptag1$$
                But $(ib)^k=b^ki^k$, so we can rewrite (1) as
                $$(b^k-1)left(1^k+2^k+3^k+cdots +(p-1)^kright)equiv 0pmodp.tag2$$



                Let $b$ have order $p-1$ modulo $p$. So we are letting $b$ be a primitive root of $p$. Since $p-1$ does not divide $k$, we have $b^k notequiv 1pmodp$. Then it follows from (2) that $1^k+2^k+3^k+cdots +(p-1)^k equiv 0pmodp$.






                share|cite|improve this answer
























                  up vote
                  4
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  4
                  down vote









                  Let $b$ be any number relatively prime to $p$. Recall that the numbers $b, 2b, 3b, 4b, dots, (p-1)b$ are a reduced residue class modulo $p$. This means that $b,2b,3b,dots, (p-1)b$ travel, modulo $p$, through $1,2,3,dots, p-1$ in some order.



                  It follows that
                  $$b^k+(2b)^k+(3b)^k+cdots +((p-1)b)^k equiv 1^k+2^k+3^k +cdots +(p-1)^kpmodptag1$$
                  But $(ib)^k=b^ki^k$, so we can rewrite (1) as
                  $$(b^k-1)left(1^k+2^k+3^k+cdots +(p-1)^kright)equiv 0pmodp.tag2$$



                  Let $b$ have order $p-1$ modulo $p$. So we are letting $b$ be a primitive root of $p$. Since $p-1$ does not divide $k$, we have $b^k notequiv 1pmodp$. Then it follows from (2) that $1^k+2^k+3^k+cdots +(p-1)^k equiv 0pmodp$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  Let $b$ be any number relatively prime to $p$. Recall that the numbers $b, 2b, 3b, 4b, dots, (p-1)b$ are a reduced residue class modulo $p$. This means that $b,2b,3b,dots, (p-1)b$ travel, modulo $p$, through $1,2,3,dots, p-1$ in some order.



                  It follows that
                  $$b^k+(2b)^k+(3b)^k+cdots +((p-1)b)^k equiv 1^k+2^k+3^k +cdots +(p-1)^kpmodptag1$$
                  But $(ib)^k=b^ki^k$, so we can rewrite (1) as
                  $$(b^k-1)left(1^k+2^k+3^k+cdots +(p-1)^kright)equiv 0pmodp.tag2$$



                  Let $b$ have order $p-1$ modulo $p$. So we are letting $b$ be a primitive root of $p$. Since $p-1$ does not divide $k$, we have $b^k notequiv 1pmodp$. Then it follows from (2) that $1^k+2^k+3^k+cdots +(p-1)^k equiv 0pmodp$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Sep 10 at 13:52









                  darij grinberg

                  9,47132960




                  9,47132960










                  answered Jul 1 '13 at 15:22









                  André Nicolas

                  447k36415793




                  447k36415793




















                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote













                      All nonzero numbers less than p are roots of $x^p-1=1$ (mod p). Thus, all the elementary symmetric polynomials in these number of order less than p-1 are zero (mod p), so any symmetric polynomial in these numbers of order less than p-1 must be zero (mod p).






                      share|cite|improve this answer




















                      • Really neat! :)
                        – Rodrigo
                        Jan 18 '14 at 14:35














                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote













                      All nonzero numbers less than p are roots of $x^p-1=1$ (mod p). Thus, all the elementary symmetric polynomials in these number of order less than p-1 are zero (mod p), so any symmetric polynomial in these numbers of order less than p-1 must be zero (mod p).






                      share|cite|improve this answer




















                      • Really neat! :)
                        – Rodrigo
                        Jan 18 '14 at 14:35












                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote









                      All nonzero numbers less than p are roots of $x^p-1=1$ (mod p). Thus, all the elementary symmetric polynomials in these number of order less than p-1 are zero (mod p), so any symmetric polynomial in these numbers of order less than p-1 must be zero (mod p).






                      share|cite|improve this answer












                      All nonzero numbers less than p are roots of $x^p-1=1$ (mod p). Thus, all the elementary symmetric polynomials in these number of order less than p-1 are zero (mod p), so any symmetric polynomial in these numbers of order less than p-1 must be zero (mod p).







                      share|cite|improve this answer












                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer










                      answered Jul 1 '13 at 18:54









                      Bill Kleinhans

                      1,24067




                      1,24067











                      • Really neat! :)
                        – Rodrigo
                        Jan 18 '14 at 14:35
















                      • Really neat! :)
                        – Rodrigo
                        Jan 18 '14 at 14:35















                      Really neat! :)
                      – Rodrigo
                      Jan 18 '14 at 14:35




                      Really neat! :)
                      – Rodrigo
                      Jan 18 '14 at 14:35

















                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded















































                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f433678%2fsums-of-powers-below-a-prime%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest













































































                      這個網誌中的熱門文章

                      tkz-euclide: tkzDrawCircle[R] not working

                      How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

                      1st Magritte Awards