Demonstrate $A subseteq P(cup A)$

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
-2
down vote

favorite












$A$ is a set



$P(A)=B$



$ cup A = x $



My try:



If $Csubseteq A$ if there is $xin C$, tal que $xin cup A$



then $xsubseteq P(cup A)$



I fell like this last step is not quite right.










share|cite|improve this question



























    up vote
    -2
    down vote

    favorite












    $A$ is a set



    $P(A)=B$



    $ cup A = x $



    My try:



    If $Csubseteq A$ if there is $xin C$, tal que $xin cup A$



    then $xsubseteq P(cup A)$



    I fell like this last step is not quite right.










    share|cite|improve this question

























      up vote
      -2
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      -2
      down vote

      favorite











      $A$ is a set



      $P(A)=B$



      $ cup A = x $



      My try:



      If $Csubseteq A$ if there is $xin C$, tal que $xin cup A$



      then $xsubseteq P(cup A)$



      I fell like this last step is not quite right.










      share|cite|improve this question















      $A$ is a set



      $P(A)=B$



      $ cup A = x $



      My try:



      If $Csubseteq A$ if there is $xin C$, tal que $xin cup A$



      then $xsubseteq P(cup A)$



      I fell like this last step is not quite right.







      elementary-set-theory






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Sep 10 at 19:06

























      asked Sep 10 at 18:51









      Sebas Martinez Santos

      106




      106




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          Take $xin A:$ you want to prove that it is an element of $mathcalP(cup A),$ so you prove that $Asubseteq mathcalP(cup A).$



          Actually you can write $x$ as $ ain x.$ From this point of view it is clear that $x$ is a subset of $cup A$ and so it belongs to the set $mathcalP(cup A).$






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • But by definition $cup A$ does not have any subsets, they are just elements. For example: $A=1,2,3$ then $cup A=1,2,3$. What do you think? }
            – Sebas Martinez Santos
            Sep 10 at 19:17







          • 2




            @SebasMartinezSantos You are correct that $bigcup A = 1,2,3$ in your example. You say "by definition $bigcup A$ does not have any subsets..." Every set has subsets, including those sets which are sets of sets or otherwise. In your example $bigcup A$ has the following eight subsets: $emptyset, 1,2,3,1,2dots,1,2,3$. As such the power set of $bigcup A$ would be $emptyset,1,2,dots,2,3,1,2,3$. You may have meant to say $bigcup A$ does not have any sets as elements, which has a different meaning.
            – JMoravitz
            Sep 10 at 19:33











          • Exactly, be careful Sebas that an element of A can be a set itself.
            – Riccardo Ceccon
            Sep 10 at 20:10










          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2912223%2fdemonstrate-a-subseteq-p-cup-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          1
          down vote













          Take $xin A:$ you want to prove that it is an element of $mathcalP(cup A),$ so you prove that $Asubseteq mathcalP(cup A).$



          Actually you can write $x$ as $ ain x.$ From this point of view it is clear that $x$ is a subset of $cup A$ and so it belongs to the set $mathcalP(cup A).$






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • But by definition $cup A$ does not have any subsets, they are just elements. For example: $A=1,2,3$ then $cup A=1,2,3$. What do you think? }
            – Sebas Martinez Santos
            Sep 10 at 19:17







          • 2




            @SebasMartinezSantos You are correct that $bigcup A = 1,2,3$ in your example. You say "by definition $bigcup A$ does not have any subsets..." Every set has subsets, including those sets which are sets of sets or otherwise. In your example $bigcup A$ has the following eight subsets: $emptyset, 1,2,3,1,2dots,1,2,3$. As such the power set of $bigcup A$ would be $emptyset,1,2,dots,2,3,1,2,3$. You may have meant to say $bigcup A$ does not have any sets as elements, which has a different meaning.
            – JMoravitz
            Sep 10 at 19:33











          • Exactly, be careful Sebas that an element of A can be a set itself.
            – Riccardo Ceccon
            Sep 10 at 20:10














          up vote
          1
          down vote













          Take $xin A:$ you want to prove that it is an element of $mathcalP(cup A),$ so you prove that $Asubseteq mathcalP(cup A).$



          Actually you can write $x$ as $ ain x.$ From this point of view it is clear that $x$ is a subset of $cup A$ and so it belongs to the set $mathcalP(cup A).$






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • But by definition $cup A$ does not have any subsets, they are just elements. For example: $A=1,2,3$ then $cup A=1,2,3$. What do you think? }
            – Sebas Martinez Santos
            Sep 10 at 19:17







          • 2




            @SebasMartinezSantos You are correct that $bigcup A = 1,2,3$ in your example. You say "by definition $bigcup A$ does not have any subsets..." Every set has subsets, including those sets which are sets of sets or otherwise. In your example $bigcup A$ has the following eight subsets: $emptyset, 1,2,3,1,2dots,1,2,3$. As such the power set of $bigcup A$ would be $emptyset,1,2,dots,2,3,1,2,3$. You may have meant to say $bigcup A$ does not have any sets as elements, which has a different meaning.
            – JMoravitz
            Sep 10 at 19:33











          • Exactly, be careful Sebas that an element of A can be a set itself.
            – Riccardo Ceccon
            Sep 10 at 20:10












          up vote
          1
          down vote










          up vote
          1
          down vote









          Take $xin A:$ you want to prove that it is an element of $mathcalP(cup A),$ so you prove that $Asubseteq mathcalP(cup A).$



          Actually you can write $x$ as $ ain x.$ From this point of view it is clear that $x$ is a subset of $cup A$ and so it belongs to the set $mathcalP(cup A).$






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Take $xin A:$ you want to prove that it is an element of $mathcalP(cup A),$ so you prove that $Asubseteq mathcalP(cup A).$



          Actually you can write $x$ as $ ain x.$ From this point of view it is clear that $x$ is a subset of $cup A$ and so it belongs to the set $mathcalP(cup A).$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Sep 10 at 18:59









          Riccardo Ceccon

          875320




          875320











          • But by definition $cup A$ does not have any subsets, they are just elements. For example: $A=1,2,3$ then $cup A=1,2,3$. What do you think? }
            – Sebas Martinez Santos
            Sep 10 at 19:17







          • 2




            @SebasMartinezSantos You are correct that $bigcup A = 1,2,3$ in your example. You say "by definition $bigcup A$ does not have any subsets..." Every set has subsets, including those sets which are sets of sets or otherwise. In your example $bigcup A$ has the following eight subsets: $emptyset, 1,2,3,1,2dots,1,2,3$. As such the power set of $bigcup A$ would be $emptyset,1,2,dots,2,3,1,2,3$. You may have meant to say $bigcup A$ does not have any sets as elements, which has a different meaning.
            – JMoravitz
            Sep 10 at 19:33











          • Exactly, be careful Sebas that an element of A can be a set itself.
            – Riccardo Ceccon
            Sep 10 at 20:10
















          • But by definition $cup A$ does not have any subsets, they are just elements. For example: $A=1,2,3$ then $cup A=1,2,3$. What do you think? }
            – Sebas Martinez Santos
            Sep 10 at 19:17







          • 2




            @SebasMartinezSantos You are correct that $bigcup A = 1,2,3$ in your example. You say "by definition $bigcup A$ does not have any subsets..." Every set has subsets, including those sets which are sets of sets or otherwise. In your example $bigcup A$ has the following eight subsets: $emptyset, 1,2,3,1,2dots,1,2,3$. As such the power set of $bigcup A$ would be $emptyset,1,2,dots,2,3,1,2,3$. You may have meant to say $bigcup A$ does not have any sets as elements, which has a different meaning.
            – JMoravitz
            Sep 10 at 19:33











          • Exactly, be careful Sebas that an element of A can be a set itself.
            – Riccardo Ceccon
            Sep 10 at 20:10















          But by definition $cup A$ does not have any subsets, they are just elements. For example: $A=1,2,3$ then $cup A=1,2,3$. What do you think? }
          – Sebas Martinez Santos
          Sep 10 at 19:17





          But by definition $cup A$ does not have any subsets, they are just elements. For example: $A=1,2,3$ then $cup A=1,2,3$. What do you think? }
          – Sebas Martinez Santos
          Sep 10 at 19:17





          2




          2




          @SebasMartinezSantos You are correct that $bigcup A = 1,2,3$ in your example. You say "by definition $bigcup A$ does not have any subsets..." Every set has subsets, including those sets which are sets of sets or otherwise. In your example $bigcup A$ has the following eight subsets: $emptyset, 1,2,3,1,2dots,1,2,3$. As such the power set of $bigcup A$ would be $emptyset,1,2,dots,2,3,1,2,3$. You may have meant to say $bigcup A$ does not have any sets as elements, which has a different meaning.
          – JMoravitz
          Sep 10 at 19:33





          @SebasMartinezSantos You are correct that $bigcup A = 1,2,3$ in your example. You say "by definition $bigcup A$ does not have any subsets..." Every set has subsets, including those sets which are sets of sets or otherwise. In your example $bigcup A$ has the following eight subsets: $emptyset, 1,2,3,1,2dots,1,2,3$. As such the power set of $bigcup A$ would be $emptyset,1,2,dots,2,3,1,2,3$. You may have meant to say $bigcup A$ does not have any sets as elements, which has a different meaning.
          – JMoravitz
          Sep 10 at 19:33













          Exactly, be careful Sebas that an element of A can be a set itself.
          – Riccardo Ceccon
          Sep 10 at 20:10




          Exactly, be careful Sebas that an element of A can be a set itself.
          – Riccardo Ceccon
          Sep 10 at 20:10

















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2912223%2fdemonstrate-a-subseteq-p-cup-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

          Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

          Carbon dioxide