If $alpha^3+4kalpha-k=0$ with $kgeq 1$ is odd, then $mathbbQ(alpha)$ has even class number.
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
This is an exercise found in course notes I have for an introductory course in class field theory and it has been bugging me a for long time.
So $K=mathbbQ(alpha)$, with $alpha$ a root of $f=X^3+4kX-k$. Here $kgeq 1$ is an odd integer. The polynomial $f$ is irreducible by Perron's criterion, although that uses maybe a bit much. We have $Delta(f)=-k^2(256k+27)$ hence $mathrmGal(f)cong S_3$.
I tried to find an unramified quadratic extension of $K$, which would imply the result as such an extension is clearly Abelian and hence contained in the Hilbert class field of $K$. The first candidate would be its normal closure $K(sqrtDelta(f))=K(sqrt-256k-27)$, but $K(sqrt-256k-27)/K$ is ramified at the real place of $K$.
I next tried to consider $K(sqrtd)$ for any square-free integer $dneq 1$, but this also cannot happen: if $K(sqrtd)/K$ is unramified then $d>1$ because $K(sqrtd)$ has to be totally real. As $2$ doesn't divide $Delta(f)$ we see that $2$ is unramified in $K(sqrtd)/mathbbQ$, hence also in $mathbbQ(sqrtd)$ so $dequiv 1bmod 4$. Thus if $p$ is a rational prime dividing $d$ we have $pneq 2$ and $p$ ramifies in $mathbbQ(sqrtd)$. There are now three cases.
- If $p$ is unramified in $K$ then clearly $K(sqrtd)/K$ cannot be unramified as then $K(sqrtd)/mathbbQ$ would be unramified while it contains $mathbbQ(sqrtd)$
- If $p$ is ramified in $K$ as $pmathcalO_K=mathfrakp^2mathfrakq$, then we have tame ramification of $p$ in $K$, and Abhyankar's implies that $mathfrakp$ is unramified in $K(sqrtd)$.
However $mathfrakq$ still ramifies in $K(sqrtd)$ because of $mathbbQ(sqrtd)$. - If $p$ is totally ramified in $K$ then $p$ is totally ramified in $K(sqrtd)$, because $e(mathfrakB|p)$ is divisible by both $2$ and $3$ in that case for a prime $mathfrakB$ of $K(sqrtd)$. Thus also in this last case we have a contradiction.
So this also doesn't work. I also don't see how working with something like $K(sqrtalpha)/K$ should work as $mathcalO_K$ is not always equal to $mathbbZ[alpha]$: the index $[mathcalO_K:mathbbZ[alpha]]$ can be anything as far as I can tell. Thus I don't see how I can do calculations on explicit primes of a ring like $mathcalO_K[sqrtalpha]$.
Does anyone know the answer?
Edit: Okey, so after using Magma's command IsUnramified on $K(sqrtw)/K$ for various values of $k$ and $winmathbbZ[alpha]$, I found that for $k$ up to say $1000$ we have that $K(sqrtkalpha)/K$ is unramified. However I'm still a bit annoyed with this because a) I have no idea how to prove this (for the finite primes), and b) I have no idea how this seems like a logical thing to try. Surely I must be missing something?
algebraic-number-theory class-field-theory
add a comment |Â
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
This is an exercise found in course notes I have for an introductory course in class field theory and it has been bugging me a for long time.
So $K=mathbbQ(alpha)$, with $alpha$ a root of $f=X^3+4kX-k$. Here $kgeq 1$ is an odd integer. The polynomial $f$ is irreducible by Perron's criterion, although that uses maybe a bit much. We have $Delta(f)=-k^2(256k+27)$ hence $mathrmGal(f)cong S_3$.
I tried to find an unramified quadratic extension of $K$, which would imply the result as such an extension is clearly Abelian and hence contained in the Hilbert class field of $K$. The first candidate would be its normal closure $K(sqrtDelta(f))=K(sqrt-256k-27)$, but $K(sqrt-256k-27)/K$ is ramified at the real place of $K$.
I next tried to consider $K(sqrtd)$ for any square-free integer $dneq 1$, but this also cannot happen: if $K(sqrtd)/K$ is unramified then $d>1$ because $K(sqrtd)$ has to be totally real. As $2$ doesn't divide $Delta(f)$ we see that $2$ is unramified in $K(sqrtd)/mathbbQ$, hence also in $mathbbQ(sqrtd)$ so $dequiv 1bmod 4$. Thus if $p$ is a rational prime dividing $d$ we have $pneq 2$ and $p$ ramifies in $mathbbQ(sqrtd)$. There are now three cases.
- If $p$ is unramified in $K$ then clearly $K(sqrtd)/K$ cannot be unramified as then $K(sqrtd)/mathbbQ$ would be unramified while it contains $mathbbQ(sqrtd)$
- If $p$ is ramified in $K$ as $pmathcalO_K=mathfrakp^2mathfrakq$, then we have tame ramification of $p$ in $K$, and Abhyankar's implies that $mathfrakp$ is unramified in $K(sqrtd)$.
However $mathfrakq$ still ramifies in $K(sqrtd)$ because of $mathbbQ(sqrtd)$. - If $p$ is totally ramified in $K$ then $p$ is totally ramified in $K(sqrtd)$, because $e(mathfrakB|p)$ is divisible by both $2$ and $3$ in that case for a prime $mathfrakB$ of $K(sqrtd)$. Thus also in this last case we have a contradiction.
So this also doesn't work. I also don't see how working with something like $K(sqrtalpha)/K$ should work as $mathcalO_K$ is not always equal to $mathbbZ[alpha]$: the index $[mathcalO_K:mathbbZ[alpha]]$ can be anything as far as I can tell. Thus I don't see how I can do calculations on explicit primes of a ring like $mathcalO_K[sqrtalpha]$.
Does anyone know the answer?
Edit: Okey, so after using Magma's command IsUnramified on $K(sqrtw)/K$ for various values of $k$ and $winmathbbZ[alpha]$, I found that for $k$ up to say $1000$ we have that $K(sqrtkalpha)/K$ is unramified. However I'm still a bit annoyed with this because a) I have no idea how to prove this (for the finite primes), and b) I have no idea how this seems like a logical thing to try. Surely I must be missing something?
algebraic-number-theory class-field-theory
Here's an idea, which might help you. After some lengthy computation you can prove that $operatornamedisc mathbbZ[alpha]$ is an odd integer and thus $2 nmid [mathcal O_K: mathbbZ[alpha]$. This enables us to factor $2mathcal O_K$, as $(2,alpha - 1)(2,alpha^2 + alpha + 1)$. Now checking by computer for some lower values of $k$ we notice that $(2,alpha - 1)$ has even order in the ideal group of $K/mathbbQ$. However I don't see a way of proving this.
â Stefan4024
Sep 10 at 20:57
Thank you for the idea, but I don't see either how that could be done. I also checked with a computer but the orders seem to become immense as $k$ becomes large unfortunately. It was an exercise right after a chapter discussing the basic properties of ray class fields (and the Hilbert class field), so I really think the solution is to construct an unramified quadratic extension. Other exercises near it also use this angle to obtain information about the class group. Also: $mathrmdiscmathbbZ[alpha]=Delta(f)$ which is clearly odd, is that a lengthy computation?
â Tim.ev
Sep 10 at 21:17
I used the formula $operatornamedisc mathbbZ[alpha] = -(-1)^fracn(n+1)2N(f'(alpha))$
â Stefan4024
Sep 10 at 21:49
add a comment |Â
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
This is an exercise found in course notes I have for an introductory course in class field theory and it has been bugging me a for long time.
So $K=mathbbQ(alpha)$, with $alpha$ a root of $f=X^3+4kX-k$. Here $kgeq 1$ is an odd integer. The polynomial $f$ is irreducible by Perron's criterion, although that uses maybe a bit much. We have $Delta(f)=-k^2(256k+27)$ hence $mathrmGal(f)cong S_3$.
I tried to find an unramified quadratic extension of $K$, which would imply the result as such an extension is clearly Abelian and hence contained in the Hilbert class field of $K$. The first candidate would be its normal closure $K(sqrtDelta(f))=K(sqrt-256k-27)$, but $K(sqrt-256k-27)/K$ is ramified at the real place of $K$.
I next tried to consider $K(sqrtd)$ for any square-free integer $dneq 1$, but this also cannot happen: if $K(sqrtd)/K$ is unramified then $d>1$ because $K(sqrtd)$ has to be totally real. As $2$ doesn't divide $Delta(f)$ we see that $2$ is unramified in $K(sqrtd)/mathbbQ$, hence also in $mathbbQ(sqrtd)$ so $dequiv 1bmod 4$. Thus if $p$ is a rational prime dividing $d$ we have $pneq 2$ and $p$ ramifies in $mathbbQ(sqrtd)$. There are now three cases.
- If $p$ is unramified in $K$ then clearly $K(sqrtd)/K$ cannot be unramified as then $K(sqrtd)/mathbbQ$ would be unramified while it contains $mathbbQ(sqrtd)$
- If $p$ is ramified in $K$ as $pmathcalO_K=mathfrakp^2mathfrakq$, then we have tame ramification of $p$ in $K$, and Abhyankar's implies that $mathfrakp$ is unramified in $K(sqrtd)$.
However $mathfrakq$ still ramifies in $K(sqrtd)$ because of $mathbbQ(sqrtd)$. - If $p$ is totally ramified in $K$ then $p$ is totally ramified in $K(sqrtd)$, because $e(mathfrakB|p)$ is divisible by both $2$ and $3$ in that case for a prime $mathfrakB$ of $K(sqrtd)$. Thus also in this last case we have a contradiction.
So this also doesn't work. I also don't see how working with something like $K(sqrtalpha)/K$ should work as $mathcalO_K$ is not always equal to $mathbbZ[alpha]$: the index $[mathcalO_K:mathbbZ[alpha]]$ can be anything as far as I can tell. Thus I don't see how I can do calculations on explicit primes of a ring like $mathcalO_K[sqrtalpha]$.
Does anyone know the answer?
Edit: Okey, so after using Magma's command IsUnramified on $K(sqrtw)/K$ for various values of $k$ and $winmathbbZ[alpha]$, I found that for $k$ up to say $1000$ we have that $K(sqrtkalpha)/K$ is unramified. However I'm still a bit annoyed with this because a) I have no idea how to prove this (for the finite primes), and b) I have no idea how this seems like a logical thing to try. Surely I must be missing something?
algebraic-number-theory class-field-theory
This is an exercise found in course notes I have for an introductory course in class field theory and it has been bugging me a for long time.
So $K=mathbbQ(alpha)$, with $alpha$ a root of $f=X^3+4kX-k$. Here $kgeq 1$ is an odd integer. The polynomial $f$ is irreducible by Perron's criterion, although that uses maybe a bit much. We have $Delta(f)=-k^2(256k+27)$ hence $mathrmGal(f)cong S_3$.
I tried to find an unramified quadratic extension of $K$, which would imply the result as such an extension is clearly Abelian and hence contained in the Hilbert class field of $K$. The first candidate would be its normal closure $K(sqrtDelta(f))=K(sqrt-256k-27)$, but $K(sqrt-256k-27)/K$ is ramified at the real place of $K$.
I next tried to consider $K(sqrtd)$ for any square-free integer $dneq 1$, but this also cannot happen: if $K(sqrtd)/K$ is unramified then $d>1$ because $K(sqrtd)$ has to be totally real. As $2$ doesn't divide $Delta(f)$ we see that $2$ is unramified in $K(sqrtd)/mathbbQ$, hence also in $mathbbQ(sqrtd)$ so $dequiv 1bmod 4$. Thus if $p$ is a rational prime dividing $d$ we have $pneq 2$ and $p$ ramifies in $mathbbQ(sqrtd)$. There are now three cases.
- If $p$ is unramified in $K$ then clearly $K(sqrtd)/K$ cannot be unramified as then $K(sqrtd)/mathbbQ$ would be unramified while it contains $mathbbQ(sqrtd)$
- If $p$ is ramified in $K$ as $pmathcalO_K=mathfrakp^2mathfrakq$, then we have tame ramification of $p$ in $K$, and Abhyankar's implies that $mathfrakp$ is unramified in $K(sqrtd)$.
However $mathfrakq$ still ramifies in $K(sqrtd)$ because of $mathbbQ(sqrtd)$. - If $p$ is totally ramified in $K$ then $p$ is totally ramified in $K(sqrtd)$, because $e(mathfrakB|p)$ is divisible by both $2$ and $3$ in that case for a prime $mathfrakB$ of $K(sqrtd)$. Thus also in this last case we have a contradiction.
So this also doesn't work. I also don't see how working with something like $K(sqrtalpha)/K$ should work as $mathcalO_K$ is not always equal to $mathbbZ[alpha]$: the index $[mathcalO_K:mathbbZ[alpha]]$ can be anything as far as I can tell. Thus I don't see how I can do calculations on explicit primes of a ring like $mathcalO_K[sqrtalpha]$.
Does anyone know the answer?
Edit: Okey, so after using Magma's command IsUnramified on $K(sqrtw)/K$ for various values of $k$ and $winmathbbZ[alpha]$, I found that for $k$ up to say $1000$ we have that $K(sqrtkalpha)/K$ is unramified. However I'm still a bit annoyed with this because a) I have no idea how to prove this (for the finite primes), and b) I have no idea how this seems like a logical thing to try. Surely I must be missing something?
algebraic-number-theory class-field-theory
algebraic-number-theory class-field-theory
edited Sep 11 at 0:41
asked Sep 10 at 18:19
Tim.ev
1,013620
1,013620
Here's an idea, which might help you. After some lengthy computation you can prove that $operatornamedisc mathbbZ[alpha]$ is an odd integer and thus $2 nmid [mathcal O_K: mathbbZ[alpha]$. This enables us to factor $2mathcal O_K$, as $(2,alpha - 1)(2,alpha^2 + alpha + 1)$. Now checking by computer for some lower values of $k$ we notice that $(2,alpha - 1)$ has even order in the ideal group of $K/mathbbQ$. However I don't see a way of proving this.
â Stefan4024
Sep 10 at 20:57
Thank you for the idea, but I don't see either how that could be done. I also checked with a computer but the orders seem to become immense as $k$ becomes large unfortunately. It was an exercise right after a chapter discussing the basic properties of ray class fields (and the Hilbert class field), so I really think the solution is to construct an unramified quadratic extension. Other exercises near it also use this angle to obtain information about the class group. Also: $mathrmdiscmathbbZ[alpha]=Delta(f)$ which is clearly odd, is that a lengthy computation?
â Tim.ev
Sep 10 at 21:17
I used the formula $operatornamedisc mathbbZ[alpha] = -(-1)^fracn(n+1)2N(f'(alpha))$
â Stefan4024
Sep 10 at 21:49
add a comment |Â
Here's an idea, which might help you. After some lengthy computation you can prove that $operatornamedisc mathbbZ[alpha]$ is an odd integer and thus $2 nmid [mathcal O_K: mathbbZ[alpha]$. This enables us to factor $2mathcal O_K$, as $(2,alpha - 1)(2,alpha^2 + alpha + 1)$. Now checking by computer for some lower values of $k$ we notice that $(2,alpha - 1)$ has even order in the ideal group of $K/mathbbQ$. However I don't see a way of proving this.
â Stefan4024
Sep 10 at 20:57
Thank you for the idea, but I don't see either how that could be done. I also checked with a computer but the orders seem to become immense as $k$ becomes large unfortunately. It was an exercise right after a chapter discussing the basic properties of ray class fields (and the Hilbert class field), so I really think the solution is to construct an unramified quadratic extension. Other exercises near it also use this angle to obtain information about the class group. Also: $mathrmdiscmathbbZ[alpha]=Delta(f)$ which is clearly odd, is that a lengthy computation?
â Tim.ev
Sep 10 at 21:17
I used the formula $operatornamedisc mathbbZ[alpha] = -(-1)^fracn(n+1)2N(f'(alpha))$
â Stefan4024
Sep 10 at 21:49
Here's an idea, which might help you. After some lengthy computation you can prove that $operatornamedisc mathbbZ[alpha]$ is an odd integer and thus $2 nmid [mathcal O_K: mathbbZ[alpha]$. This enables us to factor $2mathcal O_K$, as $(2,alpha - 1)(2,alpha^2 + alpha + 1)$. Now checking by computer for some lower values of $k$ we notice that $(2,alpha - 1)$ has even order in the ideal group of $K/mathbbQ$. However I don't see a way of proving this.
â Stefan4024
Sep 10 at 20:57
Here's an idea, which might help you. After some lengthy computation you can prove that $operatornamedisc mathbbZ[alpha]$ is an odd integer and thus $2 nmid [mathcal O_K: mathbbZ[alpha]$. This enables us to factor $2mathcal O_K$, as $(2,alpha - 1)(2,alpha^2 + alpha + 1)$. Now checking by computer for some lower values of $k$ we notice that $(2,alpha - 1)$ has even order in the ideal group of $K/mathbbQ$. However I don't see a way of proving this.
â Stefan4024
Sep 10 at 20:57
Thank you for the idea, but I don't see either how that could be done. I also checked with a computer but the orders seem to become immense as $k$ becomes large unfortunately. It was an exercise right after a chapter discussing the basic properties of ray class fields (and the Hilbert class field), so I really think the solution is to construct an unramified quadratic extension. Other exercises near it also use this angle to obtain information about the class group. Also: $mathrmdiscmathbbZ[alpha]=Delta(f)$ which is clearly odd, is that a lengthy computation?
â Tim.ev
Sep 10 at 21:17
Thank you for the idea, but I don't see either how that could be done. I also checked with a computer but the orders seem to become immense as $k$ becomes large unfortunately. It was an exercise right after a chapter discussing the basic properties of ray class fields (and the Hilbert class field), so I really think the solution is to construct an unramified quadratic extension. Other exercises near it also use this angle to obtain information about the class group. Also: $mathrmdiscmathbbZ[alpha]=Delta(f)$ which is clearly odd, is that a lengthy computation?
â Tim.ev
Sep 10 at 21:17
I used the formula $operatornamedisc mathbbZ[alpha] = -(-1)^fracn(n+1)2N(f'(alpha))$
â Stefan4024
Sep 10 at 21:49
I used the formula $operatornamedisc mathbbZ[alpha] = -(-1)^fracn(n+1)2N(f'(alpha))$
â Stefan4024
Sep 10 at 21:49
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
This is not a complete answer but it is a proof of your observation that $Bbb Q(alpha) subset Bbb Q(alpha,sqrtkalpha)$ is unramified.
Let $v$ be the valuation of a non-archimedean place of $Bbb Q(alpha)$.
Since $alpha^3 + 4kalpha - k = 0$, the two terms with lowest valuation must have the same valuation.
We have $v(4kalpha) = v(k) + v(4alpha) ge v(k)$, so $v(k)$ has to be that lowest valuation.
If $v(alpha^3) = v(k)$ then $v(k) = 3v(alpha)$ and so $v(kalpha) = 4v(alpha)$, which is even.
If $v(4kalpha) = v(k)$ then $v(alpha)=0$ and so $v(k)=v(alpha)=0$, and then $v(kalpha)$ is also even.
In fact, this shows that $alpha^3/k = 1-4alpha$ is a unit $u$ of the ring of integers of $Bbb Q(alpha)$ (you can indeed compute its inverse, $1+64k+4alpha+16alpha^2$), and then the extension $Bbb Q(alpha) subset Bbb Q(alpha,sqrtkalpha) = Bbb Q(alpha,sqrt u)$ can only be ramified at $2$ and infinity. In the real embedding of $Bbb Q(alpha)$, $alpha$ is positive, thus so is $u$, which only leaves $2$.
Since $1-4alpha$ is congruent to $1$ mod $4$, this extension is also obtained by adjoining $(1pm sqrt u)/2$, the roots of $X^2-X+alpha$. So the extension is unramified.
We have left to show that the extension is nontrivial, by showing that $u$ is actually not a square of another unit. Also, we haven't used yet the assumption that $k$ was odd.
Thank you! I don't see why your valuation computation proves that $1-4alpha$ is a unit. Aren't you only showing it is only a local unit? Anyway, it is a global unit. The extension is non-trivial: if it were trivial then $X^2-X+alpha$ has a root in $K$ and hence in $mathcalO_K$. Reducing mod the prime $mathfrakp_2=(2,alpha-1)$ (this uses that $k$ is odd!), we would get that $X^2+X+1$ has a root in $mathcalO_K/mathfrakp_2=mathbbF_2$. So I guess this completes the proof! I'l accept your anwser.
â Tim.ev
Sep 11 at 16:58
do you have an example of a number field or other Dedekind domain with a local unit that is not a global unit ?
â mercio
Sep 11 at 19:21
Well $2inmathbbZ$ becomes a unit in $mathbbZ_(3)$.
â Tim.ev
Sep 11 at 20:37
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
This is not a complete answer but it is a proof of your observation that $Bbb Q(alpha) subset Bbb Q(alpha,sqrtkalpha)$ is unramified.
Let $v$ be the valuation of a non-archimedean place of $Bbb Q(alpha)$.
Since $alpha^3 + 4kalpha - k = 0$, the two terms with lowest valuation must have the same valuation.
We have $v(4kalpha) = v(k) + v(4alpha) ge v(k)$, so $v(k)$ has to be that lowest valuation.
If $v(alpha^3) = v(k)$ then $v(k) = 3v(alpha)$ and so $v(kalpha) = 4v(alpha)$, which is even.
If $v(4kalpha) = v(k)$ then $v(alpha)=0$ and so $v(k)=v(alpha)=0$, and then $v(kalpha)$ is also even.
In fact, this shows that $alpha^3/k = 1-4alpha$ is a unit $u$ of the ring of integers of $Bbb Q(alpha)$ (you can indeed compute its inverse, $1+64k+4alpha+16alpha^2$), and then the extension $Bbb Q(alpha) subset Bbb Q(alpha,sqrtkalpha) = Bbb Q(alpha,sqrt u)$ can only be ramified at $2$ and infinity. In the real embedding of $Bbb Q(alpha)$, $alpha$ is positive, thus so is $u$, which only leaves $2$.
Since $1-4alpha$ is congruent to $1$ mod $4$, this extension is also obtained by adjoining $(1pm sqrt u)/2$, the roots of $X^2-X+alpha$. So the extension is unramified.
We have left to show that the extension is nontrivial, by showing that $u$ is actually not a square of another unit. Also, we haven't used yet the assumption that $k$ was odd.
Thank you! I don't see why your valuation computation proves that $1-4alpha$ is a unit. Aren't you only showing it is only a local unit? Anyway, it is a global unit. The extension is non-trivial: if it were trivial then $X^2-X+alpha$ has a root in $K$ and hence in $mathcalO_K$. Reducing mod the prime $mathfrakp_2=(2,alpha-1)$ (this uses that $k$ is odd!), we would get that $X^2+X+1$ has a root in $mathcalO_K/mathfrakp_2=mathbbF_2$. So I guess this completes the proof! I'l accept your anwser.
â Tim.ev
Sep 11 at 16:58
do you have an example of a number field or other Dedekind domain with a local unit that is not a global unit ?
â mercio
Sep 11 at 19:21
Well $2inmathbbZ$ becomes a unit in $mathbbZ_(3)$.
â Tim.ev
Sep 11 at 20:37
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
This is not a complete answer but it is a proof of your observation that $Bbb Q(alpha) subset Bbb Q(alpha,sqrtkalpha)$ is unramified.
Let $v$ be the valuation of a non-archimedean place of $Bbb Q(alpha)$.
Since $alpha^3 + 4kalpha - k = 0$, the two terms with lowest valuation must have the same valuation.
We have $v(4kalpha) = v(k) + v(4alpha) ge v(k)$, so $v(k)$ has to be that lowest valuation.
If $v(alpha^3) = v(k)$ then $v(k) = 3v(alpha)$ and so $v(kalpha) = 4v(alpha)$, which is even.
If $v(4kalpha) = v(k)$ then $v(alpha)=0$ and so $v(k)=v(alpha)=0$, and then $v(kalpha)$ is also even.
In fact, this shows that $alpha^3/k = 1-4alpha$ is a unit $u$ of the ring of integers of $Bbb Q(alpha)$ (you can indeed compute its inverse, $1+64k+4alpha+16alpha^2$), and then the extension $Bbb Q(alpha) subset Bbb Q(alpha,sqrtkalpha) = Bbb Q(alpha,sqrt u)$ can only be ramified at $2$ and infinity. In the real embedding of $Bbb Q(alpha)$, $alpha$ is positive, thus so is $u$, which only leaves $2$.
Since $1-4alpha$ is congruent to $1$ mod $4$, this extension is also obtained by adjoining $(1pm sqrt u)/2$, the roots of $X^2-X+alpha$. So the extension is unramified.
We have left to show that the extension is nontrivial, by showing that $u$ is actually not a square of another unit. Also, we haven't used yet the assumption that $k$ was odd.
Thank you! I don't see why your valuation computation proves that $1-4alpha$ is a unit. Aren't you only showing it is only a local unit? Anyway, it is a global unit. The extension is non-trivial: if it were trivial then $X^2-X+alpha$ has a root in $K$ and hence in $mathcalO_K$. Reducing mod the prime $mathfrakp_2=(2,alpha-1)$ (this uses that $k$ is odd!), we would get that $X^2+X+1$ has a root in $mathcalO_K/mathfrakp_2=mathbbF_2$. So I guess this completes the proof! I'l accept your anwser.
â Tim.ev
Sep 11 at 16:58
do you have an example of a number field or other Dedekind domain with a local unit that is not a global unit ?
â mercio
Sep 11 at 19:21
Well $2inmathbbZ$ becomes a unit in $mathbbZ_(3)$.
â Tim.ev
Sep 11 at 20:37
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
This is not a complete answer but it is a proof of your observation that $Bbb Q(alpha) subset Bbb Q(alpha,sqrtkalpha)$ is unramified.
Let $v$ be the valuation of a non-archimedean place of $Bbb Q(alpha)$.
Since $alpha^3 + 4kalpha - k = 0$, the two terms with lowest valuation must have the same valuation.
We have $v(4kalpha) = v(k) + v(4alpha) ge v(k)$, so $v(k)$ has to be that lowest valuation.
If $v(alpha^3) = v(k)$ then $v(k) = 3v(alpha)$ and so $v(kalpha) = 4v(alpha)$, which is even.
If $v(4kalpha) = v(k)$ then $v(alpha)=0$ and so $v(k)=v(alpha)=0$, and then $v(kalpha)$ is also even.
In fact, this shows that $alpha^3/k = 1-4alpha$ is a unit $u$ of the ring of integers of $Bbb Q(alpha)$ (you can indeed compute its inverse, $1+64k+4alpha+16alpha^2$), and then the extension $Bbb Q(alpha) subset Bbb Q(alpha,sqrtkalpha) = Bbb Q(alpha,sqrt u)$ can only be ramified at $2$ and infinity. In the real embedding of $Bbb Q(alpha)$, $alpha$ is positive, thus so is $u$, which only leaves $2$.
Since $1-4alpha$ is congruent to $1$ mod $4$, this extension is also obtained by adjoining $(1pm sqrt u)/2$, the roots of $X^2-X+alpha$. So the extension is unramified.
We have left to show that the extension is nontrivial, by showing that $u$ is actually not a square of another unit. Also, we haven't used yet the assumption that $k$ was odd.
This is not a complete answer but it is a proof of your observation that $Bbb Q(alpha) subset Bbb Q(alpha,sqrtkalpha)$ is unramified.
Let $v$ be the valuation of a non-archimedean place of $Bbb Q(alpha)$.
Since $alpha^3 + 4kalpha - k = 0$, the two terms with lowest valuation must have the same valuation.
We have $v(4kalpha) = v(k) + v(4alpha) ge v(k)$, so $v(k)$ has to be that lowest valuation.
If $v(alpha^3) = v(k)$ then $v(k) = 3v(alpha)$ and so $v(kalpha) = 4v(alpha)$, which is even.
If $v(4kalpha) = v(k)$ then $v(alpha)=0$ and so $v(k)=v(alpha)=0$, and then $v(kalpha)$ is also even.
In fact, this shows that $alpha^3/k = 1-4alpha$ is a unit $u$ of the ring of integers of $Bbb Q(alpha)$ (you can indeed compute its inverse, $1+64k+4alpha+16alpha^2$), and then the extension $Bbb Q(alpha) subset Bbb Q(alpha,sqrtkalpha) = Bbb Q(alpha,sqrt u)$ can only be ramified at $2$ and infinity. In the real embedding of $Bbb Q(alpha)$, $alpha$ is positive, thus so is $u$, which only leaves $2$.
Since $1-4alpha$ is congruent to $1$ mod $4$, this extension is also obtained by adjoining $(1pm sqrt u)/2$, the roots of $X^2-X+alpha$. So the extension is unramified.
We have left to show that the extension is nontrivial, by showing that $u$ is actually not a square of another unit. Also, we haven't used yet the assumption that $k$ was odd.
answered Sep 11 at 12:35
mercio
44.2k256108
44.2k256108
Thank you! I don't see why your valuation computation proves that $1-4alpha$ is a unit. Aren't you only showing it is only a local unit? Anyway, it is a global unit. The extension is non-trivial: if it were trivial then $X^2-X+alpha$ has a root in $K$ and hence in $mathcalO_K$. Reducing mod the prime $mathfrakp_2=(2,alpha-1)$ (this uses that $k$ is odd!), we would get that $X^2+X+1$ has a root in $mathcalO_K/mathfrakp_2=mathbbF_2$. So I guess this completes the proof! I'l accept your anwser.
â Tim.ev
Sep 11 at 16:58
do you have an example of a number field or other Dedekind domain with a local unit that is not a global unit ?
â mercio
Sep 11 at 19:21
Well $2inmathbbZ$ becomes a unit in $mathbbZ_(3)$.
â Tim.ev
Sep 11 at 20:37
add a comment |Â
Thank you! I don't see why your valuation computation proves that $1-4alpha$ is a unit. Aren't you only showing it is only a local unit? Anyway, it is a global unit. The extension is non-trivial: if it were trivial then $X^2-X+alpha$ has a root in $K$ and hence in $mathcalO_K$. Reducing mod the prime $mathfrakp_2=(2,alpha-1)$ (this uses that $k$ is odd!), we would get that $X^2+X+1$ has a root in $mathcalO_K/mathfrakp_2=mathbbF_2$. So I guess this completes the proof! I'l accept your anwser.
â Tim.ev
Sep 11 at 16:58
do you have an example of a number field or other Dedekind domain with a local unit that is not a global unit ?
â mercio
Sep 11 at 19:21
Well $2inmathbbZ$ becomes a unit in $mathbbZ_(3)$.
â Tim.ev
Sep 11 at 20:37
Thank you! I don't see why your valuation computation proves that $1-4alpha$ is a unit. Aren't you only showing it is only a local unit? Anyway, it is a global unit. The extension is non-trivial: if it were trivial then $X^2-X+alpha$ has a root in $K$ and hence in $mathcalO_K$. Reducing mod the prime $mathfrakp_2=(2,alpha-1)$ (this uses that $k$ is odd!), we would get that $X^2+X+1$ has a root in $mathcalO_K/mathfrakp_2=mathbbF_2$. So I guess this completes the proof! I'l accept your anwser.
â Tim.ev
Sep 11 at 16:58
Thank you! I don't see why your valuation computation proves that $1-4alpha$ is a unit. Aren't you only showing it is only a local unit? Anyway, it is a global unit. The extension is non-trivial: if it were trivial then $X^2-X+alpha$ has a root in $K$ and hence in $mathcalO_K$. Reducing mod the prime $mathfrakp_2=(2,alpha-1)$ (this uses that $k$ is odd!), we would get that $X^2+X+1$ has a root in $mathcalO_K/mathfrakp_2=mathbbF_2$. So I guess this completes the proof! I'l accept your anwser.
â Tim.ev
Sep 11 at 16:58
do you have an example of a number field or other Dedekind domain with a local unit that is not a global unit ?
â mercio
Sep 11 at 19:21
do you have an example of a number field or other Dedekind domain with a local unit that is not a global unit ?
â mercio
Sep 11 at 19:21
Well $2inmathbbZ$ becomes a unit in $mathbbZ_(3)$.
â Tim.ev
Sep 11 at 20:37
Well $2inmathbbZ$ becomes a unit in $mathbbZ_(3)$.
â Tim.ev
Sep 11 at 20:37
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2912193%2fif-alpha34k-alpha-k-0-with-k-geq-1-is-odd-then-mathbbq-alpha-has%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Here's an idea, which might help you. After some lengthy computation you can prove that $operatornamedisc mathbbZ[alpha]$ is an odd integer and thus $2 nmid [mathcal O_K: mathbbZ[alpha]$. This enables us to factor $2mathcal O_K$, as $(2,alpha - 1)(2,alpha^2 + alpha + 1)$. Now checking by computer for some lower values of $k$ we notice that $(2,alpha - 1)$ has even order in the ideal group of $K/mathbbQ$. However I don't see a way of proving this.
â Stefan4024
Sep 10 at 20:57
Thank you for the idea, but I don't see either how that could be done. I also checked with a computer but the orders seem to become immense as $k$ becomes large unfortunately. It was an exercise right after a chapter discussing the basic properties of ray class fields (and the Hilbert class field), so I really think the solution is to construct an unramified quadratic extension. Other exercises near it also use this angle to obtain information about the class group. Also: $mathrmdiscmathbbZ[alpha]=Delta(f)$ which is clearly odd, is that a lengthy computation?
â Tim.ev
Sep 10 at 21:17
I used the formula $operatornamedisc mathbbZ[alpha] = -(-1)^fracn(n+1)2N(f'(alpha))$
â Stefan4024
Sep 10 at 21:49