A topological proof of the Nullhomotopical Cauchy Integral Formula from the Circle Cauchy Integral Formula

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1












I believe there should be a simple topological proof of the Nullhomotopical Cauchy Integral Formula based only on the Cauchy Integral Formula over a Circle, but I can't quite finish the argument and would appreciate some help. (Hopefully I am on the right track.)



Nullhomotopical Cauchy Integral Formula: Let $UsubseteqmathbbC$ be an open and path-connected subset, let $z_0in U$, and let $gammasubseteq U$ be some, say, smooth loop such that $z_0notingamma$ and $gammasimeqrmpt.$ in $U$, where by abuse of notation $gamma$ stands for both the curve and its support.
If $f:UtomathbbC$ is a holomorphic function, then:
$$
f(z_0)operatornameind(gamma,z_0) = frac12pi ioint_gammafracf(z)z-z_0mathrmdz
$$
Attempted proof: I know that, being holomorphic, the 1-form
$$
omega:=fracf(z)z-z_0mathrmdz
$$
is $mathrmd$-closed, hence (its integral is) homotopy-invariant.
Since $gammasubseteq Usetminusz_0$ and $[gamma]=0$ in $pi_1(U)$, I believe that $[gamma]$ should induce a well-defined class $[gamma]'$ in $pi_1(Dsetminusz_0)$, where $D$ is a sufficiently small open disk around $z_0$ contained in $U$, but I don't quite see how to finish this line of reasoning rigorously, assuming it actually makes sense. Any help would be appreciated!










share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    I believe there should be a simple topological proof of the Nullhomotopical Cauchy Integral Formula based only on the Cauchy Integral Formula over a Circle, but I can't quite finish the argument and would appreciate some help. (Hopefully I am on the right track.)



    Nullhomotopical Cauchy Integral Formula: Let $UsubseteqmathbbC$ be an open and path-connected subset, let $z_0in U$, and let $gammasubseteq U$ be some, say, smooth loop such that $z_0notingamma$ and $gammasimeqrmpt.$ in $U$, where by abuse of notation $gamma$ stands for both the curve and its support.
    If $f:UtomathbbC$ is a holomorphic function, then:
    $$
    f(z_0)operatornameind(gamma,z_0) = frac12pi ioint_gammafracf(z)z-z_0mathrmdz
    $$
    Attempted proof: I know that, being holomorphic, the 1-form
    $$
    omega:=fracf(z)z-z_0mathrmdz
    $$
    is $mathrmd$-closed, hence (its integral is) homotopy-invariant.
    Since $gammasubseteq Usetminusz_0$ and $[gamma]=0$ in $pi_1(U)$, I believe that $[gamma]$ should induce a well-defined class $[gamma]'$ in $pi_1(Dsetminusz_0)$, where $D$ is a sufficiently small open disk around $z_0$ contained in $U$, but I don't quite see how to finish this line of reasoning rigorously, assuming it actually makes sense. Any help would be appreciated!










    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      I believe there should be a simple topological proof of the Nullhomotopical Cauchy Integral Formula based only on the Cauchy Integral Formula over a Circle, but I can't quite finish the argument and would appreciate some help. (Hopefully I am on the right track.)



      Nullhomotopical Cauchy Integral Formula: Let $UsubseteqmathbbC$ be an open and path-connected subset, let $z_0in U$, and let $gammasubseteq U$ be some, say, smooth loop such that $z_0notingamma$ and $gammasimeqrmpt.$ in $U$, where by abuse of notation $gamma$ stands for both the curve and its support.
      If $f:UtomathbbC$ is a holomorphic function, then:
      $$
      f(z_0)operatornameind(gamma,z_0) = frac12pi ioint_gammafracf(z)z-z_0mathrmdz
      $$
      Attempted proof: I know that, being holomorphic, the 1-form
      $$
      omega:=fracf(z)z-z_0mathrmdz
      $$
      is $mathrmd$-closed, hence (its integral is) homotopy-invariant.
      Since $gammasubseteq Usetminusz_0$ and $[gamma]=0$ in $pi_1(U)$, I believe that $[gamma]$ should induce a well-defined class $[gamma]'$ in $pi_1(Dsetminusz_0)$, where $D$ is a sufficiently small open disk around $z_0$ contained in $U$, but I don't quite see how to finish this line of reasoning rigorously, assuming it actually makes sense. Any help would be appreciated!










      share|cite|improve this question













      I believe there should be a simple topological proof of the Nullhomotopical Cauchy Integral Formula based only on the Cauchy Integral Formula over a Circle, but I can't quite finish the argument and would appreciate some help. (Hopefully I am on the right track.)



      Nullhomotopical Cauchy Integral Formula: Let $UsubseteqmathbbC$ be an open and path-connected subset, let $z_0in U$, and let $gammasubseteq U$ be some, say, smooth loop such that $z_0notingamma$ and $gammasimeqrmpt.$ in $U$, where by abuse of notation $gamma$ stands for both the curve and its support.
      If $f:UtomathbbC$ is a holomorphic function, then:
      $$
      f(z_0)operatornameind(gamma,z_0) = frac12pi ioint_gammafracf(z)z-z_0mathrmdz
      $$
      Attempted proof: I know that, being holomorphic, the 1-form
      $$
      omega:=fracf(z)z-z_0mathrmdz
      $$
      is $mathrmd$-closed, hence (its integral is) homotopy-invariant.
      Since $gammasubseteq Usetminusz_0$ and $[gamma]=0$ in $pi_1(U)$, I believe that $[gamma]$ should induce a well-defined class $[gamma]'$ in $pi_1(Dsetminusz_0)$, where $D$ is a sufficiently small open disk around $z_0$ contained in $U$, but I don't quite see how to finish this line of reasoning rigorously, assuming it actually makes sense. Any help would be appreciated!







      complex-analysis algebraic-topology






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Sep 10 at 21:02









      M.G.

      566415




      566415

























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2912358%2fa-topological-proof-of-the-nullhomotopical-cauchy-integral-formula-from-the-circ%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest



































          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2912358%2fa-topological-proof-of-the-nullhomotopical-cauchy-integral-formula-from-the-circ%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

          Is there any way to eliminate the singular point to solve this integral by hand or by approximations?

          Strongly p-embedded subgroups and p-Sylow subgroups.