Choosing signs in inverse trigonometric composing
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I understood why he chose the positive square root in the sin but why the tan is also positive ? Isn't the tan positive and negative in this interval ?
trigonometry
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I understood why he chose the positive square root in the sin but why the tan is also positive ? Isn't the tan positive and negative in this interval ?
trigonometry
1
I think you misunderstood the comment. It said choose the + sign for the sin. For the tan, the sign depends on the sign of x. For negative x where the angle would be in the interval $[fracpi2,pi]$ the tan would be negative.
â herb steinberg
Sep 10 at 21:27
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I understood why he chose the positive square root in the sin but why the tan is also positive ? Isn't the tan positive and negative in this interval ?
trigonometry
I understood why he chose the positive square root in the sin but why the tan is also positive ? Isn't the tan positive and negative in this interval ?
trigonometry
trigonometry
asked Sep 10 at 21:13
Ahmed M. Elsonbaty
474
474
1
I think you misunderstood the comment. It said choose the + sign for the sin. For the tan, the sign depends on the sign of x. For negative x where the angle would be in the interval $[fracpi2,pi]$ the tan would be negative.
â herb steinberg
Sep 10 at 21:27
add a comment |Â
1
I think you misunderstood the comment. It said choose the + sign for the sin. For the tan, the sign depends on the sign of x. For negative x where the angle would be in the interval $[fracpi2,pi]$ the tan would be negative.
â herb steinberg
Sep 10 at 21:27
1
1
I think you misunderstood the comment. It said choose the + sign for the sin. For the tan, the sign depends on the sign of x. For negative x where the angle would be in the interval $[fracpi2,pi]$ the tan would be negative.
â herb steinberg
Sep 10 at 21:27
I think you misunderstood the comment. It said choose the + sign for the sin. For the tan, the sign depends on the sign of x. For negative x where the angle would be in the interval $[fracpi2,pi]$ the tan would be negative.
â herb steinberg
Sep 10 at 21:27
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
Note that when $-1 <x < 0$, $$tan(cos^-1(x)) = fracsqrt1-x^2x < 0.$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Note that, for $thetain[0,pi]$ and $thetanepi/2$,
$$
tantheta=fracsinthetacostheta
$$
Since you have already established that $sinarccos x=sqrt1-x^2$, you can directly conclude that
$$
tanarccos x=fracsqrt1-x^2x
$$
because $cosarccos x=x$ by definition.
Using $pm$ is misleading, in my opinion.
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
Note that when $-1 <x < 0$, $$tan(cos^-1(x)) = fracsqrt1-x^2x < 0.$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
Note that when $-1 <x < 0$, $$tan(cos^-1(x)) = fracsqrt1-x^2x < 0.$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
Note that when $-1 <x < 0$, $$tan(cos^-1(x)) = fracsqrt1-x^2x < 0.$$
Note that when $-1 <x < 0$, $$tan(cos^-1(x)) = fracsqrt1-x^2x < 0.$$
answered Sep 10 at 21:23
Math Lover
12.9k31333
12.9k31333
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Note that, for $thetain[0,pi]$ and $thetanepi/2$,
$$
tantheta=fracsinthetacostheta
$$
Since you have already established that $sinarccos x=sqrt1-x^2$, you can directly conclude that
$$
tanarccos x=fracsqrt1-x^2x
$$
because $cosarccos x=x$ by definition.
Using $pm$ is misleading, in my opinion.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Note that, for $thetain[0,pi]$ and $thetanepi/2$,
$$
tantheta=fracsinthetacostheta
$$
Since you have already established that $sinarccos x=sqrt1-x^2$, you can directly conclude that
$$
tanarccos x=fracsqrt1-x^2x
$$
because $cosarccos x=x$ by definition.
Using $pm$ is misleading, in my opinion.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Note that, for $thetain[0,pi]$ and $thetanepi/2$,
$$
tantheta=fracsinthetacostheta
$$
Since you have already established that $sinarccos x=sqrt1-x^2$, you can directly conclude that
$$
tanarccos x=fracsqrt1-x^2x
$$
because $cosarccos x=x$ by definition.
Using $pm$ is misleading, in my opinion.
Note that, for $thetain[0,pi]$ and $thetanepi/2$,
$$
tantheta=fracsinthetacostheta
$$
Since you have already established that $sinarccos x=sqrt1-x^2$, you can directly conclude that
$$
tanarccos x=fracsqrt1-x^2x
$$
because $cosarccos x=x$ by definition.
Using $pm$ is misleading, in my opinion.
answered Sep 10 at 21:50
egreg
168k1281190
168k1281190
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2912376%2fchoosing-signs-in-inverse-trigonometric-composing%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
1
I think you misunderstood the comment. It said choose the + sign for the sin. For the tan, the sign depends on the sign of x. For negative x where the angle would be in the interval $[fracpi2,pi]$ the tan would be negative.
â herb steinberg
Sep 10 at 21:27