Calculating power without using a calculator, for example $1.05^10$
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
How to find (or estimate) $1.0003^365$ without using a calculator? Do we have any fast algorithm for cases where base is slightly more than one? Say up to $1.1$ with tick $0.05$.
exponentiation mental-arithmetic
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
How to find (or estimate) $1.0003^365$ without using a calculator? Do we have any fast algorithm for cases where base is slightly more than one? Say up to $1.1$ with tick $0.05$.
exponentiation mental-arithmetic
The answer is 1,628894627 and I do not think that there are many easy ways to arrive to this number without using a calculator.
â Jimmy R.
Dec 13 '14 at 17:57
2
Stretches over for log tables:105
gives0212
. Then turn page to antilogs.212
gives1629
. So the answer is about $1.629$ since $log_10(1.05) approx 0.0212$, $10log_10(1.05) approx 0.212$, $1.05^10 = 10^10log_10(1.05)approx 1.629$
â Henry
Dec 13 '14 at 18:09
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
How to find (or estimate) $1.0003^365$ without using a calculator? Do we have any fast algorithm for cases where base is slightly more than one? Say up to $1.1$ with tick $0.05$.
exponentiation mental-arithmetic
How to find (or estimate) $1.0003^365$ without using a calculator? Do we have any fast algorithm for cases where base is slightly more than one? Say up to $1.1$ with tick $0.05$.
exponentiation mental-arithmetic
exponentiation mental-arithmetic
edited Sep 10 at 18:19
Communityâ¦
1
1
asked Dec 13 '14 at 17:53
Pavel Morozkin
18115
18115
The answer is 1,628894627 and I do not think that there are many easy ways to arrive to this number without using a calculator.
â Jimmy R.
Dec 13 '14 at 17:57
2
Stretches over for log tables:105
gives0212
. Then turn page to antilogs.212
gives1629
. So the answer is about $1.629$ since $log_10(1.05) approx 0.0212$, $10log_10(1.05) approx 0.212$, $1.05^10 = 10^10log_10(1.05)approx 1.629$
â Henry
Dec 13 '14 at 18:09
add a comment |Â
The answer is 1,628894627 and I do not think that there are many easy ways to arrive to this number without using a calculator.
â Jimmy R.
Dec 13 '14 at 17:57
2
Stretches over for log tables:105
gives0212
. Then turn page to antilogs.212
gives1629
. So the answer is about $1.629$ since $log_10(1.05) approx 0.0212$, $10log_10(1.05) approx 0.212$, $1.05^10 = 10^10log_10(1.05)approx 1.629$
â Henry
Dec 13 '14 at 18:09
The answer is 1,628894627 and I do not think that there are many easy ways to arrive to this number without using a calculator.
â Jimmy R.
Dec 13 '14 at 17:57
The answer is 1,628894627 and I do not think that there are many easy ways to arrive to this number without using a calculator.
â Jimmy R.
Dec 13 '14 at 17:57
2
2
Stretches over for log tables:
105
gives 0212
. Then turn page to antilogs .212
gives 1629
. So the answer is about $1.629$ since $log_10(1.05) approx 0.0212$, $10log_10(1.05) approx 0.212$, $1.05^10 = 10^10log_10(1.05)approx 1.629$â Henry
Dec 13 '14 at 18:09
Stretches over for log tables:
105
gives 0212
. Then turn page to antilogs .212
gives 1629
. So the answer is about $1.629$ since $log_10(1.05) approx 0.0212$, $10log_10(1.05) approx 0.212$, $1.05^10 = 10^10log_10(1.05)approx 1.629$â Henry
Dec 13 '14 at 18:09
add a comment |Â
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
up vote
8
down vote
accepted
You could try the binomial expansion of $(1+0.05)^10$ and stop calculating terms after they become small enough to not affect your required degree of accuracy
Here's an easy way to work out terms of the binomial expansion with pencil and paper: headinside.blogspot.com/2015/03/â¦
â Grey Matters
Mar 10 '15 at 3:23
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
$$(1+x)^napprox 1+nxquad(xll1)$$
$$^*(1+x)^n=1+nx+fracn(n-1)2!x^2+fracn(n-1)(n-2)3!x^3+...$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Well binomial theorem with some basic algebraic manipulations,I find it easier to play with integers than decimals.
$$1.05^10=frac105^10100^10=frac5^10cdot21^105^10cdot20^10=frac(20+1)^1020^10=1+frac10cdot20^9+45cdot 20^8+10choose 320^7+cdots+120^10=1+1/2+frac4520^2+frac12020^3+cdots+frac120^10=1.5+0.1125+0.015+cdots+frac120^10approx 1.6275$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
First, learn how to work with base-10 logs in your head, including converting them back and forth. Here's a simple video that will teach you how to do this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5rgTPu8JcE
Next, realize that $e$ can be used to approximate such problems. A good understanding of $e$ can be found here: http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-intuitive-guide-to-exponential-functions-e/
Finally, learn to take equations in the form of $e^x$ and convert them into equivalent problems of the form $10^y$: http://headinside.blogspot.com/2014/03/calculate-powers-of-e-in-your-head.html
To actually work through the problem, multiply the interest (0.05 in your example) times the power (10 in your example), and start by raising $e$ to that power. 0.05 Ã 10 = 0.50, so we're looking at roughly $e^0.50$.
We're going to convert this into the form $10^y$, but the conversion method works better with integers, so we should the equivalent of $e^50$, work out $y$ for $10^y$, and then move the decimal place of $y$ two spaces to the left to compensate.
Using the method from the calculate powers of e tutorial above, $e^50$â$10^21.715$, so $e^0.50$â$10^0.21715$. Now, we just have to work out what the base-10 antilogarithm for 0.21715.
As explained in the youtube link above, a 0.041 difference between logarithms corresponds to a roughly 10% change in the equivalent decimal. 0.217 + 0.041 + 0.041 = 0.299, which is quite close to the base-10 log of 2. Two differences of 0.041 mean two differences of 10%. In short, the answer should be roughly 20% less than 2, which is 1.6.
OK, this probably isn't a quick a method as you may like, but it does return a decent estimate.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
You can use successive squaring.
$$x^10 = x^2(x^4)^2 = x^2((x^2)^2)^2$$
so first calculate $x^2$, then save it for later, calculate square two more times and then multiply with the $x^2$ you saved. This will make smaller the number of multiplications you need to do. From 9 down to 4. Will be much more impressive for large powers and powers that are a multiple of two. For example $x^1024$ will require no more than 10 multiplications!
add a comment |Â
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
8
down vote
accepted
You could try the binomial expansion of $(1+0.05)^10$ and stop calculating terms after they become small enough to not affect your required degree of accuracy
Here's an easy way to work out terms of the binomial expansion with pencil and paper: headinside.blogspot.com/2015/03/â¦
â Grey Matters
Mar 10 '15 at 3:23
add a comment |Â
up vote
8
down vote
accepted
You could try the binomial expansion of $(1+0.05)^10$ and stop calculating terms after they become small enough to not affect your required degree of accuracy
Here's an easy way to work out terms of the binomial expansion with pencil and paper: headinside.blogspot.com/2015/03/â¦
â Grey Matters
Mar 10 '15 at 3:23
add a comment |Â
up vote
8
down vote
accepted
up vote
8
down vote
accepted
You could try the binomial expansion of $(1+0.05)^10$ and stop calculating terms after they become small enough to not affect your required degree of accuracy
You could try the binomial expansion of $(1+0.05)^10$ and stop calculating terms after they become small enough to not affect your required degree of accuracy
edited Dec 13 '14 at 18:13
dustin
6,65592966
6,65592966
answered Dec 13 '14 at 18:12
MidnightMirror80
984
984
Here's an easy way to work out terms of the binomial expansion with pencil and paper: headinside.blogspot.com/2015/03/â¦
â Grey Matters
Mar 10 '15 at 3:23
add a comment |Â
Here's an easy way to work out terms of the binomial expansion with pencil and paper: headinside.blogspot.com/2015/03/â¦
â Grey Matters
Mar 10 '15 at 3:23
Here's an easy way to work out terms of the binomial expansion with pencil and paper: headinside.blogspot.com/2015/03/â¦
â Grey Matters
Mar 10 '15 at 3:23
Here's an easy way to work out terms of the binomial expansion with pencil and paper: headinside.blogspot.com/2015/03/â¦
â Grey Matters
Mar 10 '15 at 3:23
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
$$(1+x)^napprox 1+nxquad(xll1)$$
$$^*(1+x)^n=1+nx+fracn(n-1)2!x^2+fracn(n-1)(n-2)3!x^3+...$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
$$(1+x)^napprox 1+nxquad(xll1)$$
$$^*(1+x)^n=1+nx+fracn(n-1)2!x^2+fracn(n-1)(n-2)3!x^3+...$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
$$(1+x)^napprox 1+nxquad(xll1)$$
$$^*(1+x)^n=1+nx+fracn(n-1)2!x^2+fracn(n-1)(n-2)3!x^3+...$$
$$(1+x)^napprox 1+nxquad(xll1)$$
$$^*(1+x)^n=1+nx+fracn(n-1)2!x^2+fracn(n-1)(n-2)3!x^3+...$$
answered Dec 13 '14 at 18:25
RE60K
13.9k22053
13.9k22053
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Well binomial theorem with some basic algebraic manipulations,I find it easier to play with integers than decimals.
$$1.05^10=frac105^10100^10=frac5^10cdot21^105^10cdot20^10=frac(20+1)^1020^10=1+frac10cdot20^9+45cdot 20^8+10choose 320^7+cdots+120^10=1+1/2+frac4520^2+frac12020^3+cdots+frac120^10=1.5+0.1125+0.015+cdots+frac120^10approx 1.6275$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Well binomial theorem with some basic algebraic manipulations,I find it easier to play with integers than decimals.
$$1.05^10=frac105^10100^10=frac5^10cdot21^105^10cdot20^10=frac(20+1)^1020^10=1+frac10cdot20^9+45cdot 20^8+10choose 320^7+cdots+120^10=1+1/2+frac4520^2+frac12020^3+cdots+frac120^10=1.5+0.1125+0.015+cdots+frac120^10approx 1.6275$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Well binomial theorem with some basic algebraic manipulations,I find it easier to play with integers than decimals.
$$1.05^10=frac105^10100^10=frac5^10cdot21^105^10cdot20^10=frac(20+1)^1020^10=1+frac10cdot20^9+45cdot 20^8+10choose 320^7+cdots+120^10=1+1/2+frac4520^2+frac12020^3+cdots+frac120^10=1.5+0.1125+0.015+cdots+frac120^10approx 1.6275$$
Well binomial theorem with some basic algebraic manipulations,I find it easier to play with integers than decimals.
$$1.05^10=frac105^10100^10=frac5^10cdot21^105^10cdot20^10=frac(20+1)^1020^10=1+frac10cdot20^9+45cdot 20^8+10choose 320^7+cdots+120^10=1+1/2+frac4520^2+frac12020^3+cdots+frac120^10=1.5+0.1125+0.015+cdots+frac120^10approx 1.6275$$
answered Dec 13 '14 at 21:36
kingW3
10.8k72553
10.8k72553
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
First, learn how to work with base-10 logs in your head, including converting them back and forth. Here's a simple video that will teach you how to do this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5rgTPu8JcE
Next, realize that $e$ can be used to approximate such problems. A good understanding of $e$ can be found here: http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-intuitive-guide-to-exponential-functions-e/
Finally, learn to take equations in the form of $e^x$ and convert them into equivalent problems of the form $10^y$: http://headinside.blogspot.com/2014/03/calculate-powers-of-e-in-your-head.html
To actually work through the problem, multiply the interest (0.05 in your example) times the power (10 in your example), and start by raising $e$ to that power. 0.05 Ã 10 = 0.50, so we're looking at roughly $e^0.50$.
We're going to convert this into the form $10^y$, but the conversion method works better with integers, so we should the equivalent of $e^50$, work out $y$ for $10^y$, and then move the decimal place of $y$ two spaces to the left to compensate.
Using the method from the calculate powers of e tutorial above, $e^50$â$10^21.715$, so $e^0.50$â$10^0.21715$. Now, we just have to work out what the base-10 antilogarithm for 0.21715.
As explained in the youtube link above, a 0.041 difference between logarithms corresponds to a roughly 10% change in the equivalent decimal. 0.217 + 0.041 + 0.041 = 0.299, which is quite close to the base-10 log of 2. Two differences of 0.041 mean two differences of 10%. In short, the answer should be roughly 20% less than 2, which is 1.6.
OK, this probably isn't a quick a method as you may like, but it does return a decent estimate.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
First, learn how to work with base-10 logs in your head, including converting them back and forth. Here's a simple video that will teach you how to do this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5rgTPu8JcE
Next, realize that $e$ can be used to approximate such problems. A good understanding of $e$ can be found here: http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-intuitive-guide-to-exponential-functions-e/
Finally, learn to take equations in the form of $e^x$ and convert them into equivalent problems of the form $10^y$: http://headinside.blogspot.com/2014/03/calculate-powers-of-e-in-your-head.html
To actually work through the problem, multiply the interest (0.05 in your example) times the power (10 in your example), and start by raising $e$ to that power. 0.05 Ã 10 = 0.50, so we're looking at roughly $e^0.50$.
We're going to convert this into the form $10^y$, but the conversion method works better with integers, so we should the equivalent of $e^50$, work out $y$ for $10^y$, and then move the decimal place of $y$ two spaces to the left to compensate.
Using the method from the calculate powers of e tutorial above, $e^50$â$10^21.715$, so $e^0.50$â$10^0.21715$. Now, we just have to work out what the base-10 antilogarithm for 0.21715.
As explained in the youtube link above, a 0.041 difference between logarithms corresponds to a roughly 10% change in the equivalent decimal. 0.217 + 0.041 + 0.041 = 0.299, which is quite close to the base-10 log of 2. Two differences of 0.041 mean two differences of 10%. In short, the answer should be roughly 20% less than 2, which is 1.6.
OK, this probably isn't a quick a method as you may like, but it does return a decent estimate.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
First, learn how to work with base-10 logs in your head, including converting them back and forth. Here's a simple video that will teach you how to do this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5rgTPu8JcE
Next, realize that $e$ can be used to approximate such problems. A good understanding of $e$ can be found here: http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-intuitive-guide-to-exponential-functions-e/
Finally, learn to take equations in the form of $e^x$ and convert them into equivalent problems of the form $10^y$: http://headinside.blogspot.com/2014/03/calculate-powers-of-e-in-your-head.html
To actually work through the problem, multiply the interest (0.05 in your example) times the power (10 in your example), and start by raising $e$ to that power. 0.05 Ã 10 = 0.50, so we're looking at roughly $e^0.50$.
We're going to convert this into the form $10^y$, but the conversion method works better with integers, so we should the equivalent of $e^50$, work out $y$ for $10^y$, and then move the decimal place of $y$ two spaces to the left to compensate.
Using the method from the calculate powers of e tutorial above, $e^50$â$10^21.715$, so $e^0.50$â$10^0.21715$. Now, we just have to work out what the base-10 antilogarithm for 0.21715.
As explained in the youtube link above, a 0.041 difference between logarithms corresponds to a roughly 10% change in the equivalent decimal. 0.217 + 0.041 + 0.041 = 0.299, which is quite close to the base-10 log of 2. Two differences of 0.041 mean two differences of 10%. In short, the answer should be roughly 20% less than 2, which is 1.6.
OK, this probably isn't a quick a method as you may like, but it does return a decent estimate.
First, learn how to work with base-10 logs in your head, including converting them back and forth. Here's a simple video that will teach you how to do this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5rgTPu8JcE
Next, realize that $e$ can be used to approximate such problems. A good understanding of $e$ can be found here: http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-intuitive-guide-to-exponential-functions-e/
Finally, learn to take equations in the form of $e^x$ and convert them into equivalent problems of the form $10^y$: http://headinside.blogspot.com/2014/03/calculate-powers-of-e-in-your-head.html
To actually work through the problem, multiply the interest (0.05 in your example) times the power (10 in your example), and start by raising $e$ to that power. 0.05 Ã 10 = 0.50, so we're looking at roughly $e^0.50$.
We're going to convert this into the form $10^y$, but the conversion method works better with integers, so we should the equivalent of $e^50$, work out $y$ for $10^y$, and then move the decimal place of $y$ two spaces to the left to compensate.
Using the method from the calculate powers of e tutorial above, $e^50$â$10^21.715$, so $e^0.50$â$10^0.21715$. Now, we just have to work out what the base-10 antilogarithm for 0.21715.
As explained in the youtube link above, a 0.041 difference between logarithms corresponds to a roughly 10% change in the equivalent decimal. 0.217 + 0.041 + 0.041 = 0.299, which is quite close to the base-10 log of 2. Two differences of 0.041 mean two differences of 10%. In short, the answer should be roughly 20% less than 2, which is 1.6.
OK, this probably isn't a quick a method as you may like, but it does return a decent estimate.
answered Dec 23 '14 at 22:00
Grey Matters
76736
76736
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
You can use successive squaring.
$$x^10 = x^2(x^4)^2 = x^2((x^2)^2)^2$$
so first calculate $x^2$, then save it for later, calculate square two more times and then multiply with the $x^2$ you saved. This will make smaller the number of multiplications you need to do. From 9 down to 4. Will be much more impressive for large powers and powers that are a multiple of two. For example $x^1024$ will require no more than 10 multiplications!
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
You can use successive squaring.
$$x^10 = x^2(x^4)^2 = x^2((x^2)^2)^2$$
so first calculate $x^2$, then save it for later, calculate square two more times and then multiply with the $x^2$ you saved. This will make smaller the number of multiplications you need to do. From 9 down to 4. Will be much more impressive for large powers and powers that are a multiple of two. For example $x^1024$ will require no more than 10 multiplications!
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
You can use successive squaring.
$$x^10 = x^2(x^4)^2 = x^2((x^2)^2)^2$$
so first calculate $x^2$, then save it for later, calculate square two more times and then multiply with the $x^2$ you saved. This will make smaller the number of multiplications you need to do. From 9 down to 4. Will be much more impressive for large powers and powers that are a multiple of two. For example $x^1024$ will require no more than 10 multiplications!
You can use successive squaring.
$$x^10 = x^2(x^4)^2 = x^2((x^2)^2)^2$$
so first calculate $x^2$, then save it for later, calculate square two more times and then multiply with the $x^2$ you saved. This will make smaller the number of multiplications you need to do. From 9 down to 4. Will be much more impressive for large powers and powers that are a multiple of two. For example $x^1024$ will require no more than 10 multiplications!
answered Jul 22 '16 at 19:25
mathreadler
13.9k72058
13.9k72058
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1066550%2fcalculating-power-without-using-a-calculator-for-example-1-0510%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
The answer is 1,628894627 and I do not think that there are many easy ways to arrive to this number without using a calculator.
â Jimmy R.
Dec 13 '14 at 17:57
2
Stretches over for log tables:
105
gives0212
. Then turn page to antilogs.212
gives1629
. So the answer is about $1.629$ since $log_10(1.05) approx 0.0212$, $10log_10(1.05) approx 0.212$, $1.05^10 = 10^10log_10(1.05)approx 1.629$â Henry
Dec 13 '14 at 18:09