Oscillatory Cancellation of Integral
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Under which conditions for a real function $f(x)$ is
$$
left| int_1^x left fleft(fracxwright) - fleft(leftlfloor fracxw rightrfloorright) right cosleft(wright) , rm dw right|
$$
finite, as $xrightarrow infty$.
The point here is that the $cos $ function is present for cancellation of most parts. I was thinking to expand
$$
fleft(fracxwright) = fleft(leftlfloorfracxwrightrfloorright) + f'left(leftlfloorfracxwrightrfloorright) underbraceleft(fracxw - leftlfloorfracxwrightrfloor right)_cal O(1) + cal Oleft( left(fracxw - leftlfloorfracxwrightrfloor right)^2 right)
$$
so that $|f'(x)|$ must at least be bounded as $xrightarrow infty$.
But is it true that for any $cal O(1)$ function $g(x)$
$$
left| int_1^x g(w) cosleft(wright) , rm dw right|
$$
is finite as $xrightarrow infty$? I mean it is obviously not true if I choose $g(x)=cos(x)$, so there must be some restrictions as in $cos(x)$ and $g(x)$ are not correlated.
I hope it is clear what I want. I was trying to make it somewhat rigorous.
real-analysis oscillatory-integral
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Under which conditions for a real function $f(x)$ is
$$
left| int_1^x left fleft(fracxwright) - fleft(leftlfloor fracxw rightrfloorright) right cosleft(wright) , rm dw right|
$$
finite, as $xrightarrow infty$.
The point here is that the $cos $ function is present for cancellation of most parts. I was thinking to expand
$$
fleft(fracxwright) = fleft(leftlfloorfracxwrightrfloorright) + f'left(leftlfloorfracxwrightrfloorright) underbraceleft(fracxw - leftlfloorfracxwrightrfloor right)_cal O(1) + cal Oleft( left(fracxw - leftlfloorfracxwrightrfloor right)^2 right)
$$
so that $|f'(x)|$ must at least be bounded as $xrightarrow infty$.
But is it true that for any $cal O(1)$ function $g(x)$
$$
left| int_1^x g(w) cosleft(wright) , rm dw right|
$$
is finite as $xrightarrow infty$? I mean it is obviously not true if I choose $g(x)=cos(x)$, so there must be some restrictions as in $cos(x)$ and $g(x)$ are not correlated.
I hope it is clear what I want. I was trying to make it somewhat rigorous.
real-analysis oscillatory-integral
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Under which conditions for a real function $f(x)$ is
$$
left| int_1^x left fleft(fracxwright) - fleft(leftlfloor fracxw rightrfloorright) right cosleft(wright) , rm dw right|
$$
finite, as $xrightarrow infty$.
The point here is that the $cos $ function is present for cancellation of most parts. I was thinking to expand
$$
fleft(fracxwright) = fleft(leftlfloorfracxwrightrfloorright) + f'left(leftlfloorfracxwrightrfloorright) underbraceleft(fracxw - leftlfloorfracxwrightrfloor right)_cal O(1) + cal Oleft( left(fracxw - leftlfloorfracxwrightrfloor right)^2 right)
$$
so that $|f'(x)|$ must at least be bounded as $xrightarrow infty$.
But is it true that for any $cal O(1)$ function $g(x)$
$$
left| int_1^x g(w) cosleft(wright) , rm dw right|
$$
is finite as $xrightarrow infty$? I mean it is obviously not true if I choose $g(x)=cos(x)$, so there must be some restrictions as in $cos(x)$ and $g(x)$ are not correlated.
I hope it is clear what I want. I was trying to make it somewhat rigorous.
real-analysis oscillatory-integral
Under which conditions for a real function $f(x)$ is
$$
left| int_1^x left fleft(fracxwright) - fleft(leftlfloor fracxw rightrfloorright) right cosleft(wright) , rm dw right|
$$
finite, as $xrightarrow infty$.
The point here is that the $cos $ function is present for cancellation of most parts. I was thinking to expand
$$
fleft(fracxwright) = fleft(leftlfloorfracxwrightrfloorright) + f'left(leftlfloorfracxwrightrfloorright) underbraceleft(fracxw - leftlfloorfracxwrightrfloor right)_cal O(1) + cal Oleft( left(fracxw - leftlfloorfracxwrightrfloor right)^2 right)
$$
so that $|f'(x)|$ must at least be bounded as $xrightarrow infty$.
But is it true that for any $cal O(1)$ function $g(x)$
$$
left| int_1^x g(w) cosleft(wright) , rm dw right|
$$
is finite as $xrightarrow infty$? I mean it is obviously not true if I choose $g(x)=cos(x)$, so there must be some restrictions as in $cos(x)$ and $g(x)$ are not correlated.
I hope it is clear what I want. I was trying to make it somewhat rigorous.
real-analysis oscillatory-integral
real-analysis oscillatory-integral
edited Sep 10 at 21:20
asked Sep 10 at 21:08
Diger
757310
757310
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2912367%2foscillatory-cancellation-of-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password