Oscillatory Cancellation of Integral

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1












Under which conditions for a real function $f(x)$ is
$$
left| int_1^x left fleft(fracxwright) - fleft(leftlfloor fracxw rightrfloorright) right cosleft(wright) , rm dw right|
$$
finite, as $xrightarrow infty$.



The point here is that the $cos $ function is present for cancellation of most parts. I was thinking to expand
$$
fleft(fracxwright) = fleft(leftlfloorfracxwrightrfloorright) + f'left(leftlfloorfracxwrightrfloorright) underbraceleft(fracxw - leftlfloorfracxwrightrfloor right)_cal O(1) + cal Oleft( left(fracxw - leftlfloorfracxwrightrfloor right)^2 right)
$$
so that $|f'(x)|$ must at least be bounded as $xrightarrow infty$.



But is it true that for any $cal O(1)$ function $g(x)$
$$
left| int_1^x g(w) cosleft(wright) , rm dw right|
$$
is finite as $xrightarrow infty$? I mean it is obviously not true if I choose $g(x)=cos(x)$, so there must be some restrictions as in $cos(x)$ and $g(x)$ are not correlated.



I hope it is clear what I want. I was trying to make it somewhat rigorous.










share|cite|improve this question



























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    Under which conditions for a real function $f(x)$ is
    $$
    left| int_1^x left fleft(fracxwright) - fleft(leftlfloor fracxw rightrfloorright) right cosleft(wright) , rm dw right|
    $$
    finite, as $xrightarrow infty$.



    The point here is that the $cos $ function is present for cancellation of most parts. I was thinking to expand
    $$
    fleft(fracxwright) = fleft(leftlfloorfracxwrightrfloorright) + f'left(leftlfloorfracxwrightrfloorright) underbraceleft(fracxw - leftlfloorfracxwrightrfloor right)_cal O(1) + cal Oleft( left(fracxw - leftlfloorfracxwrightrfloor right)^2 right)
    $$
    so that $|f'(x)|$ must at least be bounded as $xrightarrow infty$.



    But is it true that for any $cal O(1)$ function $g(x)$
    $$
    left| int_1^x g(w) cosleft(wright) , rm dw right|
    $$
    is finite as $xrightarrow infty$? I mean it is obviously not true if I choose $g(x)=cos(x)$, so there must be some restrictions as in $cos(x)$ and $g(x)$ are not correlated.



    I hope it is clear what I want. I was trying to make it somewhat rigorous.










    share|cite|improve this question

























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      Under which conditions for a real function $f(x)$ is
      $$
      left| int_1^x left fleft(fracxwright) - fleft(leftlfloor fracxw rightrfloorright) right cosleft(wright) , rm dw right|
      $$
      finite, as $xrightarrow infty$.



      The point here is that the $cos $ function is present for cancellation of most parts. I was thinking to expand
      $$
      fleft(fracxwright) = fleft(leftlfloorfracxwrightrfloorright) + f'left(leftlfloorfracxwrightrfloorright) underbraceleft(fracxw - leftlfloorfracxwrightrfloor right)_cal O(1) + cal Oleft( left(fracxw - leftlfloorfracxwrightrfloor right)^2 right)
      $$
      so that $|f'(x)|$ must at least be bounded as $xrightarrow infty$.



      But is it true that for any $cal O(1)$ function $g(x)$
      $$
      left| int_1^x g(w) cosleft(wright) , rm dw right|
      $$
      is finite as $xrightarrow infty$? I mean it is obviously not true if I choose $g(x)=cos(x)$, so there must be some restrictions as in $cos(x)$ and $g(x)$ are not correlated.



      I hope it is clear what I want. I was trying to make it somewhat rigorous.










      share|cite|improve this question















      Under which conditions for a real function $f(x)$ is
      $$
      left| int_1^x left fleft(fracxwright) - fleft(leftlfloor fracxw rightrfloorright) right cosleft(wright) , rm dw right|
      $$
      finite, as $xrightarrow infty$.



      The point here is that the $cos $ function is present for cancellation of most parts. I was thinking to expand
      $$
      fleft(fracxwright) = fleft(leftlfloorfracxwrightrfloorright) + f'left(leftlfloorfracxwrightrfloorright) underbraceleft(fracxw - leftlfloorfracxwrightrfloor right)_cal O(1) + cal Oleft( left(fracxw - leftlfloorfracxwrightrfloor right)^2 right)
      $$
      so that $|f'(x)|$ must at least be bounded as $xrightarrow infty$.



      But is it true that for any $cal O(1)$ function $g(x)$
      $$
      left| int_1^x g(w) cosleft(wright) , rm dw right|
      $$
      is finite as $xrightarrow infty$? I mean it is obviously not true if I choose $g(x)=cos(x)$, so there must be some restrictions as in $cos(x)$ and $g(x)$ are not correlated.



      I hope it is clear what I want. I was trying to make it somewhat rigorous.







      real-analysis oscillatory-integral






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Sep 10 at 21:20

























      asked Sep 10 at 21:08









      Diger

      757310




      757310

























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2912367%2foscillatory-cancellation-of-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest



































          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2912367%2foscillatory-cancellation-of-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

          Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

          Carbon dioxide