âSqueezing inâ a covering between an exterior lebesgue measure and epsilon.
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $E subseteq mathbbR^d$. Let $epsilon > 0$. Show that there
exist some countable covering $Q_k$ such that
$$|E|_e leq sum_k textvol(Q_k) leq |E|_e + epsilon$$
I need a hint on how to proceed with such a proof, not necessarily a full solution. I think there is some property of infimums that lets me "squeeze" in numbers, but I don't know what that property is.
measure-theory
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $E subseteq mathbbR^d$. Let $epsilon > 0$. Show that there
exist some countable covering $Q_k$ such that
$$|E|_e leq sum_k textvol(Q_k) leq |E|_e + epsilon$$
I need a hint on how to proceed with such a proof, not necessarily a full solution. I think there is some property of infimums that lets me "squeeze" in numbers, but I don't know what that property is.
measure-theory
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $E subseteq mathbbR^d$. Let $epsilon > 0$. Show that there
exist some countable covering $Q_k$ such that
$$|E|_e leq sum_k textvol(Q_k) leq |E|_e + epsilon$$
I need a hint on how to proceed with such a proof, not necessarily a full solution. I think there is some property of infimums that lets me "squeeze" in numbers, but I don't know what that property is.
measure-theory
Let $E subseteq mathbbR^d$. Let $epsilon > 0$. Show that there
exist some countable covering $Q_k$ such that
$$|E|_e leq sum_k textvol(Q_k) leq |E|_e + epsilon$$
I need a hint on how to proceed with such a proof, not necessarily a full solution. I think there is some property of infimums that lets me "squeeze" in numbers, but I don't know what that property is.
measure-theory
measure-theory
asked Sep 10 at 20:08
Tomislav Ostojich
559313
559313
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
If $|E|_e = infty$, pick a trivial covering that diverges. Otherwise, since
$$
|E|_e = inf left sum_n geq 1operatornamevol(Q_k) : Q_k_k geq 1 text covers $E$ right
$$
for any $varepsilon > 0$, there exists some covering $Q_k_k geq 1$ so that
$$
0 leq sum_n geq 1operatornamevol(Q_k) - |E|_e < varepsilon
$$
which is exactly what you have to prove.
The property we are using is the following, assuming that you've defined the infimum as the 'larger' lower bound of a set:
Proposition. Let $A subseteq mathbbR$ and $iota := inf A$. Then, for any $varepsilon > 0$ there exists $a in A$ so that $0 leq a - iota < varepsilon$.
Proof. Let $varepsilon > 0$. Since $iota < iota + varepsilon$, the latter cannot be a lower bound for $A$ because $iota$ is an infimum. Thus, there exists $a in A$ so that $a < iota + varepsilon$. Therefore,
$$
0 leq a - iota < varepsilon
$$
as desired, with the first inequality given by the fact that $iota$ is by construction less or equal than $a$. $square$
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
If $|E|_e = infty$, pick a trivial covering that diverges. Otherwise, since
$$
|E|_e = inf left sum_n geq 1operatornamevol(Q_k) : Q_k_k geq 1 text covers $E$ right
$$
for any $varepsilon > 0$, there exists some covering $Q_k_k geq 1$ so that
$$
0 leq sum_n geq 1operatornamevol(Q_k) - |E|_e < varepsilon
$$
which is exactly what you have to prove.
The property we are using is the following, assuming that you've defined the infimum as the 'larger' lower bound of a set:
Proposition. Let $A subseteq mathbbR$ and $iota := inf A$. Then, for any $varepsilon > 0$ there exists $a in A$ so that $0 leq a - iota < varepsilon$.
Proof. Let $varepsilon > 0$. Since $iota < iota + varepsilon$, the latter cannot be a lower bound for $A$ because $iota$ is an infimum. Thus, there exists $a in A$ so that $a < iota + varepsilon$. Therefore,
$$
0 leq a - iota < varepsilon
$$
as desired, with the first inequality given by the fact that $iota$ is by construction less or equal than $a$. $square$
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
If $|E|_e = infty$, pick a trivial covering that diverges. Otherwise, since
$$
|E|_e = inf left sum_n geq 1operatornamevol(Q_k) : Q_k_k geq 1 text covers $E$ right
$$
for any $varepsilon > 0$, there exists some covering $Q_k_k geq 1$ so that
$$
0 leq sum_n geq 1operatornamevol(Q_k) - |E|_e < varepsilon
$$
which is exactly what you have to prove.
The property we are using is the following, assuming that you've defined the infimum as the 'larger' lower bound of a set:
Proposition. Let $A subseteq mathbbR$ and $iota := inf A$. Then, for any $varepsilon > 0$ there exists $a in A$ so that $0 leq a - iota < varepsilon$.
Proof. Let $varepsilon > 0$. Since $iota < iota + varepsilon$, the latter cannot be a lower bound for $A$ because $iota$ is an infimum. Thus, there exists $a in A$ so that $a < iota + varepsilon$. Therefore,
$$
0 leq a - iota < varepsilon
$$
as desired, with the first inequality given by the fact that $iota$ is by construction less or equal than $a$. $square$
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
If $|E|_e = infty$, pick a trivial covering that diverges. Otherwise, since
$$
|E|_e = inf left sum_n geq 1operatornamevol(Q_k) : Q_k_k geq 1 text covers $E$ right
$$
for any $varepsilon > 0$, there exists some covering $Q_k_k geq 1$ so that
$$
0 leq sum_n geq 1operatornamevol(Q_k) - |E|_e < varepsilon
$$
which is exactly what you have to prove.
The property we are using is the following, assuming that you've defined the infimum as the 'larger' lower bound of a set:
Proposition. Let $A subseteq mathbbR$ and $iota := inf A$. Then, for any $varepsilon > 0$ there exists $a in A$ so that $0 leq a - iota < varepsilon$.
Proof. Let $varepsilon > 0$. Since $iota < iota + varepsilon$, the latter cannot be a lower bound for $A$ because $iota$ is an infimum. Thus, there exists $a in A$ so that $a < iota + varepsilon$. Therefore,
$$
0 leq a - iota < varepsilon
$$
as desired, with the first inequality given by the fact that $iota$ is by construction less or equal than $a$. $square$
If $|E|_e = infty$, pick a trivial covering that diverges. Otherwise, since
$$
|E|_e = inf left sum_n geq 1operatornamevol(Q_k) : Q_k_k geq 1 text covers $E$ right
$$
for any $varepsilon > 0$, there exists some covering $Q_k_k geq 1$ so that
$$
0 leq sum_n geq 1operatornamevol(Q_k) - |E|_e < varepsilon
$$
which is exactly what you have to prove.
The property we are using is the following, assuming that you've defined the infimum as the 'larger' lower bound of a set:
Proposition. Let $A subseteq mathbbR$ and $iota := inf A$. Then, for any $varepsilon > 0$ there exists $a in A$ so that $0 leq a - iota < varepsilon$.
Proof. Let $varepsilon > 0$. Since $iota < iota + varepsilon$, the latter cannot be a lower bound for $A$ because $iota$ is an infimum. Thus, there exists $a in A$ so that $a < iota + varepsilon$. Therefore,
$$
0 leq a - iota < varepsilon
$$
as desired, with the first inequality given by the fact that $iota$ is by construction less or equal than $a$. $square$
answered Sep 10 at 20:18
Guido A.
4,858728
4,858728
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2912290%2fsqueezing-in-a-covering-between-an-exterior-lebesgue-measure-and-epsilon%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password