“Squeezing in” a covering between an exterior lebesgue measure and epsilon.

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite













Let $E subseteq mathbbR^d$. Let $epsilon > 0$. Show that there
exist some countable covering $Q_k$ such that



$$|E|_e leq sum_k textvol(Q_k) leq |E|_e + epsilon$$




I need a hint on how to proceed with such a proof, not necessarily a full solution. I think there is some property of infimums that lets me "squeeze" in numbers, but I don't know what that property is.










share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite













    Let $E subseteq mathbbR^d$. Let $epsilon > 0$. Show that there
    exist some countable covering $Q_k$ such that



    $$|E|_e leq sum_k textvol(Q_k) leq |E|_e + epsilon$$




    I need a hint on how to proceed with such a proof, not necessarily a full solution. I think there is some property of infimums that lets me "squeeze" in numbers, but I don't know what that property is.










    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite












      Let $E subseteq mathbbR^d$. Let $epsilon > 0$. Show that there
      exist some countable covering $Q_k$ such that



      $$|E|_e leq sum_k textvol(Q_k) leq |E|_e + epsilon$$




      I need a hint on how to proceed with such a proof, not necessarily a full solution. I think there is some property of infimums that lets me "squeeze" in numbers, but I don't know what that property is.










      share|cite|improve this question














      Let $E subseteq mathbbR^d$. Let $epsilon > 0$. Show that there
      exist some countable covering $Q_k$ such that



      $$|E|_e leq sum_k textvol(Q_k) leq |E|_e + epsilon$$




      I need a hint on how to proceed with such a proof, not necessarily a full solution. I think there is some property of infimums that lets me "squeeze" in numbers, but I don't know what that property is.







      measure-theory






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Sep 10 at 20:08









      Tomislav Ostojich

      559313




      559313




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          If $|E|_e = infty$, pick a trivial covering that diverges. Otherwise, since



          $$
          |E|_e = inf left sum_n geq 1operatornamevol(Q_k) : Q_k_k geq 1 text covers $E$ right
          $$



          for any $varepsilon > 0$, there exists some covering $Q_k_k geq 1$ so that



          $$
          0 leq sum_n geq 1operatornamevol(Q_k) - |E|_e < varepsilon
          $$



          which is exactly what you have to prove.



          The property we are using is the following, assuming that you've defined the infimum as the 'larger' lower bound of a set:




          Proposition. Let $A subseteq mathbbR$ and $iota := inf A$. Then, for any $varepsilon > 0$ there exists $a in A$ so that $0 leq a - iota < varepsilon$.




          Proof. Let $varepsilon > 0$. Since $iota < iota + varepsilon$, the latter cannot be a lower bound for $A$ because $iota$ is an infimum. Thus, there exists $a in A$ so that $a < iota + varepsilon$. Therefore,



          $$
          0 leq a - iota < varepsilon
          $$



          as desired, with the first inequality given by the fact that $iota$ is by construction less or equal than $a$. $square$






          share|cite|improve this answer




















            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2912290%2fsqueezing-in-a-covering-between-an-exterior-lebesgue-measure-and-epsilon%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            1
            down vote













            If $|E|_e = infty$, pick a trivial covering that diverges. Otherwise, since



            $$
            |E|_e = inf left sum_n geq 1operatornamevol(Q_k) : Q_k_k geq 1 text covers $E$ right
            $$



            for any $varepsilon > 0$, there exists some covering $Q_k_k geq 1$ so that



            $$
            0 leq sum_n geq 1operatornamevol(Q_k) - |E|_e < varepsilon
            $$



            which is exactly what you have to prove.



            The property we are using is the following, assuming that you've defined the infimum as the 'larger' lower bound of a set:




            Proposition. Let $A subseteq mathbbR$ and $iota := inf A$. Then, for any $varepsilon > 0$ there exists $a in A$ so that $0 leq a - iota < varepsilon$.




            Proof. Let $varepsilon > 0$. Since $iota < iota + varepsilon$, the latter cannot be a lower bound for $A$ because $iota$ is an infimum. Thus, there exists $a in A$ so that $a < iota + varepsilon$. Therefore,



            $$
            0 leq a - iota < varepsilon
            $$



            as desired, with the first inequality given by the fact that $iota$ is by construction less or equal than $a$. $square$






            share|cite|improve this answer
























              up vote
              1
              down vote













              If $|E|_e = infty$, pick a trivial covering that diverges. Otherwise, since



              $$
              |E|_e = inf left sum_n geq 1operatornamevol(Q_k) : Q_k_k geq 1 text covers $E$ right
              $$



              for any $varepsilon > 0$, there exists some covering $Q_k_k geq 1$ so that



              $$
              0 leq sum_n geq 1operatornamevol(Q_k) - |E|_e < varepsilon
              $$



              which is exactly what you have to prove.



              The property we are using is the following, assuming that you've defined the infimum as the 'larger' lower bound of a set:




              Proposition. Let $A subseteq mathbbR$ and $iota := inf A$. Then, for any $varepsilon > 0$ there exists $a in A$ so that $0 leq a - iota < varepsilon$.




              Proof. Let $varepsilon > 0$. Since $iota < iota + varepsilon$, the latter cannot be a lower bound for $A$ because $iota$ is an infimum. Thus, there exists $a in A$ so that $a < iota + varepsilon$. Therefore,



              $$
              0 leq a - iota < varepsilon
              $$



              as desired, with the first inequality given by the fact that $iota$ is by construction less or equal than $a$. $square$






              share|cite|improve this answer






















                up vote
                1
                down vote










                up vote
                1
                down vote









                If $|E|_e = infty$, pick a trivial covering that diverges. Otherwise, since



                $$
                |E|_e = inf left sum_n geq 1operatornamevol(Q_k) : Q_k_k geq 1 text covers $E$ right
                $$



                for any $varepsilon > 0$, there exists some covering $Q_k_k geq 1$ so that



                $$
                0 leq sum_n geq 1operatornamevol(Q_k) - |E|_e < varepsilon
                $$



                which is exactly what you have to prove.



                The property we are using is the following, assuming that you've defined the infimum as the 'larger' lower bound of a set:




                Proposition. Let $A subseteq mathbbR$ and $iota := inf A$. Then, for any $varepsilon > 0$ there exists $a in A$ so that $0 leq a - iota < varepsilon$.




                Proof. Let $varepsilon > 0$. Since $iota < iota + varepsilon$, the latter cannot be a lower bound for $A$ because $iota$ is an infimum. Thus, there exists $a in A$ so that $a < iota + varepsilon$. Therefore,



                $$
                0 leq a - iota < varepsilon
                $$



                as desired, with the first inequality given by the fact that $iota$ is by construction less or equal than $a$. $square$






                share|cite|improve this answer












                If $|E|_e = infty$, pick a trivial covering that diverges. Otherwise, since



                $$
                |E|_e = inf left sum_n geq 1operatornamevol(Q_k) : Q_k_k geq 1 text covers $E$ right
                $$



                for any $varepsilon > 0$, there exists some covering $Q_k_k geq 1$ so that



                $$
                0 leq sum_n geq 1operatornamevol(Q_k) - |E|_e < varepsilon
                $$



                which is exactly what you have to prove.



                The property we are using is the following, assuming that you've defined the infimum as the 'larger' lower bound of a set:




                Proposition. Let $A subseteq mathbbR$ and $iota := inf A$. Then, for any $varepsilon > 0$ there exists $a in A$ so that $0 leq a - iota < varepsilon$.




                Proof. Let $varepsilon > 0$. Since $iota < iota + varepsilon$, the latter cannot be a lower bound for $A$ because $iota$ is an infimum. Thus, there exists $a in A$ so that $a < iota + varepsilon$. Therefore,



                $$
                0 leq a - iota < varepsilon
                $$



                as desired, with the first inequality given by the fact that $iota$ is by construction less or equal than $a$. $square$







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Sep 10 at 20:18









                Guido A.

                4,858728




                4,858728



























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2912290%2fsqueezing-in-a-covering-between-an-exterior-lebesgue-measure-and-epsilon%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    這個網誌中的熱門文章

                    Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

                    Is there any way to eliminate the singular point to solve this integral by hand or by approximations?

                    Strongly p-embedded subgroups and p-Sylow subgroups.