Evaluate $lim_xrightarrow0frac(x-arctan(x))ln(1+2sin(x))(1+cosx)(e^x-1-x)^2$ using Taylor

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I want to evaluate the following limit:



$$lim_xrightarrow0frac(x-arctan(x))ln(1+2sin(x))(1+cosx)(e^x-1-x)^2$$



For example, we have $x-arctanx$. They are both $0$. This seems to be the so called "cancellation of terms". Therefore I apply the Taylor series:



$$arctanx=x-fracx^33+o(x^3)$$



Therefore



$$x-arctanxsim x-x +fracx^33+o(x^3)=fracx^33+o(x^3)$$



Somebody solved this problem textbook and developed this to the fifth term (not third). Now a few questions arise:



  • Why do I need to develop this Taylor series to the fifth term (assuming I have to).

  • Do I need to develop every function to the same term in my limit?

Any hints?










share|cite|improve this question



























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite












    I want to evaluate the following limit:



    $$lim_xrightarrow0frac(x-arctan(x))ln(1+2sin(x))(1+cosx)(e^x-1-x)^2$$



    For example, we have $x-arctanx$. They are both $0$. This seems to be the so called "cancellation of terms". Therefore I apply the Taylor series:



    $$arctanx=x-fracx^33+o(x^3)$$



    Therefore



    $$x-arctanxsim x-x +fracx^33+o(x^3)=fracx^33+o(x^3)$$



    Somebody solved this problem textbook and developed this to the fifth term (not third). Now a few questions arise:



    • Why do I need to develop this Taylor series to the fifth term (assuming I have to).

    • Do I need to develop every function to the same term in my limit?

    Any hints?










    share|cite|improve this question

























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite











      I want to evaluate the following limit:



      $$lim_xrightarrow0frac(x-arctan(x))ln(1+2sin(x))(1+cosx)(e^x-1-x)^2$$



      For example, we have $x-arctanx$. They are both $0$. This seems to be the so called "cancellation of terms". Therefore I apply the Taylor series:



      $$arctanx=x-fracx^33+o(x^3)$$



      Therefore



      $$x-arctanxsim x-x +fracx^33+o(x^3)=fracx^33+o(x^3)$$



      Somebody solved this problem textbook and developed this to the fifth term (not third). Now a few questions arise:



      • Why do I need to develop this Taylor series to the fifth term (assuming I have to).

      • Do I need to develop every function to the same term in my limit?

      Any hints?










      share|cite|improve this question















      I want to evaluate the following limit:



      $$lim_xrightarrow0frac(x-arctan(x))ln(1+2sin(x))(1+cosx)(e^x-1-x)^2$$



      For example, we have $x-arctanx$. They are both $0$. This seems to be the so called "cancellation of terms". Therefore I apply the Taylor series:



      $$arctanx=x-fracx^33+o(x^3)$$



      Therefore



      $$x-arctanxsim x-x +fracx^33+o(x^3)=fracx^33+o(x^3)$$



      Somebody solved this problem textbook and developed this to the fifth term (not third). Now a few questions arise:



      • Why do I need to develop this Taylor series to the fifth term (assuming I have to).

      • Do I need to develop every function to the same term in my limit?

      Any hints?







      calculus limits taylor-expansion






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Sep 10 at 18:21

























      asked Sep 10 at 18:14









      Cesare

      734410




      734410




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          For the direct questions: One must, needs to, determine powers of the expansion beyond constant factors to determine the behavior of the expansions; Not every function has the same powers in an expansion. The result then becomes "at least get a few powers of $x$ of each function".
          This becomes more familiar by the example in question. Consider each of the four functions first:
          beginalign
          x - tan^-1(x) &= fracx^33 - fracx^55 + fracx^77 + mathcalO(x^9) \
          ln(1 + 2 , sin(x)) &= 2 x - 2 x^2 + frac7 x^33 - frac10 x^43 + mathcalO(x^5) \
          1 + cos(x) &= 2 cos^2left(fracx2right) = 2 - fracx^22 + fracx^424 + mathcalO(x^6) \
          (e^x - 1 - x)^2 &= fracx^44 + fracx^56 + frac5 x^672 + mathcalO(x^7).
          endalign
          With these expansions it is seen that the growth of powers of $x$ are not the same, but at least each expansion has powers of $x^4$ or greater.



          Now, for the limit.
          beginalign
          F(x) &= frac(x - tan^-1(x) ) , ln(1 + 2 , sin(x))2 , cos^2left(fracx2right) , (e^x - 1 - x)^2 \
          &= fracleft(fracx^33 - fracx^55 + fracx^77 + cdotsright) left( 2 x - 2 x^2 + frac7 x^33 - frac10 x^43 + cdotsright)left(2 - fracx^22 + fracx^424 + cdots right) left(fracx^44 + fracx^56 + frac5 x^672 + cdots right) \
          &= fracfrac2 x^43 - frac2 x^53 + frac17 x^645 + cdotsfracx^42 + fracx^56 + fracx^672 + cdots \
          &= fracfrac23 - frac2 x3 + frac17 x^245 + cdotsfrac12 + fracx6 + fracx^272 + cdots \
          &= frac43 , left( 1 - frac4 x3 + frac49 x^236 + cdots right)
          endalign
          and
          beginalign
          lim_x to 0 F(x) &= lim_x to 0 frac43 , left( 1 - frac4 x3 + frac49 x^236 + mathcalO(x^3) right) \
          &= frac43
          endalign






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • Thanks, why did you decide to get at least powers of $x^4$?
            – Cesare
            Sep 10 at 19:26










          • @Cesare For the exponential term the expansion starts with $x^4$, so terms have to be at least one greater than this, ie $x^5$. In the resulting limit it turns out that powers greater than $x^2$ are not really beneficial.
            – Leucippus
            Sep 10 at 19:52

















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          You don't need to expand every function in your fraction to the same limit. For example, $1+cos xto 2$ as $xto 0$ so you don't need to anything at all here.



          Thus, the only problem is now $$(e^x-1-x)^2 = left(fracx^22+o(x^2)right)^2 = x^4left(frac 14+o(x)right)$$
          This means you just need to match this up in your numerator and it should be obvious from this point on.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • Thank you. What do you mean by "you just need to match this up in your numerator"? I don't understand.
            – Cesare
            Sep 10 at 18:36










          • @Cesare if this problem is well-posed, meaning the answer is a finite number, then it must be the case that the numerator is of the same order $O(x^4)$. This means that you need to expand the two terms in the numerator to high enough power to obtain and verify that indeed the numerator is equal to something like $Cx^4+o(x).$
            – dezdichado
            Sep 10 at 18:47










          • Thanks, so you mean that the numerator must be of the same power of the denominator?
            – Cesare
            Sep 10 at 18:49











          • yes if and only if the limit is finite.
            – dezdichado
            Sep 10 at 19:09










          • The other answer proves otherwise
            – Cesare
            Sep 10 at 19:25

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          enter image description here



          1.i have used the expansion of e^x , as have used the standsr limits.
          2. you expand till the terms, such that order if zero in numerator and denominator can be compared to one and other
          i have missed 2 in denominator






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • Hi, I can't see the image you posted.
            – Cesare
            Sep 10 at 18:28










          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2912191%2fevaluate-lim-x-rightarrow0-fracx-arctanx-ln12-sinx1-cosx%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes








          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          For the direct questions: One must, needs to, determine powers of the expansion beyond constant factors to determine the behavior of the expansions; Not every function has the same powers in an expansion. The result then becomes "at least get a few powers of $x$ of each function".
          This becomes more familiar by the example in question. Consider each of the four functions first:
          beginalign
          x - tan^-1(x) &= fracx^33 - fracx^55 + fracx^77 + mathcalO(x^9) \
          ln(1 + 2 , sin(x)) &= 2 x - 2 x^2 + frac7 x^33 - frac10 x^43 + mathcalO(x^5) \
          1 + cos(x) &= 2 cos^2left(fracx2right) = 2 - fracx^22 + fracx^424 + mathcalO(x^6) \
          (e^x - 1 - x)^2 &= fracx^44 + fracx^56 + frac5 x^672 + mathcalO(x^7).
          endalign
          With these expansions it is seen that the growth of powers of $x$ are not the same, but at least each expansion has powers of $x^4$ or greater.



          Now, for the limit.
          beginalign
          F(x) &= frac(x - tan^-1(x) ) , ln(1 + 2 , sin(x))2 , cos^2left(fracx2right) , (e^x - 1 - x)^2 \
          &= fracleft(fracx^33 - fracx^55 + fracx^77 + cdotsright) left( 2 x - 2 x^2 + frac7 x^33 - frac10 x^43 + cdotsright)left(2 - fracx^22 + fracx^424 + cdots right) left(fracx^44 + fracx^56 + frac5 x^672 + cdots right) \
          &= fracfrac2 x^43 - frac2 x^53 + frac17 x^645 + cdotsfracx^42 + fracx^56 + fracx^672 + cdots \
          &= fracfrac23 - frac2 x3 + frac17 x^245 + cdotsfrac12 + fracx6 + fracx^272 + cdots \
          &= frac43 , left( 1 - frac4 x3 + frac49 x^236 + cdots right)
          endalign
          and
          beginalign
          lim_x to 0 F(x) &= lim_x to 0 frac43 , left( 1 - frac4 x3 + frac49 x^236 + mathcalO(x^3) right) \
          &= frac43
          endalign






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • Thanks, why did you decide to get at least powers of $x^4$?
            – Cesare
            Sep 10 at 19:26










          • @Cesare For the exponential term the expansion starts with $x^4$, so terms have to be at least one greater than this, ie $x^5$. In the resulting limit it turns out that powers greater than $x^2$ are not really beneficial.
            – Leucippus
            Sep 10 at 19:52














          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          For the direct questions: One must, needs to, determine powers of the expansion beyond constant factors to determine the behavior of the expansions; Not every function has the same powers in an expansion. The result then becomes "at least get a few powers of $x$ of each function".
          This becomes more familiar by the example in question. Consider each of the four functions first:
          beginalign
          x - tan^-1(x) &= fracx^33 - fracx^55 + fracx^77 + mathcalO(x^9) \
          ln(1 + 2 , sin(x)) &= 2 x - 2 x^2 + frac7 x^33 - frac10 x^43 + mathcalO(x^5) \
          1 + cos(x) &= 2 cos^2left(fracx2right) = 2 - fracx^22 + fracx^424 + mathcalO(x^6) \
          (e^x - 1 - x)^2 &= fracx^44 + fracx^56 + frac5 x^672 + mathcalO(x^7).
          endalign
          With these expansions it is seen that the growth of powers of $x$ are not the same, but at least each expansion has powers of $x^4$ or greater.



          Now, for the limit.
          beginalign
          F(x) &= frac(x - tan^-1(x) ) , ln(1 + 2 , sin(x))2 , cos^2left(fracx2right) , (e^x - 1 - x)^2 \
          &= fracleft(fracx^33 - fracx^55 + fracx^77 + cdotsright) left( 2 x - 2 x^2 + frac7 x^33 - frac10 x^43 + cdotsright)left(2 - fracx^22 + fracx^424 + cdots right) left(fracx^44 + fracx^56 + frac5 x^672 + cdots right) \
          &= fracfrac2 x^43 - frac2 x^53 + frac17 x^645 + cdotsfracx^42 + fracx^56 + fracx^672 + cdots \
          &= fracfrac23 - frac2 x3 + frac17 x^245 + cdotsfrac12 + fracx6 + fracx^272 + cdots \
          &= frac43 , left( 1 - frac4 x3 + frac49 x^236 + cdots right)
          endalign
          and
          beginalign
          lim_x to 0 F(x) &= lim_x to 0 frac43 , left( 1 - frac4 x3 + frac49 x^236 + mathcalO(x^3) right) \
          &= frac43
          endalign






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • Thanks, why did you decide to get at least powers of $x^4$?
            – Cesare
            Sep 10 at 19:26










          • @Cesare For the exponential term the expansion starts with $x^4$, so terms have to be at least one greater than this, ie $x^5$. In the resulting limit it turns out that powers greater than $x^2$ are not really beneficial.
            – Leucippus
            Sep 10 at 19:52












          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted






          For the direct questions: One must, needs to, determine powers of the expansion beyond constant factors to determine the behavior of the expansions; Not every function has the same powers in an expansion. The result then becomes "at least get a few powers of $x$ of each function".
          This becomes more familiar by the example in question. Consider each of the four functions first:
          beginalign
          x - tan^-1(x) &= fracx^33 - fracx^55 + fracx^77 + mathcalO(x^9) \
          ln(1 + 2 , sin(x)) &= 2 x - 2 x^2 + frac7 x^33 - frac10 x^43 + mathcalO(x^5) \
          1 + cos(x) &= 2 cos^2left(fracx2right) = 2 - fracx^22 + fracx^424 + mathcalO(x^6) \
          (e^x - 1 - x)^2 &= fracx^44 + fracx^56 + frac5 x^672 + mathcalO(x^7).
          endalign
          With these expansions it is seen that the growth of powers of $x$ are not the same, but at least each expansion has powers of $x^4$ or greater.



          Now, for the limit.
          beginalign
          F(x) &= frac(x - tan^-1(x) ) , ln(1 + 2 , sin(x))2 , cos^2left(fracx2right) , (e^x - 1 - x)^2 \
          &= fracleft(fracx^33 - fracx^55 + fracx^77 + cdotsright) left( 2 x - 2 x^2 + frac7 x^33 - frac10 x^43 + cdotsright)left(2 - fracx^22 + fracx^424 + cdots right) left(fracx^44 + fracx^56 + frac5 x^672 + cdots right) \
          &= fracfrac2 x^43 - frac2 x^53 + frac17 x^645 + cdotsfracx^42 + fracx^56 + fracx^672 + cdots \
          &= fracfrac23 - frac2 x3 + frac17 x^245 + cdotsfrac12 + fracx6 + fracx^272 + cdots \
          &= frac43 , left( 1 - frac4 x3 + frac49 x^236 + cdots right)
          endalign
          and
          beginalign
          lim_x to 0 F(x) &= lim_x to 0 frac43 , left( 1 - frac4 x3 + frac49 x^236 + mathcalO(x^3) right) \
          &= frac43
          endalign






          share|cite|improve this answer












          For the direct questions: One must, needs to, determine powers of the expansion beyond constant factors to determine the behavior of the expansions; Not every function has the same powers in an expansion. The result then becomes "at least get a few powers of $x$ of each function".
          This becomes more familiar by the example in question. Consider each of the four functions first:
          beginalign
          x - tan^-1(x) &= fracx^33 - fracx^55 + fracx^77 + mathcalO(x^9) \
          ln(1 + 2 , sin(x)) &= 2 x - 2 x^2 + frac7 x^33 - frac10 x^43 + mathcalO(x^5) \
          1 + cos(x) &= 2 cos^2left(fracx2right) = 2 - fracx^22 + fracx^424 + mathcalO(x^6) \
          (e^x - 1 - x)^2 &= fracx^44 + fracx^56 + frac5 x^672 + mathcalO(x^7).
          endalign
          With these expansions it is seen that the growth of powers of $x$ are not the same, but at least each expansion has powers of $x^4$ or greater.



          Now, for the limit.
          beginalign
          F(x) &= frac(x - tan^-1(x) ) , ln(1 + 2 , sin(x))2 , cos^2left(fracx2right) , (e^x - 1 - x)^2 \
          &= fracleft(fracx^33 - fracx^55 + fracx^77 + cdotsright) left( 2 x - 2 x^2 + frac7 x^33 - frac10 x^43 + cdotsright)left(2 - fracx^22 + fracx^424 + cdots right) left(fracx^44 + fracx^56 + frac5 x^672 + cdots right) \
          &= fracfrac2 x^43 - frac2 x^53 + frac17 x^645 + cdotsfracx^42 + fracx^56 + fracx^672 + cdots \
          &= fracfrac23 - frac2 x3 + frac17 x^245 + cdotsfrac12 + fracx6 + fracx^272 + cdots \
          &= frac43 , left( 1 - frac4 x3 + frac49 x^236 + cdots right)
          endalign
          and
          beginalign
          lim_x to 0 F(x) &= lim_x to 0 frac43 , left( 1 - frac4 x3 + frac49 x^236 + mathcalO(x^3) right) \
          &= frac43
          endalign







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Sep 10 at 18:56









          Leucippus

          19k102769




          19k102769











          • Thanks, why did you decide to get at least powers of $x^4$?
            – Cesare
            Sep 10 at 19:26










          • @Cesare For the exponential term the expansion starts with $x^4$, so terms have to be at least one greater than this, ie $x^5$. In the resulting limit it turns out that powers greater than $x^2$ are not really beneficial.
            – Leucippus
            Sep 10 at 19:52
















          • Thanks, why did you decide to get at least powers of $x^4$?
            – Cesare
            Sep 10 at 19:26










          • @Cesare For the exponential term the expansion starts with $x^4$, so terms have to be at least one greater than this, ie $x^5$. In the resulting limit it turns out that powers greater than $x^2$ are not really beneficial.
            – Leucippus
            Sep 10 at 19:52















          Thanks, why did you decide to get at least powers of $x^4$?
          – Cesare
          Sep 10 at 19:26




          Thanks, why did you decide to get at least powers of $x^4$?
          – Cesare
          Sep 10 at 19:26












          @Cesare For the exponential term the expansion starts with $x^4$, so terms have to be at least one greater than this, ie $x^5$. In the resulting limit it turns out that powers greater than $x^2$ are not really beneficial.
          – Leucippus
          Sep 10 at 19:52




          @Cesare For the exponential term the expansion starts with $x^4$, so terms have to be at least one greater than this, ie $x^5$. In the resulting limit it turns out that powers greater than $x^2$ are not really beneficial.
          – Leucippus
          Sep 10 at 19:52










          up vote
          1
          down vote













          You don't need to expand every function in your fraction to the same limit. For example, $1+cos xto 2$ as $xto 0$ so you don't need to anything at all here.



          Thus, the only problem is now $$(e^x-1-x)^2 = left(fracx^22+o(x^2)right)^2 = x^4left(frac 14+o(x)right)$$
          This means you just need to match this up in your numerator and it should be obvious from this point on.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • Thank you. What do you mean by "you just need to match this up in your numerator"? I don't understand.
            – Cesare
            Sep 10 at 18:36










          • @Cesare if this problem is well-posed, meaning the answer is a finite number, then it must be the case that the numerator is of the same order $O(x^4)$. This means that you need to expand the two terms in the numerator to high enough power to obtain and verify that indeed the numerator is equal to something like $Cx^4+o(x).$
            – dezdichado
            Sep 10 at 18:47










          • Thanks, so you mean that the numerator must be of the same power of the denominator?
            – Cesare
            Sep 10 at 18:49











          • yes if and only if the limit is finite.
            – dezdichado
            Sep 10 at 19:09










          • The other answer proves otherwise
            – Cesare
            Sep 10 at 19:25














          up vote
          1
          down vote













          You don't need to expand every function in your fraction to the same limit. For example, $1+cos xto 2$ as $xto 0$ so you don't need to anything at all here.



          Thus, the only problem is now $$(e^x-1-x)^2 = left(fracx^22+o(x^2)right)^2 = x^4left(frac 14+o(x)right)$$
          This means you just need to match this up in your numerator and it should be obvious from this point on.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • Thank you. What do you mean by "you just need to match this up in your numerator"? I don't understand.
            – Cesare
            Sep 10 at 18:36










          • @Cesare if this problem is well-posed, meaning the answer is a finite number, then it must be the case that the numerator is of the same order $O(x^4)$. This means that you need to expand the two terms in the numerator to high enough power to obtain and verify that indeed the numerator is equal to something like $Cx^4+o(x).$
            – dezdichado
            Sep 10 at 18:47










          • Thanks, so you mean that the numerator must be of the same power of the denominator?
            – Cesare
            Sep 10 at 18:49











          • yes if and only if the limit is finite.
            – dezdichado
            Sep 10 at 19:09










          • The other answer proves otherwise
            – Cesare
            Sep 10 at 19:25












          up vote
          1
          down vote










          up vote
          1
          down vote









          You don't need to expand every function in your fraction to the same limit. For example, $1+cos xto 2$ as $xto 0$ so you don't need to anything at all here.



          Thus, the only problem is now $$(e^x-1-x)^2 = left(fracx^22+o(x^2)right)^2 = x^4left(frac 14+o(x)right)$$
          This means you just need to match this up in your numerator and it should be obvious from this point on.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          You don't need to expand every function in your fraction to the same limit. For example, $1+cos xto 2$ as $xto 0$ so you don't need to anything at all here.



          Thus, the only problem is now $$(e^x-1-x)^2 = left(fracx^22+o(x^2)right)^2 = x^4left(frac 14+o(x)right)$$
          This means you just need to match this up in your numerator and it should be obvious from this point on.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Sep 10 at 18:30









          dezdichado

          5,5651828




          5,5651828











          • Thank you. What do you mean by "you just need to match this up in your numerator"? I don't understand.
            – Cesare
            Sep 10 at 18:36










          • @Cesare if this problem is well-posed, meaning the answer is a finite number, then it must be the case that the numerator is of the same order $O(x^4)$. This means that you need to expand the two terms in the numerator to high enough power to obtain and verify that indeed the numerator is equal to something like $Cx^4+o(x).$
            – dezdichado
            Sep 10 at 18:47










          • Thanks, so you mean that the numerator must be of the same power of the denominator?
            – Cesare
            Sep 10 at 18:49











          • yes if and only if the limit is finite.
            – dezdichado
            Sep 10 at 19:09










          • The other answer proves otherwise
            – Cesare
            Sep 10 at 19:25
















          • Thank you. What do you mean by "you just need to match this up in your numerator"? I don't understand.
            – Cesare
            Sep 10 at 18:36










          • @Cesare if this problem is well-posed, meaning the answer is a finite number, then it must be the case that the numerator is of the same order $O(x^4)$. This means that you need to expand the two terms in the numerator to high enough power to obtain and verify that indeed the numerator is equal to something like $Cx^4+o(x).$
            – dezdichado
            Sep 10 at 18:47










          • Thanks, so you mean that the numerator must be of the same power of the denominator?
            – Cesare
            Sep 10 at 18:49











          • yes if and only if the limit is finite.
            – dezdichado
            Sep 10 at 19:09










          • The other answer proves otherwise
            – Cesare
            Sep 10 at 19:25















          Thank you. What do you mean by "you just need to match this up in your numerator"? I don't understand.
          – Cesare
          Sep 10 at 18:36




          Thank you. What do you mean by "you just need to match this up in your numerator"? I don't understand.
          – Cesare
          Sep 10 at 18:36












          @Cesare if this problem is well-posed, meaning the answer is a finite number, then it must be the case that the numerator is of the same order $O(x^4)$. This means that you need to expand the two terms in the numerator to high enough power to obtain and verify that indeed the numerator is equal to something like $Cx^4+o(x).$
          – dezdichado
          Sep 10 at 18:47




          @Cesare if this problem is well-posed, meaning the answer is a finite number, then it must be the case that the numerator is of the same order $O(x^4)$. This means that you need to expand the two terms in the numerator to high enough power to obtain and verify that indeed the numerator is equal to something like $Cx^4+o(x).$
          – dezdichado
          Sep 10 at 18:47












          Thanks, so you mean that the numerator must be of the same power of the denominator?
          – Cesare
          Sep 10 at 18:49





          Thanks, so you mean that the numerator must be of the same power of the denominator?
          – Cesare
          Sep 10 at 18:49













          yes if and only if the limit is finite.
          – dezdichado
          Sep 10 at 19:09




          yes if and only if the limit is finite.
          – dezdichado
          Sep 10 at 19:09












          The other answer proves otherwise
          – Cesare
          Sep 10 at 19:25




          The other answer proves otherwise
          – Cesare
          Sep 10 at 19:25










          up vote
          0
          down vote













          enter image description here



          1.i have used the expansion of e^x , as have used the standsr limits.
          2. you expand till the terms, such that order if zero in numerator and denominator can be compared to one and other
          i have missed 2 in denominator






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • Hi, I can't see the image you posted.
            – Cesare
            Sep 10 at 18:28














          up vote
          0
          down vote













          enter image description here



          1.i have used the expansion of e^x , as have used the standsr limits.
          2. you expand till the terms, such that order if zero in numerator and denominator can be compared to one and other
          i have missed 2 in denominator






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • Hi, I can't see the image you posted.
            – Cesare
            Sep 10 at 18:28












          up vote
          0
          down vote










          up vote
          0
          down vote









          enter image description here



          1.i have used the expansion of e^x , as have used the standsr limits.
          2. you expand till the terms, such that order if zero in numerator and denominator can be compared to one and other
          i have missed 2 in denominator






          share|cite|improve this answer














          enter image description here



          1.i have used the expansion of e^x , as have used the standsr limits.
          2. you expand till the terms, such that order if zero in numerator and denominator can be compared to one and other
          i have missed 2 in denominator







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Sep 10 at 18:32

























          answered Sep 10 at 18:28









          ashish deo singh

          1766




          1766











          • Hi, I can't see the image you posted.
            – Cesare
            Sep 10 at 18:28
















          • Hi, I can't see the image you posted.
            – Cesare
            Sep 10 at 18:28















          Hi, I can't see the image you posted.
          – Cesare
          Sep 10 at 18:28




          Hi, I can't see the image you posted.
          – Cesare
          Sep 10 at 18:28

















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2912191%2fevaluate-lim-x-rightarrow0-fracx-arctanx-ln12-sinx1-cosx%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          tkz-euclide: tkzDrawCircle[R] not working

          How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

          1st Magritte Awards