Congruence modulo p

Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Let $p$ be an odd prime and let $1leq n<p-1.$ Show that $$sum_t=1^pt^n equiv 0 pmodp$$
Remark: It seems one can not apply Fermat's little theorem directly as $n<p-1$
elementary-number-theory
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Let $p$ be an odd prime and let $1leq n<p-1.$ Show that $$sum_t=1^pt^n equiv 0 pmodp$$
Remark: It seems one can not apply Fermat's little theorem directly as $n<p-1$
elementary-number-theory
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Let $p$ be an odd prime and let $1leq n<p-1.$ Show that $$sum_t=1^pt^n equiv 0 pmodp$$
Remark: It seems one can not apply Fermat's little theorem directly as $n<p-1$
elementary-number-theory
Let $p$ be an odd prime and let $1leq n<p-1.$ Show that $$sum_t=1^pt^n equiv 0 pmodp$$
Remark: It seems one can not apply Fermat's little theorem directly as $n<p-1$
elementary-number-theory
elementary-number-theory
edited Oct 31 '12 at 14:15
Julián Aguirre
65.3k23894
65.3k23894
asked Oct 31 '12 at 12:37
user31899
1,5791030
1,5791030
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
up vote
6
down vote
accepted
We might as well sum to $p-1$. Let $g$ be a primitive root of $p$. Then $1$, $2$, $3$, and so on up to $p-1$ are congruent, in some order, to $g^0$, $g^1$, up to $g^p-2$.
So modulo $p$ the terms in our sum are congruent to
$g^0$, $g^n$, $g^2n$, up to $g^(p-2)n$. Sum this geometric progression. We get $dfracg^(p-1)n-1g^n-1$. The numerator is congruent to $0$. There is no problem with the denominator, since $nlt p-1$.
If one prefers not to use fractions, equivalently note that
$$left(1+g^n+g^2n+cdots+g^(p-2)nright)(1-g^n)=1-g^(p-1)n.$$
The right-hand side is congruent to $0$. But $1-g^n$ is not congruent to $0$, and the result follows.
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
Since the sets of reduced residue classes $1, 2, . . . , (p â 1)$ and $g, 2g, . . . , (p â 1)g$ are the same if $(g,p)=1$ the reason being:
if $r_1gequiv r_2gpmod p,$ where $1le r_1< r_2le p-1$
$implies r_1equiv r_2$ which is impossible, so $r_1gâ¢r_2gpmod p$.
So, $sum_1le xle p-1 x^n equiv sum_1le yle p-1 (gy)^n pmod p$
$implies pmid(g^n-1)sum_1le xle p-1 x^n $
If we take $g$ to be a primitive root, $pmid (g^n-1)iff phi(p)=(p-1)mid n$
Since $1le n<p-1,p$ can not divide $(g^n-1)implies sum_1le xle p-1 x^nequiv 0pmod p$
If $(p-1)mid n, sum_1le xle p-1 x^nequiv sum_1le xle p-11pmod p=p-1equiv -1pmod p $
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
Call
$$ p_n = sum_k=1^p k^n. $$
Since, by Fermat's little theorem, $p_nequiv p_n-p+1pmodp$ for all $n > p-1$, it is sufficient to show that
$$ forall nin[0,p-2],quad p_nequiv 0pmodp, $$
where the cases $n=0$ and $n=1$ are trivial. Since:
$$ x(x-1)cdotldotscdot(x-p+1)equiv x^p-xpmodp, $$
if $e_k(x_1,ldots,x_p)$ is the $k$-th elementary symmetric polynomial, we have:
$$ forall kin[0,p-2],quad e_k(1,ldots,p)equiv 0pmodp, $$
so, in virtue of Newton-Girard identities and induction we have:
$$forall kin[0,p-2],quad p_kequiv 0pmodp, $$
QED.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
EDIT:This is a wrong answer($r^n equiv t^n pmod p not Rightarrow r equiv t pmod p$). See the comments.
For $n=1$ is correct.
Now for any $n in 1,2,ldots,p-2$ we have that $1,2,ldots,p-1equiv 1,2^n,ldots,(p-1)^n pmod p$ since $r^n equiv t^n pmod p iff r equiv t pmod p$. Hence $$sum_t=1^pt^n equiv sum_t=1^pt equiv 0 pmodp .$$
I don't thing the $equiv$ is true. For example, if $n=2$, the sequence $1,2^2,3^2,...,(p-1)^2$ only has $fracp-12$ distinct elements
â Thomas Andrews
Oct 31 '12 at 12:52
1
Sorry, but this isn't completely watertight. With $n = 2$ and $p = 5$, you get $1^2, 2^2, 3^2, 4^2 cong 1, 4, 4, 1$
â Arthur
Oct 31 '12 at 12:53
Note that $1^2equiv (p-1)^2pmod p$, but $1notequiv p-1pmod p$
â Thomas Andrews
Oct 31 '12 at 12:53
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
WLOG assume $nk = p-1$ (if $n$ had factors coprime to $p-1$ they would just permute the sum, not change it's value, so remove them).
Put $S = (mathbb Z/pmathbb Z)^times$ and let $S^n$ denote the subgroup $ s in S $. The kernel of the map $S to S^n$ is the set of solutions of $z^n=1$ so $n|S^n| = |S|$. Details about subgroup here
This tells us that (mod p) the sum is equal to $n$ times the sum of the elements of $S^n$ so we just need to show that $$sum_s in S^ns equiv 0 pmod p$$ but since this is the set of solutions of $z^n-1=0$ by Vieta's formula they sum to $0$.
add a comment |Â
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
6
down vote
accepted
We might as well sum to $p-1$. Let $g$ be a primitive root of $p$. Then $1$, $2$, $3$, and so on up to $p-1$ are congruent, in some order, to $g^0$, $g^1$, up to $g^p-2$.
So modulo $p$ the terms in our sum are congruent to
$g^0$, $g^n$, $g^2n$, up to $g^(p-2)n$. Sum this geometric progression. We get $dfracg^(p-1)n-1g^n-1$. The numerator is congruent to $0$. There is no problem with the denominator, since $nlt p-1$.
If one prefers not to use fractions, equivalently note that
$$left(1+g^n+g^2n+cdots+g^(p-2)nright)(1-g^n)=1-g^(p-1)n.$$
The right-hand side is congruent to $0$. But $1-g^n$ is not congruent to $0$, and the result follows.
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
accepted
We might as well sum to $p-1$. Let $g$ be a primitive root of $p$. Then $1$, $2$, $3$, and so on up to $p-1$ are congruent, in some order, to $g^0$, $g^1$, up to $g^p-2$.
So modulo $p$ the terms in our sum are congruent to
$g^0$, $g^n$, $g^2n$, up to $g^(p-2)n$. Sum this geometric progression. We get $dfracg^(p-1)n-1g^n-1$. The numerator is congruent to $0$. There is no problem with the denominator, since $nlt p-1$.
If one prefers not to use fractions, equivalently note that
$$left(1+g^n+g^2n+cdots+g^(p-2)nright)(1-g^n)=1-g^(p-1)n.$$
The right-hand side is congruent to $0$. But $1-g^n$ is not congruent to $0$, and the result follows.
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
accepted
up vote
6
down vote
accepted
We might as well sum to $p-1$. Let $g$ be a primitive root of $p$. Then $1$, $2$, $3$, and so on up to $p-1$ are congruent, in some order, to $g^0$, $g^1$, up to $g^p-2$.
So modulo $p$ the terms in our sum are congruent to
$g^0$, $g^n$, $g^2n$, up to $g^(p-2)n$. Sum this geometric progression. We get $dfracg^(p-1)n-1g^n-1$. The numerator is congruent to $0$. There is no problem with the denominator, since $nlt p-1$.
If one prefers not to use fractions, equivalently note that
$$left(1+g^n+g^2n+cdots+g^(p-2)nright)(1-g^n)=1-g^(p-1)n.$$
The right-hand side is congruent to $0$. But $1-g^n$ is not congruent to $0$, and the result follows.
We might as well sum to $p-1$. Let $g$ be a primitive root of $p$. Then $1$, $2$, $3$, and so on up to $p-1$ are congruent, in some order, to $g^0$, $g^1$, up to $g^p-2$.
So modulo $p$ the terms in our sum are congruent to
$g^0$, $g^n$, $g^2n$, up to $g^(p-2)n$. Sum this geometric progression. We get $dfracg^(p-1)n-1g^n-1$. The numerator is congruent to $0$. There is no problem with the denominator, since $nlt p-1$.
If one prefers not to use fractions, equivalently note that
$$left(1+g^n+g^2n+cdots+g^(p-2)nright)(1-g^n)=1-g^(p-1)n.$$
The right-hand side is congruent to $0$. But $1-g^n$ is not congruent to $0$, and the result follows.
edited Oct 31 '12 at 13:28
answered Oct 31 '12 at 13:13
André Nicolas
447k36415793
447k36415793
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
Since the sets of reduced residue classes $1, 2, . . . , (p â 1)$ and $g, 2g, . . . , (p â 1)g$ are the same if $(g,p)=1$ the reason being:
if $r_1gequiv r_2gpmod p,$ where $1le r_1< r_2le p-1$
$implies r_1equiv r_2$ which is impossible, so $r_1gâ¢r_2gpmod p$.
So, $sum_1le xle p-1 x^n equiv sum_1le yle p-1 (gy)^n pmod p$
$implies pmid(g^n-1)sum_1le xle p-1 x^n $
If we take $g$ to be a primitive root, $pmid (g^n-1)iff phi(p)=(p-1)mid n$
Since $1le n<p-1,p$ can not divide $(g^n-1)implies sum_1le xle p-1 x^nequiv 0pmod p$
If $(p-1)mid n, sum_1le xle p-1 x^nequiv sum_1le xle p-11pmod p=p-1equiv -1pmod p $
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
Since the sets of reduced residue classes $1, 2, . . . , (p â 1)$ and $g, 2g, . . . , (p â 1)g$ are the same if $(g,p)=1$ the reason being:
if $r_1gequiv r_2gpmod p,$ where $1le r_1< r_2le p-1$
$implies r_1equiv r_2$ which is impossible, so $r_1gâ¢r_2gpmod p$.
So, $sum_1le xle p-1 x^n equiv sum_1le yle p-1 (gy)^n pmod p$
$implies pmid(g^n-1)sum_1le xle p-1 x^n $
If we take $g$ to be a primitive root, $pmid (g^n-1)iff phi(p)=(p-1)mid n$
Since $1le n<p-1,p$ can not divide $(g^n-1)implies sum_1le xle p-1 x^nequiv 0pmod p$
If $(p-1)mid n, sum_1le xle p-1 x^nequiv sum_1le xle p-11pmod p=p-1equiv -1pmod p $
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
up vote
6
down vote
Since the sets of reduced residue classes $1, 2, . . . , (p â 1)$ and $g, 2g, . . . , (p â 1)g$ are the same if $(g,p)=1$ the reason being:
if $r_1gequiv r_2gpmod p,$ where $1le r_1< r_2le p-1$
$implies r_1equiv r_2$ which is impossible, so $r_1gâ¢r_2gpmod p$.
So, $sum_1le xle p-1 x^n equiv sum_1le yle p-1 (gy)^n pmod p$
$implies pmid(g^n-1)sum_1le xle p-1 x^n $
If we take $g$ to be a primitive root, $pmid (g^n-1)iff phi(p)=(p-1)mid n$
Since $1le n<p-1,p$ can not divide $(g^n-1)implies sum_1le xle p-1 x^nequiv 0pmod p$
If $(p-1)mid n, sum_1le xle p-1 x^nequiv sum_1le xle p-11pmod p=p-1equiv -1pmod p $
Since the sets of reduced residue classes $1, 2, . . . , (p â 1)$ and $g, 2g, . . . , (p â 1)g$ are the same if $(g,p)=1$ the reason being:
if $r_1gequiv r_2gpmod p,$ where $1le r_1< r_2le p-1$
$implies r_1equiv r_2$ which is impossible, so $r_1gâ¢r_2gpmod p$.
So, $sum_1le xle p-1 x^n equiv sum_1le yle p-1 (gy)^n pmod p$
$implies pmid(g^n-1)sum_1le xle p-1 x^n $
If we take $g$ to be a primitive root, $pmid (g^n-1)iff phi(p)=(p-1)mid n$
Since $1le n<p-1,p$ can not divide $(g^n-1)implies sum_1le xle p-1 x^nequiv 0pmod p$
If $(p-1)mid n, sum_1le xle p-1 x^nequiv sum_1le xle p-11pmod p=p-1equiv -1pmod p $
edited Oct 31 '12 at 15:41
answered Oct 31 '12 at 13:17
lab bhattacharjee
216k14153266
216k14153266
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
Call
$$ p_n = sum_k=1^p k^n. $$
Since, by Fermat's little theorem, $p_nequiv p_n-p+1pmodp$ for all $n > p-1$, it is sufficient to show that
$$ forall nin[0,p-2],quad p_nequiv 0pmodp, $$
where the cases $n=0$ and $n=1$ are trivial. Since:
$$ x(x-1)cdotldotscdot(x-p+1)equiv x^p-xpmodp, $$
if $e_k(x_1,ldots,x_p)$ is the $k$-th elementary symmetric polynomial, we have:
$$ forall kin[0,p-2],quad e_k(1,ldots,p)equiv 0pmodp, $$
so, in virtue of Newton-Girard identities and induction we have:
$$forall kin[0,p-2],quad p_kequiv 0pmodp, $$
QED.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
Call
$$ p_n = sum_k=1^p k^n. $$
Since, by Fermat's little theorem, $p_nequiv p_n-p+1pmodp$ for all $n > p-1$, it is sufficient to show that
$$ forall nin[0,p-2],quad p_nequiv 0pmodp, $$
where the cases $n=0$ and $n=1$ are trivial. Since:
$$ x(x-1)cdotldotscdot(x-p+1)equiv x^p-xpmodp, $$
if $e_k(x_1,ldots,x_p)$ is the $k$-th elementary symmetric polynomial, we have:
$$ forall kin[0,p-2],quad e_k(1,ldots,p)equiv 0pmodp, $$
so, in virtue of Newton-Girard identities and induction we have:
$$forall kin[0,p-2],quad p_kequiv 0pmodp, $$
QED.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
Call
$$ p_n = sum_k=1^p k^n. $$
Since, by Fermat's little theorem, $p_nequiv p_n-p+1pmodp$ for all $n > p-1$, it is sufficient to show that
$$ forall nin[0,p-2],quad p_nequiv 0pmodp, $$
where the cases $n=0$ and $n=1$ are trivial. Since:
$$ x(x-1)cdotldotscdot(x-p+1)equiv x^p-xpmodp, $$
if $e_k(x_1,ldots,x_p)$ is the $k$-th elementary symmetric polynomial, we have:
$$ forall kin[0,p-2],quad e_k(1,ldots,p)equiv 0pmodp, $$
so, in virtue of Newton-Girard identities and induction we have:
$$forall kin[0,p-2],quad p_kequiv 0pmodp, $$
QED.
Call
$$ p_n = sum_k=1^p k^n. $$
Since, by Fermat's little theorem, $p_nequiv p_n-p+1pmodp$ for all $n > p-1$, it is sufficient to show that
$$ forall nin[0,p-2],quad p_nequiv 0pmodp, $$
where the cases $n=0$ and $n=1$ are trivial. Since:
$$ x(x-1)cdotldotscdot(x-p+1)equiv x^p-xpmodp, $$
if $e_k(x_1,ldots,x_p)$ is the $k$-th elementary symmetric polynomial, we have:
$$ forall kin[0,p-2],quad e_k(1,ldots,p)equiv 0pmodp, $$
so, in virtue of Newton-Girard identities and induction we have:
$$forall kin[0,p-2],quad p_kequiv 0pmodp, $$
QED.
edited Sep 10 at 13:54
darij grinberg
9,47132960
9,47132960
answered Oct 31 '12 at 13:18
Jack D'Aurizioâ¦
275k32268641
275k32268641
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
EDIT:This is a wrong answer($r^n equiv t^n pmod p not Rightarrow r equiv t pmod p$). See the comments.
For $n=1$ is correct.
Now for any $n in 1,2,ldots,p-2$ we have that $1,2,ldots,p-1equiv 1,2^n,ldots,(p-1)^n pmod p$ since $r^n equiv t^n pmod p iff r equiv t pmod p$. Hence $$sum_t=1^pt^n equiv sum_t=1^pt equiv 0 pmodp .$$
I don't thing the $equiv$ is true. For example, if $n=2$, the sequence $1,2^2,3^2,...,(p-1)^2$ only has $fracp-12$ distinct elements
â Thomas Andrews
Oct 31 '12 at 12:52
1
Sorry, but this isn't completely watertight. With $n = 2$ and $p = 5$, you get $1^2, 2^2, 3^2, 4^2 cong 1, 4, 4, 1$
â Arthur
Oct 31 '12 at 12:53
Note that $1^2equiv (p-1)^2pmod p$, but $1notequiv p-1pmod p$
â Thomas Andrews
Oct 31 '12 at 12:53
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
EDIT:This is a wrong answer($r^n equiv t^n pmod p not Rightarrow r equiv t pmod p$). See the comments.
For $n=1$ is correct.
Now for any $n in 1,2,ldots,p-2$ we have that $1,2,ldots,p-1equiv 1,2^n,ldots,(p-1)^n pmod p$ since $r^n equiv t^n pmod p iff r equiv t pmod p$. Hence $$sum_t=1^pt^n equiv sum_t=1^pt equiv 0 pmodp .$$
I don't thing the $equiv$ is true. For example, if $n=2$, the sequence $1,2^2,3^2,...,(p-1)^2$ only has $fracp-12$ distinct elements
â Thomas Andrews
Oct 31 '12 at 12:52
1
Sorry, but this isn't completely watertight. With $n = 2$ and $p = 5$, you get $1^2, 2^2, 3^2, 4^2 cong 1, 4, 4, 1$
â Arthur
Oct 31 '12 at 12:53
Note that $1^2equiv (p-1)^2pmod p$, but $1notequiv p-1pmod p$
â Thomas Andrews
Oct 31 '12 at 12:53
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
EDIT:This is a wrong answer($r^n equiv t^n pmod p not Rightarrow r equiv t pmod p$). See the comments.
For $n=1$ is correct.
Now for any $n in 1,2,ldots,p-2$ we have that $1,2,ldots,p-1equiv 1,2^n,ldots,(p-1)^n pmod p$ since $r^n equiv t^n pmod p iff r equiv t pmod p$. Hence $$sum_t=1^pt^n equiv sum_t=1^pt equiv 0 pmodp .$$
EDIT:This is a wrong answer($r^n equiv t^n pmod p not Rightarrow r equiv t pmod p$). See the comments.
For $n=1$ is correct.
Now for any $n in 1,2,ldots,p-2$ we have that $1,2,ldots,p-1equiv 1,2^n,ldots,(p-1)^n pmod p$ since $r^n equiv t^n pmod p iff r equiv t pmod p$. Hence $$sum_t=1^pt^n equiv sum_t=1^pt equiv 0 pmodp .$$
edited Oct 31 '12 at 13:12
answered Oct 31 '12 at 12:50
P..
13.2k22346
13.2k22346
I don't thing the $equiv$ is true. For example, if $n=2$, the sequence $1,2^2,3^2,...,(p-1)^2$ only has $fracp-12$ distinct elements
â Thomas Andrews
Oct 31 '12 at 12:52
1
Sorry, but this isn't completely watertight. With $n = 2$ and $p = 5$, you get $1^2, 2^2, 3^2, 4^2 cong 1, 4, 4, 1$
â Arthur
Oct 31 '12 at 12:53
Note that $1^2equiv (p-1)^2pmod p$, but $1notequiv p-1pmod p$
â Thomas Andrews
Oct 31 '12 at 12:53
add a comment |Â
I don't thing the $equiv$ is true. For example, if $n=2$, the sequence $1,2^2,3^2,...,(p-1)^2$ only has $fracp-12$ distinct elements
â Thomas Andrews
Oct 31 '12 at 12:52
1
Sorry, but this isn't completely watertight. With $n = 2$ and $p = 5$, you get $1^2, 2^2, 3^2, 4^2 cong 1, 4, 4, 1$
â Arthur
Oct 31 '12 at 12:53
Note that $1^2equiv (p-1)^2pmod p$, but $1notequiv p-1pmod p$
â Thomas Andrews
Oct 31 '12 at 12:53
I don't thing the $equiv$ is true. For example, if $n=2$, the sequence $1,2^2,3^2,...,(p-1)^2$ only has $fracp-12$ distinct elements
â Thomas Andrews
Oct 31 '12 at 12:52
I don't thing the $equiv$ is true. For example, if $n=2$, the sequence $1,2^2,3^2,...,(p-1)^2$ only has $fracp-12$ distinct elements
â Thomas Andrews
Oct 31 '12 at 12:52
1
1
Sorry, but this isn't completely watertight. With $n = 2$ and $p = 5$, you get $1^2, 2^2, 3^2, 4^2 cong 1, 4, 4, 1$
â Arthur
Oct 31 '12 at 12:53
Sorry, but this isn't completely watertight. With $n = 2$ and $p = 5$, you get $1^2, 2^2, 3^2, 4^2 cong 1, 4, 4, 1$
â Arthur
Oct 31 '12 at 12:53
Note that $1^2equiv (p-1)^2pmod p$, but $1notequiv p-1pmod p$
â Thomas Andrews
Oct 31 '12 at 12:53
Note that $1^2equiv (p-1)^2pmod p$, but $1notequiv p-1pmod p$
â Thomas Andrews
Oct 31 '12 at 12:53
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
WLOG assume $nk = p-1$ (if $n$ had factors coprime to $p-1$ they would just permute the sum, not change it's value, so remove them).
Put $S = (mathbb Z/pmathbb Z)^times$ and let $S^n$ denote the subgroup $ s in S $. The kernel of the map $S to S^n$ is the set of solutions of $z^n=1$ so $n|S^n| = |S|$. Details about subgroup here
This tells us that (mod p) the sum is equal to $n$ times the sum of the elements of $S^n$ so we just need to show that $$sum_s in S^ns equiv 0 pmod p$$ but since this is the set of solutions of $z^n-1=0$ by Vieta's formula they sum to $0$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
WLOG assume $nk = p-1$ (if $n$ had factors coprime to $p-1$ they would just permute the sum, not change it's value, so remove them).
Put $S = (mathbb Z/pmathbb Z)^times$ and let $S^n$ denote the subgroup $ s in S $. The kernel of the map $S to S^n$ is the set of solutions of $z^n=1$ so $n|S^n| = |S|$. Details about subgroup here
This tells us that (mod p) the sum is equal to $n$ times the sum of the elements of $S^n$ so we just need to show that $$sum_s in S^ns equiv 0 pmod p$$ but since this is the set of solutions of $z^n-1=0$ by Vieta's formula they sum to $0$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
WLOG assume $nk = p-1$ (if $n$ had factors coprime to $p-1$ they would just permute the sum, not change it's value, so remove them).
Put $S = (mathbb Z/pmathbb Z)^times$ and let $S^n$ denote the subgroup $ s in S $. The kernel of the map $S to S^n$ is the set of solutions of $z^n=1$ so $n|S^n| = |S|$. Details about subgroup here
This tells us that (mod p) the sum is equal to $n$ times the sum of the elements of $S^n$ so we just need to show that $$sum_s in S^ns equiv 0 pmod p$$ but since this is the set of solutions of $z^n-1=0$ by Vieta's formula they sum to $0$.
WLOG assume $nk = p-1$ (if $n$ had factors coprime to $p-1$ they would just permute the sum, not change it's value, so remove them).
Put $S = (mathbb Z/pmathbb Z)^times$ and let $S^n$ denote the subgroup $ s in S $. The kernel of the map $S to S^n$ is the set of solutions of $z^n=1$ so $n|S^n| = |S|$. Details about subgroup here
This tells us that (mod p) the sum is equal to $n$ times the sum of the elements of $S^n$ so we just need to show that $$sum_s in S^ns equiv 0 pmod p$$ but since this is the set of solutions of $z^n-1=0$ by Vieta's formula they sum to $0$.
answered Oct 31 '12 at 13:59
sperners lemma
1,415929
1,415929
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f226023%2fcongruence-modulo-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password