Proof about a theorem that says a function is continuous if only if f is right continuous in a and left continuous.

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Theorem:



A function $f:Dto mathbb R$ is continuous in $ain D$ $iff f$ is left and right continuous in $a$.



Proof:



I firstly thought just to write down the definitions of left and right continuous and then it trivially shows the theorem. But apparently it isn't sufficient.



Let $f:Dtomathbb R$ and consider $ain D$. The function $f$ is rightcontinuous in $a iff$ $$(forallepsilongt 0)(existsdeltagt 0)(ale xlt a+deltaRightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon)$$



and left continous $iff$
$a iff$ $$(forallepsilongt 0)(existsdeltagt 0)(a -deltalt xle aRightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon)$$



So I found a proof online on this webpage.




My question is there another way to prove this maybe with the use of my definitions? I'd most appreciate it.








share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    Hint: Let $varepsilon > 0$ and choose $delta = min delta_1 , delta_2 $.
    – Gonzalo Benavides
    Aug 24 at 11:06







  • 1




    And then use $delta_1$ for RC and $delta_2$ for LC? Ok, then. Let's say I replace them with that. How can I logically combine those too?
    – Anonymous I
    Aug 24 at 11:14







  • 1




    So RC would become $(forallepsilongt 0)(existsdelta_1gt 0)(ale xlt a+delta_1Rightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon)$ and LC is $(forallepsilongt 0)(existsdelta_2gt 0)(a-delta_2lt xle aRightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon)$. Why should you choose for the min of those $delta$'s?
    – Anonymous I
    Aug 24 at 11:23















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Theorem:



A function $f:Dto mathbb R$ is continuous in $ain D$ $iff f$ is left and right continuous in $a$.



Proof:



I firstly thought just to write down the definitions of left and right continuous and then it trivially shows the theorem. But apparently it isn't sufficient.



Let $f:Dtomathbb R$ and consider $ain D$. The function $f$ is rightcontinuous in $a iff$ $$(forallepsilongt 0)(existsdeltagt 0)(ale xlt a+deltaRightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon)$$



and left continous $iff$
$a iff$ $$(forallepsilongt 0)(existsdeltagt 0)(a -deltalt xle aRightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon)$$



So I found a proof online on this webpage.




My question is there another way to prove this maybe with the use of my definitions? I'd most appreciate it.








share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    Hint: Let $varepsilon > 0$ and choose $delta = min delta_1 , delta_2 $.
    – Gonzalo Benavides
    Aug 24 at 11:06







  • 1




    And then use $delta_1$ for RC and $delta_2$ for LC? Ok, then. Let's say I replace them with that. How can I logically combine those too?
    – Anonymous I
    Aug 24 at 11:14







  • 1




    So RC would become $(forallepsilongt 0)(existsdelta_1gt 0)(ale xlt a+delta_1Rightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon)$ and LC is $(forallepsilongt 0)(existsdelta_2gt 0)(a-delta_2lt xle aRightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon)$. Why should you choose for the min of those $delta$'s?
    – Anonymous I
    Aug 24 at 11:23













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











Theorem:



A function $f:Dto mathbb R$ is continuous in $ain D$ $iff f$ is left and right continuous in $a$.



Proof:



I firstly thought just to write down the definitions of left and right continuous and then it trivially shows the theorem. But apparently it isn't sufficient.



Let $f:Dtomathbb R$ and consider $ain D$. The function $f$ is rightcontinuous in $a iff$ $$(forallepsilongt 0)(existsdeltagt 0)(ale xlt a+deltaRightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon)$$



and left continous $iff$
$a iff$ $$(forallepsilongt 0)(existsdeltagt 0)(a -deltalt xle aRightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon)$$



So I found a proof online on this webpage.




My question is there another way to prove this maybe with the use of my definitions? I'd most appreciate it.








share|cite|improve this question














Theorem:



A function $f:Dto mathbb R$ is continuous in $ain D$ $iff f$ is left and right continuous in $a$.



Proof:



I firstly thought just to write down the definitions of left and right continuous and then it trivially shows the theorem. But apparently it isn't sufficient.



Let $f:Dtomathbb R$ and consider $ain D$. The function $f$ is rightcontinuous in $a iff$ $$(forallepsilongt 0)(existsdeltagt 0)(ale xlt a+deltaRightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon)$$



and left continous $iff$
$a iff$ $$(forallepsilongt 0)(existsdeltagt 0)(a -deltalt xle aRightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon)$$



So I found a proof online on this webpage.




My question is there another way to prove this maybe with the use of my definitions? I'd most appreciate it.










share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 24 at 11:10

























asked Aug 24 at 10:38









Anonymous I

8351725




8351725







  • 1




    Hint: Let $varepsilon > 0$ and choose $delta = min delta_1 , delta_2 $.
    – Gonzalo Benavides
    Aug 24 at 11:06







  • 1




    And then use $delta_1$ for RC and $delta_2$ for LC? Ok, then. Let's say I replace them with that. How can I logically combine those too?
    – Anonymous I
    Aug 24 at 11:14







  • 1




    So RC would become $(forallepsilongt 0)(existsdelta_1gt 0)(ale xlt a+delta_1Rightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon)$ and LC is $(forallepsilongt 0)(existsdelta_2gt 0)(a-delta_2lt xle aRightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon)$. Why should you choose for the min of those $delta$'s?
    – Anonymous I
    Aug 24 at 11:23













  • 1




    Hint: Let $varepsilon > 0$ and choose $delta = min delta_1 , delta_2 $.
    – Gonzalo Benavides
    Aug 24 at 11:06







  • 1




    And then use $delta_1$ for RC and $delta_2$ for LC? Ok, then. Let's say I replace them with that. How can I logically combine those too?
    – Anonymous I
    Aug 24 at 11:14







  • 1




    So RC would become $(forallepsilongt 0)(existsdelta_1gt 0)(ale xlt a+delta_1Rightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon)$ and LC is $(forallepsilongt 0)(existsdelta_2gt 0)(a-delta_2lt xle aRightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon)$. Why should you choose for the min of those $delta$'s?
    – Anonymous I
    Aug 24 at 11:23








1




1




Hint: Let $varepsilon > 0$ and choose $delta = min delta_1 , delta_2 $.
– Gonzalo Benavides
Aug 24 at 11:06





Hint: Let $varepsilon > 0$ and choose $delta = min delta_1 , delta_2 $.
– Gonzalo Benavides
Aug 24 at 11:06





1




1




And then use $delta_1$ for RC and $delta_2$ for LC? Ok, then. Let's say I replace them with that. How can I logically combine those too?
– Anonymous I
Aug 24 at 11:14





And then use $delta_1$ for RC and $delta_2$ for LC? Ok, then. Let's say I replace them with that. How can I logically combine those too?
– Anonymous I
Aug 24 at 11:14





1




1




So RC would become $(forallepsilongt 0)(existsdelta_1gt 0)(ale xlt a+delta_1Rightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon)$ and LC is $(forallepsilongt 0)(existsdelta_2gt 0)(a-delta_2lt xle aRightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon)$. Why should you choose for the min of those $delta$'s?
– Anonymous I
Aug 24 at 11:23





So RC would become $(forallepsilongt 0)(existsdelta_1gt 0)(ale xlt a+delta_1Rightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon)$ and LC is $(forallepsilongt 0)(existsdelta_2gt 0)(a-delta_2lt xle aRightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon)$. Why should you choose for the min of those $delta$'s?
– Anonymous I
Aug 24 at 11:23











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










We show that if $f$ is left and right continuous, it is continuous. (The other direction is easier, can you do it?)



Let $f$ be left and right continuous at $a$. Let $epsilon>0$. There are $delta_l>0$ and $delta_r>0$ with $a-delta_l<xle aLongrightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|<epsilon$ and $ale x <a+delta_rLongrightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|<epsilon$.



Now as the hint said, choose $delta=min(delta_l,delta_r)$. Then if $|x-a|<delta$, either $xle a$ or $xge a$. In the first case, $x>a-delta>a-delta_l$ and so $|f(x)-f(a)|<epsilon$. In the second case, $x<a+delta<a+delta_r$ and so $|f(x)-f(a)|<epsilon$ and the function is continuous.



The textbook solution you showed uses an equivalent characterisation of convergence using sequences.






share|cite|improve this answer
















  • 1




    Well I don't know how can I do the other direction besides the stuff I've already posted.
    – Anonymous I
    Aug 24 at 21:33

















up vote
1
down vote













@Kusma:



$fbox $Rightarrow$$:



Let $f$ be continuous in $a$. Let $epsilongt 0$. Then there exists a $deltagt 0$, so $|x-a|ltdeltaLongrightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon$



So to divide this into LC and RC we choose a $delta:= min(delta_1,delta_2)$. Then because of $|x-a|ltdelta$ this implies that $xle a$ or $xge a$ and we have $xgt a-deltagt a-delta_1$ and so $|f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon$ for LC.



The other case is $xlt a+deltalt a+delta_2$ and so $|f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon$ for RC.



Which will give us the definitions for LC and RC above.



Is this correct?






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Can I assume the upvoter is you,@Kusma?
    – Anonymous I
    Aug 25 at 12:38










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2892988%2fproof-about-a-theorem-that-says-a-function-is-continuous-if-only-if-f-is-right-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
2
down vote



accepted










We show that if $f$ is left and right continuous, it is continuous. (The other direction is easier, can you do it?)



Let $f$ be left and right continuous at $a$. Let $epsilon>0$. There are $delta_l>0$ and $delta_r>0$ with $a-delta_l<xle aLongrightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|<epsilon$ and $ale x <a+delta_rLongrightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|<epsilon$.



Now as the hint said, choose $delta=min(delta_l,delta_r)$. Then if $|x-a|<delta$, either $xle a$ or $xge a$. In the first case, $x>a-delta>a-delta_l$ and so $|f(x)-f(a)|<epsilon$. In the second case, $x<a+delta<a+delta_r$ and so $|f(x)-f(a)|<epsilon$ and the function is continuous.



The textbook solution you showed uses an equivalent characterisation of convergence using sequences.






share|cite|improve this answer
















  • 1




    Well I don't know how can I do the other direction besides the stuff I've already posted.
    – Anonymous I
    Aug 24 at 21:33














up vote
2
down vote



accepted










We show that if $f$ is left and right continuous, it is continuous. (The other direction is easier, can you do it?)



Let $f$ be left and right continuous at $a$. Let $epsilon>0$. There are $delta_l>0$ and $delta_r>0$ with $a-delta_l<xle aLongrightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|<epsilon$ and $ale x <a+delta_rLongrightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|<epsilon$.



Now as the hint said, choose $delta=min(delta_l,delta_r)$. Then if $|x-a|<delta$, either $xle a$ or $xge a$. In the first case, $x>a-delta>a-delta_l$ and so $|f(x)-f(a)|<epsilon$. In the second case, $x<a+delta<a+delta_r$ and so $|f(x)-f(a)|<epsilon$ and the function is continuous.



The textbook solution you showed uses an equivalent characterisation of convergence using sequences.






share|cite|improve this answer
















  • 1




    Well I don't know how can I do the other direction besides the stuff I've already posted.
    – Anonymous I
    Aug 24 at 21:33












up vote
2
down vote



accepted







up vote
2
down vote



accepted






We show that if $f$ is left and right continuous, it is continuous. (The other direction is easier, can you do it?)



Let $f$ be left and right continuous at $a$. Let $epsilon>0$. There are $delta_l>0$ and $delta_r>0$ with $a-delta_l<xle aLongrightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|<epsilon$ and $ale x <a+delta_rLongrightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|<epsilon$.



Now as the hint said, choose $delta=min(delta_l,delta_r)$. Then if $|x-a|<delta$, either $xle a$ or $xge a$. In the first case, $x>a-delta>a-delta_l$ and so $|f(x)-f(a)|<epsilon$. In the second case, $x<a+delta<a+delta_r$ and so $|f(x)-f(a)|<epsilon$ and the function is continuous.



The textbook solution you showed uses an equivalent characterisation of convergence using sequences.






share|cite|improve this answer












We show that if $f$ is left and right continuous, it is continuous. (The other direction is easier, can you do it?)



Let $f$ be left and right continuous at $a$. Let $epsilon>0$. There are $delta_l>0$ and $delta_r>0$ with $a-delta_l<xle aLongrightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|<epsilon$ and $ale x <a+delta_rLongrightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|<epsilon$.



Now as the hint said, choose $delta=min(delta_l,delta_r)$. Then if $|x-a|<delta$, either $xle a$ or $xge a$. In the first case, $x>a-delta>a-delta_l$ and so $|f(x)-f(a)|<epsilon$. In the second case, $x<a+delta<a+delta_r$ and so $|f(x)-f(a)|<epsilon$ and the function is continuous.



The textbook solution you showed uses an equivalent characterisation of convergence using sequences.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Aug 24 at 13:52









Kusma

2,697214




2,697214







  • 1




    Well I don't know how can I do the other direction besides the stuff I've already posted.
    – Anonymous I
    Aug 24 at 21:33












  • 1




    Well I don't know how can I do the other direction besides the stuff I've already posted.
    – Anonymous I
    Aug 24 at 21:33







1




1




Well I don't know how can I do the other direction besides the stuff I've already posted.
– Anonymous I
Aug 24 at 21:33




Well I don't know how can I do the other direction besides the stuff I've already posted.
– Anonymous I
Aug 24 at 21:33










up vote
1
down vote













@Kusma:



$fbox $Rightarrow$$:



Let $f$ be continuous in $a$. Let $epsilongt 0$. Then there exists a $deltagt 0$, so $|x-a|ltdeltaLongrightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon$



So to divide this into LC and RC we choose a $delta:= min(delta_1,delta_2)$. Then because of $|x-a|ltdelta$ this implies that $xle a$ or $xge a$ and we have $xgt a-deltagt a-delta_1$ and so $|f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon$ for LC.



The other case is $xlt a+deltalt a+delta_2$ and so $|f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon$ for RC.



Which will give us the definitions for LC and RC above.



Is this correct?






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Can I assume the upvoter is you,@Kusma?
    – Anonymous I
    Aug 25 at 12:38














up vote
1
down vote













@Kusma:



$fbox $Rightarrow$$:



Let $f$ be continuous in $a$. Let $epsilongt 0$. Then there exists a $deltagt 0$, so $|x-a|ltdeltaLongrightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon$



So to divide this into LC and RC we choose a $delta:= min(delta_1,delta_2)$. Then because of $|x-a|ltdelta$ this implies that $xle a$ or $xge a$ and we have $xgt a-deltagt a-delta_1$ and so $|f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon$ for LC.



The other case is $xlt a+deltalt a+delta_2$ and so $|f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon$ for RC.



Which will give us the definitions for LC and RC above.



Is this correct?






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Can I assume the upvoter is you,@Kusma?
    – Anonymous I
    Aug 25 at 12:38












up vote
1
down vote










up vote
1
down vote









@Kusma:



$fbox $Rightarrow$$:



Let $f$ be continuous in $a$. Let $epsilongt 0$. Then there exists a $deltagt 0$, so $|x-a|ltdeltaLongrightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon$



So to divide this into LC and RC we choose a $delta:= min(delta_1,delta_2)$. Then because of $|x-a|ltdelta$ this implies that $xle a$ or $xge a$ and we have $xgt a-deltagt a-delta_1$ and so $|f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon$ for LC.



The other case is $xlt a+deltalt a+delta_2$ and so $|f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon$ for RC.



Which will give us the definitions for LC and RC above.



Is this correct?






share|cite|improve this answer












@Kusma:



$fbox $Rightarrow$$:



Let $f$ be continuous in $a$. Let $epsilongt 0$. Then there exists a $deltagt 0$, so $|x-a|ltdeltaLongrightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon$



So to divide this into LC and RC we choose a $delta:= min(delta_1,delta_2)$. Then because of $|x-a|ltdelta$ this implies that $xle a$ or $xge a$ and we have $xgt a-deltagt a-delta_1$ and so $|f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon$ for LC.



The other case is $xlt a+deltalt a+delta_2$ and so $|f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon$ for RC.



Which will give us the definitions for LC and RC above.



Is this correct?







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Aug 25 at 12:32









Anonymous I

8351725




8351725











  • Can I assume the upvoter is you,@Kusma?
    – Anonymous I
    Aug 25 at 12:38
















  • Can I assume the upvoter is you,@Kusma?
    – Anonymous I
    Aug 25 at 12:38















Can I assume the upvoter is you,@Kusma?
– Anonymous I
Aug 25 at 12:38




Can I assume the upvoter is you,@Kusma?
– Anonymous I
Aug 25 at 12:38

















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2892988%2fproof-about-a-theorem-that-says-a-function-is-continuous-if-only-if-f-is-right-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

Mutual Information Always Non-negative

Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?