Proof about a theorem that says a function is continuous if only if f is right continuous in a and left continuous.
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Theorem:
A function $f:Dto mathbb R$ is continuous in $ain D$ $iff f$ is left and right continuous in $a$.
Proof:
I firstly thought just to write down the definitions of left and right continuous and then it trivially shows the theorem. But apparently it isn't sufficient.
Let $f:Dtomathbb R$ and consider $ain D$. The function $f$ is rightcontinuous in $a iff$ $$(forallepsilongt 0)(existsdeltagt 0)(ale xlt a+deltaRightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon)$$
and left continous $iff$
$a iff$ $$(forallepsilongt 0)(existsdeltagt 0)(a -deltalt xle aRightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon)$$
So I found a proof online on this webpage.
My question is there another way to prove this maybe with the use of my definitions? I'd most appreciate it.
calculus proof-writing alternative-proof epsilon-delta
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Theorem:
A function $f:Dto mathbb R$ is continuous in $ain D$ $iff f$ is left and right continuous in $a$.
Proof:
I firstly thought just to write down the definitions of left and right continuous and then it trivially shows the theorem. But apparently it isn't sufficient.
Let $f:Dtomathbb R$ and consider $ain D$. The function $f$ is rightcontinuous in $a iff$ $$(forallepsilongt 0)(existsdeltagt 0)(ale xlt a+deltaRightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon)$$
and left continous $iff$
$a iff$ $$(forallepsilongt 0)(existsdeltagt 0)(a -deltalt xle aRightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon)$$
So I found a proof online on this webpage.
My question is there another way to prove this maybe with the use of my definitions? I'd most appreciate it.
calculus proof-writing alternative-proof epsilon-delta
1
Hint: Let $varepsilon > 0$ and choose $delta = min delta_1 , delta_2 $.
â Gonzalo Benavides
Aug 24 at 11:06
1
And then use $delta_1$ for RC and $delta_2$ for LC? Ok, then. Let's say I replace them with that. How can I logically combine those too?
â Anonymous I
Aug 24 at 11:14
1
So RC would become $(forallepsilongt 0)(existsdelta_1gt 0)(ale xlt a+delta_1Rightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon)$ and LC is $(forallepsilongt 0)(existsdelta_2gt 0)(a-delta_2lt xle aRightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon)$. Why should you choose for the min of those $delta$'s?
â Anonymous I
Aug 24 at 11:23
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Theorem:
A function $f:Dto mathbb R$ is continuous in $ain D$ $iff f$ is left and right continuous in $a$.
Proof:
I firstly thought just to write down the definitions of left and right continuous and then it trivially shows the theorem. But apparently it isn't sufficient.
Let $f:Dtomathbb R$ and consider $ain D$. The function $f$ is rightcontinuous in $a iff$ $$(forallepsilongt 0)(existsdeltagt 0)(ale xlt a+deltaRightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon)$$
and left continous $iff$
$a iff$ $$(forallepsilongt 0)(existsdeltagt 0)(a -deltalt xle aRightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon)$$
So I found a proof online on this webpage.
My question is there another way to prove this maybe with the use of my definitions? I'd most appreciate it.
calculus proof-writing alternative-proof epsilon-delta
Theorem:
A function $f:Dto mathbb R$ is continuous in $ain D$ $iff f$ is left and right continuous in $a$.
Proof:
I firstly thought just to write down the definitions of left and right continuous and then it trivially shows the theorem. But apparently it isn't sufficient.
Let $f:Dtomathbb R$ and consider $ain D$. The function $f$ is rightcontinuous in $a iff$ $$(forallepsilongt 0)(existsdeltagt 0)(ale xlt a+deltaRightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon)$$
and left continous $iff$
$a iff$ $$(forallepsilongt 0)(existsdeltagt 0)(a -deltalt xle aRightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon)$$
So I found a proof online on this webpage.
My question is there another way to prove this maybe with the use of my definitions? I'd most appreciate it.
calculus proof-writing alternative-proof epsilon-delta
edited Aug 24 at 11:10
asked Aug 24 at 10:38
Anonymous I
8351725
8351725
1
Hint: Let $varepsilon > 0$ and choose $delta = min delta_1 , delta_2 $.
â Gonzalo Benavides
Aug 24 at 11:06
1
And then use $delta_1$ for RC and $delta_2$ for LC? Ok, then. Let's say I replace them with that. How can I logically combine those too?
â Anonymous I
Aug 24 at 11:14
1
So RC would become $(forallepsilongt 0)(existsdelta_1gt 0)(ale xlt a+delta_1Rightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon)$ and LC is $(forallepsilongt 0)(existsdelta_2gt 0)(a-delta_2lt xle aRightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon)$. Why should you choose for the min of those $delta$'s?
â Anonymous I
Aug 24 at 11:23
add a comment |Â
1
Hint: Let $varepsilon > 0$ and choose $delta = min delta_1 , delta_2 $.
â Gonzalo Benavides
Aug 24 at 11:06
1
And then use $delta_1$ for RC and $delta_2$ for LC? Ok, then. Let's say I replace them with that. How can I logically combine those too?
â Anonymous I
Aug 24 at 11:14
1
So RC would become $(forallepsilongt 0)(existsdelta_1gt 0)(ale xlt a+delta_1Rightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon)$ and LC is $(forallepsilongt 0)(existsdelta_2gt 0)(a-delta_2lt xle aRightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon)$. Why should you choose for the min of those $delta$'s?
â Anonymous I
Aug 24 at 11:23
1
1
Hint: Let $varepsilon > 0$ and choose $delta = min delta_1 , delta_2 $.
â Gonzalo Benavides
Aug 24 at 11:06
Hint: Let $varepsilon > 0$ and choose $delta = min delta_1 , delta_2 $.
â Gonzalo Benavides
Aug 24 at 11:06
1
1
And then use $delta_1$ for RC and $delta_2$ for LC? Ok, then. Let's say I replace them with that. How can I logically combine those too?
â Anonymous I
Aug 24 at 11:14
And then use $delta_1$ for RC and $delta_2$ for LC? Ok, then. Let's say I replace them with that. How can I logically combine those too?
â Anonymous I
Aug 24 at 11:14
1
1
So RC would become $(forallepsilongt 0)(existsdelta_1gt 0)(ale xlt a+delta_1Rightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon)$ and LC is $(forallepsilongt 0)(existsdelta_2gt 0)(a-delta_2lt xle aRightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon)$. Why should you choose for the min of those $delta$'s?
â Anonymous I
Aug 24 at 11:23
So RC would become $(forallepsilongt 0)(existsdelta_1gt 0)(ale xlt a+delta_1Rightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon)$ and LC is $(forallepsilongt 0)(existsdelta_2gt 0)(a-delta_2lt xle aRightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon)$. Why should you choose for the min of those $delta$'s?
â Anonymous I
Aug 24 at 11:23
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
We show that if $f$ is left and right continuous, it is continuous. (The other direction is easier, can you do it?)
Let $f$ be left and right continuous at $a$. Let $epsilon>0$. There are $delta_l>0$ and $delta_r>0$ with $a-delta_l<xle aLongrightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|<epsilon$ and $ale x <a+delta_rLongrightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|<epsilon$.
Now as the hint said, choose $delta=min(delta_l,delta_r)$. Then if $|x-a|<delta$, either $xle a$ or $xge a$. In the first case, $x>a-delta>a-delta_l$ and so $|f(x)-f(a)|<epsilon$. In the second case, $x<a+delta<a+delta_r$ and so $|f(x)-f(a)|<epsilon$ and the function is continuous.
The textbook solution you showed uses an equivalent characterisation of convergence using sequences.
1
Well I don't know how can I do the other direction besides the stuff I've already posted.
â Anonymous I
Aug 24 at 21:33
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
@Kusma:
$fbox $Rightarrow$$:
Let $f$ be continuous in $a$. Let $epsilongt 0$. Then there exists a $deltagt 0$, so $|x-a|ltdeltaLongrightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon$
So to divide this into LC and RC we choose a $delta:= min(delta_1,delta_2)$. Then because of $|x-a|ltdelta$ this implies that $xle a$ or $xge a$ and we have $xgt a-deltagt a-delta_1$ and so $|f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon$ for LC.
The other case is $xlt a+deltalt a+delta_2$ and so $|f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon$ for RC.
Which will give us the definitions for LC and RC above.
Is this correct?
Can I assume the upvoter is you,@Kusma?
â Anonymous I
Aug 25 at 12:38
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
We show that if $f$ is left and right continuous, it is continuous. (The other direction is easier, can you do it?)
Let $f$ be left and right continuous at $a$. Let $epsilon>0$. There are $delta_l>0$ and $delta_r>0$ with $a-delta_l<xle aLongrightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|<epsilon$ and $ale x <a+delta_rLongrightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|<epsilon$.
Now as the hint said, choose $delta=min(delta_l,delta_r)$. Then if $|x-a|<delta$, either $xle a$ or $xge a$. In the first case, $x>a-delta>a-delta_l$ and so $|f(x)-f(a)|<epsilon$. In the second case, $x<a+delta<a+delta_r$ and so $|f(x)-f(a)|<epsilon$ and the function is continuous.
The textbook solution you showed uses an equivalent characterisation of convergence using sequences.
1
Well I don't know how can I do the other direction besides the stuff I've already posted.
â Anonymous I
Aug 24 at 21:33
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
We show that if $f$ is left and right continuous, it is continuous. (The other direction is easier, can you do it?)
Let $f$ be left and right continuous at $a$. Let $epsilon>0$. There are $delta_l>0$ and $delta_r>0$ with $a-delta_l<xle aLongrightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|<epsilon$ and $ale x <a+delta_rLongrightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|<epsilon$.
Now as the hint said, choose $delta=min(delta_l,delta_r)$. Then if $|x-a|<delta$, either $xle a$ or $xge a$. In the first case, $x>a-delta>a-delta_l$ and so $|f(x)-f(a)|<epsilon$. In the second case, $x<a+delta<a+delta_r$ and so $|f(x)-f(a)|<epsilon$ and the function is continuous.
The textbook solution you showed uses an equivalent characterisation of convergence using sequences.
1
Well I don't know how can I do the other direction besides the stuff I've already posted.
â Anonymous I
Aug 24 at 21:33
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
We show that if $f$ is left and right continuous, it is continuous. (The other direction is easier, can you do it?)
Let $f$ be left and right continuous at $a$. Let $epsilon>0$. There are $delta_l>0$ and $delta_r>0$ with $a-delta_l<xle aLongrightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|<epsilon$ and $ale x <a+delta_rLongrightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|<epsilon$.
Now as the hint said, choose $delta=min(delta_l,delta_r)$. Then if $|x-a|<delta$, either $xle a$ or $xge a$. In the first case, $x>a-delta>a-delta_l$ and so $|f(x)-f(a)|<epsilon$. In the second case, $x<a+delta<a+delta_r$ and so $|f(x)-f(a)|<epsilon$ and the function is continuous.
The textbook solution you showed uses an equivalent characterisation of convergence using sequences.
We show that if $f$ is left and right continuous, it is continuous. (The other direction is easier, can you do it?)
Let $f$ be left and right continuous at $a$. Let $epsilon>0$. There are $delta_l>0$ and $delta_r>0$ with $a-delta_l<xle aLongrightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|<epsilon$ and $ale x <a+delta_rLongrightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|<epsilon$.
Now as the hint said, choose $delta=min(delta_l,delta_r)$. Then if $|x-a|<delta$, either $xle a$ or $xge a$. In the first case, $x>a-delta>a-delta_l$ and so $|f(x)-f(a)|<epsilon$. In the second case, $x<a+delta<a+delta_r$ and so $|f(x)-f(a)|<epsilon$ and the function is continuous.
The textbook solution you showed uses an equivalent characterisation of convergence using sequences.
answered Aug 24 at 13:52
Kusma
2,697214
2,697214
1
Well I don't know how can I do the other direction besides the stuff I've already posted.
â Anonymous I
Aug 24 at 21:33
add a comment |Â
1
Well I don't know how can I do the other direction besides the stuff I've already posted.
â Anonymous I
Aug 24 at 21:33
1
1
Well I don't know how can I do the other direction besides the stuff I've already posted.
â Anonymous I
Aug 24 at 21:33
Well I don't know how can I do the other direction besides the stuff I've already posted.
â Anonymous I
Aug 24 at 21:33
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
@Kusma:
$fbox $Rightarrow$$:
Let $f$ be continuous in $a$. Let $epsilongt 0$. Then there exists a $deltagt 0$, so $|x-a|ltdeltaLongrightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon$
So to divide this into LC and RC we choose a $delta:= min(delta_1,delta_2)$. Then because of $|x-a|ltdelta$ this implies that $xle a$ or $xge a$ and we have $xgt a-deltagt a-delta_1$ and so $|f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon$ for LC.
The other case is $xlt a+deltalt a+delta_2$ and so $|f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon$ for RC.
Which will give us the definitions for LC and RC above.
Is this correct?
Can I assume the upvoter is you,@Kusma?
â Anonymous I
Aug 25 at 12:38
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
@Kusma:
$fbox $Rightarrow$$:
Let $f$ be continuous in $a$. Let $epsilongt 0$. Then there exists a $deltagt 0$, so $|x-a|ltdeltaLongrightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon$
So to divide this into LC and RC we choose a $delta:= min(delta_1,delta_2)$. Then because of $|x-a|ltdelta$ this implies that $xle a$ or $xge a$ and we have $xgt a-deltagt a-delta_1$ and so $|f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon$ for LC.
The other case is $xlt a+deltalt a+delta_2$ and so $|f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon$ for RC.
Which will give us the definitions for LC and RC above.
Is this correct?
Can I assume the upvoter is you,@Kusma?
â Anonymous I
Aug 25 at 12:38
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
@Kusma:
$fbox $Rightarrow$$:
Let $f$ be continuous in $a$. Let $epsilongt 0$. Then there exists a $deltagt 0$, so $|x-a|ltdeltaLongrightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon$
So to divide this into LC and RC we choose a $delta:= min(delta_1,delta_2)$. Then because of $|x-a|ltdelta$ this implies that $xle a$ or $xge a$ and we have $xgt a-deltagt a-delta_1$ and so $|f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon$ for LC.
The other case is $xlt a+deltalt a+delta_2$ and so $|f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon$ for RC.
Which will give us the definitions for LC and RC above.
Is this correct?
@Kusma:
$fbox $Rightarrow$$:
Let $f$ be continuous in $a$. Let $epsilongt 0$. Then there exists a $deltagt 0$, so $|x-a|ltdeltaLongrightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon$
So to divide this into LC and RC we choose a $delta:= min(delta_1,delta_2)$. Then because of $|x-a|ltdelta$ this implies that $xle a$ or $xge a$ and we have $xgt a-deltagt a-delta_1$ and so $|f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon$ for LC.
The other case is $xlt a+deltalt a+delta_2$ and so $|f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon$ for RC.
Which will give us the definitions for LC and RC above.
Is this correct?
answered Aug 25 at 12:32
Anonymous I
8351725
8351725
Can I assume the upvoter is you,@Kusma?
â Anonymous I
Aug 25 at 12:38
add a comment |Â
Can I assume the upvoter is you,@Kusma?
â Anonymous I
Aug 25 at 12:38
Can I assume the upvoter is you,@Kusma?
â Anonymous I
Aug 25 at 12:38
Can I assume the upvoter is you,@Kusma?
â Anonymous I
Aug 25 at 12:38
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2892988%2fproof-about-a-theorem-that-says-a-function-is-continuous-if-only-if-f-is-right-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
1
Hint: Let $varepsilon > 0$ and choose $delta = min delta_1 , delta_2 $.
â Gonzalo Benavides
Aug 24 at 11:06
1
And then use $delta_1$ for RC and $delta_2$ for LC? Ok, then. Let's say I replace them with that. How can I logically combine those too?
â Anonymous I
Aug 24 at 11:14
1
So RC would become $(forallepsilongt 0)(existsdelta_1gt 0)(ale xlt a+delta_1Rightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon)$ and LC is $(forallepsilongt 0)(existsdelta_2gt 0)(a-delta_2lt xle aRightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|ltepsilon)$. Why should you choose for the min of those $delta$'s?
â Anonymous I
Aug 24 at 11:23