Let $g:BbbR^2toBbbR^2,;(x,y)mapsto g(x,y)=(x+f(y),y+f(x)).$ Prove that $g(BbbR^2)$ is clopen in $BbbR^2.$

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
3












Let $f:BbbRtoBbbR$ be a $C^1$ function. Let $$g:BbbR^2toBbbR^2$$
$$(x,y)mapsto g(x,y)=(x+f(y),y+f(x)).$$
Suppose $suplimits_xinBbbR|f'(x)|<1.$



$i.)$ Prove that $forall;(x_0,y_0)in BbbR^2,;;g'(x_0,y_0)in ISO(BbbR^2)$



$ii.)$Prove that $g$ is one-one



$iii.)$Prove that $g(BbbR^2)$ is clopen in $BbbR^2.$



$iv.)$Conclude



Part $i.)$ and $ii.)$ are not problems at all. I have been able to show that $g(BbbR^2)$ is open by Local Inverse Mapping Theorem. So, I want to show that it is closed.



MY WORK:



It suffices to show that $overlineg(BbbR^2)subset g(BbbR^2).$



Let $(t,z)in overlineg(BbbR^2)$, then $exists;(x_j)_j,(y_j)_jsubset BbbR^2$ such that beginaligng(x_j,y_j)to(t,z)endalign
Then $(g(x_j,y_j))_j$ is a Cauchy sequence in $BbbR^2$. So, $forall;epsilon>0,;exists;j_0inBbbN$ such that $forall;j,kgeq j_0$
beginalign|g(x_j,y_j)-g(x_k,y_k)|<epsilon.endalign
beginalign|(x_j+f(y_j),y_j+f(x_j))-(x_k+f(y_k),y_k+f(x_k))|<epsilon,;;forall;j,kgeq j_0;endalign
I think we should be able to use the fact that $f$ is $C^1$ implies that it is Lipschitz, to move forward but I don't know how-to. Please, can someone help me? I also would need a conclusion, drawn from all these! Thanks for your time and efforts!







share|cite|improve this question






















  • Open and close in $R^2$ means in this case just $R^2$ itself...
    – dmtri
    Aug 24 at 5:33






  • 1




    @dmtri: That's true since $BbbR^2$ is connected!
    – Mike
    Aug 24 at 6:06










  • If I am not mistaken this has to do with the completenence of $R$.
    – dmtri
    Aug 24 at 6:09






  • 1




    @dmtri: Something like that along the way!
    – Mike
    Aug 24 at 6:30














up vote
1
down vote

favorite
3












Let $f:BbbRtoBbbR$ be a $C^1$ function. Let $$g:BbbR^2toBbbR^2$$
$$(x,y)mapsto g(x,y)=(x+f(y),y+f(x)).$$
Suppose $suplimits_xinBbbR|f'(x)|<1.$



$i.)$ Prove that $forall;(x_0,y_0)in BbbR^2,;;g'(x_0,y_0)in ISO(BbbR^2)$



$ii.)$Prove that $g$ is one-one



$iii.)$Prove that $g(BbbR^2)$ is clopen in $BbbR^2.$



$iv.)$Conclude



Part $i.)$ and $ii.)$ are not problems at all. I have been able to show that $g(BbbR^2)$ is open by Local Inverse Mapping Theorem. So, I want to show that it is closed.



MY WORK:



It suffices to show that $overlineg(BbbR^2)subset g(BbbR^2).$



Let $(t,z)in overlineg(BbbR^2)$, then $exists;(x_j)_j,(y_j)_jsubset BbbR^2$ such that beginaligng(x_j,y_j)to(t,z)endalign
Then $(g(x_j,y_j))_j$ is a Cauchy sequence in $BbbR^2$. So, $forall;epsilon>0,;exists;j_0inBbbN$ such that $forall;j,kgeq j_0$
beginalign|g(x_j,y_j)-g(x_k,y_k)|<epsilon.endalign
beginalign|(x_j+f(y_j),y_j+f(x_j))-(x_k+f(y_k),y_k+f(x_k))|<epsilon,;;forall;j,kgeq j_0;endalign
I think we should be able to use the fact that $f$ is $C^1$ implies that it is Lipschitz, to move forward but I don't know how-to. Please, can someone help me? I also would need a conclusion, drawn from all these! Thanks for your time and efforts!







share|cite|improve this question






















  • Open and close in $R^2$ means in this case just $R^2$ itself...
    – dmtri
    Aug 24 at 5:33






  • 1




    @dmtri: That's true since $BbbR^2$ is connected!
    – Mike
    Aug 24 at 6:06










  • If I am not mistaken this has to do with the completenence of $R$.
    – dmtri
    Aug 24 at 6:09






  • 1




    @dmtri: Something like that along the way!
    – Mike
    Aug 24 at 6:30












up vote
1
down vote

favorite
3









up vote
1
down vote

favorite
3






3





Let $f:BbbRtoBbbR$ be a $C^1$ function. Let $$g:BbbR^2toBbbR^2$$
$$(x,y)mapsto g(x,y)=(x+f(y),y+f(x)).$$
Suppose $suplimits_xinBbbR|f'(x)|<1.$



$i.)$ Prove that $forall;(x_0,y_0)in BbbR^2,;;g'(x_0,y_0)in ISO(BbbR^2)$



$ii.)$Prove that $g$ is one-one



$iii.)$Prove that $g(BbbR^2)$ is clopen in $BbbR^2.$



$iv.)$Conclude



Part $i.)$ and $ii.)$ are not problems at all. I have been able to show that $g(BbbR^2)$ is open by Local Inverse Mapping Theorem. So, I want to show that it is closed.



MY WORK:



It suffices to show that $overlineg(BbbR^2)subset g(BbbR^2).$



Let $(t,z)in overlineg(BbbR^2)$, then $exists;(x_j)_j,(y_j)_jsubset BbbR^2$ such that beginaligng(x_j,y_j)to(t,z)endalign
Then $(g(x_j,y_j))_j$ is a Cauchy sequence in $BbbR^2$. So, $forall;epsilon>0,;exists;j_0inBbbN$ such that $forall;j,kgeq j_0$
beginalign|g(x_j,y_j)-g(x_k,y_k)|<epsilon.endalign
beginalign|(x_j+f(y_j),y_j+f(x_j))-(x_k+f(y_k),y_k+f(x_k))|<epsilon,;;forall;j,kgeq j_0;endalign
I think we should be able to use the fact that $f$ is $C^1$ implies that it is Lipschitz, to move forward but I don't know how-to. Please, can someone help me? I also would need a conclusion, drawn from all these! Thanks for your time and efforts!







share|cite|improve this question














Let $f:BbbRtoBbbR$ be a $C^1$ function. Let $$g:BbbR^2toBbbR^2$$
$$(x,y)mapsto g(x,y)=(x+f(y),y+f(x)).$$
Suppose $suplimits_xinBbbR|f'(x)|<1.$



$i.)$ Prove that $forall;(x_0,y_0)in BbbR^2,;;g'(x_0,y_0)in ISO(BbbR^2)$



$ii.)$Prove that $g$ is one-one



$iii.)$Prove that $g(BbbR^2)$ is clopen in $BbbR^2.$



$iv.)$Conclude



Part $i.)$ and $ii.)$ are not problems at all. I have been able to show that $g(BbbR^2)$ is open by Local Inverse Mapping Theorem. So, I want to show that it is closed.



MY WORK:



It suffices to show that $overlineg(BbbR^2)subset g(BbbR^2).$



Let $(t,z)in overlineg(BbbR^2)$, then $exists;(x_j)_j,(y_j)_jsubset BbbR^2$ such that beginaligng(x_j,y_j)to(t,z)endalign
Then $(g(x_j,y_j))_j$ is a Cauchy sequence in $BbbR^2$. So, $forall;epsilon>0,;exists;j_0inBbbN$ such that $forall;j,kgeq j_0$
beginalign|g(x_j,y_j)-g(x_k,y_k)|<epsilon.endalign
beginalign|(x_j+f(y_j),y_j+f(x_j))-(x_k+f(y_k),y_k+f(x_k))|<epsilon,;;forall;j,kgeq j_0;endalign
I think we should be able to use the fact that $f$ is $C^1$ implies that it is Lipschitz, to move forward but I don't know how-to. Please, can someone help me? I also would need a conclusion, drawn from all these! Thanks for your time and efforts!









share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 24 at 6:23

























asked Aug 24 at 5:27









Mike

75615




75615











  • Open and close in $R^2$ means in this case just $R^2$ itself...
    – dmtri
    Aug 24 at 5:33






  • 1




    @dmtri: That's true since $BbbR^2$ is connected!
    – Mike
    Aug 24 at 6:06










  • If I am not mistaken this has to do with the completenence of $R$.
    – dmtri
    Aug 24 at 6:09






  • 1




    @dmtri: Something like that along the way!
    – Mike
    Aug 24 at 6:30
















  • Open and close in $R^2$ means in this case just $R^2$ itself...
    – dmtri
    Aug 24 at 5:33






  • 1




    @dmtri: That's true since $BbbR^2$ is connected!
    – Mike
    Aug 24 at 6:06










  • If I am not mistaken this has to do with the completenence of $R$.
    – dmtri
    Aug 24 at 6:09






  • 1




    @dmtri: Something like that along the way!
    – Mike
    Aug 24 at 6:30















Open and close in $R^2$ means in this case just $R^2$ itself...
– dmtri
Aug 24 at 5:33




Open and close in $R^2$ means in this case just $R^2$ itself...
– dmtri
Aug 24 at 5:33




1




1




@dmtri: That's true since $BbbR^2$ is connected!
– Mike
Aug 24 at 6:06




@dmtri: That's true since $BbbR^2$ is connected!
– Mike
Aug 24 at 6:06












If I am not mistaken this has to do with the completenence of $R$.
– dmtri
Aug 24 at 6:09




If I am not mistaken this has to do with the completenence of $R$.
– dmtri
Aug 24 at 6:09




1




1




@dmtri: Something like that along the way!
– Mike
Aug 24 at 6:30




@dmtri: Something like that along the way!
– Mike
Aug 24 at 6:30










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










This is rather an extended comment.



Assume that $lVert cdot rVert$ is Euclidean norm on $mathbbR^2$. Put $mu := suplvert f'rvert < 1$. By the mean value theorem, for any $x, xi in mathbbR$ one has $lvert f(x) - f(xi) rvert le mu lvert x - xi rvert$.



For $(x,y), (xi, eta) in mathbbR^2$ we write
$$
lVert (x,y) - (xi,eta) rVert = lVert (x - xi, y - eta) rVert \
le lVert bigl((x + f(y)) - (xi + f(eta)), (y+ f(x)) - (eta + f(xi)bigr) rVert + lVert bigl(f(eta) - f(y), f(xi) - f(x)bigr) rVert.
$$
The first term on the right-hand side is just $lVert g(x,y) - g(xi,eta) rVert$. Regarding the second term, we estimate
$$
lVert bigl(f(eta) - f(y), f(xi) - f(x)bigr) rVert = sqrt(f(eta) - f(y))^2 + (f(xi) - f(x))^2 \
le sqrtmu^2 bigl((eta - y)^2 + (xi - x)^2bigr) = mu lVert (x,y) - (xi,eta) rVert.
$$
Consequently
$$
lVert (x,y) - (xi,eta) rVert le frac11 - mu lVert g(x,y) - g(xi,eta) rVert.
$$
Therefore, for a Cauchy sequence $(g(x_j,y_j))_j$, $((x_j,y_j))_j$ is a Cauchy sequence, too. By completeness, it converges to some $(tildex, tildey)$, and, by continuity, $g(tildex, tildey) = (t, z)$.



And a conclusion is that $g$ is a homeomorphism (even more, a $C^1$ diffeomorphism) of $mathbbR^2$ onto itself.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Exactly what I've been looking for! Thank you very much!
    – Mike
    Aug 24 at 12:18










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2892810%2flet-g-bbbr2-to-bbbr2-x-y-mapsto-gx-y-xfy-yfx-prove-that%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
2
down vote



accepted










This is rather an extended comment.



Assume that $lVert cdot rVert$ is Euclidean norm on $mathbbR^2$. Put $mu := suplvert f'rvert < 1$. By the mean value theorem, for any $x, xi in mathbbR$ one has $lvert f(x) - f(xi) rvert le mu lvert x - xi rvert$.



For $(x,y), (xi, eta) in mathbbR^2$ we write
$$
lVert (x,y) - (xi,eta) rVert = lVert (x - xi, y - eta) rVert \
le lVert bigl((x + f(y)) - (xi + f(eta)), (y+ f(x)) - (eta + f(xi)bigr) rVert + lVert bigl(f(eta) - f(y), f(xi) - f(x)bigr) rVert.
$$
The first term on the right-hand side is just $lVert g(x,y) - g(xi,eta) rVert$. Regarding the second term, we estimate
$$
lVert bigl(f(eta) - f(y), f(xi) - f(x)bigr) rVert = sqrt(f(eta) - f(y))^2 + (f(xi) - f(x))^2 \
le sqrtmu^2 bigl((eta - y)^2 + (xi - x)^2bigr) = mu lVert (x,y) - (xi,eta) rVert.
$$
Consequently
$$
lVert (x,y) - (xi,eta) rVert le frac11 - mu lVert g(x,y) - g(xi,eta) rVert.
$$
Therefore, for a Cauchy sequence $(g(x_j,y_j))_j$, $((x_j,y_j))_j$ is a Cauchy sequence, too. By completeness, it converges to some $(tildex, tildey)$, and, by continuity, $g(tildex, tildey) = (t, z)$.



And a conclusion is that $g$ is a homeomorphism (even more, a $C^1$ diffeomorphism) of $mathbbR^2$ onto itself.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Exactly what I've been looking for! Thank you very much!
    – Mike
    Aug 24 at 12:18














up vote
2
down vote



accepted










This is rather an extended comment.



Assume that $lVert cdot rVert$ is Euclidean norm on $mathbbR^2$. Put $mu := suplvert f'rvert < 1$. By the mean value theorem, for any $x, xi in mathbbR$ one has $lvert f(x) - f(xi) rvert le mu lvert x - xi rvert$.



For $(x,y), (xi, eta) in mathbbR^2$ we write
$$
lVert (x,y) - (xi,eta) rVert = lVert (x - xi, y - eta) rVert \
le lVert bigl((x + f(y)) - (xi + f(eta)), (y+ f(x)) - (eta + f(xi)bigr) rVert + lVert bigl(f(eta) - f(y), f(xi) - f(x)bigr) rVert.
$$
The first term on the right-hand side is just $lVert g(x,y) - g(xi,eta) rVert$. Regarding the second term, we estimate
$$
lVert bigl(f(eta) - f(y), f(xi) - f(x)bigr) rVert = sqrt(f(eta) - f(y))^2 + (f(xi) - f(x))^2 \
le sqrtmu^2 bigl((eta - y)^2 + (xi - x)^2bigr) = mu lVert (x,y) - (xi,eta) rVert.
$$
Consequently
$$
lVert (x,y) - (xi,eta) rVert le frac11 - mu lVert g(x,y) - g(xi,eta) rVert.
$$
Therefore, for a Cauchy sequence $(g(x_j,y_j))_j$, $((x_j,y_j))_j$ is a Cauchy sequence, too. By completeness, it converges to some $(tildex, tildey)$, and, by continuity, $g(tildex, tildey) = (t, z)$.



And a conclusion is that $g$ is a homeomorphism (even more, a $C^1$ diffeomorphism) of $mathbbR^2$ onto itself.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Exactly what I've been looking for! Thank you very much!
    – Mike
    Aug 24 at 12:18












up vote
2
down vote



accepted







up vote
2
down vote



accepted






This is rather an extended comment.



Assume that $lVert cdot rVert$ is Euclidean norm on $mathbbR^2$. Put $mu := suplvert f'rvert < 1$. By the mean value theorem, for any $x, xi in mathbbR$ one has $lvert f(x) - f(xi) rvert le mu lvert x - xi rvert$.



For $(x,y), (xi, eta) in mathbbR^2$ we write
$$
lVert (x,y) - (xi,eta) rVert = lVert (x - xi, y - eta) rVert \
le lVert bigl((x + f(y)) - (xi + f(eta)), (y+ f(x)) - (eta + f(xi)bigr) rVert + lVert bigl(f(eta) - f(y), f(xi) - f(x)bigr) rVert.
$$
The first term on the right-hand side is just $lVert g(x,y) - g(xi,eta) rVert$. Regarding the second term, we estimate
$$
lVert bigl(f(eta) - f(y), f(xi) - f(x)bigr) rVert = sqrt(f(eta) - f(y))^2 + (f(xi) - f(x))^2 \
le sqrtmu^2 bigl((eta - y)^2 + (xi - x)^2bigr) = mu lVert (x,y) - (xi,eta) rVert.
$$
Consequently
$$
lVert (x,y) - (xi,eta) rVert le frac11 - mu lVert g(x,y) - g(xi,eta) rVert.
$$
Therefore, for a Cauchy sequence $(g(x_j,y_j))_j$, $((x_j,y_j))_j$ is a Cauchy sequence, too. By completeness, it converges to some $(tildex, tildey)$, and, by continuity, $g(tildex, tildey) = (t, z)$.



And a conclusion is that $g$ is a homeomorphism (even more, a $C^1$ diffeomorphism) of $mathbbR^2$ onto itself.






share|cite|improve this answer












This is rather an extended comment.



Assume that $lVert cdot rVert$ is Euclidean norm on $mathbbR^2$. Put $mu := suplvert f'rvert < 1$. By the mean value theorem, for any $x, xi in mathbbR$ one has $lvert f(x) - f(xi) rvert le mu lvert x - xi rvert$.



For $(x,y), (xi, eta) in mathbbR^2$ we write
$$
lVert (x,y) - (xi,eta) rVert = lVert (x - xi, y - eta) rVert \
le lVert bigl((x + f(y)) - (xi + f(eta)), (y+ f(x)) - (eta + f(xi)bigr) rVert + lVert bigl(f(eta) - f(y), f(xi) - f(x)bigr) rVert.
$$
The first term on the right-hand side is just $lVert g(x,y) - g(xi,eta) rVert$. Regarding the second term, we estimate
$$
lVert bigl(f(eta) - f(y), f(xi) - f(x)bigr) rVert = sqrt(f(eta) - f(y))^2 + (f(xi) - f(x))^2 \
le sqrtmu^2 bigl((eta - y)^2 + (xi - x)^2bigr) = mu lVert (x,y) - (xi,eta) rVert.
$$
Consequently
$$
lVert (x,y) - (xi,eta) rVert le frac11 - mu lVert g(x,y) - g(xi,eta) rVert.
$$
Therefore, for a Cauchy sequence $(g(x_j,y_j))_j$, $((x_j,y_j))_j$ is a Cauchy sequence, too. By completeness, it converges to some $(tildex, tildey)$, and, by continuity, $g(tildex, tildey) = (t, z)$.



And a conclusion is that $g$ is a homeomorphism (even more, a $C^1$ diffeomorphism) of $mathbbR^2$ onto itself.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Aug 24 at 8:21









user539887

1,5491313




1,5491313











  • Exactly what I've been looking for! Thank you very much!
    – Mike
    Aug 24 at 12:18
















  • Exactly what I've been looking for! Thank you very much!
    – Mike
    Aug 24 at 12:18















Exactly what I've been looking for! Thank you very much!
– Mike
Aug 24 at 12:18




Exactly what I've been looking for! Thank you very much!
– Mike
Aug 24 at 12:18

















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2892810%2flet-g-bbbr2-to-bbbr2-x-y-mapsto-gx-y-xfy-yfx-prove-that%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

Mutual Information Always Non-negative

Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?