Are we allowed to interchange product and inverse limits?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












Currently, I am trying to show that the profinite completion $hatmathbbZ$ of $mathbbZ$ is isomorphic to $prod_p mathbbZ_p$ (as topological groups) where $p$ runs through all prime numbers and $mathbbZ_p$ denotes the ring of $p$-adic integers.



By definition, we know that $hatmathbbZ$ is the inverse limit of $mathbbZ/nmathbbZ$ and $mathbbZ_p$ is the inverse limit of $mathbbZ/p^nmathbbZ$. Furthermore, the Chinese Remainder Theorem tells us that if $n = prod_p p^e_p(n)$ denotes the prime factorization of $n$, then we have $$ mathbbZ/nmathbbZ simeq prod_p mathbbZ/p^e_p(n) mathbbZ.$$



So I would like to show that
$$
hatmathbbZ = varprojlim_n mathbbZ/nmathbbZ simeq varprojlim_n prod_p mathbbZ/p^e_p(n) mathbbZ = prod_p varprojlim_n mathbbZ/p^e_p(n) mathbbZ = prod_p varprojlim_n mathbbZ/p^n mathbbZ = prod_p mathbbZ_p,
$$



but I am not sure about these steps, especially with the third and fourth step. Could you please give me an easy explanation whether this works or not? Thank you!







share|cite|improve this question
















  • 2




    Yes, you can. A product is a particular case of an inverse limit and you can interchange inverse limits.
    – d.t.
    Aug 24 at 9:46










  • More generally you can interchange any two limits (in the categorical sense; in particular "direct limits" are not limits)
    – Max
    Aug 24 at 9:51






  • 1




    Okay, that is good to know! Could you maybe explain the second last step as well? I do not really see why this is true.
    – Diglett
    Aug 24 at 9:55














up vote
3
down vote

favorite












Currently, I am trying to show that the profinite completion $hatmathbbZ$ of $mathbbZ$ is isomorphic to $prod_p mathbbZ_p$ (as topological groups) where $p$ runs through all prime numbers and $mathbbZ_p$ denotes the ring of $p$-adic integers.



By definition, we know that $hatmathbbZ$ is the inverse limit of $mathbbZ/nmathbbZ$ and $mathbbZ_p$ is the inverse limit of $mathbbZ/p^nmathbbZ$. Furthermore, the Chinese Remainder Theorem tells us that if $n = prod_p p^e_p(n)$ denotes the prime factorization of $n$, then we have $$ mathbbZ/nmathbbZ simeq prod_p mathbbZ/p^e_p(n) mathbbZ.$$



So I would like to show that
$$
hatmathbbZ = varprojlim_n mathbbZ/nmathbbZ simeq varprojlim_n prod_p mathbbZ/p^e_p(n) mathbbZ = prod_p varprojlim_n mathbbZ/p^e_p(n) mathbbZ = prod_p varprojlim_n mathbbZ/p^n mathbbZ = prod_p mathbbZ_p,
$$



but I am not sure about these steps, especially with the third and fourth step. Could you please give me an easy explanation whether this works or not? Thank you!







share|cite|improve this question
















  • 2




    Yes, you can. A product is a particular case of an inverse limit and you can interchange inverse limits.
    – d.t.
    Aug 24 at 9:46










  • More generally you can interchange any two limits (in the categorical sense; in particular "direct limits" are not limits)
    – Max
    Aug 24 at 9:51






  • 1




    Okay, that is good to know! Could you maybe explain the second last step as well? I do not really see why this is true.
    – Diglett
    Aug 24 at 9:55












up vote
3
down vote

favorite









up vote
3
down vote

favorite











Currently, I am trying to show that the profinite completion $hatmathbbZ$ of $mathbbZ$ is isomorphic to $prod_p mathbbZ_p$ (as topological groups) where $p$ runs through all prime numbers and $mathbbZ_p$ denotes the ring of $p$-adic integers.



By definition, we know that $hatmathbbZ$ is the inverse limit of $mathbbZ/nmathbbZ$ and $mathbbZ_p$ is the inverse limit of $mathbbZ/p^nmathbbZ$. Furthermore, the Chinese Remainder Theorem tells us that if $n = prod_p p^e_p(n)$ denotes the prime factorization of $n$, then we have $$ mathbbZ/nmathbbZ simeq prod_p mathbbZ/p^e_p(n) mathbbZ.$$



So I would like to show that
$$
hatmathbbZ = varprojlim_n mathbbZ/nmathbbZ simeq varprojlim_n prod_p mathbbZ/p^e_p(n) mathbbZ = prod_p varprojlim_n mathbbZ/p^e_p(n) mathbbZ = prod_p varprojlim_n mathbbZ/p^n mathbbZ = prod_p mathbbZ_p,
$$



but I am not sure about these steps, especially with the third and fourth step. Could you please give me an easy explanation whether this works or not? Thank you!







share|cite|improve this question












Currently, I am trying to show that the profinite completion $hatmathbbZ$ of $mathbbZ$ is isomorphic to $prod_p mathbbZ_p$ (as topological groups) where $p$ runs through all prime numbers and $mathbbZ_p$ denotes the ring of $p$-adic integers.



By definition, we know that $hatmathbbZ$ is the inverse limit of $mathbbZ/nmathbbZ$ and $mathbbZ_p$ is the inverse limit of $mathbbZ/p^nmathbbZ$. Furthermore, the Chinese Remainder Theorem tells us that if $n = prod_p p^e_p(n)$ denotes the prime factorization of $n$, then we have $$ mathbbZ/nmathbbZ simeq prod_p mathbbZ/p^e_p(n) mathbbZ.$$



So I would like to show that
$$
hatmathbbZ = varprojlim_n mathbbZ/nmathbbZ simeq varprojlim_n prod_p mathbbZ/p^e_p(n) mathbbZ = prod_p varprojlim_n mathbbZ/p^e_p(n) mathbbZ = prod_p varprojlim_n mathbbZ/p^n mathbbZ = prod_p mathbbZ_p,
$$



but I am not sure about these steps, especially with the third and fourth step. Could you please give me an easy explanation whether this works or not? Thank you!









share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Aug 24 at 9:36









Diglett

579311




579311







  • 2




    Yes, you can. A product is a particular case of an inverse limit and you can interchange inverse limits.
    – d.t.
    Aug 24 at 9:46










  • More generally you can interchange any two limits (in the categorical sense; in particular "direct limits" are not limits)
    – Max
    Aug 24 at 9:51






  • 1




    Okay, that is good to know! Could you maybe explain the second last step as well? I do not really see why this is true.
    – Diglett
    Aug 24 at 9:55












  • 2




    Yes, you can. A product is a particular case of an inverse limit and you can interchange inverse limits.
    – d.t.
    Aug 24 at 9:46










  • More generally you can interchange any two limits (in the categorical sense; in particular "direct limits" are not limits)
    – Max
    Aug 24 at 9:51






  • 1




    Okay, that is good to know! Could you maybe explain the second last step as well? I do not really see why this is true.
    – Diglett
    Aug 24 at 9:55







2




2




Yes, you can. A product is a particular case of an inverse limit and you can interchange inverse limits.
– d.t.
Aug 24 at 9:46




Yes, you can. A product is a particular case of an inverse limit and you can interchange inverse limits.
– d.t.
Aug 24 at 9:46












More generally you can interchange any two limits (in the categorical sense; in particular "direct limits" are not limits)
– Max
Aug 24 at 9:51




More generally you can interchange any two limits (in the categorical sense; in particular "direct limits" are not limits)
– Max
Aug 24 at 9:51




1




1




Okay, that is good to know! Could you maybe explain the second last step as well? I do not really see why this is true.
– Diglett
Aug 24 at 9:55




Okay, that is good to know! Could you maybe explain the second last step as well? I do not really see why this is true.
– Diglett
Aug 24 at 9:55















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2892937%2fare-we-allowed-to-interchange-product-and-inverse-limits%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2892937%2fare-we-allowed-to-interchange-product-and-inverse-limits%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

Mutual Information Always Non-negative

Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?