Prove that : There exists a vector $x$ such that $Mx = x$ , where $M$ is a Markov matrix [closed]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Here's a proof that I found which looks pretty simple but I can't understand the last step.
(A Markov matrix is a square matrix whose columns sum to one;
$I$ is an identity matrix;
$M^T$ and $I^T$ refer to the transpose matrices)



enter image description here







share|cite|improve this question














closed as off-topic by José Carlos Santos, Brahadeesh, Adrian Keister, Key Flex, Leucippus Aug 16 at 0:12


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – José Carlos Santos, Brahadeesh, Adrian Keister, Key Flex, Leucippus
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • A quick search returns a few similar posts: Is it true that for any square row-stochastic matrix one of the eigenvalues is $1$?, Eigenvector corresponding to eigenvalue $1$ of a stochastic matrix, Proof that the largest eigenvalue of a stochastic matrix is $1$, and probably many others.
    – Martin Sleziak
    Aug 15 at 12:34















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Here's a proof that I found which looks pretty simple but I can't understand the last step.
(A Markov matrix is a square matrix whose columns sum to one;
$I$ is an identity matrix;
$M^T$ and $I^T$ refer to the transpose matrices)



enter image description here







share|cite|improve this question














closed as off-topic by José Carlos Santos, Brahadeesh, Adrian Keister, Key Flex, Leucippus Aug 16 at 0:12


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – José Carlos Santos, Brahadeesh, Adrian Keister, Key Flex, Leucippus
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • A quick search returns a few similar posts: Is it true that for any square row-stochastic matrix one of the eigenvalues is $1$?, Eigenvector corresponding to eigenvalue $1$ of a stochastic matrix, Proof that the largest eigenvalue of a stochastic matrix is $1$, and probably many others.
    – Martin Sleziak
    Aug 15 at 12:34













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Here's a proof that I found which looks pretty simple but I can't understand the last step.
(A Markov matrix is a square matrix whose columns sum to one;
$I$ is an identity matrix;
$M^T$ and $I^T$ refer to the transpose matrices)



enter image description here







share|cite|improve this question














Here's a proof that I found which looks pretty simple but I can't understand the last step.
(A Markov matrix is a square matrix whose columns sum to one;
$I$ is an identity matrix;
$M^T$ and $I^T$ refer to the transpose matrices)



enter image description here









share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 15 at 8:24









Rodrigo de Azevedo

12.6k41751




12.6k41751










asked Aug 15 at 6:38









Vanessa

33




33




closed as off-topic by José Carlos Santos, Brahadeesh, Adrian Keister, Key Flex, Leucippus Aug 16 at 0:12


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – José Carlos Santos, Brahadeesh, Adrian Keister, Key Flex, Leucippus
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




closed as off-topic by José Carlos Santos, Brahadeesh, Adrian Keister, Key Flex, Leucippus Aug 16 at 0:12


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – José Carlos Santos, Brahadeesh, Adrian Keister, Key Flex, Leucippus
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • A quick search returns a few similar posts: Is it true that for any square row-stochastic matrix one of the eigenvalues is $1$?, Eigenvector corresponding to eigenvalue $1$ of a stochastic matrix, Proof that the largest eigenvalue of a stochastic matrix is $1$, and probably many others.
    – Martin Sleziak
    Aug 15 at 12:34

















  • A quick search returns a few similar posts: Is it true that for any square row-stochastic matrix one of the eigenvalues is $1$?, Eigenvector corresponding to eigenvalue $1$ of a stochastic matrix, Proof that the largest eigenvalue of a stochastic matrix is $1$, and probably many others.
    – Martin Sleziak
    Aug 15 at 12:34
















A quick search returns a few similar posts: Is it true that for any square row-stochastic matrix one of the eigenvalues is $1$?, Eigenvector corresponding to eigenvalue $1$ of a stochastic matrix, Proof that the largest eigenvalue of a stochastic matrix is $1$, and probably many others.
– Martin Sleziak
Aug 15 at 12:34





A quick search returns a few similar posts: Is it true that for any square row-stochastic matrix one of the eigenvalues is $1$?, Eigenvector corresponding to eigenvalue $1$ of a stochastic matrix, Proof that the largest eigenvalue of a stochastic matrix is $1$, and probably many others.
– Martin Sleziak
Aug 15 at 12:34











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










The determinants of a square matrix and its transpose are identical. This means that their characteristic polynomials are identical, which in turn means that they have the same eigenvalues. When you left-multiply a matrix by a vector, the result is a linear combination of the matrix rows. In particular, left-multiplying by a vector of all $1$s sums the rows of the matrix. Each column of a Markov matrix sums to $1$, therefore $mathbf 1^TM = mathbf 1^T$. Transposing, we see that $mathbf 1$ is an eigenvector of $M^T$ with eigenvalue $1$, therefore $1$ is an eigenvalue of $M$ and there must by definition exist some non-zero vector $mathbf x$ such that $Mmathbf x=mathbf x$.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Thank you so muchhhh
    – Vanessa
    Aug 16 at 3:38

















up vote
1
down vote













I am not sure about the notations, as you only made a part of the proof available, where the notations are not defined. In fact, I probably use the reverse setup. So long story short, this might not ne a good answer, and there is no way to tell until you make the problem clear.



But if by Markov matrix you mean a non-negative square matrix whose columns (?) add up to 1, then the reason $M^T-I$ has an eigenvector is that the all $1$ vector is trivially a good example.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Im so sorry but I didn't really understand that, how do we know that the all 1 vector is an eigenvector?
    – Vanessa
    Aug 15 at 7:55










  • Could you provide more details before asking more questions, please? Is my guess about the notations correct?
    – A. Pongrácz
    Aug 15 at 7:59










  • I edited the question to add notations before I posted that comment
    – Vanessa
    Aug 16 at 3:32

















2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
2
down vote



accepted










The determinants of a square matrix and its transpose are identical. This means that their characteristic polynomials are identical, which in turn means that they have the same eigenvalues. When you left-multiply a matrix by a vector, the result is a linear combination of the matrix rows. In particular, left-multiplying by a vector of all $1$s sums the rows of the matrix. Each column of a Markov matrix sums to $1$, therefore $mathbf 1^TM = mathbf 1^T$. Transposing, we see that $mathbf 1$ is an eigenvector of $M^T$ with eigenvalue $1$, therefore $1$ is an eigenvalue of $M$ and there must by definition exist some non-zero vector $mathbf x$ such that $Mmathbf x=mathbf x$.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Thank you so muchhhh
    – Vanessa
    Aug 16 at 3:38














up vote
2
down vote



accepted










The determinants of a square matrix and its transpose are identical. This means that their characteristic polynomials are identical, which in turn means that they have the same eigenvalues. When you left-multiply a matrix by a vector, the result is a linear combination of the matrix rows. In particular, left-multiplying by a vector of all $1$s sums the rows of the matrix. Each column of a Markov matrix sums to $1$, therefore $mathbf 1^TM = mathbf 1^T$. Transposing, we see that $mathbf 1$ is an eigenvector of $M^T$ with eigenvalue $1$, therefore $1$ is an eigenvalue of $M$ and there must by definition exist some non-zero vector $mathbf x$ such that $Mmathbf x=mathbf x$.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Thank you so muchhhh
    – Vanessa
    Aug 16 at 3:38












up vote
2
down vote



accepted







up vote
2
down vote



accepted






The determinants of a square matrix and its transpose are identical. This means that their characteristic polynomials are identical, which in turn means that they have the same eigenvalues. When you left-multiply a matrix by a vector, the result is a linear combination of the matrix rows. In particular, left-multiplying by a vector of all $1$s sums the rows of the matrix. Each column of a Markov matrix sums to $1$, therefore $mathbf 1^TM = mathbf 1^T$. Transposing, we see that $mathbf 1$ is an eigenvector of $M^T$ with eigenvalue $1$, therefore $1$ is an eigenvalue of $M$ and there must by definition exist some non-zero vector $mathbf x$ such that $Mmathbf x=mathbf x$.






share|cite|improve this answer












The determinants of a square matrix and its transpose are identical. This means that their characteristic polynomials are identical, which in turn means that they have the same eigenvalues. When you left-multiply a matrix by a vector, the result is a linear combination of the matrix rows. In particular, left-multiplying by a vector of all $1$s sums the rows of the matrix. Each column of a Markov matrix sums to $1$, therefore $mathbf 1^TM = mathbf 1^T$. Transposing, we see that $mathbf 1$ is an eigenvector of $M^T$ with eigenvalue $1$, therefore $1$ is an eigenvalue of $M$ and there must by definition exist some non-zero vector $mathbf x$ such that $Mmathbf x=mathbf x$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Aug 15 at 8:11









amd

26.2k2944




26.2k2944











  • Thank you so muchhhh
    – Vanessa
    Aug 16 at 3:38
















  • Thank you so muchhhh
    – Vanessa
    Aug 16 at 3:38















Thank you so muchhhh
– Vanessa
Aug 16 at 3:38




Thank you so muchhhh
– Vanessa
Aug 16 at 3:38










up vote
1
down vote













I am not sure about the notations, as you only made a part of the proof available, where the notations are not defined. In fact, I probably use the reverse setup. So long story short, this might not ne a good answer, and there is no way to tell until you make the problem clear.



But if by Markov matrix you mean a non-negative square matrix whose columns (?) add up to 1, then the reason $M^T-I$ has an eigenvector is that the all $1$ vector is trivially a good example.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Im so sorry but I didn't really understand that, how do we know that the all 1 vector is an eigenvector?
    – Vanessa
    Aug 15 at 7:55










  • Could you provide more details before asking more questions, please? Is my guess about the notations correct?
    – A. Pongrácz
    Aug 15 at 7:59










  • I edited the question to add notations before I posted that comment
    – Vanessa
    Aug 16 at 3:32














up vote
1
down vote













I am not sure about the notations, as you only made a part of the proof available, where the notations are not defined. In fact, I probably use the reverse setup. So long story short, this might not ne a good answer, and there is no way to tell until you make the problem clear.



But if by Markov matrix you mean a non-negative square matrix whose columns (?) add up to 1, then the reason $M^T-I$ has an eigenvector is that the all $1$ vector is trivially a good example.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Im so sorry but I didn't really understand that, how do we know that the all 1 vector is an eigenvector?
    – Vanessa
    Aug 15 at 7:55










  • Could you provide more details before asking more questions, please? Is my guess about the notations correct?
    – A. Pongrácz
    Aug 15 at 7:59










  • I edited the question to add notations before I posted that comment
    – Vanessa
    Aug 16 at 3:32












up vote
1
down vote










up vote
1
down vote









I am not sure about the notations, as you only made a part of the proof available, where the notations are not defined. In fact, I probably use the reverse setup. So long story short, this might not ne a good answer, and there is no way to tell until you make the problem clear.



But if by Markov matrix you mean a non-negative square matrix whose columns (?) add up to 1, then the reason $M^T-I$ has an eigenvector is that the all $1$ vector is trivially a good example.






share|cite|improve this answer












I am not sure about the notations, as you only made a part of the proof available, where the notations are not defined. In fact, I probably use the reverse setup. So long story short, this might not ne a good answer, and there is no way to tell until you make the problem clear.



But if by Markov matrix you mean a non-negative square matrix whose columns (?) add up to 1, then the reason $M^T-I$ has an eigenvector is that the all $1$ vector is trivially a good example.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Aug 15 at 6:42









A. Pongrácz

3,797625




3,797625











  • Im so sorry but I didn't really understand that, how do we know that the all 1 vector is an eigenvector?
    – Vanessa
    Aug 15 at 7:55










  • Could you provide more details before asking more questions, please? Is my guess about the notations correct?
    – A. Pongrácz
    Aug 15 at 7:59










  • I edited the question to add notations before I posted that comment
    – Vanessa
    Aug 16 at 3:32
















  • Im so sorry but I didn't really understand that, how do we know that the all 1 vector is an eigenvector?
    – Vanessa
    Aug 15 at 7:55










  • Could you provide more details before asking more questions, please? Is my guess about the notations correct?
    – A. Pongrácz
    Aug 15 at 7:59










  • I edited the question to add notations before I posted that comment
    – Vanessa
    Aug 16 at 3:32















Im so sorry but I didn't really understand that, how do we know that the all 1 vector is an eigenvector?
– Vanessa
Aug 15 at 7:55




Im so sorry but I didn't really understand that, how do we know that the all 1 vector is an eigenvector?
– Vanessa
Aug 15 at 7:55












Could you provide more details before asking more questions, please? Is my guess about the notations correct?
– A. Pongrácz
Aug 15 at 7:59




Could you provide more details before asking more questions, please? Is my guess about the notations correct?
– A. Pongrácz
Aug 15 at 7:59












I edited the question to add notations before I posted that comment
– Vanessa
Aug 16 at 3:32




I edited the question to add notations before I posted that comment
– Vanessa
Aug 16 at 3:32


這個網誌中的熱門文章

tkz-euclide: tkzDrawCircle[R] not working

How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

1st Magritte Awards