How to derive the solution of the wave equation in a finite interval with inhomogenous boundary conditions $u(0,t)=h(t),v(l,t)=k(t)$

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












We have the following problem:
$$u_tt=c^2u_xx$$
$$u(x,0)=u_t(x,0)=0$$
$$u(0,t)=h(t),u(l,t)=k(t).$$
From the first two conditions one can deduce that $u(x,t)=0$ for $x>ct$ since the solution to the wave equation is of the form $f(x+ct)+g(x-ct)$ and for $x>ct$ we have that $f+g=0$ and $f'=g'.$ Combining these conditions implies that $f(y)=C$ and $g(y)=-C$ for some constant $C.$



The boundary condition data implies that $f(ct)+g(-ct)=h(t)$ and $f(l+ct)+g(l-ct)=k(t).$ Since $ct>0$ we have that $f(ct)=C$ and therefore for $y<0$
$$g(-ct)=-C+h(t)implies g(y)=-C+h(-y/c).$$ Since the solution is a sum of $f(x+ct)$ and $g(x-ct)$ the final result will therefore be for $x<ct$
$$h(t-x/c).$$
The answer is however in the form of a series
$$u(x,t)= h(t-x/c)-h(t+(x/2l)/c)+h(t-(x+2l)/c)-...+k(t+(x-l)/c)-k(t-(x-l)/c)+..$$
How do I go about deriving this expression?







share|cite|improve this question




















  • You may have a look at this post where the sub-case $h=0$, $k=sin$ is tackled in two answers.
    – Harry49
    Aug 16 at 11:07















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












We have the following problem:
$$u_tt=c^2u_xx$$
$$u(x,0)=u_t(x,0)=0$$
$$u(0,t)=h(t),u(l,t)=k(t).$$
From the first two conditions one can deduce that $u(x,t)=0$ for $x>ct$ since the solution to the wave equation is of the form $f(x+ct)+g(x-ct)$ and for $x>ct$ we have that $f+g=0$ and $f'=g'.$ Combining these conditions implies that $f(y)=C$ and $g(y)=-C$ for some constant $C.$



The boundary condition data implies that $f(ct)+g(-ct)=h(t)$ and $f(l+ct)+g(l-ct)=k(t).$ Since $ct>0$ we have that $f(ct)=C$ and therefore for $y<0$
$$g(-ct)=-C+h(t)implies g(y)=-C+h(-y/c).$$ Since the solution is a sum of $f(x+ct)$ and $g(x-ct)$ the final result will therefore be for $x<ct$
$$h(t-x/c).$$
The answer is however in the form of a series
$$u(x,t)= h(t-x/c)-h(t+(x/2l)/c)+h(t-(x+2l)/c)-...+k(t+(x-l)/c)-k(t-(x-l)/c)+..$$
How do I go about deriving this expression?







share|cite|improve this question




















  • You may have a look at this post where the sub-case $h=0$, $k=sin$ is tackled in two answers.
    – Harry49
    Aug 16 at 11:07













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











We have the following problem:
$$u_tt=c^2u_xx$$
$$u(x,0)=u_t(x,0)=0$$
$$u(0,t)=h(t),u(l,t)=k(t).$$
From the first two conditions one can deduce that $u(x,t)=0$ for $x>ct$ since the solution to the wave equation is of the form $f(x+ct)+g(x-ct)$ and for $x>ct$ we have that $f+g=0$ and $f'=g'.$ Combining these conditions implies that $f(y)=C$ and $g(y)=-C$ for some constant $C.$



The boundary condition data implies that $f(ct)+g(-ct)=h(t)$ and $f(l+ct)+g(l-ct)=k(t).$ Since $ct>0$ we have that $f(ct)=C$ and therefore for $y<0$
$$g(-ct)=-C+h(t)implies g(y)=-C+h(-y/c).$$ Since the solution is a sum of $f(x+ct)$ and $g(x-ct)$ the final result will therefore be for $x<ct$
$$h(t-x/c).$$
The answer is however in the form of a series
$$u(x,t)= h(t-x/c)-h(t+(x/2l)/c)+h(t-(x+2l)/c)-...+k(t+(x-l)/c)-k(t-(x-l)/c)+..$$
How do I go about deriving this expression?







share|cite|improve this question












We have the following problem:
$$u_tt=c^2u_xx$$
$$u(x,0)=u_t(x,0)=0$$
$$u(0,t)=h(t),u(l,t)=k(t).$$
From the first two conditions one can deduce that $u(x,t)=0$ for $x>ct$ since the solution to the wave equation is of the form $f(x+ct)+g(x-ct)$ and for $x>ct$ we have that $f+g=0$ and $f'=g'.$ Combining these conditions implies that $f(y)=C$ and $g(y)=-C$ for some constant $C.$



The boundary condition data implies that $f(ct)+g(-ct)=h(t)$ and $f(l+ct)+g(l-ct)=k(t).$ Since $ct>0$ we have that $f(ct)=C$ and therefore for $y<0$
$$g(-ct)=-C+h(t)implies g(y)=-C+h(-y/c).$$ Since the solution is a sum of $f(x+ct)$ and $g(x-ct)$ the final result will therefore be for $x<ct$
$$h(t-x/c).$$
The answer is however in the form of a series
$$u(x,t)= h(t-x/c)-h(t+(x/2l)/c)+h(t-(x+2l)/c)-...+k(t+(x-l)/c)-k(t-(x-l)/c)+..$$
How do I go about deriving this expression?









share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Aug 15 at 5:30









Hello_World

2,95821328




2,95821328











  • You may have a look at this post where the sub-case $h=0$, $k=sin$ is tackled in two answers.
    – Harry49
    Aug 16 at 11:07

















  • You may have a look at this post where the sub-case $h=0$, $k=sin$ is tackled in two answers.
    – Harry49
    Aug 16 at 11:07
















You may have a look at this post where the sub-case $h=0$, $k=sin$ is tackled in two answers.
– Harry49
Aug 16 at 11:07





You may have a look at this post where the sub-case $h=0$, $k=sin$ is tackled in two answers.
– Harry49
Aug 16 at 11:07
















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2883231%2fhow-to-derive-the-solution-of-the-wave-equation-in-a-finite-interval-with-inhomo%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes










 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2883231%2fhow-to-derive-the-solution-of-the-wave-equation-in-a-finite-interval-with-inhomo%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

tkz-euclide: tkzDrawCircle[R] not working

How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

1st Magritte Awards