How to derive the solution of the wave equation in a finite interval with inhomogenous boundary conditions $u(0,t)=h(t),v(l,t)=k(t)$

Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
We have the following problem:
$$u_tt=c^2u_xx$$
$$u(x,0)=u_t(x,0)=0$$
$$u(0,t)=h(t),u(l,t)=k(t).$$
From the first two conditions one can deduce that $u(x,t)=0$ for $x>ct$ since the solution to the wave equation is of the form $f(x+ct)+g(x-ct)$ and for $x>ct$ we have that $f+g=0$ and $f'=g'.$ Combining these conditions implies that $f(y)=C$ and $g(y)=-C$ for some constant $C.$
The boundary condition data implies that $f(ct)+g(-ct)=h(t)$ and $f(l+ct)+g(l-ct)=k(t).$ Since $ct>0$ we have that $f(ct)=C$ and therefore for $y<0$
$$g(-ct)=-C+h(t)implies g(y)=-C+h(-y/c).$$ Since the solution is a sum of $f(x+ct)$ and $g(x-ct)$ the final result will therefore be for $x<ct$
$$h(t-x/c).$$
The answer is however in the form of a series
$$u(x,t)= h(t-x/c)-h(t+(x/2l)/c)+h(t-(x+2l)/c)-...+k(t+(x-l)/c)-k(t-(x-l)/c)+..$$
How do I go about deriving this expression?
pde
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
We have the following problem:
$$u_tt=c^2u_xx$$
$$u(x,0)=u_t(x,0)=0$$
$$u(0,t)=h(t),u(l,t)=k(t).$$
From the first two conditions one can deduce that $u(x,t)=0$ for $x>ct$ since the solution to the wave equation is of the form $f(x+ct)+g(x-ct)$ and for $x>ct$ we have that $f+g=0$ and $f'=g'.$ Combining these conditions implies that $f(y)=C$ and $g(y)=-C$ for some constant $C.$
The boundary condition data implies that $f(ct)+g(-ct)=h(t)$ and $f(l+ct)+g(l-ct)=k(t).$ Since $ct>0$ we have that $f(ct)=C$ and therefore for $y<0$
$$g(-ct)=-C+h(t)implies g(y)=-C+h(-y/c).$$ Since the solution is a sum of $f(x+ct)$ and $g(x-ct)$ the final result will therefore be for $x<ct$
$$h(t-x/c).$$
The answer is however in the form of a series
$$u(x,t)= h(t-x/c)-h(t+(x/2l)/c)+h(t-(x+2l)/c)-...+k(t+(x-l)/c)-k(t-(x-l)/c)+..$$
How do I go about deriving this expression?
pde
You may have a look at this post where the sub-case $h=0$, $k=sin$ is tackled in two answers.
â Harry49
Aug 16 at 11:07
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
We have the following problem:
$$u_tt=c^2u_xx$$
$$u(x,0)=u_t(x,0)=0$$
$$u(0,t)=h(t),u(l,t)=k(t).$$
From the first two conditions one can deduce that $u(x,t)=0$ for $x>ct$ since the solution to the wave equation is of the form $f(x+ct)+g(x-ct)$ and for $x>ct$ we have that $f+g=0$ and $f'=g'.$ Combining these conditions implies that $f(y)=C$ and $g(y)=-C$ for some constant $C.$
The boundary condition data implies that $f(ct)+g(-ct)=h(t)$ and $f(l+ct)+g(l-ct)=k(t).$ Since $ct>0$ we have that $f(ct)=C$ and therefore for $y<0$
$$g(-ct)=-C+h(t)implies g(y)=-C+h(-y/c).$$ Since the solution is a sum of $f(x+ct)$ and $g(x-ct)$ the final result will therefore be for $x<ct$
$$h(t-x/c).$$
The answer is however in the form of a series
$$u(x,t)= h(t-x/c)-h(t+(x/2l)/c)+h(t-(x+2l)/c)-...+k(t+(x-l)/c)-k(t-(x-l)/c)+..$$
How do I go about deriving this expression?
pde
We have the following problem:
$$u_tt=c^2u_xx$$
$$u(x,0)=u_t(x,0)=0$$
$$u(0,t)=h(t),u(l,t)=k(t).$$
From the first two conditions one can deduce that $u(x,t)=0$ for $x>ct$ since the solution to the wave equation is of the form $f(x+ct)+g(x-ct)$ and for $x>ct$ we have that $f+g=0$ and $f'=g'.$ Combining these conditions implies that $f(y)=C$ and $g(y)=-C$ for some constant $C.$
The boundary condition data implies that $f(ct)+g(-ct)=h(t)$ and $f(l+ct)+g(l-ct)=k(t).$ Since $ct>0$ we have that $f(ct)=C$ and therefore for $y<0$
$$g(-ct)=-C+h(t)implies g(y)=-C+h(-y/c).$$ Since the solution is a sum of $f(x+ct)$ and $g(x-ct)$ the final result will therefore be for $x<ct$
$$h(t-x/c).$$
The answer is however in the form of a series
$$u(x,t)= h(t-x/c)-h(t+(x/2l)/c)+h(t-(x+2l)/c)-...+k(t+(x-l)/c)-k(t-(x-l)/c)+..$$
How do I go about deriving this expression?
pde
asked Aug 15 at 5:30
Hello_World
2,95821328
2,95821328
You may have a look at this post where the sub-case $h=0$, $k=sin$ is tackled in two answers.
â Harry49
Aug 16 at 11:07
add a comment |Â
You may have a look at this post where the sub-case $h=0$, $k=sin$ is tackled in two answers.
â Harry49
Aug 16 at 11:07
You may have a look at this post where the sub-case $h=0$, $k=sin$ is tackled in two answers.
â Harry49
Aug 16 at 11:07
You may have a look at this post where the sub-case $h=0$, $k=sin$ is tackled in two answers.
â Harry49
Aug 16 at 11:07
add a comment |Â
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2883231%2fhow-to-derive-the-solution-of-the-wave-equation-in-a-finite-interval-with-inhomo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
You may have a look at this post where the sub-case $h=0$, $k=sin$ is tackled in two answers.
â Harry49
Aug 16 at 11:07