What is the considered topology in the problem and Proof verification : $pi$ is closed but not open (map)

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I was trying to solve the following question :



Let $Xsubset Bbb R times Bbb R$ be the union of $Bbb R times 0$ and $0 times Bbb R$. Let $pi : X to Bbb R$ be the projection map of the first coordinate restricted to $X$ . Prove that $pi$ is a closed map but not an open map.



I believe I can do the problem but I am facing difficulty in understanding what the underlying topology is i.e. whether it is the subspace topology or the product topology or something like the disjoint union topology.



So if someone suggest me what precisely are the open sets in X, then I could try the problem myself.



EDIT :



After considering the topology suggested in the comments, I have tried the problem.



$A := (x,y)in X: x=0, 1<y<2$ is an open set in $X$ since it can be obtained as (in particular) $(x,y)in X: -1 <x<1, 1<y<2 cap X$ with the former being open in $Bbb R^2$ . But, $pi(A) = 0$ and thus $pi(A)$ is closed in $Bbb R$ !



To show that $pi$ is a closed map, A closed set in $X$ is of the form $C^/ =C cap X$ where $C$ is a closed set in $Bbb R^2$ .Since a closed set in $Bbb R^2$ is of the form $C_1 times C_2$ where $C_1,C_2$ are closed in $Bbb R$.



Thus $pi(C^/)=pi(Ccap X)=pi((C_1 times C_2)cap X)= C_1$ which is closed in $Bbb R$ , so it's a closed map.



Can someone please check the proof and please point out mistakes.







share|cite|improve this question


















  • 3




    Unless otherwise stated, you assume $BbbRtimes BbbR=BbbR^2$ has the usual metric topology and $X$ has the subspace topology.
    – Oliver Jones
    Aug 15 at 7:02






  • 2




    By the way, the product topology on $BbbR^n$ coincides with the metric topology.
    – Oliver Jones
    Aug 15 at 7:04










  • So you mean the subspace topology inherited from the usual topology on $Bbb R^2$ ?
    – ThatIs
    Aug 15 at 7:06










  • Yes, there are no other possibilities.
    – Oliver Jones
    Aug 15 at 7:08














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I was trying to solve the following question :



Let $Xsubset Bbb R times Bbb R$ be the union of $Bbb R times 0$ and $0 times Bbb R$. Let $pi : X to Bbb R$ be the projection map of the first coordinate restricted to $X$ . Prove that $pi$ is a closed map but not an open map.



I believe I can do the problem but I am facing difficulty in understanding what the underlying topology is i.e. whether it is the subspace topology or the product topology or something like the disjoint union topology.



So if someone suggest me what precisely are the open sets in X, then I could try the problem myself.



EDIT :



After considering the topology suggested in the comments, I have tried the problem.



$A := (x,y)in X: x=0, 1<y<2$ is an open set in $X$ since it can be obtained as (in particular) $(x,y)in X: -1 <x<1, 1<y<2 cap X$ with the former being open in $Bbb R^2$ . But, $pi(A) = 0$ and thus $pi(A)$ is closed in $Bbb R$ !



To show that $pi$ is a closed map, A closed set in $X$ is of the form $C^/ =C cap X$ where $C$ is a closed set in $Bbb R^2$ .Since a closed set in $Bbb R^2$ is of the form $C_1 times C_2$ where $C_1,C_2$ are closed in $Bbb R$.



Thus $pi(C^/)=pi(Ccap X)=pi((C_1 times C_2)cap X)= C_1$ which is closed in $Bbb R$ , so it's a closed map.



Can someone please check the proof and please point out mistakes.







share|cite|improve this question


















  • 3




    Unless otherwise stated, you assume $BbbRtimes BbbR=BbbR^2$ has the usual metric topology and $X$ has the subspace topology.
    – Oliver Jones
    Aug 15 at 7:02






  • 2




    By the way, the product topology on $BbbR^n$ coincides with the metric topology.
    – Oliver Jones
    Aug 15 at 7:04










  • So you mean the subspace topology inherited from the usual topology on $Bbb R^2$ ?
    – ThatIs
    Aug 15 at 7:06










  • Yes, there are no other possibilities.
    – Oliver Jones
    Aug 15 at 7:08












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I was trying to solve the following question :



Let $Xsubset Bbb R times Bbb R$ be the union of $Bbb R times 0$ and $0 times Bbb R$. Let $pi : X to Bbb R$ be the projection map of the first coordinate restricted to $X$ . Prove that $pi$ is a closed map but not an open map.



I believe I can do the problem but I am facing difficulty in understanding what the underlying topology is i.e. whether it is the subspace topology or the product topology or something like the disjoint union topology.



So if someone suggest me what precisely are the open sets in X, then I could try the problem myself.



EDIT :



After considering the topology suggested in the comments, I have tried the problem.



$A := (x,y)in X: x=0, 1<y<2$ is an open set in $X$ since it can be obtained as (in particular) $(x,y)in X: -1 <x<1, 1<y<2 cap X$ with the former being open in $Bbb R^2$ . But, $pi(A) = 0$ and thus $pi(A)$ is closed in $Bbb R$ !



To show that $pi$ is a closed map, A closed set in $X$ is of the form $C^/ =C cap X$ where $C$ is a closed set in $Bbb R^2$ .Since a closed set in $Bbb R^2$ is of the form $C_1 times C_2$ where $C_1,C_2$ are closed in $Bbb R$.



Thus $pi(C^/)=pi(Ccap X)=pi((C_1 times C_2)cap X)= C_1$ which is closed in $Bbb R$ , so it's a closed map.



Can someone please check the proof and please point out mistakes.







share|cite|improve this question














I was trying to solve the following question :



Let $Xsubset Bbb R times Bbb R$ be the union of $Bbb R times 0$ and $0 times Bbb R$. Let $pi : X to Bbb R$ be the projection map of the first coordinate restricted to $X$ . Prove that $pi$ is a closed map but not an open map.



I believe I can do the problem but I am facing difficulty in understanding what the underlying topology is i.e. whether it is the subspace topology or the product topology or something like the disjoint union topology.



So if someone suggest me what precisely are the open sets in X, then I could try the problem myself.



EDIT :



After considering the topology suggested in the comments, I have tried the problem.



$A := (x,y)in X: x=0, 1<y<2$ is an open set in $X$ since it can be obtained as (in particular) $(x,y)in X: -1 <x<1, 1<y<2 cap X$ with the former being open in $Bbb R^2$ . But, $pi(A) = 0$ and thus $pi(A)$ is closed in $Bbb R$ !



To show that $pi$ is a closed map, A closed set in $X$ is of the form $C^/ =C cap X$ where $C$ is a closed set in $Bbb R^2$ .Since a closed set in $Bbb R^2$ is of the form $C_1 times C_2$ where $C_1,C_2$ are closed in $Bbb R$.



Thus $pi(C^/)=pi(Ccap X)=pi((C_1 times C_2)cap X)= C_1$ which is closed in $Bbb R$ , so it's a closed map.



Can someone please check the proof and please point out mistakes.









share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 15 at 8:46

























asked Aug 15 at 6:57









ThatIs

1,042423




1,042423







  • 3




    Unless otherwise stated, you assume $BbbRtimes BbbR=BbbR^2$ has the usual metric topology and $X$ has the subspace topology.
    – Oliver Jones
    Aug 15 at 7:02






  • 2




    By the way, the product topology on $BbbR^n$ coincides with the metric topology.
    – Oliver Jones
    Aug 15 at 7:04










  • So you mean the subspace topology inherited from the usual topology on $Bbb R^2$ ?
    – ThatIs
    Aug 15 at 7:06










  • Yes, there are no other possibilities.
    – Oliver Jones
    Aug 15 at 7:08












  • 3




    Unless otherwise stated, you assume $BbbRtimes BbbR=BbbR^2$ has the usual metric topology and $X$ has the subspace topology.
    – Oliver Jones
    Aug 15 at 7:02






  • 2




    By the way, the product topology on $BbbR^n$ coincides with the metric topology.
    – Oliver Jones
    Aug 15 at 7:04










  • So you mean the subspace topology inherited from the usual topology on $Bbb R^2$ ?
    – ThatIs
    Aug 15 at 7:06










  • Yes, there are no other possibilities.
    – Oliver Jones
    Aug 15 at 7:08







3




3




Unless otherwise stated, you assume $BbbRtimes BbbR=BbbR^2$ has the usual metric topology and $X$ has the subspace topology.
– Oliver Jones
Aug 15 at 7:02




Unless otherwise stated, you assume $BbbRtimes BbbR=BbbR^2$ has the usual metric topology and $X$ has the subspace topology.
– Oliver Jones
Aug 15 at 7:02




2




2




By the way, the product topology on $BbbR^n$ coincides with the metric topology.
– Oliver Jones
Aug 15 at 7:04




By the way, the product topology on $BbbR^n$ coincides with the metric topology.
– Oliver Jones
Aug 15 at 7:04












So you mean the subspace topology inherited from the usual topology on $Bbb R^2$ ?
– ThatIs
Aug 15 at 7:06




So you mean the subspace topology inherited from the usual topology on $Bbb R^2$ ?
– ThatIs
Aug 15 at 7:06












Yes, there are no other possibilities.
– Oliver Jones
Aug 15 at 7:08




Yes, there are no other possibilities.
– Oliver Jones
Aug 15 at 7:08










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted











and thus $pi(A)$ is closed in $Bbb R$ !




That's not what you were supposed to prove. You were supposed to show that $pi(A)$ is not open. Note that being closed is not equivalent to not being open. And indeed in every space $Y$ at least $emptyset$ and $Y$ are both open and closed. In connected spaces like $mathbbR$ or your $X$ these are only possibilites so your argument implies that $pi(A)$ is not open (because it is neither empty nor whole $X$). Note that you would need to prove that $X$ is connected (which is simple because there's an obvious path from anywhere to $(0,0)$).




Since a closed set in $Bbb R^2$ is of the form $C_1 times C_2$ where $C_1,C_2$ are closed in $Bbb R$.




This is wrong. Have a look at the closed ball $ x^2+y^2leq 1$. It is not of the form $C_1times C_2$.



The proper characterization is that every closed subset of $Atimes B$ is a complement of an open subset. And open susbsets of $Atimes B$ are of the form $bigcup_iU_itimes V_i$ where each $U_isubseteq A$ and $V_isubseteq B$ are open.



Also your argument is invalid because it doesn't consider $X$ at all. And note that not all projections are closed, e.g. for $X= xy=1$ the projection onto first coordinate is not closed. It maps closed subset $ xy=1; x<0$ onto $(-infty, 0)$ which is not closed.




Now back to your problem: let $pi:XtomathbbR$ be given by $pi(x,y)=x$. What you need to show is that $Csubseteq X$ is closed if and only if $C=C_1times0cup0times C_2$ where each $C_1,C_2subseteqmathbbR$ are closed (possibly empty). This is only because $X$ is what it is, it won't work for other definitions of $X$.



If $C_2$ is empty, then $pi(C_1times0)=C_1$ is obviously closed. On the other hand if $C_2$ is not empty then



$$pi(C)=pi(C_1times0cup0times C_2)=pi(C_1times0)cup0=C_1cup0$$



and thus it is closed in $mathbbR$.






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • X is convex? How is that ?
    – ThatIs
    Aug 15 at 11:05










  • @ThatIs Not convex, my mistake. I've meant star, i.e. there's a point that can be connected to any other point by straight line.
    – freakish
    Aug 15 at 11:09











  • Why is any open set in the product topology union of open sets like you've written? Why isn't it just collection of such $(U_i, V_i) $? Please explain.
    – ThatIs
    Aug 15 at 11:26










  • @ThatIs by the definition of product topology. Read this: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Product_topology Also have a look at an open ball. It is not a product of open sets (being cubes/squares) but it is open.
    – freakish
    Aug 15 at 11:37











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2883272%2fwhat-is-the-considered-topology-in-the-problem-and-proof-verification-pi-is%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
2
down vote



accepted











and thus $pi(A)$ is closed in $Bbb R$ !




That's not what you were supposed to prove. You were supposed to show that $pi(A)$ is not open. Note that being closed is not equivalent to not being open. And indeed in every space $Y$ at least $emptyset$ and $Y$ are both open and closed. In connected spaces like $mathbbR$ or your $X$ these are only possibilites so your argument implies that $pi(A)$ is not open (because it is neither empty nor whole $X$). Note that you would need to prove that $X$ is connected (which is simple because there's an obvious path from anywhere to $(0,0)$).




Since a closed set in $Bbb R^2$ is of the form $C_1 times C_2$ where $C_1,C_2$ are closed in $Bbb R$.




This is wrong. Have a look at the closed ball $ x^2+y^2leq 1$. It is not of the form $C_1times C_2$.



The proper characterization is that every closed subset of $Atimes B$ is a complement of an open subset. And open susbsets of $Atimes B$ are of the form $bigcup_iU_itimes V_i$ where each $U_isubseteq A$ and $V_isubseteq B$ are open.



Also your argument is invalid because it doesn't consider $X$ at all. And note that not all projections are closed, e.g. for $X= xy=1$ the projection onto first coordinate is not closed. It maps closed subset $ xy=1; x<0$ onto $(-infty, 0)$ which is not closed.




Now back to your problem: let $pi:XtomathbbR$ be given by $pi(x,y)=x$. What you need to show is that $Csubseteq X$ is closed if and only if $C=C_1times0cup0times C_2$ where each $C_1,C_2subseteqmathbbR$ are closed (possibly empty). This is only because $X$ is what it is, it won't work for other definitions of $X$.



If $C_2$ is empty, then $pi(C_1times0)=C_1$ is obviously closed. On the other hand if $C_2$ is not empty then



$$pi(C)=pi(C_1times0cup0times C_2)=pi(C_1times0)cup0=C_1cup0$$



and thus it is closed in $mathbbR$.






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • X is convex? How is that ?
    – ThatIs
    Aug 15 at 11:05










  • @ThatIs Not convex, my mistake. I've meant star, i.e. there's a point that can be connected to any other point by straight line.
    – freakish
    Aug 15 at 11:09











  • Why is any open set in the product topology union of open sets like you've written? Why isn't it just collection of such $(U_i, V_i) $? Please explain.
    – ThatIs
    Aug 15 at 11:26










  • @ThatIs by the definition of product topology. Read this: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Product_topology Also have a look at an open ball. It is not a product of open sets (being cubes/squares) but it is open.
    – freakish
    Aug 15 at 11:37















up vote
2
down vote



accepted











and thus $pi(A)$ is closed in $Bbb R$ !




That's not what you were supposed to prove. You were supposed to show that $pi(A)$ is not open. Note that being closed is not equivalent to not being open. And indeed in every space $Y$ at least $emptyset$ and $Y$ are both open and closed. In connected spaces like $mathbbR$ or your $X$ these are only possibilites so your argument implies that $pi(A)$ is not open (because it is neither empty nor whole $X$). Note that you would need to prove that $X$ is connected (which is simple because there's an obvious path from anywhere to $(0,0)$).




Since a closed set in $Bbb R^2$ is of the form $C_1 times C_2$ where $C_1,C_2$ are closed in $Bbb R$.




This is wrong. Have a look at the closed ball $ x^2+y^2leq 1$. It is not of the form $C_1times C_2$.



The proper characterization is that every closed subset of $Atimes B$ is a complement of an open subset. And open susbsets of $Atimes B$ are of the form $bigcup_iU_itimes V_i$ where each $U_isubseteq A$ and $V_isubseteq B$ are open.



Also your argument is invalid because it doesn't consider $X$ at all. And note that not all projections are closed, e.g. for $X= xy=1$ the projection onto first coordinate is not closed. It maps closed subset $ xy=1; x<0$ onto $(-infty, 0)$ which is not closed.




Now back to your problem: let $pi:XtomathbbR$ be given by $pi(x,y)=x$. What you need to show is that $Csubseteq X$ is closed if and only if $C=C_1times0cup0times C_2$ where each $C_1,C_2subseteqmathbbR$ are closed (possibly empty). This is only because $X$ is what it is, it won't work for other definitions of $X$.



If $C_2$ is empty, then $pi(C_1times0)=C_1$ is obviously closed. On the other hand if $C_2$ is not empty then



$$pi(C)=pi(C_1times0cup0times C_2)=pi(C_1times0)cup0=C_1cup0$$



and thus it is closed in $mathbbR$.






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • X is convex? How is that ?
    – ThatIs
    Aug 15 at 11:05










  • @ThatIs Not convex, my mistake. I've meant star, i.e. there's a point that can be connected to any other point by straight line.
    – freakish
    Aug 15 at 11:09











  • Why is any open set in the product topology union of open sets like you've written? Why isn't it just collection of such $(U_i, V_i) $? Please explain.
    – ThatIs
    Aug 15 at 11:26










  • @ThatIs by the definition of product topology. Read this: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Product_topology Also have a look at an open ball. It is not a product of open sets (being cubes/squares) but it is open.
    – freakish
    Aug 15 at 11:37













up vote
2
down vote



accepted







up vote
2
down vote



accepted







and thus $pi(A)$ is closed in $Bbb R$ !




That's not what you were supposed to prove. You were supposed to show that $pi(A)$ is not open. Note that being closed is not equivalent to not being open. And indeed in every space $Y$ at least $emptyset$ and $Y$ are both open and closed. In connected spaces like $mathbbR$ or your $X$ these are only possibilites so your argument implies that $pi(A)$ is not open (because it is neither empty nor whole $X$). Note that you would need to prove that $X$ is connected (which is simple because there's an obvious path from anywhere to $(0,0)$).




Since a closed set in $Bbb R^2$ is of the form $C_1 times C_2$ where $C_1,C_2$ are closed in $Bbb R$.




This is wrong. Have a look at the closed ball $ x^2+y^2leq 1$. It is not of the form $C_1times C_2$.



The proper characterization is that every closed subset of $Atimes B$ is a complement of an open subset. And open susbsets of $Atimes B$ are of the form $bigcup_iU_itimes V_i$ where each $U_isubseteq A$ and $V_isubseteq B$ are open.



Also your argument is invalid because it doesn't consider $X$ at all. And note that not all projections are closed, e.g. for $X= xy=1$ the projection onto first coordinate is not closed. It maps closed subset $ xy=1; x<0$ onto $(-infty, 0)$ which is not closed.




Now back to your problem: let $pi:XtomathbbR$ be given by $pi(x,y)=x$. What you need to show is that $Csubseteq X$ is closed if and only if $C=C_1times0cup0times C_2$ where each $C_1,C_2subseteqmathbbR$ are closed (possibly empty). This is only because $X$ is what it is, it won't work for other definitions of $X$.



If $C_2$ is empty, then $pi(C_1times0)=C_1$ is obviously closed. On the other hand if $C_2$ is not empty then



$$pi(C)=pi(C_1times0cup0times C_2)=pi(C_1times0)cup0=C_1cup0$$



and thus it is closed in $mathbbR$.






share|cite|improve this answer















and thus $pi(A)$ is closed in $Bbb R$ !




That's not what you were supposed to prove. You were supposed to show that $pi(A)$ is not open. Note that being closed is not equivalent to not being open. And indeed in every space $Y$ at least $emptyset$ and $Y$ are both open and closed. In connected spaces like $mathbbR$ or your $X$ these are only possibilites so your argument implies that $pi(A)$ is not open (because it is neither empty nor whole $X$). Note that you would need to prove that $X$ is connected (which is simple because there's an obvious path from anywhere to $(0,0)$).




Since a closed set in $Bbb R^2$ is of the form $C_1 times C_2$ where $C_1,C_2$ are closed in $Bbb R$.




This is wrong. Have a look at the closed ball $ x^2+y^2leq 1$. It is not of the form $C_1times C_2$.



The proper characterization is that every closed subset of $Atimes B$ is a complement of an open subset. And open susbsets of $Atimes B$ are of the form $bigcup_iU_itimes V_i$ where each $U_isubseteq A$ and $V_isubseteq B$ are open.



Also your argument is invalid because it doesn't consider $X$ at all. And note that not all projections are closed, e.g. for $X= xy=1$ the projection onto first coordinate is not closed. It maps closed subset $ xy=1; x<0$ onto $(-infty, 0)$ which is not closed.




Now back to your problem: let $pi:XtomathbbR$ be given by $pi(x,y)=x$. What you need to show is that $Csubseteq X$ is closed if and only if $C=C_1times0cup0times C_2$ where each $C_1,C_2subseteqmathbbR$ are closed (possibly empty). This is only because $X$ is what it is, it won't work for other definitions of $X$.



If $C_2$ is empty, then $pi(C_1times0)=C_1$ is obviously closed. On the other hand if $C_2$ is not empty then



$$pi(C)=pi(C_1times0cup0times C_2)=pi(C_1times0)cup0=C_1cup0$$



and thus it is closed in $mathbbR$.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Aug 15 at 15:46

























answered Aug 15 at 10:58









freakish

8,6971524




8,6971524











  • X is convex? How is that ?
    – ThatIs
    Aug 15 at 11:05










  • @ThatIs Not convex, my mistake. I've meant star, i.e. there's a point that can be connected to any other point by straight line.
    – freakish
    Aug 15 at 11:09











  • Why is any open set in the product topology union of open sets like you've written? Why isn't it just collection of such $(U_i, V_i) $? Please explain.
    – ThatIs
    Aug 15 at 11:26










  • @ThatIs by the definition of product topology. Read this: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Product_topology Also have a look at an open ball. It is not a product of open sets (being cubes/squares) but it is open.
    – freakish
    Aug 15 at 11:37

















  • X is convex? How is that ?
    – ThatIs
    Aug 15 at 11:05










  • @ThatIs Not convex, my mistake. I've meant star, i.e. there's a point that can be connected to any other point by straight line.
    – freakish
    Aug 15 at 11:09











  • Why is any open set in the product topology union of open sets like you've written? Why isn't it just collection of such $(U_i, V_i) $? Please explain.
    – ThatIs
    Aug 15 at 11:26










  • @ThatIs by the definition of product topology. Read this: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Product_topology Also have a look at an open ball. It is not a product of open sets (being cubes/squares) but it is open.
    – freakish
    Aug 15 at 11:37
















X is convex? How is that ?
– ThatIs
Aug 15 at 11:05




X is convex? How is that ?
– ThatIs
Aug 15 at 11:05












@ThatIs Not convex, my mistake. I've meant star, i.e. there's a point that can be connected to any other point by straight line.
– freakish
Aug 15 at 11:09





@ThatIs Not convex, my mistake. I've meant star, i.e. there's a point that can be connected to any other point by straight line.
– freakish
Aug 15 at 11:09













Why is any open set in the product topology union of open sets like you've written? Why isn't it just collection of such $(U_i, V_i) $? Please explain.
– ThatIs
Aug 15 at 11:26




Why is any open set in the product topology union of open sets like you've written? Why isn't it just collection of such $(U_i, V_i) $? Please explain.
– ThatIs
Aug 15 at 11:26












@ThatIs by the definition of product topology. Read this: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Product_topology Also have a look at an open ball. It is not a product of open sets (being cubes/squares) but it is open.
– freakish
Aug 15 at 11:37





@ThatIs by the definition of product topology. Read this: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Product_topology Also have a look at an open ball. It is not a product of open sets (being cubes/squares) but it is open.
– freakish
Aug 15 at 11:37













 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2883272%2fwhat-is-the-considered-topology-in-the-problem-and-proof-verification-pi-is%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

Propositional logic and tautologies

Distribution of Stopped Wiener Process with Stochastic Volatility