Riemannian holonomy of a covering

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
5
down vote

favorite












Suppose I have a connected Riemannian manifold $X$ and a covering $pi:Yto X$ with the pulled back metric on $Y$, making $pi$ into a local isometry between Riemannian manifolds.



Suppose we have a closed loop in $Y$ based at a point $yin Y$. This will give rise to an element of the holonomy group $mathrmHol_y(Y)$, which after we fix a basis of $T_yY$ becomes an element of $mathrmGL(n)$ (or $mathrm O(n)$ really).



If we project the path to $X$, we get a closed loop again, hence an element of $mathrmHol_xX$, where $x = pi(y)$, and by using $pi$ to map the basis of $T_yY$ to one of $T_xX$ this becomes an element of $mathrmGL(n)$ as well, and we can talk about equality in a sensible way.



Since all along the paths the geometry is identical (around every point there is a neighbourhood on which $pi$ induces an isometry) it seems clear that they must induce the same element in holonomy.



This would mean that the holonomy of $Y$ is a subgroup of the holonomy of $X$.



This inclusion can be strict, if $X$ is not orientable for example, its holonomy group might be $mathrm O(n)$, but if we take $Y$ to be its oriented double cover its holonomy must be contained in $mathrmSO(n)$.



Can anything more precise be said about the relation between the holonomy groups of $X$ and of $Y$? I would expect the fundamental group or rather the group of deck transformations to play a role, but I don't know in what form.



Thanks!







share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    5
    down vote

    favorite












    Suppose I have a connected Riemannian manifold $X$ and a covering $pi:Yto X$ with the pulled back metric on $Y$, making $pi$ into a local isometry between Riemannian manifolds.



    Suppose we have a closed loop in $Y$ based at a point $yin Y$. This will give rise to an element of the holonomy group $mathrmHol_y(Y)$, which after we fix a basis of $T_yY$ becomes an element of $mathrmGL(n)$ (or $mathrm O(n)$ really).



    If we project the path to $X$, we get a closed loop again, hence an element of $mathrmHol_xX$, where $x = pi(y)$, and by using $pi$ to map the basis of $T_yY$ to one of $T_xX$ this becomes an element of $mathrmGL(n)$ as well, and we can talk about equality in a sensible way.



    Since all along the paths the geometry is identical (around every point there is a neighbourhood on which $pi$ induces an isometry) it seems clear that they must induce the same element in holonomy.



    This would mean that the holonomy of $Y$ is a subgroup of the holonomy of $X$.



    This inclusion can be strict, if $X$ is not orientable for example, its holonomy group might be $mathrm O(n)$, but if we take $Y$ to be its oriented double cover its holonomy must be contained in $mathrmSO(n)$.



    Can anything more precise be said about the relation between the holonomy groups of $X$ and of $Y$? I would expect the fundamental group or rather the group of deck transformations to play a role, but I don't know in what form.



    Thanks!







    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      5
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      5
      down vote

      favorite











      Suppose I have a connected Riemannian manifold $X$ and a covering $pi:Yto X$ with the pulled back metric on $Y$, making $pi$ into a local isometry between Riemannian manifolds.



      Suppose we have a closed loop in $Y$ based at a point $yin Y$. This will give rise to an element of the holonomy group $mathrmHol_y(Y)$, which after we fix a basis of $T_yY$ becomes an element of $mathrmGL(n)$ (or $mathrm O(n)$ really).



      If we project the path to $X$, we get a closed loop again, hence an element of $mathrmHol_xX$, where $x = pi(y)$, and by using $pi$ to map the basis of $T_yY$ to one of $T_xX$ this becomes an element of $mathrmGL(n)$ as well, and we can talk about equality in a sensible way.



      Since all along the paths the geometry is identical (around every point there is a neighbourhood on which $pi$ induces an isometry) it seems clear that they must induce the same element in holonomy.



      This would mean that the holonomy of $Y$ is a subgroup of the holonomy of $X$.



      This inclusion can be strict, if $X$ is not orientable for example, its holonomy group might be $mathrm O(n)$, but if we take $Y$ to be its oriented double cover its holonomy must be contained in $mathrmSO(n)$.



      Can anything more precise be said about the relation between the holonomy groups of $X$ and of $Y$? I would expect the fundamental group or rather the group of deck transformations to play a role, but I don't know in what form.



      Thanks!







      share|cite|improve this question














      Suppose I have a connected Riemannian manifold $X$ and a covering $pi:Yto X$ with the pulled back metric on $Y$, making $pi$ into a local isometry between Riemannian manifolds.



      Suppose we have a closed loop in $Y$ based at a point $yin Y$. This will give rise to an element of the holonomy group $mathrmHol_y(Y)$, which after we fix a basis of $T_yY$ becomes an element of $mathrmGL(n)$ (or $mathrm O(n)$ really).



      If we project the path to $X$, we get a closed loop again, hence an element of $mathrmHol_xX$, where $x = pi(y)$, and by using $pi$ to map the basis of $T_yY$ to one of $T_xX$ this becomes an element of $mathrmGL(n)$ as well, and we can talk about equality in a sensible way.



      Since all along the paths the geometry is identical (around every point there is a neighbourhood on which $pi$ induces an isometry) it seems clear that they must induce the same element in holonomy.



      This would mean that the holonomy of $Y$ is a subgroup of the holonomy of $X$.



      This inclusion can be strict, if $X$ is not orientable for example, its holonomy group might be $mathrm O(n)$, but if we take $Y$ to be its oriented double cover its holonomy must be contained in $mathrmSO(n)$.



      Can anything more precise be said about the relation between the holonomy groups of $X$ and of $Y$? I would expect the fundamental group or rather the group of deck transformations to play a role, but I don't know in what form.



      Thanks!









      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Aug 15 at 11:07

























      asked Aug 15 at 9:24









      doetoe

      1,078710




      1,078710




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          $rm Hol(Y)$ is indeed a subgroup of $rm Hol(X)$. The fundamental group introduces connected components to the holonomy; that is, there is a surjection $pi_1(X)torm Hol(X)/rm Hol(X)^circ=rm Hol(X)/rm Hol(tildeX)$ (with $tildeX$ being the universal cover). I'm not aware that this can be made more precise in general (if you read German, have a look at Helga Baum's book "Eichfeldtheorie", Section 5.1; can't think of a good English reference now, but something on this is probably in Kobayashi & Nomizu, Book I).



          Example: For a complete flat manifold $X$, the fundamental group is a group of affine transformations on $tildeX=mathbbR^n$. The (linear) holonomy group is then given by the projection to the linear parts of the fundamental group
          (e.g. Joe Wolf's book "Spaces of constant curvature", Chapter 3).



          Hope this helped.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • Thanks, I'll check out your references!
            – doetoe
            Aug 22 at 20:29










          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2883390%2friemannian-holonomy-of-a-covering%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          $rm Hol(Y)$ is indeed a subgroup of $rm Hol(X)$. The fundamental group introduces connected components to the holonomy; that is, there is a surjection $pi_1(X)torm Hol(X)/rm Hol(X)^circ=rm Hol(X)/rm Hol(tildeX)$ (with $tildeX$ being the universal cover). I'm not aware that this can be made more precise in general (if you read German, have a look at Helga Baum's book "Eichfeldtheorie", Section 5.1; can't think of a good English reference now, but something on this is probably in Kobayashi & Nomizu, Book I).



          Example: For a complete flat manifold $X$, the fundamental group is a group of affine transformations on $tildeX=mathbbR^n$. The (linear) holonomy group is then given by the projection to the linear parts of the fundamental group
          (e.g. Joe Wolf's book "Spaces of constant curvature", Chapter 3).



          Hope this helped.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • Thanks, I'll check out your references!
            – doetoe
            Aug 22 at 20:29














          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          $rm Hol(Y)$ is indeed a subgroup of $rm Hol(X)$. The fundamental group introduces connected components to the holonomy; that is, there is a surjection $pi_1(X)torm Hol(X)/rm Hol(X)^circ=rm Hol(X)/rm Hol(tildeX)$ (with $tildeX$ being the universal cover). I'm not aware that this can be made more precise in general (if you read German, have a look at Helga Baum's book "Eichfeldtheorie", Section 5.1; can't think of a good English reference now, but something on this is probably in Kobayashi & Nomizu, Book I).



          Example: For a complete flat manifold $X$, the fundamental group is a group of affine transformations on $tildeX=mathbbR^n$. The (linear) holonomy group is then given by the projection to the linear parts of the fundamental group
          (e.g. Joe Wolf's book "Spaces of constant curvature", Chapter 3).



          Hope this helped.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • Thanks, I'll check out your references!
            – doetoe
            Aug 22 at 20:29












          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted






          $rm Hol(Y)$ is indeed a subgroup of $rm Hol(X)$. The fundamental group introduces connected components to the holonomy; that is, there is a surjection $pi_1(X)torm Hol(X)/rm Hol(X)^circ=rm Hol(X)/rm Hol(tildeX)$ (with $tildeX$ being the universal cover). I'm not aware that this can be made more precise in general (if you read German, have a look at Helga Baum's book "Eichfeldtheorie", Section 5.1; can't think of a good English reference now, but something on this is probably in Kobayashi & Nomizu, Book I).



          Example: For a complete flat manifold $X$, the fundamental group is a group of affine transformations on $tildeX=mathbbR^n$. The (linear) holonomy group is then given by the projection to the linear parts of the fundamental group
          (e.g. Joe Wolf's book "Spaces of constant curvature", Chapter 3).



          Hope this helped.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          $rm Hol(Y)$ is indeed a subgroup of $rm Hol(X)$. The fundamental group introduces connected components to the holonomy; that is, there is a surjection $pi_1(X)torm Hol(X)/rm Hol(X)^circ=rm Hol(X)/rm Hol(tildeX)$ (with $tildeX$ being the universal cover). I'm not aware that this can be made more precise in general (if you read German, have a look at Helga Baum's book "Eichfeldtheorie", Section 5.1; can't think of a good English reference now, but something on this is probably in Kobayashi & Nomizu, Book I).



          Example: For a complete flat manifold $X$, the fundamental group is a group of affine transformations on $tildeX=mathbbR^n$. The (linear) holonomy group is then given by the projection to the linear parts of the fundamental group
          (e.g. Joe Wolf's book "Spaces of constant curvature", Chapter 3).



          Hope this helped.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Aug 21 at 2:40









          Wolfgang Globke

          362




          362











          • Thanks, I'll check out your references!
            – doetoe
            Aug 22 at 20:29
















          • Thanks, I'll check out your references!
            – doetoe
            Aug 22 at 20:29















          Thanks, I'll check out your references!
          – doetoe
          Aug 22 at 20:29




          Thanks, I'll check out your references!
          – doetoe
          Aug 22 at 20:29












           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2883390%2friemannian-holonomy-of-a-covering%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

          Propositional logic and tautologies

          Distribution of Stopped Wiener Process with Stochastic Volatility