Riemannian holonomy of a covering
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
Suppose I have a connected Riemannian manifold $X$ and a covering $pi:Yto X$ with the pulled back metric on $Y$, making $pi$ into a local isometry between Riemannian manifolds.
Suppose we have a closed loop in $Y$ based at a point $yin Y$. This will give rise to an element of the holonomy group $mathrmHol_y(Y)$, which after we fix a basis of $T_yY$ becomes an element of $mathrmGL(n)$ (or $mathrm O(n)$ really).
If we project the path to $X$, we get a closed loop again, hence an element of $mathrmHol_xX$, where $x = pi(y)$, and by using $pi$ to map the basis of $T_yY$ to one of $T_xX$ this becomes an element of $mathrmGL(n)$ as well, and we can talk about equality in a sensible way.
Since all along the paths the geometry is identical (around every point there is a neighbourhood on which $pi$ induces an isometry) it seems clear that they must induce the same element in holonomy.
This would mean that the holonomy of $Y$ is a subgroup of the holonomy of $X$.
This inclusion can be strict, if $X$ is not orientable for example, its holonomy group might be $mathrm O(n)$, but if we take $Y$ to be its oriented double cover its holonomy must be contained in $mathrmSO(n)$.
Can anything more precise be said about the relation between the holonomy groups of $X$ and of $Y$? I would expect the fundamental group or rather the group of deck transformations to play a role, but I don't know in what form.
Thanks!
differential-geometry curvature covering-spaces holonomy
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
Suppose I have a connected Riemannian manifold $X$ and a covering $pi:Yto X$ with the pulled back metric on $Y$, making $pi$ into a local isometry between Riemannian manifolds.
Suppose we have a closed loop in $Y$ based at a point $yin Y$. This will give rise to an element of the holonomy group $mathrmHol_y(Y)$, which after we fix a basis of $T_yY$ becomes an element of $mathrmGL(n)$ (or $mathrm O(n)$ really).
If we project the path to $X$, we get a closed loop again, hence an element of $mathrmHol_xX$, where $x = pi(y)$, and by using $pi$ to map the basis of $T_yY$ to one of $T_xX$ this becomes an element of $mathrmGL(n)$ as well, and we can talk about equality in a sensible way.
Since all along the paths the geometry is identical (around every point there is a neighbourhood on which $pi$ induces an isometry) it seems clear that they must induce the same element in holonomy.
This would mean that the holonomy of $Y$ is a subgroup of the holonomy of $X$.
This inclusion can be strict, if $X$ is not orientable for example, its holonomy group might be $mathrm O(n)$, but if we take $Y$ to be its oriented double cover its holonomy must be contained in $mathrmSO(n)$.
Can anything more precise be said about the relation between the holonomy groups of $X$ and of $Y$? I would expect the fundamental group or rather the group of deck transformations to play a role, but I don't know in what form.
Thanks!
differential-geometry curvature covering-spaces holonomy
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
Suppose I have a connected Riemannian manifold $X$ and a covering $pi:Yto X$ with the pulled back metric on $Y$, making $pi$ into a local isometry between Riemannian manifolds.
Suppose we have a closed loop in $Y$ based at a point $yin Y$. This will give rise to an element of the holonomy group $mathrmHol_y(Y)$, which after we fix a basis of $T_yY$ becomes an element of $mathrmGL(n)$ (or $mathrm O(n)$ really).
If we project the path to $X$, we get a closed loop again, hence an element of $mathrmHol_xX$, where $x = pi(y)$, and by using $pi$ to map the basis of $T_yY$ to one of $T_xX$ this becomes an element of $mathrmGL(n)$ as well, and we can talk about equality in a sensible way.
Since all along the paths the geometry is identical (around every point there is a neighbourhood on which $pi$ induces an isometry) it seems clear that they must induce the same element in holonomy.
This would mean that the holonomy of $Y$ is a subgroup of the holonomy of $X$.
This inclusion can be strict, if $X$ is not orientable for example, its holonomy group might be $mathrm O(n)$, but if we take $Y$ to be its oriented double cover its holonomy must be contained in $mathrmSO(n)$.
Can anything more precise be said about the relation between the holonomy groups of $X$ and of $Y$? I would expect the fundamental group or rather the group of deck transformations to play a role, but I don't know in what form.
Thanks!
differential-geometry curvature covering-spaces holonomy
Suppose I have a connected Riemannian manifold $X$ and a covering $pi:Yto X$ with the pulled back metric on $Y$, making $pi$ into a local isometry between Riemannian manifolds.
Suppose we have a closed loop in $Y$ based at a point $yin Y$. This will give rise to an element of the holonomy group $mathrmHol_y(Y)$, which after we fix a basis of $T_yY$ becomes an element of $mathrmGL(n)$ (or $mathrm O(n)$ really).
If we project the path to $X$, we get a closed loop again, hence an element of $mathrmHol_xX$, where $x = pi(y)$, and by using $pi$ to map the basis of $T_yY$ to one of $T_xX$ this becomes an element of $mathrmGL(n)$ as well, and we can talk about equality in a sensible way.
Since all along the paths the geometry is identical (around every point there is a neighbourhood on which $pi$ induces an isometry) it seems clear that they must induce the same element in holonomy.
This would mean that the holonomy of $Y$ is a subgroup of the holonomy of $X$.
This inclusion can be strict, if $X$ is not orientable for example, its holonomy group might be $mathrm O(n)$, but if we take $Y$ to be its oriented double cover its holonomy must be contained in $mathrmSO(n)$.
Can anything more precise be said about the relation between the holonomy groups of $X$ and of $Y$? I would expect the fundamental group or rather the group of deck transformations to play a role, but I don't know in what form.
Thanks!
differential-geometry curvature covering-spaces holonomy
edited Aug 15 at 11:07
asked Aug 15 at 9:24
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/759bc/759bcfdcc88a42304ee87b0e8d7e9b1e9ed7263d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/759bc/759bcfdcc88a42304ee87b0e8d7e9b1e9ed7263d" alt=""
doetoe
1,078710
1,078710
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
$rm Hol(Y)$ is indeed a subgroup of $rm Hol(X)$. The fundamental group introduces connected components to the holonomy; that is, there is a surjection $pi_1(X)torm Hol(X)/rm Hol(X)^circ=rm Hol(X)/rm Hol(tildeX)$ (with $tildeX$ being the universal cover). I'm not aware that this can be made more precise in general (if you read German, have a look at Helga Baum's book "Eichfeldtheorie", Section 5.1; can't think of a good English reference now, but something on this is probably in Kobayashi & Nomizu, Book I).
Example: For a complete flat manifold $X$, the fundamental group is a group of affine transformations on $tildeX=mathbbR^n$. The (linear) holonomy group is then given by the projection to the linear parts of the fundamental group
(e.g. Joe Wolf's book "Spaces of constant curvature", Chapter 3).
Hope this helped.
Thanks, I'll check out your references!
â doetoe
Aug 22 at 20:29
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
$rm Hol(Y)$ is indeed a subgroup of $rm Hol(X)$. The fundamental group introduces connected components to the holonomy; that is, there is a surjection $pi_1(X)torm Hol(X)/rm Hol(X)^circ=rm Hol(X)/rm Hol(tildeX)$ (with $tildeX$ being the universal cover). I'm not aware that this can be made more precise in general (if you read German, have a look at Helga Baum's book "Eichfeldtheorie", Section 5.1; can't think of a good English reference now, but something on this is probably in Kobayashi & Nomizu, Book I).
Example: For a complete flat manifold $X$, the fundamental group is a group of affine transformations on $tildeX=mathbbR^n$. The (linear) holonomy group is then given by the projection to the linear parts of the fundamental group
(e.g. Joe Wolf's book "Spaces of constant curvature", Chapter 3).
Hope this helped.
Thanks, I'll check out your references!
â doetoe
Aug 22 at 20:29
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
$rm Hol(Y)$ is indeed a subgroup of $rm Hol(X)$. The fundamental group introduces connected components to the holonomy; that is, there is a surjection $pi_1(X)torm Hol(X)/rm Hol(X)^circ=rm Hol(X)/rm Hol(tildeX)$ (with $tildeX$ being the universal cover). I'm not aware that this can be made more precise in general (if you read German, have a look at Helga Baum's book "Eichfeldtheorie", Section 5.1; can't think of a good English reference now, but something on this is probably in Kobayashi & Nomizu, Book I).
Example: For a complete flat manifold $X$, the fundamental group is a group of affine transformations on $tildeX=mathbbR^n$. The (linear) holonomy group is then given by the projection to the linear parts of the fundamental group
(e.g. Joe Wolf's book "Spaces of constant curvature", Chapter 3).
Hope this helped.
Thanks, I'll check out your references!
â doetoe
Aug 22 at 20:29
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
$rm Hol(Y)$ is indeed a subgroup of $rm Hol(X)$. The fundamental group introduces connected components to the holonomy; that is, there is a surjection $pi_1(X)torm Hol(X)/rm Hol(X)^circ=rm Hol(X)/rm Hol(tildeX)$ (with $tildeX$ being the universal cover). I'm not aware that this can be made more precise in general (if you read German, have a look at Helga Baum's book "Eichfeldtheorie", Section 5.1; can't think of a good English reference now, but something on this is probably in Kobayashi & Nomizu, Book I).
Example: For a complete flat manifold $X$, the fundamental group is a group of affine transformations on $tildeX=mathbbR^n$. The (linear) holonomy group is then given by the projection to the linear parts of the fundamental group
(e.g. Joe Wolf's book "Spaces of constant curvature", Chapter 3).
Hope this helped.
$rm Hol(Y)$ is indeed a subgroup of $rm Hol(X)$. The fundamental group introduces connected components to the holonomy; that is, there is a surjection $pi_1(X)torm Hol(X)/rm Hol(X)^circ=rm Hol(X)/rm Hol(tildeX)$ (with $tildeX$ being the universal cover). I'm not aware that this can be made more precise in general (if you read German, have a look at Helga Baum's book "Eichfeldtheorie", Section 5.1; can't think of a good English reference now, but something on this is probably in Kobayashi & Nomizu, Book I).
Example: For a complete flat manifold $X$, the fundamental group is a group of affine transformations on $tildeX=mathbbR^n$. The (linear) holonomy group is then given by the projection to the linear parts of the fundamental group
(e.g. Joe Wolf's book "Spaces of constant curvature", Chapter 3).
Hope this helped.
answered Aug 21 at 2:40
Wolfgang Globke
362
362
Thanks, I'll check out your references!
â doetoe
Aug 22 at 20:29
add a comment |Â
Thanks, I'll check out your references!
â doetoe
Aug 22 at 20:29
Thanks, I'll check out your references!
â doetoe
Aug 22 at 20:29
Thanks, I'll check out your references!
â doetoe
Aug 22 at 20:29
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2883390%2friemannian-holonomy-of-a-covering%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password