Is there an easy way to show that this function satisfies Cauchy Riemann equations at $z=0$

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












Let



$$ f(z) = left{ beginalign
&e^-frac1z^4 &hspace1mm mboxif hspace1mm z neq 0 \
&0 &hspace1mm mboxif hspace1mm z = 0 \
endalign right. $$



I want to show that this equation satisfies, CR equations at $z=0$



Let $z=x+iy$ where $x,yinmathbbR$. Then
$$frac1z=fracx-iyx^2+y^2.$$



I get the following expression.



$$e^-fracx^4+y^4-6x^2y^2(x^2+y^2)^4left(cosleft(frac4xy^3-4x^3y(x^2+y^2)^4 right)-i sinleft(frac4xy^3-4x^3y(x^2+y^2)^4 right)right)$$



I have shown that this function satisfies CR equation, but is very tedious.



Is there a more elegant and beautiful way? Or Is this the only way possible.







share|cite|improve this question
















  • 1




    Just an idea: have you tried polar coordinates?
    – Andrei
    Aug 15 at 4:10










  • No. Not yet. My notes does not mention anything like that. Let me Google it.
    – Mathaman Topologius
    Aug 15 at 4:11






  • 1




    Polar coordinates CR equations assume $rne 0$. I am not sure if they are applicable here.
    – Szeto
    Aug 15 at 4:26










  • Look equations 18 and 19 mathworld.wolfram.com/Cauchy-RiemannEquations.html
    – David
    Aug 15 at 5:28















up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












Let



$$ f(z) = left{ beginalign
&e^-frac1z^4 &hspace1mm mboxif hspace1mm z neq 0 \
&0 &hspace1mm mboxif hspace1mm z = 0 \
endalign right. $$



I want to show that this equation satisfies, CR equations at $z=0$



Let $z=x+iy$ where $x,yinmathbbR$. Then
$$frac1z=fracx-iyx^2+y^2.$$



I get the following expression.



$$e^-fracx^4+y^4-6x^2y^2(x^2+y^2)^4left(cosleft(frac4xy^3-4x^3y(x^2+y^2)^4 right)-i sinleft(frac4xy^3-4x^3y(x^2+y^2)^4 right)right)$$



I have shown that this function satisfies CR equation, but is very tedious.



Is there a more elegant and beautiful way? Or Is this the only way possible.







share|cite|improve this question
















  • 1




    Just an idea: have you tried polar coordinates?
    – Andrei
    Aug 15 at 4:10










  • No. Not yet. My notes does not mention anything like that. Let me Google it.
    – Mathaman Topologius
    Aug 15 at 4:11






  • 1




    Polar coordinates CR equations assume $rne 0$. I am not sure if they are applicable here.
    – Szeto
    Aug 15 at 4:26










  • Look equations 18 and 19 mathworld.wolfram.com/Cauchy-RiemannEquations.html
    – David
    Aug 15 at 5:28













up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1






1





Let



$$ f(z) = left{ beginalign
&e^-frac1z^4 &hspace1mm mboxif hspace1mm z neq 0 \
&0 &hspace1mm mboxif hspace1mm z = 0 \
endalign right. $$



I want to show that this equation satisfies, CR equations at $z=0$



Let $z=x+iy$ where $x,yinmathbbR$. Then
$$frac1z=fracx-iyx^2+y^2.$$



I get the following expression.



$$e^-fracx^4+y^4-6x^2y^2(x^2+y^2)^4left(cosleft(frac4xy^3-4x^3y(x^2+y^2)^4 right)-i sinleft(frac4xy^3-4x^3y(x^2+y^2)^4 right)right)$$



I have shown that this function satisfies CR equation, but is very tedious.



Is there a more elegant and beautiful way? Or Is this the only way possible.







share|cite|improve this question












Let



$$ f(z) = left{ beginalign
&e^-frac1z^4 &hspace1mm mboxif hspace1mm z neq 0 \
&0 &hspace1mm mboxif hspace1mm z = 0 \
endalign right. $$



I want to show that this equation satisfies, CR equations at $z=0$



Let $z=x+iy$ where $x,yinmathbbR$. Then
$$frac1z=fracx-iyx^2+y^2.$$



I get the following expression.



$$e^-fracx^4+y^4-6x^2y^2(x^2+y^2)^4left(cosleft(frac4xy^3-4x^3y(x^2+y^2)^4 right)-i sinleft(frac4xy^3-4x^3y(x^2+y^2)^4 right)right)$$



I have shown that this function satisfies CR equation, but is very tedious.



Is there a more elegant and beautiful way? Or Is this the only way possible.









share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Aug 15 at 3:58









Mathaman Topologius

83




83







  • 1




    Just an idea: have you tried polar coordinates?
    – Andrei
    Aug 15 at 4:10










  • No. Not yet. My notes does not mention anything like that. Let me Google it.
    – Mathaman Topologius
    Aug 15 at 4:11






  • 1




    Polar coordinates CR equations assume $rne 0$. I am not sure if they are applicable here.
    – Szeto
    Aug 15 at 4:26










  • Look equations 18 and 19 mathworld.wolfram.com/Cauchy-RiemannEquations.html
    – David
    Aug 15 at 5:28













  • 1




    Just an idea: have you tried polar coordinates?
    – Andrei
    Aug 15 at 4:10










  • No. Not yet. My notes does not mention anything like that. Let me Google it.
    – Mathaman Topologius
    Aug 15 at 4:11






  • 1




    Polar coordinates CR equations assume $rne 0$. I am not sure if they are applicable here.
    – Szeto
    Aug 15 at 4:26










  • Look equations 18 and 19 mathworld.wolfram.com/Cauchy-RiemannEquations.html
    – David
    Aug 15 at 5:28








1




1




Just an idea: have you tried polar coordinates?
– Andrei
Aug 15 at 4:10




Just an idea: have you tried polar coordinates?
– Andrei
Aug 15 at 4:10












No. Not yet. My notes does not mention anything like that. Let me Google it.
– Mathaman Topologius
Aug 15 at 4:11




No. Not yet. My notes does not mention anything like that. Let me Google it.
– Mathaman Topologius
Aug 15 at 4:11




1




1




Polar coordinates CR equations assume $rne 0$. I am not sure if they are applicable here.
– Szeto
Aug 15 at 4:26




Polar coordinates CR equations assume $rne 0$. I am not sure if they are applicable here.
– Szeto
Aug 15 at 4:26












Look equations 18 and 19 mathworld.wolfram.com/Cauchy-RiemannEquations.html
– David
Aug 15 at 5:28





Look equations 18 and 19 mathworld.wolfram.com/Cauchy-RiemannEquations.html
– David
Aug 15 at 5:28











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













For $z = x in Bbb R$, $x ne 0$ is $f(z) = e^-1/x^4$ purely real,
so that
$$
beginaligned
u(x, 0) &= e^-1/x^4 \ v(x, 0) &= 0
endaligned
$$
and therefore
$$
beginaligned
u_x(0, 0) &= lim_x to 0 fracu(x, 0)-u(0, 0)x - 0
= lim_x to 0 frace^-1/x^4x
= lim_t to infty fracte^t^4 = 0 \
v_x(0, 0) &= 0 , .
endaligned
$$
In a similar way you can show that
$$
u_y(0, 0) = v_y(0, 0) = 0 , .
$$
All partial derivatives are zero at $z=0$, so that the Cauchy-Riemann
equations are satisfied at that point.






share|cite|improve this answer




















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );








     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2883176%2fis-there-an-easy-way-to-show-that-this-function-satisfies-cauchy-riemann-equatio%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote













    For $z = x in Bbb R$, $x ne 0$ is $f(z) = e^-1/x^4$ purely real,
    so that
    $$
    beginaligned
    u(x, 0) &= e^-1/x^4 \ v(x, 0) &= 0
    endaligned
    $$
    and therefore
    $$
    beginaligned
    u_x(0, 0) &= lim_x to 0 fracu(x, 0)-u(0, 0)x - 0
    = lim_x to 0 frace^-1/x^4x
    = lim_t to infty fracte^t^4 = 0 \
    v_x(0, 0) &= 0 , .
    endaligned
    $$
    In a similar way you can show that
    $$
    u_y(0, 0) = v_y(0, 0) = 0 , .
    $$
    All partial derivatives are zero at $z=0$, so that the Cauchy-Riemann
    equations are satisfied at that point.






    share|cite|improve this answer
























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      For $z = x in Bbb R$, $x ne 0$ is $f(z) = e^-1/x^4$ purely real,
      so that
      $$
      beginaligned
      u(x, 0) &= e^-1/x^4 \ v(x, 0) &= 0
      endaligned
      $$
      and therefore
      $$
      beginaligned
      u_x(0, 0) &= lim_x to 0 fracu(x, 0)-u(0, 0)x - 0
      = lim_x to 0 frace^-1/x^4x
      = lim_t to infty fracte^t^4 = 0 \
      v_x(0, 0) &= 0 , .
      endaligned
      $$
      In a similar way you can show that
      $$
      u_y(0, 0) = v_y(0, 0) = 0 , .
      $$
      All partial derivatives are zero at $z=0$, so that the Cauchy-Riemann
      equations are satisfied at that point.






      share|cite|improve this answer






















        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        For $z = x in Bbb R$, $x ne 0$ is $f(z) = e^-1/x^4$ purely real,
        so that
        $$
        beginaligned
        u(x, 0) &= e^-1/x^4 \ v(x, 0) &= 0
        endaligned
        $$
        and therefore
        $$
        beginaligned
        u_x(0, 0) &= lim_x to 0 fracu(x, 0)-u(0, 0)x - 0
        = lim_x to 0 frace^-1/x^4x
        = lim_t to infty fracte^t^4 = 0 \
        v_x(0, 0) &= 0 , .
        endaligned
        $$
        In a similar way you can show that
        $$
        u_y(0, 0) = v_y(0, 0) = 0 , .
        $$
        All partial derivatives are zero at $z=0$, so that the Cauchy-Riemann
        equations are satisfied at that point.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        For $z = x in Bbb R$, $x ne 0$ is $f(z) = e^-1/x^4$ purely real,
        so that
        $$
        beginaligned
        u(x, 0) &= e^-1/x^4 \ v(x, 0) &= 0
        endaligned
        $$
        and therefore
        $$
        beginaligned
        u_x(0, 0) &= lim_x to 0 fracu(x, 0)-u(0, 0)x - 0
        = lim_x to 0 frace^-1/x^4x
        = lim_t to infty fracte^t^4 = 0 \
        v_x(0, 0) &= 0 , .
        endaligned
        $$
        In a similar way you can show that
        $$
        u_y(0, 0) = v_y(0, 0) = 0 , .
        $$
        All partial derivatives are zero at $z=0$, so that the Cauchy-Riemann
        equations are satisfied at that point.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Aug 15 at 5:43









        Martin R

        23.9k32743




        23.9k32743






















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


























             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2883176%2fis-there-an-easy-way-to-show-that-this-function-satisfies-cauchy-riemann-equatio%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            這個網誌中的熱門文章

            tkz-euclide: tkzDrawCircle[R] not working

            How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

            1st Magritte Awards