Nonstandard independent solutions of the Airy equation

Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am given a set of independent solutions of the Airy equation
$$ y''(z) - z~ y (z) = 0,$$
as contour integrals
$$ y_1,2(z) = int_C_1,2 e^ileft( t^3/3 + z tright) dt, $$
where $C_1$ is the path along the real axes starting from negative infinity to the positive, and $C_2$ starts from infinity from direction $5pi/6$ passes through the point (0,0) and ends in the infinity in direction $3pi/2$. Note that these contours are not in typical regions for Airy function.
How do I show that these are indeed the solutions of the Airy equation and that they are independent?
If I just plug them into the equation
$$ y_1,2''(z) - z~ y_1,2 (z) = -
int_C_1,2 left( t^2 + z right)e^ileft( t^3/3 + z tright) dt
= i
int_C_1,2 fracddt e^ileft( t^3/3 + z tright) dt, $$
and try using the fundamental theorem of calculus, it does not seem to help me much.
How do I proceed?
complex-analysis differential-equations complex-integration airy-functions
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am given a set of independent solutions of the Airy equation
$$ y''(z) - z~ y (z) = 0,$$
as contour integrals
$$ y_1,2(z) = int_C_1,2 e^ileft( t^3/3 + z tright) dt, $$
where $C_1$ is the path along the real axes starting from negative infinity to the positive, and $C_2$ starts from infinity from direction $5pi/6$ passes through the point (0,0) and ends in the infinity in direction $3pi/2$. Note that these contours are not in typical regions for Airy function.
How do I show that these are indeed the solutions of the Airy equation and that they are independent?
If I just plug them into the equation
$$ y_1,2''(z) - z~ y_1,2 (z) = -
int_C_1,2 left( t^2 + z right)e^ileft( t^3/3 + z tright) dt
= i
int_C_1,2 fracddt e^ileft( t^3/3 + z tright) dt, $$
and try using the fundamental theorem of calculus, it does not seem to help me much.
How do I proceed?
complex-analysis differential-equations complex-integration airy-functions
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am given a set of independent solutions of the Airy equation
$$ y''(z) - z~ y (z) = 0,$$
as contour integrals
$$ y_1,2(z) = int_C_1,2 e^ileft( t^3/3 + z tright) dt, $$
where $C_1$ is the path along the real axes starting from negative infinity to the positive, and $C_2$ starts from infinity from direction $5pi/6$ passes through the point (0,0) and ends in the infinity in direction $3pi/2$. Note that these contours are not in typical regions for Airy function.
How do I show that these are indeed the solutions of the Airy equation and that they are independent?
If I just plug them into the equation
$$ y_1,2''(z) - z~ y_1,2 (z) = -
int_C_1,2 left( t^2 + z right)e^ileft( t^3/3 + z tright) dt
= i
int_C_1,2 fracddt e^ileft( t^3/3 + z tright) dt, $$
and try using the fundamental theorem of calculus, it does not seem to help me much.
How do I proceed?
complex-analysis differential-equations complex-integration airy-functions
I am given a set of independent solutions of the Airy equation
$$ y''(z) - z~ y (z) = 0,$$
as contour integrals
$$ y_1,2(z) = int_C_1,2 e^ileft( t^3/3 + z tright) dt, $$
where $C_1$ is the path along the real axes starting from negative infinity to the positive, and $C_2$ starts from infinity from direction $5pi/6$ passes through the point (0,0) and ends in the infinity in direction $3pi/2$. Note that these contours are not in typical regions for Airy function.
How do I show that these are indeed the solutions of the Airy equation and that they are independent?
If I just plug them into the equation
$$ y_1,2''(z) - z~ y_1,2 (z) = -
int_C_1,2 left( t^2 + z right)e^ileft( t^3/3 + z tright) dt
= i
int_C_1,2 fracddt e^ileft( t^3/3 + z tright) dt, $$
and try using the fundamental theorem of calculus, it does not seem to help me much.
How do I proceed?
complex-analysis differential-equations complex-integration airy-functions
asked Aug 15 at 5:43
z.v.
179111
179111
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
$C_2$ is the easier of the two, and is where the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus comes in. Suppose $t = Re^5ipi/6$. What's $lim_Rrightarrowinftye^i(t^3/3+zt)$? What about when $t = Re^3ipi/2$?
For $C_1$, you should look at the wedge-shaped contours $se^5ipi/6 cup Re^ithetacup [-R, 0]$ and $[0, R]cup Re^itheta cup Rge sge 0$. The radial contours along $5pi/6$ and $pi/6$ can still be handled by FTC. For the circle contours, show that the integrand decays quickly with $R$, and thus the integral over the whole arc vanishes as $Rrightarrow infty$.
Right, the second one is easy, I did an algebra mistake when evaluating the endpoints. For $C_1$, ok, I see how $C^*$ should be zero given the closed contour and no poles inside, but I don't quite understand the semicircle part. I guess I should show that $y''-z y=0$ holds for the semicircle contour... but it does not look so...
â z.v.
Aug 15 at 8:39
@z.v. Ah, right...The contour has to be more complicated than that. I'll edit the post to reflect that.
â eyeballfrog
Aug 15 at 19:08
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
$C_2$ is the easier of the two, and is where the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus comes in. Suppose $t = Re^5ipi/6$. What's $lim_Rrightarrowinftye^i(t^3/3+zt)$? What about when $t = Re^3ipi/2$?
For $C_1$, you should look at the wedge-shaped contours $se^5ipi/6 cup Re^ithetacup [-R, 0]$ and $[0, R]cup Re^itheta cup Rge sge 0$. The radial contours along $5pi/6$ and $pi/6$ can still be handled by FTC. For the circle contours, show that the integrand decays quickly with $R$, and thus the integral over the whole arc vanishes as $Rrightarrow infty$.
Right, the second one is easy, I did an algebra mistake when evaluating the endpoints. For $C_1$, ok, I see how $C^*$ should be zero given the closed contour and no poles inside, but I don't quite understand the semicircle part. I guess I should show that $y''-z y=0$ holds for the semicircle contour... but it does not look so...
â z.v.
Aug 15 at 8:39
@z.v. Ah, right...The contour has to be more complicated than that. I'll edit the post to reflect that.
â eyeballfrog
Aug 15 at 19:08
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
$C_2$ is the easier of the two, and is where the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus comes in. Suppose $t = Re^5ipi/6$. What's $lim_Rrightarrowinftye^i(t^3/3+zt)$? What about when $t = Re^3ipi/2$?
For $C_1$, you should look at the wedge-shaped contours $se^5ipi/6 cup Re^ithetacup [-R, 0]$ and $[0, R]cup Re^itheta cup Rge sge 0$. The radial contours along $5pi/6$ and $pi/6$ can still be handled by FTC. For the circle contours, show that the integrand decays quickly with $R$, and thus the integral over the whole arc vanishes as $Rrightarrow infty$.
Right, the second one is easy, I did an algebra mistake when evaluating the endpoints. For $C_1$, ok, I see how $C^*$ should be zero given the closed contour and no poles inside, but I don't quite understand the semicircle part. I guess I should show that $y''-z y=0$ holds for the semicircle contour... but it does not look so...
â z.v.
Aug 15 at 8:39
@z.v. Ah, right...The contour has to be more complicated than that. I'll edit the post to reflect that.
â eyeballfrog
Aug 15 at 19:08
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
$C_2$ is the easier of the two, and is where the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus comes in. Suppose $t = Re^5ipi/6$. What's $lim_Rrightarrowinftye^i(t^3/3+zt)$? What about when $t = Re^3ipi/2$?
For $C_1$, you should look at the wedge-shaped contours $se^5ipi/6 cup Re^ithetacup [-R, 0]$ and $[0, R]cup Re^itheta cup Rge sge 0$. The radial contours along $5pi/6$ and $pi/6$ can still be handled by FTC. For the circle contours, show that the integrand decays quickly with $R$, and thus the integral over the whole arc vanishes as $Rrightarrow infty$.
$C_2$ is the easier of the two, and is where the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus comes in. Suppose $t = Re^5ipi/6$. What's $lim_Rrightarrowinftye^i(t^3/3+zt)$? What about when $t = Re^3ipi/2$?
For $C_1$, you should look at the wedge-shaped contours $se^5ipi/6 cup Re^ithetacup [-R, 0]$ and $[0, R]cup Re^itheta cup Rge sge 0$. The radial contours along $5pi/6$ and $pi/6$ can still be handled by FTC. For the circle contours, show that the integrand decays quickly with $R$, and thus the integral over the whole arc vanishes as $Rrightarrow infty$.
edited Aug 15 at 19:19
answered Aug 15 at 6:04
eyeballfrog
4,712527
4,712527
Right, the second one is easy, I did an algebra mistake when evaluating the endpoints. For $C_1$, ok, I see how $C^*$ should be zero given the closed contour and no poles inside, but I don't quite understand the semicircle part. I guess I should show that $y''-z y=0$ holds for the semicircle contour... but it does not look so...
â z.v.
Aug 15 at 8:39
@z.v. Ah, right...The contour has to be more complicated than that. I'll edit the post to reflect that.
â eyeballfrog
Aug 15 at 19:08
add a comment |Â
Right, the second one is easy, I did an algebra mistake when evaluating the endpoints. For $C_1$, ok, I see how $C^*$ should be zero given the closed contour and no poles inside, but I don't quite understand the semicircle part. I guess I should show that $y''-z y=0$ holds for the semicircle contour... but it does not look so...
â z.v.
Aug 15 at 8:39
@z.v. Ah, right...The contour has to be more complicated than that. I'll edit the post to reflect that.
â eyeballfrog
Aug 15 at 19:08
Right, the second one is easy, I did an algebra mistake when evaluating the endpoints. For $C_1$, ok, I see how $C^*$ should be zero given the closed contour and no poles inside, but I don't quite understand the semicircle part. I guess I should show that $y''-z y=0$ holds for the semicircle contour... but it does not look so...
â z.v.
Aug 15 at 8:39
Right, the second one is easy, I did an algebra mistake when evaluating the endpoints. For $C_1$, ok, I see how $C^*$ should be zero given the closed contour and no poles inside, but I don't quite understand the semicircle part. I guess I should show that $y''-z y=0$ holds for the semicircle contour... but it does not look so...
â z.v.
Aug 15 at 8:39
@z.v. Ah, right...The contour has to be more complicated than that. I'll edit the post to reflect that.
â eyeballfrog
Aug 15 at 19:08
@z.v. Ah, right...The contour has to be more complicated than that. I'll edit the post to reflect that.
â eyeballfrog
Aug 15 at 19:08
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2883237%2fnonstandard-independent-solutions-of-the-airy-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password