Show that the stochastic exponential is a true martingale

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
4
down vote

favorite
2












Let $W = W_t : tge0$ be a standard Brownian motion on a probability space $(Omega,mathcalF,mathbbP)$, and let $f$ be a deterministic function such that
$$
int_0^tf^2(s),ds<infty
$$
for all $tge 0$. Show that the stochastic exponential
$$
M_t = expleft(int_0^tf(s),dW_s - frac12int_0^tf^2(s),dsright)
$$
is a martingale.



I'm aware that this can be verified immediately using Novikov's criterion, for example, but I'm looking for a more direct proof than this. It's easy to demonstrate using Ito's lemma that
$$
M_t = 1 + int_0^tf(s)M_s,dW_s,
$$
and so the result can be boiled down to showing that
$$
mathbbEleft[int_0^tf^2(s)M_s^2,dsright]<infty.
$$
This seems promising, but I'm unsure how to proceed. I should mention that the subsequent part of the exercise I'm trying to solve asks to use the martingale property of $M_t$ to show that
$$
int_0^tf(s)dW_ssim Nleft(0,int_0^tf^2(s),dsright).
$$
This is straightforward to do, but it suggests that the martingale property can be demonstrated without appealing to these facts. Any suggestions or references would be greatly appreciated.







share|cite|improve this question






















  • I guess this should not make much sense since you need $mathbb EM_s^2ds<infty$ to prove your last line, which is just equivalently to $M$ being a martingale.
    – Cave Johnson
    Aug 25 at 1:04











  • Related: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1529726/….
    – Cave Johnson
    Aug 25 at 1:09






  • 1




    If @saz isn't sure then we probably don't have much hope.
    – Alex W
    Aug 25 at 15:30










  • For a deterministic $f$, $int_0^t f(s), dW_s$ is Gaussian with mean zero and variance $int_0^t f(s) ^2 ds$. Nothing else is needed.
    – zhoraster
    Aug 25 at 15:56






  • 1




    @AlexW you are doing me too much honour.
    – saz
    Aug 25 at 17:43














up vote
4
down vote

favorite
2












Let $W = W_t : tge0$ be a standard Brownian motion on a probability space $(Omega,mathcalF,mathbbP)$, and let $f$ be a deterministic function such that
$$
int_0^tf^2(s),ds<infty
$$
for all $tge 0$. Show that the stochastic exponential
$$
M_t = expleft(int_0^tf(s),dW_s - frac12int_0^tf^2(s),dsright)
$$
is a martingale.



I'm aware that this can be verified immediately using Novikov's criterion, for example, but I'm looking for a more direct proof than this. It's easy to demonstrate using Ito's lemma that
$$
M_t = 1 + int_0^tf(s)M_s,dW_s,
$$
and so the result can be boiled down to showing that
$$
mathbbEleft[int_0^tf^2(s)M_s^2,dsright]<infty.
$$
This seems promising, but I'm unsure how to proceed. I should mention that the subsequent part of the exercise I'm trying to solve asks to use the martingale property of $M_t$ to show that
$$
int_0^tf(s)dW_ssim Nleft(0,int_0^tf^2(s),dsright).
$$
This is straightforward to do, but it suggests that the martingale property can be demonstrated without appealing to these facts. Any suggestions or references would be greatly appreciated.







share|cite|improve this question






















  • I guess this should not make much sense since you need $mathbb EM_s^2ds<infty$ to prove your last line, which is just equivalently to $M$ being a martingale.
    – Cave Johnson
    Aug 25 at 1:04











  • Related: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1529726/….
    – Cave Johnson
    Aug 25 at 1:09






  • 1




    If @saz isn't sure then we probably don't have much hope.
    – Alex W
    Aug 25 at 15:30










  • For a deterministic $f$, $int_0^t f(s), dW_s$ is Gaussian with mean zero and variance $int_0^t f(s) ^2 ds$. Nothing else is needed.
    – zhoraster
    Aug 25 at 15:56






  • 1




    @AlexW you are doing me too much honour.
    – saz
    Aug 25 at 17:43












up vote
4
down vote

favorite
2









up vote
4
down vote

favorite
2






2





Let $W = W_t : tge0$ be a standard Brownian motion on a probability space $(Omega,mathcalF,mathbbP)$, and let $f$ be a deterministic function such that
$$
int_0^tf^2(s),ds<infty
$$
for all $tge 0$. Show that the stochastic exponential
$$
M_t = expleft(int_0^tf(s),dW_s - frac12int_0^tf^2(s),dsright)
$$
is a martingale.



I'm aware that this can be verified immediately using Novikov's criterion, for example, but I'm looking for a more direct proof than this. It's easy to demonstrate using Ito's lemma that
$$
M_t = 1 + int_0^tf(s)M_s,dW_s,
$$
and so the result can be boiled down to showing that
$$
mathbbEleft[int_0^tf^2(s)M_s^2,dsright]<infty.
$$
This seems promising, but I'm unsure how to proceed. I should mention that the subsequent part of the exercise I'm trying to solve asks to use the martingale property of $M_t$ to show that
$$
int_0^tf(s)dW_ssim Nleft(0,int_0^tf^2(s),dsright).
$$
This is straightforward to do, but it suggests that the martingale property can be demonstrated without appealing to these facts. Any suggestions or references would be greatly appreciated.







share|cite|improve this question














Let $W = W_t : tge0$ be a standard Brownian motion on a probability space $(Omega,mathcalF,mathbbP)$, and let $f$ be a deterministic function such that
$$
int_0^tf^2(s),ds<infty
$$
for all $tge 0$. Show that the stochastic exponential
$$
M_t = expleft(int_0^tf(s),dW_s - frac12int_0^tf^2(s),dsright)
$$
is a martingale.



I'm aware that this can be verified immediately using Novikov's criterion, for example, but I'm looking for a more direct proof than this. It's easy to demonstrate using Ito's lemma that
$$
M_t = 1 + int_0^tf(s)M_s,dW_s,
$$
and so the result can be boiled down to showing that
$$
mathbbEleft[int_0^tf^2(s)M_s^2,dsright]<infty.
$$
This seems promising, but I'm unsure how to proceed. I should mention that the subsequent part of the exercise I'm trying to solve asks to use the martingale property of $M_t$ to show that
$$
int_0^tf(s)dW_ssim Nleft(0,int_0^tf^2(s),dsright).
$$
This is straightforward to do, but it suggests that the martingale property can be demonstrated without appealing to these facts. Any suggestions or references would be greatly appreciated.









share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 26 at 6:08









saz

73.4k553113




73.4k553113










asked Aug 25 at 0:25









Alex W

1327




1327











  • I guess this should not make much sense since you need $mathbb EM_s^2ds<infty$ to prove your last line, which is just equivalently to $M$ being a martingale.
    – Cave Johnson
    Aug 25 at 1:04











  • Related: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1529726/….
    – Cave Johnson
    Aug 25 at 1:09






  • 1




    If @saz isn't sure then we probably don't have much hope.
    – Alex W
    Aug 25 at 15:30










  • For a deterministic $f$, $int_0^t f(s), dW_s$ is Gaussian with mean zero and variance $int_0^t f(s) ^2 ds$. Nothing else is needed.
    – zhoraster
    Aug 25 at 15:56






  • 1




    @AlexW you are doing me too much honour.
    – saz
    Aug 25 at 17:43
















  • I guess this should not make much sense since you need $mathbb EM_s^2ds<infty$ to prove your last line, which is just equivalently to $M$ being a martingale.
    – Cave Johnson
    Aug 25 at 1:04











  • Related: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1529726/….
    – Cave Johnson
    Aug 25 at 1:09






  • 1




    If @saz isn't sure then we probably don't have much hope.
    – Alex W
    Aug 25 at 15:30










  • For a deterministic $f$, $int_0^t f(s), dW_s$ is Gaussian with mean zero and variance $int_0^t f(s) ^2 ds$. Nothing else is needed.
    – zhoraster
    Aug 25 at 15:56






  • 1




    @AlexW you are doing me too much honour.
    – saz
    Aug 25 at 17:43















I guess this should not make much sense since you need $mathbb EM_s^2ds<infty$ to prove your last line, which is just equivalently to $M$ being a martingale.
– Cave Johnson
Aug 25 at 1:04





I guess this should not make much sense since you need $mathbb EM_s^2ds<infty$ to prove your last line, which is just equivalently to $M$ being a martingale.
– Cave Johnson
Aug 25 at 1:04













Related: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1529726/….
– Cave Johnson
Aug 25 at 1:09




Related: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1529726/….
– Cave Johnson
Aug 25 at 1:09




1




1




If @saz isn't sure then we probably don't have much hope.
– Alex W
Aug 25 at 15:30




If @saz isn't sure then we probably don't have much hope.
– Alex W
Aug 25 at 15:30












For a deterministic $f$, $int_0^t f(s), dW_s$ is Gaussian with mean zero and variance $int_0^t f(s) ^2 ds$. Nothing else is needed.
– zhoraster
Aug 25 at 15:56




For a deterministic $f$, $int_0^t f(s), dW_s$ is Gaussian with mean zero and variance $int_0^t f(s) ^2 ds$. Nothing else is needed.
– zhoraster
Aug 25 at 15:56




1




1




@AlexW you are doing me too much honour.
– saz
Aug 25 at 17:43




@AlexW you are doing me too much honour.
– saz
Aug 25 at 17:43










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote



accepted










Itô's formula shows that



$$M_t = 1+ int_0^t f(s) M_s , dW_s tag1$$



and this implies, in particular, that $(M_t)_t geq 0$ is a local martingale. (Note that $(M_t)_t geq 0$ has continuous sample paths, and therefore the stochastic integral on the right-hand side is well-defined.) On the other hand, it follows from the very definition that $M_t geq 0$ for each $t geq 0$. Since any non-negative local martingale is a supermartingale (see e.g. this question for details), we conclude that $(M_t)_t geq 0$ is a supermartingale. Thus,



$$mathbbE(M_t) leq mathbbE(M_0) leq 1$$



which implies



$$mathbbE exp left( int_0^t f(s) , dW_s right) leq exp left( frac12 int_0^t f(s)^2 , ds right)$$



for each $t geq 0$. Replacing $f$ by $2f$ we find in particular that



$$mathbbE left| exp left( int_0^t f(s) , dW_s right) right|^2 = mathbbEexp left( int_0^t 2f(s) , dW_s right) leq exp left( int_0^t f(s)^2 , ds right) < infty,$$



and so



$$mathbbE(M_t^2) leq exp left( int_0^t f(s)^2 , ds right).$$



Using this estimate and the fact that $f$ is deterministic, we can easily check that the stochastic integral $int_0^t f(s) M(s) , dW_s$ is a true martingale, and now $(1)$ shows that $(M_t)_t geq 0$ is a martingale.






share|cite|improve this answer






















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2893696%2fshow-that-the-stochastic-exponential-is-a-true-martingale%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    3
    down vote



    accepted










    Itô's formula shows that



    $$M_t = 1+ int_0^t f(s) M_s , dW_s tag1$$



    and this implies, in particular, that $(M_t)_t geq 0$ is a local martingale. (Note that $(M_t)_t geq 0$ has continuous sample paths, and therefore the stochastic integral on the right-hand side is well-defined.) On the other hand, it follows from the very definition that $M_t geq 0$ for each $t geq 0$. Since any non-negative local martingale is a supermartingale (see e.g. this question for details), we conclude that $(M_t)_t geq 0$ is a supermartingale. Thus,



    $$mathbbE(M_t) leq mathbbE(M_0) leq 1$$



    which implies



    $$mathbbE exp left( int_0^t f(s) , dW_s right) leq exp left( frac12 int_0^t f(s)^2 , ds right)$$



    for each $t geq 0$. Replacing $f$ by $2f$ we find in particular that



    $$mathbbE left| exp left( int_0^t f(s) , dW_s right) right|^2 = mathbbEexp left( int_0^t 2f(s) , dW_s right) leq exp left( int_0^t f(s)^2 , ds right) < infty,$$



    and so



    $$mathbbE(M_t^2) leq exp left( int_0^t f(s)^2 , ds right).$$



    Using this estimate and the fact that $f$ is deterministic, we can easily check that the stochastic integral $int_0^t f(s) M(s) , dW_s$ is a true martingale, and now $(1)$ shows that $(M_t)_t geq 0$ is a martingale.






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      up vote
      3
      down vote



      accepted










      Itô's formula shows that



      $$M_t = 1+ int_0^t f(s) M_s , dW_s tag1$$



      and this implies, in particular, that $(M_t)_t geq 0$ is a local martingale. (Note that $(M_t)_t geq 0$ has continuous sample paths, and therefore the stochastic integral on the right-hand side is well-defined.) On the other hand, it follows from the very definition that $M_t geq 0$ for each $t geq 0$. Since any non-negative local martingale is a supermartingale (see e.g. this question for details), we conclude that $(M_t)_t geq 0$ is a supermartingale. Thus,



      $$mathbbE(M_t) leq mathbbE(M_0) leq 1$$



      which implies



      $$mathbbE exp left( int_0^t f(s) , dW_s right) leq exp left( frac12 int_0^t f(s)^2 , ds right)$$



      for each $t geq 0$. Replacing $f$ by $2f$ we find in particular that



      $$mathbbE left| exp left( int_0^t f(s) , dW_s right) right|^2 = mathbbEexp left( int_0^t 2f(s) , dW_s right) leq exp left( int_0^t f(s)^2 , ds right) < infty,$$



      and so



      $$mathbbE(M_t^2) leq exp left( int_0^t f(s)^2 , ds right).$$



      Using this estimate and the fact that $f$ is deterministic, we can easily check that the stochastic integral $int_0^t f(s) M(s) , dW_s$ is a true martingale, and now $(1)$ shows that $(M_t)_t geq 0$ is a martingale.






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        up vote
        3
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        3
        down vote



        accepted






        Itô's formula shows that



        $$M_t = 1+ int_0^t f(s) M_s , dW_s tag1$$



        and this implies, in particular, that $(M_t)_t geq 0$ is a local martingale. (Note that $(M_t)_t geq 0$ has continuous sample paths, and therefore the stochastic integral on the right-hand side is well-defined.) On the other hand, it follows from the very definition that $M_t geq 0$ for each $t geq 0$. Since any non-negative local martingale is a supermartingale (see e.g. this question for details), we conclude that $(M_t)_t geq 0$ is a supermartingale. Thus,



        $$mathbbE(M_t) leq mathbbE(M_0) leq 1$$



        which implies



        $$mathbbE exp left( int_0^t f(s) , dW_s right) leq exp left( frac12 int_0^t f(s)^2 , ds right)$$



        for each $t geq 0$. Replacing $f$ by $2f$ we find in particular that



        $$mathbbE left| exp left( int_0^t f(s) , dW_s right) right|^2 = mathbbEexp left( int_0^t 2f(s) , dW_s right) leq exp left( int_0^t f(s)^2 , ds right) < infty,$$



        and so



        $$mathbbE(M_t^2) leq exp left( int_0^t f(s)^2 , ds right).$$



        Using this estimate and the fact that $f$ is deterministic, we can easily check that the stochastic integral $int_0^t f(s) M(s) , dW_s$ is a true martingale, and now $(1)$ shows that $(M_t)_t geq 0$ is a martingale.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        Itô's formula shows that



        $$M_t = 1+ int_0^t f(s) M_s , dW_s tag1$$



        and this implies, in particular, that $(M_t)_t geq 0$ is a local martingale. (Note that $(M_t)_t geq 0$ has continuous sample paths, and therefore the stochastic integral on the right-hand side is well-defined.) On the other hand, it follows from the very definition that $M_t geq 0$ for each $t geq 0$. Since any non-negative local martingale is a supermartingale (see e.g. this question for details), we conclude that $(M_t)_t geq 0$ is a supermartingale. Thus,



        $$mathbbE(M_t) leq mathbbE(M_0) leq 1$$



        which implies



        $$mathbbE exp left( int_0^t f(s) , dW_s right) leq exp left( frac12 int_0^t f(s)^2 , ds right)$$



        for each $t geq 0$. Replacing $f$ by $2f$ we find in particular that



        $$mathbbE left| exp left( int_0^t f(s) , dW_s right) right|^2 = mathbbEexp left( int_0^t 2f(s) , dW_s right) leq exp left( int_0^t f(s)^2 , ds right) < infty,$$



        and so



        $$mathbbE(M_t^2) leq exp left( int_0^t f(s)^2 , ds right).$$



        Using this estimate and the fact that $f$ is deterministic, we can easily check that the stochastic integral $int_0^t f(s) M(s) , dW_s$ is a true martingale, and now $(1)$ shows that $(M_t)_t geq 0$ is a martingale.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Aug 30 at 7:35









        TheBridge

        3,64111324




        3,64111324










        answered Aug 25 at 18:29









        saz

        73.4k553113




        73.4k553113



























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2893696%2fshow-that-the-stochastic-exponential-is-a-true-martingale%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            這個網誌中的熱門文章

            tkz-euclide: tkzDrawCircle[R] not working

            How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

            1st Magritte Awards