Additive functor on a long exact sequence
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
If $$0to X_0to X_1to X_2to X_3to dotsb$$ is exact. Why does an additive, left-exact covariant functor $G$ gives us an exact sequence:
$$0to G(X_0)to G(X_1)to G(X_2)$$
I know that by left-exactness is preserves monomorphisms so that
$$0to G(X_0)to G(X_1)$$
should be exact, but why exactness around $G(X_1)$?
Should I just think about changing the map out of $X_2$ to $X_2to 0$?
homology-cohomology homological-algebra
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
If $$0to X_0to X_1to X_2to X_3to dotsb$$ is exact. Why does an additive, left-exact covariant functor $G$ gives us an exact sequence:
$$0to G(X_0)to G(X_1)to G(X_2)$$
I know that by left-exactness is preserves monomorphisms so that
$$0to G(X_0)to G(X_1)$$
should be exact, but why exactness around $G(X_1)$?
Should I just think about changing the map out of $X_2$ to $X_2to 0$?
homology-cohomology homological-algebra
It the âÂÂadditive covariant functor $G$â suppose do be left-exact?
â Jendrik Stelzner
Aug 25 at 9:57
@JendrikStelzner yeah my definition I read has that
â user587047
Aug 25 at 10:09
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
If $$0to X_0to X_1to X_2to X_3to dotsb$$ is exact. Why does an additive, left-exact covariant functor $G$ gives us an exact sequence:
$$0to G(X_0)to G(X_1)to G(X_2)$$
I know that by left-exactness is preserves monomorphisms so that
$$0to G(X_0)to G(X_1)$$
should be exact, but why exactness around $G(X_1)$?
Should I just think about changing the map out of $X_2$ to $X_2to 0$?
homology-cohomology homological-algebra
If $$0to X_0to X_1to X_2to X_3to dotsb$$ is exact. Why does an additive, left-exact covariant functor $G$ gives us an exact sequence:
$$0to G(X_0)to G(X_1)to G(X_2)$$
I know that by left-exactness is preserves monomorphisms so that
$$0to G(X_0)to G(X_1)$$
should be exact, but why exactness around $G(X_1)$?
Should I just think about changing the map out of $X_2$ to $X_2to 0$?
homology-cohomology homological-algebra
edited Aug 25 at 10:16
Jendrik Stelzner
7,57221037
7,57221037
asked Aug 25 at 9:43
user587047
112
112
It the âÂÂadditive covariant functor $G$â suppose do be left-exact?
â Jendrik Stelzner
Aug 25 at 9:57
@JendrikStelzner yeah my definition I read has that
â user587047
Aug 25 at 10:09
add a comment |Â
It the âÂÂadditive covariant functor $G$â suppose do be left-exact?
â Jendrik Stelzner
Aug 25 at 9:57
@JendrikStelzner yeah my definition I read has that
â user587047
Aug 25 at 10:09
It the âÂÂadditive covariant functor $G$â suppose do be left-exact?
â Jendrik Stelzner
Aug 25 at 9:57
It the âÂÂadditive covariant functor $G$â suppose do be left-exact?
â Jendrik Stelzner
Aug 25 at 9:57
@JendrikStelzner yeah my definition I read has that
â user587047
Aug 25 at 10:09
@JendrikStelzner yeah my definition I read has that
â user587047
Aug 25 at 10:09
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
For an additive functor $G colon mathcalA to mathcalB$ the following two definitions of left-exactness are equivalent:
For every short exact sequence $0 to A'' to A to A' to 0$ in $mathcalA$, the induced sequence
$$
0 to G(A'') to G(A) to G(A')
$$
in $mathcalB$ is again exact.For every exact sequence $0 to A'' to A to A'$ in $mathcalA$, the induced sequence
$$
0 to G(A'') to G(A) to G(A')
$$
in $mathcalB$ is again exact.
A proof of the equivalence of the two definitions (namely the implication $1 implies 2$) can be found here.
Note that left-exactness is (in general) much stronger than just preserving monomorphisms (see here for an example of an additive functor which preserves monomorphisms but is not left-exact).
We can solve the problem by applying the second characterization of left-exactness:
It follows from the exactness of
$$
0 to X_0 to X_1 to X_2 to X_3 to dotsb
$$
that the truncated sequence
$$
0 to X_0 to X_1 to X_2
$$
is exact, from which it then follows by the left-exactness of $G$ that the sequence
$$
0 to G(X_0) to G(X_1) to G(X_2)
$$
is exact.
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
For an additive functor $G colon mathcalA to mathcalB$ the following two definitions of left-exactness are equivalent:
For every short exact sequence $0 to A'' to A to A' to 0$ in $mathcalA$, the induced sequence
$$
0 to G(A'') to G(A) to G(A')
$$
in $mathcalB$ is again exact.For every exact sequence $0 to A'' to A to A'$ in $mathcalA$, the induced sequence
$$
0 to G(A'') to G(A) to G(A')
$$
in $mathcalB$ is again exact.
A proof of the equivalence of the two definitions (namely the implication $1 implies 2$) can be found here.
Note that left-exactness is (in general) much stronger than just preserving monomorphisms (see here for an example of an additive functor which preserves monomorphisms but is not left-exact).
We can solve the problem by applying the second characterization of left-exactness:
It follows from the exactness of
$$
0 to X_0 to X_1 to X_2 to X_3 to dotsb
$$
that the truncated sequence
$$
0 to X_0 to X_1 to X_2
$$
is exact, from which it then follows by the left-exactness of $G$ that the sequence
$$
0 to G(X_0) to G(X_1) to G(X_2)
$$
is exact.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
For an additive functor $G colon mathcalA to mathcalB$ the following two definitions of left-exactness are equivalent:
For every short exact sequence $0 to A'' to A to A' to 0$ in $mathcalA$, the induced sequence
$$
0 to G(A'') to G(A) to G(A')
$$
in $mathcalB$ is again exact.For every exact sequence $0 to A'' to A to A'$ in $mathcalA$, the induced sequence
$$
0 to G(A'') to G(A) to G(A')
$$
in $mathcalB$ is again exact.
A proof of the equivalence of the two definitions (namely the implication $1 implies 2$) can be found here.
Note that left-exactness is (in general) much stronger than just preserving monomorphisms (see here for an example of an additive functor which preserves monomorphisms but is not left-exact).
We can solve the problem by applying the second characterization of left-exactness:
It follows from the exactness of
$$
0 to X_0 to X_1 to X_2 to X_3 to dotsb
$$
that the truncated sequence
$$
0 to X_0 to X_1 to X_2
$$
is exact, from which it then follows by the left-exactness of $G$ that the sequence
$$
0 to G(X_0) to G(X_1) to G(X_2)
$$
is exact.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
For an additive functor $G colon mathcalA to mathcalB$ the following two definitions of left-exactness are equivalent:
For every short exact sequence $0 to A'' to A to A' to 0$ in $mathcalA$, the induced sequence
$$
0 to G(A'') to G(A) to G(A')
$$
in $mathcalB$ is again exact.For every exact sequence $0 to A'' to A to A'$ in $mathcalA$, the induced sequence
$$
0 to G(A'') to G(A) to G(A')
$$
in $mathcalB$ is again exact.
A proof of the equivalence of the two definitions (namely the implication $1 implies 2$) can be found here.
Note that left-exactness is (in general) much stronger than just preserving monomorphisms (see here for an example of an additive functor which preserves monomorphisms but is not left-exact).
We can solve the problem by applying the second characterization of left-exactness:
It follows from the exactness of
$$
0 to X_0 to X_1 to X_2 to X_3 to dotsb
$$
that the truncated sequence
$$
0 to X_0 to X_1 to X_2
$$
is exact, from which it then follows by the left-exactness of $G$ that the sequence
$$
0 to G(X_0) to G(X_1) to G(X_2)
$$
is exact.
For an additive functor $G colon mathcalA to mathcalB$ the following two definitions of left-exactness are equivalent:
For every short exact sequence $0 to A'' to A to A' to 0$ in $mathcalA$, the induced sequence
$$
0 to G(A'') to G(A) to G(A')
$$
in $mathcalB$ is again exact.For every exact sequence $0 to A'' to A to A'$ in $mathcalA$, the induced sequence
$$
0 to G(A'') to G(A) to G(A')
$$
in $mathcalB$ is again exact.
A proof of the equivalence of the two definitions (namely the implication $1 implies 2$) can be found here.
Note that left-exactness is (in general) much stronger than just preserving monomorphisms (see here for an example of an additive functor which preserves monomorphisms but is not left-exact).
We can solve the problem by applying the second characterization of left-exactness:
It follows from the exactness of
$$
0 to X_0 to X_1 to X_2 to X_3 to dotsb
$$
that the truncated sequence
$$
0 to X_0 to X_1 to X_2
$$
is exact, from which it then follows by the left-exactness of $G$ that the sequence
$$
0 to G(X_0) to G(X_1) to G(X_2)
$$
is exact.
answered Aug 25 at 10:15
Jendrik Stelzner
7,57221037
7,57221037
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2893953%2fadditive-functor-on-a-long-exact-sequence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
It the âÂÂadditive covariant functor $G$â suppose do be left-exact?
â Jendrik Stelzner
Aug 25 at 9:57
@JendrikStelzner yeah my definition I read has that
â user587047
Aug 25 at 10:09