Laws of Algebra of Propositions Question (attempted, assistance required)
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I'm trying to work out a class exercise and I've got myself stuck. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.
I am to use use algebra of propositions to solve the following problem:
Show the below is true by the algebra of propositions:
(ìp ⨠q) ⧠(p ⨠ìq) â¡ (p ⨠q) â (p ⧠q)
Here's what I have done so far:
Conditional and Biconditional: (ìp ⨠q) ⧠(p ⨠ìq) â¡ (p â q) ⧠(q â p)
Current Conversion (No proof it is true yet): (p â q) ⧠(q â p) â¡ (p ⨠q) â (p ⧠q)
Conditional and Biconditional: (p â q) ⧠(q â p) â¡ p â q
Current Conversion (No proof it is true yet): p â q â¡ (p ⨠q) â (p ⧠q)
I have ran them through an online calculator for this type of thing and they are true but I cannot figure out the steps using the different Laws of Algebra of Propositions. If anyone could explain anything, I would be very grateful.
algebra-precalculus propositional-calculus
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I'm trying to work out a class exercise and I've got myself stuck. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.
I am to use use algebra of propositions to solve the following problem:
Show the below is true by the algebra of propositions:
(ìp ⨠q) ⧠(p ⨠ìq) â¡ (p ⨠q) â (p ⧠q)
Here's what I have done so far:
Conditional and Biconditional: (ìp ⨠q) ⧠(p ⨠ìq) â¡ (p â q) ⧠(q â p)
Current Conversion (No proof it is true yet): (p â q) ⧠(q â p) â¡ (p ⨠q) â (p ⧠q)
Conditional and Biconditional: (p â q) ⧠(q â p) â¡ p â q
Current Conversion (No proof it is true yet): p â q â¡ (p ⨠q) â (p ⧠q)
I have ran them through an online calculator for this type of thing and they are true but I cannot figure out the steps using the different Laws of Algebra of Propositions. If anyone could explain anything, I would be very grateful.
algebra-precalculus propositional-calculus
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I'm trying to work out a class exercise and I've got myself stuck. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.
I am to use use algebra of propositions to solve the following problem:
Show the below is true by the algebra of propositions:
(ìp ⨠q) ⧠(p ⨠ìq) â¡ (p ⨠q) â (p ⧠q)
Here's what I have done so far:
Conditional and Biconditional: (ìp ⨠q) ⧠(p ⨠ìq) â¡ (p â q) ⧠(q â p)
Current Conversion (No proof it is true yet): (p â q) ⧠(q â p) â¡ (p ⨠q) â (p ⧠q)
Conditional and Biconditional: (p â q) ⧠(q â p) â¡ p â q
Current Conversion (No proof it is true yet): p â q â¡ (p ⨠q) â (p ⧠q)
I have ran them through an online calculator for this type of thing and they are true but I cannot figure out the steps using the different Laws of Algebra of Propositions. If anyone could explain anything, I would be very grateful.
algebra-precalculus propositional-calculus
I'm trying to work out a class exercise and I've got myself stuck. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.
I am to use use algebra of propositions to solve the following problem:
Show the below is true by the algebra of propositions:
(ìp ⨠q) ⧠(p ⨠ìq) â¡ (p ⨠q) â (p ⧠q)
Here's what I have done so far:
Conditional and Biconditional: (ìp ⨠q) ⧠(p ⨠ìq) â¡ (p â q) ⧠(q â p)
Current Conversion (No proof it is true yet): (p â q) ⧠(q â p) â¡ (p ⨠q) â (p ⧠q)
Conditional and Biconditional: (p â q) ⧠(q â p) â¡ p â q
Current Conversion (No proof it is true yet): p â q â¡ (p ⨠q) â (p ⧠q)
I have ran them through an online calculator for this type of thing and they are true but I cannot figure out the steps using the different Laws of Algebra of Propositions. If anyone could explain anything, I would be very grateful.
algebra-precalculus propositional-calculus
asked Jun 18 '17 at 10:46
Mcclaine
133
133
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
If you can use the following two equivalences:
$$p leftrightarrow q equiv (p rightarrow q) land (q rightarrow p)$$
$$p leftrightarrow q equiv (p land q) lor (neg p lor neg p)$$
Then you are indeed well on your way:
$$(neg p lor q) land (p lor neg q) text (Commutation)$$
$$(neg p lor q) land (neg q lor p) text (Implication)$$
$$(p rightarrow q) land (q rightarrow p) text (Equivalence)$$
$$p leftrightarrow q equiv text (Equivalence)$$
$$(p land q) lor (neg p land neg q) text (DeMorgan)$$
$$(p land q) lor neg (p lor q) text (Commutation)$$
$$neg (p land q) lor (p land q) text (Implication)$$
$$(p land q) to (p land q)$$
However, if you don't have both of those equivalences regarding the biconditional, then you'll have to do it the hard way, and starting at the left will actually be a little easier to follow:
$$(p lor q) to (p land q) text (Implication)$$
$$neg (p lor q) lor (p land q) equiv text (DeMorgan)$$
$$(neg p land neg q) lor (p land q) equiv text (Distribution)$$
$$((neg p land neg q) lor p) land ((neg p land neg q)lor q) equiv text (Distribution x 2)$$
$$((neg p lor p) land (neg q lor p)) land ((neg p lor q) land (neg q lor q)) equiv text (Commutation x 3)$$
$$((p lor neg p) land (p lor neg q)) land ((neg p lor q) land (q lor neg q)) equiv text (Complement x 2)$$
$$(top land (p lor neg q)) land ((neg p lor q) land top) equiv text (Identity x 2)$$
$$(p lor neg q) land (neg p lor q) equiv text (Commutation)$$
$$(neg p lor q) land (p lor neg q)$$
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
If you can use the following two equivalences:
$$p leftrightarrow q equiv (p rightarrow q) land (q rightarrow p)$$
$$p leftrightarrow q equiv (p land q) lor (neg p lor neg p)$$
Then you are indeed well on your way:
$$(neg p lor q) land (p lor neg q) text (Commutation)$$
$$(neg p lor q) land (neg q lor p) text (Implication)$$
$$(p rightarrow q) land (q rightarrow p) text (Equivalence)$$
$$p leftrightarrow q equiv text (Equivalence)$$
$$(p land q) lor (neg p land neg q) text (DeMorgan)$$
$$(p land q) lor neg (p lor q) text (Commutation)$$
$$neg (p land q) lor (p land q) text (Implication)$$
$$(p land q) to (p land q)$$
However, if you don't have both of those equivalences regarding the biconditional, then you'll have to do it the hard way, and starting at the left will actually be a little easier to follow:
$$(p lor q) to (p land q) text (Implication)$$
$$neg (p lor q) lor (p land q) equiv text (DeMorgan)$$
$$(neg p land neg q) lor (p land q) equiv text (Distribution)$$
$$((neg p land neg q) lor p) land ((neg p land neg q)lor q) equiv text (Distribution x 2)$$
$$((neg p lor p) land (neg q lor p)) land ((neg p lor q) land (neg q lor q)) equiv text (Commutation x 3)$$
$$((p lor neg p) land (p lor neg q)) land ((neg p lor q) land (q lor neg q)) equiv text (Complement x 2)$$
$$(top land (p lor neg q)) land ((neg p lor q) land top) equiv text (Identity x 2)$$
$$(p lor neg q) land (neg p lor q) equiv text (Commutation)$$
$$(neg p lor q) land (p lor neg q)$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
If you can use the following two equivalences:
$$p leftrightarrow q equiv (p rightarrow q) land (q rightarrow p)$$
$$p leftrightarrow q equiv (p land q) lor (neg p lor neg p)$$
Then you are indeed well on your way:
$$(neg p lor q) land (p lor neg q) text (Commutation)$$
$$(neg p lor q) land (neg q lor p) text (Implication)$$
$$(p rightarrow q) land (q rightarrow p) text (Equivalence)$$
$$p leftrightarrow q equiv text (Equivalence)$$
$$(p land q) lor (neg p land neg q) text (DeMorgan)$$
$$(p land q) lor neg (p lor q) text (Commutation)$$
$$neg (p land q) lor (p land q) text (Implication)$$
$$(p land q) to (p land q)$$
However, if you don't have both of those equivalences regarding the biconditional, then you'll have to do it the hard way, and starting at the left will actually be a little easier to follow:
$$(p lor q) to (p land q) text (Implication)$$
$$neg (p lor q) lor (p land q) equiv text (DeMorgan)$$
$$(neg p land neg q) lor (p land q) equiv text (Distribution)$$
$$((neg p land neg q) lor p) land ((neg p land neg q)lor q) equiv text (Distribution x 2)$$
$$((neg p lor p) land (neg q lor p)) land ((neg p lor q) land (neg q lor q)) equiv text (Commutation x 3)$$
$$((p lor neg p) land (p lor neg q)) land ((neg p lor q) land (q lor neg q)) equiv text (Complement x 2)$$
$$(top land (p lor neg q)) land ((neg p lor q) land top) equiv text (Identity x 2)$$
$$(p lor neg q) land (neg p lor q) equiv text (Commutation)$$
$$(neg p lor q) land (p lor neg q)$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
If you can use the following two equivalences:
$$p leftrightarrow q equiv (p rightarrow q) land (q rightarrow p)$$
$$p leftrightarrow q equiv (p land q) lor (neg p lor neg p)$$
Then you are indeed well on your way:
$$(neg p lor q) land (p lor neg q) text (Commutation)$$
$$(neg p lor q) land (neg q lor p) text (Implication)$$
$$(p rightarrow q) land (q rightarrow p) text (Equivalence)$$
$$p leftrightarrow q equiv text (Equivalence)$$
$$(p land q) lor (neg p land neg q) text (DeMorgan)$$
$$(p land q) lor neg (p lor q) text (Commutation)$$
$$neg (p land q) lor (p land q) text (Implication)$$
$$(p land q) to (p land q)$$
However, if you don't have both of those equivalences regarding the biconditional, then you'll have to do it the hard way, and starting at the left will actually be a little easier to follow:
$$(p lor q) to (p land q) text (Implication)$$
$$neg (p lor q) lor (p land q) equiv text (DeMorgan)$$
$$(neg p land neg q) lor (p land q) equiv text (Distribution)$$
$$((neg p land neg q) lor p) land ((neg p land neg q)lor q) equiv text (Distribution x 2)$$
$$((neg p lor p) land (neg q lor p)) land ((neg p lor q) land (neg q lor q)) equiv text (Commutation x 3)$$
$$((p lor neg p) land (p lor neg q)) land ((neg p lor q) land (q lor neg q)) equiv text (Complement x 2)$$
$$(top land (p lor neg q)) land ((neg p lor q) land top) equiv text (Identity x 2)$$
$$(p lor neg q) land (neg p lor q) equiv text (Commutation)$$
$$(neg p lor q) land (p lor neg q)$$
If you can use the following two equivalences:
$$p leftrightarrow q equiv (p rightarrow q) land (q rightarrow p)$$
$$p leftrightarrow q equiv (p land q) lor (neg p lor neg p)$$
Then you are indeed well on your way:
$$(neg p lor q) land (p lor neg q) text (Commutation)$$
$$(neg p lor q) land (neg q lor p) text (Implication)$$
$$(p rightarrow q) land (q rightarrow p) text (Equivalence)$$
$$p leftrightarrow q equiv text (Equivalence)$$
$$(p land q) lor (neg p land neg q) text (DeMorgan)$$
$$(p land q) lor neg (p lor q) text (Commutation)$$
$$neg (p land q) lor (p land q) text (Implication)$$
$$(p land q) to (p land q)$$
However, if you don't have both of those equivalences regarding the biconditional, then you'll have to do it the hard way, and starting at the left will actually be a little easier to follow:
$$(p lor q) to (p land q) text (Implication)$$
$$neg (p lor q) lor (p land q) equiv text (DeMorgan)$$
$$(neg p land neg q) lor (p land q) equiv text (Distribution)$$
$$((neg p land neg q) lor p) land ((neg p land neg q)lor q) equiv text (Distribution x 2)$$
$$((neg p lor p) land (neg q lor p)) land ((neg p lor q) land (neg q lor q)) equiv text (Commutation x 3)$$
$$((p lor neg p) land (p lor neg q)) land ((neg p lor q) land (q lor neg q)) equiv text (Complement x 2)$$
$$(top land (p lor neg q)) land ((neg p lor q) land top) equiv text (Identity x 2)$$
$$(p lor neg q) land (neg p lor q) equiv text (Commutation)$$
$$(neg p lor q) land (p lor neg q)$$
edited Jun 18 '17 at 12:58
answered Jun 18 '17 at 11:04
Bram28
55.5k33982
55.5k33982
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2327151%2flaws-of-algebra-of-propositions-question-attempted-assistance-required%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password