Laws of Algebra of Propositions Question (attempted, assistance required)

Multi tool use
Multi tool use

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I'm trying to work out a class exercise and I've got myself stuck. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.



I am to use use algebra of propositions to solve the following problem:



Show the below is true by the algebra of propositions:



(¬p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ ¬q) ≡ (p ∨ q) → (p ∧ q)



Here's what I have done so far:



Conditional and Biconditional: (¬p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ ¬q) ≡ (p → q) ∧ (q → p)



Current Conversion (No proof it is true yet): (p → q) ∧ (q → p) ≡ (p ∨ q) → (p ∧ q)



Conditional and Biconditional: (p → q) ∧ (q → p) ≡ p ↔ q



Current Conversion (No proof it is true yet): p ↔ q ≡ (p ∨ q) → (p ∧ q)



I have ran them through an online calculator for this type of thing and they are true but I cannot figure out the steps using the different Laws of Algebra of Propositions. If anyone could explain anything, I would be very grateful.







share|cite|improve this question
























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    I'm trying to work out a class exercise and I've got myself stuck. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.



    I am to use use algebra of propositions to solve the following problem:



    Show the below is true by the algebra of propositions:



    (¬p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ ¬q) ≡ (p ∨ q) → (p ∧ q)



    Here's what I have done so far:



    Conditional and Biconditional: (¬p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ ¬q) ≡ (p → q) ∧ (q → p)



    Current Conversion (No proof it is true yet): (p → q) ∧ (q → p) ≡ (p ∨ q) → (p ∧ q)



    Conditional and Biconditional: (p → q) ∧ (q → p) ≡ p ↔ q



    Current Conversion (No proof it is true yet): p ↔ q ≡ (p ∨ q) → (p ∧ q)



    I have ran them through an online calculator for this type of thing and they are true but I cannot figure out the steps using the different Laws of Algebra of Propositions. If anyone could explain anything, I would be very grateful.







    share|cite|improve this question






















      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      I'm trying to work out a class exercise and I've got myself stuck. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.



      I am to use use algebra of propositions to solve the following problem:



      Show the below is true by the algebra of propositions:



      (¬p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ ¬q) ≡ (p ∨ q) → (p ∧ q)



      Here's what I have done so far:



      Conditional and Biconditional: (¬p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ ¬q) ≡ (p → q) ∧ (q → p)



      Current Conversion (No proof it is true yet): (p → q) ∧ (q → p) ≡ (p ∨ q) → (p ∧ q)



      Conditional and Biconditional: (p → q) ∧ (q → p) ≡ p ↔ q



      Current Conversion (No proof it is true yet): p ↔ q ≡ (p ∨ q) → (p ∧ q)



      I have ran them through an online calculator for this type of thing and they are true but I cannot figure out the steps using the different Laws of Algebra of Propositions. If anyone could explain anything, I would be very grateful.







      share|cite|improve this question












      I'm trying to work out a class exercise and I've got myself stuck. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.



      I am to use use algebra of propositions to solve the following problem:



      Show the below is true by the algebra of propositions:



      (¬p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ ¬q) ≡ (p ∨ q) → (p ∧ q)



      Here's what I have done so far:



      Conditional and Biconditional: (¬p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ ¬q) ≡ (p → q) ∧ (q → p)



      Current Conversion (No proof it is true yet): (p → q) ∧ (q → p) ≡ (p ∨ q) → (p ∧ q)



      Conditional and Biconditional: (p → q) ∧ (q → p) ≡ p ↔ q



      Current Conversion (No proof it is true yet): p ↔ q ≡ (p ∨ q) → (p ∧ q)



      I have ran them through an online calculator for this type of thing and they are true but I cannot figure out the steps using the different Laws of Algebra of Propositions. If anyone could explain anything, I would be very grateful.









      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jun 18 '17 at 10:46









      Mcclaine

      133




      133




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          If you can use the following two equivalences:



          $$p leftrightarrow q equiv (p rightarrow q) land (q rightarrow p)$$



          $$p leftrightarrow q equiv (p land q) lor (neg p lor neg p)$$



          Then you are indeed well on your way:



          $$(neg p lor q) land (p lor neg q) text (Commutation)$$



          $$(neg p lor q) land (neg q lor p) text (Implication)$$



          $$(p rightarrow q) land (q rightarrow p) text (Equivalence)$$



          $$p leftrightarrow q equiv text (Equivalence)$$



          $$(p land q) lor (neg p land neg q) text (DeMorgan)$$



          $$(p land q) lor neg (p lor q) text (Commutation)$$



          $$neg (p land q) lor (p land q) text (Implication)$$



          $$(p land q) to (p land q)$$



          However, if you don't have both of those equivalences regarding the biconditional, then you'll have to do it the hard way, and starting at the left will actually be a little easier to follow:



          $$(p lor q) to (p land q) text (Implication)$$



          $$neg (p lor q) lor (p land q) equiv text (DeMorgan)$$



          $$(neg p land neg q) lor (p land q) equiv text (Distribution)$$



          $$((neg p land neg q) lor p) land ((neg p land neg q)lor q) equiv text (Distribution x 2)$$



          $$((neg p lor p) land (neg q lor p)) land ((neg p lor q) land (neg q lor q)) equiv text (Commutation x 3)$$



          $$((p lor neg p) land (p lor neg q)) land ((neg p lor q) land (q lor neg q)) equiv text (Complement x 2)$$



          $$(top land (p lor neg q)) land ((neg p lor q) land top) equiv text (Identity x 2)$$



          $$(p lor neg q) land (neg p lor q) equiv text (Commutation)$$



          $$(neg p lor q) land (p lor neg q)$$






          share|cite|improve this answer






















            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2327151%2flaws-of-algebra-of-propositions-question-attempted-assistance-required%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            1
            down vote













            If you can use the following two equivalences:



            $$p leftrightarrow q equiv (p rightarrow q) land (q rightarrow p)$$



            $$p leftrightarrow q equiv (p land q) lor (neg p lor neg p)$$



            Then you are indeed well on your way:



            $$(neg p lor q) land (p lor neg q) text (Commutation)$$



            $$(neg p lor q) land (neg q lor p) text (Implication)$$



            $$(p rightarrow q) land (q rightarrow p) text (Equivalence)$$



            $$p leftrightarrow q equiv text (Equivalence)$$



            $$(p land q) lor (neg p land neg q) text (DeMorgan)$$



            $$(p land q) lor neg (p lor q) text (Commutation)$$



            $$neg (p land q) lor (p land q) text (Implication)$$



            $$(p land q) to (p land q)$$



            However, if you don't have both of those equivalences regarding the biconditional, then you'll have to do it the hard way, and starting at the left will actually be a little easier to follow:



            $$(p lor q) to (p land q) text (Implication)$$



            $$neg (p lor q) lor (p land q) equiv text (DeMorgan)$$



            $$(neg p land neg q) lor (p land q) equiv text (Distribution)$$



            $$((neg p land neg q) lor p) land ((neg p land neg q)lor q) equiv text (Distribution x 2)$$



            $$((neg p lor p) land (neg q lor p)) land ((neg p lor q) land (neg q lor q)) equiv text (Commutation x 3)$$



            $$((p lor neg p) land (p lor neg q)) land ((neg p lor q) land (q lor neg q)) equiv text (Complement x 2)$$



            $$(top land (p lor neg q)) land ((neg p lor q) land top) equiv text (Identity x 2)$$



            $$(p lor neg q) land (neg p lor q) equiv text (Commutation)$$



            $$(neg p lor q) land (p lor neg q)$$






            share|cite|improve this answer


























              up vote
              1
              down vote













              If you can use the following two equivalences:



              $$p leftrightarrow q equiv (p rightarrow q) land (q rightarrow p)$$



              $$p leftrightarrow q equiv (p land q) lor (neg p lor neg p)$$



              Then you are indeed well on your way:



              $$(neg p lor q) land (p lor neg q) text (Commutation)$$



              $$(neg p lor q) land (neg q lor p) text (Implication)$$



              $$(p rightarrow q) land (q rightarrow p) text (Equivalence)$$



              $$p leftrightarrow q equiv text (Equivalence)$$



              $$(p land q) lor (neg p land neg q) text (DeMorgan)$$



              $$(p land q) lor neg (p lor q) text (Commutation)$$



              $$neg (p land q) lor (p land q) text (Implication)$$



              $$(p land q) to (p land q)$$



              However, if you don't have both of those equivalences regarding the biconditional, then you'll have to do it the hard way, and starting at the left will actually be a little easier to follow:



              $$(p lor q) to (p land q) text (Implication)$$



              $$neg (p lor q) lor (p land q) equiv text (DeMorgan)$$



              $$(neg p land neg q) lor (p land q) equiv text (Distribution)$$



              $$((neg p land neg q) lor p) land ((neg p land neg q)lor q) equiv text (Distribution x 2)$$



              $$((neg p lor p) land (neg q lor p)) land ((neg p lor q) land (neg q lor q)) equiv text (Commutation x 3)$$



              $$((p lor neg p) land (p lor neg q)) land ((neg p lor q) land (q lor neg q)) equiv text (Complement x 2)$$



              $$(top land (p lor neg q)) land ((neg p lor q) land top) equiv text (Identity x 2)$$



              $$(p lor neg q) land (neg p lor q) equiv text (Commutation)$$



              $$(neg p lor q) land (p lor neg q)$$






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                up vote
                1
                down vote










                up vote
                1
                down vote









                If you can use the following two equivalences:



                $$p leftrightarrow q equiv (p rightarrow q) land (q rightarrow p)$$



                $$p leftrightarrow q equiv (p land q) lor (neg p lor neg p)$$



                Then you are indeed well on your way:



                $$(neg p lor q) land (p lor neg q) text (Commutation)$$



                $$(neg p lor q) land (neg q lor p) text (Implication)$$



                $$(p rightarrow q) land (q rightarrow p) text (Equivalence)$$



                $$p leftrightarrow q equiv text (Equivalence)$$



                $$(p land q) lor (neg p land neg q) text (DeMorgan)$$



                $$(p land q) lor neg (p lor q) text (Commutation)$$



                $$neg (p land q) lor (p land q) text (Implication)$$



                $$(p land q) to (p land q)$$



                However, if you don't have both of those equivalences regarding the biconditional, then you'll have to do it the hard way, and starting at the left will actually be a little easier to follow:



                $$(p lor q) to (p land q) text (Implication)$$



                $$neg (p lor q) lor (p land q) equiv text (DeMorgan)$$



                $$(neg p land neg q) lor (p land q) equiv text (Distribution)$$



                $$((neg p land neg q) lor p) land ((neg p land neg q)lor q) equiv text (Distribution x 2)$$



                $$((neg p lor p) land (neg q lor p)) land ((neg p lor q) land (neg q lor q)) equiv text (Commutation x 3)$$



                $$((p lor neg p) land (p lor neg q)) land ((neg p lor q) land (q lor neg q)) equiv text (Complement x 2)$$



                $$(top land (p lor neg q)) land ((neg p lor q) land top) equiv text (Identity x 2)$$



                $$(p lor neg q) land (neg p lor q) equiv text (Commutation)$$



                $$(neg p lor q) land (p lor neg q)$$






                share|cite|improve this answer














                If you can use the following two equivalences:



                $$p leftrightarrow q equiv (p rightarrow q) land (q rightarrow p)$$



                $$p leftrightarrow q equiv (p land q) lor (neg p lor neg p)$$



                Then you are indeed well on your way:



                $$(neg p lor q) land (p lor neg q) text (Commutation)$$



                $$(neg p lor q) land (neg q lor p) text (Implication)$$



                $$(p rightarrow q) land (q rightarrow p) text (Equivalence)$$



                $$p leftrightarrow q equiv text (Equivalence)$$



                $$(p land q) lor (neg p land neg q) text (DeMorgan)$$



                $$(p land q) lor neg (p lor q) text (Commutation)$$



                $$neg (p land q) lor (p land q) text (Implication)$$



                $$(p land q) to (p land q)$$



                However, if you don't have both of those equivalences regarding the biconditional, then you'll have to do it the hard way, and starting at the left will actually be a little easier to follow:



                $$(p lor q) to (p land q) text (Implication)$$



                $$neg (p lor q) lor (p land q) equiv text (DeMorgan)$$



                $$(neg p land neg q) lor (p land q) equiv text (Distribution)$$



                $$((neg p land neg q) lor p) land ((neg p land neg q)lor q) equiv text (Distribution x 2)$$



                $$((neg p lor p) land (neg q lor p)) land ((neg p lor q) land (neg q lor q)) equiv text (Commutation x 3)$$



                $$((p lor neg p) land (p lor neg q)) land ((neg p lor q) land (q lor neg q)) equiv text (Complement x 2)$$



                $$(top land (p lor neg q)) land ((neg p lor q) land top) equiv text (Identity x 2)$$



                $$(p lor neg q) land (neg p lor q) equiv text (Commutation)$$



                $$(neg p lor q) land (p lor neg q)$$







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Jun 18 '17 at 12:58

























                answered Jun 18 '17 at 11:04









                Bram28

                55.5k33982




                55.5k33982



























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2327151%2flaws-of-algebra-of-propositions-question-attempted-assistance-required%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    3ms,NdNT3I NXR9cmW7gHXUSOz,1pz fZB87E4uD1iqSXkFfSuyllb8r moj,Rpb5hgLA7cCn3mf
                    5iuW2J,5uX84J QbvoblfvDV MW brcE nM0ZObtQWi kqWMG dbV

                    這個網誌中的熱門文章

                    How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

                    Propositional logic and tautologies

                    Distribution of Stopped Wiener Process with Stochastic Volatility