Hatcher's, tensor product of vector bundles : topology explained

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












So this is a sumamry of the construction given in pg14 of Hatchers of the tensor of two vector bundles:




Let $p_1:E _1 rightarrow B$, and $p_2 : E_2 rightarrow B$. We define $E_1 otimes E_2$ to be the disjoint union of vector spaces $p^-1(chi) otimes p_2^-1(chi)$ for $chi in B$ with the following topology:



We take an open cover of $B$ over which both initial bundles are trivial. Choose hoemomoprhisms,
$$h_i:p_i^-1(U) rightarrow U times mathbbR^n_i$$
for each open set $U$ in such a cover. The topology on $tau_U$ on the set $p_1^-1(U) otimes p_2^-1(U)$ is defined by letting the tensor product map
$$h_1 otimes h_2: p^-1_1(U) otimes p_2^-1(U) rightarrow U times (mathbbR^n_1 otimes mathbbR^n_2)$$




I am just confused with what exactly is meant here. So then what is the topology on $E_1 otimes E_2$? I suppose it is the colimit topology from the open cover.







share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite












    So this is a sumamry of the construction given in pg14 of Hatchers of the tensor of two vector bundles:




    Let $p_1:E _1 rightarrow B$, and $p_2 : E_2 rightarrow B$. We define $E_1 otimes E_2$ to be the disjoint union of vector spaces $p^-1(chi) otimes p_2^-1(chi)$ for $chi in B$ with the following topology:



    We take an open cover of $B$ over which both initial bundles are trivial. Choose hoemomoprhisms,
    $$h_i:p_i^-1(U) rightarrow U times mathbbR^n_i$$
    for each open set $U$ in such a cover. The topology on $tau_U$ on the set $p_1^-1(U) otimes p_2^-1(U)$ is defined by letting the tensor product map
    $$h_1 otimes h_2: p^-1_1(U) otimes p_2^-1(U) rightarrow U times (mathbbR^n_1 otimes mathbbR^n_2)$$




    I am just confused with what exactly is meant here. So then what is the topology on $E_1 otimes E_2$? I suppose it is the colimit topology from the open cover.







    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite











      So this is a sumamry of the construction given in pg14 of Hatchers of the tensor of two vector bundles:




      Let $p_1:E _1 rightarrow B$, and $p_2 : E_2 rightarrow B$. We define $E_1 otimes E_2$ to be the disjoint union of vector spaces $p^-1(chi) otimes p_2^-1(chi)$ for $chi in B$ with the following topology:



      We take an open cover of $B$ over which both initial bundles are trivial. Choose hoemomoprhisms,
      $$h_i:p_i^-1(U) rightarrow U times mathbbR^n_i$$
      for each open set $U$ in such a cover. The topology on $tau_U$ on the set $p_1^-1(U) otimes p_2^-1(U)$ is defined by letting the tensor product map
      $$h_1 otimes h_2: p^-1_1(U) otimes p_2^-1(U) rightarrow U times (mathbbR^n_1 otimes mathbbR^n_2)$$




      I am just confused with what exactly is meant here. So then what is the topology on $E_1 otimes E_2$? I suppose it is the colimit topology from the open cover.







      share|cite|improve this question














      So this is a sumamry of the construction given in pg14 of Hatchers of the tensor of two vector bundles:




      Let $p_1:E _1 rightarrow B$, and $p_2 : E_2 rightarrow B$. We define $E_1 otimes E_2$ to be the disjoint union of vector spaces $p^-1(chi) otimes p_2^-1(chi)$ for $chi in B$ with the following topology:



      We take an open cover of $B$ over which both initial bundles are trivial. Choose hoemomoprhisms,
      $$h_i:p_i^-1(U) rightarrow U times mathbbR^n_i$$
      for each open set $U$ in such a cover. The topology on $tau_U$ on the set $p_1^-1(U) otimes p_2^-1(U)$ is defined by letting the tensor product map
      $$h_1 otimes h_2: p^-1_1(U) otimes p_2^-1(U) rightarrow U times (mathbbR^n_1 otimes mathbbR^n_2)$$




      I am just confused with what exactly is meant here. So then what is the topology on $E_1 otimes E_2$? I suppose it is the colimit topology from the open cover.









      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Aug 25 at 6:40

























      asked Aug 25 at 3:14









      Cyryl L.

      1,7702821




      1,7702821




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          You are right. That is the usual procedure to topologize a "bundle" over a base space $B$ which is given by associating to each $b in B$ a vector space $E_b$. Define $E= bigcup_b in B b times E_b$ = disjoint union of the fibers $E_b$ and $p : E to B, p(b,e_b) = b$. Assume you have an open cover $mathcalU$ of $B$ and for each $U in mathcalU$ an "algebraic bundle isomorphism" $h_U : p^-1(U) to U times mathbbR^n$ (that is, $h_U(b,e_b) = (b, phi_U^b(e_b))$ with linear isomorphism $phi_U^b : E_b to mathbbR^n$, $b in U$). If the obvious compatibility conditions are satisfied (the transition functions between the "bundle charts" $h_U$ have to be homeomorphisms), then you can topologize $E$ by



          (1) giving each $p^-1(U)$ the unique topology making $h_U$ a homeomorphism



          (2) giving $E$ the colimit topology from the cover $p^-1(U)$, $U in mathcalU$.



          In your case the situation is that any two (topological) bundle charts $h_i : p_i^-1(U) to U times mathbbR^n_i$ provide an algebraic bundle isomorphism $h_1 otimes h_2: p^-1_1(U) otimes p_2^-1(U) rightarrow U times (mathbbR^n_1 otimes mathbbR^n_2)$. You have to check compatibility and you are done.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2893779%2fhatchers-tensor-product-of-vector-bundles-topology-explained%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            2
            down vote



            accepted










            You are right. That is the usual procedure to topologize a "bundle" over a base space $B$ which is given by associating to each $b in B$ a vector space $E_b$. Define $E= bigcup_b in B b times E_b$ = disjoint union of the fibers $E_b$ and $p : E to B, p(b,e_b) = b$. Assume you have an open cover $mathcalU$ of $B$ and for each $U in mathcalU$ an "algebraic bundle isomorphism" $h_U : p^-1(U) to U times mathbbR^n$ (that is, $h_U(b,e_b) = (b, phi_U^b(e_b))$ with linear isomorphism $phi_U^b : E_b to mathbbR^n$, $b in U$). If the obvious compatibility conditions are satisfied (the transition functions between the "bundle charts" $h_U$ have to be homeomorphisms), then you can topologize $E$ by



            (1) giving each $p^-1(U)$ the unique topology making $h_U$ a homeomorphism



            (2) giving $E$ the colimit topology from the cover $p^-1(U)$, $U in mathcalU$.



            In your case the situation is that any two (topological) bundle charts $h_i : p_i^-1(U) to U times mathbbR^n_i$ provide an algebraic bundle isomorphism $h_1 otimes h_2: p^-1_1(U) otimes p_2^-1(U) rightarrow U times (mathbbR^n_1 otimes mathbbR^n_2)$. You have to check compatibility and you are done.






            share|cite|improve this answer


























              up vote
              2
              down vote



              accepted










              You are right. That is the usual procedure to topologize a "bundle" over a base space $B$ which is given by associating to each $b in B$ a vector space $E_b$. Define $E= bigcup_b in B b times E_b$ = disjoint union of the fibers $E_b$ and $p : E to B, p(b,e_b) = b$. Assume you have an open cover $mathcalU$ of $B$ and for each $U in mathcalU$ an "algebraic bundle isomorphism" $h_U : p^-1(U) to U times mathbbR^n$ (that is, $h_U(b,e_b) = (b, phi_U^b(e_b))$ with linear isomorphism $phi_U^b : E_b to mathbbR^n$, $b in U$). If the obvious compatibility conditions are satisfied (the transition functions between the "bundle charts" $h_U$ have to be homeomorphisms), then you can topologize $E$ by



              (1) giving each $p^-1(U)$ the unique topology making $h_U$ a homeomorphism



              (2) giving $E$ the colimit topology from the cover $p^-1(U)$, $U in mathcalU$.



              In your case the situation is that any two (topological) bundle charts $h_i : p_i^-1(U) to U times mathbbR^n_i$ provide an algebraic bundle isomorphism $h_1 otimes h_2: p^-1_1(U) otimes p_2^-1(U) rightarrow U times (mathbbR^n_1 otimes mathbbR^n_2)$. You have to check compatibility and you are done.






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                up vote
                2
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                2
                down vote



                accepted






                You are right. That is the usual procedure to topologize a "bundle" over a base space $B$ which is given by associating to each $b in B$ a vector space $E_b$. Define $E= bigcup_b in B b times E_b$ = disjoint union of the fibers $E_b$ and $p : E to B, p(b,e_b) = b$. Assume you have an open cover $mathcalU$ of $B$ and for each $U in mathcalU$ an "algebraic bundle isomorphism" $h_U : p^-1(U) to U times mathbbR^n$ (that is, $h_U(b,e_b) = (b, phi_U^b(e_b))$ with linear isomorphism $phi_U^b : E_b to mathbbR^n$, $b in U$). If the obvious compatibility conditions are satisfied (the transition functions between the "bundle charts" $h_U$ have to be homeomorphisms), then you can topologize $E$ by



                (1) giving each $p^-1(U)$ the unique topology making $h_U$ a homeomorphism



                (2) giving $E$ the colimit topology from the cover $p^-1(U)$, $U in mathcalU$.



                In your case the situation is that any two (topological) bundle charts $h_i : p_i^-1(U) to U times mathbbR^n_i$ provide an algebraic bundle isomorphism $h_1 otimes h_2: p^-1_1(U) otimes p_2^-1(U) rightarrow U times (mathbbR^n_1 otimes mathbbR^n_2)$. You have to check compatibility and you are done.






                share|cite|improve this answer














                You are right. That is the usual procedure to topologize a "bundle" over a base space $B$ which is given by associating to each $b in B$ a vector space $E_b$. Define $E= bigcup_b in B b times E_b$ = disjoint union of the fibers $E_b$ and $p : E to B, p(b,e_b) = b$. Assume you have an open cover $mathcalU$ of $B$ and for each $U in mathcalU$ an "algebraic bundle isomorphism" $h_U : p^-1(U) to U times mathbbR^n$ (that is, $h_U(b,e_b) = (b, phi_U^b(e_b))$ with linear isomorphism $phi_U^b : E_b to mathbbR^n$, $b in U$). If the obvious compatibility conditions are satisfied (the transition functions between the "bundle charts" $h_U$ have to be homeomorphisms), then you can topologize $E$ by



                (1) giving each $p^-1(U)$ the unique topology making $h_U$ a homeomorphism



                (2) giving $E$ the colimit topology from the cover $p^-1(U)$, $U in mathcalU$.



                In your case the situation is that any two (topological) bundle charts $h_i : p_i^-1(U) to U times mathbbR^n_i$ provide an algebraic bundle isomorphism $h_1 otimes h_2: p^-1_1(U) otimes p_2^-1(U) rightarrow U times (mathbbR^n_1 otimes mathbbR^n_2)$. You have to check compatibility and you are done.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Aug 25 at 9:22

























                answered Aug 25 at 9:12









                Paul Frost

                4,783424




                4,783424



























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2893779%2fhatchers-tensor-product-of-vector-bundles-topology-explained%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    這個網誌中的熱門文章

                    How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

                    Carbon dioxide

                    Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?