Check measure theory argument
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I'm trying to solve the following exercise.
[Cohn, 2.3.5] Let $(X, mathscrA, mu)$ be a measure space, and $f: X to [-infty, +infty]$ an $mathscrA$-measurable function whose integral exists and is not equal to $-infty$. Show that if $g: X to [-infty, +infty]$ is $mathscrA$-measurable and satisfies $f leq g$ for $mu$-almost every $x in X$, then the integral of $g$ exists and satisfies $int g , dmu geq int f , dmu$.
Here's what I did.
Suppose that $S$ and $T$ are $[0, +infty]$-valued $mathscrA$-measurable functions on $X$ such that $S leq T$ for $mu$-almost every $x$, and let $A = x : S(x) = T(x)$. Write $tildeT = mathbf1_A T +h$, where $h(x) = +infty$ on $A^c$, and else $h(x) = 0$. It's clear that $int h = 0$ (take $h_n = n mathbb1_A^c$. the functions $h_n$ are simple, $h_n uparrow h$, and thus $int h = lim (n mu(A^c)) = 0$.). Additionally, $int S leq int tildeT$, since $S leq tildeT$ everywhere and any simple function $phi$ satisfying $phi leq S$ also satisfies $phi leq tildeT$. By linearity, $int tildeT = int_A T = int T$, with the last equality due to $0 leq mathbf1_A^c T leq h$.
Now decompose $f =f^+ - f^-$and $g = g^+ - g^-$ as is standard. At once, $g^+ geq f^+$ and $g^- leq f^-$ almost everywhere hold. Thus, by the argument above, one obtains $int g^+ geq int f^+$ and $int g^- leq int f^- < +infty$ (the last inequality follows because if $int f^+ < infty$, then $int f^- < +infty$, otherwise $int f = -infty$). This implies $int g$ exists and further,
$$
int g = int g^+ - int g^- geq int f^+ - int f^- = int f.
$$
This is the desired result.
Does that look fine?
measure-theory proof-verification
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I'm trying to solve the following exercise.
[Cohn, 2.3.5] Let $(X, mathscrA, mu)$ be a measure space, and $f: X to [-infty, +infty]$ an $mathscrA$-measurable function whose integral exists and is not equal to $-infty$. Show that if $g: X to [-infty, +infty]$ is $mathscrA$-measurable and satisfies $f leq g$ for $mu$-almost every $x in X$, then the integral of $g$ exists and satisfies $int g , dmu geq int f , dmu$.
Here's what I did.
Suppose that $S$ and $T$ are $[0, +infty]$-valued $mathscrA$-measurable functions on $X$ such that $S leq T$ for $mu$-almost every $x$, and let $A = x : S(x) = T(x)$. Write $tildeT = mathbf1_A T +h$, where $h(x) = +infty$ on $A^c$, and else $h(x) = 0$. It's clear that $int h = 0$ (take $h_n = n mathbb1_A^c$. the functions $h_n$ are simple, $h_n uparrow h$, and thus $int h = lim (n mu(A^c)) = 0$.). Additionally, $int S leq int tildeT$, since $S leq tildeT$ everywhere and any simple function $phi$ satisfying $phi leq S$ also satisfies $phi leq tildeT$. By linearity, $int tildeT = int_A T = int T$, with the last equality due to $0 leq mathbf1_A^c T leq h$.
Now decompose $f =f^+ - f^-$and $g = g^+ - g^-$ as is standard. At once, $g^+ geq f^+$ and $g^- leq f^-$ almost everywhere hold. Thus, by the argument above, one obtains $int g^+ geq int f^+$ and $int g^- leq int f^- < +infty$ (the last inequality follows because if $int f^+ < infty$, then $int f^- < +infty$, otherwise $int f = -infty$). This implies $int g$ exists and further,
$$
int g = int g^+ - int g^- geq int f^+ - int f^- = int f.
$$
This is the desired result.
Does that look fine?
measure-theory proof-verification
Looks good to me.
â pointguard0
Aug 25 at 9:09
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I'm trying to solve the following exercise.
[Cohn, 2.3.5] Let $(X, mathscrA, mu)$ be a measure space, and $f: X to [-infty, +infty]$ an $mathscrA$-measurable function whose integral exists and is not equal to $-infty$. Show that if $g: X to [-infty, +infty]$ is $mathscrA$-measurable and satisfies $f leq g$ for $mu$-almost every $x in X$, then the integral of $g$ exists and satisfies $int g , dmu geq int f , dmu$.
Here's what I did.
Suppose that $S$ and $T$ are $[0, +infty]$-valued $mathscrA$-measurable functions on $X$ such that $S leq T$ for $mu$-almost every $x$, and let $A = x : S(x) = T(x)$. Write $tildeT = mathbf1_A T +h$, where $h(x) = +infty$ on $A^c$, and else $h(x) = 0$. It's clear that $int h = 0$ (take $h_n = n mathbb1_A^c$. the functions $h_n$ are simple, $h_n uparrow h$, and thus $int h = lim (n mu(A^c)) = 0$.). Additionally, $int S leq int tildeT$, since $S leq tildeT$ everywhere and any simple function $phi$ satisfying $phi leq S$ also satisfies $phi leq tildeT$. By linearity, $int tildeT = int_A T = int T$, with the last equality due to $0 leq mathbf1_A^c T leq h$.
Now decompose $f =f^+ - f^-$and $g = g^+ - g^-$ as is standard. At once, $g^+ geq f^+$ and $g^- leq f^-$ almost everywhere hold. Thus, by the argument above, one obtains $int g^+ geq int f^+$ and $int g^- leq int f^- < +infty$ (the last inequality follows because if $int f^+ < infty$, then $int f^- < +infty$, otherwise $int f = -infty$). This implies $int g$ exists and further,
$$
int g = int g^+ - int g^- geq int f^+ - int f^- = int f.
$$
This is the desired result.
Does that look fine?
measure-theory proof-verification
I'm trying to solve the following exercise.
[Cohn, 2.3.5] Let $(X, mathscrA, mu)$ be a measure space, and $f: X to [-infty, +infty]$ an $mathscrA$-measurable function whose integral exists and is not equal to $-infty$. Show that if $g: X to [-infty, +infty]$ is $mathscrA$-measurable and satisfies $f leq g$ for $mu$-almost every $x in X$, then the integral of $g$ exists and satisfies $int g , dmu geq int f , dmu$.
Here's what I did.
Suppose that $S$ and $T$ are $[0, +infty]$-valued $mathscrA$-measurable functions on $X$ such that $S leq T$ for $mu$-almost every $x$, and let $A = x : S(x) = T(x)$. Write $tildeT = mathbf1_A T +h$, where $h(x) = +infty$ on $A^c$, and else $h(x) = 0$. It's clear that $int h = 0$ (take $h_n = n mathbb1_A^c$. the functions $h_n$ are simple, $h_n uparrow h$, and thus $int h = lim (n mu(A^c)) = 0$.). Additionally, $int S leq int tildeT$, since $S leq tildeT$ everywhere and any simple function $phi$ satisfying $phi leq S$ also satisfies $phi leq tildeT$. By linearity, $int tildeT = int_A T = int T$, with the last equality due to $0 leq mathbf1_A^c T leq h$.
Now decompose $f =f^+ - f^-$and $g = g^+ - g^-$ as is standard. At once, $g^+ geq f^+$ and $g^- leq f^-$ almost everywhere hold. Thus, by the argument above, one obtains $int g^+ geq int f^+$ and $int g^- leq int f^- < +infty$ (the last inequality follows because if $int f^+ < infty$, then $int f^- < +infty$, otherwise $int f = -infty$). This implies $int g$ exists and further,
$$
int g = int g^+ - int g^- geq int f^+ - int f^- = int f.
$$
This is the desired result.
Does that look fine?
measure-theory proof-verification
edited Aug 25 at 19:08
asked Aug 25 at 8:37
Drew Brady
523214
523214
Looks good to me.
â pointguard0
Aug 25 at 9:09
add a comment |Â
Looks good to me.
â pointguard0
Aug 25 at 9:09
Looks good to me.
â pointguard0
Aug 25 at 9:09
Looks good to me.
â pointguard0
Aug 25 at 9:09
add a comment |Â
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2893902%2fcheck-measure-theory-argument%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Looks good to me.
â pointguard0
Aug 25 at 9:09