Show that $F(x):=(n-1)x-frac(n-1)n2$ for $xin[n-1,n), nin N$ is continuous in $x=n$

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












So my attempt to solve this is that i know how the behavior of the function, i.e, it will go for



$n=1: [0,1)$ and $F(x)=0$, $forall$ $xin[0,1)$



Then the graphic will go on the x from 0 to 1 and in 1 it will be empty but in



$n=2: [1,2)$ and $F(x)=x-1,$ $forall$ $xin[1,2)$



and then in 1 the hole will be filled but again, in 2 it will have a hole



and so on



$n=3: [2,3)$ and $F(x)=2x-3$



And i want to establish that



$lim_xto n F(x)=F(n)$



and by definition $epsilon$-$delta$ of continuity i want to make it sure that $F$ is derivable at $x=n$ for $nin N$



Please can you guys help me with this one? i have/know the idea but as always i dont know how to write it







share|cite|improve this question




















  • You can try to compute the limit of $F(x)$ as $x$ approaches $n$ from the left and from the right and show that they are equal.
    – user9077
    Aug 25 at 0:30










  • Yes, i think that part i have it, but the part that i have trouble is write by definition of epsilon and delta
    – Daniel ML
    Aug 25 at 1:14














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












So my attempt to solve this is that i know how the behavior of the function, i.e, it will go for



$n=1: [0,1)$ and $F(x)=0$, $forall$ $xin[0,1)$



Then the graphic will go on the x from 0 to 1 and in 1 it will be empty but in



$n=2: [1,2)$ and $F(x)=x-1,$ $forall$ $xin[1,2)$



and then in 1 the hole will be filled but again, in 2 it will have a hole



and so on



$n=3: [2,3)$ and $F(x)=2x-3$



And i want to establish that



$lim_xto n F(x)=F(n)$



and by definition $epsilon$-$delta$ of continuity i want to make it sure that $F$ is derivable at $x=n$ for $nin N$



Please can you guys help me with this one? i have/know the idea but as always i dont know how to write it







share|cite|improve this question




















  • You can try to compute the limit of $F(x)$ as $x$ approaches $n$ from the left and from the right and show that they are equal.
    – user9077
    Aug 25 at 0:30










  • Yes, i think that part i have it, but the part that i have trouble is write by definition of epsilon and delta
    – Daniel ML
    Aug 25 at 1:14












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











So my attempt to solve this is that i know how the behavior of the function, i.e, it will go for



$n=1: [0,1)$ and $F(x)=0$, $forall$ $xin[0,1)$



Then the graphic will go on the x from 0 to 1 and in 1 it will be empty but in



$n=2: [1,2)$ and $F(x)=x-1,$ $forall$ $xin[1,2)$



and then in 1 the hole will be filled but again, in 2 it will have a hole



and so on



$n=3: [2,3)$ and $F(x)=2x-3$



And i want to establish that



$lim_xto n F(x)=F(n)$



and by definition $epsilon$-$delta$ of continuity i want to make it sure that $F$ is derivable at $x=n$ for $nin N$



Please can you guys help me with this one? i have/know the idea but as always i dont know how to write it







share|cite|improve this question












So my attempt to solve this is that i know how the behavior of the function, i.e, it will go for



$n=1: [0,1)$ and $F(x)=0$, $forall$ $xin[0,1)$



Then the graphic will go on the x from 0 to 1 and in 1 it will be empty but in



$n=2: [1,2)$ and $F(x)=x-1,$ $forall$ $xin[1,2)$



and then in 1 the hole will be filled but again, in 2 it will have a hole



and so on



$n=3: [2,3)$ and $F(x)=2x-3$



And i want to establish that



$lim_xto n F(x)=F(n)$



and by definition $epsilon$-$delta$ of continuity i want to make it sure that $F$ is derivable at $x=n$ for $nin N$



Please can you guys help me with this one? i have/know the idea but as always i dont know how to write it









share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Aug 25 at 0:26









Daniel ML

133




133











  • You can try to compute the limit of $F(x)$ as $x$ approaches $n$ from the left and from the right and show that they are equal.
    – user9077
    Aug 25 at 0:30










  • Yes, i think that part i have it, but the part that i have trouble is write by definition of epsilon and delta
    – Daniel ML
    Aug 25 at 1:14
















  • You can try to compute the limit of $F(x)$ as $x$ approaches $n$ from the left and from the right and show that they are equal.
    – user9077
    Aug 25 at 0:30










  • Yes, i think that part i have it, but the part that i have trouble is write by definition of epsilon and delta
    – Daniel ML
    Aug 25 at 1:14















You can try to compute the limit of $F(x)$ as $x$ approaches $n$ from the left and from the right and show that they are equal.
– user9077
Aug 25 at 0:30




You can try to compute the limit of $F(x)$ as $x$ approaches $n$ from the left and from the right and show that they are equal.
– user9077
Aug 25 at 0:30












Yes, i think that part i have it, but the part that i have trouble is write by definition of epsilon and delta
– Daniel ML
Aug 25 at 1:14




Yes, i think that part i have it, but the part that i have trouble is write by definition of epsilon and delta
– Daniel ML
Aug 25 at 1:14










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote



accepted










We claim that $lim_xto n F(x)=n(n-1)/2=F(n)$.



Given $epsilon >0$, take $delta=fracepsilonn$.



If $0<n-x<delta=epsilon/n$ then $x<n$, so we use $F(x)$ on the interval $[n-1,n)$ which is $F(x):=(n-1)x-frac(n-1)n2$. Then $|F(x)-n(n-1)/2|=|(n-1)x-n(n-1)|=(n-1)(n-x)<(n-1)cdot delta=(n-1)fracepsilonn<epsilon$.



If $0leq x-n<delta=epsilon/n$ we have $xgeq n$ so we use $F(x)$ on the interval $[n,n+1)$ which is $F(x)=nx-n(n+1)/2$.



Now $|F(x)-n(n-1)/2)|=|nx-n^2|=n(x-n)<ndelta=ncdot fracepsilonn=epsilon$.






share|cite|improve this answer




















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2893697%2fshow-that-fx-n-1x-fracn-1n2-for-x-inn-1-n-n-in-n-is-continuou%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote



    accepted










    We claim that $lim_xto n F(x)=n(n-1)/2=F(n)$.



    Given $epsilon >0$, take $delta=fracepsilonn$.



    If $0<n-x<delta=epsilon/n$ then $x<n$, so we use $F(x)$ on the interval $[n-1,n)$ which is $F(x):=(n-1)x-frac(n-1)n2$. Then $|F(x)-n(n-1)/2|=|(n-1)x-n(n-1)|=(n-1)(n-x)<(n-1)cdot delta=(n-1)fracepsilonn<epsilon$.



    If $0leq x-n<delta=epsilon/n$ we have $xgeq n$ so we use $F(x)$ on the interval $[n,n+1)$ which is $F(x)=nx-n(n+1)/2$.



    Now $|F(x)-n(n-1)/2)|=|nx-n^2|=n(x-n)<ndelta=ncdot fracepsilonn=epsilon$.






    share|cite|improve this answer
























      up vote
      0
      down vote



      accepted










      We claim that $lim_xto n F(x)=n(n-1)/2=F(n)$.



      Given $epsilon >0$, take $delta=fracepsilonn$.



      If $0<n-x<delta=epsilon/n$ then $x<n$, so we use $F(x)$ on the interval $[n-1,n)$ which is $F(x):=(n-1)x-frac(n-1)n2$. Then $|F(x)-n(n-1)/2|=|(n-1)x-n(n-1)|=(n-1)(n-x)<(n-1)cdot delta=(n-1)fracepsilonn<epsilon$.



      If $0leq x-n<delta=epsilon/n$ we have $xgeq n$ so we use $F(x)$ on the interval $[n,n+1)$ which is $F(x)=nx-n(n+1)/2$.



      Now $|F(x)-n(n-1)/2)|=|nx-n^2|=n(x-n)<ndelta=ncdot fracepsilonn=epsilon$.






      share|cite|improve this answer






















        up vote
        0
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        0
        down vote



        accepted






        We claim that $lim_xto n F(x)=n(n-1)/2=F(n)$.



        Given $epsilon >0$, take $delta=fracepsilonn$.



        If $0<n-x<delta=epsilon/n$ then $x<n$, so we use $F(x)$ on the interval $[n-1,n)$ which is $F(x):=(n-1)x-frac(n-1)n2$. Then $|F(x)-n(n-1)/2|=|(n-1)x-n(n-1)|=(n-1)(n-x)<(n-1)cdot delta=(n-1)fracepsilonn<epsilon$.



        If $0leq x-n<delta=epsilon/n$ we have $xgeq n$ so we use $F(x)$ on the interval $[n,n+1)$ which is $F(x)=nx-n(n+1)/2$.



        Now $|F(x)-n(n-1)/2)|=|nx-n^2|=n(x-n)<ndelta=ncdot fracepsilonn=epsilon$.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        We claim that $lim_xto n F(x)=n(n-1)/2=F(n)$.



        Given $epsilon >0$, take $delta=fracepsilonn$.



        If $0<n-x<delta=epsilon/n$ then $x<n$, so we use $F(x)$ on the interval $[n-1,n)$ which is $F(x):=(n-1)x-frac(n-1)n2$. Then $|F(x)-n(n-1)/2|=|(n-1)x-n(n-1)|=(n-1)(n-x)<(n-1)cdot delta=(n-1)fracepsilonn<epsilon$.



        If $0leq x-n<delta=epsilon/n$ we have $xgeq n$ so we use $F(x)$ on the interval $[n,n+1)$ which is $F(x)=nx-n(n+1)/2$.



        Now $|F(x)-n(n-1)/2)|=|nx-n^2|=n(x-n)<ndelta=ncdot fracepsilonn=epsilon$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Aug 25 at 7:06









        user9077

        774312




        774312



























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2893697%2fshow-that-fx-n-1x-fracn-1n2-for-x-inn-1-n-n-in-n-is-continuou%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            這個網誌中的熱門文章

            tkz-euclide: tkzDrawCircle[R] not working

            How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

            1st Magritte Awards