Check this measure theory argument

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1












Here's a problem from Cohn's Measure Theory.




[Cohn, 2.1.3] Let $f$ and $g$ be continuous real-valued functions on $mathbbR$. Show that if $f =g$ for $lambda$-almost every $x$, then $f = g$ everywhere.




Here $lambda$ denotes Lebesgue measure.



Here's what I do.



Let $h: mathbbR to mathbbR$ be a continuous function. Suppose that $h neq 0$. Then for some $x in mathbbR$, there is $n in mathbbN$ such that $|h(x)| > 2/n$. Then by continuity for some $delta > 0$, we may ensure that whenever $|y - x| < delta/2$, we have
$$
|h(y)| geq |h(x)| - |h(y) - h(x)| > 2/n - 1/n = 1/n.
$$
Hence, $lambda(h neq 0) geq lambda( > 1/n) geq delta > 0$. Taking the contrapositive, we just showed if $h$ is a continuous real-valued function on $mathbbR$, then
$lambdah neq 0 = 0$ implies $h = 0$ (everywhere). The result follows now by setting $h = f - g$, which is continuous.



Question. Is this basically the simplest way to do it? Other ways?







share|cite|improve this question






















  • That's basically sound, but you could be more concise.
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Aug 25 at 3:17














up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1












Here's a problem from Cohn's Measure Theory.




[Cohn, 2.1.3] Let $f$ and $g$ be continuous real-valued functions on $mathbbR$. Show that if $f =g$ for $lambda$-almost every $x$, then $f = g$ everywhere.




Here $lambda$ denotes Lebesgue measure.



Here's what I do.



Let $h: mathbbR to mathbbR$ be a continuous function. Suppose that $h neq 0$. Then for some $x in mathbbR$, there is $n in mathbbN$ such that $|h(x)| > 2/n$. Then by continuity for some $delta > 0$, we may ensure that whenever $|y - x| < delta/2$, we have
$$
|h(y)| geq |h(x)| - |h(y) - h(x)| > 2/n - 1/n = 1/n.
$$
Hence, $lambda(h neq 0) geq lambda( > 1/n) geq delta > 0$. Taking the contrapositive, we just showed if $h$ is a continuous real-valued function on $mathbbR$, then
$lambdah neq 0 = 0$ implies $h = 0$ (everywhere). The result follows now by setting $h = f - g$, which is continuous.



Question. Is this basically the simplest way to do it? Other ways?







share|cite|improve this question






















  • That's basically sound, but you could be more concise.
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Aug 25 at 3:17












up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1






1





Here's a problem from Cohn's Measure Theory.




[Cohn, 2.1.3] Let $f$ and $g$ be continuous real-valued functions on $mathbbR$. Show that if $f =g$ for $lambda$-almost every $x$, then $f = g$ everywhere.




Here $lambda$ denotes Lebesgue measure.



Here's what I do.



Let $h: mathbbR to mathbbR$ be a continuous function. Suppose that $h neq 0$. Then for some $x in mathbbR$, there is $n in mathbbN$ such that $|h(x)| > 2/n$. Then by continuity for some $delta > 0$, we may ensure that whenever $|y - x| < delta/2$, we have
$$
|h(y)| geq |h(x)| - |h(y) - h(x)| > 2/n - 1/n = 1/n.
$$
Hence, $lambda(h neq 0) geq lambda( > 1/n) geq delta > 0$. Taking the contrapositive, we just showed if $h$ is a continuous real-valued function on $mathbbR$, then
$lambdah neq 0 = 0$ implies $h = 0$ (everywhere). The result follows now by setting $h = f - g$, which is continuous.



Question. Is this basically the simplest way to do it? Other ways?







share|cite|improve this question














Here's a problem from Cohn's Measure Theory.




[Cohn, 2.1.3] Let $f$ and $g$ be continuous real-valued functions on $mathbbR$. Show that if $f =g$ for $lambda$-almost every $x$, then $f = g$ everywhere.




Here $lambda$ denotes Lebesgue measure.



Here's what I do.



Let $h: mathbbR to mathbbR$ be a continuous function. Suppose that $h neq 0$. Then for some $x in mathbbR$, there is $n in mathbbN$ such that $|h(x)| > 2/n$. Then by continuity for some $delta > 0$, we may ensure that whenever $|y - x| < delta/2$, we have
$$
|h(y)| geq |h(x)| - |h(y) - h(x)| > 2/n - 1/n = 1/n.
$$
Hence, $lambda(h neq 0) geq lambda( > 1/n) geq delta > 0$. Taking the contrapositive, we just showed if $h$ is a continuous real-valued function on $mathbbR$, then
$lambdah neq 0 = 0$ implies $h = 0$ (everywhere). The result follows now by setting $h = f - g$, which is continuous.



Question. Is this basically the simplest way to do it? Other ways?









share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 25 at 2:31

























asked Aug 25 at 2:18









Drew Brady

523214




523214











  • That's basically sound, but you could be more concise.
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Aug 25 at 3:17
















  • That's basically sound, but you could be more concise.
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Aug 25 at 3:17















That's basically sound, but you could be more concise.
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Aug 25 at 3:17




That's basically sound, but you could be more concise.
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Aug 25 at 3:17










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote



accepted










I would say that $x:h(x)ne0$ is an open set in $Bbb R$. (Since it is
the inverse image of the open set $Bbb Rsetminus0$ under the continuous
function $h$). Each nonempty open set contains a nonempty open interval,
which has positive Lebesgue measure. So if $h$ is continuous, and not identically
zero, then it cannot be almost everywhere zero (w.r.t. Lebesgue measure).






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Hey, I appreciate the critique, that's the kind of thing that could be helpful for another problem!
    – Drew Brady
    Aug 25 at 3:26

















up vote
-1
down vote













(For completeness, following Lord Shark the Unknown's advice.)



Let $h: mathbbR to mathbbR$ be a continuous function. Suppose that $h neq 0$. Thus, the set $h neq 0$ is nonempty and open, and hence has positive Lebesgue measure. Taking the contrapositive, if $h$ is a continuous real-valued function on $mathbbR$, then $lambdah neq 0 = 0$ implies $h = 0$ (everywhere). Now take $h = f - g$. The result follows.






share|cite|improve this answer




















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2893751%2fcheck-this-measure-theory-argument%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    3
    down vote



    accepted










    I would say that $x:h(x)ne0$ is an open set in $Bbb R$. (Since it is
    the inverse image of the open set $Bbb Rsetminus0$ under the continuous
    function $h$). Each nonempty open set contains a nonempty open interval,
    which has positive Lebesgue measure. So if $h$ is continuous, and not identically
    zero, then it cannot be almost everywhere zero (w.r.t. Lebesgue measure).






    share|cite|improve this answer




















    • Hey, I appreciate the critique, that's the kind of thing that could be helpful for another problem!
      – Drew Brady
      Aug 25 at 3:26














    up vote
    3
    down vote



    accepted










    I would say that $x:h(x)ne0$ is an open set in $Bbb R$. (Since it is
    the inverse image of the open set $Bbb Rsetminus0$ under the continuous
    function $h$). Each nonempty open set contains a nonempty open interval,
    which has positive Lebesgue measure. So if $h$ is continuous, and not identically
    zero, then it cannot be almost everywhere zero (w.r.t. Lebesgue measure).






    share|cite|improve this answer




















    • Hey, I appreciate the critique, that's the kind of thing that could be helpful for another problem!
      – Drew Brady
      Aug 25 at 3:26












    up vote
    3
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    3
    down vote



    accepted






    I would say that $x:h(x)ne0$ is an open set in $Bbb R$. (Since it is
    the inverse image of the open set $Bbb Rsetminus0$ under the continuous
    function $h$). Each nonempty open set contains a nonempty open interval,
    which has positive Lebesgue measure. So if $h$ is continuous, and not identically
    zero, then it cannot be almost everywhere zero (w.r.t. Lebesgue measure).






    share|cite|improve this answer












    I would say that $x:h(x)ne0$ is an open set in $Bbb R$. (Since it is
    the inverse image of the open set $Bbb Rsetminus0$ under the continuous
    function $h$). Each nonempty open set contains a nonempty open interval,
    which has positive Lebesgue measure. So if $h$ is continuous, and not identically
    zero, then it cannot be almost everywhere zero (w.r.t. Lebesgue measure).







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Aug 25 at 3:17









    Lord Shark the Unknown

    88.2k955115




    88.2k955115











    • Hey, I appreciate the critique, that's the kind of thing that could be helpful for another problem!
      – Drew Brady
      Aug 25 at 3:26
















    • Hey, I appreciate the critique, that's the kind of thing that could be helpful for another problem!
      – Drew Brady
      Aug 25 at 3:26















    Hey, I appreciate the critique, that's the kind of thing that could be helpful for another problem!
    – Drew Brady
    Aug 25 at 3:26




    Hey, I appreciate the critique, that's the kind of thing that could be helpful for another problem!
    – Drew Brady
    Aug 25 at 3:26










    up vote
    -1
    down vote













    (For completeness, following Lord Shark the Unknown's advice.)



    Let $h: mathbbR to mathbbR$ be a continuous function. Suppose that $h neq 0$. Thus, the set $h neq 0$ is nonempty and open, and hence has positive Lebesgue measure. Taking the contrapositive, if $h$ is a continuous real-valued function on $mathbbR$, then $lambdah neq 0 = 0$ implies $h = 0$ (everywhere). Now take $h = f - g$. The result follows.






    share|cite|improve this answer
























      up vote
      -1
      down vote













      (For completeness, following Lord Shark the Unknown's advice.)



      Let $h: mathbbR to mathbbR$ be a continuous function. Suppose that $h neq 0$. Thus, the set $h neq 0$ is nonempty and open, and hence has positive Lebesgue measure. Taking the contrapositive, if $h$ is a continuous real-valued function on $mathbbR$, then $lambdah neq 0 = 0$ implies $h = 0$ (everywhere). Now take $h = f - g$. The result follows.






      share|cite|improve this answer






















        up vote
        -1
        down vote










        up vote
        -1
        down vote









        (For completeness, following Lord Shark the Unknown's advice.)



        Let $h: mathbbR to mathbbR$ be a continuous function. Suppose that $h neq 0$. Thus, the set $h neq 0$ is nonempty and open, and hence has positive Lebesgue measure. Taking the contrapositive, if $h$ is a continuous real-valued function on $mathbbR$, then $lambdah neq 0 = 0$ implies $h = 0$ (everywhere). Now take $h = f - g$. The result follows.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        (For completeness, following Lord Shark the Unknown's advice.)



        Let $h: mathbbR to mathbbR$ be a continuous function. Suppose that $h neq 0$. Thus, the set $h neq 0$ is nonempty and open, and hence has positive Lebesgue measure. Taking the contrapositive, if $h$ is a continuous real-valued function on $mathbbR$, then $lambdah neq 0 = 0$ implies $h = 0$ (everywhere). Now take $h = f - g$. The result follows.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Aug 25 at 3:30









        Drew Brady

        523214




        523214



























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2893751%2fcheck-this-measure-theory-argument%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            這個網誌中的熱門文章

            tkz-euclide: tkzDrawCircle[R] not working

            How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

            1st Magritte Awards