Check this measure theory argument

Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Here's a problem from Cohn's Measure Theory.
[Cohn, 2.1.3] Let $f$ and $g$ be continuous real-valued functions on $mathbbR$. Show that if $f =g$ for $lambda$-almost every $x$, then $f = g$ everywhere.
Here $lambda$ denotes Lebesgue measure.
Here's what I do.
Let $h: mathbbR to mathbbR$ be a continuous function. Suppose that $h neq 0$. Then for some $x in mathbbR$, there is $n in mathbbN$ such that $|h(x)| > 2/n$. Then by continuity for some $delta > 0$, we may ensure that whenever $|y - x| < delta/2$, we have
$$
|h(y)| geq |h(x)| - |h(y) - h(x)| > 2/n - 1/n = 1/n.
$$
Hence, $lambda(h neq 0) geq lambda( > 1/n) geq delta > 0$. Taking the contrapositive, we just showed if $h$ is a continuous real-valued function on $mathbbR$, then
$lambdah neq 0 = 0$ implies $h = 0$ (everywhere). The result follows now by setting $h = f - g$, which is continuous.
Question. Is this basically the simplest way to do it? Other ways?
measure-theory proof-verification
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Here's a problem from Cohn's Measure Theory.
[Cohn, 2.1.3] Let $f$ and $g$ be continuous real-valued functions on $mathbbR$. Show that if $f =g$ for $lambda$-almost every $x$, then $f = g$ everywhere.
Here $lambda$ denotes Lebesgue measure.
Here's what I do.
Let $h: mathbbR to mathbbR$ be a continuous function. Suppose that $h neq 0$. Then for some $x in mathbbR$, there is $n in mathbbN$ such that $|h(x)| > 2/n$. Then by continuity for some $delta > 0$, we may ensure that whenever $|y - x| < delta/2$, we have
$$
|h(y)| geq |h(x)| - |h(y) - h(x)| > 2/n - 1/n = 1/n.
$$
Hence, $lambda(h neq 0) geq lambda( > 1/n) geq delta > 0$. Taking the contrapositive, we just showed if $h$ is a continuous real-valued function on $mathbbR$, then
$lambdah neq 0 = 0$ implies $h = 0$ (everywhere). The result follows now by setting $h = f - g$, which is continuous.
Question. Is this basically the simplest way to do it? Other ways?
measure-theory proof-verification
That's basically sound, but you could be more concise.
â Lord Shark the Unknown
Aug 25 at 3:17
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Here's a problem from Cohn's Measure Theory.
[Cohn, 2.1.3] Let $f$ and $g$ be continuous real-valued functions on $mathbbR$. Show that if $f =g$ for $lambda$-almost every $x$, then $f = g$ everywhere.
Here $lambda$ denotes Lebesgue measure.
Here's what I do.
Let $h: mathbbR to mathbbR$ be a continuous function. Suppose that $h neq 0$. Then for some $x in mathbbR$, there is $n in mathbbN$ such that $|h(x)| > 2/n$. Then by continuity for some $delta > 0$, we may ensure that whenever $|y - x| < delta/2$, we have
$$
|h(y)| geq |h(x)| - |h(y) - h(x)| > 2/n - 1/n = 1/n.
$$
Hence, $lambda(h neq 0) geq lambda( > 1/n) geq delta > 0$. Taking the contrapositive, we just showed if $h$ is a continuous real-valued function on $mathbbR$, then
$lambdah neq 0 = 0$ implies $h = 0$ (everywhere). The result follows now by setting $h = f - g$, which is continuous.
Question. Is this basically the simplest way to do it? Other ways?
measure-theory proof-verification
Here's a problem from Cohn's Measure Theory.
[Cohn, 2.1.3] Let $f$ and $g$ be continuous real-valued functions on $mathbbR$. Show that if $f =g$ for $lambda$-almost every $x$, then $f = g$ everywhere.
Here $lambda$ denotes Lebesgue measure.
Here's what I do.
Let $h: mathbbR to mathbbR$ be a continuous function. Suppose that $h neq 0$. Then for some $x in mathbbR$, there is $n in mathbbN$ such that $|h(x)| > 2/n$. Then by continuity for some $delta > 0$, we may ensure that whenever $|y - x| < delta/2$, we have
$$
|h(y)| geq |h(x)| - |h(y) - h(x)| > 2/n - 1/n = 1/n.
$$
Hence, $lambda(h neq 0) geq lambda( > 1/n) geq delta > 0$. Taking the contrapositive, we just showed if $h$ is a continuous real-valued function on $mathbbR$, then
$lambdah neq 0 = 0$ implies $h = 0$ (everywhere). The result follows now by setting $h = f - g$, which is continuous.
Question. Is this basically the simplest way to do it? Other ways?
measure-theory proof-verification
edited Aug 25 at 2:31
asked Aug 25 at 2:18
Drew Brady
523214
523214
That's basically sound, but you could be more concise.
â Lord Shark the Unknown
Aug 25 at 3:17
add a comment |Â
That's basically sound, but you could be more concise.
â Lord Shark the Unknown
Aug 25 at 3:17
That's basically sound, but you could be more concise.
â Lord Shark the Unknown
Aug 25 at 3:17
That's basically sound, but you could be more concise.
â Lord Shark the Unknown
Aug 25 at 3:17
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
I would say that $x:h(x)ne0$ is an open set in $Bbb R$. (Since it is
the inverse image of the open set $Bbb Rsetminus0$ under the continuous
function $h$). Each nonempty open set contains a nonempty open interval,
which has positive Lebesgue measure. So if $h$ is continuous, and not identically
zero, then it cannot be almost everywhere zero (w.r.t. Lebesgue measure).
Hey, I appreciate the critique, that's the kind of thing that could be helpful for another problem!
â Drew Brady
Aug 25 at 3:26
add a comment |Â
up vote
-1
down vote
(For completeness, following Lord Shark the Unknown's advice.)
Let $h: mathbbR to mathbbR$ be a continuous function. Suppose that $h neq 0$. Thus, the set $h neq 0$ is nonempty and open, and hence has positive Lebesgue measure. Taking the contrapositive, if $h$ is a continuous real-valued function on $mathbbR$, then $lambdah neq 0 = 0$ implies $h = 0$ (everywhere). Now take $h = f - g$. The result follows.
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
I would say that $x:h(x)ne0$ is an open set in $Bbb R$. (Since it is
the inverse image of the open set $Bbb Rsetminus0$ under the continuous
function $h$). Each nonempty open set contains a nonempty open interval,
which has positive Lebesgue measure. So if $h$ is continuous, and not identically
zero, then it cannot be almost everywhere zero (w.r.t. Lebesgue measure).
Hey, I appreciate the critique, that's the kind of thing that could be helpful for another problem!
â Drew Brady
Aug 25 at 3:26
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
I would say that $x:h(x)ne0$ is an open set in $Bbb R$. (Since it is
the inverse image of the open set $Bbb Rsetminus0$ under the continuous
function $h$). Each nonempty open set contains a nonempty open interval,
which has positive Lebesgue measure. So if $h$ is continuous, and not identically
zero, then it cannot be almost everywhere zero (w.r.t. Lebesgue measure).
Hey, I appreciate the critique, that's the kind of thing that could be helpful for another problem!
â Drew Brady
Aug 25 at 3:26
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
I would say that $x:h(x)ne0$ is an open set in $Bbb R$. (Since it is
the inverse image of the open set $Bbb Rsetminus0$ under the continuous
function $h$). Each nonempty open set contains a nonempty open interval,
which has positive Lebesgue measure. So if $h$ is continuous, and not identically
zero, then it cannot be almost everywhere zero (w.r.t. Lebesgue measure).
I would say that $x:h(x)ne0$ is an open set in $Bbb R$. (Since it is
the inverse image of the open set $Bbb Rsetminus0$ under the continuous
function $h$). Each nonempty open set contains a nonempty open interval,
which has positive Lebesgue measure. So if $h$ is continuous, and not identically
zero, then it cannot be almost everywhere zero (w.r.t. Lebesgue measure).
answered Aug 25 at 3:17
Lord Shark the Unknown
88.2k955115
88.2k955115
Hey, I appreciate the critique, that's the kind of thing that could be helpful for another problem!
â Drew Brady
Aug 25 at 3:26
add a comment |Â
Hey, I appreciate the critique, that's the kind of thing that could be helpful for another problem!
â Drew Brady
Aug 25 at 3:26
Hey, I appreciate the critique, that's the kind of thing that could be helpful for another problem!
â Drew Brady
Aug 25 at 3:26
Hey, I appreciate the critique, that's the kind of thing that could be helpful for another problem!
â Drew Brady
Aug 25 at 3:26
add a comment |Â
up vote
-1
down vote
(For completeness, following Lord Shark the Unknown's advice.)
Let $h: mathbbR to mathbbR$ be a continuous function. Suppose that $h neq 0$. Thus, the set $h neq 0$ is nonempty and open, and hence has positive Lebesgue measure. Taking the contrapositive, if $h$ is a continuous real-valued function on $mathbbR$, then $lambdah neq 0 = 0$ implies $h = 0$ (everywhere). Now take $h = f - g$. The result follows.
add a comment |Â
up vote
-1
down vote
(For completeness, following Lord Shark the Unknown's advice.)
Let $h: mathbbR to mathbbR$ be a continuous function. Suppose that $h neq 0$. Thus, the set $h neq 0$ is nonempty and open, and hence has positive Lebesgue measure. Taking the contrapositive, if $h$ is a continuous real-valued function on $mathbbR$, then $lambdah neq 0 = 0$ implies $h = 0$ (everywhere). Now take $h = f - g$. The result follows.
add a comment |Â
up vote
-1
down vote
up vote
-1
down vote
(For completeness, following Lord Shark the Unknown's advice.)
Let $h: mathbbR to mathbbR$ be a continuous function. Suppose that $h neq 0$. Thus, the set $h neq 0$ is nonempty and open, and hence has positive Lebesgue measure. Taking the contrapositive, if $h$ is a continuous real-valued function on $mathbbR$, then $lambdah neq 0 = 0$ implies $h = 0$ (everywhere). Now take $h = f - g$. The result follows.
(For completeness, following Lord Shark the Unknown's advice.)
Let $h: mathbbR to mathbbR$ be a continuous function. Suppose that $h neq 0$. Thus, the set $h neq 0$ is nonempty and open, and hence has positive Lebesgue measure. Taking the contrapositive, if $h$ is a continuous real-valued function on $mathbbR$, then $lambdah neq 0 = 0$ implies $h = 0$ (everywhere). Now take $h = f - g$. The result follows.
answered Aug 25 at 3:30
Drew Brady
523214
523214
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2893751%2fcheck-this-measure-theory-argument%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
That's basically sound, but you could be more concise.
â Lord Shark the Unknown
Aug 25 at 3:17