Continuously Differentiably Unitarily Diagonalizing $B + tC$, for $B$, $C$ Hermitian.

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Let $B$ and $C$ be self-adjoint (complex) $ntimes n$ matrices. I was wondering if there is an expansion: $B + tC = U_t^ast Lambda(t) U_t$, a continuously differentiable unitary diagonalization, where $Lambda(t)$ and $U_t$ are continuously differentiable, where $Lambda(t)$ is diagonal and $U_t$ is unitary. See (1) below for why I care about this.



I looked at a few StackExchange/Math Overflow posts on this subject. E.g.



Continuously changing Null Space



Do eigenvalues/vectors change continuously?



how to find/define eigenvectors as a continuous function of matrix?



Conditions for smooth dependence of the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a matrix on a set of parameters



I also tried reading up on some articles on this, but mainly they discussed matrices with elements in $C(X)$, the continuous (real? complex?) functions on a topological space $X$, but I did not get far with getting an application in this case.



Note especially the last reference. The question that I have is that my example is very simple, analytic since it is linear, but it is not symmetric which the last reference says that a result in Kato's Perturbation Theory of Linear Operators says that it works, but self-adjoint (i.e. Hermitian). I also was not able to reduce the Hermitian case to the symmetric case by applying that result to $B + tC + overlineB+tC$ and $B + tC - overlineB+tC$, but $B$ and $C$ might not commute so I don't know if it can extend in this way.



I was wondering what the result would be in this case and if anyone has the relevant reference/theorem statement for the question that I am wondering.



Thank you very much.



(1): See Perturbation Theory: Derivative of a trace. for context, but a particular trace forumula follows using the property of the trace $operatornameTr[PQ] = operatornameTr[QP]$, $U_t^ast U_t = 1$ (and so that $(U_0')^ast U_0 + U_0^ast U_0' = 0$), $B = U_0Lambda(0)U_0$, and $C = fracddt|_t=0(B + tC) = fracddt|_t=0(U_t^ast Lambda(t) U_t)$. The desired result follows after a little calculation.







share|cite|improve this question




















  • Kato uses "symmetric" to mean Hermitian symmetric.
    – Keith McClary
    Aug 22 at 4:21










  • Really? That is nice to hear. Thank you.
    – 4-ier
    Aug 22 at 4:35














up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Let $B$ and $C$ be self-adjoint (complex) $ntimes n$ matrices. I was wondering if there is an expansion: $B + tC = U_t^ast Lambda(t) U_t$, a continuously differentiable unitary diagonalization, where $Lambda(t)$ and $U_t$ are continuously differentiable, where $Lambda(t)$ is diagonal and $U_t$ is unitary. See (1) below for why I care about this.



I looked at a few StackExchange/Math Overflow posts on this subject. E.g.



Continuously changing Null Space



Do eigenvalues/vectors change continuously?



how to find/define eigenvectors as a continuous function of matrix?



Conditions for smooth dependence of the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a matrix on a set of parameters



I also tried reading up on some articles on this, but mainly they discussed matrices with elements in $C(X)$, the continuous (real? complex?) functions on a topological space $X$, but I did not get far with getting an application in this case.



Note especially the last reference. The question that I have is that my example is very simple, analytic since it is linear, but it is not symmetric which the last reference says that a result in Kato's Perturbation Theory of Linear Operators says that it works, but self-adjoint (i.e. Hermitian). I also was not able to reduce the Hermitian case to the symmetric case by applying that result to $B + tC + overlineB+tC$ and $B + tC - overlineB+tC$, but $B$ and $C$ might not commute so I don't know if it can extend in this way.



I was wondering what the result would be in this case and if anyone has the relevant reference/theorem statement for the question that I am wondering.



Thank you very much.



(1): See Perturbation Theory: Derivative of a trace. for context, but a particular trace forumula follows using the property of the trace $operatornameTr[PQ] = operatornameTr[QP]$, $U_t^ast U_t = 1$ (and so that $(U_0')^ast U_0 + U_0^ast U_0' = 0$), $B = U_0Lambda(0)U_0$, and $C = fracddt|_t=0(B + tC) = fracddt|_t=0(U_t^ast Lambda(t) U_t)$. The desired result follows after a little calculation.







share|cite|improve this question




















  • Kato uses "symmetric" to mean Hermitian symmetric.
    – Keith McClary
    Aug 22 at 4:21










  • Really? That is nice to hear. Thank you.
    – 4-ier
    Aug 22 at 4:35












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











Let $B$ and $C$ be self-adjoint (complex) $ntimes n$ matrices. I was wondering if there is an expansion: $B + tC = U_t^ast Lambda(t) U_t$, a continuously differentiable unitary diagonalization, where $Lambda(t)$ and $U_t$ are continuously differentiable, where $Lambda(t)$ is diagonal and $U_t$ is unitary. See (1) below for why I care about this.



I looked at a few StackExchange/Math Overflow posts on this subject. E.g.



Continuously changing Null Space



Do eigenvalues/vectors change continuously?



how to find/define eigenvectors as a continuous function of matrix?



Conditions for smooth dependence of the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a matrix on a set of parameters



I also tried reading up on some articles on this, but mainly they discussed matrices with elements in $C(X)$, the continuous (real? complex?) functions on a topological space $X$, but I did not get far with getting an application in this case.



Note especially the last reference. The question that I have is that my example is very simple, analytic since it is linear, but it is not symmetric which the last reference says that a result in Kato's Perturbation Theory of Linear Operators says that it works, but self-adjoint (i.e. Hermitian). I also was not able to reduce the Hermitian case to the symmetric case by applying that result to $B + tC + overlineB+tC$ and $B + tC - overlineB+tC$, but $B$ and $C$ might not commute so I don't know if it can extend in this way.



I was wondering what the result would be in this case and if anyone has the relevant reference/theorem statement for the question that I am wondering.



Thank you very much.



(1): See Perturbation Theory: Derivative of a trace. for context, but a particular trace forumula follows using the property of the trace $operatornameTr[PQ] = operatornameTr[QP]$, $U_t^ast U_t = 1$ (and so that $(U_0')^ast U_0 + U_0^ast U_0' = 0$), $B = U_0Lambda(0)U_0$, and $C = fracddt|_t=0(B + tC) = fracddt|_t=0(U_t^ast Lambda(t) U_t)$. The desired result follows after a little calculation.







share|cite|improve this question












Let $B$ and $C$ be self-adjoint (complex) $ntimes n$ matrices. I was wondering if there is an expansion: $B + tC = U_t^ast Lambda(t) U_t$, a continuously differentiable unitary diagonalization, where $Lambda(t)$ and $U_t$ are continuously differentiable, where $Lambda(t)$ is diagonal and $U_t$ is unitary. See (1) below for why I care about this.



I looked at a few StackExchange/Math Overflow posts on this subject. E.g.



Continuously changing Null Space



Do eigenvalues/vectors change continuously?



how to find/define eigenvectors as a continuous function of matrix?



Conditions for smooth dependence of the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a matrix on a set of parameters



I also tried reading up on some articles on this, but mainly they discussed matrices with elements in $C(X)$, the continuous (real? complex?) functions on a topological space $X$, but I did not get far with getting an application in this case.



Note especially the last reference. The question that I have is that my example is very simple, analytic since it is linear, but it is not symmetric which the last reference says that a result in Kato's Perturbation Theory of Linear Operators says that it works, but self-adjoint (i.e. Hermitian). I also was not able to reduce the Hermitian case to the symmetric case by applying that result to $B + tC + overlineB+tC$ and $B + tC - overlineB+tC$, but $B$ and $C$ might not commute so I don't know if it can extend in this way.



I was wondering what the result would be in this case and if anyone has the relevant reference/theorem statement for the question that I am wondering.



Thank you very much.



(1): See Perturbation Theory: Derivative of a trace. for context, but a particular trace forumula follows using the property of the trace $operatornameTr[PQ] = operatornameTr[QP]$, $U_t^ast U_t = 1$ (and so that $(U_0')^ast U_0 + U_0^ast U_0' = 0$), $B = U_0Lambda(0)U_0$, and $C = fracddt|_t=0(B + tC) = fracddt|_t=0(U_t^ast Lambda(t) U_t)$. The desired result follows after a little calculation.









share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Aug 22 at 3:31









4-ier

5989




5989











  • Kato uses "symmetric" to mean Hermitian symmetric.
    – Keith McClary
    Aug 22 at 4:21










  • Really? That is nice to hear. Thank you.
    – 4-ier
    Aug 22 at 4:35
















  • Kato uses "symmetric" to mean Hermitian symmetric.
    – Keith McClary
    Aug 22 at 4:21










  • Really? That is nice to hear. Thank you.
    – 4-ier
    Aug 22 at 4:35















Kato uses "symmetric" to mean Hermitian symmetric.
– Keith McClary
Aug 22 at 4:21




Kato uses "symmetric" to mean Hermitian symmetric.
– Keith McClary
Aug 22 at 4:21












Really? That is nice to hear. Thank you.
– 4-ier
Aug 22 at 4:35




Really? That is nice to hear. Thank you.
– 4-ier
Aug 22 at 4:35















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2890595%2fcontinuously-differentiably-unitarily-diagonalizing-b-tc-for-b-c-hermi%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes










 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2890595%2fcontinuously-differentiably-unitarily-diagonalizing-b-tc-for-b-c-hermi%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

tkz-euclide: tkzDrawCircle[R] not working

How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

1st Magritte Awards