Verification of Solution for Walter Rudin Principles of Mathematical Analysis Exercise 20, Chapter 3
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I have written an answer for the problem 20, chapter 3 of Walter Rudin's Principle of Mathematical Analysis. I think the proof is correct, but since I am new with this kind of proofs, I am skeptical about the subtle points. So it would be really helpful to me if someone can comment on my proof, and maybe give some hints if some error is found. Any help is appreciated. Here is my proof along with the original question and hint:
Exercise 22: Suppose $X$ is a nonempty complete metric space, and $G_n_nge 1$ be a sequence of open dense subsets of $X$. Prove Baire's theorem, namely, that $ bigcap_n=1^inftyG_n$ is nonempty. (In fact, it is dense in $X$). Hint: Find a shrinking sequence of neighborhoods $E_n$, such that $overlineE_nsubset G_n$ and then apply exercise $21$.
Exercise $21$ asks to prove that it $E_n$ is a decreasing sequence of closed , nonempty and bounded sets in a complete metric space with $lim_nto inftymboxdiam E_n=0$, then $bigcap_1^infty E_n$ contains exactly one point.
I have proven exercise 21 and I know that that proof is okay. So, I will show here how I constructed the sequence of $E_n$ for exercise $22$. Also I have tried to prove that $bigcap_1^infty G_n$ is in fact dense in $X$.
Let $xin X$. Let $B_epsilon(x)$ be an open ball around $x$.
Claim 1: $forall n$, $B_epsilon(x)cap G_nne emptyset$
Proof: If $exists n$ such that $xin G_n$ then it is obvious. Otherwise, as $G_n$ is dense in $X$, $x$ is a limit point of $G_n$ which implies the result.$blacksquare$
Now, since each $G_n$ is open and so is $B_epsilon(x)$, $B_epsilon(x)cap G_n$ is open $forall n$. Now, let $p_1in B_epsilon(x)cap G_n$. Then, $exists delta>0$ such that $B_delta(p_1)subset B_epsilon(x)cap G_1$. Choose $0<delta_1<delta$ and set $E_1=B_delta_1(p_1)$.
Claim 2: $overlineE_1subset B_delta(p_1)$
Proof: Clearly, $E_1subset B_delta(p_1)$. Now, let $q$ be a limit point of $E_1$. Then, $forall epsilon'>0, exists p'in E_1$ such that $d(p',q)<epsilon'implies forall epsilon'>0, d(p_1,q)le d(p_1,p')+d(p',q)<delta_1+epsilon'implies d(p_1,q)le delta_1<delta$ from which the claim follows.$blacksquare$
Hence it follows that $overlineE_1subset B_epsilon(x)cap G_1$.
Let us assume that we have constructed $E_k$ such that $E_1supset E_2supsetcdotssupset E_k$ and $overlineE_isubset B_epsilon(x)cap G_i, i=1,2,cdots, k$. Now, $E_kcap G_k+1ne emptyset$ and is open by construction. Let $p_k+1in E_kcap G_k+1$, then, $exists delta'>0$ such that $B_delta'(p_k+1)subset E_kcap G_k+1$. Then, choose $0<delta_k+1<delta'$ and set $E_k+1=B_delta_k+1(p_k+1)subset E_kcap G_k+1subset B_epsilon(x)cap G_k+1$, so that $overlineE_k+1subset B_epsilon(x)cap G_k+1$. Then, from the Exercise $21$ of the book, it follows that $bigcap_1^inftyG_n$ is dense in $X$.$blacksquare$
real-analysis sequences-and-series proof-verification proof-writing
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I have written an answer for the problem 20, chapter 3 of Walter Rudin's Principle of Mathematical Analysis. I think the proof is correct, but since I am new with this kind of proofs, I am skeptical about the subtle points. So it would be really helpful to me if someone can comment on my proof, and maybe give some hints if some error is found. Any help is appreciated. Here is my proof along with the original question and hint:
Exercise 22: Suppose $X$ is a nonempty complete metric space, and $G_n_nge 1$ be a sequence of open dense subsets of $X$. Prove Baire's theorem, namely, that $ bigcap_n=1^inftyG_n$ is nonempty. (In fact, it is dense in $X$). Hint: Find a shrinking sequence of neighborhoods $E_n$, such that $overlineE_nsubset G_n$ and then apply exercise $21$.
Exercise $21$ asks to prove that it $E_n$ is a decreasing sequence of closed , nonempty and bounded sets in a complete metric space with $lim_nto inftymboxdiam E_n=0$, then $bigcap_1^infty E_n$ contains exactly one point.
I have proven exercise 21 and I know that that proof is okay. So, I will show here how I constructed the sequence of $E_n$ for exercise $22$. Also I have tried to prove that $bigcap_1^infty G_n$ is in fact dense in $X$.
Let $xin X$. Let $B_epsilon(x)$ be an open ball around $x$.
Claim 1: $forall n$, $B_epsilon(x)cap G_nne emptyset$
Proof: If $exists n$ such that $xin G_n$ then it is obvious. Otherwise, as $G_n$ is dense in $X$, $x$ is a limit point of $G_n$ which implies the result.$blacksquare$
Now, since each $G_n$ is open and so is $B_epsilon(x)$, $B_epsilon(x)cap G_n$ is open $forall n$. Now, let $p_1in B_epsilon(x)cap G_n$. Then, $exists delta>0$ such that $B_delta(p_1)subset B_epsilon(x)cap G_1$. Choose $0<delta_1<delta$ and set $E_1=B_delta_1(p_1)$.
Claim 2: $overlineE_1subset B_delta(p_1)$
Proof: Clearly, $E_1subset B_delta(p_1)$. Now, let $q$ be a limit point of $E_1$. Then, $forall epsilon'>0, exists p'in E_1$ such that $d(p',q)<epsilon'implies forall epsilon'>0, d(p_1,q)le d(p_1,p')+d(p',q)<delta_1+epsilon'implies d(p_1,q)le delta_1<delta$ from which the claim follows.$blacksquare$
Hence it follows that $overlineE_1subset B_epsilon(x)cap G_1$.
Let us assume that we have constructed $E_k$ such that $E_1supset E_2supsetcdotssupset E_k$ and $overlineE_isubset B_epsilon(x)cap G_i, i=1,2,cdots, k$. Now, $E_kcap G_k+1ne emptyset$ and is open by construction. Let $p_k+1in E_kcap G_k+1$, then, $exists delta'>0$ such that $B_delta'(p_k+1)subset E_kcap G_k+1$. Then, choose $0<delta_k+1<delta'$ and set $E_k+1=B_delta_k+1(p_k+1)subset E_kcap G_k+1subset B_epsilon(x)cap G_k+1$, so that $overlineE_k+1subset B_epsilon(x)cap G_k+1$. Then, from the Exercise $21$ of the book, it follows that $bigcap_1^inftyG_n$ is dense in $X$.$blacksquare$
real-analysis sequences-and-series proof-verification proof-writing
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I have written an answer for the problem 20, chapter 3 of Walter Rudin's Principle of Mathematical Analysis. I think the proof is correct, but since I am new with this kind of proofs, I am skeptical about the subtle points. So it would be really helpful to me if someone can comment on my proof, and maybe give some hints if some error is found. Any help is appreciated. Here is my proof along with the original question and hint:
Exercise 22: Suppose $X$ is a nonempty complete metric space, and $G_n_nge 1$ be a sequence of open dense subsets of $X$. Prove Baire's theorem, namely, that $ bigcap_n=1^inftyG_n$ is nonempty. (In fact, it is dense in $X$). Hint: Find a shrinking sequence of neighborhoods $E_n$, such that $overlineE_nsubset G_n$ and then apply exercise $21$.
Exercise $21$ asks to prove that it $E_n$ is a decreasing sequence of closed , nonempty and bounded sets in a complete metric space with $lim_nto inftymboxdiam E_n=0$, then $bigcap_1^infty E_n$ contains exactly one point.
I have proven exercise 21 and I know that that proof is okay. So, I will show here how I constructed the sequence of $E_n$ for exercise $22$. Also I have tried to prove that $bigcap_1^infty G_n$ is in fact dense in $X$.
Let $xin X$. Let $B_epsilon(x)$ be an open ball around $x$.
Claim 1: $forall n$, $B_epsilon(x)cap G_nne emptyset$
Proof: If $exists n$ such that $xin G_n$ then it is obvious. Otherwise, as $G_n$ is dense in $X$, $x$ is a limit point of $G_n$ which implies the result.$blacksquare$
Now, since each $G_n$ is open and so is $B_epsilon(x)$, $B_epsilon(x)cap G_n$ is open $forall n$. Now, let $p_1in B_epsilon(x)cap G_n$. Then, $exists delta>0$ such that $B_delta(p_1)subset B_epsilon(x)cap G_1$. Choose $0<delta_1<delta$ and set $E_1=B_delta_1(p_1)$.
Claim 2: $overlineE_1subset B_delta(p_1)$
Proof: Clearly, $E_1subset B_delta(p_1)$. Now, let $q$ be a limit point of $E_1$. Then, $forall epsilon'>0, exists p'in E_1$ such that $d(p',q)<epsilon'implies forall epsilon'>0, d(p_1,q)le d(p_1,p')+d(p',q)<delta_1+epsilon'implies d(p_1,q)le delta_1<delta$ from which the claim follows.$blacksquare$
Hence it follows that $overlineE_1subset B_epsilon(x)cap G_1$.
Let us assume that we have constructed $E_k$ such that $E_1supset E_2supsetcdotssupset E_k$ and $overlineE_isubset B_epsilon(x)cap G_i, i=1,2,cdots, k$. Now, $E_kcap G_k+1ne emptyset$ and is open by construction. Let $p_k+1in E_kcap G_k+1$, then, $exists delta'>0$ such that $B_delta'(p_k+1)subset E_kcap G_k+1$. Then, choose $0<delta_k+1<delta'$ and set $E_k+1=B_delta_k+1(p_k+1)subset E_kcap G_k+1subset B_epsilon(x)cap G_k+1$, so that $overlineE_k+1subset B_epsilon(x)cap G_k+1$. Then, from the Exercise $21$ of the book, it follows that $bigcap_1^inftyG_n$ is dense in $X$.$blacksquare$
real-analysis sequences-and-series proof-verification proof-writing
I have written an answer for the problem 20, chapter 3 of Walter Rudin's Principle of Mathematical Analysis. I think the proof is correct, but since I am new with this kind of proofs, I am skeptical about the subtle points. So it would be really helpful to me if someone can comment on my proof, and maybe give some hints if some error is found. Any help is appreciated. Here is my proof along with the original question and hint:
Exercise 22: Suppose $X$ is a nonempty complete metric space, and $G_n_nge 1$ be a sequence of open dense subsets of $X$. Prove Baire's theorem, namely, that $ bigcap_n=1^inftyG_n$ is nonempty. (In fact, it is dense in $X$). Hint: Find a shrinking sequence of neighborhoods $E_n$, such that $overlineE_nsubset G_n$ and then apply exercise $21$.
Exercise $21$ asks to prove that it $E_n$ is a decreasing sequence of closed , nonempty and bounded sets in a complete metric space with $lim_nto inftymboxdiam E_n=0$, then $bigcap_1^infty E_n$ contains exactly one point.
I have proven exercise 21 and I know that that proof is okay. So, I will show here how I constructed the sequence of $E_n$ for exercise $22$. Also I have tried to prove that $bigcap_1^infty G_n$ is in fact dense in $X$.
Let $xin X$. Let $B_epsilon(x)$ be an open ball around $x$.
Claim 1: $forall n$, $B_epsilon(x)cap G_nne emptyset$
Proof: If $exists n$ such that $xin G_n$ then it is obvious. Otherwise, as $G_n$ is dense in $X$, $x$ is a limit point of $G_n$ which implies the result.$blacksquare$
Now, since each $G_n$ is open and so is $B_epsilon(x)$, $B_epsilon(x)cap G_n$ is open $forall n$. Now, let $p_1in B_epsilon(x)cap G_n$. Then, $exists delta>0$ such that $B_delta(p_1)subset B_epsilon(x)cap G_1$. Choose $0<delta_1<delta$ and set $E_1=B_delta_1(p_1)$.
Claim 2: $overlineE_1subset B_delta(p_1)$
Proof: Clearly, $E_1subset B_delta(p_1)$. Now, let $q$ be a limit point of $E_1$. Then, $forall epsilon'>0, exists p'in E_1$ such that $d(p',q)<epsilon'implies forall epsilon'>0, d(p_1,q)le d(p_1,p')+d(p',q)<delta_1+epsilon'implies d(p_1,q)le delta_1<delta$ from which the claim follows.$blacksquare$
Hence it follows that $overlineE_1subset B_epsilon(x)cap G_1$.
Let us assume that we have constructed $E_k$ such that $E_1supset E_2supsetcdotssupset E_k$ and $overlineE_isubset B_epsilon(x)cap G_i, i=1,2,cdots, k$. Now, $E_kcap G_k+1ne emptyset$ and is open by construction. Let $p_k+1in E_kcap G_k+1$, then, $exists delta'>0$ such that $B_delta'(p_k+1)subset E_kcap G_k+1$. Then, choose $0<delta_k+1<delta'$ and set $E_k+1=B_delta_k+1(p_k+1)subset E_kcap G_k+1subset B_epsilon(x)cap G_k+1$, so that $overlineE_k+1subset B_epsilon(x)cap G_k+1$. Then, from the Exercise $21$ of the book, it follows that $bigcap_1^inftyG_n$ is dense in $X$.$blacksquare$
real-analysis sequences-and-series proof-verification proof-writing
edited May 5 '15 at 9:39
asked May 5 '15 at 9:29
Samrat Mukhopadhyay
13.5k1946
13.5k1946
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Your proof is correct.
I would perhaps make the conclusion a bit more explicit. You skip a few steps. They are simple, but an inexperienced reader might be confused. For example, Exercise 21 shows that there exists some point $yin bigcap overline E_k$, so there exists some point $yin bigcap G_n$ such that $yin B_epsilon(x)$. Because $epsilon$ is arbitrary, every open ball around $x$ contains a point of the intersection $bigcap G_n$. Since $x$ is arbitrary, this shows $bigcap G_n$ is dense.
First of all, thank you for reading through the proof. @Potato, I skipped the last steps, because I knew they were correct, I mean they would follow from the assertion of exercise 21, but I was somehow skeptical about the construction of the $E_n$ sequence, since so many things were going on there. Now your answer has settled my mind, thanks again :)
â Samrat Mukhopadhyay
May 5 '15 at 10:02
@SamratMukhopadhyay You're welcome. Good luck with your studies!
â Potato
May 5 '15 at 10:04
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Your proof is correct.
I would perhaps make the conclusion a bit more explicit. You skip a few steps. They are simple, but an inexperienced reader might be confused. For example, Exercise 21 shows that there exists some point $yin bigcap overline E_k$, so there exists some point $yin bigcap G_n$ such that $yin B_epsilon(x)$. Because $epsilon$ is arbitrary, every open ball around $x$ contains a point of the intersection $bigcap G_n$. Since $x$ is arbitrary, this shows $bigcap G_n$ is dense.
First of all, thank you for reading through the proof. @Potato, I skipped the last steps, because I knew they were correct, I mean they would follow from the assertion of exercise 21, but I was somehow skeptical about the construction of the $E_n$ sequence, since so many things were going on there. Now your answer has settled my mind, thanks again :)
â Samrat Mukhopadhyay
May 5 '15 at 10:02
@SamratMukhopadhyay You're welcome. Good luck with your studies!
â Potato
May 5 '15 at 10:04
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Your proof is correct.
I would perhaps make the conclusion a bit more explicit. You skip a few steps. They are simple, but an inexperienced reader might be confused. For example, Exercise 21 shows that there exists some point $yin bigcap overline E_k$, so there exists some point $yin bigcap G_n$ such that $yin B_epsilon(x)$. Because $epsilon$ is arbitrary, every open ball around $x$ contains a point of the intersection $bigcap G_n$. Since $x$ is arbitrary, this shows $bigcap G_n$ is dense.
First of all, thank you for reading through the proof. @Potato, I skipped the last steps, because I knew they were correct, I mean they would follow from the assertion of exercise 21, but I was somehow skeptical about the construction of the $E_n$ sequence, since so many things were going on there. Now your answer has settled my mind, thanks again :)
â Samrat Mukhopadhyay
May 5 '15 at 10:02
@SamratMukhopadhyay You're welcome. Good luck with your studies!
â Potato
May 5 '15 at 10:04
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Your proof is correct.
I would perhaps make the conclusion a bit more explicit. You skip a few steps. They are simple, but an inexperienced reader might be confused. For example, Exercise 21 shows that there exists some point $yin bigcap overline E_k$, so there exists some point $yin bigcap G_n$ such that $yin B_epsilon(x)$. Because $epsilon$ is arbitrary, every open ball around $x$ contains a point of the intersection $bigcap G_n$. Since $x$ is arbitrary, this shows $bigcap G_n$ is dense.
Your proof is correct.
I would perhaps make the conclusion a bit more explicit. You skip a few steps. They are simple, but an inexperienced reader might be confused. For example, Exercise 21 shows that there exists some point $yin bigcap overline E_k$, so there exists some point $yin bigcap G_n$ such that $yin B_epsilon(x)$. Because $epsilon$ is arbitrary, every open ball around $x$ contains a point of the intersection $bigcap G_n$. Since $x$ is arbitrary, this shows $bigcap G_n$ is dense.
answered May 5 '15 at 9:58
Potato
21k984183
21k984183
First of all, thank you for reading through the proof. @Potato, I skipped the last steps, because I knew they were correct, I mean they would follow from the assertion of exercise 21, but I was somehow skeptical about the construction of the $E_n$ sequence, since so many things were going on there. Now your answer has settled my mind, thanks again :)
â Samrat Mukhopadhyay
May 5 '15 at 10:02
@SamratMukhopadhyay You're welcome. Good luck with your studies!
â Potato
May 5 '15 at 10:04
add a comment |Â
First of all, thank you for reading through the proof. @Potato, I skipped the last steps, because I knew they were correct, I mean they would follow from the assertion of exercise 21, but I was somehow skeptical about the construction of the $E_n$ sequence, since so many things were going on there. Now your answer has settled my mind, thanks again :)
â Samrat Mukhopadhyay
May 5 '15 at 10:02
@SamratMukhopadhyay You're welcome. Good luck with your studies!
â Potato
May 5 '15 at 10:04
First of all, thank you for reading through the proof. @Potato, I skipped the last steps, because I knew they were correct, I mean they would follow from the assertion of exercise 21, but I was somehow skeptical about the construction of the $E_n$ sequence, since so many things were going on there. Now your answer has settled my mind, thanks again :)
â Samrat Mukhopadhyay
May 5 '15 at 10:02
First of all, thank you for reading through the proof. @Potato, I skipped the last steps, because I knew they were correct, I mean they would follow from the assertion of exercise 21, but I was somehow skeptical about the construction of the $E_n$ sequence, since so many things were going on there. Now your answer has settled my mind, thanks again :)
â Samrat Mukhopadhyay
May 5 '15 at 10:02
@SamratMukhopadhyay You're welcome. Good luck with your studies!
â Potato
May 5 '15 at 10:04
@SamratMukhopadhyay You're welcome. Good luck with your studies!
â Potato
May 5 '15 at 10:04
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1267874%2fverification-of-solution-for-walter-rudin-principles-of-mathematical-analysis-ex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password