Name for the trivial extension of a single-variable real function to several variables

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












This is a question about terminology. Is there any common name for the trivial extension of a real function $f colon mathbbR to mathbbR$ to several variables $tildef colon mathbbR^n to mathbbR^n$?



By "trivial extension", I mean defining $tildef$ in terms of $f$ as $tildef(x_1, dots, x_n) = (f(x_1), dots, f(x_n))$.



As a simple example, if we have a trigonometric function like $sin(x)$, we can trivially extend it to $mathbbR^3$ as $sin(x, y, z) = (sin(x), sin(y), sin(z))$. I'm just wondering if there is any accepted name and well-known reference for this simple way of building multivariate functions.







share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    This is a question about terminology. Is there any common name for the trivial extension of a real function $f colon mathbbR to mathbbR$ to several variables $tildef colon mathbbR^n to mathbbR^n$?



    By "trivial extension", I mean defining $tildef$ in terms of $f$ as $tildef(x_1, dots, x_n) = (f(x_1), dots, f(x_n))$.



    As a simple example, if we have a trigonometric function like $sin(x)$, we can trivially extend it to $mathbbR^3$ as $sin(x, y, z) = (sin(x), sin(y), sin(z))$. I'm just wondering if there is any accepted name and well-known reference for this simple way of building multivariate functions.







    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      This is a question about terminology. Is there any common name for the trivial extension of a real function $f colon mathbbR to mathbbR$ to several variables $tildef colon mathbbR^n to mathbbR^n$?



      By "trivial extension", I mean defining $tildef$ in terms of $f$ as $tildef(x_1, dots, x_n) = (f(x_1), dots, f(x_n))$.



      As a simple example, if we have a trigonometric function like $sin(x)$, we can trivially extend it to $mathbbR^3$ as $sin(x, y, z) = (sin(x), sin(y), sin(z))$. I'm just wondering if there is any accepted name and well-known reference for this simple way of building multivariate functions.







      share|cite|improve this question














      This is a question about terminology. Is there any common name for the trivial extension of a real function $f colon mathbbR to mathbbR$ to several variables $tildef colon mathbbR^n to mathbbR^n$?



      By "trivial extension", I mean defining $tildef$ in terms of $f$ as $tildef(x_1, dots, x_n) = (f(x_1), dots, f(x_n))$.



      As a simple example, if we have a trigonometric function like $sin(x)$, we can trivially extend it to $mathbbR^3$ as $sin(x, y, z) = (sin(x), sin(y), sin(z))$. I'm just wondering if there is any accepted name and well-known reference for this simple way of building multivariate functions.









      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Aug 22 at 15:25









      Brahadeesh

      4,13631550




      4,13631550










      asked Aug 22 at 8:24









      Ángel José Riesgo

      253




      253




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          I don't think there is a generally accepted and generally understood term here. You might say $tilde f$ is the $k$-fold tensor product of itself in some space $bigotimes_1^k V$ of multivariate functions, or use some notation like $f^otimes$, but you would also have to explain precisely what you mean to the audience. Which would end up taking more words and notation than simply giving the formula directly.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • Thanks. I've decided to accept this answer (between the two useful ones I received so far), as "tensor product" is probably the closest well-known concept to the idea I had in mind, even though right now I'm dealing with plain n-tuples that don't have a vector space (or algebra or whatever) structure.
            – Ángel José Riesgo
            Aug 31 at 8:33










          • Or you might try "cartesian product", as the graph of your new function is the cartesian product of the graphs of the constituent functions, in a certain sense.
            – kimchi lover
            Aug 31 at 11:59

















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          Mathematica speaks about "threading a function over lists". It is a built in feature for many standard functions: For example, you get



          N[Sin[1,5,-2,4]]
          0.841471, -0.958924, -0.909297, -0.756802


          If you use such a feature for various functions several times in a paper or talk it pays to invent a special notation.



          If $f$ is a given function acting on points $xin X$ you could denote by $tilde f$ (or similar) the induced function on $n$-tuples of points, whereby $n$ can be arbitrary, but finite.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • It is more typical in functional programming to call this mapping a function over a list. In Mathematica as well, you can do Map[Sin, 1, 5, -2, 4].
            – Rahul
            Aug 23 at 10:11











          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2890785%2fname-for-the-trivial-extension-of-a-single-variable-real-function-to-several-var%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          I don't think there is a generally accepted and generally understood term here. You might say $tilde f$ is the $k$-fold tensor product of itself in some space $bigotimes_1^k V$ of multivariate functions, or use some notation like $f^otimes$, but you would also have to explain precisely what you mean to the audience. Which would end up taking more words and notation than simply giving the formula directly.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • Thanks. I've decided to accept this answer (between the two useful ones I received so far), as "tensor product" is probably the closest well-known concept to the idea I had in mind, even though right now I'm dealing with plain n-tuples that don't have a vector space (or algebra or whatever) structure.
            – Ángel José Riesgo
            Aug 31 at 8:33










          • Or you might try "cartesian product", as the graph of your new function is the cartesian product of the graphs of the constituent functions, in a certain sense.
            – kimchi lover
            Aug 31 at 11:59














          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          I don't think there is a generally accepted and generally understood term here. You might say $tilde f$ is the $k$-fold tensor product of itself in some space $bigotimes_1^k V$ of multivariate functions, or use some notation like $f^otimes$, but you would also have to explain precisely what you mean to the audience. Which would end up taking more words and notation than simply giving the formula directly.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • Thanks. I've decided to accept this answer (between the two useful ones I received so far), as "tensor product" is probably the closest well-known concept to the idea I had in mind, even though right now I'm dealing with plain n-tuples that don't have a vector space (or algebra or whatever) structure.
            – Ángel José Riesgo
            Aug 31 at 8:33










          • Or you might try "cartesian product", as the graph of your new function is the cartesian product of the graphs of the constituent functions, in a certain sense.
            – kimchi lover
            Aug 31 at 11:59












          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted






          I don't think there is a generally accepted and generally understood term here. You might say $tilde f$ is the $k$-fold tensor product of itself in some space $bigotimes_1^k V$ of multivariate functions, or use some notation like $f^otimes$, but you would also have to explain precisely what you mean to the audience. Which would end up taking more words and notation than simply giving the formula directly.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          I don't think there is a generally accepted and generally understood term here. You might say $tilde f$ is the $k$-fold tensor product of itself in some space $bigotimes_1^k V$ of multivariate functions, or use some notation like $f^otimes$, but you would also have to explain precisely what you mean to the audience. Which would end up taking more words and notation than simply giving the formula directly.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Aug 22 at 11:44









          kimchi lover

          8,72031128




          8,72031128











          • Thanks. I've decided to accept this answer (between the two useful ones I received so far), as "tensor product" is probably the closest well-known concept to the idea I had in mind, even though right now I'm dealing with plain n-tuples that don't have a vector space (or algebra or whatever) structure.
            – Ángel José Riesgo
            Aug 31 at 8:33










          • Or you might try "cartesian product", as the graph of your new function is the cartesian product of the graphs of the constituent functions, in a certain sense.
            – kimchi lover
            Aug 31 at 11:59
















          • Thanks. I've decided to accept this answer (between the two useful ones I received so far), as "tensor product" is probably the closest well-known concept to the idea I had in mind, even though right now I'm dealing with plain n-tuples that don't have a vector space (or algebra or whatever) structure.
            – Ángel José Riesgo
            Aug 31 at 8:33










          • Or you might try "cartesian product", as the graph of your new function is the cartesian product of the graphs of the constituent functions, in a certain sense.
            – kimchi lover
            Aug 31 at 11:59















          Thanks. I've decided to accept this answer (between the two useful ones I received so far), as "tensor product" is probably the closest well-known concept to the idea I had in mind, even though right now I'm dealing with plain n-tuples that don't have a vector space (or algebra or whatever) structure.
          – Ángel José Riesgo
          Aug 31 at 8:33




          Thanks. I've decided to accept this answer (between the two useful ones I received so far), as "tensor product" is probably the closest well-known concept to the idea I had in mind, even though right now I'm dealing with plain n-tuples that don't have a vector space (or algebra or whatever) structure.
          – Ángel José Riesgo
          Aug 31 at 8:33












          Or you might try "cartesian product", as the graph of your new function is the cartesian product of the graphs of the constituent functions, in a certain sense.
          – kimchi lover
          Aug 31 at 11:59




          Or you might try "cartesian product", as the graph of your new function is the cartesian product of the graphs of the constituent functions, in a certain sense.
          – kimchi lover
          Aug 31 at 11:59










          up vote
          1
          down vote













          Mathematica speaks about "threading a function over lists". It is a built in feature for many standard functions: For example, you get



          N[Sin[1,5,-2,4]]
          0.841471, -0.958924, -0.909297, -0.756802


          If you use such a feature for various functions several times in a paper or talk it pays to invent a special notation.



          If $f$ is a given function acting on points $xin X$ you could denote by $tilde f$ (or similar) the induced function on $n$-tuples of points, whereby $n$ can be arbitrary, but finite.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • It is more typical in functional programming to call this mapping a function over a list. In Mathematica as well, you can do Map[Sin, 1, 5, -2, 4].
            – Rahul
            Aug 23 at 10:11















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          Mathematica speaks about "threading a function over lists". It is a built in feature for many standard functions: For example, you get



          N[Sin[1,5,-2,4]]
          0.841471, -0.958924, -0.909297, -0.756802


          If you use such a feature for various functions several times in a paper or talk it pays to invent a special notation.



          If $f$ is a given function acting on points $xin X$ you could denote by $tilde f$ (or similar) the induced function on $n$-tuples of points, whereby $n$ can be arbitrary, but finite.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • It is more typical in functional programming to call this mapping a function over a list. In Mathematica as well, you can do Map[Sin, 1, 5, -2, 4].
            – Rahul
            Aug 23 at 10:11













          up vote
          1
          down vote










          up vote
          1
          down vote









          Mathematica speaks about "threading a function over lists". It is a built in feature for many standard functions: For example, you get



          N[Sin[1,5,-2,4]]
          0.841471, -0.958924, -0.909297, -0.756802


          If you use such a feature for various functions several times in a paper or talk it pays to invent a special notation.



          If $f$ is a given function acting on points $xin X$ you could denote by $tilde f$ (or similar) the induced function on $n$-tuples of points, whereby $n$ can be arbitrary, but finite.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          Mathematica speaks about "threading a function over lists". It is a built in feature for many standard functions: For example, you get



          N[Sin[1,5,-2,4]]
          0.841471, -0.958924, -0.909297, -0.756802


          If you use such a feature for various functions several times in a paper or talk it pays to invent a special notation.



          If $f$ is a given function acting on points $xin X$ you could denote by $tilde f$ (or similar) the induced function on $n$-tuples of points, whereby $n$ can be arbitrary, but finite.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Aug 23 at 10:00









          Jendrik Stelzner

          7,57221037




          7,57221037










          answered Aug 22 at 15:24









          Christian Blatter

          165k7109310




          165k7109310











          • It is more typical in functional programming to call this mapping a function over a list. In Mathematica as well, you can do Map[Sin, 1, 5, -2, 4].
            – Rahul
            Aug 23 at 10:11

















          • It is more typical in functional programming to call this mapping a function over a list. In Mathematica as well, you can do Map[Sin, 1, 5, -2, 4].
            – Rahul
            Aug 23 at 10:11
















          It is more typical in functional programming to call this mapping a function over a list. In Mathematica as well, you can do Map[Sin, 1, 5, -2, 4].
          – Rahul
          Aug 23 at 10:11





          It is more typical in functional programming to call this mapping a function over a list. In Mathematica as well, you can do Map[Sin, 1, 5, -2, 4].
          – Rahul
          Aug 23 at 10:11













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2890785%2fname-for-the-trivial-extension-of-a-single-variable-real-function-to-several-var%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

          Mutual Information Always Non-negative

          Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?