Name for the trivial extension of a single-variable real function to several variables
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
This is a question about terminology. Is there any common name for the trivial extension of a real function $f colon mathbbR to mathbbR$ to several variables $tildef colon mathbbR^n to mathbbR^n$?
By "trivial extension", I mean defining $tildef$ in terms of $f$ as $tildef(x_1, dots, x_n) = (f(x_1), dots, f(x_n))$.
As a simple example, if we have a trigonometric function like $sin(x)$, we can trivially extend it to $mathbbR^3$ as $sin(x, y, z) = (sin(x), sin(y), sin(z))$. I'm just wondering if there is any accepted name and well-known reference for this simple way of building multivariate functions.
functions reference-request terminology
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
This is a question about terminology. Is there any common name for the trivial extension of a real function $f colon mathbbR to mathbbR$ to several variables $tildef colon mathbbR^n to mathbbR^n$?
By "trivial extension", I mean defining $tildef$ in terms of $f$ as $tildef(x_1, dots, x_n) = (f(x_1), dots, f(x_n))$.
As a simple example, if we have a trigonometric function like $sin(x)$, we can trivially extend it to $mathbbR^3$ as $sin(x, y, z) = (sin(x), sin(y), sin(z))$. I'm just wondering if there is any accepted name and well-known reference for this simple way of building multivariate functions.
functions reference-request terminology
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
This is a question about terminology. Is there any common name for the trivial extension of a real function $f colon mathbbR to mathbbR$ to several variables $tildef colon mathbbR^n to mathbbR^n$?
By "trivial extension", I mean defining $tildef$ in terms of $f$ as $tildef(x_1, dots, x_n) = (f(x_1), dots, f(x_n))$.
As a simple example, if we have a trigonometric function like $sin(x)$, we can trivially extend it to $mathbbR^3$ as $sin(x, y, z) = (sin(x), sin(y), sin(z))$. I'm just wondering if there is any accepted name and well-known reference for this simple way of building multivariate functions.
functions reference-request terminology
This is a question about terminology. Is there any common name for the trivial extension of a real function $f colon mathbbR to mathbbR$ to several variables $tildef colon mathbbR^n to mathbbR^n$?
By "trivial extension", I mean defining $tildef$ in terms of $f$ as $tildef(x_1, dots, x_n) = (f(x_1), dots, f(x_n))$.
As a simple example, if we have a trigonometric function like $sin(x)$, we can trivially extend it to $mathbbR^3$ as $sin(x, y, z) = (sin(x), sin(y), sin(z))$. I'm just wondering if there is any accepted name and well-known reference for this simple way of building multivariate functions.
functions reference-request terminology
edited Aug 22 at 15:25
Brahadeesh
4,13631550
4,13631550
asked Aug 22 at 8:24
Ãngel José Riesgo
253
253
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
I don't think there is a generally accepted and generally understood term here. You might say $tilde f$ is the $k$-fold tensor product of itself in some space $bigotimes_1^k V$ of multivariate functions, or use some notation like $f^otimes$, but you would also have to explain precisely what you mean to the audience. Which would end up taking more words and notation than simply giving the formula directly.
Thanks. I've decided to accept this answer (between the two useful ones I received so far), as "tensor product" is probably the closest well-known concept to the idea I had in mind, even though right now I'm dealing with plain n-tuples that don't have a vector space (or algebra or whatever) structure.
â Ãngel José Riesgo
Aug 31 at 8:33
Or you might try "cartesian product", as the graph of your new function is the cartesian product of the graphs of the constituent functions, in a certain sense.
â kimchi lover
Aug 31 at 11:59
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Mathematica speaks about "threading a function over lists". It is a built in feature for many standard functions: For example, you get
N[Sin[1,5,-2,4]]
0.841471, -0.958924, -0.909297, -0.756802
If you use such a feature for various functions several times in a paper or talk it pays to invent a special notation.
If $f$ is a given function acting on points $xin X$ you could denote by $tilde f$ (or similar) the induced function on $n$-tuples of points, whereby $n$ can be arbitrary, but finite.
It is more typical in functional programming to call this mapping a function over a list. In Mathematica as well, you can doMap[Sin, 1, 5, -2, 4]
.
â Rahul
Aug 23 at 10:11
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
I don't think there is a generally accepted and generally understood term here. You might say $tilde f$ is the $k$-fold tensor product of itself in some space $bigotimes_1^k V$ of multivariate functions, or use some notation like $f^otimes$, but you would also have to explain precisely what you mean to the audience. Which would end up taking more words and notation than simply giving the formula directly.
Thanks. I've decided to accept this answer (between the two useful ones I received so far), as "tensor product" is probably the closest well-known concept to the idea I had in mind, even though right now I'm dealing with plain n-tuples that don't have a vector space (or algebra or whatever) structure.
â Ãngel José Riesgo
Aug 31 at 8:33
Or you might try "cartesian product", as the graph of your new function is the cartesian product of the graphs of the constituent functions, in a certain sense.
â kimchi lover
Aug 31 at 11:59
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
I don't think there is a generally accepted and generally understood term here. You might say $tilde f$ is the $k$-fold tensor product of itself in some space $bigotimes_1^k V$ of multivariate functions, or use some notation like $f^otimes$, but you would also have to explain precisely what you mean to the audience. Which would end up taking more words and notation than simply giving the formula directly.
Thanks. I've decided to accept this answer (between the two useful ones I received so far), as "tensor product" is probably the closest well-known concept to the idea I had in mind, even though right now I'm dealing with plain n-tuples that don't have a vector space (or algebra or whatever) structure.
â Ãngel José Riesgo
Aug 31 at 8:33
Or you might try "cartesian product", as the graph of your new function is the cartesian product of the graphs of the constituent functions, in a certain sense.
â kimchi lover
Aug 31 at 11:59
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
I don't think there is a generally accepted and generally understood term here. You might say $tilde f$ is the $k$-fold tensor product of itself in some space $bigotimes_1^k V$ of multivariate functions, or use some notation like $f^otimes$, but you would also have to explain precisely what you mean to the audience. Which would end up taking more words and notation than simply giving the formula directly.
I don't think there is a generally accepted and generally understood term here. You might say $tilde f$ is the $k$-fold tensor product of itself in some space $bigotimes_1^k V$ of multivariate functions, or use some notation like $f^otimes$, but you would also have to explain precisely what you mean to the audience. Which would end up taking more words and notation than simply giving the formula directly.
answered Aug 22 at 11:44
kimchi lover
8,72031128
8,72031128
Thanks. I've decided to accept this answer (between the two useful ones I received so far), as "tensor product" is probably the closest well-known concept to the idea I had in mind, even though right now I'm dealing with plain n-tuples that don't have a vector space (or algebra or whatever) structure.
â Ãngel José Riesgo
Aug 31 at 8:33
Or you might try "cartesian product", as the graph of your new function is the cartesian product of the graphs of the constituent functions, in a certain sense.
â kimchi lover
Aug 31 at 11:59
add a comment |Â
Thanks. I've decided to accept this answer (between the two useful ones I received so far), as "tensor product" is probably the closest well-known concept to the idea I had in mind, even though right now I'm dealing with plain n-tuples that don't have a vector space (or algebra or whatever) structure.
â Ãngel José Riesgo
Aug 31 at 8:33
Or you might try "cartesian product", as the graph of your new function is the cartesian product of the graphs of the constituent functions, in a certain sense.
â kimchi lover
Aug 31 at 11:59
Thanks. I've decided to accept this answer (between the two useful ones I received so far), as "tensor product" is probably the closest well-known concept to the idea I had in mind, even though right now I'm dealing with plain n-tuples that don't have a vector space (or algebra or whatever) structure.
â Ãngel José Riesgo
Aug 31 at 8:33
Thanks. I've decided to accept this answer (between the two useful ones I received so far), as "tensor product" is probably the closest well-known concept to the idea I had in mind, even though right now I'm dealing with plain n-tuples that don't have a vector space (or algebra or whatever) structure.
â Ãngel José Riesgo
Aug 31 at 8:33
Or you might try "cartesian product", as the graph of your new function is the cartesian product of the graphs of the constituent functions, in a certain sense.
â kimchi lover
Aug 31 at 11:59
Or you might try "cartesian product", as the graph of your new function is the cartesian product of the graphs of the constituent functions, in a certain sense.
â kimchi lover
Aug 31 at 11:59
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Mathematica speaks about "threading a function over lists". It is a built in feature for many standard functions: For example, you get
N[Sin[1,5,-2,4]]
0.841471, -0.958924, -0.909297, -0.756802
If you use such a feature for various functions several times in a paper or talk it pays to invent a special notation.
If $f$ is a given function acting on points $xin X$ you could denote by $tilde f$ (or similar) the induced function on $n$-tuples of points, whereby $n$ can be arbitrary, but finite.
It is more typical in functional programming to call this mapping a function over a list. In Mathematica as well, you can doMap[Sin, 1, 5, -2, 4]
.
â Rahul
Aug 23 at 10:11
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Mathematica speaks about "threading a function over lists". It is a built in feature for many standard functions: For example, you get
N[Sin[1,5,-2,4]]
0.841471, -0.958924, -0.909297, -0.756802
If you use such a feature for various functions several times in a paper or talk it pays to invent a special notation.
If $f$ is a given function acting on points $xin X$ you could denote by $tilde f$ (or similar) the induced function on $n$-tuples of points, whereby $n$ can be arbitrary, but finite.
It is more typical in functional programming to call this mapping a function over a list. In Mathematica as well, you can doMap[Sin, 1, 5, -2, 4]
.
â Rahul
Aug 23 at 10:11
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Mathematica speaks about "threading a function over lists". It is a built in feature for many standard functions: For example, you get
N[Sin[1,5,-2,4]]
0.841471, -0.958924, -0.909297, -0.756802
If you use such a feature for various functions several times in a paper or talk it pays to invent a special notation.
If $f$ is a given function acting on points $xin X$ you could denote by $tilde f$ (or similar) the induced function on $n$-tuples of points, whereby $n$ can be arbitrary, but finite.
Mathematica speaks about "threading a function over lists". It is a built in feature for many standard functions: For example, you get
N[Sin[1,5,-2,4]]
0.841471, -0.958924, -0.909297, -0.756802
If you use such a feature for various functions several times in a paper or talk it pays to invent a special notation.
If $f$ is a given function acting on points $xin X$ you could denote by $tilde f$ (or similar) the induced function on $n$-tuples of points, whereby $n$ can be arbitrary, but finite.
edited Aug 23 at 10:00
Jendrik Stelzner
7,57221037
7,57221037
answered Aug 22 at 15:24
Christian Blatter
165k7109310
165k7109310
It is more typical in functional programming to call this mapping a function over a list. In Mathematica as well, you can doMap[Sin, 1, 5, -2, 4]
.
â Rahul
Aug 23 at 10:11
add a comment |Â
It is more typical in functional programming to call this mapping a function over a list. In Mathematica as well, you can doMap[Sin, 1, 5, -2, 4]
.
â Rahul
Aug 23 at 10:11
It is more typical in functional programming to call this mapping a function over a list. In Mathematica as well, you can do
Map[Sin, 1, 5, -2, 4]
.â Rahul
Aug 23 at 10:11
It is more typical in functional programming to call this mapping a function over a list. In Mathematica as well, you can do
Map[Sin, 1, 5, -2, 4]
.â Rahul
Aug 23 at 10:11
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2890785%2fname-for-the-trivial-extension-of-a-single-variable-real-function-to-several-var%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password