Going up in smoke vs. going up in flames

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
16
down vote

favorite
1












The idioms "to go up in smoke" and "to go up in flames" are very similar. They both mean burning and getting destroyed by fire. But if we use them to talk about failure, aren't there any nuances to remember? Aren't there any shades of meaning that differ?







share|improve this question


























    up vote
    16
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    The idioms "to go up in smoke" and "to go up in flames" are very similar. They both mean burning and getting destroyed by fire. But if we use them to talk about failure, aren't there any nuances to remember? Aren't there any shades of meaning that differ?







    share|improve this question






















      up vote
      16
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      16
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      The idioms "to go up in smoke" and "to go up in flames" are very similar. They both mean burning and getting destroyed by fire. But if we use them to talk about failure, aren't there any nuances to remember? Aren't there any shades of meaning that differ?







      share|improve this question












      The idioms "to go up in smoke" and "to go up in flames" are very similar. They both mean burning and getting destroyed by fire. But if we use them to talk about failure, aren't there any nuances to remember? Aren't there any shades of meaning that differ?









      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Aug 22 at 0:51









      Enguroo

      1,440114




      1,440114




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          33
          down vote



          accepted










          Although these are both fire metaphors, they are not quite the same thing.



          To "go up in smoke" means to disappear, dissipate, fail, or be destroyed as if by burning. A similar idiom would be to be "all for naught".



          To "go up in flames" similarly means to burn, but usually more spectacularly, as if in a conflagration or other disaster. A similar idiom would be to "go down in flames" as in "crash and burn".



          The first implies wasted or futile effort. The second implies spectacular failure.




          My lifelong dream to become a doctor went up in smoke when I found out I would faint at the sight of blood.



          My long-term plan to become a doctor went up in flames when, as a college prank, my friends and I stole the yacht of what turned out to be the director of the medical school.




          Because there is some overlap in these definitions, in many situations you can use either.






          share|improve this answer


















          • 1




            I’d love to see you revamp your second example. It leaves me wondering: isn’t there some way that one’s plans might go up in flames (instead of up in smoke) without any literal fire?
            – J.R.♦
            Aug 22 at 9:21






          • 2




            @J.R. If something goes up in smoke, then it leaves no trace. If something goes in up flames then it's leaves lasting damage. An example for the second that doesn't involve literal flames would be "My plan to become a famous doctor went up in flames when I killed the president"
            – UKMonkey
            Aug 22 at 10:54










          • @J.R. yeah, me too. I thought it was a bit hokey, but all the other options I came up with went to weird places. Anyway, edited :)
            – Andrew
            Aug 22 at 11:37










          • I guess the nuance is related to the expression "vanish in a puff of smoke" (i.e. to disappear completely). This sense feeds "go up in smoke" as much as the fire metaphor does.
            – Toby Speight
            Aug 22 at 11:39






          • 1




            @Andrew - Based on your subtle distinction, I'll tell you which ones went through my mind: My lifelong dream to become a doctor went up in smoke after I failed my clinical exams for the third time in three years vs. My lifelong dream to become a doctor went up in flames after I flunked four of my first five courses in premed.
            – J.R.♦
            Aug 22 at 13:49










          Your Answer







          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "481"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f176967%2fgoing-up-in-smoke-vs-going-up-in-flames%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          33
          down vote



          accepted










          Although these are both fire metaphors, they are not quite the same thing.



          To "go up in smoke" means to disappear, dissipate, fail, or be destroyed as if by burning. A similar idiom would be to be "all for naught".



          To "go up in flames" similarly means to burn, but usually more spectacularly, as if in a conflagration or other disaster. A similar idiom would be to "go down in flames" as in "crash and burn".



          The first implies wasted or futile effort. The second implies spectacular failure.




          My lifelong dream to become a doctor went up in smoke when I found out I would faint at the sight of blood.



          My long-term plan to become a doctor went up in flames when, as a college prank, my friends and I stole the yacht of what turned out to be the director of the medical school.




          Because there is some overlap in these definitions, in many situations you can use either.






          share|improve this answer


















          • 1




            I’d love to see you revamp your second example. It leaves me wondering: isn’t there some way that one’s plans might go up in flames (instead of up in smoke) without any literal fire?
            – J.R.♦
            Aug 22 at 9:21






          • 2




            @J.R. If something goes up in smoke, then it leaves no trace. If something goes in up flames then it's leaves lasting damage. An example for the second that doesn't involve literal flames would be "My plan to become a famous doctor went up in flames when I killed the president"
            – UKMonkey
            Aug 22 at 10:54










          • @J.R. yeah, me too. I thought it was a bit hokey, but all the other options I came up with went to weird places. Anyway, edited :)
            – Andrew
            Aug 22 at 11:37










          • I guess the nuance is related to the expression "vanish in a puff of smoke" (i.e. to disappear completely). This sense feeds "go up in smoke" as much as the fire metaphor does.
            – Toby Speight
            Aug 22 at 11:39






          • 1




            @Andrew - Based on your subtle distinction, I'll tell you which ones went through my mind: My lifelong dream to become a doctor went up in smoke after I failed my clinical exams for the third time in three years vs. My lifelong dream to become a doctor went up in flames after I flunked four of my first five courses in premed.
            – J.R.♦
            Aug 22 at 13:49














          up vote
          33
          down vote



          accepted










          Although these are both fire metaphors, they are not quite the same thing.



          To "go up in smoke" means to disappear, dissipate, fail, or be destroyed as if by burning. A similar idiom would be to be "all for naught".



          To "go up in flames" similarly means to burn, but usually more spectacularly, as if in a conflagration or other disaster. A similar idiom would be to "go down in flames" as in "crash and burn".



          The first implies wasted or futile effort. The second implies spectacular failure.




          My lifelong dream to become a doctor went up in smoke when I found out I would faint at the sight of blood.



          My long-term plan to become a doctor went up in flames when, as a college prank, my friends and I stole the yacht of what turned out to be the director of the medical school.




          Because there is some overlap in these definitions, in many situations you can use either.






          share|improve this answer


















          • 1




            I’d love to see you revamp your second example. It leaves me wondering: isn’t there some way that one’s plans might go up in flames (instead of up in smoke) without any literal fire?
            – J.R.♦
            Aug 22 at 9:21






          • 2




            @J.R. If something goes up in smoke, then it leaves no trace. If something goes in up flames then it's leaves lasting damage. An example for the second that doesn't involve literal flames would be "My plan to become a famous doctor went up in flames when I killed the president"
            – UKMonkey
            Aug 22 at 10:54










          • @J.R. yeah, me too. I thought it was a bit hokey, but all the other options I came up with went to weird places. Anyway, edited :)
            – Andrew
            Aug 22 at 11:37










          • I guess the nuance is related to the expression "vanish in a puff of smoke" (i.e. to disappear completely). This sense feeds "go up in smoke" as much as the fire metaphor does.
            – Toby Speight
            Aug 22 at 11:39






          • 1




            @Andrew - Based on your subtle distinction, I'll tell you which ones went through my mind: My lifelong dream to become a doctor went up in smoke after I failed my clinical exams for the third time in three years vs. My lifelong dream to become a doctor went up in flames after I flunked four of my first five courses in premed.
            – J.R.♦
            Aug 22 at 13:49












          up vote
          33
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          33
          down vote



          accepted






          Although these are both fire metaphors, they are not quite the same thing.



          To "go up in smoke" means to disappear, dissipate, fail, or be destroyed as if by burning. A similar idiom would be to be "all for naught".



          To "go up in flames" similarly means to burn, but usually more spectacularly, as if in a conflagration or other disaster. A similar idiom would be to "go down in flames" as in "crash and burn".



          The first implies wasted or futile effort. The second implies spectacular failure.




          My lifelong dream to become a doctor went up in smoke when I found out I would faint at the sight of blood.



          My long-term plan to become a doctor went up in flames when, as a college prank, my friends and I stole the yacht of what turned out to be the director of the medical school.




          Because there is some overlap in these definitions, in many situations you can use either.






          share|improve this answer














          Although these are both fire metaphors, they are not quite the same thing.



          To "go up in smoke" means to disappear, dissipate, fail, or be destroyed as if by burning. A similar idiom would be to be "all for naught".



          To "go up in flames" similarly means to burn, but usually more spectacularly, as if in a conflagration or other disaster. A similar idiom would be to "go down in flames" as in "crash and burn".



          The first implies wasted or futile effort. The second implies spectacular failure.




          My lifelong dream to become a doctor went up in smoke when I found out I would faint at the sight of blood.



          My long-term plan to become a doctor went up in flames when, as a college prank, my friends and I stole the yacht of what turned out to be the director of the medical school.




          Because there is some overlap in these definitions, in many situations you can use either.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Aug 22 at 11:37

























          answered Aug 22 at 1:29









          Andrew

          56.5k564124




          56.5k564124







          • 1




            I’d love to see you revamp your second example. It leaves me wondering: isn’t there some way that one’s plans might go up in flames (instead of up in smoke) without any literal fire?
            – J.R.♦
            Aug 22 at 9:21






          • 2




            @J.R. If something goes up in smoke, then it leaves no trace. If something goes in up flames then it's leaves lasting damage. An example for the second that doesn't involve literal flames would be "My plan to become a famous doctor went up in flames when I killed the president"
            – UKMonkey
            Aug 22 at 10:54










          • @J.R. yeah, me too. I thought it was a bit hokey, but all the other options I came up with went to weird places. Anyway, edited :)
            – Andrew
            Aug 22 at 11:37










          • I guess the nuance is related to the expression "vanish in a puff of smoke" (i.e. to disappear completely). This sense feeds "go up in smoke" as much as the fire metaphor does.
            – Toby Speight
            Aug 22 at 11:39






          • 1




            @Andrew - Based on your subtle distinction, I'll tell you which ones went through my mind: My lifelong dream to become a doctor went up in smoke after I failed my clinical exams for the third time in three years vs. My lifelong dream to become a doctor went up in flames after I flunked four of my first five courses in premed.
            – J.R.♦
            Aug 22 at 13:49












          • 1




            I’d love to see you revamp your second example. It leaves me wondering: isn’t there some way that one’s plans might go up in flames (instead of up in smoke) without any literal fire?
            – J.R.♦
            Aug 22 at 9:21






          • 2




            @J.R. If something goes up in smoke, then it leaves no trace. If something goes in up flames then it's leaves lasting damage. An example for the second that doesn't involve literal flames would be "My plan to become a famous doctor went up in flames when I killed the president"
            – UKMonkey
            Aug 22 at 10:54










          • @J.R. yeah, me too. I thought it was a bit hokey, but all the other options I came up with went to weird places. Anyway, edited :)
            – Andrew
            Aug 22 at 11:37










          • I guess the nuance is related to the expression "vanish in a puff of smoke" (i.e. to disappear completely). This sense feeds "go up in smoke" as much as the fire metaphor does.
            – Toby Speight
            Aug 22 at 11:39






          • 1




            @Andrew - Based on your subtle distinction, I'll tell you which ones went through my mind: My lifelong dream to become a doctor went up in smoke after I failed my clinical exams for the third time in three years vs. My lifelong dream to become a doctor went up in flames after I flunked four of my first five courses in premed.
            – J.R.♦
            Aug 22 at 13:49







          1




          1




          I’d love to see you revamp your second example. It leaves me wondering: isn’t there some way that one’s plans might go up in flames (instead of up in smoke) without any literal fire?
          – J.R.♦
          Aug 22 at 9:21




          I’d love to see you revamp your second example. It leaves me wondering: isn’t there some way that one’s plans might go up in flames (instead of up in smoke) without any literal fire?
          – J.R.♦
          Aug 22 at 9:21




          2




          2




          @J.R. If something goes up in smoke, then it leaves no trace. If something goes in up flames then it's leaves lasting damage. An example for the second that doesn't involve literal flames would be "My plan to become a famous doctor went up in flames when I killed the president"
          – UKMonkey
          Aug 22 at 10:54




          @J.R. If something goes up in smoke, then it leaves no trace. If something goes in up flames then it's leaves lasting damage. An example for the second that doesn't involve literal flames would be "My plan to become a famous doctor went up in flames when I killed the president"
          – UKMonkey
          Aug 22 at 10:54












          @J.R. yeah, me too. I thought it was a bit hokey, but all the other options I came up with went to weird places. Anyway, edited :)
          – Andrew
          Aug 22 at 11:37




          @J.R. yeah, me too. I thought it was a bit hokey, but all the other options I came up with went to weird places. Anyway, edited :)
          – Andrew
          Aug 22 at 11:37












          I guess the nuance is related to the expression "vanish in a puff of smoke" (i.e. to disappear completely). This sense feeds "go up in smoke" as much as the fire metaphor does.
          – Toby Speight
          Aug 22 at 11:39




          I guess the nuance is related to the expression "vanish in a puff of smoke" (i.e. to disappear completely). This sense feeds "go up in smoke" as much as the fire metaphor does.
          – Toby Speight
          Aug 22 at 11:39




          1




          1




          @Andrew - Based on your subtle distinction, I'll tell you which ones went through my mind: My lifelong dream to become a doctor went up in smoke after I failed my clinical exams for the third time in three years vs. My lifelong dream to become a doctor went up in flames after I flunked four of my first five courses in premed.
          – J.R.♦
          Aug 22 at 13:49




          @Andrew - Based on your subtle distinction, I'll tell you which ones went through my mind: My lifelong dream to become a doctor went up in smoke after I failed my clinical exams for the third time in three years vs. My lifelong dream to become a doctor went up in flames after I flunked four of my first five courses in premed.
          – J.R.♦
          Aug 22 at 13:49












           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f176967%2fgoing-up-in-smoke-vs-going-up-in-flames%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

          Mutual Information Always Non-negative

          Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?