Show that if $X$ and $Y$ are independent then $E_X(g(X,Y))=E(g(X,Y)|Y).$
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Let $X$ and $Y$ be random variables and let $g:mathbb R^2 to mathbb R$ be a non-negative measurable function. If you like assume that $g(X,Y)$ has finite expectation. Let
$$E_X(g(X,Y))=int_mathbb R g(x,Y)dP_X(x),$$
where $P_X=Pcirc X^-1$ is the distribution of $X.$
I am interested in the relationship between $E_X(g(X,Y))$ and $E(g(X,Y)|Y).$ I suspect that the following holds:
If $X$ and $Y$ are independent then
$$E_X(g(X,Y))=E(g(X,Y)|Y).tag*$$
Since I don't have a lot of experience writing proofs with measure-theoretic arguments it would be nice if someone with more experience could have a look at this proof I wrote:
Proof.
In order to show $(*)$ we need to verify
- $E_X(g(X,Y))$ is $sigma(Y)$-measurable
- $forall Ainsigma(Y)$ we have
$$E[1_A E_X(g(X,Y))] = E[1_A g(X,Y)].$$
Regarding 1.:
It is
$$E_X(g(X,Y))=int_mathbb R g(x,Y)dP_X(x)=h(Y),$$
where $h(y)=int_mathbb R g(x,y)dP_X(x)$ is a measurable function. Hence $E_X(g(X,Y))$ is $sigma(Y)$-measurable.
Regarding 2.:
Let $Ainsigma(Y).$ Note that $1_A$ can be written as $1_A=f(Y)$ for some measurable function $f.$ Moreover, since $X$ and $Y$ are independent, it holds that
$$P_(X,Y)=P_Xotimes P_Y.$$
Now write
beginalign
E[1_A g(X,Y)] &= int_Omega 1_A g(X,Y) dP\
&= int_Omega f(Y) g(X,Y) dP\
&= int_mathbb R^2 f(y) g(x,y) dP_(X,Y)(x,y)\
&= int_mathbb R^2 f(y) g(x,y) d(P_Xotimes P_Y)(x,y)\
&= int_mathbb Rint_mathbb R f(y) g(x,y) dP_X(x) dP_Y(y) quadtextby Fubini\
&= int_mathbb Rf(y) int_mathbb R g(x,y) dP_X(x) dP_Y(y)\
&= int_mathbb Rf(y) h(y) dP_Y(y)\
&= int_Omega f(Y) h(Y) dP\
&= int_Omega 1_A E_X(g(X,Y)) dP\
&= E[1_A E_X(g(X,Y))].\
endalign
real-analysis probability-theory measure-theory proof-verification conditional-expectation
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Let $X$ and $Y$ be random variables and let $g:mathbb R^2 to mathbb R$ be a non-negative measurable function. If you like assume that $g(X,Y)$ has finite expectation. Let
$$E_X(g(X,Y))=int_mathbb R g(x,Y)dP_X(x),$$
where $P_X=Pcirc X^-1$ is the distribution of $X.$
I am interested in the relationship between $E_X(g(X,Y))$ and $E(g(X,Y)|Y).$ I suspect that the following holds:
If $X$ and $Y$ are independent then
$$E_X(g(X,Y))=E(g(X,Y)|Y).tag*$$
Since I don't have a lot of experience writing proofs with measure-theoretic arguments it would be nice if someone with more experience could have a look at this proof I wrote:
Proof.
In order to show $(*)$ we need to verify
- $E_X(g(X,Y))$ is $sigma(Y)$-measurable
- $forall Ainsigma(Y)$ we have
$$E[1_A E_X(g(X,Y))] = E[1_A g(X,Y)].$$
Regarding 1.:
It is
$$E_X(g(X,Y))=int_mathbb R g(x,Y)dP_X(x)=h(Y),$$
where $h(y)=int_mathbb R g(x,y)dP_X(x)$ is a measurable function. Hence $E_X(g(X,Y))$ is $sigma(Y)$-measurable.
Regarding 2.:
Let $Ainsigma(Y).$ Note that $1_A$ can be written as $1_A=f(Y)$ for some measurable function $f.$ Moreover, since $X$ and $Y$ are independent, it holds that
$$P_(X,Y)=P_Xotimes P_Y.$$
Now write
beginalign
E[1_A g(X,Y)] &= int_Omega 1_A g(X,Y) dP\
&= int_Omega f(Y) g(X,Y) dP\
&= int_mathbb R^2 f(y) g(x,y) dP_(X,Y)(x,y)\
&= int_mathbb R^2 f(y) g(x,y) d(P_Xotimes P_Y)(x,y)\
&= int_mathbb Rint_mathbb R f(y) g(x,y) dP_X(x) dP_Y(y) quadtextby Fubini\
&= int_mathbb Rf(y) int_mathbb R g(x,y) dP_X(x) dP_Y(y)\
&= int_mathbb Rf(y) h(y) dP_Y(y)\
&= int_Omega f(Y) h(Y) dP\
&= int_Omega 1_A E_X(g(X,Y)) dP\
&= E[1_A E_X(g(X,Y))].\
endalign
real-analysis probability-theory measure-theory proof-verification conditional-expectation
1
Your proof looks fine. Just want to point out that Fubini/Tonelli is applicable because $f$ is actually non-negative.
â Kavi Rama Murthy
Aug 22 at 9:14
Great, thank you.
â Epiousios
Aug 22 at 9:20
Nothing to add. Well done.
â Did
Aug 22 at 10:23
2
Possible duplicate of Define the function $g (y) = E[f(X,y)]$. Show that $g$ is Borel-measurable, and that $E[f (X,Y)|Y=y] = g(y)$
â Gordon
Aug 22 at 16:32
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Let $X$ and $Y$ be random variables and let $g:mathbb R^2 to mathbb R$ be a non-negative measurable function. If you like assume that $g(X,Y)$ has finite expectation. Let
$$E_X(g(X,Y))=int_mathbb R g(x,Y)dP_X(x),$$
where $P_X=Pcirc X^-1$ is the distribution of $X.$
I am interested in the relationship between $E_X(g(X,Y))$ and $E(g(X,Y)|Y).$ I suspect that the following holds:
If $X$ and $Y$ are independent then
$$E_X(g(X,Y))=E(g(X,Y)|Y).tag*$$
Since I don't have a lot of experience writing proofs with measure-theoretic arguments it would be nice if someone with more experience could have a look at this proof I wrote:
Proof.
In order to show $(*)$ we need to verify
- $E_X(g(X,Y))$ is $sigma(Y)$-measurable
- $forall Ainsigma(Y)$ we have
$$E[1_A E_X(g(X,Y))] = E[1_A g(X,Y)].$$
Regarding 1.:
It is
$$E_X(g(X,Y))=int_mathbb R g(x,Y)dP_X(x)=h(Y),$$
where $h(y)=int_mathbb R g(x,y)dP_X(x)$ is a measurable function. Hence $E_X(g(X,Y))$ is $sigma(Y)$-measurable.
Regarding 2.:
Let $Ainsigma(Y).$ Note that $1_A$ can be written as $1_A=f(Y)$ for some measurable function $f.$ Moreover, since $X$ and $Y$ are independent, it holds that
$$P_(X,Y)=P_Xotimes P_Y.$$
Now write
beginalign
E[1_A g(X,Y)] &= int_Omega 1_A g(X,Y) dP\
&= int_Omega f(Y) g(X,Y) dP\
&= int_mathbb R^2 f(y) g(x,y) dP_(X,Y)(x,y)\
&= int_mathbb R^2 f(y) g(x,y) d(P_Xotimes P_Y)(x,y)\
&= int_mathbb Rint_mathbb R f(y) g(x,y) dP_X(x) dP_Y(y) quadtextby Fubini\
&= int_mathbb Rf(y) int_mathbb R g(x,y) dP_X(x) dP_Y(y)\
&= int_mathbb Rf(y) h(y) dP_Y(y)\
&= int_Omega f(Y) h(Y) dP\
&= int_Omega 1_A E_X(g(X,Y)) dP\
&= E[1_A E_X(g(X,Y))].\
endalign
real-analysis probability-theory measure-theory proof-verification conditional-expectation
Let $X$ and $Y$ be random variables and let $g:mathbb R^2 to mathbb R$ be a non-negative measurable function. If you like assume that $g(X,Y)$ has finite expectation. Let
$$E_X(g(X,Y))=int_mathbb R g(x,Y)dP_X(x),$$
where $P_X=Pcirc X^-1$ is the distribution of $X.$
I am interested in the relationship between $E_X(g(X,Y))$ and $E(g(X,Y)|Y).$ I suspect that the following holds:
If $X$ and $Y$ are independent then
$$E_X(g(X,Y))=E(g(X,Y)|Y).tag*$$
Since I don't have a lot of experience writing proofs with measure-theoretic arguments it would be nice if someone with more experience could have a look at this proof I wrote:
Proof.
In order to show $(*)$ we need to verify
- $E_X(g(X,Y))$ is $sigma(Y)$-measurable
- $forall Ainsigma(Y)$ we have
$$E[1_A E_X(g(X,Y))] = E[1_A g(X,Y)].$$
Regarding 1.:
It is
$$E_X(g(X,Y))=int_mathbb R g(x,Y)dP_X(x)=h(Y),$$
where $h(y)=int_mathbb R g(x,y)dP_X(x)$ is a measurable function. Hence $E_X(g(X,Y))$ is $sigma(Y)$-measurable.
Regarding 2.:
Let $Ainsigma(Y).$ Note that $1_A$ can be written as $1_A=f(Y)$ for some measurable function $f.$ Moreover, since $X$ and $Y$ are independent, it holds that
$$P_(X,Y)=P_Xotimes P_Y.$$
Now write
beginalign
E[1_A g(X,Y)] &= int_Omega 1_A g(X,Y) dP\
&= int_Omega f(Y) g(X,Y) dP\
&= int_mathbb R^2 f(y) g(x,y) dP_(X,Y)(x,y)\
&= int_mathbb R^2 f(y) g(x,y) d(P_Xotimes P_Y)(x,y)\
&= int_mathbb Rint_mathbb R f(y) g(x,y) dP_X(x) dP_Y(y) quadtextby Fubini\
&= int_mathbb Rf(y) int_mathbb R g(x,y) dP_X(x) dP_Y(y)\
&= int_mathbb Rf(y) h(y) dP_Y(y)\
&= int_Omega f(Y) h(Y) dP\
&= int_Omega 1_A E_X(g(X,Y)) dP\
&= E[1_A E_X(g(X,Y))].\
endalign
real-analysis probability-theory measure-theory proof-verification conditional-expectation
asked Aug 22 at 8:56
Epiousios
1,501522
1,501522
1
Your proof looks fine. Just want to point out that Fubini/Tonelli is applicable because $f$ is actually non-negative.
â Kavi Rama Murthy
Aug 22 at 9:14
Great, thank you.
â Epiousios
Aug 22 at 9:20
Nothing to add. Well done.
â Did
Aug 22 at 10:23
2
Possible duplicate of Define the function $g (y) = E[f(X,y)]$. Show that $g$ is Borel-measurable, and that $E[f (X,Y)|Y=y] = g(y)$
â Gordon
Aug 22 at 16:32
add a comment |Â
1
Your proof looks fine. Just want to point out that Fubini/Tonelli is applicable because $f$ is actually non-negative.
â Kavi Rama Murthy
Aug 22 at 9:14
Great, thank you.
â Epiousios
Aug 22 at 9:20
Nothing to add. Well done.
â Did
Aug 22 at 10:23
2
Possible duplicate of Define the function $g (y) = E[f(X,y)]$. Show that $g$ is Borel-measurable, and that $E[f (X,Y)|Y=y] = g(y)$
â Gordon
Aug 22 at 16:32
1
1
Your proof looks fine. Just want to point out that Fubini/Tonelli is applicable because $f$ is actually non-negative.
â Kavi Rama Murthy
Aug 22 at 9:14
Your proof looks fine. Just want to point out that Fubini/Tonelli is applicable because $f$ is actually non-negative.
â Kavi Rama Murthy
Aug 22 at 9:14
Great, thank you.
â Epiousios
Aug 22 at 9:20
Great, thank you.
â Epiousios
Aug 22 at 9:20
Nothing to add. Well done.
â Did
Aug 22 at 10:23
Nothing to add. Well done.
â Did
Aug 22 at 10:23
2
2
Possible duplicate of Define the function $g (y) = E[f(X,y)]$. Show that $g$ is Borel-measurable, and that $E[f (X,Y)|Y=y] = g(y)$
â Gordon
Aug 22 at 16:32
Possible duplicate of Define the function $g (y) = E[f(X,y)]$. Show that $g$ is Borel-measurable, and that $E[f (X,Y)|Y=y] = g(y)$
â Gordon
Aug 22 at 16:32
add a comment |Â
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2890815%2fshow-that-if-x-and-y-are-independent-then-e-xgx-y-egx-yy%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
1
Your proof looks fine. Just want to point out that Fubini/Tonelli is applicable because $f$ is actually non-negative.
â Kavi Rama Murthy
Aug 22 at 9:14
Great, thank you.
â Epiousios
Aug 22 at 9:20
Nothing to add. Well done.
â Did
Aug 22 at 10:23
2
Possible duplicate of Define the function $g (y) = E[f(X,y)]$. Show that $g$ is Borel-measurable, and that $E[f (X,Y)|Y=y] = g(y)$
â Gordon
Aug 22 at 16:32