In a group of $n$ people everybody with a mutual friend know different number of people. Do there exist somebody knowing only one person?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
4
down vote

favorite













In a group of n people ($n geq 2$) at least two person knows each other. Assume that if two persons have a mutual friend, they know different number of people.
Prove that in this group there exist a person that knows only one person.




My approach is the following:
Let $G=(V,E)$ be a graph such that $|V(G)|=n$. Assume the contrary, that $deg(v)geq 2$, for all $v in V(G)$. At least two person knows each other so let $v,w in V(G)$ be such that $(v,w) in E(G)$. But, from the assumption $deg(v),deg(w)neq 1$, so there is at least one person $sin V(G)$ such that $v,w,s$ form a cycle. But then they all have a mutual friend, so all know different number of people.



But know I am stuck and don't know how to finish the argument.







share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    4
    down vote

    favorite













    In a group of n people ($n geq 2$) at least two person knows each other. Assume that if two persons have a mutual friend, they know different number of people.
    Prove that in this group there exist a person that knows only one person.




    My approach is the following:
    Let $G=(V,E)$ be a graph such that $|V(G)|=n$. Assume the contrary, that $deg(v)geq 2$, for all $v in V(G)$. At least two person knows each other so let $v,w in V(G)$ be such that $(v,w) in E(G)$. But, from the assumption $deg(v),deg(w)neq 1$, so there is at least one person $sin V(G)$ such that $v,w,s$ form a cycle. But then they all have a mutual friend, so all know different number of people.



    But know I am stuck and don't know how to finish the argument.







    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      4
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      4
      down vote

      favorite












      In a group of n people ($n geq 2$) at least two person knows each other. Assume that if two persons have a mutual friend, they know different number of people.
      Prove that in this group there exist a person that knows only one person.




      My approach is the following:
      Let $G=(V,E)$ be a graph such that $|V(G)|=n$. Assume the contrary, that $deg(v)geq 2$, for all $v in V(G)$. At least two person knows each other so let $v,w in V(G)$ be such that $(v,w) in E(G)$. But, from the assumption $deg(v),deg(w)neq 1$, so there is at least one person $sin V(G)$ such that $v,w,s$ form a cycle. But then they all have a mutual friend, so all know different number of people.



      But know I am stuck and don't know how to finish the argument.







      share|cite|improve this question















      In a group of n people ($n geq 2$) at least two person knows each other. Assume that if two persons have a mutual friend, they know different number of people.
      Prove that in this group there exist a person that knows only one person.




      My approach is the following:
      Let $G=(V,E)$ be a graph such that $|V(G)|=n$. Assume the contrary, that $deg(v)geq 2$, for all $v in V(G)$. At least two person knows each other so let $v,w in V(G)$ be such that $(v,w) in E(G)$. But, from the assumption $deg(v),deg(w)neq 1$, so there is at least one person $sin V(G)$ such that $v,w,s$ form a cycle. But then they all have a mutual friend, so all know different number of people.



      But know I am stuck and don't know how to finish the argument.









      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Aug 22 at 12:42

























      asked Aug 22 at 10:51









      Jack Blackwell

      966




      966




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted










          Let $v$ be a vertex with the highest degree $kgeq 1$ in $G$. Let $v_1,ldots, v_k$ be the vertices connected to $v$. Since $v_i$ and $v_j$ have a common neighbor, we have $deg v_i neq deg v_j$ for all $ineq j$. But $1 leq deg v_i leq k$ for all $i$ and if they are all distinct, one must have $deg v_i =1$ for some $i$.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • Why is there a unique vertex with the highest degree?
            – Jack Blackwell
            Aug 23 at 13:11










          • We don't need it to be unique in the argument.
            – Marco
            Aug 23 at 13:22










          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2890905%2fin-a-group-of-n-people-everybody-with-a-mutual-friend-know-different-number-of%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted










          Let $v$ be a vertex with the highest degree $kgeq 1$ in $G$. Let $v_1,ldots, v_k$ be the vertices connected to $v$. Since $v_i$ and $v_j$ have a common neighbor, we have $deg v_i neq deg v_j$ for all $ineq j$. But $1 leq deg v_i leq k$ for all $i$ and if they are all distinct, one must have $deg v_i =1$ for some $i$.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • Why is there a unique vertex with the highest degree?
            – Jack Blackwell
            Aug 23 at 13:11










          • We don't need it to be unique in the argument.
            – Marco
            Aug 23 at 13:22














          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted










          Let $v$ be a vertex with the highest degree $kgeq 1$ in $G$. Let $v_1,ldots, v_k$ be the vertices connected to $v$. Since $v_i$ and $v_j$ have a common neighbor, we have $deg v_i neq deg v_j$ for all $ineq j$. But $1 leq deg v_i leq k$ for all $i$ and if they are all distinct, one must have $deg v_i =1$ for some $i$.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • Why is there a unique vertex with the highest degree?
            – Jack Blackwell
            Aug 23 at 13:11










          • We don't need it to be unique in the argument.
            – Marco
            Aug 23 at 13:22












          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted






          Let $v$ be a vertex with the highest degree $kgeq 1$ in $G$. Let $v_1,ldots, v_k$ be the vertices connected to $v$. Since $v_i$ and $v_j$ have a common neighbor, we have $deg v_i neq deg v_j$ for all $ineq j$. But $1 leq deg v_i leq k$ for all $i$ and if they are all distinct, one must have $deg v_i =1$ for some $i$.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          Let $v$ be a vertex with the highest degree $kgeq 1$ in $G$. Let $v_1,ldots, v_k$ be the vertices connected to $v$. Since $v_i$ and $v_j$ have a common neighbor, we have $deg v_i neq deg v_j$ for all $ineq j$. But $1 leq deg v_i leq k$ for all $i$ and if they are all distinct, one must have $deg v_i =1$ for some $i$.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Aug 23 at 13:22

























          answered Aug 22 at 13:34









          Marco

          1,3387




          1,3387











          • Why is there a unique vertex with the highest degree?
            – Jack Blackwell
            Aug 23 at 13:11










          • We don't need it to be unique in the argument.
            – Marco
            Aug 23 at 13:22
















          • Why is there a unique vertex with the highest degree?
            – Jack Blackwell
            Aug 23 at 13:11










          • We don't need it to be unique in the argument.
            – Marco
            Aug 23 at 13:22















          Why is there a unique vertex with the highest degree?
          – Jack Blackwell
          Aug 23 at 13:11




          Why is there a unique vertex with the highest degree?
          – Jack Blackwell
          Aug 23 at 13:11












          We don't need it to be unique in the argument.
          – Marco
          Aug 23 at 13:22




          We don't need it to be unique in the argument.
          – Marco
          Aug 23 at 13:22












           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2890905%2fin-a-group-of-n-people-everybody-with-a-mutual-friend-know-different-number-of%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

          Mutual Information Always Non-negative

          Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?