In a group of $n$ people everybody with a mutual friend know different number of people. Do there exist somebody knowing only one person?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
In a group of n people ($n geq 2$) at least two person knows each other. Assume that if two persons have a mutual friend, they know different number of people.
Prove that in this group there exist a person that knows only one person.
My approach is the following:
Let $G=(V,E)$ be a graph such that $|V(G)|=n$. Assume the contrary, that $deg(v)geq 2$, for all $v in V(G)$. At least two person knows each other so let $v,w in V(G)$ be such that $(v,w) in E(G)$. But, from the assumption $deg(v),deg(w)neq 1$, so there is at least one person $sin V(G)$ such that $v,w,s$ form a cycle. But then they all have a mutual friend, so all know different number of people.
But know I am stuck and don't know how to finish the argument.
discrete-mathematics graph-theory
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
In a group of n people ($n geq 2$) at least two person knows each other. Assume that if two persons have a mutual friend, they know different number of people.
Prove that in this group there exist a person that knows only one person.
My approach is the following:
Let $G=(V,E)$ be a graph such that $|V(G)|=n$. Assume the contrary, that $deg(v)geq 2$, for all $v in V(G)$. At least two person knows each other so let $v,w in V(G)$ be such that $(v,w) in E(G)$. But, from the assumption $deg(v),deg(w)neq 1$, so there is at least one person $sin V(G)$ such that $v,w,s$ form a cycle. But then they all have a mutual friend, so all know different number of people.
But know I am stuck and don't know how to finish the argument.
discrete-mathematics graph-theory
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
In a group of n people ($n geq 2$) at least two person knows each other. Assume that if two persons have a mutual friend, they know different number of people.
Prove that in this group there exist a person that knows only one person.
My approach is the following:
Let $G=(V,E)$ be a graph such that $|V(G)|=n$. Assume the contrary, that $deg(v)geq 2$, for all $v in V(G)$. At least two person knows each other so let $v,w in V(G)$ be such that $(v,w) in E(G)$. But, from the assumption $deg(v),deg(w)neq 1$, so there is at least one person $sin V(G)$ such that $v,w,s$ form a cycle. But then they all have a mutual friend, so all know different number of people.
But know I am stuck and don't know how to finish the argument.
discrete-mathematics graph-theory
In a group of n people ($n geq 2$) at least two person knows each other. Assume that if two persons have a mutual friend, they know different number of people.
Prove that in this group there exist a person that knows only one person.
My approach is the following:
Let $G=(V,E)$ be a graph such that $|V(G)|=n$. Assume the contrary, that $deg(v)geq 2$, for all $v in V(G)$. At least two person knows each other so let $v,w in V(G)$ be such that $(v,w) in E(G)$. But, from the assumption $deg(v),deg(w)neq 1$, so there is at least one person $sin V(G)$ such that $v,w,s$ form a cycle. But then they all have a mutual friend, so all know different number of people.
But know I am stuck and don't know how to finish the argument.
discrete-mathematics graph-theory
edited Aug 22 at 12:42
asked Aug 22 at 10:51
Jack Blackwell
966
966
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
Let $v$ be a vertex with the highest degree $kgeq 1$ in $G$. Let $v_1,ldots, v_k$ be the vertices connected to $v$. Since $v_i$ and $v_j$ have a common neighbor, we have $deg v_i neq deg v_j$ for all $ineq j$. But $1 leq deg v_i leq k$ for all $i$ and if they are all distinct, one must have $deg v_i =1$ for some $i$.
Why is there a unique vertex with the highest degree?
â Jack Blackwell
Aug 23 at 13:11
We don't need it to be unique in the argument.
â Marco
Aug 23 at 13:22
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
Let $v$ be a vertex with the highest degree $kgeq 1$ in $G$. Let $v_1,ldots, v_k$ be the vertices connected to $v$. Since $v_i$ and $v_j$ have a common neighbor, we have $deg v_i neq deg v_j$ for all $ineq j$. But $1 leq deg v_i leq k$ for all $i$ and if they are all distinct, one must have $deg v_i =1$ for some $i$.
Why is there a unique vertex with the highest degree?
â Jack Blackwell
Aug 23 at 13:11
We don't need it to be unique in the argument.
â Marco
Aug 23 at 13:22
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
Let $v$ be a vertex with the highest degree $kgeq 1$ in $G$. Let $v_1,ldots, v_k$ be the vertices connected to $v$. Since $v_i$ and $v_j$ have a common neighbor, we have $deg v_i neq deg v_j$ for all $ineq j$. But $1 leq deg v_i leq k$ for all $i$ and if they are all distinct, one must have $deg v_i =1$ for some $i$.
Why is there a unique vertex with the highest degree?
â Jack Blackwell
Aug 23 at 13:11
We don't need it to be unique in the argument.
â Marco
Aug 23 at 13:22
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
Let $v$ be a vertex with the highest degree $kgeq 1$ in $G$. Let $v_1,ldots, v_k$ be the vertices connected to $v$. Since $v_i$ and $v_j$ have a common neighbor, we have $deg v_i neq deg v_j$ for all $ineq j$. But $1 leq deg v_i leq k$ for all $i$ and if they are all distinct, one must have $deg v_i =1$ for some $i$.
Let $v$ be a vertex with the highest degree $kgeq 1$ in $G$. Let $v_1,ldots, v_k$ be the vertices connected to $v$. Since $v_i$ and $v_j$ have a common neighbor, we have $deg v_i neq deg v_j$ for all $ineq j$. But $1 leq deg v_i leq k$ for all $i$ and if they are all distinct, one must have $deg v_i =1$ for some $i$.
edited Aug 23 at 13:22
answered Aug 22 at 13:34
Marco
1,3387
1,3387
Why is there a unique vertex with the highest degree?
â Jack Blackwell
Aug 23 at 13:11
We don't need it to be unique in the argument.
â Marco
Aug 23 at 13:22
add a comment |Â
Why is there a unique vertex with the highest degree?
â Jack Blackwell
Aug 23 at 13:11
We don't need it to be unique in the argument.
â Marco
Aug 23 at 13:22
Why is there a unique vertex with the highest degree?
â Jack Blackwell
Aug 23 at 13:11
Why is there a unique vertex with the highest degree?
â Jack Blackwell
Aug 23 at 13:11
We don't need it to be unique in the argument.
â Marco
Aug 23 at 13:22
We don't need it to be unique in the argument.
â Marco
Aug 23 at 13:22
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2890905%2fin-a-group-of-n-people-everybody-with-a-mutual-friend-know-different-number-of%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password