The Lie Algebra and Tangent Space proof in Brain Hall

Multi tool use
Multi tool use

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite













Corollary 3.46.
Suppose $G subset operatornameGL(n, mathbbC)$ is a matrix Lie group with Lie algebra $mathfrakg$.
Then a matrix $X$ is in $mathfrakg$ if and only if there exists a smooth curve $gamma$ in $operatornameM_n(mathbbC)$ with $gamma(t) in G$ for all $t$ and such that $gamma(0) = I$ and $mathrmdgamma/mathrmdt|_t=0 = X$.
Thus, $mathfrakg$ is the tangent space at the identity to $G$.



Proof.
If $X$ is in $mathfrakg$, then we may take $gamma(t) = e^tX$ and then $gamma(0) = I$ and $mathrmdgamma/mathrmdt|_t=0 = X$.
In the other direction, suppose that $gamma(t)$ is a smooth curve in $G$ with $gamma(0) = I$.
For all sufficiently small $t$, we can write $gamma(t) = e^delta(t)$, where $delta$ is a smooth curve in $mathfrakg$.
Now, the derivative of $delta(t)$ at $t = 0$ is the same as the derivative of $t mapsto t delta'(0)$ at $t = 0$.
Thus, by the chain rule, we have
$$
gamma'(0)
= left.
fracmathrmdmathrmdt e^delta(t)
right|_t=0
= left.
fracmathrmdmathrmdt e^t delta'(0)
right|_t=0
= delta'(0).
$$
Since $delta(t)$ belongs to $mathfrakg$ for all sufficiently small $t$, we conclude (as in the proof of Theorem 3.20) that $delta'(0) = gamma'(0)$ belongs to $mathfrakg$.



(Original image here.)




The conclusion say $delta in mathfrakg implies delta'(0) in mathfrakg$. So why does the derivative belong to $frakg$ too?







share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite













    Corollary 3.46.
    Suppose $G subset operatornameGL(n, mathbbC)$ is a matrix Lie group with Lie algebra $mathfrakg$.
    Then a matrix $X$ is in $mathfrakg$ if and only if there exists a smooth curve $gamma$ in $operatornameM_n(mathbbC)$ with $gamma(t) in G$ for all $t$ and such that $gamma(0) = I$ and $mathrmdgamma/mathrmdt|_t=0 = X$.
    Thus, $mathfrakg$ is the tangent space at the identity to $G$.



    Proof.
    If $X$ is in $mathfrakg$, then we may take $gamma(t) = e^tX$ and then $gamma(0) = I$ and $mathrmdgamma/mathrmdt|_t=0 = X$.
    In the other direction, suppose that $gamma(t)$ is a smooth curve in $G$ with $gamma(0) = I$.
    For all sufficiently small $t$, we can write $gamma(t) = e^delta(t)$, where $delta$ is a smooth curve in $mathfrakg$.
    Now, the derivative of $delta(t)$ at $t = 0$ is the same as the derivative of $t mapsto t delta'(0)$ at $t = 0$.
    Thus, by the chain rule, we have
    $$
    gamma'(0)
    = left.
    fracmathrmdmathrmdt e^delta(t)
    right|_t=0
    = left.
    fracmathrmdmathrmdt e^t delta'(0)
    right|_t=0
    = delta'(0).
    $$
    Since $delta(t)$ belongs to $mathfrakg$ for all sufficiently small $t$, we conclude (as in the proof of Theorem 3.20) that $delta'(0) = gamma'(0)$ belongs to $mathfrakg$.



    (Original image here.)




    The conclusion say $delta in mathfrakg implies delta'(0) in mathfrakg$. So why does the derivative belong to $frakg$ too?







    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite












      Corollary 3.46.
      Suppose $G subset operatornameGL(n, mathbbC)$ is a matrix Lie group with Lie algebra $mathfrakg$.
      Then a matrix $X$ is in $mathfrakg$ if and only if there exists a smooth curve $gamma$ in $operatornameM_n(mathbbC)$ with $gamma(t) in G$ for all $t$ and such that $gamma(0) = I$ and $mathrmdgamma/mathrmdt|_t=0 = X$.
      Thus, $mathfrakg$ is the tangent space at the identity to $G$.



      Proof.
      If $X$ is in $mathfrakg$, then we may take $gamma(t) = e^tX$ and then $gamma(0) = I$ and $mathrmdgamma/mathrmdt|_t=0 = X$.
      In the other direction, suppose that $gamma(t)$ is a smooth curve in $G$ with $gamma(0) = I$.
      For all sufficiently small $t$, we can write $gamma(t) = e^delta(t)$, where $delta$ is a smooth curve in $mathfrakg$.
      Now, the derivative of $delta(t)$ at $t = 0$ is the same as the derivative of $t mapsto t delta'(0)$ at $t = 0$.
      Thus, by the chain rule, we have
      $$
      gamma'(0)
      = left.
      fracmathrmdmathrmdt e^delta(t)
      right|_t=0
      = left.
      fracmathrmdmathrmdt e^t delta'(0)
      right|_t=0
      = delta'(0).
      $$
      Since $delta(t)$ belongs to $mathfrakg$ for all sufficiently small $t$, we conclude (as in the proof of Theorem 3.20) that $delta'(0) = gamma'(0)$ belongs to $mathfrakg$.



      (Original image here.)




      The conclusion say $delta in mathfrakg implies delta'(0) in mathfrakg$. So why does the derivative belong to $frakg$ too?







      share|cite|improve this question















      Corollary 3.46.
      Suppose $G subset operatornameGL(n, mathbbC)$ is a matrix Lie group with Lie algebra $mathfrakg$.
      Then a matrix $X$ is in $mathfrakg$ if and only if there exists a smooth curve $gamma$ in $operatornameM_n(mathbbC)$ with $gamma(t) in G$ for all $t$ and such that $gamma(0) = I$ and $mathrmdgamma/mathrmdt|_t=0 = X$.
      Thus, $mathfrakg$ is the tangent space at the identity to $G$.



      Proof.
      If $X$ is in $mathfrakg$, then we may take $gamma(t) = e^tX$ and then $gamma(0) = I$ and $mathrmdgamma/mathrmdt|_t=0 = X$.
      In the other direction, suppose that $gamma(t)$ is a smooth curve in $G$ with $gamma(0) = I$.
      For all sufficiently small $t$, we can write $gamma(t) = e^delta(t)$, where $delta$ is a smooth curve in $mathfrakg$.
      Now, the derivative of $delta(t)$ at $t = 0$ is the same as the derivative of $t mapsto t delta'(0)$ at $t = 0$.
      Thus, by the chain rule, we have
      $$
      gamma'(0)
      = left.
      fracmathrmdmathrmdt e^delta(t)
      right|_t=0
      = left.
      fracmathrmdmathrmdt e^t delta'(0)
      right|_t=0
      = delta'(0).
      $$
      Since $delta(t)$ belongs to $mathfrakg$ for all sufficiently small $t$, we conclude (as in the proof of Theorem 3.20) that $delta'(0) = gamma'(0)$ belongs to $mathfrakg$.



      (Original image here.)




      The conclusion say $delta in mathfrakg implies delta'(0) in mathfrakg$. So why does the derivative belong to $frakg$ too?









      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Aug 23 at 10:13









      Jendrik Stelzner

      7,57221037




      7,57221037










      asked Aug 22 at 10:25









      Hawk

      5,27393699




      5,27393699




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Since Lie algebra is a linear space, we suppose $v_1,v_2,cdots,v_n$ is a basis of $mathfrakg$.



          $delta(t)in mathfrakg$, so we have $delta(t)=sum_j=1^nf_j(t)v_j$.



          It's obvious that $delta'(t)|_t=0=sum_j=1^nf_j'(0)v_jin mathfrakg$.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • So when we take the derivative, why doesn't that pass over to the basis elements $v_i$?
            – Hawk
            Aug 22 at 11:11










          • The basis element $v_i$ is a constant matrix. For example, $sl(2,mathbbR)=spanbeginpmatrix1&0\0&-1endpmatrix,beginpmatrix0&0\1&0endpmatrix,beginpmatrix0&1\0&0endpmatrix.$
            – W. mu
            Aug 22 at 11:16











          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2890882%2fthe-lie-algebra-and-tangent-space-proof-in-brain-hall%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Since Lie algebra is a linear space, we suppose $v_1,v_2,cdots,v_n$ is a basis of $mathfrakg$.



          $delta(t)in mathfrakg$, so we have $delta(t)=sum_j=1^nf_j(t)v_j$.



          It's obvious that $delta'(t)|_t=0=sum_j=1^nf_j'(0)v_jin mathfrakg$.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • So when we take the derivative, why doesn't that pass over to the basis elements $v_i$?
            – Hawk
            Aug 22 at 11:11










          • The basis element $v_i$ is a constant matrix. For example, $sl(2,mathbbR)=spanbeginpmatrix1&0\0&-1endpmatrix,beginpmatrix0&0\1&0endpmatrix,beginpmatrix0&1\0&0endpmatrix.$
            – W. mu
            Aug 22 at 11:16















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Since Lie algebra is a linear space, we suppose $v_1,v_2,cdots,v_n$ is a basis of $mathfrakg$.



          $delta(t)in mathfrakg$, so we have $delta(t)=sum_j=1^nf_j(t)v_j$.



          It's obvious that $delta'(t)|_t=0=sum_j=1^nf_j'(0)v_jin mathfrakg$.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • So when we take the derivative, why doesn't that pass over to the basis elements $v_i$?
            – Hawk
            Aug 22 at 11:11










          • The basis element $v_i$ is a constant matrix. For example, $sl(2,mathbbR)=spanbeginpmatrix1&0\0&-1endpmatrix,beginpmatrix0&0\1&0endpmatrix,beginpmatrix0&1\0&0endpmatrix.$
            – W. mu
            Aug 22 at 11:16













          up vote
          0
          down vote










          up vote
          0
          down vote









          Since Lie algebra is a linear space, we suppose $v_1,v_2,cdots,v_n$ is a basis of $mathfrakg$.



          $delta(t)in mathfrakg$, so we have $delta(t)=sum_j=1^nf_j(t)v_j$.



          It's obvious that $delta'(t)|_t=0=sum_j=1^nf_j'(0)v_jin mathfrakg$.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Since Lie algebra is a linear space, we suppose $v_1,v_2,cdots,v_n$ is a basis of $mathfrakg$.



          $delta(t)in mathfrakg$, so we have $delta(t)=sum_j=1^nf_j(t)v_j$.



          It's obvious that $delta'(t)|_t=0=sum_j=1^nf_j'(0)v_jin mathfrakg$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Aug 22 at 10:54









          W. mu

          64019




          64019











          • So when we take the derivative, why doesn't that pass over to the basis elements $v_i$?
            – Hawk
            Aug 22 at 11:11










          • The basis element $v_i$ is a constant matrix. For example, $sl(2,mathbbR)=spanbeginpmatrix1&0\0&-1endpmatrix,beginpmatrix0&0\1&0endpmatrix,beginpmatrix0&1\0&0endpmatrix.$
            – W. mu
            Aug 22 at 11:16

















          • So when we take the derivative, why doesn't that pass over to the basis elements $v_i$?
            – Hawk
            Aug 22 at 11:11










          • The basis element $v_i$ is a constant matrix. For example, $sl(2,mathbbR)=spanbeginpmatrix1&0\0&-1endpmatrix,beginpmatrix0&0\1&0endpmatrix,beginpmatrix0&1\0&0endpmatrix.$
            – W. mu
            Aug 22 at 11:16
















          So when we take the derivative, why doesn't that pass over to the basis elements $v_i$?
          – Hawk
          Aug 22 at 11:11




          So when we take the derivative, why doesn't that pass over to the basis elements $v_i$?
          – Hawk
          Aug 22 at 11:11












          The basis element $v_i$ is a constant matrix. For example, $sl(2,mathbbR)=spanbeginpmatrix1&0\0&-1endpmatrix,beginpmatrix0&0\1&0endpmatrix,beginpmatrix0&1\0&0endpmatrix.$
          – W. mu
          Aug 22 at 11:16





          The basis element $v_i$ is a constant matrix. For example, $sl(2,mathbbR)=spanbeginpmatrix1&0\0&-1endpmatrix,beginpmatrix0&0\1&0endpmatrix,beginpmatrix0&1\0&0endpmatrix.$
          – W. mu
          Aug 22 at 11:16













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2890882%2fthe-lie-algebra-and-tangent-space-proof-in-brain-hall%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          9j,jpUOpQA,pTrF1Z7T5z,E4OxrIkWkcFwAIT6rRi5qUPFu,qISQ9Mr4f b0FnqFv cNkxYoxrk8Ga1 cO
          8CTWMy1nb,fNjDJOmOWyxh46Zx7oX0BrqJCv6gRew0oLYIp6MgsDC

          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

          Propositional logic and tautologies

          Distribution of Stopped Wiener Process with Stochastic Volatility