What is wrong in the congruence of the triangles?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I have an isosceles trapezoid $ABCD$.



In my development, I have obtained that the parallel sides are equal. But that is impossible, because if that happened, it would be a parallelogram.



So, what is the error in my development? Thanks in advance.



enter image description here



Basically, $DC$ can't be equal to $AB$, so what is my mistake?







share|cite|improve this question





















  • What are you trying to prove about this trapezoid?
    – Robert Howard
    Aug 7 at 19:04










  • nothing, but in my development, the paralallel sides are equal, and it is impossible because in that case, it can be a parallelogram
    – Mattiu
    Aug 7 at 19:30






  • 3




    @Mattiu The two angles that you labeled $,alpha,$ are not equal.
    – dxiv
    Aug 7 at 19:33










  • why? if is trapezoid ab and cd are parallel
    – Mattiu
    Aug 7 at 19:43






  • 3




    AD and BC are not parallel; in the two alpha angles, AC is a transversal, and if you wanted those marked angles to be equal, you'd want AD and CB to be parallel. But here we have AB and CD are parallel, and nothing about AD and CB.
    – Faraz Masroor
    Aug 7 at 19:49














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I have an isosceles trapezoid $ABCD$.



In my development, I have obtained that the parallel sides are equal. But that is impossible, because if that happened, it would be a parallelogram.



So, what is the error in my development? Thanks in advance.



enter image description here



Basically, $DC$ can't be equal to $AB$, so what is my mistake?







share|cite|improve this question





















  • What are you trying to prove about this trapezoid?
    – Robert Howard
    Aug 7 at 19:04










  • nothing, but in my development, the paralallel sides are equal, and it is impossible because in that case, it can be a parallelogram
    – Mattiu
    Aug 7 at 19:30






  • 3




    @Mattiu The two angles that you labeled $,alpha,$ are not equal.
    – dxiv
    Aug 7 at 19:33










  • why? if is trapezoid ab and cd are parallel
    – Mattiu
    Aug 7 at 19:43






  • 3




    AD and BC are not parallel; in the two alpha angles, AC is a transversal, and if you wanted those marked angles to be equal, you'd want AD and CB to be parallel. But here we have AB and CD are parallel, and nothing about AD and CB.
    – Faraz Masroor
    Aug 7 at 19:49












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I have an isosceles trapezoid $ABCD$.



In my development, I have obtained that the parallel sides are equal. But that is impossible, because if that happened, it would be a parallelogram.



So, what is the error in my development? Thanks in advance.



enter image description here



Basically, $DC$ can't be equal to $AB$, so what is my mistake?







share|cite|improve this question













I have an isosceles trapezoid $ABCD$.



In my development, I have obtained that the parallel sides are equal. But that is impossible, because if that happened, it would be a parallelogram.



So, what is the error in my development? Thanks in advance.



enter image description here



Basically, $DC$ can't be equal to $AB$, so what is my mistake?









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 7 at 19:30









Robert Howard

1,331620




1,331620









asked Aug 7 at 18:38









Mattiu

780316




780316











  • What are you trying to prove about this trapezoid?
    – Robert Howard
    Aug 7 at 19:04










  • nothing, but in my development, the paralallel sides are equal, and it is impossible because in that case, it can be a parallelogram
    – Mattiu
    Aug 7 at 19:30






  • 3




    @Mattiu The two angles that you labeled $,alpha,$ are not equal.
    – dxiv
    Aug 7 at 19:33










  • why? if is trapezoid ab and cd are parallel
    – Mattiu
    Aug 7 at 19:43






  • 3




    AD and BC are not parallel; in the two alpha angles, AC is a transversal, and if you wanted those marked angles to be equal, you'd want AD and CB to be parallel. But here we have AB and CD are parallel, and nothing about AD and CB.
    – Faraz Masroor
    Aug 7 at 19:49
















  • What are you trying to prove about this trapezoid?
    – Robert Howard
    Aug 7 at 19:04










  • nothing, but in my development, the paralallel sides are equal, and it is impossible because in that case, it can be a parallelogram
    – Mattiu
    Aug 7 at 19:30






  • 3




    @Mattiu The two angles that you labeled $,alpha,$ are not equal.
    – dxiv
    Aug 7 at 19:33










  • why? if is trapezoid ab and cd are parallel
    – Mattiu
    Aug 7 at 19:43






  • 3




    AD and BC are not parallel; in the two alpha angles, AC is a transversal, and if you wanted those marked angles to be equal, you'd want AD and CB to be parallel. But here we have AB and CD are parallel, and nothing about AD and CB.
    – Faraz Masroor
    Aug 7 at 19:49















What are you trying to prove about this trapezoid?
– Robert Howard
Aug 7 at 19:04




What are you trying to prove about this trapezoid?
– Robert Howard
Aug 7 at 19:04












nothing, but in my development, the paralallel sides are equal, and it is impossible because in that case, it can be a parallelogram
– Mattiu
Aug 7 at 19:30




nothing, but in my development, the paralallel sides are equal, and it is impossible because in that case, it can be a parallelogram
– Mattiu
Aug 7 at 19:30




3




3




@Mattiu The two angles that you labeled $,alpha,$ are not equal.
– dxiv
Aug 7 at 19:33




@Mattiu The two angles that you labeled $,alpha,$ are not equal.
– dxiv
Aug 7 at 19:33












why? if is trapezoid ab and cd are parallel
– Mattiu
Aug 7 at 19:43




why? if is trapezoid ab and cd are parallel
– Mattiu
Aug 7 at 19:43




3




3




AD and BC are not parallel; in the two alpha angles, AC is a transversal, and if you wanted those marked angles to be equal, you'd want AD and CB to be parallel. But here we have AB and CD are parallel, and nothing about AD and CB.
– Faraz Masroor
Aug 7 at 19:49




AD and BC are not parallel; in the two alpha angles, AC is a transversal, and if you wanted those marked angles to be equal, you'd want AD and CB to be parallel. But here we have AB and CD are parallel, and nothing about AD and CB.
– Faraz Masroor
Aug 7 at 19:49










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote



accepted










Are you given those angles are equal?



If so then the trapezoid IS a parallelogram that is not drawn to scale. (Who told you that the trapezoid wasn't a parallelogram?)



The angles marked $beta$ must be equal because $overlineDC$ is parallel to $overlineAB$. But the angles marked $alpha$ are equal if and only if $overlineAD$ is parallel to $overlineBC$.



Which if this is drawn to scale they are not; but which otherwise you have no reason to rule out.



=====



Ah. I see. $angle DCA = beta$ but $angle ACB ne alpha$.



Because it is a isoceles trapezoid the base angles are congruent. Then base angles are $angle ABC$ and $angle DAB$ so $angle ABC = angle DAB =alpha + beta$.



$angle DBC$ is NOT a base angle. And $angle DBC ne angle DAB$ (even though $angle DCA = beta$.)






share|cite|improve this answer






























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    Peter's right that you don't have similar triangles, but here's another way to check. A sanity check, if you will.



    A defining characteristic of similar triangles is that their angles have the same measures. It's easy to see that $triangle ACD$ has an obtuse angle, while $triangle CAB$ does not. Therefore, there's no way the two can be similar.






    share|cite|improve this answer

















    • 1




      A good point! (+1)
      – Peter
      Aug 7 at 19:51

















    up vote
    0
    down vote













    The angle $alpha$ does not occur twice because $AD$ and $BC$ are not parallel.



    Hence you do not have similar triangles.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • why? in a isosceles trapezoid exist one pair of sides are parallel and the other are congruent
      – Mattiu
      Aug 7 at 19:28










    • @Mattiu Sorry, I mixed the letters. Fixed
      – Peter
      Aug 7 at 19:48











    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );








     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2875256%2fwhat-is-wrong-in-the-congruence-of-the-triangles%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote



    accepted










    Are you given those angles are equal?



    If so then the trapezoid IS a parallelogram that is not drawn to scale. (Who told you that the trapezoid wasn't a parallelogram?)



    The angles marked $beta$ must be equal because $overlineDC$ is parallel to $overlineAB$. But the angles marked $alpha$ are equal if and only if $overlineAD$ is parallel to $overlineBC$.



    Which if this is drawn to scale they are not; but which otherwise you have no reason to rule out.



    =====



    Ah. I see. $angle DCA = beta$ but $angle ACB ne alpha$.



    Because it is a isoceles trapezoid the base angles are congruent. Then base angles are $angle ABC$ and $angle DAB$ so $angle ABC = angle DAB =alpha + beta$.



    $angle DBC$ is NOT a base angle. And $angle DBC ne angle DAB$ (even though $angle DCA = beta$.)






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      0
      down vote



      accepted










      Are you given those angles are equal?



      If so then the trapezoid IS a parallelogram that is not drawn to scale. (Who told you that the trapezoid wasn't a parallelogram?)



      The angles marked $beta$ must be equal because $overlineDC$ is parallel to $overlineAB$. But the angles marked $alpha$ are equal if and only if $overlineAD$ is parallel to $overlineBC$.



      Which if this is drawn to scale they are not; but which otherwise you have no reason to rule out.



      =====



      Ah. I see. $angle DCA = beta$ but $angle ACB ne alpha$.



      Because it is a isoceles trapezoid the base angles are congruent. Then base angles are $angle ABC$ and $angle DAB$ so $angle ABC = angle DAB =alpha + beta$.



      $angle DBC$ is NOT a base angle. And $angle DBC ne angle DAB$ (even though $angle DCA = beta$.)






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        0
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        0
        down vote



        accepted






        Are you given those angles are equal?



        If so then the trapezoid IS a parallelogram that is not drawn to scale. (Who told you that the trapezoid wasn't a parallelogram?)



        The angles marked $beta$ must be equal because $overlineDC$ is parallel to $overlineAB$. But the angles marked $alpha$ are equal if and only if $overlineAD$ is parallel to $overlineBC$.



        Which if this is drawn to scale they are not; but which otherwise you have no reason to rule out.



        =====



        Ah. I see. $angle DCA = beta$ but $angle ACB ne alpha$.



        Because it is a isoceles trapezoid the base angles are congruent. Then base angles are $angle ABC$ and $angle DAB$ so $angle ABC = angle DAB =alpha + beta$.



        $angle DBC$ is NOT a base angle. And $angle DBC ne angle DAB$ (even though $angle DCA = beta$.)






        share|cite|improve this answer















        Are you given those angles are equal?



        If so then the trapezoid IS a parallelogram that is not drawn to scale. (Who told you that the trapezoid wasn't a parallelogram?)



        The angles marked $beta$ must be equal because $overlineDC$ is parallel to $overlineAB$. But the angles marked $alpha$ are equal if and only if $overlineAD$ is parallel to $overlineBC$.



        Which if this is drawn to scale they are not; but which otherwise you have no reason to rule out.



        =====



        Ah. I see. $angle DCA = beta$ but $angle ACB ne alpha$.



        Because it is a isoceles trapezoid the base angles are congruent. Then base angles are $angle ABC$ and $angle DAB$ so $angle ABC = angle DAB =alpha + beta$.



        $angle DBC$ is NOT a base angle. And $angle DBC ne angle DAB$ (even though $angle DCA = beta$.)







        share|cite|improve this answer















        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Aug 7 at 20:08


























        answered Aug 7 at 20:02









        fleablood

        60.6k22575




        60.6k22575




















            up vote
            1
            down vote













            Peter's right that you don't have similar triangles, but here's another way to check. A sanity check, if you will.



            A defining characteristic of similar triangles is that their angles have the same measures. It's easy to see that $triangle ACD$ has an obtuse angle, while $triangle CAB$ does not. Therefore, there's no way the two can be similar.






            share|cite|improve this answer

















            • 1




              A good point! (+1)
              – Peter
              Aug 7 at 19:51














            up vote
            1
            down vote













            Peter's right that you don't have similar triangles, but here's another way to check. A sanity check, if you will.



            A defining characteristic of similar triangles is that their angles have the same measures. It's easy to see that $triangle ACD$ has an obtuse angle, while $triangle CAB$ does not. Therefore, there's no way the two can be similar.






            share|cite|improve this answer

















            • 1




              A good point! (+1)
              – Peter
              Aug 7 at 19:51












            up vote
            1
            down vote










            up vote
            1
            down vote









            Peter's right that you don't have similar triangles, but here's another way to check. A sanity check, if you will.



            A defining characteristic of similar triangles is that their angles have the same measures. It's easy to see that $triangle ACD$ has an obtuse angle, while $triangle CAB$ does not. Therefore, there's no way the two can be similar.






            share|cite|improve this answer













            Peter's right that you don't have similar triangles, but here's another way to check. A sanity check, if you will.



            A defining characteristic of similar triangles is that their angles have the same measures. It's easy to see that $triangle ACD$ has an obtuse angle, while $triangle CAB$ does not. Therefore, there's no way the two can be similar.







            share|cite|improve this answer













            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer











            answered Aug 7 at 19:48









            Robert Howard

            1,331620




            1,331620







            • 1




              A good point! (+1)
              – Peter
              Aug 7 at 19:51












            • 1




              A good point! (+1)
              – Peter
              Aug 7 at 19:51







            1




            1




            A good point! (+1)
            – Peter
            Aug 7 at 19:51




            A good point! (+1)
            – Peter
            Aug 7 at 19:51










            up vote
            0
            down vote













            The angle $alpha$ does not occur twice because $AD$ and $BC$ are not parallel.



            Hence you do not have similar triangles.






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • why? in a isosceles trapezoid exist one pair of sides are parallel and the other are congruent
              – Mattiu
              Aug 7 at 19:28










            • @Mattiu Sorry, I mixed the letters. Fixed
              – Peter
              Aug 7 at 19:48















            up vote
            0
            down vote













            The angle $alpha$ does not occur twice because $AD$ and $BC$ are not parallel.



            Hence you do not have similar triangles.






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • why? in a isosceles trapezoid exist one pair of sides are parallel and the other are congruent
              – Mattiu
              Aug 7 at 19:28










            • @Mattiu Sorry, I mixed the letters. Fixed
              – Peter
              Aug 7 at 19:48













            up vote
            0
            down vote










            up vote
            0
            down vote









            The angle $alpha$ does not occur twice because $AD$ and $BC$ are not parallel.



            Hence you do not have similar triangles.






            share|cite|improve this answer















            The angle $alpha$ does not occur twice because $AD$ and $BC$ are not parallel.



            Hence you do not have similar triangles.







            share|cite|improve this answer















            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Aug 7 at 19:48


























            answered Aug 7 at 18:43









            Peter

            45.1k939119




            45.1k939119











            • why? in a isosceles trapezoid exist one pair of sides are parallel and the other are congruent
              – Mattiu
              Aug 7 at 19:28










            • @Mattiu Sorry, I mixed the letters. Fixed
              – Peter
              Aug 7 at 19:48

















            • why? in a isosceles trapezoid exist one pair of sides are parallel and the other are congruent
              – Mattiu
              Aug 7 at 19:28










            • @Mattiu Sorry, I mixed the letters. Fixed
              – Peter
              Aug 7 at 19:48
















            why? in a isosceles trapezoid exist one pair of sides are parallel and the other are congruent
            – Mattiu
            Aug 7 at 19:28




            why? in a isosceles trapezoid exist one pair of sides are parallel and the other are congruent
            – Mattiu
            Aug 7 at 19:28












            @Mattiu Sorry, I mixed the letters. Fixed
            – Peter
            Aug 7 at 19:48





            @Mattiu Sorry, I mixed the letters. Fixed
            – Peter
            Aug 7 at 19:48













             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


























             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2875256%2fwhat-is-wrong-in-the-congruence-of-the-triangles%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            這個網誌中的熱門文章

            How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

            Mutual Information Always Non-negative

            Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?