How to show $CP^1times CP^1$ and $CP^2$ blow up one point are not diffeomorphic?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
How can we prove $CP^1times CP^1$ and $CP^2$ blow up one point is not diffeomorphic?
I tried to compute their Hodge numbers and Chern numbers but they are the same.
algebraic-topology differential-topology complex-geometry blowup
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
How can we prove $CP^1times CP^1$ and $CP^2$ blow up one point is not diffeomorphic?
I tried to compute their Hodge numbers and Chern numbers but they are the same.
algebraic-topology differential-topology complex-geometry blowup
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
How can we prove $CP^1times CP^1$ and $CP^2$ blow up one point is not diffeomorphic?
I tried to compute their Hodge numbers and Chern numbers but they are the same.
algebraic-topology differential-topology complex-geometry blowup
How can we prove $CP^1times CP^1$ and $CP^2$ blow up one point is not diffeomorphic?
I tried to compute their Hodge numbers and Chern numbers but they are the same.
algebraic-topology differential-topology complex-geometry blowup
edited Aug 8 at 15:22
Anubhav Mukherjee
4,6411826
4,6411826
asked Aug 7 at 19:19
User X
918
918
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
You can look at the cohomology ring structure.
More precisely, $H^2(Bbb P^1 times Bbb P^1, Bbb Z)$ is generated by $[L]$ and $[L']$, where $L = 1 times Bbb P^1$ and $L' = Bbb P^1 times 1}$. We have $L^2 = (L')^2 = 0$ and $LL' = 1$. In particular, for any $C = aL + b L'$, $C^2$ is even, but $E^2 = -1$ when $E$ is the exceptional divisor of the blow-up, contradiction.
In fact there are pretty close because they can be both decomposed as $$(Bbb C^*)^2 cup Bbb C^* cup Bbb C^* cup Bbb C^* cup Bbb C^* cup pt cup pt cup pt cup pt$$ So they are equal in the Grothendieck ring of varieties, in particular have same Hodge numbers.
1
The first sentence is correct. However, the sentence starting "more precisely" is not completely convincing to me, because a (non-algebraic) diffeomorphism need not take effective curves to effective curves. An alternative argument would be to say that the intersection form on $H^2$ is even in the case of $mathbf P^1 times mathbf P^1$ but not in the other case.
â Asal Beag Dubh
Aug 8 at 14:51
@AsalBeagDubh : Dear Asal, many thanks for your comment ! I edited my answer.
â Nicolas Hemelsoet
Aug 8 at 19:40
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
You can do this using Kirby calculus and diagrams. I'll not attempt to draw any diagrams, but since you already have two clearly articulated answers, I'll just leave this as an alternative method.
Both the spaces are $S^2$ bundles over $S^2$, and as such are characterised up to diffeomorphism by their mod 2 Euler numbers. The Kirby calculus for such objects is well understood and documented.
Each space has a handle decomposition with exactly two 2-handles. A Kirby diagram for $mathbbCP^1timesmathbbCP^1cong S^2times S^2$ consists of Hopf link of two $0$-framed unknots.
On the other hand a Kirby diagram of the blow up $mathbbCP^2#overlinemathbbCP^2$ consists of a pair of disjoint unkots, one with framing $+1$ and one with framing $-1$. Performing a handle slide of the $-1$-unknot over the other generates a Hopf link of a $1$-framed unknot and a $-1+1=0$-framed unkot.
Further handle slides can change the $(0,0)$-Hopf link of $S^2times S^2$ into a $(0,2n)$-framed Hopf link. Similarly, handle slides can change the $(0,1)$-framed Hopf link of $mathbbCP^2#overlinemathbbCP^2$ into a $(0,2n+1)$-framed Hopf link, but the difference of parity cannot be reconciled by any permitted Kirby moves.
Since the handle slide operation preserves the diffeomorphism type, it's clear now that the two spaces we started with are not diffeomorphic.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
Topologically speaking, blowing up of $M$ at a point means you get $M'= M# barmathbb CP^2$. Signature
$sigma(mathbb CP^1times mathbb CP^1 # barmathbb CP^2)= -1$. Where as $sigma (mathbb CP^2# barmathbb CP^2)=0$. So they are not even homotopically equivalent.
Interesting fact is that if you blow up $mathbb CP^2$ in two points then $mathbb CP^2# 2barmathbb CP^2$ is actually diffeomorphic to $mathbb CP^1times mathbb CP^1 # barmathbb CP^2$.
*EDIT I misread your original question. The reason $mathbb CP^1times mathbb CP^1$ is not diffeomorphic with $mathbb CP^2# barmathbb CP^2$ is because they have different co-homology ring. One way to see that in both cases $H^2$ is generated by two copies of $[mathbb CP^1]$ namely $alpha$ and $beta$. But for the first case $alpha cup beta neq 0$ and $alpha cup alpha = beta cup beta =0$ follows from product formula. On the other case. i.e, $mathbb CP^2# barmathbb CP^2$, $alphacup beta =0$. And $alpha cup alpha neq 0$ and $beta cup beta neq 0$. Thus they have different cohomology ring.
Yeah, but I mean $CP^2$ blow up one point and $CP^1times CP^1$ :)
â User X
Aug 11 at 8:00
The co-homology ring of CP1 x CP1 is different from the other. Then the question become much easier. I read wrong and gave a solution
â Anubhav Mukherjee
Aug 11 at 14:48
If you consider two generator of H^2. In one case that is trivial where as on the other case that is non-trivial
â Anubhav Mukherjee
Aug 11 at 14:50
@UserX I have edited
â Anubhav Mukherjee
Aug 12 at 13:31
add a comment |Â
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
You can look at the cohomology ring structure.
More precisely, $H^2(Bbb P^1 times Bbb P^1, Bbb Z)$ is generated by $[L]$ and $[L']$, where $L = 1 times Bbb P^1$ and $L' = Bbb P^1 times 1}$. We have $L^2 = (L')^2 = 0$ and $LL' = 1$. In particular, for any $C = aL + b L'$, $C^2$ is even, but $E^2 = -1$ when $E$ is the exceptional divisor of the blow-up, contradiction.
In fact there are pretty close because they can be both decomposed as $$(Bbb C^*)^2 cup Bbb C^* cup Bbb C^* cup Bbb C^* cup Bbb C^* cup pt cup pt cup pt cup pt$$ So they are equal in the Grothendieck ring of varieties, in particular have same Hodge numbers.
1
The first sentence is correct. However, the sentence starting "more precisely" is not completely convincing to me, because a (non-algebraic) diffeomorphism need not take effective curves to effective curves. An alternative argument would be to say that the intersection form on $H^2$ is even in the case of $mathbf P^1 times mathbf P^1$ but not in the other case.
â Asal Beag Dubh
Aug 8 at 14:51
@AsalBeagDubh : Dear Asal, many thanks for your comment ! I edited my answer.
â Nicolas Hemelsoet
Aug 8 at 19:40
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
You can look at the cohomology ring structure.
More precisely, $H^2(Bbb P^1 times Bbb P^1, Bbb Z)$ is generated by $[L]$ and $[L']$, where $L = 1 times Bbb P^1$ and $L' = Bbb P^1 times 1}$. We have $L^2 = (L')^2 = 0$ and $LL' = 1$. In particular, for any $C = aL + b L'$, $C^2$ is even, but $E^2 = -1$ when $E$ is the exceptional divisor of the blow-up, contradiction.
In fact there are pretty close because they can be both decomposed as $$(Bbb C^*)^2 cup Bbb C^* cup Bbb C^* cup Bbb C^* cup Bbb C^* cup pt cup pt cup pt cup pt$$ So they are equal in the Grothendieck ring of varieties, in particular have same Hodge numbers.
1
The first sentence is correct. However, the sentence starting "more precisely" is not completely convincing to me, because a (non-algebraic) diffeomorphism need not take effective curves to effective curves. An alternative argument would be to say that the intersection form on $H^2$ is even in the case of $mathbf P^1 times mathbf P^1$ but not in the other case.
â Asal Beag Dubh
Aug 8 at 14:51
@AsalBeagDubh : Dear Asal, many thanks for your comment ! I edited my answer.
â Nicolas Hemelsoet
Aug 8 at 19:40
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
You can look at the cohomology ring structure.
More precisely, $H^2(Bbb P^1 times Bbb P^1, Bbb Z)$ is generated by $[L]$ and $[L']$, where $L = 1 times Bbb P^1$ and $L' = Bbb P^1 times 1}$. We have $L^2 = (L')^2 = 0$ and $LL' = 1$. In particular, for any $C = aL + b L'$, $C^2$ is even, but $E^2 = -1$ when $E$ is the exceptional divisor of the blow-up, contradiction.
In fact there are pretty close because they can be both decomposed as $$(Bbb C^*)^2 cup Bbb C^* cup Bbb C^* cup Bbb C^* cup Bbb C^* cup pt cup pt cup pt cup pt$$ So they are equal in the Grothendieck ring of varieties, in particular have same Hodge numbers.
You can look at the cohomology ring structure.
More precisely, $H^2(Bbb P^1 times Bbb P^1, Bbb Z)$ is generated by $[L]$ and $[L']$, where $L = 1 times Bbb P^1$ and $L' = Bbb P^1 times 1}$. We have $L^2 = (L')^2 = 0$ and $LL' = 1$. In particular, for any $C = aL + b L'$, $C^2$ is even, but $E^2 = -1$ when $E$ is the exceptional divisor of the blow-up, contradiction.
In fact there are pretty close because they can be both decomposed as $$(Bbb C^*)^2 cup Bbb C^* cup Bbb C^* cup Bbb C^* cup Bbb C^* cup pt cup pt cup pt cup pt$$ So they are equal in the Grothendieck ring of varieties, in particular have same Hodge numbers.
edited Aug 8 at 19:44
answered Aug 7 at 19:31
Nicolas Hemelsoet
4,900316
4,900316
1
The first sentence is correct. However, the sentence starting "more precisely" is not completely convincing to me, because a (non-algebraic) diffeomorphism need not take effective curves to effective curves. An alternative argument would be to say that the intersection form on $H^2$ is even in the case of $mathbf P^1 times mathbf P^1$ but not in the other case.
â Asal Beag Dubh
Aug 8 at 14:51
@AsalBeagDubh : Dear Asal, many thanks for your comment ! I edited my answer.
â Nicolas Hemelsoet
Aug 8 at 19:40
add a comment |Â
1
The first sentence is correct. However, the sentence starting "more precisely" is not completely convincing to me, because a (non-algebraic) diffeomorphism need not take effective curves to effective curves. An alternative argument would be to say that the intersection form on $H^2$ is even in the case of $mathbf P^1 times mathbf P^1$ but not in the other case.
â Asal Beag Dubh
Aug 8 at 14:51
@AsalBeagDubh : Dear Asal, many thanks for your comment ! I edited my answer.
â Nicolas Hemelsoet
Aug 8 at 19:40
1
1
The first sentence is correct. However, the sentence starting "more precisely" is not completely convincing to me, because a (non-algebraic) diffeomorphism need not take effective curves to effective curves. An alternative argument would be to say that the intersection form on $H^2$ is even in the case of $mathbf P^1 times mathbf P^1$ but not in the other case.
â Asal Beag Dubh
Aug 8 at 14:51
The first sentence is correct. However, the sentence starting "more precisely" is not completely convincing to me, because a (non-algebraic) diffeomorphism need not take effective curves to effective curves. An alternative argument would be to say that the intersection form on $H^2$ is even in the case of $mathbf P^1 times mathbf P^1$ but not in the other case.
â Asal Beag Dubh
Aug 8 at 14:51
@AsalBeagDubh : Dear Asal, many thanks for your comment ! I edited my answer.
â Nicolas Hemelsoet
Aug 8 at 19:40
@AsalBeagDubh : Dear Asal, many thanks for your comment ! I edited my answer.
â Nicolas Hemelsoet
Aug 8 at 19:40
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
You can do this using Kirby calculus and diagrams. I'll not attempt to draw any diagrams, but since you already have two clearly articulated answers, I'll just leave this as an alternative method.
Both the spaces are $S^2$ bundles over $S^2$, and as such are characterised up to diffeomorphism by their mod 2 Euler numbers. The Kirby calculus for such objects is well understood and documented.
Each space has a handle decomposition with exactly two 2-handles. A Kirby diagram for $mathbbCP^1timesmathbbCP^1cong S^2times S^2$ consists of Hopf link of two $0$-framed unknots.
On the other hand a Kirby diagram of the blow up $mathbbCP^2#overlinemathbbCP^2$ consists of a pair of disjoint unkots, one with framing $+1$ and one with framing $-1$. Performing a handle slide of the $-1$-unknot over the other generates a Hopf link of a $1$-framed unknot and a $-1+1=0$-framed unkot.
Further handle slides can change the $(0,0)$-Hopf link of $S^2times S^2$ into a $(0,2n)$-framed Hopf link. Similarly, handle slides can change the $(0,1)$-framed Hopf link of $mathbbCP^2#overlinemathbbCP^2$ into a $(0,2n+1)$-framed Hopf link, but the difference of parity cannot be reconciled by any permitted Kirby moves.
Since the handle slide operation preserves the diffeomorphism type, it's clear now that the two spaces we started with are not diffeomorphic.
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
You can do this using Kirby calculus and diagrams. I'll not attempt to draw any diagrams, but since you already have two clearly articulated answers, I'll just leave this as an alternative method.
Both the spaces are $S^2$ bundles over $S^2$, and as such are characterised up to diffeomorphism by their mod 2 Euler numbers. The Kirby calculus for such objects is well understood and documented.
Each space has a handle decomposition with exactly two 2-handles. A Kirby diagram for $mathbbCP^1timesmathbbCP^1cong S^2times S^2$ consists of Hopf link of two $0$-framed unknots.
On the other hand a Kirby diagram of the blow up $mathbbCP^2#overlinemathbbCP^2$ consists of a pair of disjoint unkots, one with framing $+1$ and one with framing $-1$. Performing a handle slide of the $-1$-unknot over the other generates a Hopf link of a $1$-framed unknot and a $-1+1=0$-framed unkot.
Further handle slides can change the $(0,0)$-Hopf link of $S^2times S^2$ into a $(0,2n)$-framed Hopf link. Similarly, handle slides can change the $(0,1)$-framed Hopf link of $mathbbCP^2#overlinemathbbCP^2$ into a $(0,2n+1)$-framed Hopf link, but the difference of parity cannot be reconciled by any permitted Kirby moves.
Since the handle slide operation preserves the diffeomorphism type, it's clear now that the two spaces we started with are not diffeomorphic.
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
You can do this using Kirby calculus and diagrams. I'll not attempt to draw any diagrams, but since you already have two clearly articulated answers, I'll just leave this as an alternative method.
Both the spaces are $S^2$ bundles over $S^2$, and as such are characterised up to diffeomorphism by their mod 2 Euler numbers. The Kirby calculus for such objects is well understood and documented.
Each space has a handle decomposition with exactly two 2-handles. A Kirby diagram for $mathbbCP^1timesmathbbCP^1cong S^2times S^2$ consists of Hopf link of two $0$-framed unknots.
On the other hand a Kirby diagram of the blow up $mathbbCP^2#overlinemathbbCP^2$ consists of a pair of disjoint unkots, one with framing $+1$ and one with framing $-1$. Performing a handle slide of the $-1$-unknot over the other generates a Hopf link of a $1$-framed unknot and a $-1+1=0$-framed unkot.
Further handle slides can change the $(0,0)$-Hopf link of $S^2times S^2$ into a $(0,2n)$-framed Hopf link. Similarly, handle slides can change the $(0,1)$-framed Hopf link of $mathbbCP^2#overlinemathbbCP^2$ into a $(0,2n+1)$-framed Hopf link, but the difference of parity cannot be reconciled by any permitted Kirby moves.
Since the handle slide operation preserves the diffeomorphism type, it's clear now that the two spaces we started with are not diffeomorphic.
You can do this using Kirby calculus and diagrams. I'll not attempt to draw any diagrams, but since you already have two clearly articulated answers, I'll just leave this as an alternative method.
Both the spaces are $S^2$ bundles over $S^2$, and as such are characterised up to diffeomorphism by their mod 2 Euler numbers. The Kirby calculus for such objects is well understood and documented.
Each space has a handle decomposition with exactly two 2-handles. A Kirby diagram for $mathbbCP^1timesmathbbCP^1cong S^2times S^2$ consists of Hopf link of two $0$-framed unknots.
On the other hand a Kirby diagram of the blow up $mathbbCP^2#overlinemathbbCP^2$ consists of a pair of disjoint unkots, one with framing $+1$ and one with framing $-1$. Performing a handle slide of the $-1$-unknot over the other generates a Hopf link of a $1$-framed unknot and a $-1+1=0$-framed unkot.
Further handle slides can change the $(0,0)$-Hopf link of $S^2times S^2$ into a $(0,2n)$-framed Hopf link. Similarly, handle slides can change the $(0,1)$-framed Hopf link of $mathbbCP^2#overlinemathbbCP^2$ into a $(0,2n+1)$-framed Hopf link, but the difference of parity cannot be reconciled by any permitted Kirby moves.
Since the handle slide operation preserves the diffeomorphism type, it's clear now that the two spaces we started with are not diffeomorphic.
answered Aug 11 at 15:27
Tyrone
3,26611125
3,26611125
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
Topologically speaking, blowing up of $M$ at a point means you get $M'= M# barmathbb CP^2$. Signature
$sigma(mathbb CP^1times mathbb CP^1 # barmathbb CP^2)= -1$. Where as $sigma (mathbb CP^2# barmathbb CP^2)=0$. So they are not even homotopically equivalent.
Interesting fact is that if you blow up $mathbb CP^2$ in two points then $mathbb CP^2# 2barmathbb CP^2$ is actually diffeomorphic to $mathbb CP^1times mathbb CP^1 # barmathbb CP^2$.
*EDIT I misread your original question. The reason $mathbb CP^1times mathbb CP^1$ is not diffeomorphic with $mathbb CP^2# barmathbb CP^2$ is because they have different co-homology ring. One way to see that in both cases $H^2$ is generated by two copies of $[mathbb CP^1]$ namely $alpha$ and $beta$. But for the first case $alpha cup beta neq 0$ and $alpha cup alpha = beta cup beta =0$ follows from product formula. On the other case. i.e, $mathbb CP^2# barmathbb CP^2$, $alphacup beta =0$. And $alpha cup alpha neq 0$ and $beta cup beta neq 0$. Thus they have different cohomology ring.
Yeah, but I mean $CP^2$ blow up one point and $CP^1times CP^1$ :)
â User X
Aug 11 at 8:00
The co-homology ring of CP1 x CP1 is different from the other. Then the question become much easier. I read wrong and gave a solution
â Anubhav Mukherjee
Aug 11 at 14:48
If you consider two generator of H^2. In one case that is trivial where as on the other case that is non-trivial
â Anubhav Mukherjee
Aug 11 at 14:50
@UserX I have edited
â Anubhav Mukherjee
Aug 12 at 13:31
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
Topologically speaking, blowing up of $M$ at a point means you get $M'= M# barmathbb CP^2$. Signature
$sigma(mathbb CP^1times mathbb CP^1 # barmathbb CP^2)= -1$. Where as $sigma (mathbb CP^2# barmathbb CP^2)=0$. So they are not even homotopically equivalent.
Interesting fact is that if you blow up $mathbb CP^2$ in two points then $mathbb CP^2# 2barmathbb CP^2$ is actually diffeomorphic to $mathbb CP^1times mathbb CP^1 # barmathbb CP^2$.
*EDIT I misread your original question. The reason $mathbb CP^1times mathbb CP^1$ is not diffeomorphic with $mathbb CP^2# barmathbb CP^2$ is because they have different co-homology ring. One way to see that in both cases $H^2$ is generated by two copies of $[mathbb CP^1]$ namely $alpha$ and $beta$. But for the first case $alpha cup beta neq 0$ and $alpha cup alpha = beta cup beta =0$ follows from product formula. On the other case. i.e, $mathbb CP^2# barmathbb CP^2$, $alphacup beta =0$. And $alpha cup alpha neq 0$ and $beta cup beta neq 0$. Thus they have different cohomology ring.
Yeah, but I mean $CP^2$ blow up one point and $CP^1times CP^1$ :)
â User X
Aug 11 at 8:00
The co-homology ring of CP1 x CP1 is different from the other. Then the question become much easier. I read wrong and gave a solution
â Anubhav Mukherjee
Aug 11 at 14:48
If you consider two generator of H^2. In one case that is trivial where as on the other case that is non-trivial
â Anubhav Mukherjee
Aug 11 at 14:50
@UserX I have edited
â Anubhav Mukherjee
Aug 12 at 13:31
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
Topologically speaking, blowing up of $M$ at a point means you get $M'= M# barmathbb CP^2$. Signature
$sigma(mathbb CP^1times mathbb CP^1 # barmathbb CP^2)= -1$. Where as $sigma (mathbb CP^2# barmathbb CP^2)=0$. So they are not even homotopically equivalent.
Interesting fact is that if you blow up $mathbb CP^2$ in two points then $mathbb CP^2# 2barmathbb CP^2$ is actually diffeomorphic to $mathbb CP^1times mathbb CP^1 # barmathbb CP^2$.
*EDIT I misread your original question. The reason $mathbb CP^1times mathbb CP^1$ is not diffeomorphic with $mathbb CP^2# barmathbb CP^2$ is because they have different co-homology ring. One way to see that in both cases $H^2$ is generated by two copies of $[mathbb CP^1]$ namely $alpha$ and $beta$. But for the first case $alpha cup beta neq 0$ and $alpha cup alpha = beta cup beta =0$ follows from product formula. On the other case. i.e, $mathbb CP^2# barmathbb CP^2$, $alphacup beta =0$. And $alpha cup alpha neq 0$ and $beta cup beta neq 0$. Thus they have different cohomology ring.
Topologically speaking, blowing up of $M$ at a point means you get $M'= M# barmathbb CP^2$. Signature
$sigma(mathbb CP^1times mathbb CP^1 # barmathbb CP^2)= -1$. Where as $sigma (mathbb CP^2# barmathbb CP^2)=0$. So they are not even homotopically equivalent.
Interesting fact is that if you blow up $mathbb CP^2$ in two points then $mathbb CP^2# 2barmathbb CP^2$ is actually diffeomorphic to $mathbb CP^1times mathbb CP^1 # barmathbb CP^2$.
*EDIT I misread your original question. The reason $mathbb CP^1times mathbb CP^1$ is not diffeomorphic with $mathbb CP^2# barmathbb CP^2$ is because they have different co-homology ring. One way to see that in both cases $H^2$ is generated by two copies of $[mathbb CP^1]$ namely $alpha$ and $beta$. But for the first case $alpha cup beta neq 0$ and $alpha cup alpha = beta cup beta =0$ follows from product formula. On the other case. i.e, $mathbb CP^2# barmathbb CP^2$, $alphacup beta =0$. And $alpha cup alpha neq 0$ and $beta cup beta neq 0$. Thus they have different cohomology ring.
edited Aug 12 at 13:30
answered Aug 8 at 15:19
Anubhav Mukherjee
4,6411826
4,6411826
Yeah, but I mean $CP^2$ blow up one point and $CP^1times CP^1$ :)
â User X
Aug 11 at 8:00
The co-homology ring of CP1 x CP1 is different from the other. Then the question become much easier. I read wrong and gave a solution
â Anubhav Mukherjee
Aug 11 at 14:48
If you consider two generator of H^2. In one case that is trivial where as on the other case that is non-trivial
â Anubhav Mukherjee
Aug 11 at 14:50
@UserX I have edited
â Anubhav Mukherjee
Aug 12 at 13:31
add a comment |Â
Yeah, but I mean $CP^2$ blow up one point and $CP^1times CP^1$ :)
â User X
Aug 11 at 8:00
The co-homology ring of CP1 x CP1 is different from the other. Then the question become much easier. I read wrong and gave a solution
â Anubhav Mukherjee
Aug 11 at 14:48
If you consider two generator of H^2. In one case that is trivial where as on the other case that is non-trivial
â Anubhav Mukherjee
Aug 11 at 14:50
@UserX I have edited
â Anubhav Mukherjee
Aug 12 at 13:31
Yeah, but I mean $CP^2$ blow up one point and $CP^1times CP^1$ :)
â User X
Aug 11 at 8:00
Yeah, but I mean $CP^2$ blow up one point and $CP^1times CP^1$ :)
â User X
Aug 11 at 8:00
The co-homology ring of CP1 x CP1 is different from the other. Then the question become much easier. I read wrong and gave a solution
â Anubhav Mukherjee
Aug 11 at 14:48
The co-homology ring of CP1 x CP1 is different from the other. Then the question become much easier. I read wrong and gave a solution
â Anubhav Mukherjee
Aug 11 at 14:48
If you consider two generator of H^2. In one case that is trivial where as on the other case that is non-trivial
â Anubhav Mukherjee
Aug 11 at 14:50
If you consider two generator of H^2. In one case that is trivial where as on the other case that is non-trivial
â Anubhav Mukherjee
Aug 11 at 14:50
@UserX I have edited
â Anubhav Mukherjee
Aug 12 at 13:31
@UserX I have edited
â Anubhav Mukherjee
Aug 12 at 13:31
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2875303%2fhow-to-show-cp1-times-cp1-and-cp2-blow-up-one-point-are-not-diffeomorphic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password