How to show $CP^1times CP^1$ and $CP^2$ blow up one point are not diffeomorphic?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1












How can we prove $CP^1times CP^1$ and $CP^2$ blow up one point is not diffeomorphic?



I tried to compute their Hodge numbers and Chern numbers but they are the same.







share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    How can we prove $CP^1times CP^1$ and $CP^2$ blow up one point is not diffeomorphic?



    I tried to compute their Hodge numbers and Chern numbers but they are the same.







    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      How can we prove $CP^1times CP^1$ and $CP^2$ blow up one point is not diffeomorphic?



      I tried to compute their Hodge numbers and Chern numbers but they are the same.







      share|cite|improve this question













      How can we prove $CP^1times CP^1$ and $CP^2$ blow up one point is not diffeomorphic?



      I tried to compute their Hodge numbers and Chern numbers but they are the same.









      share|cite|improve this question












      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Aug 8 at 15:22









      Anubhav Mukherjee

      4,6411826




      4,6411826









      asked Aug 7 at 19:19









      User X

      918




      918




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted










          You can look at the cohomology ring structure.



          More precisely, $H^2(Bbb P^1 times Bbb P^1, Bbb Z)$ is generated by $[L]$ and $[L']$, where $L = 1 times Bbb P^1$ and $L' = Bbb P^1 times 1}$. We have $L^2 = (L')^2 = 0$ and $LL' = 1$. In particular, for any $C = aL + b L'$, $C^2$ is even, but $E^2 = -1$ when $E$ is the exceptional divisor of the blow-up, contradiction.



          In fact there are pretty close because they can be both decomposed as $$(Bbb C^*)^2 cup Bbb C^* cup Bbb C^* cup Bbb C^* cup Bbb C^* cup pt cup pt cup pt cup pt$$ So they are equal in the Grothendieck ring of varieties, in particular have same Hodge numbers.






          share|cite|improve this answer



















          • 1




            The first sentence is correct. However, the sentence starting "more precisely" is not completely convincing to me, because a (non-algebraic) diffeomorphism need not take effective curves to effective curves. An alternative argument would be to say that the intersection form on $H^2$ is even in the case of $mathbf P^1 times mathbf P^1$ but not in the other case.
            – Asal Beag Dubh
            Aug 8 at 14:51










          • @AsalBeagDubh : Dear Asal, many thanks for your comment ! I edited my answer.
            – Nicolas Hemelsoet
            Aug 8 at 19:40

















          up vote
          3
          down vote













          You can do this using Kirby calculus and diagrams. I'll not attempt to draw any diagrams, but since you already have two clearly articulated answers, I'll just leave this as an alternative method.



          Both the spaces are $S^2$ bundles over $S^2$, and as such are characterised up to diffeomorphism by their mod 2 Euler numbers. The Kirby calculus for such objects is well understood and documented.



          Each space has a handle decomposition with exactly two 2-handles. A Kirby diagram for $mathbbCP^1timesmathbbCP^1cong S^2times S^2$ consists of Hopf link of two $0$-framed unknots.



          On the other hand a Kirby diagram of the blow up $mathbbCP^2#overlinemathbbCP^2$ consists of a pair of disjoint unkots, one with framing $+1$ and one with framing $-1$. Performing a handle slide of the $-1$-unknot over the other generates a Hopf link of a $1$-framed unknot and a $-1+1=0$-framed unkot.



          Further handle slides can change the $(0,0)$-Hopf link of $S^2times S^2$ into a $(0,2n)$-framed Hopf link. Similarly, handle slides can change the $(0,1)$-framed Hopf link of $mathbbCP^2#overlinemathbbCP^2$ into a $(0,2n+1)$-framed Hopf link, but the difference of parity cannot be reconciled by any permitted Kirby moves.



          Since the handle slide operation preserves the diffeomorphism type, it's clear now that the two spaces we started with are not diffeomorphic.






          share|cite|improve this answer




























            up vote
            2
            down vote













            Topologically speaking, blowing up of $M$ at a point means you get $M'= M# barmathbb CP^2$. Signature



            $sigma(mathbb CP^1times mathbb CP^1 # barmathbb CP^2)= -1$. Where as $sigma (mathbb CP^2# barmathbb CP^2)=0$. So they are not even homotopically equivalent.



            Interesting fact is that if you blow up $mathbb CP^2$ in two points then $mathbb CP^2# 2barmathbb CP^2$ is actually diffeomorphic to $mathbb CP^1times mathbb CP^1 # barmathbb CP^2$.



            *EDIT I misread your original question. The reason $mathbb CP^1times mathbb CP^1$ is not diffeomorphic with $mathbb CP^2# barmathbb CP^2$ is because they have different co-homology ring. One way to see that in both cases $H^2$ is generated by two copies of $[mathbb CP^1]$ namely $alpha$ and $beta$. But for the first case $alpha cup beta neq 0$ and $alpha cup alpha = beta cup beta =0$ follows from product formula. On the other case. i.e, $mathbb CP^2# barmathbb CP^2$, $alphacup beta =0$. And $alpha cup alpha neq 0$ and $beta cup beta neq 0$. Thus they have different cohomology ring.






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • Yeah, but I mean $CP^2$ blow up one point and $CP^1times CP^1$ :)
              – User X
              Aug 11 at 8:00










            • The co-homology ring of CP1 x CP1 is different from the other. Then the question become much easier. I read wrong and gave a solution
              – Anubhav Mukherjee
              Aug 11 at 14:48










            • If you consider two generator of H^2. In one case that is trivial where as on the other case that is non-trivial
              – Anubhav Mukherjee
              Aug 11 at 14:50










            • @UserX I have edited
              – Anubhav Mukherjee
              Aug 12 at 13:31










            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );








             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2875303%2fhow-to-show-cp1-times-cp1-and-cp2-blow-up-one-point-are-not-diffeomorphic%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            3
            down vote



            accepted










            You can look at the cohomology ring structure.



            More precisely, $H^2(Bbb P^1 times Bbb P^1, Bbb Z)$ is generated by $[L]$ and $[L']$, where $L = 1 times Bbb P^1$ and $L' = Bbb P^1 times 1}$. We have $L^2 = (L')^2 = 0$ and $LL' = 1$. In particular, for any $C = aL + b L'$, $C^2$ is even, but $E^2 = -1$ when $E$ is the exceptional divisor of the blow-up, contradiction.



            In fact there are pretty close because they can be both decomposed as $$(Bbb C^*)^2 cup Bbb C^* cup Bbb C^* cup Bbb C^* cup Bbb C^* cup pt cup pt cup pt cup pt$$ So they are equal in the Grothendieck ring of varieties, in particular have same Hodge numbers.






            share|cite|improve this answer



















            • 1




              The first sentence is correct. However, the sentence starting "more precisely" is not completely convincing to me, because a (non-algebraic) diffeomorphism need not take effective curves to effective curves. An alternative argument would be to say that the intersection form on $H^2$ is even in the case of $mathbf P^1 times mathbf P^1$ but not in the other case.
              – Asal Beag Dubh
              Aug 8 at 14:51










            • @AsalBeagDubh : Dear Asal, many thanks for your comment ! I edited my answer.
              – Nicolas Hemelsoet
              Aug 8 at 19:40














            up vote
            3
            down vote



            accepted










            You can look at the cohomology ring structure.



            More precisely, $H^2(Bbb P^1 times Bbb P^1, Bbb Z)$ is generated by $[L]$ and $[L']$, where $L = 1 times Bbb P^1$ and $L' = Bbb P^1 times 1}$. We have $L^2 = (L')^2 = 0$ and $LL' = 1$. In particular, for any $C = aL + b L'$, $C^2$ is even, but $E^2 = -1$ when $E$ is the exceptional divisor of the blow-up, contradiction.



            In fact there are pretty close because they can be both decomposed as $$(Bbb C^*)^2 cup Bbb C^* cup Bbb C^* cup Bbb C^* cup Bbb C^* cup pt cup pt cup pt cup pt$$ So they are equal in the Grothendieck ring of varieties, in particular have same Hodge numbers.






            share|cite|improve this answer



















            • 1




              The first sentence is correct. However, the sentence starting "more precisely" is not completely convincing to me, because a (non-algebraic) diffeomorphism need not take effective curves to effective curves. An alternative argument would be to say that the intersection form on $H^2$ is even in the case of $mathbf P^1 times mathbf P^1$ but not in the other case.
              – Asal Beag Dubh
              Aug 8 at 14:51










            • @AsalBeagDubh : Dear Asal, many thanks for your comment ! I edited my answer.
              – Nicolas Hemelsoet
              Aug 8 at 19:40












            up vote
            3
            down vote



            accepted







            up vote
            3
            down vote



            accepted






            You can look at the cohomology ring structure.



            More precisely, $H^2(Bbb P^1 times Bbb P^1, Bbb Z)$ is generated by $[L]$ and $[L']$, where $L = 1 times Bbb P^1$ and $L' = Bbb P^1 times 1}$. We have $L^2 = (L')^2 = 0$ and $LL' = 1$. In particular, for any $C = aL + b L'$, $C^2$ is even, but $E^2 = -1$ when $E$ is the exceptional divisor of the blow-up, contradiction.



            In fact there are pretty close because they can be both decomposed as $$(Bbb C^*)^2 cup Bbb C^* cup Bbb C^* cup Bbb C^* cup Bbb C^* cup pt cup pt cup pt cup pt$$ So they are equal in the Grothendieck ring of varieties, in particular have same Hodge numbers.






            share|cite|improve this answer















            You can look at the cohomology ring structure.



            More precisely, $H^2(Bbb P^1 times Bbb P^1, Bbb Z)$ is generated by $[L]$ and $[L']$, where $L = 1 times Bbb P^1$ and $L' = Bbb P^1 times 1}$. We have $L^2 = (L')^2 = 0$ and $LL' = 1$. In particular, for any $C = aL + b L'$, $C^2$ is even, but $E^2 = -1$ when $E$ is the exceptional divisor of the blow-up, contradiction.



            In fact there are pretty close because they can be both decomposed as $$(Bbb C^*)^2 cup Bbb C^* cup Bbb C^* cup Bbb C^* cup Bbb C^* cup pt cup pt cup pt cup pt$$ So they are equal in the Grothendieck ring of varieties, in particular have same Hodge numbers.







            share|cite|improve this answer















            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Aug 8 at 19:44


























            answered Aug 7 at 19:31









            Nicolas Hemelsoet

            4,900316




            4,900316







            • 1




              The first sentence is correct. However, the sentence starting "more precisely" is not completely convincing to me, because a (non-algebraic) diffeomorphism need not take effective curves to effective curves. An alternative argument would be to say that the intersection form on $H^2$ is even in the case of $mathbf P^1 times mathbf P^1$ but not in the other case.
              – Asal Beag Dubh
              Aug 8 at 14:51










            • @AsalBeagDubh : Dear Asal, many thanks for your comment ! I edited my answer.
              – Nicolas Hemelsoet
              Aug 8 at 19:40












            • 1




              The first sentence is correct. However, the sentence starting "more precisely" is not completely convincing to me, because a (non-algebraic) diffeomorphism need not take effective curves to effective curves. An alternative argument would be to say that the intersection form on $H^2$ is even in the case of $mathbf P^1 times mathbf P^1$ but not in the other case.
              – Asal Beag Dubh
              Aug 8 at 14:51










            • @AsalBeagDubh : Dear Asal, many thanks for your comment ! I edited my answer.
              – Nicolas Hemelsoet
              Aug 8 at 19:40







            1




            1




            The first sentence is correct. However, the sentence starting "more precisely" is not completely convincing to me, because a (non-algebraic) diffeomorphism need not take effective curves to effective curves. An alternative argument would be to say that the intersection form on $H^2$ is even in the case of $mathbf P^1 times mathbf P^1$ but not in the other case.
            – Asal Beag Dubh
            Aug 8 at 14:51




            The first sentence is correct. However, the sentence starting "more precisely" is not completely convincing to me, because a (non-algebraic) diffeomorphism need not take effective curves to effective curves. An alternative argument would be to say that the intersection form on $H^2$ is even in the case of $mathbf P^1 times mathbf P^1$ but not in the other case.
            – Asal Beag Dubh
            Aug 8 at 14:51












            @AsalBeagDubh : Dear Asal, many thanks for your comment ! I edited my answer.
            – Nicolas Hemelsoet
            Aug 8 at 19:40




            @AsalBeagDubh : Dear Asal, many thanks for your comment ! I edited my answer.
            – Nicolas Hemelsoet
            Aug 8 at 19:40










            up vote
            3
            down vote













            You can do this using Kirby calculus and diagrams. I'll not attempt to draw any diagrams, but since you already have two clearly articulated answers, I'll just leave this as an alternative method.



            Both the spaces are $S^2$ bundles over $S^2$, and as such are characterised up to diffeomorphism by their mod 2 Euler numbers. The Kirby calculus for such objects is well understood and documented.



            Each space has a handle decomposition with exactly two 2-handles. A Kirby diagram for $mathbbCP^1timesmathbbCP^1cong S^2times S^2$ consists of Hopf link of two $0$-framed unknots.



            On the other hand a Kirby diagram of the blow up $mathbbCP^2#overlinemathbbCP^2$ consists of a pair of disjoint unkots, one with framing $+1$ and one with framing $-1$. Performing a handle slide of the $-1$-unknot over the other generates a Hopf link of a $1$-framed unknot and a $-1+1=0$-framed unkot.



            Further handle slides can change the $(0,0)$-Hopf link of $S^2times S^2$ into a $(0,2n)$-framed Hopf link. Similarly, handle slides can change the $(0,1)$-framed Hopf link of $mathbbCP^2#overlinemathbbCP^2$ into a $(0,2n+1)$-framed Hopf link, but the difference of parity cannot be reconciled by any permitted Kirby moves.



            Since the handle slide operation preserves the diffeomorphism type, it's clear now that the two spaces we started with are not diffeomorphic.






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              3
              down vote













              You can do this using Kirby calculus and diagrams. I'll not attempt to draw any diagrams, but since you already have two clearly articulated answers, I'll just leave this as an alternative method.



              Both the spaces are $S^2$ bundles over $S^2$, and as such are characterised up to diffeomorphism by their mod 2 Euler numbers. The Kirby calculus for such objects is well understood and documented.



              Each space has a handle decomposition with exactly two 2-handles. A Kirby diagram for $mathbbCP^1timesmathbbCP^1cong S^2times S^2$ consists of Hopf link of two $0$-framed unknots.



              On the other hand a Kirby diagram of the blow up $mathbbCP^2#overlinemathbbCP^2$ consists of a pair of disjoint unkots, one with framing $+1$ and one with framing $-1$. Performing a handle slide of the $-1$-unknot over the other generates a Hopf link of a $1$-framed unknot and a $-1+1=0$-framed unkot.



              Further handle slides can change the $(0,0)$-Hopf link of $S^2times S^2$ into a $(0,2n)$-framed Hopf link. Similarly, handle slides can change the $(0,1)$-framed Hopf link of $mathbbCP^2#overlinemathbbCP^2$ into a $(0,2n+1)$-framed Hopf link, but the difference of parity cannot be reconciled by any permitted Kirby moves.



              Since the handle slide operation preserves the diffeomorphism type, it's clear now that the two spaces we started with are not diffeomorphic.






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                3
                down vote










                up vote
                3
                down vote









                You can do this using Kirby calculus and diagrams. I'll not attempt to draw any diagrams, but since you already have two clearly articulated answers, I'll just leave this as an alternative method.



                Both the spaces are $S^2$ bundles over $S^2$, and as such are characterised up to diffeomorphism by their mod 2 Euler numbers. The Kirby calculus for such objects is well understood and documented.



                Each space has a handle decomposition with exactly two 2-handles. A Kirby diagram for $mathbbCP^1timesmathbbCP^1cong S^2times S^2$ consists of Hopf link of two $0$-framed unknots.



                On the other hand a Kirby diagram of the blow up $mathbbCP^2#overlinemathbbCP^2$ consists of a pair of disjoint unkots, one with framing $+1$ and one with framing $-1$. Performing a handle slide of the $-1$-unknot over the other generates a Hopf link of a $1$-framed unknot and a $-1+1=0$-framed unkot.



                Further handle slides can change the $(0,0)$-Hopf link of $S^2times S^2$ into a $(0,2n)$-framed Hopf link. Similarly, handle slides can change the $(0,1)$-framed Hopf link of $mathbbCP^2#overlinemathbbCP^2$ into a $(0,2n+1)$-framed Hopf link, but the difference of parity cannot be reconciled by any permitted Kirby moves.



                Since the handle slide operation preserves the diffeomorphism type, it's clear now that the two spaces we started with are not diffeomorphic.






                share|cite|improve this answer













                You can do this using Kirby calculus and diagrams. I'll not attempt to draw any diagrams, but since you already have two clearly articulated answers, I'll just leave this as an alternative method.



                Both the spaces are $S^2$ bundles over $S^2$, and as such are characterised up to diffeomorphism by their mod 2 Euler numbers. The Kirby calculus for such objects is well understood and documented.



                Each space has a handle decomposition with exactly two 2-handles. A Kirby diagram for $mathbbCP^1timesmathbbCP^1cong S^2times S^2$ consists of Hopf link of two $0$-framed unknots.



                On the other hand a Kirby diagram of the blow up $mathbbCP^2#overlinemathbbCP^2$ consists of a pair of disjoint unkots, one with framing $+1$ and one with framing $-1$. Performing a handle slide of the $-1$-unknot over the other generates a Hopf link of a $1$-framed unknot and a $-1+1=0$-framed unkot.



                Further handle slides can change the $(0,0)$-Hopf link of $S^2times S^2$ into a $(0,2n)$-framed Hopf link. Similarly, handle slides can change the $(0,1)$-framed Hopf link of $mathbbCP^2#overlinemathbbCP^2$ into a $(0,2n+1)$-framed Hopf link, but the difference of parity cannot be reconciled by any permitted Kirby moves.



                Since the handle slide operation preserves the diffeomorphism type, it's clear now that the two spaces we started with are not diffeomorphic.







                share|cite|improve this answer













                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer











                answered Aug 11 at 15:27









                Tyrone

                3,26611125




                3,26611125




















                    up vote
                    2
                    down vote













                    Topologically speaking, blowing up of $M$ at a point means you get $M'= M# barmathbb CP^2$. Signature



                    $sigma(mathbb CP^1times mathbb CP^1 # barmathbb CP^2)= -1$. Where as $sigma (mathbb CP^2# barmathbb CP^2)=0$. So they are not even homotopically equivalent.



                    Interesting fact is that if you blow up $mathbb CP^2$ in two points then $mathbb CP^2# 2barmathbb CP^2$ is actually diffeomorphic to $mathbb CP^1times mathbb CP^1 # barmathbb CP^2$.



                    *EDIT I misread your original question. The reason $mathbb CP^1times mathbb CP^1$ is not diffeomorphic with $mathbb CP^2# barmathbb CP^2$ is because they have different co-homology ring. One way to see that in both cases $H^2$ is generated by two copies of $[mathbb CP^1]$ namely $alpha$ and $beta$. But for the first case $alpha cup beta neq 0$ and $alpha cup alpha = beta cup beta =0$ follows from product formula. On the other case. i.e, $mathbb CP^2# barmathbb CP^2$, $alphacup beta =0$. And $alpha cup alpha neq 0$ and $beta cup beta neq 0$. Thus they have different cohomology ring.






                    share|cite|improve this answer























                    • Yeah, but I mean $CP^2$ blow up one point and $CP^1times CP^1$ :)
                      – User X
                      Aug 11 at 8:00










                    • The co-homology ring of CP1 x CP1 is different from the other. Then the question become much easier. I read wrong and gave a solution
                      – Anubhav Mukherjee
                      Aug 11 at 14:48










                    • If you consider two generator of H^2. In one case that is trivial where as on the other case that is non-trivial
                      – Anubhav Mukherjee
                      Aug 11 at 14:50










                    • @UserX I have edited
                      – Anubhav Mukherjee
                      Aug 12 at 13:31














                    up vote
                    2
                    down vote













                    Topologically speaking, blowing up of $M$ at a point means you get $M'= M# barmathbb CP^2$. Signature



                    $sigma(mathbb CP^1times mathbb CP^1 # barmathbb CP^2)= -1$. Where as $sigma (mathbb CP^2# barmathbb CP^2)=0$. So they are not even homotopically equivalent.



                    Interesting fact is that if you blow up $mathbb CP^2$ in two points then $mathbb CP^2# 2barmathbb CP^2$ is actually diffeomorphic to $mathbb CP^1times mathbb CP^1 # barmathbb CP^2$.



                    *EDIT I misread your original question. The reason $mathbb CP^1times mathbb CP^1$ is not diffeomorphic with $mathbb CP^2# barmathbb CP^2$ is because they have different co-homology ring. One way to see that in both cases $H^2$ is generated by two copies of $[mathbb CP^1]$ namely $alpha$ and $beta$. But for the first case $alpha cup beta neq 0$ and $alpha cup alpha = beta cup beta =0$ follows from product formula. On the other case. i.e, $mathbb CP^2# barmathbb CP^2$, $alphacup beta =0$. And $alpha cup alpha neq 0$ and $beta cup beta neq 0$. Thus they have different cohomology ring.






                    share|cite|improve this answer























                    • Yeah, but I mean $CP^2$ blow up one point and $CP^1times CP^1$ :)
                      – User X
                      Aug 11 at 8:00










                    • The co-homology ring of CP1 x CP1 is different from the other. Then the question become much easier. I read wrong and gave a solution
                      – Anubhav Mukherjee
                      Aug 11 at 14:48










                    • If you consider two generator of H^2. In one case that is trivial where as on the other case that is non-trivial
                      – Anubhav Mukherjee
                      Aug 11 at 14:50










                    • @UserX I have edited
                      – Anubhav Mukherjee
                      Aug 12 at 13:31












                    up vote
                    2
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    2
                    down vote









                    Topologically speaking, blowing up of $M$ at a point means you get $M'= M# barmathbb CP^2$. Signature



                    $sigma(mathbb CP^1times mathbb CP^1 # barmathbb CP^2)= -1$. Where as $sigma (mathbb CP^2# barmathbb CP^2)=0$. So they are not even homotopically equivalent.



                    Interesting fact is that if you blow up $mathbb CP^2$ in two points then $mathbb CP^2# 2barmathbb CP^2$ is actually diffeomorphic to $mathbb CP^1times mathbb CP^1 # barmathbb CP^2$.



                    *EDIT I misread your original question. The reason $mathbb CP^1times mathbb CP^1$ is not diffeomorphic with $mathbb CP^2# barmathbb CP^2$ is because they have different co-homology ring. One way to see that in both cases $H^2$ is generated by two copies of $[mathbb CP^1]$ namely $alpha$ and $beta$. But for the first case $alpha cup beta neq 0$ and $alpha cup alpha = beta cup beta =0$ follows from product formula. On the other case. i.e, $mathbb CP^2# barmathbb CP^2$, $alphacup beta =0$. And $alpha cup alpha neq 0$ and $beta cup beta neq 0$. Thus they have different cohomology ring.






                    share|cite|improve this answer















                    Topologically speaking, blowing up of $M$ at a point means you get $M'= M# barmathbb CP^2$. Signature



                    $sigma(mathbb CP^1times mathbb CP^1 # barmathbb CP^2)= -1$. Where as $sigma (mathbb CP^2# barmathbb CP^2)=0$. So they are not even homotopically equivalent.



                    Interesting fact is that if you blow up $mathbb CP^2$ in two points then $mathbb CP^2# 2barmathbb CP^2$ is actually diffeomorphic to $mathbb CP^1times mathbb CP^1 # barmathbb CP^2$.



                    *EDIT I misread your original question. The reason $mathbb CP^1times mathbb CP^1$ is not diffeomorphic with $mathbb CP^2# barmathbb CP^2$ is because they have different co-homology ring. One way to see that in both cases $H^2$ is generated by two copies of $[mathbb CP^1]$ namely $alpha$ and $beta$. But for the first case $alpha cup beta neq 0$ and $alpha cup alpha = beta cup beta =0$ follows from product formula. On the other case. i.e, $mathbb CP^2# barmathbb CP^2$, $alphacup beta =0$. And $alpha cup alpha neq 0$ and $beta cup beta neq 0$. Thus they have different cohomology ring.







                    share|cite|improve this answer















                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited Aug 12 at 13:30


























                    answered Aug 8 at 15:19









                    Anubhav Mukherjee

                    4,6411826




                    4,6411826











                    • Yeah, but I mean $CP^2$ blow up one point and $CP^1times CP^1$ :)
                      – User X
                      Aug 11 at 8:00










                    • The co-homology ring of CP1 x CP1 is different from the other. Then the question become much easier. I read wrong and gave a solution
                      – Anubhav Mukherjee
                      Aug 11 at 14:48










                    • If you consider two generator of H^2. In one case that is trivial where as on the other case that is non-trivial
                      – Anubhav Mukherjee
                      Aug 11 at 14:50










                    • @UserX I have edited
                      – Anubhav Mukherjee
                      Aug 12 at 13:31
















                    • Yeah, but I mean $CP^2$ blow up one point and $CP^1times CP^1$ :)
                      – User X
                      Aug 11 at 8:00










                    • The co-homology ring of CP1 x CP1 is different from the other. Then the question become much easier. I read wrong and gave a solution
                      – Anubhav Mukherjee
                      Aug 11 at 14:48










                    • If you consider two generator of H^2. In one case that is trivial where as on the other case that is non-trivial
                      – Anubhav Mukherjee
                      Aug 11 at 14:50










                    • @UserX I have edited
                      – Anubhav Mukherjee
                      Aug 12 at 13:31















                    Yeah, but I mean $CP^2$ blow up one point and $CP^1times CP^1$ :)
                    – User X
                    Aug 11 at 8:00




                    Yeah, but I mean $CP^2$ blow up one point and $CP^1times CP^1$ :)
                    – User X
                    Aug 11 at 8:00












                    The co-homology ring of CP1 x CP1 is different from the other. Then the question become much easier. I read wrong and gave a solution
                    – Anubhav Mukherjee
                    Aug 11 at 14:48




                    The co-homology ring of CP1 x CP1 is different from the other. Then the question become much easier. I read wrong and gave a solution
                    – Anubhav Mukherjee
                    Aug 11 at 14:48












                    If you consider two generator of H^2. In one case that is trivial where as on the other case that is non-trivial
                    – Anubhav Mukherjee
                    Aug 11 at 14:50




                    If you consider two generator of H^2. In one case that is trivial where as on the other case that is non-trivial
                    – Anubhav Mukherjee
                    Aug 11 at 14:50












                    @UserX I have edited
                    – Anubhav Mukherjee
                    Aug 12 at 13:31




                    @UserX I have edited
                    – Anubhav Mukherjee
                    Aug 12 at 13:31












                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded


























                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2875303%2fhow-to-show-cp1-times-cp1-and-cp2-blow-up-one-point-are-not-diffeomorphic%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    這個網誌中的熱門文章

                    How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

                    Mutual Information Always Non-negative

                    Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?