Find a finite union $U$ of open intervals

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1












I want to prove the following: If $f$ is a bounded function on $[0,2pi]$ and $Asubset[0,2pi]$ a measurable set, then $forallepsilon>0$ $exists$ a finite union $U$ of open intervals s.t. $|int_Uf-int_Af|<epsilon$.



I have difficulties to show, that there is a $U$ which has such a form. I considered two cases:



  1. If $(0,pi)subset Asubset[0,pi]$, take $U=(0,2pi)$, then $mu(Asetminus U)=0$ and I can show the claim. (I even don't need that $f$ is bounded for this case?)

  2. In the other case, I know that $foralldelta>0 exists Usubset[0,2pi]$ open s.t. $Asubset U$ and $mu(Usetminus A)<delta$ because $A$ is measurable. If I take $delta=epsilon/M$ (where $M$ is the bound of $f$) I can show the claim for this $U$. But in general this is an arbitrary union of open intervals? How can I find a finite one?






share|cite|improve this question























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    I want to prove the following: If $f$ is a bounded function on $[0,2pi]$ and $Asubset[0,2pi]$ a measurable set, then $forallepsilon>0$ $exists$ a finite union $U$ of open intervals s.t. $|int_Uf-int_Af|<epsilon$.



    I have difficulties to show, that there is a $U$ which has such a form. I considered two cases:



    1. If $(0,pi)subset Asubset[0,pi]$, take $U=(0,2pi)$, then $mu(Asetminus U)=0$ and I can show the claim. (I even don't need that $f$ is bounded for this case?)

    2. In the other case, I know that $foralldelta>0 exists Usubset[0,2pi]$ open s.t. $Asubset U$ and $mu(Usetminus A)<delta$ because $A$ is measurable. If I take $delta=epsilon/M$ (where $M$ is the bound of $f$) I can show the claim for this $U$. But in general this is an arbitrary union of open intervals? How can I find a finite one?






    share|cite|improve this question





















      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      I want to prove the following: If $f$ is a bounded function on $[0,2pi]$ and $Asubset[0,2pi]$ a measurable set, then $forallepsilon>0$ $exists$ a finite union $U$ of open intervals s.t. $|int_Uf-int_Af|<epsilon$.



      I have difficulties to show, that there is a $U$ which has such a form. I considered two cases:



      1. If $(0,pi)subset Asubset[0,pi]$, take $U=(0,2pi)$, then $mu(Asetminus U)=0$ and I can show the claim. (I even don't need that $f$ is bounded for this case?)

      2. In the other case, I know that $foralldelta>0 exists Usubset[0,2pi]$ open s.t. $Asubset U$ and $mu(Usetminus A)<delta$ because $A$ is measurable. If I take $delta=epsilon/M$ (where $M$ is the bound of $f$) I can show the claim for this $U$. But in general this is an arbitrary union of open intervals? How can I find a finite one?






      share|cite|improve this question











      I want to prove the following: If $f$ is a bounded function on $[0,2pi]$ and $Asubset[0,2pi]$ a measurable set, then $forallepsilon>0$ $exists$ a finite union $U$ of open intervals s.t. $|int_Uf-int_Af|<epsilon$.



      I have difficulties to show, that there is a $U$ which has such a form. I considered two cases:



      1. If $(0,pi)subset Asubset[0,pi]$, take $U=(0,2pi)$, then $mu(Asetminus U)=0$ and I can show the claim. (I even don't need that $f$ is bounded for this case?)

      2. In the other case, I know that $foralldelta>0 exists Usubset[0,2pi]$ open s.t. $Asubset U$ and $mu(Usetminus A)<delta$ because $A$ is measurable. If I take $delta=epsilon/M$ (where $M$ is the bound of $f$) I can show the claim for this $U$. But in general this is an arbitrary union of open intervals? How can I find a finite one?








      share|cite|improve this question










      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question









      asked Aug 7 at 15:13









      mathstackuser

      61011




      61011




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          It seems to me that it would be easier to show this by regularity of the Lebesgue measure $lambda$. You know that since $f$ is bounded, that there exists $delta>0$ such that if $lambda(E)<delta$ then $int_E vert fvert< frac14 epsilon$. By regularity there exists a closed subset $Fsubseteq A$ such that $lambda(Asetminus F)< fracdelta2 $. $F$ is a compact set, hence for the open cover $ (x-fracdelta2),x+fracdelta2 _xin F $, there exists a finite subcover of open intervals, and define it's union $U$. The measure of $UDelta A$ will be less than $delta$, hence by the triangle inequality you will obtain what you need.



          Approximating $A$ by a closed subset (which is also compact) is the additional step you need.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • +1...Based on some or the Q's I've seen on this site, there seems to be a modern teaching style in measure theory that avoids inner regularity and inner measure.
            – DanielWainfleet
            Aug 8 at 2:13











          • I still have some questions to your answer: How can I see, that $Usubset [0,2pi]$? and how can I proceed with the triangle equality? I have difficulties to express $|int_Uf-int_Af|$ in terms of the symmetric difference
            – mathstackuser
            Aug 10 at 8:01











          • $U$ is not necessarily a subset of $[0,2pi]$ but $A$ could be $[0,2pi]$ and the for this case $F=A$, and every open cover of $A$ would strictly contain $[0,2pi]$. But you can extend $f$ to a bounded function on $mathbbR$ by $tildef=fcdot chi_[0,2pi]$.
            – Keen-ameteur
            Aug 11 at 8:06











          • We can write: $vert int_Utildef-int_A tildefvert=Bigvert -int_Asetminus U tildef+int_Usetminus Atilde fBigvert leq int_UDelta A vert tildefvert oversetlambda(UDelta A)<delta<epsilon$.
            – Keen-ameteur
            Aug 11 at 8:11











          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2875079%2ffind-a-finite-union-u-of-open-intervals%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          1
          down vote













          It seems to me that it would be easier to show this by regularity of the Lebesgue measure $lambda$. You know that since $f$ is bounded, that there exists $delta>0$ such that if $lambda(E)<delta$ then $int_E vert fvert< frac14 epsilon$. By regularity there exists a closed subset $Fsubseteq A$ such that $lambda(Asetminus F)< fracdelta2 $. $F$ is a compact set, hence for the open cover $ (x-fracdelta2),x+fracdelta2 _xin F $, there exists a finite subcover of open intervals, and define it's union $U$. The measure of $UDelta A$ will be less than $delta$, hence by the triangle inequality you will obtain what you need.



          Approximating $A$ by a closed subset (which is also compact) is the additional step you need.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • +1...Based on some or the Q's I've seen on this site, there seems to be a modern teaching style in measure theory that avoids inner regularity and inner measure.
            – DanielWainfleet
            Aug 8 at 2:13











          • I still have some questions to your answer: How can I see, that $Usubset [0,2pi]$? and how can I proceed with the triangle equality? I have difficulties to express $|int_Uf-int_Af|$ in terms of the symmetric difference
            – mathstackuser
            Aug 10 at 8:01











          • $U$ is not necessarily a subset of $[0,2pi]$ but $A$ could be $[0,2pi]$ and the for this case $F=A$, and every open cover of $A$ would strictly contain $[0,2pi]$. But you can extend $f$ to a bounded function on $mathbbR$ by $tildef=fcdot chi_[0,2pi]$.
            – Keen-ameteur
            Aug 11 at 8:06











          • We can write: $vert int_Utildef-int_A tildefvert=Bigvert -int_Asetminus U tildef+int_Usetminus Atilde fBigvert leq int_UDelta A vert tildefvert oversetlambda(UDelta A)<delta<epsilon$.
            – Keen-ameteur
            Aug 11 at 8:11















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          It seems to me that it would be easier to show this by regularity of the Lebesgue measure $lambda$. You know that since $f$ is bounded, that there exists $delta>0$ such that if $lambda(E)<delta$ then $int_E vert fvert< frac14 epsilon$. By regularity there exists a closed subset $Fsubseteq A$ such that $lambda(Asetminus F)< fracdelta2 $. $F$ is a compact set, hence for the open cover $ (x-fracdelta2),x+fracdelta2 _xin F $, there exists a finite subcover of open intervals, and define it's union $U$. The measure of $UDelta A$ will be less than $delta$, hence by the triangle inequality you will obtain what you need.



          Approximating $A$ by a closed subset (which is also compact) is the additional step you need.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • +1...Based on some or the Q's I've seen on this site, there seems to be a modern teaching style in measure theory that avoids inner regularity and inner measure.
            – DanielWainfleet
            Aug 8 at 2:13











          • I still have some questions to your answer: How can I see, that $Usubset [0,2pi]$? and how can I proceed with the triangle equality? I have difficulties to express $|int_Uf-int_Af|$ in terms of the symmetric difference
            – mathstackuser
            Aug 10 at 8:01











          • $U$ is not necessarily a subset of $[0,2pi]$ but $A$ could be $[0,2pi]$ and the for this case $F=A$, and every open cover of $A$ would strictly contain $[0,2pi]$. But you can extend $f$ to a bounded function on $mathbbR$ by $tildef=fcdot chi_[0,2pi]$.
            – Keen-ameteur
            Aug 11 at 8:06











          • We can write: $vert int_Utildef-int_A tildefvert=Bigvert -int_Asetminus U tildef+int_Usetminus Atilde fBigvert leq int_UDelta A vert tildefvert oversetlambda(UDelta A)<delta<epsilon$.
            – Keen-ameteur
            Aug 11 at 8:11













          up vote
          1
          down vote










          up vote
          1
          down vote









          It seems to me that it would be easier to show this by regularity of the Lebesgue measure $lambda$. You know that since $f$ is bounded, that there exists $delta>0$ such that if $lambda(E)<delta$ then $int_E vert fvert< frac14 epsilon$. By regularity there exists a closed subset $Fsubseteq A$ such that $lambda(Asetminus F)< fracdelta2 $. $F$ is a compact set, hence for the open cover $ (x-fracdelta2),x+fracdelta2 _xin F $, there exists a finite subcover of open intervals, and define it's union $U$. The measure of $UDelta A$ will be less than $delta$, hence by the triangle inequality you will obtain what you need.



          Approximating $A$ by a closed subset (which is also compact) is the additional step you need.






          share|cite|improve this answer













          It seems to me that it would be easier to show this by regularity of the Lebesgue measure $lambda$. You know that since $f$ is bounded, that there exists $delta>0$ such that if $lambda(E)<delta$ then $int_E vert fvert< frac14 epsilon$. By regularity there exists a closed subset $Fsubseteq A$ such that $lambda(Asetminus F)< fracdelta2 $. $F$ is a compact set, hence for the open cover $ (x-fracdelta2),x+fracdelta2 _xin F $, there exists a finite subcover of open intervals, and define it's union $U$. The measure of $UDelta A$ will be less than $delta$, hence by the triangle inequality you will obtain what you need.



          Approximating $A$ by a closed subset (which is also compact) is the additional step you need.







          share|cite|improve this answer













          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer











          answered Aug 7 at 15:32









          Keen-ameteur

          644213




          644213











          • +1...Based on some or the Q's I've seen on this site, there seems to be a modern teaching style in measure theory that avoids inner regularity and inner measure.
            – DanielWainfleet
            Aug 8 at 2:13











          • I still have some questions to your answer: How can I see, that $Usubset [0,2pi]$? and how can I proceed with the triangle equality? I have difficulties to express $|int_Uf-int_Af|$ in terms of the symmetric difference
            – mathstackuser
            Aug 10 at 8:01











          • $U$ is not necessarily a subset of $[0,2pi]$ but $A$ could be $[0,2pi]$ and the for this case $F=A$, and every open cover of $A$ would strictly contain $[0,2pi]$. But you can extend $f$ to a bounded function on $mathbbR$ by $tildef=fcdot chi_[0,2pi]$.
            – Keen-ameteur
            Aug 11 at 8:06











          • We can write: $vert int_Utildef-int_A tildefvert=Bigvert -int_Asetminus U tildef+int_Usetminus Atilde fBigvert leq int_UDelta A vert tildefvert oversetlambda(UDelta A)<delta<epsilon$.
            – Keen-ameteur
            Aug 11 at 8:11

















          • +1...Based on some or the Q's I've seen on this site, there seems to be a modern teaching style in measure theory that avoids inner regularity and inner measure.
            – DanielWainfleet
            Aug 8 at 2:13











          • I still have some questions to your answer: How can I see, that $Usubset [0,2pi]$? and how can I proceed with the triangle equality? I have difficulties to express $|int_Uf-int_Af|$ in terms of the symmetric difference
            – mathstackuser
            Aug 10 at 8:01











          • $U$ is not necessarily a subset of $[0,2pi]$ but $A$ could be $[0,2pi]$ and the for this case $F=A$, and every open cover of $A$ would strictly contain $[0,2pi]$. But you can extend $f$ to a bounded function on $mathbbR$ by $tildef=fcdot chi_[0,2pi]$.
            – Keen-ameteur
            Aug 11 at 8:06











          • We can write: $vert int_Utildef-int_A tildefvert=Bigvert -int_Asetminus U tildef+int_Usetminus Atilde fBigvert leq int_UDelta A vert tildefvert oversetlambda(UDelta A)<delta<epsilon$.
            – Keen-ameteur
            Aug 11 at 8:11
















          +1...Based on some or the Q's I've seen on this site, there seems to be a modern teaching style in measure theory that avoids inner regularity and inner measure.
          – DanielWainfleet
          Aug 8 at 2:13





          +1...Based on some or the Q's I've seen on this site, there seems to be a modern teaching style in measure theory that avoids inner regularity and inner measure.
          – DanielWainfleet
          Aug 8 at 2:13













          I still have some questions to your answer: How can I see, that $Usubset [0,2pi]$? and how can I proceed with the triangle equality? I have difficulties to express $|int_Uf-int_Af|$ in terms of the symmetric difference
          – mathstackuser
          Aug 10 at 8:01





          I still have some questions to your answer: How can I see, that $Usubset [0,2pi]$? and how can I proceed with the triangle equality? I have difficulties to express $|int_Uf-int_Af|$ in terms of the symmetric difference
          – mathstackuser
          Aug 10 at 8:01













          $U$ is not necessarily a subset of $[0,2pi]$ but $A$ could be $[0,2pi]$ and the for this case $F=A$, and every open cover of $A$ would strictly contain $[0,2pi]$. But you can extend $f$ to a bounded function on $mathbbR$ by $tildef=fcdot chi_[0,2pi]$.
          – Keen-ameteur
          Aug 11 at 8:06





          $U$ is not necessarily a subset of $[0,2pi]$ but $A$ could be $[0,2pi]$ and the for this case $F=A$, and every open cover of $A$ would strictly contain $[0,2pi]$. But you can extend $f$ to a bounded function on $mathbbR$ by $tildef=fcdot chi_[0,2pi]$.
          – Keen-ameteur
          Aug 11 at 8:06













          We can write: $vert int_Utildef-int_A tildefvert=Bigvert -int_Asetminus U tildef+int_Usetminus Atilde fBigvert leq int_UDelta A vert tildefvert oversetlambda(UDelta A)<delta<epsilon$.
          – Keen-ameteur
          Aug 11 at 8:11





          We can write: $vert int_Utildef-int_A tildefvert=Bigvert -int_Asetminus U tildef+int_Usetminus Atilde fBigvert leq int_UDelta A vert tildefvert oversetlambda(UDelta A)<delta<epsilon$.
          – Keen-ameteur
          Aug 11 at 8:11













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2875079%2ffind-a-finite-union-u-of-open-intervals%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

          Mutual Information Always Non-negative

          Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?