Evaluate $int_0^infty cos(bx)(x-ln(e^x-1))dx $
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
I have been given the integral
$$int_0^infty cos(bx)(x-ln(e^x-1))dx$$
from a friend. I found an answer in terms of the digamma function, but he told me that the answer is obtainable without imaginary numbers. I am completely dumbfounded on how he got the answer.
I have absolutely no idea where to start without using complex numbers. When $b=0$, it's pretty easy to show that it evaluates to $zeta(2)$ or $fracpi^26$. But I can't figure out a general form without using digamma.
integration
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
I have been given the integral
$$int_0^infty cos(bx)(x-ln(e^x-1))dx$$
from a friend. I found an answer in terms of the digamma function, but he told me that the answer is obtainable without imaginary numbers. I am completely dumbfounded on how he got the answer.
I have absolutely no idea where to start without using complex numbers. When $b=0$, it's pretty easy to show that it evaluates to $zeta(2)$ or $fracpi^26$. But I can't figure out a general form without using digamma.
integration
I am confused... you want to derive a representation without the Digamma function, or derive the Digamma representation without using complex methods?
â Frpzzd
Aug 7 at 18:50
@Frpzzd Sorry if it wasn't clear. He specifically said that "it can be evaluated without the Digamma function or complex numbers."
â Tom Himler
Aug 7 at 19:21
Very closely related.
â Simply Beautiful Art
Aug 7 at 19:22
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
I have been given the integral
$$int_0^infty cos(bx)(x-ln(e^x-1))dx$$
from a friend. I found an answer in terms of the digamma function, but he told me that the answer is obtainable without imaginary numbers. I am completely dumbfounded on how he got the answer.
I have absolutely no idea where to start without using complex numbers. When $b=0$, it's pretty easy to show that it evaluates to $zeta(2)$ or $fracpi^26$. But I can't figure out a general form without using digamma.
integration
I have been given the integral
$$int_0^infty cos(bx)(x-ln(e^x-1))dx$$
from a friend. I found an answer in terms of the digamma function, but he told me that the answer is obtainable without imaginary numbers. I am completely dumbfounded on how he got the answer.
I have absolutely no idea where to start without using complex numbers. When $b=0$, it's pretty easy to show that it evaluates to $zeta(2)$ or $fracpi^26$. But I can't figure out a general form without using digamma.
integration
edited Aug 7 at 18:42
Math Lover
12.5k21232
12.5k21232
asked Aug 7 at 18:34
Tom Himler
654213
654213
I am confused... you want to derive a representation without the Digamma function, or derive the Digamma representation without using complex methods?
â Frpzzd
Aug 7 at 18:50
@Frpzzd Sorry if it wasn't clear. He specifically said that "it can be evaluated without the Digamma function or complex numbers."
â Tom Himler
Aug 7 at 19:21
Very closely related.
â Simply Beautiful Art
Aug 7 at 19:22
add a comment |Â
I am confused... you want to derive a representation without the Digamma function, or derive the Digamma representation without using complex methods?
â Frpzzd
Aug 7 at 18:50
@Frpzzd Sorry if it wasn't clear. He specifically said that "it can be evaluated without the Digamma function or complex numbers."
â Tom Himler
Aug 7 at 19:21
Very closely related.
â Simply Beautiful Art
Aug 7 at 19:22
I am confused... you want to derive a representation without the Digamma function, or derive the Digamma representation without using complex methods?
â Frpzzd
Aug 7 at 18:50
I am confused... you want to derive a representation without the Digamma function, or derive the Digamma representation without using complex methods?
â Frpzzd
Aug 7 at 18:50
@Frpzzd Sorry if it wasn't clear. He specifically said that "it can be evaluated without the Digamma function or complex numbers."
â Tom Himler
Aug 7 at 19:21
@Frpzzd Sorry if it wasn't clear. He specifically said that "it can be evaluated without the Digamma function or complex numbers."
â Tom Himler
Aug 7 at 19:21
Very closely related.
â Simply Beautiful Art
Aug 7 at 19:22
Very closely related.
â Simply Beautiful Art
Aug 7 at 19:22
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
beginalign
int_0^infty cos bx(x-ln(e^x-1))dx
&= int_0^infty cos bxlndfrac11-e^-x dx\
&= int_0^infty cos bxsum_n=1^inftydfrace^-nxn dx\
&= sum_n=1^inftydfrac1nint_0^infty cos bx e^-nx dx\
&= sum_n=1^inftydfrac1ndfracnb^2+n^2\
&= sum_n=1^inftydfrac1b^2+n^2\
&= fracpicothpi b2b-dfrac12b^2
endalign
where $sum_n = 1^infty frac1n^2 + a^2 = fracpicoth(pi a)2a - frac12a^2$. Note that
$$int_0^infty cos bx e^-nx dx=cal L(cos bx)Big|_s=n=dfracnb^2+n^2$$
How might one prove the value of that series without using complex methods?
â Frpzzd
Aug 7 at 19:04
@Frpzzd Fourier series
â Cyclohexanol.
Aug 7 at 19:15
This is exactly how he did it, thanks!
â Tom Himler
Aug 7 at 19:22
You are welcome and good luck.
â Nosrati
Aug 7 at 19:23
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
beginalign
int_0^infty cos bx(x-ln(e^x-1))dx
&= int_0^infty cos bxlndfrac11-e^-x dx\
&= int_0^infty cos bxsum_n=1^inftydfrace^-nxn dx\
&= sum_n=1^inftydfrac1nint_0^infty cos bx e^-nx dx\
&= sum_n=1^inftydfrac1ndfracnb^2+n^2\
&= sum_n=1^inftydfrac1b^2+n^2\
&= fracpicothpi b2b-dfrac12b^2
endalign
where $sum_n = 1^infty frac1n^2 + a^2 = fracpicoth(pi a)2a - frac12a^2$. Note that
$$int_0^infty cos bx e^-nx dx=cal L(cos bx)Big|_s=n=dfracnb^2+n^2$$
How might one prove the value of that series without using complex methods?
â Frpzzd
Aug 7 at 19:04
@Frpzzd Fourier series
â Cyclohexanol.
Aug 7 at 19:15
This is exactly how he did it, thanks!
â Tom Himler
Aug 7 at 19:22
You are welcome and good luck.
â Nosrati
Aug 7 at 19:23
add a comment |Â
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
beginalign
int_0^infty cos bx(x-ln(e^x-1))dx
&= int_0^infty cos bxlndfrac11-e^-x dx\
&= int_0^infty cos bxsum_n=1^inftydfrace^-nxn dx\
&= sum_n=1^inftydfrac1nint_0^infty cos bx e^-nx dx\
&= sum_n=1^inftydfrac1ndfracnb^2+n^2\
&= sum_n=1^inftydfrac1b^2+n^2\
&= fracpicothpi b2b-dfrac12b^2
endalign
where $sum_n = 1^infty frac1n^2 + a^2 = fracpicoth(pi a)2a - frac12a^2$. Note that
$$int_0^infty cos bx e^-nx dx=cal L(cos bx)Big|_s=n=dfracnb^2+n^2$$
How might one prove the value of that series without using complex methods?
â Frpzzd
Aug 7 at 19:04
@Frpzzd Fourier series
â Cyclohexanol.
Aug 7 at 19:15
This is exactly how he did it, thanks!
â Tom Himler
Aug 7 at 19:22
You are welcome and good luck.
â Nosrati
Aug 7 at 19:23
add a comment |Â
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
beginalign
int_0^infty cos bx(x-ln(e^x-1))dx
&= int_0^infty cos bxlndfrac11-e^-x dx\
&= int_0^infty cos bxsum_n=1^inftydfrace^-nxn dx\
&= sum_n=1^inftydfrac1nint_0^infty cos bx e^-nx dx\
&= sum_n=1^inftydfrac1ndfracnb^2+n^2\
&= sum_n=1^inftydfrac1b^2+n^2\
&= fracpicothpi b2b-dfrac12b^2
endalign
where $sum_n = 1^infty frac1n^2 + a^2 = fracpicoth(pi a)2a - frac12a^2$. Note that
$$int_0^infty cos bx e^-nx dx=cal L(cos bx)Big|_s=n=dfracnb^2+n^2$$
beginalign
int_0^infty cos bx(x-ln(e^x-1))dx
&= int_0^infty cos bxlndfrac11-e^-x dx\
&= int_0^infty cos bxsum_n=1^inftydfrace^-nxn dx\
&= sum_n=1^inftydfrac1nint_0^infty cos bx e^-nx dx\
&= sum_n=1^inftydfrac1ndfracnb^2+n^2\
&= sum_n=1^inftydfrac1b^2+n^2\
&= fracpicothpi b2b-dfrac12b^2
endalign
where $sum_n = 1^infty frac1n^2 + a^2 = fracpicoth(pi a)2a - frac12a^2$. Note that
$$int_0^infty cos bx e^-nx dx=cal L(cos bx)Big|_s=n=dfracnb^2+n^2$$
answered Aug 7 at 18:56
Nosrati
20.2k41644
20.2k41644
How might one prove the value of that series without using complex methods?
â Frpzzd
Aug 7 at 19:04
@Frpzzd Fourier series
â Cyclohexanol.
Aug 7 at 19:15
This is exactly how he did it, thanks!
â Tom Himler
Aug 7 at 19:22
You are welcome and good luck.
â Nosrati
Aug 7 at 19:23
add a comment |Â
How might one prove the value of that series without using complex methods?
â Frpzzd
Aug 7 at 19:04
@Frpzzd Fourier series
â Cyclohexanol.
Aug 7 at 19:15
This is exactly how he did it, thanks!
â Tom Himler
Aug 7 at 19:22
You are welcome and good luck.
â Nosrati
Aug 7 at 19:23
How might one prove the value of that series without using complex methods?
â Frpzzd
Aug 7 at 19:04
How might one prove the value of that series without using complex methods?
â Frpzzd
Aug 7 at 19:04
@Frpzzd Fourier series
â Cyclohexanol.
Aug 7 at 19:15
@Frpzzd Fourier series
â Cyclohexanol.
Aug 7 at 19:15
This is exactly how he did it, thanks!
â Tom Himler
Aug 7 at 19:22
This is exactly how he did it, thanks!
â Tom Himler
Aug 7 at 19:22
You are welcome and good luck.
â Nosrati
Aug 7 at 19:23
You are welcome and good luck.
â Nosrati
Aug 7 at 19:23
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2875250%2fevaluate-int-0-infty-cosbxx-lnex-1dx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
I am confused... you want to derive a representation without the Digamma function, or derive the Digamma representation without using complex methods?
â Frpzzd
Aug 7 at 18:50
@Frpzzd Sorry if it wasn't clear. He specifically said that "it can be evaluated without the Digamma function or complex numbers."
â Tom Himler
Aug 7 at 19:21
Very closely related.
â Simply Beautiful Art
Aug 7 at 19:22