On reflexivity properties of the Schwartz space
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Consider $mathscrS$ the Schwartz space of rapidly decreasing complex smooth functions over $mathbbR^d$, equipped with its usual metric topology, and $mathscrS'$ its topological dual (the space of tempered distributions). I have a few questions concerning the reflexivity of the space $mathscrS$ when $mathscrS'$ is equipped with the weak-$*$ topology.
The first question: Does it hold that $(mathscrS')' = mathscrS$ in an algebraic sense?. To be precise, if $L : mathscrS' to mathbbC$ is a linear functional, continuous with the weak-$*$ topology on $mathscrS'$, is there a unique function $varphi in mathscrS$ such that $$L(T) = langle T , varphi rangle, quad forall T in mathscrS'. $$
According to classical litterature in Theory of Distributions (for example, Shcwartz's book Théorie des Distributions), this is true when $mathscrS'$ is equipped with the strong topology, although I have trouble understanding the notion of this topology (for instance, what does it means for a subset of $mathscrS$ to be bounded? Is it just the classical definition on metric spaces?). I would like to know if it also holds for the weak-$*$ topology.
The second question is if the weak topology on $mathscrS$ is equivalent to the metric one. To be precise, if $(varphi_n)_n in mathbbN$ is a sequence of functions in $mathscrS$ such that $ langle T , varphi_n rangle to 0 $ for all $T in mathscrS'$, does it hold that $varphi_n to 0 $ in the sense of the metric of the Schwartz space?
Thank you very much for your help.
schwartz-space reflexive-space
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Consider $mathscrS$ the Schwartz space of rapidly decreasing complex smooth functions over $mathbbR^d$, equipped with its usual metric topology, and $mathscrS'$ its topological dual (the space of tempered distributions). I have a few questions concerning the reflexivity of the space $mathscrS$ when $mathscrS'$ is equipped with the weak-$*$ topology.
The first question: Does it hold that $(mathscrS')' = mathscrS$ in an algebraic sense?. To be precise, if $L : mathscrS' to mathbbC$ is a linear functional, continuous with the weak-$*$ topology on $mathscrS'$, is there a unique function $varphi in mathscrS$ such that $$L(T) = langle T , varphi rangle, quad forall T in mathscrS'. $$
According to classical litterature in Theory of Distributions (for example, Shcwartz's book Théorie des Distributions), this is true when $mathscrS'$ is equipped with the strong topology, although I have trouble understanding the notion of this topology (for instance, what does it means for a subset of $mathscrS$ to be bounded? Is it just the classical definition on metric spaces?). I would like to know if it also holds for the weak-$*$ topology.
The second question is if the weak topology on $mathscrS$ is equivalent to the metric one. To be precise, if $(varphi_n)_n in mathbbN$ is a sequence of functions in $mathscrS$ such that $ langle T , varphi_n rangle to 0 $ for all $T in mathscrS'$, does it hold that $varphi_n to 0 $ in the sense of the metric of the Schwartz space?
Thank you very much for your help.
schwartz-space reflexive-space
For the first question the answer is yes because if the map $L$ is continuous for the weak-$ast$ topology on the domain, it will be continuous for the strong topology. The second question is interesting. I don't know the answer right off the bat. The best way to approach it, I think, is to use the isomorphism of Schwartz space with the space of sequences with fast decay, see e.g. aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/1.1665472
â Abdelmalek Abdesselam
Aug 9 at 15:27
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Consider $mathscrS$ the Schwartz space of rapidly decreasing complex smooth functions over $mathbbR^d$, equipped with its usual metric topology, and $mathscrS'$ its topological dual (the space of tempered distributions). I have a few questions concerning the reflexivity of the space $mathscrS$ when $mathscrS'$ is equipped with the weak-$*$ topology.
The first question: Does it hold that $(mathscrS')' = mathscrS$ in an algebraic sense?. To be precise, if $L : mathscrS' to mathbbC$ is a linear functional, continuous with the weak-$*$ topology on $mathscrS'$, is there a unique function $varphi in mathscrS$ such that $$L(T) = langle T , varphi rangle, quad forall T in mathscrS'. $$
According to classical litterature in Theory of Distributions (for example, Shcwartz's book Théorie des Distributions), this is true when $mathscrS'$ is equipped with the strong topology, although I have trouble understanding the notion of this topology (for instance, what does it means for a subset of $mathscrS$ to be bounded? Is it just the classical definition on metric spaces?). I would like to know if it also holds for the weak-$*$ topology.
The second question is if the weak topology on $mathscrS$ is equivalent to the metric one. To be precise, if $(varphi_n)_n in mathbbN$ is a sequence of functions in $mathscrS$ such that $ langle T , varphi_n rangle to 0 $ for all $T in mathscrS'$, does it hold that $varphi_n to 0 $ in the sense of the metric of the Schwartz space?
Thank you very much for your help.
schwartz-space reflexive-space
Consider $mathscrS$ the Schwartz space of rapidly decreasing complex smooth functions over $mathbbR^d$, equipped with its usual metric topology, and $mathscrS'$ its topological dual (the space of tempered distributions). I have a few questions concerning the reflexivity of the space $mathscrS$ when $mathscrS'$ is equipped with the weak-$*$ topology.
The first question: Does it hold that $(mathscrS')' = mathscrS$ in an algebraic sense?. To be precise, if $L : mathscrS' to mathbbC$ is a linear functional, continuous with the weak-$*$ topology on $mathscrS'$, is there a unique function $varphi in mathscrS$ such that $$L(T) = langle T , varphi rangle, quad forall T in mathscrS'. $$
According to classical litterature in Theory of Distributions (for example, Shcwartz's book Théorie des Distributions), this is true when $mathscrS'$ is equipped with the strong topology, although I have trouble understanding the notion of this topology (for instance, what does it means for a subset of $mathscrS$ to be bounded? Is it just the classical definition on metric spaces?). I would like to know if it also holds for the weak-$*$ topology.
The second question is if the weak topology on $mathscrS$ is equivalent to the metric one. To be precise, if $(varphi_n)_n in mathbbN$ is a sequence of functions in $mathscrS$ such that $ langle T , varphi_n rangle to 0 $ for all $T in mathscrS'$, does it hold that $varphi_n to 0 $ in the sense of the metric of the Schwartz space?
Thank you very much for your help.
schwartz-space reflexive-space
asked Aug 7 at 19:42
CarrizoV
312
312
For the first question the answer is yes because if the map $L$ is continuous for the weak-$ast$ topology on the domain, it will be continuous for the strong topology. The second question is interesting. I don't know the answer right off the bat. The best way to approach it, I think, is to use the isomorphism of Schwartz space with the space of sequences with fast decay, see e.g. aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/1.1665472
â Abdelmalek Abdesselam
Aug 9 at 15:27
add a comment |Â
For the first question the answer is yes because if the map $L$ is continuous for the weak-$ast$ topology on the domain, it will be continuous for the strong topology. The second question is interesting. I don't know the answer right off the bat. The best way to approach it, I think, is to use the isomorphism of Schwartz space with the space of sequences with fast decay, see e.g. aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/1.1665472
â Abdelmalek Abdesselam
Aug 9 at 15:27
For the first question the answer is yes because if the map $L$ is continuous for the weak-$ast$ topology on the domain, it will be continuous for the strong topology. The second question is interesting. I don't know the answer right off the bat. The best way to approach it, I think, is to use the isomorphism of Schwartz space with the space of sequences with fast decay, see e.g. aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/1.1665472
â Abdelmalek Abdesselam
Aug 9 at 15:27
For the first question the answer is yes because if the map $L$ is continuous for the weak-$ast$ topology on the domain, it will be continuous for the strong topology. The second question is interesting. I don't know the answer right off the bat. The best way to approach it, I think, is to use the isomorphism of Schwartz space with the space of sequences with fast decay, see e.g. aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/1.1665472
â Abdelmalek Abdesselam
Aug 9 at 15:27
add a comment |Â
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2875322%2fon-reflexivity-properties-of-the-schwartz-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
For the first question the answer is yes because if the map $L$ is continuous for the weak-$ast$ topology on the domain, it will be continuous for the strong topology. The second question is interesting. I don't know the answer right off the bat. The best way to approach it, I think, is to use the isomorphism of Schwartz space with the space of sequences with fast decay, see e.g. aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/1.1665472
â Abdelmalek Abdesselam
Aug 9 at 15:27