$V=U_1oplus …oplus U_n iff dim(V)=dim(U_1)+…+dim(U_n)$ and $V=U_1+…+U_n$.

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I want to prove that $$textif dim(V)=dim(U_1)+dots+dim(U_n)text and V=U_1+dots+U_ntext, then V=U_1oplusdotsoplus U_n $$



If $n=1$, it's obvious. Set $W=U_1+dots+U_n-1$ and suppose $dim(W)=dim(U_1)+dots+dim(U_n-1)$. By the induction hypothesis, we have that $W=U_1oplusdotsoplus U_n-1$. Let's prove that $V=Woplus U_n$, given that we have that $V=W+U_n$ and $dim(V)=dim(W)+dim(U_n)$. Therefore $$dim(Wcap U_n)=dim(W)+dim(U_n)-dim(W+U_n)=dim(V)-dim(V)=0.$$
Therefore, $$V=Woplus U_n=U_1oplusdotsoplus U_n.$$



Does it work ? My big doubt is about the fact that I implicitly used $$(Aoplus B)oplus C=Aoplus Boplus C,$$
and I'm not really sure if it really holds.







share|cite|improve this question





















  • Of course it works. The best way to be sure is to prove $(Aoplus B)oplus C=Aoplus Boplus C$ (and it's really not complicated).
    – Surb
    Aug 7 at 17:31











  • In order to proceed by induction you need to be able to prove that $$[dim(V)=dim(U_1)+...+dim(U_n)quad textandquad V=U_1+...+U_n]implies [dim(U_1+...+U_n-1)=dim(U_1)+...+dim(U_n-1)]$$
    – Arnaud Mortier
    Aug 7 at 17:37














up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I want to prove that $$textif dim(V)=dim(U_1)+dots+dim(U_n)text and V=U_1+dots+U_ntext, then V=U_1oplusdotsoplus U_n $$



If $n=1$, it's obvious. Set $W=U_1+dots+U_n-1$ and suppose $dim(W)=dim(U_1)+dots+dim(U_n-1)$. By the induction hypothesis, we have that $W=U_1oplusdotsoplus U_n-1$. Let's prove that $V=Woplus U_n$, given that we have that $V=W+U_n$ and $dim(V)=dim(W)+dim(U_n)$. Therefore $$dim(Wcap U_n)=dim(W)+dim(U_n)-dim(W+U_n)=dim(V)-dim(V)=0.$$
Therefore, $$V=Woplus U_n=U_1oplusdotsoplus U_n.$$



Does it work ? My big doubt is about the fact that I implicitly used $$(Aoplus B)oplus C=Aoplus Boplus C,$$
and I'm not really sure if it really holds.







share|cite|improve this question





















  • Of course it works. The best way to be sure is to prove $(Aoplus B)oplus C=Aoplus Boplus C$ (and it's really not complicated).
    – Surb
    Aug 7 at 17:31











  • In order to proceed by induction you need to be able to prove that $$[dim(V)=dim(U_1)+...+dim(U_n)quad textandquad V=U_1+...+U_n]implies [dim(U_1+...+U_n-1)=dim(U_1)+...+dim(U_n-1)]$$
    – Arnaud Mortier
    Aug 7 at 17:37












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











I want to prove that $$textif dim(V)=dim(U_1)+dots+dim(U_n)text and V=U_1+dots+U_ntext, then V=U_1oplusdotsoplus U_n $$



If $n=1$, it's obvious. Set $W=U_1+dots+U_n-1$ and suppose $dim(W)=dim(U_1)+dots+dim(U_n-1)$. By the induction hypothesis, we have that $W=U_1oplusdotsoplus U_n-1$. Let's prove that $V=Woplus U_n$, given that we have that $V=W+U_n$ and $dim(V)=dim(W)+dim(U_n)$. Therefore $$dim(Wcap U_n)=dim(W)+dim(U_n)-dim(W+U_n)=dim(V)-dim(V)=0.$$
Therefore, $$V=Woplus U_n=U_1oplusdotsoplus U_n.$$



Does it work ? My big doubt is about the fact that I implicitly used $$(Aoplus B)oplus C=Aoplus Boplus C,$$
and I'm not really sure if it really holds.







share|cite|improve this question













I want to prove that $$textif dim(V)=dim(U_1)+dots+dim(U_n)text and V=U_1+dots+U_ntext, then V=U_1oplusdotsoplus U_n $$



If $n=1$, it's obvious. Set $W=U_1+dots+U_n-1$ and suppose $dim(W)=dim(U_1)+dots+dim(U_n-1)$. By the induction hypothesis, we have that $W=U_1oplusdotsoplus U_n-1$. Let's prove that $V=Woplus U_n$, given that we have that $V=W+U_n$ and $dim(V)=dim(W)+dim(U_n)$. Therefore $$dim(Wcap U_n)=dim(W)+dim(U_n)-dim(W+U_n)=dim(V)-dim(V)=0.$$
Therefore, $$V=Woplus U_n=U_1oplusdotsoplus U_n.$$



Does it work ? My big doubt is about the fact that I implicitly used $$(Aoplus B)oplus C=Aoplus Boplus C,$$
and I'm not really sure if it really holds.









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 7 at 17:46









zzuussee

1,639420




1,639420









asked Aug 7 at 17:29









Henri

404




404











  • Of course it works. The best way to be sure is to prove $(Aoplus B)oplus C=Aoplus Boplus C$ (and it's really not complicated).
    – Surb
    Aug 7 at 17:31











  • In order to proceed by induction you need to be able to prove that $$[dim(V)=dim(U_1)+...+dim(U_n)quad textandquad V=U_1+...+U_n]implies [dim(U_1+...+U_n-1)=dim(U_1)+...+dim(U_n-1)]$$
    – Arnaud Mortier
    Aug 7 at 17:37
















  • Of course it works. The best way to be sure is to prove $(Aoplus B)oplus C=Aoplus Boplus C$ (and it's really not complicated).
    – Surb
    Aug 7 at 17:31











  • In order to proceed by induction you need to be able to prove that $$[dim(V)=dim(U_1)+...+dim(U_n)quad textandquad V=U_1+...+U_n]implies [dim(U_1+...+U_n-1)=dim(U_1)+...+dim(U_n-1)]$$
    – Arnaud Mortier
    Aug 7 at 17:37















Of course it works. The best way to be sure is to prove $(Aoplus B)oplus C=Aoplus Boplus C$ (and it's really not complicated).
– Surb
Aug 7 at 17:31





Of course it works. The best way to be sure is to prove $(Aoplus B)oplus C=Aoplus Boplus C$ (and it's really not complicated).
– Surb
Aug 7 at 17:31













In order to proceed by induction you need to be able to prove that $$[dim(V)=dim(U_1)+...+dim(U_n)quad textandquad V=U_1+...+U_n]implies [dim(U_1+...+U_n-1)=dim(U_1)+...+dim(U_n-1)]$$
– Arnaud Mortier
Aug 7 at 17:37




In order to proceed by induction you need to be able to prove that $$[dim(V)=dim(U_1)+...+dim(U_n)quad textandquad V=U_1+...+U_n]implies [dim(U_1+...+U_n-1)=dim(U_1)+...+dim(U_n-1)]$$
– Arnaud Mortier
Aug 7 at 17:37















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2875184%2fv-u-1-oplus-oplus-u-n-iff-dimv-dimu-1-dimu-n-and-v-u-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes










 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2875184%2fv-u-1-oplus-oplus-u-n-iff-dimv-dimu-1-dimu-n-and-v-u-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

Mutual Information Always Non-negative

Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?