Computing volume for a scutoid

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I was challenged by someone to compute the volume for a scutoid. At first I wanted to know how this shape is described mathematically, but did not find much on that so I started with what I already know:



  • bottom is hexagonal

  • top is pentagonal

  • there is a triangle between 2 "faces"

  • the 2 "faces" where the triangle cannot be in one plane

Starting from these, the first thing that I needed to do, independent of the method of computation, was to get some formula for the non-plane faces. My attempt to solve this relied on assuming that the surface satisfies Laplace equation (I thought of it as an elastic membrane that is stretched so that it touches the edges of the face I'm interested in).



Having those 2 computed, I guess one can try to integrate but I'm still traumatized by this approach, so I would make use of the method of inserting this shape into a cube like volume, generate random points and them count the ones that fall inside the shape.



Any other ideas that are not based on using a PC (solving the Laplace equations and the volume computation part)?







share|cite|improve this question





















  • There are practical ways, i.e. building one and then sinking it and measuring the volume of water displaced. Can't help beyond that.
    – stuart stevenson
    Aug 7 at 15:43










  • The Wikipedia article says the name comes from scutum so I guess it's pronounced "skew-toid" not "scut-oid."
    – saulspatz
    Aug 7 at 15:56










  • You need more constraints, there are many types of scutoids, so that information alone won't help you find the volume.
    – Rushabh Mehta
    Aug 7 at 15:59










  • Ignore curved faces. Add a tetrahedron to get a hexagonal prism.
    – Ed Pegg
    Aug 7 at 16:00






  • 1




    @EdPegg He could use the lattice points you used in your other question, but that won't have the packing property that the scutoid has because of flat faces.
    – Rushabh Mehta
    Aug 7 at 16:02














up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I was challenged by someone to compute the volume for a scutoid. At first I wanted to know how this shape is described mathematically, but did not find much on that so I started with what I already know:



  • bottom is hexagonal

  • top is pentagonal

  • there is a triangle between 2 "faces"

  • the 2 "faces" where the triangle cannot be in one plane

Starting from these, the first thing that I needed to do, independent of the method of computation, was to get some formula for the non-plane faces. My attempt to solve this relied on assuming that the surface satisfies Laplace equation (I thought of it as an elastic membrane that is stretched so that it touches the edges of the face I'm interested in).



Having those 2 computed, I guess one can try to integrate but I'm still traumatized by this approach, so I would make use of the method of inserting this shape into a cube like volume, generate random points and them count the ones that fall inside the shape.



Any other ideas that are not based on using a PC (solving the Laplace equations and the volume computation part)?







share|cite|improve this question





















  • There are practical ways, i.e. building one and then sinking it and measuring the volume of water displaced. Can't help beyond that.
    – stuart stevenson
    Aug 7 at 15:43










  • The Wikipedia article says the name comes from scutum so I guess it's pronounced "skew-toid" not "scut-oid."
    – saulspatz
    Aug 7 at 15:56










  • You need more constraints, there are many types of scutoids, so that information alone won't help you find the volume.
    – Rushabh Mehta
    Aug 7 at 15:59










  • Ignore curved faces. Add a tetrahedron to get a hexagonal prism.
    – Ed Pegg
    Aug 7 at 16:00






  • 1




    @EdPegg He could use the lattice points you used in your other question, but that won't have the packing property that the scutoid has because of flat faces.
    – Rushabh Mehta
    Aug 7 at 16:02












up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











I was challenged by someone to compute the volume for a scutoid. At first I wanted to know how this shape is described mathematically, but did not find much on that so I started with what I already know:



  • bottom is hexagonal

  • top is pentagonal

  • there is a triangle between 2 "faces"

  • the 2 "faces" where the triangle cannot be in one plane

Starting from these, the first thing that I needed to do, independent of the method of computation, was to get some formula for the non-plane faces. My attempt to solve this relied on assuming that the surface satisfies Laplace equation (I thought of it as an elastic membrane that is stretched so that it touches the edges of the face I'm interested in).



Having those 2 computed, I guess one can try to integrate but I'm still traumatized by this approach, so I would make use of the method of inserting this shape into a cube like volume, generate random points and them count the ones that fall inside the shape.



Any other ideas that are not based on using a PC (solving the Laplace equations and the volume computation part)?







share|cite|improve this question













I was challenged by someone to compute the volume for a scutoid. At first I wanted to know how this shape is described mathematically, but did not find much on that so I started with what I already know:



  • bottom is hexagonal

  • top is pentagonal

  • there is a triangle between 2 "faces"

  • the 2 "faces" where the triangle cannot be in one plane

Starting from these, the first thing that I needed to do, independent of the method of computation, was to get some formula for the non-plane faces. My attempt to solve this relied on assuming that the surface satisfies Laplace equation (I thought of it as an elastic membrane that is stretched so that it touches the edges of the face I'm interested in).



Having those 2 computed, I guess one can try to integrate but I'm still traumatized by this approach, so I would make use of the method of inserting this shape into a cube like volume, generate random points and them count the ones that fall inside the shape.



Any other ideas that are not based on using a PC (solving the Laplace equations and the volume computation part)?









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 7 at 15:58









Ed Pegg

9,24732486




9,24732486









asked Aug 7 at 15:37









Victor Palea

246311




246311











  • There are practical ways, i.e. building one and then sinking it and measuring the volume of water displaced. Can't help beyond that.
    – stuart stevenson
    Aug 7 at 15:43










  • The Wikipedia article says the name comes from scutum so I guess it's pronounced "skew-toid" not "scut-oid."
    – saulspatz
    Aug 7 at 15:56










  • You need more constraints, there are many types of scutoids, so that information alone won't help you find the volume.
    – Rushabh Mehta
    Aug 7 at 15:59










  • Ignore curved faces. Add a tetrahedron to get a hexagonal prism.
    – Ed Pegg
    Aug 7 at 16:00






  • 1




    @EdPegg He could use the lattice points you used in your other question, but that won't have the packing property that the scutoid has because of flat faces.
    – Rushabh Mehta
    Aug 7 at 16:02
















  • There are practical ways, i.e. building one and then sinking it and measuring the volume of water displaced. Can't help beyond that.
    – stuart stevenson
    Aug 7 at 15:43










  • The Wikipedia article says the name comes from scutum so I guess it's pronounced "skew-toid" not "scut-oid."
    – saulspatz
    Aug 7 at 15:56










  • You need more constraints, there are many types of scutoids, so that information alone won't help you find the volume.
    – Rushabh Mehta
    Aug 7 at 15:59










  • Ignore curved faces. Add a tetrahedron to get a hexagonal prism.
    – Ed Pegg
    Aug 7 at 16:00






  • 1




    @EdPegg He could use the lattice points you used in your other question, but that won't have the packing property that the scutoid has because of flat faces.
    – Rushabh Mehta
    Aug 7 at 16:02















There are practical ways, i.e. building one and then sinking it and measuring the volume of water displaced. Can't help beyond that.
– stuart stevenson
Aug 7 at 15:43




There are practical ways, i.e. building one and then sinking it and measuring the volume of water displaced. Can't help beyond that.
– stuart stevenson
Aug 7 at 15:43












The Wikipedia article says the name comes from scutum so I guess it's pronounced "skew-toid" not "scut-oid."
– saulspatz
Aug 7 at 15:56




The Wikipedia article says the name comes from scutum so I guess it's pronounced "skew-toid" not "scut-oid."
– saulspatz
Aug 7 at 15:56












You need more constraints, there are many types of scutoids, so that information alone won't help you find the volume.
– Rushabh Mehta
Aug 7 at 15:59




You need more constraints, there are many types of scutoids, so that information alone won't help you find the volume.
– Rushabh Mehta
Aug 7 at 15:59












Ignore curved faces. Add a tetrahedron to get a hexagonal prism.
– Ed Pegg
Aug 7 at 16:00




Ignore curved faces. Add a tetrahedron to get a hexagonal prism.
– Ed Pegg
Aug 7 at 16:00




1




1




@EdPegg He could use the lattice points you used in your other question, but that won't have the packing property that the scutoid has because of flat faces.
– Rushabh Mehta
Aug 7 at 16:02




@EdPegg He could use the lattice points you used in your other question, but that won't have the packing property that the scutoid has because of flat faces.
– Rushabh Mehta
Aug 7 at 16:02















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2875099%2fcomputing-volume-for-a-scutoid%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes










 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2875099%2fcomputing-volume-for-a-scutoid%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

Mutual Information Always Non-negative

Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?