Question regarding complex differentiability and vector differentiability from $R rightarrow R^2$

Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Suppose I have a function defined from R to C: $f(t)=R(t)+iI(t)$
When someone wants to show that the above function is differentiable are they talking about complex differentiability or vector differentiation?
If this function is complex differentiable i.e $lim_zto z_0fracf(z)-f(z_0)z-z_0 $ is it also vector differentiable i.e $f'(t)=R'(t)+iI'(t)$.
I think I could be confused with the definition of complex differentiability. Is it only for functions defined on an open connected subset of C? Thus the function above cannot be complex differentiable since its only defined on R which is not open?
complex-analysis multivariable-calculus derivatives
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Suppose I have a function defined from R to C: $f(t)=R(t)+iI(t)$
When someone wants to show that the above function is differentiable are they talking about complex differentiability or vector differentiation?
If this function is complex differentiable i.e $lim_zto z_0fracf(z)-f(z_0)z-z_0 $ is it also vector differentiable i.e $f'(t)=R'(t)+iI'(t)$.
I think I could be confused with the definition of complex differentiability. Is it only for functions defined on an open connected subset of C? Thus the function above cannot be complex differentiable since its only defined on R which is not open?
complex-analysis multivariable-calculus derivatives
It is 'normal' differentiation since the domain is real. It is equivalent to $R,I$ being separately differentiable.
â copper.hat
Aug 14 at 4:24
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Suppose I have a function defined from R to C: $f(t)=R(t)+iI(t)$
When someone wants to show that the above function is differentiable are they talking about complex differentiability or vector differentiation?
If this function is complex differentiable i.e $lim_zto z_0fracf(z)-f(z_0)z-z_0 $ is it also vector differentiable i.e $f'(t)=R'(t)+iI'(t)$.
I think I could be confused with the definition of complex differentiability. Is it only for functions defined on an open connected subset of C? Thus the function above cannot be complex differentiable since its only defined on R which is not open?
complex-analysis multivariable-calculus derivatives
Suppose I have a function defined from R to C: $f(t)=R(t)+iI(t)$
When someone wants to show that the above function is differentiable are they talking about complex differentiability or vector differentiation?
If this function is complex differentiable i.e $lim_zto z_0fracf(z)-f(z_0)z-z_0 $ is it also vector differentiable i.e $f'(t)=R'(t)+iI'(t)$.
I think I could be confused with the definition of complex differentiability. Is it only for functions defined on an open connected subset of C? Thus the function above cannot be complex differentiable since its only defined on R which is not open?
complex-analysis multivariable-calculus derivatives
asked Aug 14 at 3:48
Jhon Doe
397211
397211
It is 'normal' differentiation since the domain is real. It is equivalent to $R,I$ being separately differentiable.
â copper.hat
Aug 14 at 4:24
add a comment |Â
It is 'normal' differentiation since the domain is real. It is equivalent to $R,I$ being separately differentiable.
â copper.hat
Aug 14 at 4:24
It is 'normal' differentiation since the domain is real. It is equivalent to $R,I$ being separately differentiable.
â copper.hat
Aug 14 at 4:24
It is 'normal' differentiation since the domain is real. It is equivalent to $R,I$ being separately differentiable.
â copper.hat
Aug 14 at 4:24
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Functions $f=u+iv$ of type $mathbb Rtomathbb C$ can have a derivative
$$f'(t)=lim_hto0f(t+h)-f(t)over h .tag1$$
Here the limit is a limit in $mathbb C$, but the dummy variable $h$ is real only. According to the rules about limits in $mathbb C$ or $mathbb R^n$ this limit can be taken "coordinatewise". Since the $h$ in the denominator is real, the real and imaginary parts of $f$ don't get intermingled during the process. Therefore we have $$f'(t)=u'(t)+iv'(t) .$$
Sometimes (e.g., if $f=exp$, or if $f$ is a polynomial) such a function $f$ can be extended to the complex domain $mathbb Csupsetmathbb R$ whereby it becomes an analytic function of the complex variable $z=t+i tau$. Only then it makes sense to consider the complex derivative
$$f'(z):=lim_Delta zto0f(z+Delta z)-f(z)overDelta z .$$
Here $Delta z$ goes to $0$ "from all directions". If $z=tinmathbb R$ happens to be a real point then the complex derivative $f'(z)$ coincides of course with the $f'(t)$ defined in $(1)$.
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Functions $f=u+iv$ of type $mathbb Rtomathbb C$ can have a derivative
$$f'(t)=lim_hto0f(t+h)-f(t)over h .tag1$$
Here the limit is a limit in $mathbb C$, but the dummy variable $h$ is real only. According to the rules about limits in $mathbb C$ or $mathbb R^n$ this limit can be taken "coordinatewise". Since the $h$ in the denominator is real, the real and imaginary parts of $f$ don't get intermingled during the process. Therefore we have $$f'(t)=u'(t)+iv'(t) .$$
Sometimes (e.g., if $f=exp$, or if $f$ is a polynomial) such a function $f$ can be extended to the complex domain $mathbb Csupsetmathbb R$ whereby it becomes an analytic function of the complex variable $z=t+i tau$. Only then it makes sense to consider the complex derivative
$$f'(z):=lim_Delta zto0f(z+Delta z)-f(z)overDelta z .$$
Here $Delta z$ goes to $0$ "from all directions". If $z=tinmathbb R$ happens to be a real point then the complex derivative $f'(z)$ coincides of course with the $f'(t)$ defined in $(1)$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Functions $f=u+iv$ of type $mathbb Rtomathbb C$ can have a derivative
$$f'(t)=lim_hto0f(t+h)-f(t)over h .tag1$$
Here the limit is a limit in $mathbb C$, but the dummy variable $h$ is real only. According to the rules about limits in $mathbb C$ or $mathbb R^n$ this limit can be taken "coordinatewise". Since the $h$ in the denominator is real, the real and imaginary parts of $f$ don't get intermingled during the process. Therefore we have $$f'(t)=u'(t)+iv'(t) .$$
Sometimes (e.g., if $f=exp$, or if $f$ is a polynomial) such a function $f$ can be extended to the complex domain $mathbb Csupsetmathbb R$ whereby it becomes an analytic function of the complex variable $z=t+i tau$. Only then it makes sense to consider the complex derivative
$$f'(z):=lim_Delta zto0f(z+Delta z)-f(z)overDelta z .$$
Here $Delta z$ goes to $0$ "from all directions". If $z=tinmathbb R$ happens to be a real point then the complex derivative $f'(z)$ coincides of course with the $f'(t)$ defined in $(1)$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Functions $f=u+iv$ of type $mathbb Rtomathbb C$ can have a derivative
$$f'(t)=lim_hto0f(t+h)-f(t)over h .tag1$$
Here the limit is a limit in $mathbb C$, but the dummy variable $h$ is real only. According to the rules about limits in $mathbb C$ or $mathbb R^n$ this limit can be taken "coordinatewise". Since the $h$ in the denominator is real, the real and imaginary parts of $f$ don't get intermingled during the process. Therefore we have $$f'(t)=u'(t)+iv'(t) .$$
Sometimes (e.g., if $f=exp$, or if $f$ is a polynomial) such a function $f$ can be extended to the complex domain $mathbb Csupsetmathbb R$ whereby it becomes an analytic function of the complex variable $z=t+i tau$. Only then it makes sense to consider the complex derivative
$$f'(z):=lim_Delta zto0f(z+Delta z)-f(z)overDelta z .$$
Here $Delta z$ goes to $0$ "from all directions". If $z=tinmathbb R$ happens to be a real point then the complex derivative $f'(z)$ coincides of course with the $f'(t)$ defined in $(1)$.
Functions $f=u+iv$ of type $mathbb Rtomathbb C$ can have a derivative
$$f'(t)=lim_hto0f(t+h)-f(t)over h .tag1$$
Here the limit is a limit in $mathbb C$, but the dummy variable $h$ is real only. According to the rules about limits in $mathbb C$ or $mathbb R^n$ this limit can be taken "coordinatewise". Since the $h$ in the denominator is real, the real and imaginary parts of $f$ don't get intermingled during the process. Therefore we have $$f'(t)=u'(t)+iv'(t) .$$
Sometimes (e.g., if $f=exp$, or if $f$ is a polynomial) such a function $f$ can be extended to the complex domain $mathbb Csupsetmathbb R$ whereby it becomes an analytic function of the complex variable $z=t+i tau$. Only then it makes sense to consider the complex derivative
$$f'(z):=lim_Delta zto0f(z+Delta z)-f(z)overDelta z .$$
Here $Delta z$ goes to $0$ "from all directions". If $z=tinmathbb R$ happens to be a real point then the complex derivative $f'(z)$ coincides of course with the $f'(t)$ defined in $(1)$.
answered Aug 14 at 9:19
Christian Blatter
165k7109309
165k7109309
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2882041%2fquestion-regarding-complex-differentiability-and-vector-differentiability-from%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
It is 'normal' differentiation since the domain is real. It is equivalent to $R,I$ being separately differentiable.
â copper.hat
Aug 14 at 4:24