What is the correct phraseology for "runway 03 R”?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
15
down vote

favorite
1












What phraseology is normally used for "runway 03 R" by air-traffic control and pilots?



A couple of possible options I came up with:



  • runway zero three R

  • runway three R

  • runway zero three right

  • runway three right

Is there any standard or preference of one form or the other to reduce confusion during communication?




radio-communications runways phraseology




share|improve this question


















  • 1




    Are you asking about a specific country? The US has a different practice here from the rest (?) of the world.
    – Pondlife
    Aug 14 at 13:52














up vote
15
down vote

favorite
1












What phraseology is normally used for "runway 03 R" by air-traffic control and pilots?



A couple of possible options I came up with:



  • runway zero three R

  • runway three R

  • runway zero three right

  • runway three right

Is there any standard or preference of one form or the other to reduce confusion during communication?




radio-communications runways phraseology




share|improve this question


















  • 1




    Are you asking about a specific country? The US has a different practice here from the rest (?) of the world.
    – Pondlife
    Aug 14 at 13:52












up vote
15
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
15
down vote

favorite
1






1





What phraseology is normally used for "runway 03 R" by air-traffic control and pilots?



A couple of possible options I came up with:



  • runway zero three R

  • runway three R

  • runway zero three right

  • runway three right

Is there any standard or preference of one form or the other to reduce confusion during communication?




radio-communications runways phraseology




share|improve this question














What phraseology is normally used for "runway 03 R" by air-traffic control and pilots?



A couple of possible options I came up with:



  • runway zero three R

  • runway three R

  • runway zero three right

  • runway three right

Is there any standard or preference of one form or the other to reduce confusion during communication?





radio-communications runways phraseology





share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Aug 14 at 14:00









Pondlife

47.7k7123261




47.7k7123261










asked Aug 14 at 8:19









Lone Learner

1763




1763







  • 1




    Are you asking about a specific country? The US has a different practice here from the rest (?) of the world.
    – Pondlife
    Aug 14 at 13:52












  • 1




    Are you asking about a specific country? The US has a different practice here from the rest (?) of the world.
    – Pondlife
    Aug 14 at 13:52







1




1




Are you asking about a specific country? The US has a different practice here from the rest (?) of the world.
– Pondlife
Aug 14 at 13:52




Are you asking about a specific country? The US has a different practice here from the rest (?) of the world.
– Pondlife
Aug 14 at 13:52










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
22
down vote













Runway 03 R would be pronounced as




Runway Zero Three Right




As ever, although British, I thoroughly recommend CAP 413 the UK's Radio Telephony manual:



https://publicapps.caa.co.uk/modalapplication.aspx?catid=1&pagetype=65&appid=11&mode=detail&id=6973



It's mostly ICAO compliant and barring small differences, should contain plenty of information for most operations. You'll see all runways are stated using two digits. Unfortunately I can't find an example of parallel runways in there.



One important note




Runway Zero Three Right




Designates runway 03R, as opposed to runway 03L.



However,




Runway Zero Three Righthand




Designates runway 03 and a right hand circuit. Very different things! In real life the chance of confusion is fairly slim, but it's worth noting.




Is there any standard or preference of one form or the other to reduce confusion during communication?




Absolutely. Considerable effort has gone into the standardisation of air traffic communications in order to decrease the risk of misunderstanding. Page 6 onwards of CAP413 above goes into excruciating detail about how to utilise numbers, for example.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1




    Wouldn't the number '3' be pronounced as 'tree'? IIRC there is this convention to prevent the speaker from blowing into the microphone when making the 'th' sound.
    – Nijin22
    Aug 14 at 12:10






  • 4




    It would, I didn't write it phonetically though perhaps I should have. Though to be honest, I find a lot of people don't use the phonetic alphabet for numbers
    – Dan
    Aug 14 at 12:27











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "528"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f54286%2fwhat-is-the-correct-phraseology-for-runway-03-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
22
down vote













Runway 03 R would be pronounced as




Runway Zero Three Right




As ever, although British, I thoroughly recommend CAP 413 the UK's Radio Telephony manual:



https://publicapps.caa.co.uk/modalapplication.aspx?catid=1&pagetype=65&appid=11&mode=detail&id=6973



It's mostly ICAO compliant and barring small differences, should contain plenty of information for most operations. You'll see all runways are stated using two digits. Unfortunately I can't find an example of parallel runways in there.



One important note




Runway Zero Three Right




Designates runway 03R, as opposed to runway 03L.



However,




Runway Zero Three Righthand




Designates runway 03 and a right hand circuit. Very different things! In real life the chance of confusion is fairly slim, but it's worth noting.




Is there any standard or preference of one form or the other to reduce confusion during communication?




Absolutely. Considerable effort has gone into the standardisation of air traffic communications in order to decrease the risk of misunderstanding. Page 6 onwards of CAP413 above goes into excruciating detail about how to utilise numbers, for example.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1




    Wouldn't the number '3' be pronounced as 'tree'? IIRC there is this convention to prevent the speaker from blowing into the microphone when making the 'th' sound.
    – Nijin22
    Aug 14 at 12:10






  • 4




    It would, I didn't write it phonetically though perhaps I should have. Though to be honest, I find a lot of people don't use the phonetic alphabet for numbers
    – Dan
    Aug 14 at 12:27















up vote
22
down vote













Runway 03 R would be pronounced as




Runway Zero Three Right




As ever, although British, I thoroughly recommend CAP 413 the UK's Radio Telephony manual:



https://publicapps.caa.co.uk/modalapplication.aspx?catid=1&pagetype=65&appid=11&mode=detail&id=6973



It's mostly ICAO compliant and barring small differences, should contain plenty of information for most operations. You'll see all runways are stated using two digits. Unfortunately I can't find an example of parallel runways in there.



One important note




Runway Zero Three Right




Designates runway 03R, as opposed to runway 03L.



However,




Runway Zero Three Righthand




Designates runway 03 and a right hand circuit. Very different things! In real life the chance of confusion is fairly slim, but it's worth noting.




Is there any standard or preference of one form or the other to reduce confusion during communication?




Absolutely. Considerable effort has gone into the standardisation of air traffic communications in order to decrease the risk of misunderstanding. Page 6 onwards of CAP413 above goes into excruciating detail about how to utilise numbers, for example.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1




    Wouldn't the number '3' be pronounced as 'tree'? IIRC there is this convention to prevent the speaker from blowing into the microphone when making the 'th' sound.
    – Nijin22
    Aug 14 at 12:10






  • 4




    It would, I didn't write it phonetically though perhaps I should have. Though to be honest, I find a lot of people don't use the phonetic alphabet for numbers
    – Dan
    Aug 14 at 12:27













up vote
22
down vote










up vote
22
down vote









Runway 03 R would be pronounced as




Runway Zero Three Right




As ever, although British, I thoroughly recommend CAP 413 the UK's Radio Telephony manual:



https://publicapps.caa.co.uk/modalapplication.aspx?catid=1&pagetype=65&appid=11&mode=detail&id=6973



It's mostly ICAO compliant and barring small differences, should contain plenty of information for most operations. You'll see all runways are stated using two digits. Unfortunately I can't find an example of parallel runways in there.



One important note




Runway Zero Three Right




Designates runway 03R, as opposed to runway 03L.



However,




Runway Zero Three Righthand




Designates runway 03 and a right hand circuit. Very different things! In real life the chance of confusion is fairly slim, but it's worth noting.




Is there any standard or preference of one form or the other to reduce confusion during communication?




Absolutely. Considerable effort has gone into the standardisation of air traffic communications in order to decrease the risk of misunderstanding. Page 6 onwards of CAP413 above goes into excruciating detail about how to utilise numbers, for example.






share|improve this answer














Runway 03 R would be pronounced as




Runway Zero Three Right




As ever, although British, I thoroughly recommend CAP 413 the UK's Radio Telephony manual:



https://publicapps.caa.co.uk/modalapplication.aspx?catid=1&pagetype=65&appid=11&mode=detail&id=6973



It's mostly ICAO compliant and barring small differences, should contain plenty of information for most operations. You'll see all runways are stated using two digits. Unfortunately I can't find an example of parallel runways in there.



One important note




Runway Zero Three Right




Designates runway 03R, as opposed to runway 03L.



However,




Runway Zero Three Righthand




Designates runway 03 and a right hand circuit. Very different things! In real life the chance of confusion is fairly slim, but it's worth noting.




Is there any standard or preference of one form or the other to reduce confusion during communication?




Absolutely. Considerable effort has gone into the standardisation of air traffic communications in order to decrease the risk of misunderstanding. Page 6 onwards of CAP413 above goes into excruciating detail about how to utilise numbers, for example.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Aug 14 at 8:58









Federico♦

23.8k1396149




23.8k1396149










answered Aug 14 at 8:26









Dan

3,90311537




3,90311537







  • 1




    Wouldn't the number '3' be pronounced as 'tree'? IIRC there is this convention to prevent the speaker from blowing into the microphone when making the 'th' sound.
    – Nijin22
    Aug 14 at 12:10






  • 4




    It would, I didn't write it phonetically though perhaps I should have. Though to be honest, I find a lot of people don't use the phonetic alphabet for numbers
    – Dan
    Aug 14 at 12:27













  • 1




    Wouldn't the number '3' be pronounced as 'tree'? IIRC there is this convention to prevent the speaker from blowing into the microphone when making the 'th' sound.
    – Nijin22
    Aug 14 at 12:10






  • 4




    It would, I didn't write it phonetically though perhaps I should have. Though to be honest, I find a lot of people don't use the phonetic alphabet for numbers
    – Dan
    Aug 14 at 12:27








1




1




Wouldn't the number '3' be pronounced as 'tree'? IIRC there is this convention to prevent the speaker from blowing into the microphone when making the 'th' sound.
– Nijin22
Aug 14 at 12:10




Wouldn't the number '3' be pronounced as 'tree'? IIRC there is this convention to prevent the speaker from blowing into the microphone when making the 'th' sound.
– Nijin22
Aug 14 at 12:10




4




4




It would, I didn't write it phonetically though perhaps I should have. Though to be honest, I find a lot of people don't use the phonetic alphabet for numbers
– Dan
Aug 14 at 12:27





It would, I didn't write it phonetically though perhaps I should have. Though to be honest, I find a lot of people don't use the phonetic alphabet for numbers
– Dan
Aug 14 at 12:27













 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f54286%2fwhat-is-the-correct-phraseology-for-runway-03-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest
































































-

這個網誌中的熱門文章

How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

圖片
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite My aim is to smooth the terrain in a video game. Therefore I contrived an algorithm that makes use of Bézier curves of different orders. But this algorithm is defined in a two dimensional space for now. To shift it into the third dimension I need to somehow combine the Bézier curves. Given two curves in each two dimensions, how can I combine them to build a surface? I thought about something like a curve of a curve. Or maybe I could multiply them somehow. How can I combine them to cause the wanted behavior? Is there a common approach? In the image you can see the input, on the left, and the output, on the right, of the algorithm that works in a two dimensional space. For the real application there is a three dimensional input. The algorithm relays only on the adjacent tiles. Given these it will define the control points of the mentioned Bézier cur...
閱讀完整內容

Mutual Information Always Non-negative

圖片
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 10 down vote favorite 6 What is the simplest proof that mutual information is always non-negative? i.e., $I(X;Y)ge0$ probability-theory share | cite | improve this question edited Jun 17 '12 at 15:38 Cameron Buie 83.6k 7 71 154 asked Jun 17 '12 at 15:30 Omri 359 3 13 3 Convexity of the function $tmapsto tlog t$. – Did Jun 17 '12 at 15:33 In addition, the convexity properties require the coefficients in the linear combination sum 1. Then, as p(x,y) is a probability distribution, it fullfits such condition. – Francisco Javier Delgado Ceped Aug 10 at 18:44 add a comment  |  up vote 10 down vote favorite 6 What is the simplest proof that mutual information is always non-negative? i.e., $I(X;Y)ge0$ probability-theory share | cite | improve this question edited Jun 17 ...
閱讀完整內容

Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

圖片
up vote 0 down vote favorite My code workes perfectly for other queries, but for one query I am infinitely getting the same tweet. I can't understand what the problem is. API call: query='Allergic asthma OR Nonallergic asthma OR Occupational asthma OR EIB OR Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction OR Nocturnal asthma OR Cough-variant asthma' new_tweets = api.search(q=searchQuery, count=100, since_id=since_id, lang='en',tweet_mode='extended') if not new_tweets: print("No more tweets found") break for tweet in new_tweets: if True: print(jsonpickle.encode(tweet._json, unpicklable=False)) my_file = open('searchTweets.txt','a') my_file.write(jsonpickle.encode(tweet._json, unpicklable=False)+'n') my_file.close() else: continue Output in file: https://pastebin.com/JmRCsTeE These are the JSONs of the same Tweet. Other queries that work: Breast cancer OR Prostate cancer OR Colon cancer OR Lung cancer Type 2 dia...
閱讀完整內容